Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Theory of resonances

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every resonance is a pole of the scattering matrix, and its mass, width, and coupling are read off from that pole.

desk verdict A solid, honest pedagogical review of resonance theory; nothing new, but the exposition is careful and the pole-based definition of resonance parameters is presented with unusual clarity. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02654 v2 pith:K3KVN3LW submitted 2025-02-04 hep-ph nucl-th

Maxim Mai This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords hadronspectrumresonancesS-matrixscatteringamplitudesunitarityBreit-WignerparametrizationFlattétransitionformfactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out to show that the familiar mass and width of an unstable hadron are not primary data but are the real and imaginary parts of the position of a pole of the scattering amplitude in the complex energy plane. The pole formula $\sqrt{s_*}=M-i\Gamma/2$ and the residue formula $g^2=\lim_{s\to s_*}(s-s_*)\,T_{\ell m}(s)$ define reaction-independent resonance parameters. The same analytic structure unifies bound states, virtual bound states, and resonances, which differ only in where their poles sit relative to thresholds and on which Riemann sheet they appear. The review derives the unitarity cut for two-body scalar scattering and shows how common amplitude forms implement that structure. If the picture is right, hadron spectroscopy has a single canonical way to compare experiments, numerical simulations, and models: locate the poles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the analytic $S$-matrix and its Riemann surface, where the physical sheet connects smoothly to the amplitude that experiments measure. The key identity is the partial-wave unitarity condition $\mathrm{Disc}\,T_{\ell m}(s)=i p_{\mathrm{cms}}/(4\pi\sqrt{s})\,|T_{\ell m}(s)|^2$ for $4m^2<\mathrm{Re}\,s<9m^2$, which locates the threshold branch cut; combined with the meromorphicity that the review attributes to causality, it implies that all information about a state sits in pole positions and residues. The operational definition of resonance parameters is $\sqrt{s_*}=M-i\Gamma/2$ with $g^2=\lim_{s\to s_*}(s-s_*)\,T_{\ell m}(s)$.

What would settle it

Find one resonance whose extracted pole position depends on the production channel: for example, analyze the same final state from a hadroproduction dataset and a photoproduction dataset with amplitudes that each satisfy unitarity, and look for pole displacements larger than the summed uncertainties; any such displacement would falsify the universal-pole claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the analytic structure of the $S$-matrix is where resonance parameters live. The physical amplitude on the first Riemann sheet is the boundary value of a complex function whose only singularities are poles and branch cuts; causality makes the amplitude analytic, unitarity creates a branch cut on the real axis above the production threshold, and poles on the physical sheet below threshold are bound states. On unphysical sheets, complex poles appear in conjugate pairs, and their positions give the mass and width through $\sqrt{s_*}=M-i\Gamma/2$, while the residue gives the coupling $g^2$. The review derives the partial-wave unitarity condition for equal-mass scalar scattering and explains that Breit-Wigner, Flatt\'e-like, $K$-matrix, and unitarized amplitudes are all parametrizations built to encode this same analytic structure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the scattering amplitude is an analytic function with only pole and branch-cut singularities, with that analyticity inherited from causality; the review cites formal arguments for this rather than proving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mass and width of any unstable hadron are fixed by the pole position $\sqrt{s_*}=M-i\Gamma/2$, so the same numbers must emerge from any reaction that couples to the state.
  • Bound states, virtual bound states, and resonances become one family of objects, distinguished only by where their poles sit relative to thresholds and on which Riemann sheet they live.
  • Unitarity fixes the discontinuity across the threshold cut, which is why amplitude forms that implement unitarity (Breit-Wigner, Flatt\'e-like forms, $K$-matrix, unitarized amplitudes) can be continued to the unphysical sheet to locate poles.
  • Varying QCD parameters such as the pion mass moves poles continuously, so a resonance can transmute into a virtual state and then a bound state as the parameters change.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader could infer from the pole picture that the spread of pole positions returned by different amplitude analyses is itself a measurable systematic uncertainty; comparing those spreads would test how close the community is to the universal-parameter limit.
  • One extension the review leaves implicit is applying the same pole-residue language to the $Q^2$-dependent helicity amplitudes that define transition form factors, turning off-shell couplings into residues at moving poles.
  • A further testable extension is three-body unitarity: if universal pole parameters exist, then three-body amplitude decompositions using different isobar bases must yield the same pole positions, and checking that invariance would tighten the connection between the pole formalism and three-body resonances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a pedagogical review of the theory of resonances, aimed at the hadron spectroscopy community. It traces the historical development from atomic excited states to modern hadron resonances, surveys the theoretical (lattice QCD, functional methods, chiral perturbation theory) and experimental landscape, and focuses on the modern definition of resonance parameters via the analytic structure of the S-matrix. After deriving the partial-wave unitarity condition in a simplified scalar model, the paper shows that resonance poles on unphysical Riemann sheets encode the mass, width, and coupling (Eq. 11). It then reviews amplitude parametrizations (Breit-Wigner, Flatté, K-matrix, chiral unitary) and applications to compositeness, quark-mass trajectories, and transition form factors.

Significance. The material is standard but well-presented, and the paper fills a useful niche as an entry point for students and researchers into pole-based hadron spectroscopy. The derivations are mostly explicit and the references are comprehensive. The central claim—that resonance parameters are universal once defined via S-matrix poles—is uncontroversial and supported by the cited literature. The paper also demonstrates the unified treatment of bound states, virtual states, and resonances, and connects to modern lattice results. However, a normalization inconsistency in the partial-wave unitarity/phase-shift relations needs to be fixed; it does not invalidate the central pole-extraction claim but does affect the pedagogical correctness of a key section.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (10) and (16)] The partial-wave normalization is internally inconsistent. Equation (10) gives Disc T_lm(s) = i p/(4π√s) |T_lm(s)|^2, which implies Im T = ρ |T|^2 with ρ = p/(8π√s). For a unitary S-matrix this corresponds to S_l = 1 + 2iρ T_l, not S_l = 1 + iT_l. However, Eq. (16) states 1 + iT_l(s) = e^{2iδ_l(s)} = S_l(s). Substituting T_l = 2e^{iδ} sin δ into Eq. (10) forces ρ = 1/2, i.e., p = 4π√s, which is not generally true. The K-matrix formula Eq. (15) is correct for the standard amplitude t_l = (S_l − 1)/(2iρ), but the identification in Eq. (16) is wrong by a factor of 2ρ. Please correct Eq. (16), or the schematic definition Eq. (1), so that the unitarity relation, the K-matrix relation, and the phase-shift relation are mutually consistent.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, item 2(b)] The sentence 'Besides bound states poles at real energies below production thresholds, the complex plane is pole-free' should specify 'on the physical Riemann sheet' to avoid contradicting the later discussion of resonance poles on unphysical sheets.
  2. [Section 1] In the introduction, 'appearing ar ratios of whole numbers' should read 'appearing as ratios of whole numbers'.
  3. [Section 3] The phrase 'a dumped pendulum' should be 'a damped pendulum', and 'spheric harmonics' should be 'spherical harmonics'.
  4. [Section 3] The word 'residuum' is unusual; the standard term in this context is 'residue'.
  5. [Section 4.2] In the first paragraph, 'genral' should be 'general'.
  6. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase 'provide first glimpse' would be smoother as 'provide a first glimpse'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the pole-based resonance parameter framework is a standard S-matrix review with external formal references; self-citations are illustrative only.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that resonance parameters are encoded in the pole position and residue of the analytically continued scattering amplitude (Eq. 11)—is presented as a pedagogical review of established S-matrix theory, not as a new first-principles derivation. The partial-wave unitarity condition (Eq. 10) is derived explicitly from the S-matrix unitarity relation (Eq. 2) via angular projection and phase-space evaluation, with no assumed result being repackaged as an output. Equation (11) defines M, Gamma, and g^2 in terms of the pole and residue; this is a conventional definition, not a prediction, and the paper does not claim otherwise. The analyticity premise is stated as following from causality and is supported by formal references [40,41,43–45]; the only self-citation in this context, Ref. [14], is a companion review used for an outline, while the technical proofs are external. Applications such as the f0(500) pole trajectory in Fig. 4 are explicitly described as model-dependent post-dictions fitted to lattice QCD, and they serve as illustrations rather than load-bearing evidence for the framework. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against independently established results, and no circular step can be exhibited by reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review relies on standard pillars of S-matrix theory: analyticity, unitarity, and crossing symmetry. These are not new postulates. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption S-matrix element is a meromorphic function of kinematic variables with only bound-state poles on the physical sheet below threshold.
    Stated in Section 3, item 2 (Analyticity), citing causality arguments and references [14, 40-45].
  • standard math Unitarity of the S-matrix, SS^dagger = 1, and the consequent discontinuity relations.
    Used throughout Section 3 to derive partial-wave unitarity and K-matrix forms.
  • domain assumption Existence of a convergent perturbative expansion in quantum field theory and renormalizability of the loop functions.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 when introducing the Bethe-Salpeter equation and the unitarized amplitudes.
  • standard math Schwarz reflection principle T*(s) = T(s*) for the scattering amplitude.
    Used in Section 3 to derive the partial-wave unitarity condition in Eq. (10).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of resonances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K3KVN3LW

@misc{pith2026250202654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of resonances},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K3KVN3LW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02654}
}
abstract

We give a pedagogical introduction to the theory of resonances, focusing specifically on the spectrum of excited strongly interacting particles. After providing historical context starting from the atomic theory, we summarize the status of theoretical and experimental research. We discuss then the methodology to determine universal resonance parameter through the analytical properties of the transition amplitudes. For this, the main aspects of the $S$-matrix theory are introduced including some explicit calculations in simplified cases. In the last section, we summarize several frequently used amplitude types also making a connection to Effective Field Theories, as well as provide first glimpse into some more advanced applications to further resonance properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal parameters of the $\Lambda(1380)$, the $\Lambda(1405)$ and their isospin partners from a combined analysis of Lattice QCD and experimental results

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A combined global fit of lattice QCD spectra and experimental Kbar N data within chiral unitary approaches gives pole positions for the Lambda(1380) and Lambda(1405) at physical and lattice quark masses, with systemat...

  2. Eigenstates in coupled-channel scattering amplitude and their effects on spectrum

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In coupled-channel scattering, the observable above-threshold resonance originates from the virtual-state pole, while the subthreshold quasibound state becomes a shadow pole, an interchange shown and applied to Xi resonances.

  3. A beginner's guide to functional methods in particle physics

    hep-ph 2025-10 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    A pedagogical review showing how Dyson-Schwinger, 3PI, and Bethe-Salpeter equations can be chained together to compute glueball masses in pure Yang-Mills theory, matching lattice QCD.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    John Dalton, A new system of chemical philosophy (v. 2; pt. 1) (1808), doi: 10.5479/sil.324338.39088000885681

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    J. J. Thomson, Cathode rays, Phil. Mag. Ser. 5 44 (1897) 293–316, doi: 10.1080/14786449708621070

    work page doi:10.1080/14786449708621070

  3. [3]

    Rutherford, The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom, Phil

    E. Rutherford, The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom, Phil. Mag. Ser. 6 21 (1911) 669–688, doi:10.1080/14786440508637080

    doi:10.1080/14786440508637080 1911

  4. [4]

    Murray Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214–215, doi: 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

    doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64)92001-3 1964

  5. [5]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1 (1964), doi: 10.17181/CERN-TH-401

    doi:10.17181/cern-th-401 1964

  6. [6]

    Bloom, et al., High-Energy Inelastic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees, Phys

    Elliott D. Bloom, et al., High-Energy Inelastic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 930–934, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.930

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.930 1969

  7. [7]

    Werner Heisenberg, Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations, Harper & Row 1972, ISBN 978-0061316227

    1972

  8. [8]

    Wigner, Resonance Reactions and Anomalous Scattering, Phys

    Eugene P . Wigner, Resonance Reactions and Anomalous Scattering, Phys. Rev. 70 (1946) 15–33, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.15

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.70.15 1946

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Navas, et al

    S. Navas, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Wigner, Relativistic Invariance and Quantum Phenomena, Rev

    Eugene P . Wigner, Relativistic Invariance and Quantum Phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957) 255–268, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.255

    1957 doi

  3. [11]

    Michel Talagrand, What Is a Quantum Field Theory?, Cambridge University Press 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Gross, Frank Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys

    David J. Gross, Frank Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343–1346, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.30.1343

    1973

  5. [13]

    David Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys

    H. David Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30. 1346

    1973 doi

  6. [14]

    Meißner, Carsten Urbach, Towards a theory of hadron resonances, Phys

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, Carsten Urbach, Towards a theory of hadron resonances, Phys. Rept. 1001 (2023) 1–66, doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2022.11.005, 2206.01477

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Fischer, Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states, Prog

    Gernot Eichmann, Helios Sanchis-Alepuz, Richard Williams, Reinhard Alkofer, Christian S. Fischer, Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91 (2016) 1–100, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.07.001, 1606.09602

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Steven Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1-2) (1979) 327–340, doi: 10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1

    1979 doi

  9. [17]

    Gasser, H

    J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465–516, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90492-4

    1985 doi

  10. [18]

    Gasser, H

    J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142, doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2

    1984 doi

  11. [19]

    Meissner, Chiral perturbation theory, Ann

    Veronique Bernard, Ulf-G. Meissner, Chiral perturbation theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 33–60, doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.56. 080805.140449, hep-ph/0611231

    2007

  12. [20]

    Veronique Bernard, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Baryon Properties, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 60 (2008) 82–160, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2007. 07.001, 0706.0312

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Stefan Scherer, Introduction to chiral perturbation theory, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27 (2003) 277, hep-ph/0210398

    2003 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Meissner, Recent developments in chiral perturbation theory, Rept

    Ulf G. Meissner, Recent developments in chiral perturbation theory, Rept. Prog. Phys. 56 (1993) 903–996, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/56/8/001, hep-ph/9302247

    1993 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. R. Pelaez, From controversy to precision on the sigma meson: a review on the status of the non-ordinary f0(500) resonance, Phys. Rept. 658 (2016) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.001, 1510.00653

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J ¨orn Bleck-Neuhaus, Mechanical resonance: 300 years from discovery to the full understanding of its importance 2018, 1811.08353, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08353

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Aad, et al

    G. Aad, et al. (ATLAS), The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST 3 (2008) S08003, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/ S08003

    2008 doi

  18. [26]

    (KLF), Strange Hadron Spectroscopy with Secondary KL Beam in Hall D (2020), 2008.08215

    Moskov Amaryan, et al. (KLF), Strange Hadron Spectroscopy with Secondary KL Beam in Hall D (2020), 2008.08215. 10 Theory of resonances

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hillert, The Bonn electron stretcher accelerator ELSA: Past and future, Eur

    W. Hillert, The Bonn electron stretcher accelerator ELSA: Past and future, Eur. Phys. J. A 28S1 (2006) 139–148, doi: 10.1140/epja/ i2006-09-015-4

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    B. A. Mecking, et al. (CLAS), The CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 503 (2003) 513–553, doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01001-5

    2003 doi

  21. [29]

    Annika Thiel, Farah Afzal, Y annick Wunderlich, Light Baryon Spectroscopy, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125 (2022) 103949, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp. 2022.103949, 2202.05055

    2022

  22. [30]

    A Braghieri, et al., Total cross-section measurement for the three double pion production channels on the proton, Phys. Lett. B 363 (1995) 46–50, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01189-W

    1995 doi

  23. [31]

    Struczinski, et al

    W. Struczinski, et al. (Aachen-Hamburg-Heidelberg-Munich), Study of photoproduction on hydrogen in a streamer chamber with tagged photons for 1.6 GeV < Eγ < 6.3 GeV Topological and reaction cross sections, Nucl. Phys. B 108 (1976) 45–74, doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(76) 90123-1

    1976 doi

  24. [32]

    (CB-ELSA), Photoproduction of eta mesons off protons for 0.75-GeV < E(gamma)< 3-GeV, Phys

    Volker Crede, et al. (CB-ELSA), Photoproduction of eta mesons off protons for 0.75-GeV < E(gamma)< 3-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 012004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.012004, hep-ex/0311045

    2005 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bartholomy, et al

    O. Bartholomy, et al. (CB-ELSA), Neutral pion photoproduction off protons in the energy range 0.3-GeV < E(gamma)< 3-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 012003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.012003, hep-ex/0407022

    2005 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Wu, et al., Photoproduction of rho0 mesons and Delta-baryons in the reaction gamma p — > p pi+ pi- at energies up to s**(1/2) = 2.6-GeV, Eur

    C. Wu, et al., Photoproduction of rho0 mesons and Delta-baryons in the reaction gamma p — > p pi+ pi- at energies up to s**(1/2) = 2.6-GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 23 (2005) 317–344, doi:10.1140/epja/i2004-10093-9

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    Thoma, et al., N* and Delta* decays into N pi0 pi0, Phys

    U. Thoma, et al., N* and Delta* decays into N pi0 pi0, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 87–93, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.054, 0707.3592

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Crede, et al

    V. Crede, et al. (CBELSA/TAPS), Photoproduction of eta and eta-prime mesons off protons, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 055202, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevC.80.055202, 0909.1248

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Schumann, et al., Radiative pi0 photoproduction on protons in the Delta+(1232) region, Eur

    S. Schumann, et al., Radiative pi0 photoproduction on protons in the Delta+(1232) region, Eur. Phys. J. A 43 (2010) 269–282, doi: 10.1140/ epja/i2010-10925-y, 1001.3626

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    E. F . McNicoll, et al. (Crystal Ball at MAMI), Study of the γp−>η p reaction with the Crystal Ball detector at the Mainz Microtron(MAMI-C), Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 035208, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.029901, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 84, 029901 (2011)], 1007.0777

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Heisenberg, THE ’OBSERVABLE QUANTITIES’ IN THE THEORY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES (1943)

    W. Heisenberg, THE ’OBSERVABLE QUANTITIES’ IN THE THEORY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES (1943)

    1943

  32. [40]

    Vladimir Gribov, Strong Interactions of Hadrons at High Energies: Gribov Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press 2008, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511534942

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    Landshoff, David I

    Richard John Eden, Peter V. Landshoff, David I. Olive, John Charlton Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge 1966, ISBN 978-0-521-04869-9

    1966

  34. [42]

    G. H ¨ohler, Methods and Results of Phenomenological Analyses / Methoden und Ergebnisse ph ¨anomenologischer Analysen, Landolt- Boernstein - Group I Elementary Particles, Nuclei and Atoms, vol. 9b2, Springer 1983, ISBN 978-3-540-11282-2, 978-3-540-39059-6, doi:10.1007/b19946

    1983 doi

  35. [43]

    N. G. van Kampen, S-Matrix and Causality Condition. I. Maxwell Field, Phys. Rev. 89 (1953) 1072–1079, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.89.1072

    1953 doi

  36. [44]

    G. R. Screaton, Analyticity and causality. ii, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969) 1415–1420, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.182.1415

    1969 doi

  37. [45]

    Minerbo, Causality and analyticity in formal scattering theory, Phys

    G. Minerbo, Causality and analyticity in formal scattering theory, Phys. Rev. D 3 (1971) 928–932, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.928

    1971 doi

  38. [46]

    M. Mai, B. Hu, M. Doring, A. Pilloni, A. Szczepaniak, Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (9) (2017) 177, doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12368-4, 1706.06118

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Yuchuan Feng, Fernando Gil, Michael D ¨oring, Raquel Molina, Maxim Mai, Vanamali Shastry, Adam Szczepaniak, A unitary coupled- channel three-body amplitude with pions and kaons (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094002, 2407.08721

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ananthanarayan, G

    B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Roy equation analysis of pi pi scattering, Phys. Rept. 353 (2001) 207–279, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00009-6, hep-ph/0005297

    2001 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Jacob, G

    M. Jacob, G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys. 7 (1959) 404–428, doi: 10.1006/aphy.2000. 6022

    1959 doi

  42. [50]

    Kennedy, T

    J. Kennedy, T. D. Spearman, Singularities in Partial-Wave Amplitudes for Two Ingoing and Two Outgoing Particles, Phys. Rev. 126 (4) (1962) 1596–1602, doi:10.1103/physrev.126.1596

    1962 doi

  43. [51]

    Scott Willenbrock, Mass and width of an unstable particle, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 (6) (2024) 523, doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05301-0 , 2203.11056

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Flatte, Coupled - Channel Analysis of the pi eta and K anti-K Systems Near K anti-K Threshold, Phys

    Stanley M. Flatte, Coupled - Channel Analysis of the pi eta and K anti-K Systems Near K anti-K Threshold, Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 224–227, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90654-7

    1976 doi

  45. [53]

    Kerbikov, A Remark on the effective range approach to the f0 - a0 mesons, Phys

    B. Kerbikov, A Remark on the effective range approach to the f0 - a0 mesons, Phys. Lett. B 596 (2004) 200–204, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb. 2004.06.084, hep-ph/0402022

    2004 arXiv

  46. [54]

    V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Alexander Evgenyevich Kudryavtsev, Ulf-G. Meissner, Flatte-like distributions and the a(0)(980) / f(0)(980) mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A 23 (2005) 523–533, doi:10.1140/epja/i2004-10105-x, nucl-th/0410099

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Xiang-Kun Dong, Feng-Kun Guo, Bing-Song Zou, Explaining the Many Threshold Structures in the Heavy-Quark Hadron Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (15) (2021) 152001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.152001, 2011.14517

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Katsuyoshi Sone, Tetsuo Hyodo, General amplitude of near-threshold hadron scattering for exotic hadrons (2024), 2405.08436

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Baker, Peter Graves-Morris, Pad ´e Approximants, second ed., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press 1996

    George A. Baker, Peter Graves-Morris, Pad ´e Approximants, second ed., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press 1996

    1996

  50. [58]

    R. H. Dalitz, T. C. Wong, G. Rajasekaran, Model calculation for Y*(0) (1405) resonance state, Phys. Rev. 153 (1967) 1617–1623, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.153.1617

    1967 doi

  51. [59]

    Maxim Mai, Review of the Λ(1405) A curious case of a strangeness resonance, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (6) (2021) 1593–1607, doi: 10.1140/ epjs/s11734-021-00144-7 , 2010.00056

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Nozawa, B

    S. Nozawa, B. Blankleider, T. S. H. Lee, A Dynamical Model of Pion Photoproduction on the Nucleon, Nucl. Phys. A 513 (1990) 459–510, doi:10.1016/0375-9474(90)90395-3

    1990 doi

  53. [61]

    T. S. H. Lee, B. C. Pearce, Meson exchange calculation of the gamma N — > pi N reaction, Nucl. Phys. A 530 (1991) 532–538, doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(91)90767-Z

    1991 doi

  54. [62]

    C. H. M. van Antwerpen, I. R. Afnan, A Gauge invariant unitary theory for pion photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995) 554–567, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.52.554, nucl-th/9407038

    1995 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Borasoy, P

    B. Borasoy, P . C. Bruns, U. G. Meissner, R. Nissler, Gauge invariance in two-particle scattering, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 065201, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.065201, hep-ph/0508307

    2005 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bruns, Maxim Mai, Ulf G

    Peter C. Bruns, Maxim Mai, Ulf G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics of the S11(1535) and S11(1650) resonances revisited, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 254–259, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.008, 1012.2233. Theory of resonances 11

    2011 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Meissner,η-Photoproduction in a gauge-invariant chiral unitary framework, Phys

    Dino Rui ´c, Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meissner,η-Photoproduction in a gauge-invariant chiral unitary framework, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 659–662, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.090, 1108.4825

    2011 arXiv

  58. [66]

    thesis, Bonn U

    Maxim Mai, From meson-baryon scattering to meson photoproduction, Ph.D. thesis, Bonn U. 2013

    2013

  59. [67]

    Franz Gross, Three-dimensional covariant integral equations for low-energy systems, Phys. Rev. 186 (1969) 1448–1462, doi: 10.1103/ PhysRev.186.1448

    1969

  60. [68]

    J. A. Oller, Ulf G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon interactions revisited, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 263–272, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00078-8, hep-ph/0011146

    2001 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Shao-Feng Ge, Ui Min, Zhuoni Qian, Verifying the resonance schemes of unstable particles at lepton colliders, Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025) 139269, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139269, 2410.15890

    2025

  62. [70]

    Meißner, Qian Wang, Qiang Zhao, Bing-Song Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev

    Feng-Kun Guo, Christoph Hanhart, Ulf-G. Meißner, Qian Wang, Qiang Zhao, Bing-Song Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015004, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], 1705.00141

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, Xiang Liu, Y an-Rui Liu, Shi-Lin Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2) (2023) 026201, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6, 2204.02649

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lu Meng, Bo Wang, Guang-Juan Wang, Shi-Lin Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1–149, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.003, 2204.08716

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Steven Weinberg, Evidence That the Deuteron Is Not an Elementary Particle, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B672–B678, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137. B672

    1965 doi

  66. [74]

    J. C. Houard, B. Jouvet, Etude d’un mod `ele de champ `aconstante de renormalisation nulle, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 18 (3) (1960) 466–481, doi:10.1007/BF02732720, URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732720

    1960 doi

  67. [75]

    M. T. Vaughn, R. Aaron, R. D. Amado, Elementary and Composite Particles, Phys. Rev. 124 (4) (1961) 1258–1268, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev. 124.1258

    1961 doi

  68. [76]

    Y an Li, Feng-Kun Guo, Jin-Yi Pang, Jia-Jun Wu, Generalization of Weinberg’s compositeness relations, Phys. Rev. D 105 (7) (2022) L071502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L071502, 2110.02766

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Takayasu Sekihara, Tetsuo Hyodo, Daisuke Jido, Comprehensive analysis of the wave function of a hadronic resonance and its compos- iteness, PTEP 2015 (2015) 063D04, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv081, 1411.2308

    2015 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Tetsuo Hyodo, Daisuke Jido, Atsushi Hosaka, Compositeness of dynamically generated states in a chiral unitary approach, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 015201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.015201, 1108.5524

    2012 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Tetsuo Hyodo, Structure and compositeness of hadron resonances, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330045, doi: 10.1142/ S0217751X13300457, 1310.1176

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    J. A. Oller, New results from a number operator interpretation of the compositeness of bound and resonant states, Annals Phys. 396 (2018) 429–458, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.07.023, 1710.00991

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Tomona Kinugawa, Tetsuo Hyodo, Compositeness of hadrons, nuclei, and atomic systems (2024), 2411.12285

    2024

  74. [82]

    Maxim Mai, Michael D ¨oring, Akaki Rusetsky, Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (6) (2021) 1623–1643, doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00146-5 , 2103.00577

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Dehua Guo, Andrei Alexandru, Raquel Molina, Maxim Mai, Michael D ¨oring, Extraction of isoscalarππ phase-shifts from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 98 (1) (2018) 014507, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014507, 1803.02897

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Lee, Cross-channel study of pion scattering from lattice QCD, Phys

    Maxim Mai, Chris Culver, Andrei Alexandru, Michael D ¨oring, Frank X. Lee, Cross-channel study of pion scattering from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 100 (11) (2019) 114514, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114514, 1908.01847

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    (Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Two-Pole Nature of the Λ(1405) resonance from Lattice QCD, Phys

    John Bulava, et al. (Baryon Scattering (BaSc)), Two-Pole Nature of the Λ(1405) resonance from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (5) (2024) 051901, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.051901, 2307.10413

    2024

  78. [86]

    Meißner, New insights into the nature of the Λ(1380) and Λ(1405) resonances away from the SU(3) limit, Phys

    Feng-Kun Guo, Yuki Kamiya, Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, New insights into the nature of the Λ(1380) and Λ(1405) resonances away from the SU(3) limit, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138264, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138264, 2308.07658

    2023

  79. [87]

    Zejian Zhuang, Raquel Molina, Jun-Xu Lu, Li-Sheng Geng, Pole trajectories of the Λ(1405) helps establish its dynamical nature (2024), 2405.07686

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Meißner, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, Carsten Urbach,ω Meson from Lattice QCD, Phys

    Haobo Y an, Maxim Mai, Marco Garofalo, Ulf-G. Meißner, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, Carsten Urbach,ω Meson from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (21) (2024) 211906, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.211906, 2407.16659

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Meißner, Deborah R¨onchen, Ronald Workman (J¨ulich- Bonn-Washington), Global Data-Driven Determination of Baryon Transition Form Factors, Phys

    Yu-Fei Wang, Michael D ¨oring, Jackson Hergenrather, Maxim Mai, Terry Mart, Ulf-G. Meißner, Deborah R¨onchen, Ronald Workman (J¨ulich- Bonn-Washington), Global Data-Driven Determination of Baryon Transition Form Factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (10) (2024) 101901, doi: 10.1103/Ph...

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    D. S. Carman, et al. (CLAS), First measurement of transferred polarization in the exclusive polarized-e p —> e-prime K+ polarized-Lambda reaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 131804, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.131804, hep-ex/0212014

    2003 arXiv

  83. [91]

    D. S. Carman, et al. (CLAS), Beam-recoil transferred polarization in K+Y electroproduction in the nucleon resonance region with CLAS12, Phys. Rev. C 105 (6) (2022) 065201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.065201, 2202.03398

    2022 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Nasseripour, et al

    R. Nasseripour, et al. (CLAS), Polarized Structure Function sigma(LT -prime) for p(polarized-e, e-prime K+) Lambda in the Nucleon Reso- nance Region, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 065208, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.065208, 0801.4711

    2008 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Berends, A

    Frits A. Berends, A. Donnachie, D. L. Weaver, Photoproduction and electroproduction of pions. 1. Dispersion relation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 4 (1967) 1–53, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(67)90196-4

    1967 doi

  86. [94]

    Ramalho, M

    G. Ramalho, M. T. Pe ˜na, Electromagnetic transition form factors of baryon resonances, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136 (2024) 104097, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104097, 2306.13900

    2024

  87. [95]

    Tiator, D

    L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, M. Vanderhaeghen, Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID, Chin. Phys. C 33 (2009) 1069–1076, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/33/12/005, 0909.2335

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.