REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by
Altermagnetizing the FeSe-like two-dimensional materials and approaching to giant tunneling magnetoresistance with Janus Cr4BN(B2) MBene electrode
T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Nitrogen substitution plus bilayer stacking is predicted to turn a FeSe-like CrB bilayer into a stable 2D altermagnet, Cr4B3N, whose Cr-B edged vacuum-barrier junction reaches a 91,001% tunneling magnetoresistance.
desk verdict A plausible new 2D altermagnet with an unsupported headline TMR: the 91,001% value rides on an untested near-zero denominator, and the printed TMR formula contradicts the reported numbers. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the spin-group operation $[C_2 \parallel C_4^z]$ — a spin flip combined with a fourfold real-space rotation — which replaces the translation or inversion connection of a conventional antiferromagnet and makes spin-up and spin-down bands split oppositely along $X\!-\!\Gamma$ and $\Gamma\!-\!Y$ while staying degenerate along $\Gamma\!-\!M$. This symmetry is what makes the material a d-wave altermagnet. The transport claim is carried by the Cr4B3N/vacuum/Cr4B3N in-plane MTJ with matched Cr-B vertical edges, whose $k_\parallel$-resolved transmissions are computed with the non-equilibrium Green's function method; the near-total suppression of $T_{AP}$ relative to $T_P$ is the mechanism behind the 91,001% TMR.
What would settle it
The decisive check is a convergence study of the conf-3 antiparallel transmission: recomputing $T_{AP}$ with $k$-point grids from 101×101 up to 401×401, with larger basis sets and vacuum gaps from 5 to 15 Å. If $T_{AP}$ converges to a nonzero value above roughly $10^{-4}$, the TMR drops below 10,000%; if it stays below $10^{-6}$, the giant ratio is confirmed as a genuine symmetry effect.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the FeSe-like CrB monolayer, whose ground state is a conventional antiferromagnet, can be converted into an altermagnet by nitrogen substitution plus bilayer stacking: the resulting Janus MBene Cr4B3N belongs to magnetic space group $Pm'm2'$ (#25.59), has an AFM1 ground state with antiferromagnetic exchange couplings to the first four Cr neighbors, and shows a clear d-wave spin splitting of its metallic bands. The Fermi surface is spin-split in a momentum-dependent way, and the same material, used as both electrodes of a Cr4B3N/vacuum/Cr4B3N in-plane tunnel junction, gives an edge-dependent TMR: 149% for asymmetric Cr-B/Cr-B-N edges, 2,151% for matched Cr-B-N edges, and 91,001.6% for matched Cr-B edges. In the best configuration the antiparallel transmission is effectively zero in the sampled $k$-space while parallel transmission survives as strips, and the giant ratio persists across an energy window of $E_f \pm 0.5$ eV.
Load-bearing premise
The 91,001% tunneling magnetoresistance hinges on the assumption that the antiparallel-state current is truly zero to numerical resolution; any small unresolved nonzero transmission would lower the ratio by orders of magnitude.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Cr4B3N is a metallic 2D altermagnet whose AFM1 ground state is stabilized by antiferromagnetic exchange up to the fourth Cr neighbor.
- A Cr4B3N/vacuum/Cr4B3N junction with matched Cr-B edges gives a predicted TMR of 91,001.6%, while Cr-B-N edges give 2,151% and asymmetric edges give 149%.
- The near-total blocking of antiparallel transmission persists across $E_f \pm 0.5$ eV, so the junction should tolerate Fermi-level shifts from doping or gating.
- The combined N-substitution and bilayer-stacking route can in principle be applied to other FeSe-like lattices to create a family of 2D altermagnets.
- The predicted TMR exceeds previously reported altermagnetic and antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions, making the material a candidate electrode for MRAM and magnetic-sensor applications.
Reading between the lines
- Beyond the paper, the same nitrogen-substitution-plus-stacking recipe could be screened across other FeSe-like metal borides to find additional 2D altermagnets; the paper sketches this mapping but does not enumerate candidates.
- The >9 eV built-in work-function difference between the Janus surfaces, which the paper reports but does not exploit, may make Cr4B3N interesting for field emission or electrocatalysis applications beyond spintronics.
- The extreme TMR sensitivity to the antiparallel denominator suggests that real devices will need very clean Cr-B edges; atomic disorder or edge reconstruction could destroy the channel mismatch and collapse the ratio.
- Because the spin channels are momentum-split rather than net-magnetized, the junction's conductance might be switchable by rotating the Néel vector instead of applying a magnetic field, but the paper does not compute spin-transfer torques.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript uses DFT (VASP) and NEGF (QuantumATK) to predict a two-dimensional altermagnetic MBene, Cr4B3N, obtained by substituting one B atom by N in a FeSe-like CrB bilayer and then stacking bilayers. It reports phonon stability, magnetic exchange couplings via the LKAG formula, and three in-plane vacuum-barrier MTJs with different edge terminations. The central quantitative claim is a TMR ratio of 91,001.6% for the symmetric Cr-B edge junction (conf-3), which the authors attribute to near-blocked antiparallel transmission. The paper also claims a built-in work-function difference larger than 9 eV between the two sides of the Janus layer.
Significance. If the material and the transport values were fully established, the work would be significant: it proposes a design route (N substitution plus bilayer stacking) toward 2D altermagnetic MBenes and an MTJ with an ultrahigh TMR, exceeding many previously reported AFM-based junctions. The manuscript includes standard DFT+NEGF calculations, phonon spectra, and a real-space LKAG exchange analysis, and it makes falsifiable predictions about a new material and its device behavior. However, the headline TMR value is not currently supported because the printed TMR formula cannot produce the reported ratios and the near-zero antiparallel transmission is not demonstrated to be converged. These issues affect the main claim rather than presentation.
major comments (4)
- [Section 2.3, TMR definition] The manuscript defines TMR=(T_P-T_AP)/T_P in Section 2.3. With T_AP greater than or equal to zero, this ratio cannot exceed 100%. The reported values of 149%, 2151%, and 91,001% for conf-2, conf-1, and conf-3 are therefore incompatible with the printed definition. If the intended definition is the conventional ratio (T_P-T_AP)/T_AP, this must be stated explicitly and all reported values should be recomputed and interpreted accordingly. As written, the central quantitative claim is internally inconsistent.
- [Section 2.3 and Figure 4] The 91,001% TMR for conf-3 depends on an integrated antiparallel transmission T_AP that is described as 'almost blocked' (Section 2.3). No convergence or sensitivity tests are reported for this quantity: the Methods state a 101 x 101 transmission k-grid, a single-zeta-polarized basis, a fixed 7.0 A vacuum barrier, and Ueff=4.0 eV, but no variations of these parameters are given. Since T_AP appears in the denominator of the standard TMR formula, an unresolved numerical floor in T_AP can change the TMR by orders of magnitude (e.g., a floor of 10^-6 of T_P caps TMR near 10^5%, and a floor of 10^-4 caps it near 10^4%). The authors should provide convergence tests for T_AP and T_P with respect to k-grid, basis-set size, and vacuum thickness, and report the numerical noise floor.
- [Section 2.1, Abstract, Conclusion] The text repeatedly claims a built-in work-function difference of 'over 9 eV' (Abstract, Conclusion), but Section 2.1 reports work functions of 4.85 and 5.31 eV for the prototype and 2.73 and 4.86 eV for the optimized structure, giving differences of 0.46 eV and 2.13 eV. This is a quantitative contradiction in a stated material property; the claim should be corrected or the calculations should be reconciled.
- [Section 2.2] The exchange-coupling paragraph states that 'the exchanges between 1st to 4th neighbors are all in AFM coupling with negative values for the four Jij, with an exception of J1 for the upper layer.' This is self-contradictory and leaves unclear which couplings are negative. Because the robustness of the altermagnetic ground state is supported by these J values, the authors need to present the Jij values explicitly (including which J1 is meant) and correct the wording.
minor comments (5)
- [Throughout] The chemical formula is inconsistently written as Cr4B3N, Cr4BN(B2), and Cr4B3NB2; the title, abstract, and main text should use one notation consistently.
- [Section 2.3] conf-2 is described as having an 'almost zero TMR ratio of about 149%'; 149% is not almost zero, and the sentence should be reworded to describe the transmission difference rather than the TMR ratio.
- [Figure 5] The figure caption lists panels (a) and (b), but the text refers to 'Figure 5c'; the figure and text should be aligned.
- [Section 2.3] Since Cr4B3N has zero net magnetization, the meaning of 'parallel' and 'antiparallel' states of the two electrodes should be defined explicitly (e.g., relative orientation of the Neel vector or of the staggered magnetization).
- [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors (e.g., 'vaccum', 'electode', 'fucntion', 'disctribition', 'strcuture', 'P4'/n'm'm') that should be corrected in a thorough proofreading pass.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the altermagnetic state and 91,001% TMR are DFT/NEGF outputs, not restatements of fitted inputs; the TMR-formula inconsistency and missing T_AP convergence tests are correctness risks, not circularity.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The altermagnetic ground state of Cr4B3N is selected by total-energy comparison of four magnetic configurations (AFM1, AFM2, AFM3, FM) computed with DFT, and the AFM ordering is then independently characterized through LKAG exchange parameters (Eq. 2); the J_ij values are outputs of the calculation, not inputs fitted to reproduce the target magnetism. The only externally set electronic-structure parameter, U_eff = 4.0 eV on Cr 3d, is taken from prior Cr2B2 XBene literature (Ref. [62]) and is not tuned to any reported TMR value. The transport claim is obtained from DFT+NEGF transmission calculations for the Cr4B3N/vacuum/Cr4B3N junctions: T_P and T_AP are computed quantities, and the TMR ratio is derived from them rather than imposed. Minor self-citations occur (e.g., Ref. [41] for the parent CrB monolayer and related MBenes), but they are background or structural starting points, not load-bearing uniqueness arguments, and the SI independently recomputes the monolayer Cr2B2 and Cr2BN magnetic orderings. The more serious concerns are non-circular: Section 2.3 defines TMR=(T_P-T_AP)/T_P, which cannot exceed 100%, yet values of 149%, 2151%, and 91001% are reported, implying either a typographical error or the use of the alternative denominator T_AP; additionally, no k-grid, basis, or vacuum-gap convergence tests are provided for the near-zero AP transmission that dominates the denominator. These are numerical-consistency and robustness issues that should be addressed, but they do not make the central result equivalent to its inputs by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (2)
- Effective Hubbard U on Cr 3d (Ueff) =
4.0 eV
- Vacuum barrier thickness =
7.0 Å
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption PBE+U with Ueff=4.0 eV on Cr 3d is an adequate description of Cr4B3N electronic structure and magnetism.
- domain assumption The near-zero AP transmission in NEGF is a physical result rather than a numerical artifact.
- domain assumption A 7 Å vacuum gap is a valid and stable tunneling barrier in the in-plane MTJ geometry.
- domain assumption Phonon stability of the relaxed AFM1 structure implies the material is experimentally accessible.
invented entities (1)
-
Janus altermagnetic MBene Cr4B3N (also written Cr4BN(B2))
independent evidence
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Altermagnetizing the FeSe-like two-dimensional materials and approaching to giant tunneling magnetoresistance with Janus Cr4BN(B2) MBene electrode." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M5K3YWTA
@misc{pith2026250203165,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Altermagnetizing the FeSe-like two-dimensional materials and approaching to giant tunneling magnetoresistance with Janus Cr4BN(B2) MBene electrode},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M5K3YWTA}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03165}
}
read the original abstract
Altermagnetism is an emerging series of unconventional magnetic materials characterized by time-reversal symmetry breaking and spin-split bands in the momentum space with zero net magnetization. Metallic altermagnets offer unique advantages for exploring applications in spintronics as conductive metals allows for serving as electrode in magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) and/or manipulation of spincurrent through external field. Through density functional theory calculations, the 2D altermagnet Cr4B3N was predicted to be stable, resulting from a N atom substitution in the FeSe-like CrB bilayer. Both intra- and inter-layered magnetic exchanges between Cr atoms are in antiferromagnetic with the first three neighbours. Leveraging the anisotropic spin-splittings with momentum dependency revealed in band structure, we designed three edge dependent Cr4B3N/square/Cr4B3N in-plane MTJs with the 7 \AA vaccume the barrie. We found that the Cr-B vertical edge-assembled electrodes based MTJs exhibited giant tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) ratios of 91001% , by aligning the conduction channels of the electrodes in parallel and anti-parallel states in the momentum space. Our work deepens and generalizes understanding toward altermagnetic 2D metallic electrode with a newly established metal boride (MBene), and broadens applications of the nanoscale spintronics.
Figures
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantum anomalous Hall conductivity in altermagnets under applied magnetic field
External staggered mass breaks C4 valley symmetry in a pure Lieb-lattice altermagnet, producing valley-selective Chern numbers and total C=±1 QAHE while the altermagnetic order itself carries no net moment in the non-...
-
Alter-Piezoresponse in Two-Dimensional Lieb-Lattice Altermagnets
Monolayer M2WS4 altermagnets are predicted to show a giant piezomagnetic effect under axial stress and a piezoelectric effect under diagonal stress, selected by which symmetry the strain breaks.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Introduction Magnetic materials and their associated technologies have been instrumental in driving technological advancements and economic development over the past centuries, profoundly impacting various facets of human society.[1–5] Historically, magnetic compasses, for instance, played a crucial role in the age of exploration, enhancing maritime safet...
arXiv 2000
-
[23]
Y. Z. Wu, L. Deng, X. Yin, J. W. Tong, F. B. Tian, X. M. Zhang, Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 34, 10534-10539. [24] O. E. Parfenov, D. V. Averyanov, I. S. Sokolov, A. N. Mihalyuk, O. A. Kondratev, A. N. Taldenkov, A. M. Tokmachev, V. G. Storchak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c14891. [25] M. Milivojević, M. Orozović, S. Picozzi, M. Gmitra, S. Stavrić, 2D M...
work page Pith review arXiv 2024
-
[54]
P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864. [55] V. Wang, N. Xu, J. C. Liu, G. Tang, W. T. Geng, (Preprint) arXiv, 1908.08269, v6, submitted: May, 2021. [56] G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [57] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [58] G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758. [5...
work page Pith review arXiv 1964
Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.