Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Primordial Sharp Features through the Nonlinear Regime of Structure Formation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Sharp features from inflation leave surviving bumps in the nonlinear matter power spectrum.

desk verdict Useful proof-of-principle N-body study, but the abstract overclaims: the surviving signal is a monotonic tilt at the resolution edge, not a localized bump whose position recovers kf. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02571 v1 pith:NAECRR7U submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

Clément Stahl , Denis Werth , Vivian Poulin This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords primordialpowerspectrumsharpfeaturesinflationN-bodysimulationsnonlinearstructureformationmatterhalomassfunctioncosmologicaltensions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Sudden violations of slow-roll inflation produce sharp features in the primordial power spectrum, and this paper asks whether those features can survive the strongly nonlinear gravitational evolution that builds cosmic structure. Using N-body simulations seeded with a Gaussian wave-packet feature at $k_f = 2\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ and $|\delta A|=0.2$, the authors find that the oscillatory ringing is erased by mode coupling, but a localised enhancement or deficit of roughly ten percent remains in the matter power spectrum at $z=0$, alongside an oscillatory signature in the halo mass function. The sign and position of the surviving bump track the amplitude and scale of the primordial feature, so nonlinear structure could in principle be used to recover the inflationary feature's parameters. Because CMB data allow such features at small scales, the result turns small-scale structure formation into a plausible new probe of inflation, while also warning that the effect is degenerate with exotic dark-matter scenarios and that current nonlinear emulators miss it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the three-parameter Gaussian wave-packet template for the primordial power-spectrum correction, $$\delta P_\zeta(k) = \delta A \, $e^{{-(k-k_f)^2/(2\Delta_k^2)}}$ \sin(2k/k_f),$$ which the paper derives from a unified effective description in which a sharp feature is a transient bump in either the slow-roll parameter or the sound speed of curvature fluctuations. This single template reproduces the power spectra of a single-field step potential and of a multi-field turn, and it is what gets fed into the initial conditions of the simulations. The nonlinear stage is carried by matched $1024^3$-particle runs sharing one random seed, evolved from redshift 32 to $z=0$ with a standard Tree-PM N-body code; the comparison between feature and featureless runs isolates the surviving signal.

What would settle it

Repeat the same initial-condition pipeline for several feature scales, say $k_f = 0.5$, $2$, and $5\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, with multiple independent random seeds and at least two resolutions: if the location or amplitude of the $z=0$ bump does not track $k_f$ and $\delta A$, or if the bump vanishes once cosmic variance is averaged, the paper's central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a sharp primordial feature of the wave-packet form $$\delta P_\zeta(k) = \delta A \exp\left[-\frac{(k-k_f)^2}{2\$Delta_k^{2}$}\right] \sin\left(2k/k_f\right),$$ with $\delta A = \pm 0.2$ and $k_f = 2\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, does not get completely erased by nonlinear structure formation. After evolving $1024^3$ particles to $z=0$, the oscillatory ringing has been damped away by mode coupling, but a localised enhancement or deficit of roughly ten percent in the matter power spectrum survives at scales above the feature scale, with a sign that follows $\delta A$ and a position set by $k_f$. The same simulations produce a roughly ten percent oscillation in the halo mass function as a function of halo mass. The paper reads these residuals as proof of principle that the scale, amplitude, and sign of a primordial sharp feature can in principle be recovered from small-scale nonlinear structure, while cautioning that the signals resemble those of non-cold dark matter and therefore require joint probes.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the simulated Gaussian wave-packet shape, with the feature scale tied to its oscillation frequency and a 20 percent amplitude, being what real inflation models produce; the authors test only one feature scale, one random seed, and no resolution or convergence study.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Oscillatory, resonant features in the primordial spectrum are washed out by nonlinear mode coupling by $z=0$, so only the localised bump or dip is observable.
  • A measured bump in the nonlinear matter power spectrum can in principle recover the scale $k_f$ and the sign of the primordial feature amplitude $\delta A$.
  • CMB constraints leave the $k_f \gtrsim 1\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ region open to features as large as order one, so the simulated configurations are not excluded.
  • The $z=3$ suppression in the negative-amplitude runs is comparable to the power deficit hinted by Lyman-$\alpha$ forest data, making primordial features a candidate explanation for that tension.
  • Nonlinear emulators trained only on featureless simulations fail to reproduce the $z=0$ response, so reconstructing primordial features from data will require simulations or emulators that include them in initial conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bump's position truly tracks $k_f$ for a range of scales, the nonlinear matter power spectrum becomes a ruler for inflationary feature scales down to galactic scales, something the paper gestures at but does not demonstrate for other $k_f$.
  • The similarity to warm dark matter suggests a concrete discriminator: fit the power spectrum and the halo mass function jointly, since primordial features lack the characteristic low-mass cutoff of warm dark matter halos; the paper notes this possibility but does not quantify it.
  • Because the naive scaling of the bump with $\delta A \Delta_k/k_f$ fails, a one-loop effective-field-theory calculation for the wave-packet template would give a first-principles prediction for the bump amplitude and width that could be tested against the simulations.
  • A multi-seed, multi-resolution extension would put error bars on the roughly ten percent residuals; until then, the statistical significance of the surviving bump remains an open question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether sharp features in the primordial power spectrum—motivated by UV-complete inflationary models—survive the nonlinear gravitational evolution that shapes the late-time matter distribution. The authors build a unified template for sharp features from time-dependent slow-roll parameter or sound-speed variations, derive it via in-in perturbation theory in App. A, constrain its parameters with Planck 2018 TTTEEE+lensing data, and then run 1024^3 N-body simulations with kf=2 Mpc^-1 and |δA|=0.2 for three feature models plus a featureless benchmark, all started at z=32 with 2LPT initial conditions. They report that oscillatory patterns are damped by nonlinearities, while a characteristic enhancement or suppression of roughly ±10% persists at z=0 at the smallest resolved scales, together with an oscillatory pattern in the z=1 halo mass function. They also compare with the Planck-favoured AL-anomaly template and discuss degeneracies with warm dark matter. The central claim is that the surviving power-spectrum signature is a localized bump whose amplitude and position can in principle recover the primordial feature scale.

Significance. If established, this result would open a new window for constraining inflationary physics at small scales and would sharpen the known degeneracies between primordial features and non-cold dark matter. The paper has real strengths: the in-in derivation in App. A is standard and internally consistent; the initial-condition power at z=32 is validated against the linear spectrum at the 2% level; the comparison with Halofit and with a separate AL-anomaly simulation is instructive; and the authors are candid about the preliminary nature of the study. At the same time, the quantitative support for the abstract's recoverability claim is currently weak: the z=0 residuals in Fig. 6 are a monotonic tilt at the resolution edge rather than a localized in-range peak, only one feature scale and one random seed are used, and no error bars or convergence tests are presented. The central claim is defensible as a proof of concept only if these gaps are addressed or the claims are substantially toned down.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. IIIB1, Fig. 6] The abstract and conclusion state that the surviving signature is a 'localised power enhancement or decrease' whose position can be used to recover the primordial feature scale. The simulations do not show any localized, in-range peak: at z=0 the residuals in Fig. 6 grow monotonically toward the smallest resolved scales, reaching about ±10% at the numerical edge, and no extremum is reported at a scale tied to kf=2 Mpc^-1. This is a broad tilt, degenerate with spectral-index running and with the WDM-like suppression fitted in Sec. IIIB3, so the position-recovery claim is not demonstrated. Because only kf=2 Mpc^-1 is simulated and no resolution or convergence study is presented, the scaling of any putative peak with kf is also untested. I recommend either softening the claims to match the demonstrated monotonic tilt, or running additional simulations with different kf values and larger dynamic range to establish whether a peak actually forms.
  2. [Sec. IIIB, Tables II-III, Figs. 6-7] No error bars, covariance estimates, or seed-variation tests are provided for the matter power-spectrum ratios or the halo mass function ratios. All feature runs share a single random seed, so the noise from nonlinear mode coupling is unquantified; at z=0 the ±10% residuals could be partly sample variance or resolution artifacts, and the high-mass bins in Fig. 7 contain few halos. A convergence test varying box size, particle number, and random seed, together with an estimate of the ratio covariance, is needed before the quantitative survival amplitude can be considered robust.
  3. [Sec. IIB2; Sec. IIIB; Table III] The N-body runs are initialized from the ad hoc Gaussian wave-packet template (14), not from the power spectra of the concrete UV-complete models computed in Sec. IIA. The fidelity of (14) to those models is established only qualitatively from Figs. 1-2, and the mapping between template parameters and UV-model parameters in Table III is presented without derivation or validation. The paper should either test at least one concrete model spectrum in the N-body code or explicitly restrict the conclusions to the template family, since the claim that the results apply to UV-complete inflationary models rests on this unvalidated equivalence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (10)] The display of Eq. (10) in the main text is typeset ambiguously, with a trailing 'sin(2kτ)' that appears to hang at the end of the brace; the derivation in App. A is clear, but the equation should be typeset consistently.
  2. [Sec. IIB2] The relationship between the Dirac-delta templates (13) and the Gaussian envelope template (14) is not explained; in particular, Eq. (14) replaces the 1/(k/kf)^2 decay of the slow-roll template with a Gaussian envelope, and the text should state explicitly that this is a phenomenological fit rather than a limit of Eq. (13).
  3. [Sec. IIIB1] The sentence 'the shaded gray region corresponds to the the scales simulated' contains a duplicated article; this is a minor typo.
  4. [Sec. IIIB1] The scaling argument δA Δk/kf is introduced with no derivation and then immediately shown to fail against the simulations; it would be helpful to state the assumptions under which it is derived so the reader can see why it is not expected to hold.
  5. [Sec. IV] The conclusions repeat the 'localised power enhancement or decrease' phrasing; if the abstract is revised per the first major comment, the conclusions should be revised consistently to avoid overstating the demonstrated result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the N-body evolution of an externally motivated primordial-feature template is a genuine forward calculation.

full rationale

The central claim is that a bump-like remnant of a sharp primordial feature can survive nonlinear gravitational evolution. The paper injects the template of Eq. (14), with parameters (deltaA, Delta k, kf) chosen as free inputs from CMB-consistency considerations, into 2LPT initial conditions and evolves them with Gadget-4; the z=0 matter power spectrum and halo mass function are outputs of that evolution, not quantities used to fit the template. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The statement that the feature position can recover kf is a forward-mapping statement from an input parameter to the evolved statistics, not a fit masquerading as a prediction. The template itself is motivated by the in-in result of Eq. (10), which is derived in Appendix A from the quadratic action (8) using standard perturbation theory with external references, and the paper explicitly reports that the naive integrated-power scaling P/P_LCDM - 1 proportional to deltaA Delta k/kf fails to match the simulations, showing the nonlinear response is not forced by construction. The self-citations that appear (Refs. [20,21,71,146,152,153]) are contextual: they support background claims about Ly-alpha tensions, non-Gaussianities, or degeneracies with dark-matter candidates, and they are not load-bearing for the main survival result. The observation that the nonlinear residual may be a monotonic tilt rather than a localized in-range peak, and the use of a single kf value, are legitimate concerns about the strength of the claim, but they are matters of completeness and interpretation, not circularity. The derivation chain therefore does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of three template parameters, a Gaussian-envelope ansatz, the assumption of Gaussian primordial fluctuations, and the faithfulness of a single N-body realization. No new particle, force, or physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • deltaA (feature amplitude) = +0.2 (sim-1), -0.2 (sim-2, sim-3)
    Chosen by hand to give a ~20% primordial correction near the CMB constraint limit; the nonlinear response scales with this amplitude.
  • kf (feature scale) = 2 Mpc^-1
    Chosen to be at scales relevant for S8 and Ly-alpha tensions; only one value is simulated, so the claimed recoverability of the scale is not scanned.
  • Delta_k (feature width in k-space) = 1 Mpc^-1 (sim-1, sim-2), 10 Mpc^-1 (sim-3)
    Varies the number of oscillations in the template; the nonlinear response depends on it in a non-trivial way.
  • (alpha, beta) WDM transfer-function fit = (0.04 Mpc/h, 1.7) for sim-2; (0.01 Mpc/h, 1.0) for sim-3
    Fitted to the simulated bump to illustrate degeneracy with warm dark matter; this is an interpretive fit, not used to produce the main simulation results.
  • gamma in WDM fitting formula = 5
    Set 'without loss of generality' following Ref. [149]; a hand-chosen value in the degeneracy illustration.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard in-in formalism and mode functions for curvature perturbations are valid for computing the power-spectrum correction (Eq. 10).
    Invoked in Appendix A via Weinberg's in-in formula and the usual slow-roll mode function zeta_k(tau).
  • ad hoc to paper The Gaussian wave-packet template (14), with kf tied to the oscillation frequency, faithfully represents sharp features from UV-complete inflationary models.
    Introduced in Sec. IIB2 as a unified template; the envelope is chosen by hand and the scale is fixed to the oscillation frequency to maintain perturbativity. All simulations and CMB constraints use this template.
  • domain assumption Primordial fluctuations are Gaussian, so only the power spectrum needs to be modified in the initial conditions.
    The N-body simulations are initialized with Gaussian fields; the paper explicitly leaves primordial non-Gaussianity to future work (Sec. IV).
  • domain assumption A single 1024^3 dark-matter-only N-body simulation with 2LPT initial conditions at z=32, box size 100 Mpc/h, and a shared random seed is a faithful representation of nonlinear structure formation on the scales probed.
    This is the numerical setup in Sec. IIIB (Table II); no convergence tests or multiple realizations are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Primordial Sharp Features through the Nonlinear Regime of Structure Formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NAECRR7U

@misc{pith2026250202571,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Primordial Sharp Features through the Nonlinear Regime of Structure Formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NAECRR7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02571}
}
read the original abstract

Sudden violations of the slow-roll regime during inflation, a natural prediction of many UV-complete inflationary models, give rise to sharp features in the primordial power spectrum. At large scales, these features provide a unique window into the physics of inflation, with constraints primarily derived from Cosmic Microwave Background observations of linearly evolved primordial fluctuations. However, on smaller scales, it is less clear whether primordial features would survive the late-time nonlinear cosmological evolution, as they are expected to be washed out by mode coupling. In this paper, we run dedicated N-body simulations to tackle this question. We demonstrate that, while oscillatory-like patterns are erased over time by nonlinearities, signatures of primordial sharp features can persist through the nonlinear regime of structure formation. Those take the form of a localised power enhancement or decrease in the matter power spectrum, whose amplitude and position can in principle be used to recover the scale of the primordial feature, and an oscillatory pattern in the halo mass function. While these findings highlight the power for constraining inflationary physics at small scales, they also show the challenges posed by potential degeneracies with other physical processes relevant in the nonlinear regime of structure formation such as non-cold dark matter candidates. Our results open new avenues for probing inflationary physics in large scale structures and galactic physics and emphasise the need for refined theoretical tools to robustly constrain primordial features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02571 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Primordial (dimensionless) power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Primordial (dimensionless) power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Relative correction to the dimensionless primor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dimensionless primordial power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: 2D posterior distributions of the most relevant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Ratio of the matter power spectra between the run with and without features, for the three simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Halo mass function for the three simulations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Impact of the phenomenological feature favoured by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Comparison of the 2D posteriors in the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Primordial Physics in the Nonlinear Universe: Revealing the oscillating halo bias from cosmological collider models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A binning-based IC method yields the first N-body measurements of oscillating halo bias from cosmological collider bispectra, with mass- and assembly-dependent phases fit by peak-background-split theory.

  2. Inverse-k Primordial Oscillations from a Symbolic Regression Search

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Symbolic regression on Planck and Planck+ACT+SPT independently selects an inverse-k primordial oscillation cos(B/k)≈cos(4/k) that weakly outperforms linear and log templates.

  3. Bispectrum BAO and the baryon-dark matter relative velocity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A template-based bispectrum-monopole BAO measurement is shown to be unbiased on simulations and, jointly with the power spectrum, to sharpen BAO constraints while exposing baryon-dark matter velocity biases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

188 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Single-Field Step Potential 3

  2. [2]

    Unified Effective Description of Features 4

    Turn in Multi-Field Space 3 B. Unified Effective Description of Features 4

  3. [3]

    Time-dependent Slow-roll Parameter or Sound Speed 4

  4. [4]

    Cosmological Evolution with Features 7 A

    Primordial Feature Templates 5 III. Cosmological Evolution with Features 7 A. Constraints from Linear CMB Physics 7 B. N-body Simulations of the Inflationary Template 8

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum 8

  6. [6]

    Halo Mass Function 10

  7. [7]

    cosmic tensions

    Discussion 10 C. Case Study: the Phenomenological Feature Favoured byPlanck 11 IV. Conclusions and Outlook 11 A. Details on Primordial Power Spectrum with Features 12 B. On the Use of a Logarithmic Prior onδA in the Bayesian Analysis 13 ∗ clement.stahl@unistra.fr † denis.werth@iap.fr ‡ vivian.poulin@umontpellier.fr I. Introduction The inflationary paradig...

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    [11, 12] for the study of the corresponding non-Gaussianities

    Single-Field Step Potential The simplest model of inflation that exhibits a sharp feature is a single field rolling on a potential with a sud- den step [23, 108], see also Ref. [11, 12] for the study of the corresponding non-Gaussianities. We consider the potential V (ϕ) = 1 2m2ϕ2 [ 1 +δ tanh (ϕ−ϕ0 ∆ϕ )] . (3) In the absence of features, i.e. settingδ = 0...

Show all 188 references
  1. [9]

    As models with two fields have been widely explored in the literature, see e.g

    Turn in Multi-Field Space Features notably also arise from non-trivial trajectories in a multi-dimensional field space, such as turns, that can lead to striking observational signatures. As models with two fields have been widely explored in the literature, see e.g. Refs. [115...

  2. [10]

    Time-dependent Slow-roll Parameter or Sound Speed The background dynamics dictates the time evolution of the parameters in the action governing the fluctua- tions. A feature in the inflationary potential induces a time dependence in the first slow-roll parameterϵ(t)≡ − ˙H/H 2,...

  3. [11]

    However, its overall shape is only determined by the characteristic time of the feature

    Primordial Feature Templates As seen previously, the feature precise characteristic sig- nificantly depends on the details of the inflationary model. However, its overall shape is only determined by the characteristic time of the feature. In order to derive an analytical templ...

    2018

  4. [12]

    X. Chen, R. Easther, and E. A. Lim, JCAP04, 010 (2008), arXiv:0801.3295 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    6, we show the ratio of the matter power spectra with and without features

    Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum In Fig. 6, we show the ratio of the matter power spectra with and without features. The linear power spectrum generated with CLASS and the initialz = 32 power spec- trum of the simulation agree below2% thus validating our initial condition imple...

  6. [14]

    oscillation

    Halo Mass Function Next, we check the impact of the primordial features on the abundance of virialised objects. We detected halos using Subfind that is included in the public version of Gadget-4 and adopt for the definition of massM200: a halo atz = 0 has a boundary when its d...

  7. [15]

    oscillation

    Discussion The influence of the primordial features on the power spectrumandtheHMFissimilartootherextensionsofthe standard model of cosmology. To illustrate this, we relate thedipinthe linear matterpowerspectrumofthefeatures with δA < 0 to a phenomenological parametrisation of...

    2018

  8. [16]

    Using the in-in formalism [ 168], the correction to the power spectrum can be written (using notations of Ref. [169]) =−i ∫0 −∞ dta 3(t)ucs(t) × [∂tG+(k;t)][∂tG+(k;t)], (A2) where ucs ≡ 1−c−2 s and G+(k;t) = ζ∗ k(t)ζk(0) with ζk(τ) = H√ 2k3 (1 +ikτ )e−ikτ the mode function of ...

  9. [17]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  10. [18]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  11. [19]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B108, 389 (1982). 8 We have removed the overall normalisationM 2 plϵ as it does not enter the relative correction to the featureless power spectrum. Note that the power spectrum of a canonically normalised field reads H 2/2k3. 14

    1982

  12. [20]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  13. [21]

    Akramiet al

    Y. Akramiet al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press,

  15. [23]

    Adams, B

    J. Adams, B. Cresswell, and R. Easther, Physics Review D 64, 123514 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0102236 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Chen, Adv

    X. Chen, Adv. Astron. 2010, 638979 (2010), arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Chluba, J

    J. Chluba, J. Hamann, and S. P. Patil, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530023 (2015), arXiv:1505.01834 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Slosaret al., Bull

    A. Slosaret al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 98 (2019), arXiv:1903.09883 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Achúcarroet al., (2022), arXiv:2203.08128 [astro- ph.CO]

    A. Achúcarroet al., (2022), arXiv:2203.08128 [astro- ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    X. Chen, R. Easther, and E. A. Lim, JCAP06, 023 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0611645

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    P. D. Meerburg, D. N. Spergel, and B. D. Wandelt, Physics Review D89, 063537 (2014), arXiv:1308.3705 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Adshead, C

    P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu, and E. A. Lim, Phys. Rev. D85, 023531 (2012), arXiv:1110.3050 [astro- ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Achúcarro, J.-O

    A. Achúcarro, J.-O. Gong, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, Phys. Rev. D87, 121301 (2013), arXiv:1211.5619 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Achúcarro, V

    A. Achúcarro, V. Atal, P. Ortiz, and J. Torrado, Phys. Rev. D89, 103006 (2014), arXiv:1311.2552 [astro- ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Cannone, and S. Matarrese, JCAP10, 038 (2013), arXiv:1307.3483 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Achúcarro, V

    A. Achúcarro, V. Atal, B. Hu, P. Ortiz, and J. Torrado, Physics Review D90, 023511 (2014), arXiv:1404.7522 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Torrado, B

    J. Torrado, B. Hu, and A. Achúcarro, Physics Review D 96, 083515 (2017), arXiv:1611.10350 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    X. Chen, R. Ebadi, and S. Kumar, JCAP08, 083 (2022), arXiv:2205.01107 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Werth, L

    D. Werth, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 141002 (2024), arXiv:2302.00655 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, (2023), arXiv:2312.06559 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Wang and G

    Y. Wang and G. Mathews, Astrophys. J.573, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0011351

    2002 arXiv

  32. [40]

    D. K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G. F. Smoot, and A. A. Starobinsky, JCAP2016, 009 (2016), arXiv:1605.02106 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    H. V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, L. Verde, D. N. Spergel, C. L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, L. Page, G. S. Tucker, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright, apjs148, 213 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0302225 [astro-ph]

    2003

  34. [42]

    Mukherjee and Y

    P. Mukherjee and Y. Wang, apj 599, 1 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0303211 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  35. [43]

    L. Covi, J. Hamann, A. Melchiorri, A. Slosar, and I. Sor- bera, Physics Review D74, 083509 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0606452 [astro-ph]

    2006

  36. [44]

    Hamann, L

    J. Hamann, L. Covi, A. Melchiorri, and A. Slosar, Physics Review D 76, 023503 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0701380 [astro-ph]

    2007

  37. [45]

    P. D. Meerburg, R. A. M. J. Wijers, and J. P. van der Schaar, mnras421, 369 (2012), arXiv:1109.5264 [astro- ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    S. S. Naik, K. Furuuchi, and P. Chingangbam, JCAP 2022, 016 (2022), arXiv:2202.05862 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Benetti, Physics Review D 88, 087302 (2013), arXiv:1308.6406 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Benetti, Physics Review D 88, 087302 (2013), arXiv:1308.6406 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Miranda and W

    V. Miranda and W. Hu, Physics Review D89, 083529 (2014), arXiv:1312.0946 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Easther and R

    R. Easther and R. Flauger, jcap 2014, 037 (2014), arXiv:1308.3736 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Chen and M

    X. Chen and M. H. Namjoo, Physics Letters B739, 285 (2014), arXiv:1404.1536 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    D. K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G. F. Smoot, and A. A. Starobinsky, jcap 2014, 048 (2014), arXiv:1405.2012 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    D. K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, and T. Souradeep, jcap2014, 011 (2014), arXiv:1406.4827 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Hu and J

    B. Hu and J. Torrado, Physics Review D91, 064039 (2015), arXiv:1410.4804 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Collaboration, aap594, A20 (2016), arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

    P. Collaboration, aap594, A20 (2016), arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Gruppuso and A

    A. Gruppuso and A. Sagnotti, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D 24, 1544008-469 (2015), arXiv:1506.08093 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gruppuso, N

    A. Gruppuso, N. Kitazawa, N. Mandolesi, P. Natoli, and A. Sagnotti, Physics of the Dark Universe11, 68 (2016), arXiv:1508.00411 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Hazumiet al

    M. Hazumiet al. (LiteBIRD), Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 11443, 114432F (2020), arXiv:2101.12449 [astro- ph.IM]

    2020

  50. [58]

    Ballardini, Physics of the Dark Universe23, 100245 (2019), arXiv:1807.05521 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Ballardini, Physics of the Dark Universe23, 100245 (2019), arXiv:1807.05521 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    C. Zeng, E. D. Kovetz, X. Chen, Y. Gong, J. B. Muñoz, and M. Kamionkowski, Physics Review D99, 043517 (2019), arXiv:1812.05105 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cañas-Herrera, J

    G. Cañas-Herrera, J. Torrado, and A. Achúcarro, Physics Review D103, 123531 (2021), arXiv:2012.04640 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, and D. K. Hazra, JCAP2021, 005 (2021), arXiv:2103.03025 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, and D. K. Hazra, European Phys- ical Journal C82, 498 (2022), arXiv:2106.07546 [astro- ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A. G. Riesset al., Astrophys. J. Lett.934, L7 (2022), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Hamann and J

    J. Hamann and J. Wons, JCAP 2022, 036 (2022), arXiv:2112.08571 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gallego Cadavid, A

    A. Gallego Cadavid, A. E. Romano, and S. Gariazzo, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 242 (2017), arXiv:1612.03490 [astro- ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Domènech and M

    G. Domènech and M. Kamionkowski, JCAP2019, 040 (2019), arXiv:1905.04323 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Domènech, X

    G. Domènech, X. Chen, M. Kamionkowski, and A. Loeb, JCAP 2020, 005 (2020), arXiv:2005.08998 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, and D. K. Hazra, Physics Review D 105, 103523 (2022), arXiv:2108.10110 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Ballardini and F

    M. Ballardini and F. Finelli, JCAP2022, 083 (2022), arXiv:2207.14410 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    D. K. Hazra, A. Antony, and A. Shafieloo, JCAP08, 063 (2022), arXiv:2201.12000 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Aiola et al

    S. Aiola et al. (ACT), JCAP 12, 047 (2020), arXiv:2007.07288 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Balkenholet al

    L. Balkenholet al. (SPT-3G), Phys. Rev. D108, 023510 (2023), arXiv:2212.05642 [astro-ph.CO]. 15

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    P.Ade etal.(SimonsObservatory),JCAP 02,056(2019), arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Aricò, R

    G. Aricò, R. E. Angulo, M. Zennaro, S. Contreras, A. Chen, and C. Hernández-Monteagudo, Astron. Astro- phys.678, A109 (2023), arXiv:2303.05537 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Abazajian et al., (2019), arXiv:1907.04473 [astro- ph.IM]

    K. Abazajian et al., (2019), arXiv:1907.04473 [astro- ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Kogutet al., (2024), arXiv:2405.20403 [astro-ph.CO]

    A. Kogutet al., (2024), arXiv:2405.20403 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    André et al

    P. André et al. (PRISM), JCAP 02, 006 (2014), arXiv:1310.1554 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, D. K. Hazra, and L. Pinol, JCAP 03, 014 (2023), arXiv:2210.07028 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Petretti, M

    C. Petretti, M. Braglia, X. Chen, D. K. Hazra, and S. Paban, (2024), arXiv:2411.03459 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Liu and Z

    M. Liu and Z. Huang, Astrophys. J.897, 166 (2020), arXiv:1910.05670 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Aghanimet al

    N. Aghanimet al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Asgariet al

    M. Asgariet al. (KiDS), Astron. Astrophys.645, A104 (2021), arXiv:2007.15633 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al. (DES), Phys. Rev. D105, 023520 (2022), arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Hikageet al

    C. Hikageet al. (HSC), Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.71, 43 (2019), arXiv:1809.09148 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Chabanier et al

    S. Chabanier et al. (eBOSS), JCAP 07, 017 (2019), arXiv:1812.03554 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yèche, N. Schöneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier, and E. Ar- mengaud, JCAP04, 038 (2020), arXiv:1911.09073 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. C. Hill, V. Iršič, and B. D. Sherwin, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 201001 (2023), arXiv:2303.00746 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    K. K. Rogers and V. Poulin, (2023), arXiv:2311.16377 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    W. L. Freedman, Astrophys. J. 919, 16 (2021), arXiv:2106.15656 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Amonet al., Mon

    A. Amonet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518, 477 (2023), arXiv:2202.07440 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  83. [91]

    G. A. Palma, D. Sapone, and S. Sypsas, JCAP2018, 004 (2018), arXiv:1710.02570 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    M. A. Fernandez, S. Bird, and M.-F. Ho, JCAP07, 029 (2024), arXiv:2309.03943 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Walther et al., (2024), arXiv:2412.05372 [astro- ph.CO]

    M. Walther et al., (2024), arXiv:2412.05372 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, I. S. Jang, T. J. Hoyt, A. J. Lee, and K. A. Owens, (2024), arXiv:2408.06153 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 977, 120 (2024), arXiv:2408.11770 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Abdalla et al., JHEAp 34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO]

    E. Abdalla et al., JHEAp 34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Ballardini and N

    M. Ballardini and N. Barbieri, (2024), arXiv:2411.02261 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    R. E. Keeley, A. Shafieloo, D. K. Hazra, and T. Souradeep, JCAP2020, 055 (2020), arXiv:2006.12710 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Antony, F

    A. Antony, F. Finelli, D. K. Hazra, and A. Shafieloo, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 111001 (2023), arXiv:2202.14028 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Y. Wang, D. N. Spergel, and M. A. Strauss, Astrophys. J. 510, 20 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9802231 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  93. [101]

    H. Zhan, L. Knox, J. A. Tyson, and V. Margoniner, Astrophys. J. 640, 8 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0508119 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Huang, L

    Z. Huang, L. Verde, and F. Vernizzi, JCAP2012, 005 (2012), arXiv:1201.5955 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  95. [103]

    X. Chen, C. Dvorkin, Z. Huang, M. H. Namjoo, and L. Verde, JCAP2016, 014 (2016), arXiv:1605.09365 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  96. [104]

    X. Chen, P. D. Meerburg, and M. Münchmeyer, JCAP 2016, 023 (2016), arXiv:1605.09364 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, C. Fedeli, and L. Moscar- dini, JCAP2016, 041 (2016), arXiv:1606.03747 [astro- ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Y. Xu, J. Hamann, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D94, 123518 (2016), arXiv:1607.00817 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Ansari Fard and S

    M. Ansari Fard and S. Baghram, JCAP2018, 051 (2018), arXiv:1709.05323 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [108]

    A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.55, 489 (1992)

    1992

  101. [109]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, R. Maartens, and L. Moscar- dini, JCAP2018, 044 (2018), arXiv:1712.07425 [astro- ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Ballardini, R

    M. Ballardini, R. Murgia, M. Baldi, F. Finelli, and M. Viel, JCAP 2020, 030 (2020), arXiv:1912.12499 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Debono, D

    I. Debono, D. K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G. F. Smoot, and A. A. Starobinsky, mnras 496, 3448 (2020), arXiv:2003.05262 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Li, H.-M

    Y. Li, H.-M. Zhu, and B. Li, mnras514, 4363 (2022), arXiv:2102.09007 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Ballardiniet al

    M. Ballardiniet al. (Euclid), Astron. Astrophys.683, A220 (2024), arXiv:2309.17287 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    J. W. Ronayne and D. J. Mulryne, JCAP01, 023 (2018), arXiv:1708.07130 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Beutler, M

    F. Beutler, M. Biagetti, D. Green, A. Slosar, and B. Wal- lisch, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033209 (2019), arXiv:1906.08758 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini, and A. Veropalumbo, Phys. Rev. D107, 043532 (2023), arXiv:2202.08819 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Mergulhão, F

    T. Mergulhão, F. Beutler, and J. A. Peacock, JCAP08, 012 (2023), arXiv:2303.13946 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, M. Y. Chu, and Y. Feng, JCAP03, 057 (2016), arXiv:1509.02120 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Vasudevan, M

    A. Vasudevan, M. M. Ivanov, S. Sibiryakov, and J. Les- gourgues, JCAP09, 037 (2019), arXiv:1906.08697 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah, and M. White, JCAP 11, 035 (2020), arXiv:2007.00704 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [121]

    (SDSS), The Astrophysical Journal Sup- plement Series235, 42 (2018)

    Abolfathi et al. (SDSS), The Astrophysical Journal Sup- plement Series235, 42 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    M. A. Troxelet al. (DES), Phys. Rev. D98, 043528 (2018), arXiv:1708.01538 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  115. [123]

    J. B. Muñoz, C. Dvorkin, and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063526 (2020), arXiv:1911.11144 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  116. [124]

    S. S. Naik, P. Chingangbam, S. Singh, A. Mesinger, and K. Furuuchi, (2025), arXiv:2501.02538 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  117. [125]

    X. Gao, D. Langlois, and S. Mizuno, JCAP10, 023 (2013), arXiv:1306.5680 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Hunt and S

    P. Hunt and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D70, 103518 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0408138

    2004 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Gong, JCAP 07, 015 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0504383

    J.-O. Gong, JCAP 07, 015 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0504383. 16

    2005

  120. [128]

    M. Joy, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023514 (2008), arXiv:0711.1585 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  121. [129]

    M. Dias, J. Frazer, D. J. Mulryne, and D. Seery, JCAP 12, 033 (2016), arXiv:1609.00379 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  122. [130]

    D. J. Mulryne and J. W. Ronayne, J. Open Source Softw. 3, 494 (2018), arXiv:1609.00381 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Takahashi, M

    R. Takahashi, M. Sato, T. Nishimichi, A. Taruya, and M. Oguri, Astrophys. J.761, 152 (2012), arXiv:1208.2701 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Langlois, Phys

    D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. D59, 123512 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9906080

    1999

  125. [133]

    D.Wands, N.Bartolo, S.Matarrese, andA.Riotto,Phys. Rev. D66, 043520 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0205253

    2002 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Lesgourgues, Nucl

    J. Lesgourgues, Nucl. Phys. B 582, 593 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9911447

    2000 arXiv

  127. [135]

    C. M. Peterson and M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. D83, 023522 (2011), arXiv:1005.4056 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Achucarro, J.-O

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, JCAP01, 030 (2011), arXiv:1010.3693 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  129. [137]

    We thus defer this to future work

    and SPT-3G [138]) and including those data at this stage would require improving the nonlinear prediction. We thus defer this to future work. We also note some mild degeneracies betweenδA and ns (and even milder with As) for the larger values ofδA. This in turn leads to slight...

    2018

  130. [138]

    Konieczka, R

    M. Konieczka, R. H. Ribeiro, and K. Turzynski, JCAP 07, 030 (2014), arXiv:1401.6163 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Garcia-Saenz, L

    S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, JHEP 01, 073 (2020), arXiv:1907.10403 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Chen and Y

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, JCAP 04, 027 (2010), arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  133. [141]

    M. Dias, J. Frazer, and D. Seery, JCAP12, 030 (2015), arXiv:1502.03125 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  134. [142]

    X. Gao, D. Langlois, and S. Mizuno, JCAP10, 040 (2012), arXiv:1205.5275 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Cespedes, V

    S. Cespedes, V. Atal, and G. A. Palma, JCAP05, 008 (2012), arXiv:1201.4848 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Achucarro, J.-O

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, JHEP05, 066 (2012), arXiv:1201.6342 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Achucarro, V

    A. Achucarro, V. Atal, S. Cespedes, J.-O. Gong, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, Phys. Rev. D86, 121301 (2012), arXiv:1205.0710 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Achucarro, J.-O

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043502 (2011), arXiv:1005.3848 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  139. [147]

    G. A. Palma, JCAP04, 035 (2015), arXiv:1412.5615 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Murgia, A

    R. Murgia, A. Merle, M. Viel, M. Totzauer, and A. Schneider, JCAP11, 046 (2017), arXiv:1704.07838 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  141. [149]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, JCAP07, 034 (2011), arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Audren, J

    B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, K. Benabed, and S. Prunet, JCAP 1302, 001 (2013), arXiv:1210.7183 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Brinckmann and J

    T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, (2018), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Lewis, Phys

    A. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103529 (2013), arXiv:1304.4473 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Gelman and D

    A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Statist. Sci.7, 457 (1992)

    1992

  146. [154]

    F. J. Quet al. (ACT), Astrophys. J.962, 112 (2024), arXiv:2304.05202 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  147. [155]

    F. Geet al. (SPT-3G), (2024), arXiv:2411.06000 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Amon and G

    A. Amon and G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516, 5355 (2022), arXiv:2206.11794 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Preston, A

    C. Preston, A. Amon, and G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.525, 5554 (2023), arXiv:2305.09827 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  150. [158]

    R. E. Angulo and O. Hahn, (2021), 10.1007/s41115-021- 00013-z, arXiv:2112.05165 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Springel, R

    V. Springel, R. Pakmor, O. Zier, and M. Rei- necke, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 2871 (2021), arXiv:2010.03567 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  152. [160]

    H.-J. Seo, E. R. Siegel, D. J. Eisenstein, and M. White, Astrophys. J.686, 13 (2008), arXiv:0805.0117 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  153. [161]

    M. R. Buckley, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurd- son, and M. Vogelsberger, Phys. Rev. D90, 043524 (2014), arXiv:1405.2075 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Schaeffer and A

    T. Schaeffer and A. Schneider, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 504, 3773 (2021), arXiv:2101.12229 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Stahl, B

    C. Stahl, B. Famaey, R. Ibata, O. Hahn, N. Martinet, and T. Montandon, Phys. Rev. D110, 063501 (2024), arXiv:2404.03244 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Fiorino, S

    L. Fiorino, S. Contarini, F. Marulli, A. G. Sanchez, M. Baldi, A. Fiorilli, and L. Moscardini, (2024), arXiv:2410.21457 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  157. [165]

    J. D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90 (2007)

    2007

  158. [166]

    Stücker, R

    J. Stücker, R. E. Angulo, O. Hahn, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509, 1703 (2021), arXiv:2109.09760 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Cyr-Racine, K

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, J. Zavala, T. Bring- mann, M. Vogelsberger, and C. Pfrommer, Phys. Rev. D 93, 123527 (2016), arXiv:1512.05344 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Enziet al., Mon

    W. Enziet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 5848 (2021), arXiv:2010.13802 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  161. [169]

    S. Das, A. Maharana, V. Poulin, and R. K. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103503 (2022), arXiv:2104.03329 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Stahl, B

    C. Stahl, B. Famaey, R. Ibata, K. Kraljic, and F. Castillo, (2025), arXiv:2501.03672 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  163. [171]

    S. Bohr, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, M. Vogelsberger, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 498, 3403 (2020), arXiv:2006.01842 [astro- ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  164. [172]

    S. Bohr, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and M. Vogels- berger, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 128 (2021), arXiv:2101.08790 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  165. [173]

    Koyamaet al

    K. Koyamaet al. (Euclid), (2024), arXiv:2409.03524 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  166. [174]

    Smith, M

    A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, (2024), arXiv:2410.11099 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Cannone, N

    D. Cannone, N. Bartolo, and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D 89, 127301 (2014), arXiv:1402.2258 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Rosenberg, S

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton, and G. Efstathiou, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517, 4620 (2022), arXiv:2205.10869 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Tristramet al., Astron

    M. Tristramet al., Astron. Astrophys.682, A37 (2024), arXiv:2309.10034 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Pajer, F

    E. Pajer, F. Schmidt, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083502 (2013), arXiv:1305.0824 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  171. [179]

    M. J. Turk, B. D. Smith, J. S. Oishi, S. Skory, S. W. Skillman, T. Abel, and M. L. Norman, apjs 192, 9 (2011), arXiv:1011.3514 [astro-ph.IM]

    2011 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, “Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.008 (2018), ascl:1811.008. 17

    2018

  173. [181]

    Perez and B

    F. Perez and B. E. Granger, Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 21 (2007)

    2007

  174. [183]

    van der Walt, S

    S. van der Walt, S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux, Com- put. Sci. Eng.13, 22 (2011), arXiv:1102.1523 [cs.MS]

    2011 arXiv

  175. [184]

    Berthoud, B

    F. Berthoud, B. Bzeznik, N. Gibelin, M. Laurens, C. Bonamy, M. Morel, and X. Schwindenhammer, Estimation de l’empreinte carbone d’une heure.coeur de calcul, Research Report (UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes ; CNRS ; INP Grenoble ; INRIA, 2020)

    2020

  176. [185]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D72, 043514 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0506236

    2005

  177. [186]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, JCAP12, 006 (2017), arXiv:1703.10166 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  178. [187]

    Feroz, M

    F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.398, 1601 (2009), arXiv:0809.3437 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  179. [188]

    Karwal, Y

    T. Karwal, Y. Patel, A. Bartlett, V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, and D. N. Pfeffer, (2024), arXiv:2401.14225 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  180. [2015]

    arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.