Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

On the Underlying Nonrelativistic Nature of Relativistic Holography

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that standard AdS/CFT holography is exactly the statement of open-string/closed-string duality inside a nonrelativistic D3-brane theory, so the celebrated near-horizon limit and the nonrelativistic D3-brane limit are one…

desk verdict A clean synthesis, but the central reinterpretation is a conjecture pending the missing NRD3 formulation. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03031 v3 pith:HK3OLZFA submitted 2025-02-05 hep-th

Alberto Guijosa This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 83E3081T3581T60 PACS 11.25.Tq11.25.-w04.65.+e
keywords nonrelativisticstringtheoryAdS/CFTcorrespondenceNewton-CartangeometryD3-branesblackbranesholographyMatrixT-Tbardeformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the familiar relativistic holographic correspondence is, at bottom, a statement about nonrelativistic branes: a stack of N D3-branes in a ten-dimensional flat Newton-Cartan spacetime has exactly the same alternative description as an asymptotically flat Newton-Cartan RR black 3-brane. On the D3-brane side this worldvolume theory is N=4 super Yang-Mills, and on the gravity side the black 3-brane is AdS5×S5, so the claim is that AdS/CFT is precisely D-brane/black-brane (open-string/closed-string) duality inside the nonrelativistic theory. The load-bearing step is the identity between Maldacena's near-horizon limit and the nonrelativistic D3-brane limit, which turns the outer Minkowski region into a flat 3-brane Newton-Cartan region rather than removing it. A sympathetic reader would care because the argument recasts the strongest known form of gauge/gravity duality as an example of a simpler mechanical duality, and it gives Newton-Cartan geometry the role of the substrate on which entanglement builds relativistic spacetime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nonrelativistic D3-brane (NRD3) limit, the p=3 case of the scaling (29) that defines nonrelativistic Dp-brane theories; applied to the extremal black 3-brane it drops the constant 1 in the harmonic function and produces exactly the AdS5×S5 metric. The argument also relies on the p-brane Newton-Cartan (pNC) geometry, a foliated spacetime structure with distinguished longitudinal and transverse directions, and on the earlier finding that black branes in nonrelativistic string theory are only asymptotically Newton-Cartan, with an inner relativistic bubble sourced by positively-wound F1s. The named mechanism carrying the argument is the statement that the NRD3 limit and Maldacena's near-horizon limit are identical, so that the open-string/closed-string duality for D3-branes (37) survives the limit as the equivalence (39) inside the nonrelativistic theory.

What would settle it

Compute the action of a single D3-brane probe moving far out into the asymptotic region of AdS5×S5: the paper predicts the quadratic, nonrelativistic action (44). If the probe's action instead retains the relativistic DBI form at arbitrarily large radius, or if one finds asymptotic states there with negative D3 charge or unwound strings, the identification of AdS5×S5 as an asymptotically flat 3NC black brane would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the nonrelativistic D3-brane limit of Type IIB string theory is exactly the same limit that produces the gravitational side of AdS/CFT, so AdS5×S5 is not merely a relativistic supergravity background but the RR black 3-brane of the nonrelativistic D3-brane theory, with an asymptotically flat 3-brane Newton-Cartan region and a relativistic interior. The paper expresses this as statement (39): NRD3 theory on a stack of N D3-branes in flat ten-dimensional 3NC spacetime equals NRD3 theory on the asymptotically flat 3NC RR black 3-brane. It follows, the paper claims, that N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills is exactly the worldvolume theory of D3-branes within NRD3 theory, that the near-horizon limit does not discard the ambient ten dimensions but converts them from Lorentzian to Newton-Cartan, and that the familiar GKPW recipe computes scattering of off-shell Newtonian gravitons off the D3-branes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a theory is fixed by its equations of motion together with its boundary conditions, so the flat 3NC asymptotics of AdS5×S5 make it a state of the nonrelativistic D3-brane theory even though the interior satisfies the equations of relativistic supergravity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The standard gauge/gravity dictionary for D3-branes can be translated, without loss, into the language of nonrelativistic D3-brane theory: the field theory side is U(N) MSYM, and the bulk side is an asymptotically flat 3NC black 3-brane.
  • The infinite region beyond the AdS conformal boundary is not wasted: objects carrying positive D3 charge can leave the relativistic bubble and move through the flat Newton-Cartan region, so the notion of 'bulk' is reversed relative to the usual AdS/CFT picture.
  • Correlation functions computed by the GKPW recipe are reinterpreted as scattering amplitudes of Newtonian gravitons, the off-shell massless modes of NRD3 theory, off the D3-branes.
  • Separating the D3s into several stacks disassembles AdS5×S5 into relativistic bubbles immersed in flat 3NC geometry, and scattering of these bubbles is the Matrix-theory-type D3 scattering amplitude.
  • Entanglement entropy computed by the Ryu-Takayanagi formula directly on the pure flat 3NC geometry vanishes, indicating that the Newton-Cartan substrate is not itself built from entanglement; entanglement among D3 degrees of freedom builds the relativistic AdS5×S5 spacetime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, the holographic dictionary may be largely expressible from within nonrelativistic brane theory, which could supply a UV-complete framework for holography analogous to Matrix theory; this is a direction the paper gestures at but does not develop.
  • A testable extension is to derive the explicit worldvolume-covariant MSYM action on flat 3NC space; the paper notes this action is not currently known, and its absence is the sharpest technical gap in the reinterpretation.
  • The same reasoning should apply to M2-, M5-, and NS5-based holography and to intersecting-brane examples such as AdS3×S3×T4, so the nonrelativistic reading is not an accident of the D3 case but a general feature of brane-based dualities.
  • One could try to observe the predicted nonrelativistic escape of D3 probes by computing subleading corrections to the probe action (44); a relativistic correction surviving at large radius would challenge the asymptotically-3NC interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that standard relativistic holography is, at bottom, a statement in nonrelativistic brane theory. The author combines the recent result that the NRDp limit is identical to the near-horizon limit of Dp-brane holography with the earlier 'relativistic bubble in asymptotically SNC space' picture, and concludes that AdS/CFT should be read as open-string/closed-string duality inside NRD3 theory: a stack of D3-branes in flat 10-dimensional 3NC spacetime is equivalent to an asymptotically 3NC RR black 3-brane, with AdS5×S5 as the bubble. Sections 2 and 3 review NRF1, SNC/pNC geometry, the black string, and the RR black p-brane, and Section 4 draws consequences for probes, internal space, center-of-mass U(1), Coulomb branch, GKPW correlators, and entanglement entropy.

Significance. If correct, the reinterpretation is significant: it would unify the near-horizon limit with the nonrelativistic limit, explain long/short string behavior in AdS3 via bubble membership, identify GKPW correlators with Newtonian-graviton scattering, and recast NC geometry as the pre-geometric substrate on which holographic spacetime is built. The paper introduces no new free parameters and leans on independent work [15] for the identity of limits; it also offers explicit probe computations (Sec. 4.3) and RT calculations (Sec. 4.12) that are consistent with the advertised picture. The main reservation is that the core equivalence (39) requires an as-yet-unwritten NRD3 bulk action or an intrinsic definition of NRD3 on curved pNC backgrounds; without that ingredient the paper is a compelling conditional synthesis rather than a derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.7, Eq. (36)] The central assertion that AdS5×S5 is a black 3-brane in NRD3 theory is not supported by an explicit NRD3 bulk action or worldsheet/sigma-model formulation whose equations of motion or beta functions are solved by (36). The paper's principle that a theory is defined by equations of motion plus boundary conditions (Sections 2.4 and 4.7) is insufficiently implemented: the full asymptotic data for the metric, RR fields, and dilaton are never specified, and Section 4.2 explicitly concedes that the covariant MSYM action on 3NC is unknown. This missing formulation is load-bearing, because without it the reinterpretation (39) cannot exclude that AdS5×S5 is just a solution of the parent relativistic Type IIB theory.
  2. [§4.7, Eqs. (31) and (36)] The identification of the asymptopia as flat 3NC relies on the formal replacement ω = r^2/L^2 when comparing (31) with (36). The resulting longitudinal vielbein τ^A = (r/L)dx^A satisfies dτ^A = (1/L)dr ∧ dx^A ≠ 0, and the transverse vielbein E_{A'} = (L/r)∂_{A'} is non-closed as well, so the geometry is not flat 3NC in an invariant, torsion-free sense; moreover the S^5 factor remains curved. Hence the 'flat 3NC asymptotics' act as coordinate bookkeeping rather than as an independently defined asymptotic boundary condition. The paper should either give an invariant characterization of the asymptopia, for example via pNC torsion and curvature fall-offs, or weaken the claim that the asymptotics select NRD3 uniquely.
  3. [§3.2, Eqs. (34)-(39)] The equivalence (39) is a conditional reformulation of [15] rather than an independent derivation. The striking identity between the NRDp limit and Maldacena's near-horizon limit is an input from [15]; what still needs to be established is that the resulting pNC description is a statement within NRDp theory itself, not merely a relabeling of the relativistic parent theory. Since the only curved-space definition offered is the scaling condition (33), and no NRD3 action is written down, the paper should either provide such a definition or explicitly state Eq. (39) as a conjecture whose proof requires the missing NRD3 formulation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.6] There are typographical errors: 'tha there is noa priori' should read 'that there is no a priori'.
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption of Figure 7 appears to say 'right' twice in the bottom sentence; the first occurrence should presumably be 'left'.
  3. [Eq. (47)] The notation \hat{C}_{01234} for a 4-form component is nonstandard; write \hat{C}_{0123} or explain the index convention.
  4. [§4.12] In Eq. (51) the limit parameter ω is used as if it were a finite regulator in the pure 3NC geometry; since in the intrinsic N=0 theory no such parameter exists, clarify that ω is a bookkeeping cutoff or rewrite the area in terms of physical cutoff lengths.
  5. [Footnote 19] The redefinition r ≡ r0 + r in footnote 19 reuses the same symbol r, which is confusing; use r = r0 + ρ or a similar relabeling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central AdS/CFT = NRD3 duality re-expresses the known open/closed duality using the independent limit identity of [15].

full rationale

The paper's central equivalence (39) is obtained by taking the known open-string/closed-string duality (37) and applying the limit (31), which is shown in [15] to be identical to Maldacena's near-horizon limit. That limit identity is an independent input (Blair-Lahnsteiner-Obers-Yan), not a result of the present author's prior work. Equation (36) follows from (35) by a direct coordinate rescaling, and the identification omega = r^2/L^2 is an asymptotic matching, not a fitted parameter. The author's own papers [10,11] are used to describe the interior of the black brane as a relativistic bubble; this is an interpretive overlay that does not do the work of proving (39), which would survive if the bubble language were removed. The zero-entropy calculation in Section 4.12 is explicitly a consistency check ('as expected from the complete lack of degrees of freedom'), not a prediction that is then used as an input. The paper explicitly acknowledges a technical gap—the covariant MSYM action on flat 3NC space is not known (Section 4.2)—and the flat-3NC asymptotics are identified formally via omega = r^2/L^2 (Section 4.7); these are completeness or formulation issues, not cases where a conclusion is equivalent to its premise by construction. No equation is defined in terms of the result it purports to derive, and no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper. The length scales L are combinations of N, g_s, l_s from string theory, not adjusted to data. The core axioms are domain assumptions inherited from [15] and [10,11]; the boundary-condition principle is the main paper-specific premise. No new physical entities are introduced; the relativistic bubble is a schematic region, not a new object.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The NRDp limit (29) is exactly the near-horizon limit of Dp-brane holography.
    Taken from [15]; the paper reviews the application to the D3-brane and obtains AdS5×S5, but the general equivalence for all p and for M2/M5 is assumed from that reference. See Section 3.2.
  • ad hoc to paper A theory is defined by its equations of motion together with its boundary conditions; the flat 3NC asymptotics select NRD3 theory on AdS5×S5.
    Stated in Sections 2.4 and 4.7; this is the interpretive premise that turns AdS5×S5 from a relativistic supergravity solution into a state of NRD3 theory.
  • domain assumption The λλbar deformation sourced by wound strings and branes generates the inner relativistic bubble.
    From [10,11]; used in Sections 2.4-2.5 to interpret the black brane as a bubble in flat SNC/3NC, and via U-duality to apply to AdS5×S5 in Section 4.7.
  • domain assumption The RT formula applies to pure 3NC backgrounds and zero entropy follows from absence of D3-branes.
    Assumed in Section 4.12; the computation is a consistency check, not a derivation of the RT formula in non-Lorentzian geometries.
  • domain assumption The worldvolume theory of a stack of N D3-branes in NRD3 is U(N) MSYM.
    Established via Matrix theory (Seiberg, Sen, Banks et al.), reviewed in Section 1.1; used as the open-string side of the duality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Underlying Nonrelativistic Nature of Relativistic Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HK3OLZFA

@misc{pith2026250203031,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Underlying Nonrelativistic Nature of Relativistic Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HK3OLZFA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03031}
}
read the original abstract

Over the past quarter century, considerable effort has been invested in the study of nonrelativistic (NR) string theory, its U-dual NR brane theories, and their geometric foundations in (generalized) Newton-Cartan geometry. Many interesting results have been obtained, both for their intrinsic value and in the hope that they hold useful lessons for relativistic string/M theory. By synthesizing two strands of recent developments (especially, arXiv:2312.13243 and arXiv:2410.03591), we argue that this hope has already come to fruition, because standard, relativistic holography can now be recognized as a statement within a corresponding nonrelativistic brane theory. Our main conclusions are general, but in the familiar example of D3-brane based holography, they read as follows: (i) N=4 SYM is exactly the worldvolume theory of D3-branes within `NR D3-brane theory'; (ii) AdS_5*S^5 is exactly the corresponding RR black 3-brane, and includes an asymptotically flat-Newton-Cartan region; (iii) AdS/CFT duality is precisely synonymous with black-brane/D-brane (i.e., closed-string/open-string) duality within NR D3-brane theory; (iv) Newton-Cartan geometry is the underlying structure upon which entanglement of the D3-brane degrees of freedom builds relativistic spacetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03031 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A portion of the duality web for Type II NR/DLCQ theories on a transverse Tp−1 for p = 1, 3, 5, including the images of N fundamental strings and K longitudinal Dp-branes, in the various descriptions. N must be strictly positive, but K is arbitrary. Non-vanishing-size compactifications are not mentioned. As explained in footnote 7, this figure can be alternatively presented with the second column omitted, implying a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Truncation of the closed string spectrum induced by the nonrelativistic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Longitudinal D-brane in NR string theory. Left: The D-brane must carry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Stack of N coincident positively-wound fundamental strings. Top left: The stack embedded in the 10-dimensional flat string Newton-Cartan (SNC) background. Top right: When Ng2 s ≫ 1, an alternative description emerges in terms of the black string geometry (22), which ca…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stack of K coincident longitudinal Dp-branes carrying a density ν > 0 of longitudinal fundamental string charge. Top left: The stack embedded in the 10- dimensional flat string Newton-Cartan (SNC) background. Top right: When νg2 s ≫ 1, an alternative description emerge…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representations of anti-de Sitter (AdS) space. Top: Standard schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic depiction of the setup in nonrelativistic D3-brane (NRD3) theory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pulling the D-branes apart. Left: Two stacks of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Minimal surfaces (in red) involved in the entanglement entropy calculation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Galilei to Euclidean Carroll and the Alice Particle: The Times They Are a-Changin'

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Making time transversal turns p-brane Galilei limits into Euclidean p-brane Carroll limits, yielding for p=0 a centrally extended Alice algebra and Alice particle obtained from critical tachyon limits or two-time null...

  2. Curvatures and Non-metricities in the Non-Relativistic Limit of Bosonic Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A metric-only, torsionless-connection formulation with fixed non-metricities rewrites the non-relativistic limit of bosonic supergravity covariantly and matches the vielbein string Newton-Cartan action at Lagrangian level.

  3. An Introduction to String Newton-Cartan Holography and Integrability

    hep-th 2026-03 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    String Newton-Cartan holography, the non-relativistic limit of the AdS/CFT correspondence, is organized and reviewed around five consistency conditions, with its classical solutions, spectrum, and integrability structure.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

224 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [15]

    Matrix Theory Reloaded: A BPS Road to Holography,

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. Obers, and Z. Yan, “Matrix Theory Reloaded: A BPS Road to Holography,” 2410.03591

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    IIA/B, wound and wrapped,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. G¨ uijosa, and M. Kruczenski, “IIA/B, wound and wrapped,” JHEP 10 (2000) 020, hep-th/0009182

    arXiv 2000

  3. [2]

    Nonrelativistic closed string theory,

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri, “Nonrelativistic closed string theory,” J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 3127–3151, hep-th/0009181

    arXiv 2001

  4. [3]

    Newtonian gravitons and D-brane collective coordinates in wound string theory,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. G¨ uijosa, and M. Kruczenski, “Newtonian gravitons and D-brane collective coordinates in wound string theory,” JHEP 03 (2001) 041, hep-th/0012183

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112–5128, hep-th/9610043

    arXiv 1997

  6. [5]

    Another conjecture about M(atrix) theory,

    L. Susskind, “Another conjecture about M(atrix) theory,” hep-th/9704080

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105–114, hep-th/9802109

    arXiv 1998

Show all 224 references
  1. [8]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Aspects of Nonrelativistic Strings,

    G. Oling and Z. Yan, “Aspects of Nonrelativistic Strings,” Front. in Phys. 10 (2022) 832271, 2202.12698

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Geometry from D-branes in nonrelativistic string theory,

    A. G¨ uijosa and I. C. Rosas-L´ opez, “Geometry from D-branes in nonrelativistic string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 (2024), no. 17n18, 2450031, 2312.03332

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Asymptotically nonrelativistic string backgrounds,

    D. ´Avila, A. G¨ uijosa, and R. Olmedo, “Asymptotically nonrelativistic string backgrounds,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 (2024), no. 15n16, 2450047, 2312.13243

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Non-relativistic duality and T ¯T deformations,

    C. D. A. Blair, “Non-relativistic duality and T ¯T deformations,” JHEP 07 (2020) 069, 2002.12413

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory,

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. Obers, and Z. Yan, “Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 16, 161603, 2311.10564. 45

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Worldsheet Formalism for Decoupling Limits in String Theory,

    J. Gomis and Z. Yan, “Worldsheet Formalism for Decoupling Limits in String Theory,” 2311.10565

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Strings in background electric field, space / time noncommutativity and a new noncritical string theory,

    N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, “Strings in background electric field, space / time noncommutativity and a new noncritical string theory,” JHEP 06 (2000) 021, hep-th/0005040

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    S duality and noncommutative gauge theory,

    R. Gopakumar, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and A. Strominger, “S duality and noncommutative gauge theory,” JHEP 06 (2000) 036, hep-th/0005048

    2000 arXiv

  10. [18]

    (1+1)-dimensional NCOS and its U(N) gauge theory dual,

    I. R. Klebanov and J. M. Maldacena, “(1+1)-dimensional NCOS and its U(N) gauge theory dual,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16 (2001) 922–935, hep-th/0006085. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4,283(2000)]

    2001 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee. (premi` ere partie),

    E. Cartan, “Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee. (premi` ere partie),”Annales Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 40 (1923) 325–412

    1923

  12. [20]

    Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee. (premi` ere partie) (Suite).,

    E. Cartan, “Sur les vari´ et´ es ` a connexion affine et la th´ eorie de la relativit´ e g´ en´ eralis´ ee. (premi` ere partie) (Suite).,”Annales Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 41 (1924) 1–25

    1924

  13. [21]

    Review on Non-Relativistic Gravity,

    J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Review on Non-Relativistic Gravity,” 2212.11309

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    A non-lorentzian primer,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, and J. Gomis, “A non-lorentzian primer,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 69 (2023) 1, 2206.12177

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    ’Stringy’ Newton-Cartan Gravity,

    R. Andringa, E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, and M. de Roo, “’Stringy’ Newton-Cartan Gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 235020, 1206.5176

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Nonrelativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, and N. A. Obers, “Nonrelativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 8, 086019, 1705.03535

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, and Z. Yan, “Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,” JHEP 11 (2018) 133, 1806.06071

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers, and Z. Yan, “Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Symmetry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” JHEP 11 (2018) 190, 1810.05560

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields,

    J. Gomis, J. Oh, and Z. Yan, “Nonrelativistic String Theory in Background Fields,” JHEP 10 (2019) 101, 1905.07315. 46

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings,

    A. D. Gallegos, U. G¨ ursoy, and N. Zinnato, “Torsional Newton Cartan gravity from non-relativistic strings,” JHEP 09 (2020) 172, 1906.01607

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Relating non-relativistic string theories,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Relating non-relativistic string theories,” JHEP 11 (2019) 071, 1907.01663

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel, and C. S ¸im¸ sek, “A non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity,” JHEP 06 (2021) 021, 2102.06974

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings,

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings,” JHEP 02 (2022) 116, 2107.00642

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nonrenormalization of the Superstring Tension,

    A. Dabholkar and J. A. Harvey, “Nonrenormalization of the Superstring Tension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 478

    1989

  25. [33]

    Superstrings and Solitons,

    A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey, and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Superstrings and Solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B340 (1990) 33–55

    1990

  26. [34]

    Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Nonrelativistic String Theory,

    Z. Yan and M. Yu, “Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Nonrelativistic String Theory,” JHEP 03 (2020) 181, 1912.03181

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory,

    J. Gomis, Z. Yan, and M. Yu, “Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP 03 (2021) 269, 2007.01886

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Torsional deformation of nonrelativistic string theory,

    Z. Yan, “Torsional deformation of nonrelativistic string theory,” JHEP 09 (2021) 035, 2106.10021

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    On space of integrable quantum field theories,

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On space of integrable quantum field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363–383, 1608.05499

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    T ¯T -deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, and R. Tateo, “T ¯T -deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,” JHEP 10 (2016) 112, 1608.05534

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,

    Y. Jiang, “A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021), no. 5, 057201, 1904.13376

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Why is the matrix model correct?,

    N. Seiberg, “Why is the matrix model correct?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3577–3580, hep-th/9710009

    1997 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D0-branes on T n and matrix theory,

    A. Sen, “D0-branes on T n and matrix theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 51–59, hep-th/9709220

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Compactification in the lightlike limit,

    S. Hellerman and J. Polchinski, “Compactification in the lightlike limit,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 125002, hep-th/9711037. 47

    1999 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Is physics in the infinite momentum frame independent of the compactification radius?,

    A. G¨ uijosa, “Is physics in the infinite momentum frame independent of the compactification radius?,” Nucl. Phys. B 533 (1998) 406–426, hep-th/9804034

    1998 arXiv

  36. [44]

    DLCQ of M theory as the lightlike limit,

    A. Bilal, “DLCQ of M theory as the lightlike limit,” Phys. Lett. B 435 (1998) 312–318, hep-th/9805070

    1998 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Matrix string theory,

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Matrix string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 43–61, hep-th/9703030

    1997 arXiv

  38. [46]

    U-duality between NCOS theory and matrix theory,

    S. Hyun, “U-duality between NCOS theory and matrix theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 598 (2001) 276–290, hep-th/0008213

    2001 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bound states of strings and p-branes,

    E. Witten, “Bound states of strings and p-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 335–350, hep-th/9510135

    1996 arXiv

  40. [48]

    (OM) theory in diverse dimensions,

    R. Gopakumar, S. Minwalla, N. Seiberg, and A. Strominger, “(OM) theory in diverse dimensions,” JHEP 08 (2000) 008, hep-th/0006062

    2000 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A Membrane action for OM theory,

    J. Garc ´ ıa, A. G¨ uijosa, and J. Vergara, “A Membrane action for OM theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 630 (2002) 178–202, hep-th/0201140

    2002 arXiv

  42. [50]

    New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T 5 and T5/Z2,

    N. Seiberg, “New theories in six-dimensions and matrix description of M theory on T 5 and T5/Z2,” Phys. Lett. B 408 (1997) 98–104, hep-th/9705221

    1997 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M & m’s,

    A. Losev, G. W. Moore, and S. L. Shatashvili, “M & m’s,” Nucl. Phys. B 522 (1998) 105–124, hep-th/9707250

    1998 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Little String Theories on Curved Manifolds,

    O. Aharony, M. Evtikhiev, and A. Feldman, “Little String Theories on Curved Manifolds,” JHEP 10 (2019) 180, 1908.02642

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    More on mixed boundary conditions and D-branes bound states,

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “More on mixed boundary conditions and D-branes bound states,” Phys. Lett. B 425 (1998) 48–54, hep-th/9712199

    1998 arXiv

  46. [54]

    SuperYang-Mills theory on noncommutative torus from open strings interactions,

    M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “SuperYang-Mills theory on noncommutative torus from open strings interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 450 (1999) 119–125, hep-th/9810179

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    String theory and noncommutative geometry,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” JHEP 09 (1999) 032, hep-th/9908142

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Branched SL(2,Z) duality,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, K. T. Grosvenor, J. Lahnsteiner, Z. Yan, and U. Zorba, “Branched SL(2,Z) duality,” JHEP 10 (2022) 131, 2208.13815

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Constructing Non-Relativistic AdS5/CFT4 Holography,

    A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto Garc ´ ıa, “Constructing Non-Relativistic AdS5/CFT4 Holography,” 2403.02379

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Non-relativistic M2-branes and the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    N. Lambert and J. Smith, “Non-relativistic M2-branes and the AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2024) 009, 2401.14955. 48

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Non-relativistic intersecting branes, Newton-Cartan geometry and AdS/CFT,

    N. Lambert and J. Smith, “Non-relativistic intersecting branes, Newton-Cartan geometry and AdS/CFT,” JHEP 07 (2024) 224, 2405.06552

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Nonrelativistic Holography from AdS5/CFT4,

    A. Fontanella and J. M. Nieto Garc ´ ıa, “Nonrelativistic Holography from AdS5/CFT4,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 15, 151601, 2409.02267

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Reciprocal non-relativistic decoupling limits of String Theory and M-Theory,

    N. Lambert and J. Smith, “Reciprocal non-relativistic decoupling limits of String Theory and M-Theory,” JHEP 12 (2024) 094, 2410.17074

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dynamics of Carroll Strings,

    B. Cardona, J. Gomis, and J. M. Pons, “Dynamics of Carroll Strings,” JHEP 07 (2016) 050, 1605.05483

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, K. S. Kolekar, and M. Mandlik, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 8, 086009, 2312.14240

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Carroll strings with an extended symmetry algebra,

    M. Harksen, D. Hidalgo, W. Sybesma, and L. Thorlacius, “Carroll strings with an extended symmetry algebra,” JHEP 05 (2024) 206, 2403.01984

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, and K. S. Kolekar, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,” JHEP 11 (2024) 024, 2407.12911

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Spin Matrix Theory: A quantum mechanical model of the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    T. Harmark and M. Orselli, “Spin Matrix Theory: A quantum mechanical model of the AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 11 (2014) 134, 1409.4417

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    The Zero tension limit of the superstring,

    U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg, and G. Theodoridis, “The Zero tension limit of the superstring,” Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 319–323

    1991

  60. [68]

    The Zero tension limit of the spinning string,

    U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg, and G. Theodoridis, “The Zero tension limit of the spinning string,” Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 331–334

    1991

  61. [69]

    Space-time symmetries of quantized tensionless strings,

    J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, and B. Sundborg, “Space-time symmetries of quantized tensionless strings,” Phys. Lett. B 293 (1992) 321–326, hep-th/9207005

    1992 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,

    A. Bagchi, “Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,” JHEP 05 (2013) 141, 1303.0291

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,” JHEP 01 (2016) 158, 1507.04361

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,” JHEP 10 (2016) 113, 1606.09628

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Non-relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS5 × S5,

    J. Gomis, J. Gomis, and K. Kamimura, “Non-relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS5 × S5,” JHEP 12 (2005) 024, hep-th/0507036

    2005 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Holography of Non-relativistic String on AdS(5) x S**5,

    M. Sakaguchi and K. Yoshida, “Holography of Non-relativistic String on AdS(5) x S**5,” JHEP 02 (2008) 092, 0712.4112. 49

    2008 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Spin Matrix Theory String Backgrounds and Penrose Limits of AdS/CFT,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Spin Matrix Theory String Backgrounds and Penrose Limits of AdS/CFT,” JHEP 03 (2021) 129, 2011.02539

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 046004, hep-th/9802042

    1998 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Gauge theory, geometry and the large N limit,

    V. Balasubramanian, R. Gopakumar, and F. Larsen, “Gauge theory, geometry and the large N limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 415–431, hep-th/9712077

    1998 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Infinite Lorentz boost along the M theory circle and nonasymptotically flat solutions in supergravities,

    S. Hyun, Y. Kiem, and H. Shin, “Infinite Lorentz boost along the M theory circle and nonasymptotically flat solutions in supergravities,” Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4856–4861, hep-th/9712021

    1998 arXiv

  71. [79]

    The Background geometry of DLCQ supergravity,

    S. Hyun, “The Background geometry of DLCQ supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998) 116–122, hep-th/9802026

    1998 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Background geometry of DLCQ M theory on a p - torus and holography,

    S. Hyun and Y. Kiem, “Background geometry of DLCQ M theory on a p - torus and holography,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 026003, hep-th/9805136

    1999 arXiv

  73. [81]

    On the supergravity gauge theory correspondence and the matrix model,

    S. P. de Alwis, “On the supergravity gauge theory correspondence and the matrix model,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 044029, hep-th/9806178

    1999 arXiv

  74. [82]

    M theory and the light cone,

    J. Polchinski, “M theory and the light cone,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 134 (1999) 158–170, hep-th/9903165

    1999 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Note about Hamiltonian formalism for Newton–Cartan string and p-brane,

    J. Kluson, “Note about Hamiltonian formalism for Newton–Cartan string and p-brane,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018), no. 6, 511, 1712.07430

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    p-brane Newton–Cartan geometry,

    D. Pere˜ niguez, “p-brane Newton–Cartan geometry,” J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019), no. 11, 112501, 1908.04801

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    A non-relativistic limit of M-theory and 11-dimensional membrane Newton-Cartan geometry,

    C. D. A. Blair, D. Gallegos, and N. Zinnato, “A non-relativistic limit of M-theory and 11-dimensional membrane Newton-Cartan geometry,” JHEP 10 (2021) 015, 2104.07579

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Dual D-brane actions in nonrelativistic string theory,

    S. Ebert, H.-Y. Sun, and Z. Yan, “Dual D-brane actions in nonrelativistic string theory,” JHEP 04 (2022) 161, 2112.09316

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Lagrangians for nonrelativistic gravity,

    P. Novosad, “Lagrangians for nonrelativistic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 6, 064051, 2112.12648

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    p-brane Galilean and Carrollian geometries and gravities,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, K. van Helden, J. Rosseel, I. Rotko, and T. ter Veldhuis, “p-brane Galilean and Carrollian geometries and gravities,” J. Phys. A 57 (2024), no. 24, 245205, 2308.12852. 50

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Anisotropic compactification of nonrelativistic M-theory,

    S. Ebert and Z. Yan, “Anisotropic compactification of nonrelativistic M-theory,” JHEP 11 (2023) 135, 2309.04912

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    From Relativistic Gravity to the Poisson Equation,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, G. Giorgi, and L. Romano, “From Relativistic Gravity to the Poisson Equation,” 2410.00692

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Linear dilatons, NS five-branes and holography,

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, “Linear dilatons, NS five-branes and holography,” JHEP 10 (1998) 004, hep-th/9808149

    1998 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,” Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998) 199–218, hep-th/9807080

    1998 arXiv

  85. [93]

    D-brane dynamics,

    C. Bachas, “D-brane dynamics,” Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 37–42, hep-th/9511043

    1996 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Comparing d-branes to black-branes,

    G. Lifschytz, “Comparing d-branes to black-branes,” Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 720–726, hep-th/9604156

    1996 arXiv

  87. [95]

    D-branes and short distances in string theory,

    M. R. Douglas, D. N. Kabat, P. Pouliot, and S. H. Shenker, “D-branes and short distances in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 85–127, hep-th/9608024

    1997 arXiv

  88. [96]

    A Two loop test of M(atrix) theory,

    K. Becker and M. Becker, “A Two loop test of M(atrix) theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 506 (1997) 48–60, hep-th/9705091

    1997 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Higher order graviton scattering in M(atrix) theory,

    K. Becker, M. Becker, J. Polchinski, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Higher order graviton scattering in M(atrix) theory,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) R3174–R3178, hep-th/9706072

    1997 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Multigraviton scattering in the matrix model,

    M. Dine and A. Rajaraman, “Multigraviton scattering in the matrix model,” Phys. Lett. B 425 (1998) 77–85, hep-th/9710174

    1998 arXiv

  91. [99]

    On graviton scattering amplitudes in M theory,

    K. Becker and M. Becker, “On graviton scattering amplitudes in M theory,” Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6464–6470, hep-th/9712238

    1998 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Two loop N=4 superYang-Mills effective action and interaction between D3-branes,

    I. L. Buchbinder, A. Y. Petrov, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Two loop N=4 superYang-Mills effective action and interaction between D3-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 621 (2002) 179–207, hep-th/0110173

    2002 arXiv

  93. [101]

    M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,

    W. Taylor, “M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 419–462, hep-th/0101126

    2001 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, hep-th/0603001

    2006 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 08 (2006) 045, hep-th/0605073. 51

    2006 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Non-relativistic superbranes,

    J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, and P. K. Townsend, “Non-relativistic superbranes,” JHEP 11 (2004) 051, hep-th/0409219

    2004 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Extended Galilean symmetries of non-relativistic strings,

    C. Batlle, J. Gomis, and D. Not, “Extended Galilean symmetries of non-relativistic strings,” JHEP 02 (2017) 049, 1611.00026

    2017 arXiv

  98. [106]

    The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,” JHEP 04 (1999) 017, hep-th/9903224

    1999 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Black branes in wound string theory

    A. G¨ uijosa, “Black branes in wound string theory.” unpublished, 2001

    2001

  100. [108]

    String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, J. Rosseel, C. S ¸im¸ sek, and Z. Yan, “String Theory and String Newton-Cartan Geometry,” J. Phys. A53 (2020), no. 1, 014001, 1907.10668

    2020 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Non-relativistic ten-dimensional minimal supergravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel, and C. Simsek, “Non-relativistic ten-dimensional minimal supergravity,” JHEP 12 (2021) 123, 2107.14636

    2021 arXiv

  102. [110]

    An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB superstrings,

    J. H. Schwarz, “An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB superstrings,” Phys. Lett. B 360 (1995) 13–18, hep-th/9508143. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 364, 252 (1995)]

    1995 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Waves, boosted branes and BPS states in m theory,

    J. G. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “Waves, boosted branes and BPS states in m theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 121–144, hep-th/9611047

    1997 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Superstring dualities and p-brane bound states,

    M. S. Costa and G. Papadopoulos, “Superstring dualities and p-brane bound states,” Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998) 217–231, hep-th/9612204

    1998 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Nonthreshold (f, Dp) bound states,

    J. X. Lu and S. Roy, “Nonthreshold (f, Dp) bound states,” Nucl. Phys. B 560 (1999) 181–206, hep-th/9904129

    1999 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Supergravity and space-time noncommutative open string theory,

    T. Harmark, “Supergravity and space-time noncommutative open string theory,” JHEP 07 (2000) 043, hep-th/0006023

    2000 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Black strings and P-branes,

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, “Black strings and P-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 197–209

    1991

  108. [116]

    Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724–4727, hep-th/9510017

    1995 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Branes within branes,

    M. R. Douglas, “Branes within branes,” NATO Sci. Ser. C 520 (1999) 267–275, hep-th/9512077

    1999 arXiv

  110. [118]

    New Connections Between String Theories,

    J. Dai, R. G. Leigh, and J. Polchinski, “New Connections Between String Theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2073–2083

    1989

  111. [119]

    Background Duality of Open String Models,

    P. Horava, “Background Duality of Open String Models,” Phys. Lett. B 231 (1989) 251–257. 52

    1989

  112. [120]

    Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99–104, hep-th/9601029

    1996 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Gravitational lensing by p-branes,

    S. S. Gubser, A. Hashimoto, I. R. Klebanov, and J. M. Maldacena, “Gravitational lensing by p-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 231–248, hep-th/9601057

    1996 arXiv

  114. [122]

    D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics,

    C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena, “D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 591–610, hep-th/9602043

    1996 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Entropy and temperature of black 3-branes,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. W. Peet, “Entropy and temperature of black 3-branes,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 3915–3919, hep-th/9602135

    1996 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Black hole grey body factors and d-brane spectroscopy,

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “Black hole grey body factors and d-brane spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 861–870, hep-th/9609026

    1997 arXiv

  117. [125]

    World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,

    I. R. Klebanov, “World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 496 (1997) 231–242, hep-th/9702076

    1997 arXiv

  118. [126]

    String theory and classical absorption by three-branes,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. A. Tseytlin, “String theory and classical absorption by three-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 217–240, hep-th/9703040

    1997 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Absorption by branes and Schwinger terms in the world volume theory,

    S. S. Gubser and I. R. Klebanov, “Absorption by branes and Schwinger terms in the world volume theory,” Phys. Lett. B 413 (1997) 41–48, hep-th/9708005

    1997 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Summing planar diagrams,

    M. Kruczenski, “Summing planar diagrams,” JHEP 10 (2008) 075, hep-th/0703218

    2008 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Field theory limit of branes and gauged supergravities,

    K. Skenderis, “Field theory limit of branes and gauged supergravities,” Fortsch. Phys. 48 (2000) 205–208, hep-th/9903003

    2000 arXiv

  122. [130]

    On domain wall / QFT dualities in various dimensions,

    K. Behrndt, E. Bergshoeff, R. Halbersma, and J. P. van der Schaar, “On domain wall / QFT dualities in various dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3517–3552, hep-th/9907006

    1999 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Brane death and dynamics from the Born-Infeld action,

    C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena, “Brane death and dynamics from the Born-Infeld action,” Nucl. Phys. B 513 (1998) 198–212, hep-th/9708147

    1998 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes,

    G. W. Gibbons, “Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 514 (1998) 603–639, hep-th/9709027

    1998 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Dielectric branes,

    R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,” JHEP 12 (1999) 022, hep-th/9910053

    1999 arXiv

  126. [134]

    General covariance of the nonAbelian DBI action,

    J. De Boer and K. Schalm, “General covariance of the nonAbelian DBI action,” JHEP 02 (2003) 041, hep-th/0108161. 53

    2003 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Generally covariant actions for multiple D-branes,

    D. Brecher, K. Furuuchi, H. Ling, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Generally covariant actions for multiple D-branes,” JHEP 06 (2004) 020, hep-th/0403289

    2004 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Poincare invariance in multiple D-brane actions,

    D. Brecher, P. Koerber, H. Ling, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Poincare invariance in multiple D-brane actions,” JHEP 01 (2006) 151, hep-th/0509026

    2006 arXiv

  129. [137]

    On Matrix Geometry and Effective Actions,

    F. Ferrari, “On Matrix Geometry and Effective Actions,” Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 181–221, 1301.3722

    2013 arXiv

  130. [138]

    On the covariance of the Dirac-Born-Infeld-Myers action,

    P. S. Howe, U. Lindstrom, and L. Wulff, “On the covariance of the Dirac-Born-Infeld-Myers action,” JHEP 02 (2007) 070, hep-th/0607156

    2007 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Dirac-Born-Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,

    R. G. Leigh, “Dirac-Born-Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 2767

    1989

  132. [140]

    Wilson loops in large N field theories,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862, hep-th/9803002

    1998 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,

    S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379–394, hep-th/9803001

    2001 arXiv

  134. [142]

    What does the string / gauge correspondence teach us about Wilson loops?,

    J. Sonnenschein, “What does the string / gauge correspondence teach us about Wilson loops?,” in Advanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes , pp. 219–269. 7, 1999. hep-th/0003032

    1999 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Wilson loops in SYM theory: From weak to strong coupling,

    G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo, “Wilson loops in SYM theory: From weak to strong coupling,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 108 (2002) 106–112, hep-th/0202156

    2002 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Holographic Lessons for Quark Dynamics,

    M. Chernicoff, J. A. Garc ´ ıa, A. G¨ uijosa, and J. F. Pedraza, “Holographic Lessons for Quark Dynamics,” J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 054002, 1111.0872

    2012 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Localization and AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    K. Zarembo, “Localization and AdS/CFT Correspondence,” J. Phys. A 50 (2017), no. 44, 443011, 1608.02963

    2017 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Quark - monopole potentials in large N superYang-Mills,

    J. A. Minahan, “Quark - monopole potentials in large N superYang-Mills,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 559–569, hep-th/9803111

    1998 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Anti-de Sitter fragmentation,

    J. M. Maldacena, J. Michelson, and A. Strominger, “Anti-de Sitter fragmentation,” JHEP 02 (1999) 011, hep-th/9812073

    1999 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Comments on string theory on AdS(3),

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on string theory on AdS(3),” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 733–782, hep-th/9806194. 54

    1998 arXiv

  141. [149]

    String theory on AdS3,

    J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins, and J. Tannenhauser, “String theory on AdS3,” JHEP 12 (1998) 026, hep-th/9812046

    1998 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Strings in AdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model 1: The Spectrum,

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, “Strings in AdS 3 and SL(2,R) WZW model 1: The Spectrum,” J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 2929–2960, hep-th/0001053

    2001 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Deriving the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP 02 (2020) 136, 1911.00378

    2020 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Exact absorption probabilities for the D3-brane,

    S. S. Gubser and A. Hashimoto, “Exact absorption probabilities for the D3-brane,” Commun. Math. Phys. 203 (1999) 325–340, hep-th/9805140

    1999 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Maximally supersymmetric RG flows and AdS duality,

    K. A. Intriligator, “Maximally supersymmetric RG flows and AdS duality,” Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 99–120, hep-th/9909082

    2000 arXiv

  146. [154]

    D3-brane holography,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. G¨ uijosa, M. Kruczenski, and B. Sundborg, “D3-brane holography,” JHEP 05 (2000) 028, hep-th/0004187

    2000 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Conifold holography,

    X. Amador, E. C´ aceres, H. Garc ´ ıa-Compe´ an, and A. G¨ uijosa, “Conifold holography,” JHEP 06 (2003) 049, hep-th/0305257

    2003 arXiv

  148. [156]

    D-brane bound states redux,

    S. Sethi and M. Stern, “D-brane bound states redux,” Commun. Math. Phys. 194 (1998) 675–705, hep-th/9705046

    1998 arXiv

  149. [157]

    On the Ground State Wave Function of Matrix Theory,

    Y.-H. Lin and X. Yin, “On the Ground State Wave Function of Matrix Theory,” JHEP 11 (2015) 027, 1402.0055

    2015 arXiv

  150. [158]

    The Spectrum of the S 5 Compactification of the Chiral N = 2, D = 10 Supergravity and the Unitary Supermultiplets of U(2, 2/4),

    M. Gunaydin and N. Marcus, “The Spectrum of the S 5 Compactification of the Chiral N = 2, D = 10 Supergravity and the Unitary Supermultiplets of U(2, 2/4),” Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985) L11

    1985

  151. [159]

    The Mass Spectrum of Chiral N = 2 D = 10 Supergravity on S 5,

    H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “The Mass Spectrum of Chiral N = 2 D = 10 Supergravity on S 5,” Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 389

    1985

  152. [160]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,

    E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,” JHEP 12 (1998) 012, hep-th/9812012

    1998 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183–386, hep-th/9905111

    2000 arXiv

  154. [162]

    A Note on the chiral anomaly in the AdS / CFT correspondence and 1 / N**2 correction,

    A. Bilal and C.-S. Chu, “A Note on the chiral anomaly in the AdS / CFT correspondence and 1 / N**2 correction,” Nucl. Phys. B 562 (1999) 181–190, hep-th/9907106

    1999 arXiv

  155. [163]

    The Boundary Weyl anomaly in the N=4 SYM / type IIB supergravity correspondence,

    P. Mansfield, D. Nolland, and T. Ueno, “The Boundary Weyl anomaly in the N=4 SYM / type IIB supergravity correspondence,” JHEP 01 (2004) 013, hep-th/0311021. 55

    2004 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N=4 superYang Mills from AdS dynamics,

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati, and A. Zaffaroni, “Novel local CFT and exact results on perturbations of N=4 superYang Mills from AdS dynamics,” JHEP 12 (1998) 022, hep-th/9810126

    1998 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem,

    D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch, and N. P. Warner, “Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 363–417, hep-th/9904017

    1999 arXiv

  158. [166]

    The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory,

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati, and A. Zaffaroni, “The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 569 (2000) 451–469, hep-th/9909047

    2000 arXiv

  159. [167]

    The String dual of a confining four-dimensional gauge theory,

    J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler, “The String dual of a confining four-dimensional gauge theory,” hep-th/0003136

    arXiv

  160. [168]

    The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen, and S. P. Trivedi, “The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,” JHEP 03 (1999) 003, hep-th/9811120

    1999 arXiv

  161. [169]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556 (1999) 89–114, hep-th/9905104

    1999 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Holographic Coulomb branch vevs,

    K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Holographic Coulomb branch vevs,” JHEP 08 (2006) 001, hep-th/0604169

    2006 arXiv

  163. [171]

    Three-brane action and the correspondence between N=4 Yang-Mills theory and anti-De Sitter space,

    S. R. Das and S. P. Trivedi, “Three-brane action and the correspondence between N=4 Yang-Mills theory and anti-De Sitter space,” Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 142–149, hep-th/9804149

    1998 arXiv

  164. [172]

    A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,” JHEP 07 (2007) 062, 0705.0016

    2007 arXiv

  165. [173]

    Generalized gravitational entropy,

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” JHEP 08 (2013) 090, 1304.4926

    2013 arXiv

  166. [174]

    Deriving covariant holographic entanglement,

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz, and M. Rangamani, “Deriving covariant holographic entanglement,” JHEP 11 (2016) 028, 1607.07506

    2016 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931. Springer, 2017

    2017

  168. [176]

    Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group,

    T. Nishioka, “Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018), no. 3, 035007, 1801.10352

    2018 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Entanglement between Two Interacting CFTs and Generalized Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement between Two Interacting CFTs and Generalized Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 04 (2014) 185, 1403.1393. 56

    2014 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Holographic entanglement entropy and the internal space,

    A. Karch and C. F. Uhlemann, “Holographic entanglement entropy and the internal space,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 8, 086005, 1501.00003

    2015 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Generalized entanglement entropy,

    M. Taylor, “Generalized entanglement entropy,” JHEP 07 (2016) 040, 1507.06410

    2016 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Renormalized entanglement entropy,

    M. Taylor and W. Woodhead, “Renormalized entanglement entropy,” JHEP 08 (2016) 165, 1604.06808

    2016 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Topological terms, AdS 2n gravity and renormalized Entanglement Entropy of holographic CFTs,

    G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, and R. Olea, “Topological terms, AdS 2n gravity and renormalized Entanglement Entropy of holographic CFTs,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 10, 106015, 1803.04990

    2018 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Renormalized AdS gravity and holographic entanglement entropy of even-dimensional CFTs,

    G. Anastasiou, I. J. Araya, A. G¨ uijosa, and R. Olea, “Renormalized AdS gravity and holographic entanglement entropy of even-dimensional CFTs,” JHEP 10 (2019) 221, 1908.11447

    2019 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,

    B. Swingle, “Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007, 0905.1317

    2012 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323–2329, 1005.3035

    2010 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Cool horizons for entangled black holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781–811, 1306.0533

    2013 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2015) 149, 1503.06237

    2015 arXiv

  179. [187]

    Holographic duality from random tensor networks,

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter, and Z. Yang, “Holographic duality from random tensor networks,” JHEP 11 (2016) 009, 1601.01694

    2016 arXiv

  180. [188]

    Beyond Toy Models: Distilling Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT,

    N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce, and A. C. Wall, “Beyond Toy Models: Distilling Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT,” JHEP 11 (2019) 069, 1812.01171

    2019 arXiv

  181. [189]

    Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit,” 1809.01197

    arXiv

  182. [190]

    The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,

    B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009, 1204.1330

    2012 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    A. C. Wall, “Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014), no. 22, 225007, 1211.3494. 57

    2014 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP 01 (2015) 073, 1408.3203

    2015 arXiv

  185. [193]

    Causality & holographic entanglement entropy,

    M. Headrick, V. E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence, and M. Rangamani, “Causality & holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP 12 (2014) 162, 1408.6300

    2014 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04 (2015) 163, 1411.7041

    2015 arXiv

  187. [195]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction using the Petz Map,

    C.-F. Chen, G. Penington, and G. Salton, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction using the Petz Map,” JHEP 01 (2020) 168, 1902.02844

    2020 arXiv

  188. [196]

    Holographic coarse-graining: correlators from the entanglement wedge and other reduced geometries,

    A. G¨ uijosa, Y. D. Olivas, and J. F. Pedraza, “Holographic coarse-graining: correlators from the entanglement wedge and other reduced geometries,” JHEP 08 (2022) 118, 2201.01786

    2022 arXiv

  189. [197]

    The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction,

    D. Harlow, “The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction,” Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017), no. 3, 865–912, 1607.03901

    2017 arXiv

  190. [198]

    Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction,

    C. Akers and G. Penington, “Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction,” SciPost Phys. 12 (2022), no. 5, 157, 2109.14618

    2022 arXiv

  191. [199]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09 (2020) 002, 1905.08255

    2020 arXiv

  192. [200]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP 12 (2019) 063, 1905.08762

    2019 arXiv

  193. [201]

    The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, “The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,” JHEP 03 (2020) 149, 1908.10996

    2020 arXiv

  194. [202]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,” JHEP 03 (2022) 205, 1911.11977

    2022 arXiv

  195. [203]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP 05 (2020) 013, 1911.12333

    2020 arXiv

  196. [204]

    Massive islands,

    H. Geng and A. Karch, “Massive islands,” JHEP 09 (2020) 121, 2006.02438

    2020 arXiv

  197. [205]

    Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,” JHEP 02 (2021) 009, 2007.16091

    2021 arXiv

  198. [206]

    Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,” SciPost Phys. 10 (2021), no. 5, 103, 2012.04671. 58

    2021 arXiv

  199. [207]

    Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,” JHEP 01 (2022) 182, 2107.03390

    2022 arXiv

  200. [208]

    Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan, and M. Sasieta, “Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. X 14 (2024), no. 1, 011024, 2212.02447

    2024 arXiv

  201. [209]

    Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,

    H. Geng, “Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,” JHEP 01 (2025) 063, 2405.14872

    2025 arXiv

  202. [210]

    The Mechanism behind the Information Encoding for Islands,

    H. Geng, “The Mechanism behind the Information Encoding for Islands,” 2502.08703

    arXiv

  203. [211]

    Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 8, 086019, 2110.05497

    2023 arXiv

  204. [212]

    Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 8, 086020, 2112.12156

    2023 arXiv

  205. [213]

    Gravity and the crossed product,

    E. Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,” JHEP 10 (2022) 008, 2112.12828

    2022 arXiv

  206. [214]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,” JHEP 02 (2023) 082, 2206.10780

    2023 arXiv

  207. [215]

    Large N algebras and generalized entropy,

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “Large N algebras and generalized entropy,” JHEP 04 (2023) 009, 2209.10454

    2023 arXiv

  208. [216]

    Subregion-subalgebra duality: emergence of space and time in holography,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Subregion-subalgebra duality: emergence of space and time in holography,” 2212.13266

    arXiv

  209. [217]

    State-dressed local operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi, and N. Vardian, “State-dressed local operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 8, 086035, 2209.06845

    2023 arXiv

  210. [218]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,

    E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,” JHEP 03 (2024) 077, 2308.03663

    2024 arXiv

  211. [219]

    Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 2, 025013, 2309.15897

    2025 arXiv

  212. [220]

    Algebraic ER=EPR and complexity transfer,

    N. Engelhardt and H. Liu, “Algebraic ER=EPR and complexity transfer,” JHEP 07 (2024) 013, 2311.04281. 59

    2024 arXiv

  213. [221]

    Algebraic Observational Cosmology,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Algebraic Observational Cosmology,” 2406.01669

    arXiv

  214. [222]

    Quantum Rods and Clock in a Gravitational Universe,

    H. Geng, “Quantum Rods and Clock in a Gravitational Universe,” 2412.03636

    arXiv

  215. [223]

    On the underlying nonrelativistic nature of relativistic holography

    A. G¨ uijosa, “On the underlying nonrelativistic nature of relativistic holography.” Talk presented at the HolographyCL Farewell Meeting, January 16, 2025. https://holography.cl/activities/events/farewell

    2025

  216. [224]

    Gravitational solitons and non-relativistic string theory,

    T. Harmark, J. Lahnsteiner, and N. A. Obers, “Gravitational solitons and non-relativistic string theory,” 2501.10178. 60

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.