Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Thermal spin wave noise as a probe for the Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya interaction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the amplitude of thermal spin-wave noise from domain walls and skyrmions, read by a single NV center, encodes the sign and handedness of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.

desk verdict NV relaxometry spin-wave noise is a genuinely new DMI-sign probe, but the sign leg currently rests on one uncontrolled null comparison; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03166 v1 pith:HYH6DWGJ submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

Aurore Finco , Pawan Kumar , Van Tuong Pham , Joseba Urrestarazu-Larrañaga , Rodrigo Guedas Garcia , Maxime Rollo , Olivier Boulle , Joo-Von Kim
show 1 more author
Vincent Jacques
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nitrogen-vacancycenterrelaxometryDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionthermalspin-wavenoisedomainwallsskyrmionsmagneticchiralitynonreciprocalspinwavessyntheticantiferromagnets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the handedness of chiral magnetic textures can be read directly from the amplitude of thermal spin-wave noise measured with a scanning nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center. The authors argue that in a perpendicularly magnetized film, spin waves trapped inside a domain wall have a DMI-split, nonreciprocal dispersion, and that the stray field they produce is pushed preferentially to one side of the film, like the one-sided flux of a Halbach array. Because the NV center filters the noise by frequency and by wavevector, the detected noise level above a wall depends on which wavevector direction is thermally populated, and that depends on the sign of the DMI. They support the claim with numerical noise maps and with relaxometry measurements on synthetic antiferromagnets, where left-handed Néel walls give a clear noise signal and right-handed walls give almost none. They further show that the angular distribution of noise around skyrmion contours reveals their Néel or Bloch character.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the combination of nonreciprocal spin-wave dispersion inside chiral textures and wavevector-dependent one-sided stray fields. Inside a Néel domain wall the dispersion satisfies $\omega(k) \neq \omega(-k)$ because DMI and dipolar interactions break inversion symmetry; at the NV's frequency filter this makes the thermal occupation $n(k) \simeq k_B T/\hbar\omega(k)$ unequal for opposite $k$. The stray field of a wall-confined spin wave is the magnetic analogue of a Halbach array: in-plane and out-of-plane contributions cancel on one side of the film and reinforce on the other, so which side radiates depends on the sign of $k$ and on the wall chirality. The NV center acts as a double filter, frequency-selective near its zero-field resonance and wavevector-selective through the kernel $k e^{-2 k d_{\mathrm{NV}}} (1 - e^{-2 k t})$, so the detected relaxation rate is dominated by one propagation direction set by the sign of $D$.

What would settle it

Measure the NV relaxometry signal above the same domain wall from both sides of the film, using probes with the same standoff distance; if the wall that appears noisy from one side also appears noisy from the other, or if the predicted handedness contrast is reversed for a sample whose DMI sign is independently known from Brillouin light scattering, the central claim would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is a qualitative variant of spin-wave DMI metrology: the sign of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction can be inferred from the amplitude of magnetic noise emitted by confined thermal spin waves and detected by an NV center, without needing to resolve the spin-wave dispersion directly. For a 180° Néel wall, the DMI makes the dispersion nonreciprocal, so modes with opposite wavevector have different thermal populations; simultaneously, the wall's in-plane magnetization fluctuations generate a stray field that is one-sided, with the dominant side set by the wavevector direction and wall chirality. The NV's frequency filtering near 2.87 GHz and wavevector filtering at roughly $1/d_{\mathrm{NV}}$ select one branch, and the resulting $T_1$ shortening, seen as a photoluminescence drop, is therefore stronger for one wall handedness. The same mechanism makes the noise around a skyrmion contour nonuniform, with an angular pattern that depends on whether the boundary is Néel or Bloch and on the chirality; measured contours on synthetic antiferromagnet skyrmions match the Néel-left prediction, while Bloch predictions differ qualitatively.

Load-bearing premise

The whole contrast mechanism rests on the assumption that spin waves confined in a Néel wall radiate a one-sided stray field whose dominant side is locked to the wavevector direction and wall chirality, and that the blank noise map seen through the membrane is caused by that one-sided flux rather than by the larger standoff, a different probe, or sample artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single scanning relaxometry map can identify the sign of the interfacial DMI in a sample with domain walls, rather than requiring Brillouin light scattering or spin-orbit-torque measurements.
  • The angular modulation of noise around skyrmion contours distinguishes Néel from Bloch skyrmions and can indicate their chirality, which is otherwise only accessible through quantitative stray-field imaging.
  • The method extends naturally to low-stray-field systems such as synthetic antiferromagnets, ferrimagnets, and antiferromagnets, where small static fields do not disturb the NV center's spin-state mixing.
  • Because the signal depends on the nonreciprocal occupation of confined spin-wave modes, it provides a way to probe spin waves in nanoscale textures that are difficult to address with conventional magnonic techniques.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the wall-versus-domain noise contrast is calibrated against a sample with known D, the same relaxometry measurement could yield a quantitative D value, not just its sign, by matching the measured ratio to simulated curves such as the D-dependence shown in Fig. 1(d).
  • Inference: the one-sided-flux mechanism predicts a mirror asymmetry, so reversing the sensing side of the film should swap which wall handedness appears noisy; this can be tested on the same stack with two probes or after flipping the sample.
  • Inference: the angular noise pattern around a single skyrmion might map local DMI inhomogeneity, since variations in D should show up as variations in contour contrast around one skyrmion.
  • Inference: the method could be applied to chiral domain walls in ferrimagnets near compensation, where small stray fields and gigahertz dynamics make other probes difficult.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that scanning NV-center relaxometry can probe the sign and strength of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) by detecting magnetic noise from thermally excited spin waves confined in domain walls and skyrmions. The mechanism combines two effects: the DMI-induced nonreciprocal spin-wave dispersion, which makes the wavevector population in a Néel wall asymmetric, and the one-sided stray field of the spin-wave helix (a Halbach-array-like configuration), which makes the noise detected above the film depend on the direction of the wavevector. The authors support the idea with micromagnetic noise calculations (Fig. 1) and two experiments on synthetic antiferromagnets: a strong relaxometry contrast above left-handed Néel walls (Fig. 2) and a blank noise map above right-handed walls measured through a SiN membrane (Fig. 3). They also analyze the noise distribution along the contour of skyrmions and find an angular modulation consistent with Néel rather than Bloch skyrmions (Fig. 4).

Significance. If the mechanism and the experimental validation are correct, this work offers a new, label-free approach to determine the chirality of magnetic textures and the sign of interfacial DMI, which could be particularly useful for low-moment systems such as ferrimagnets and antiferromagnets where existing techniques are difficult to apply. The theoretical idea is physically well motivated, and the numerical model is credible, using material parameters from prior work and including disorder in the skyrmion simulations. The skyrmion contour analysis, averaged over 19 objects, is a novel observation. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction: the noise contrast should vanish or reverse when the wall chirality is reversed, a prediction that the authors attempt to test. However, the experimental support for the sign-inference claim is currently incomplete, as detailed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, Figs. 2 and 3] The central claim that the noise amplitude encodes the sign of D is supported by only one comparison, between Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, and those two measurements differ in several control parameters: standoff (62 vs 72 nm), diamond probe, substrate (Si/SiO2 vs SiN membrane), and measurement side (top vs through the membrane). Because the relaxometry signal depends on the filter function ke^{-2kdNV}, and because the membrane can introduce scattering or stress artifacts, the null result in Fig. 3 does not uniquely establish the predicted suppression for the opposite chirality. The single-layer control with identical probe and dNV is only mentioned in the text as Fig. S1 and is described as lower quality. To secure the sign-inference claim, the authors should present the controlled equal-standoff comparison in the main text with a statistical analysis of the null, or provide a quantitative calculation of the expected noise at dNV = 72 nm showing that the mechanism would still be detectable if present.
  2. [Main text, section 'Going a step further', Fig. 4] The conclusion that skyrmion noise maps give 'insight into the strength of DMI involved in their stabilization' is not supported by the presented data. The measured observable is the normalized PL decrease along the skyrmion contour; the simulations in Fig. 4 show that left- and right-handed Néel skyrmions have the same angular profile (maximum at φ = 0) and differ only in the overall noise amplitude. Without an absolute calibration relating the PL decrease to the noise power, the experiment cannot distinguish left from right chirality, and therefore cannot provide quantitative information on the DMI strength. The text should either restrict the claim to distinguishing Néel from Bloch character, or provide a quantitative amplitude calibration and a comparison with the simulated absolute noise levels.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase 'the sign of the DMI can be inferred from the amplitude of the detected noise' overstates the current evidence. In both experimental samples the DMI sign was already known from prior work (Ref. 40), and the measurement confirms the expected correlation rather than demonstrating inference on an unknown sample. Given the confounds identified in the Fig. 2/Fig. 3 comparison, the wording should be revised to present this as a proof-of-principle demonstration on samples with known DMI sign, or a blind test on a sample of unknown sign should be added.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Abstract] The name 'Dzyaloshinskii' is misspelled as 'Dzyaloshinkii' in the title, the abstract, and the main text; it should be corrected throughout.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains typographical errors: '(b) Stray field map measured simultaneously with (b)' should refer to panel (a), and the phrases '(c)-(d) Relaxation time curves measured above a domain (b) or above a domain wall (c)' use the wrong panel labels.
  3. [Fig. 1(c)] The statement 'No data is shown for small k in the domain wall because a perfectly straight wall is unstable under these conditions' is unclear; the authors should briefly explain how this truncation affects the computed noise levels, since the noise integral may depend on the excluded modes.
  4. [Text near Eq. (1) (k-filter function)] The filter function ke^{-2kdNV}(1-e^{-2kt}) is introduced without defining t; the film thickness should be defined at first use to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Experimental sample description] The paragraph introducing the SAF stack (Fig. 2a) states that the wall is expected to be left-handed Néel because of the Pt/Co DMI, but it does not explain how the two Co layers in the synthetic antiferromagnet contribute to the net DMI; a brief clarification would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted noise asymmetry is computed from the DMI-modified spin-wave dispersion and a parameter-free one-sided stray-field argument, then compared with experiment; self-citations provide method and prior D values, not the conclusion.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The predicted noise maps in Figs. 1(f)-(g) and the contour-dependent skyrmion noise in Figs. 4(c)-(f) are forward calculations from the DMI-modified spin-wave dispersion and the wavevector-dependent stray-field filter, using material parameters reported in prior sample characterization (Ref. 40). No parameter is fitted to the measured noise maps, and the skyrmion chirality conclusion is obtained by comparing the measured angular PL modulation against four independently simulated texture types (Bloch/Néel, left/right), not by construction from the data. The self-citations are methodological or independently measured inputs: Ref. 18 provides the relaxometry protocol and prior observation of wall noise, Ref. 29 provides the quantitative NV response model, and Ref. 40 supplies the independently measured D value for the same stack. None of these self-citations defines the predicted asymmetry or forces the experimental conclusion. The Halbach one-sided flux mechanism is imported from external Refs. 37 and 38, not from the authors' prior work. The main experimental weakness, namely the different standoff and membrane geometry between the two chiralities in Figs. 2 and 3, is a potential confound that affects the strength of the experimental inference, but it is a correctness/control issue, not a circular reduction of the claim to its inputs. The paper itself flags the lower quality of the single-layer control, which is a data-quality limitation rather than a circular step. Overall, no specific equation or fitted parameter is reused as the predicted output, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses standard micromagnetics (Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert, MuMax3) and the known interfacial DMI form; no new physical entity is introduced. The thermal occupation n(k) = kBT/hbar omega(k) and the NV relaxometry filter function are standard. The DMI strength for the experimental sample is taken from a prior measurement (Ref. 40), not fit to the noise data. The main modeling choice is the 1% anisotropy disorder amplitude and the idealized straight-wall dispersion.

free parameters (1)
  • Perpendicular anisotropy disorder amplitude = 1% (chosen, not fitted)
    In the skyrmion noise simulations, 20 disorder realizations with a 1% fluctuation of the perpendicular anisotropy were used to generate pinned skyrmion shapes; this amplitude is a modeling choice that sets the width of the predicted contour distribution and is not fitted to the measured noise data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Interfacial DMI at a Pt/Co interface produces left- or right-handed Neel walls depending on the sign of D; the wall handedness is fixed by the stack order.
    Invoked in the experimental sections to identify the expected wall type in the two samples: left-handed Neel with D = 0.62 ± 0.24 mJ/m2 for the normal stack, and the reversed effective sign when measuring through the back (Fig. 3).
  • domain assumption Thermal occupation of spin wave modes follows n(k) = kBT/hbar omega(k) in the long-wavelength limit.
    Used to convert the nonreciprocal dispersion into unequal populations n(k) ≠ n(-k), the origin of the DMI-dependent noise asymmetry.
  • standard math The NV relaxometry rate is governed by the magnetic noise spectral density at the NV resonance, with the double filtering (frequency and wavevector) described in Refs. 18 and 29.
    The central observable (PL decrease) is modeled with this standard quantum sensing framework; the wavevector filter ke^{-2kdNV}(1-e^{-2kt}) is used to compute noise levels.
  • domain assumption The domain-wall spin wave dispersion is nonreciprocal with a narrow frequency gap, computed following Refs. 26-28.
    The nonreciprocity is the physical input that makes the thermal population imbalance and thus the noise asymmetry possible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal spin wave noise as a probe for the Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HYH6DWGJ

@misc{pith2026250203166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal spin wave noise as a probe for the Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HYH6DWGJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03166}
}
read the original abstract

Interfacial Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya interaction (DMI) is a key ingredient in the stabilization of chiral magnetic states in thin films. Its sign and strength often determine crucial properties of magnetic objects, like their topology or how they can be manipulated with currents. A few experimental techniques are currently available to measure DMI quantitatively, based on the study of domain walls, spin waves, or spin-orbit torques. In this work, we propose a qualitative variant of spin wave methods. We rely on magnetic noise from confined thermal spin waves in domain walls and skyrmions in perpendicularly magnetized thin films, which we probe with scanning NV center relaxometry. We show both numerically and experimentally that the sign of the DMI can be inferred from the amplitude of the detected noise, which is affected by the non-reciprocity in the spin wave dispersion. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that the noise distribution around the contour of magnetic skyrmions reveals their N\'eel/Bloch nature, giving therefore also insight into the strength of DMI involved in their stabilization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03166 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the considered out-of-plane magnetized Co layer. (b)-(c) Calculated spin wave dispersion in the Co layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Noise map of the SAF sketched on the left, mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Noise map showing three skyrmions. The PL sig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. A. Sinitsyn and Y. V. Pershin, The theory of spin noise spectroscopy: A review, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 106501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Oestreich, M

    M. Oestreich, M. R¨ omer, R. J. Haug, and D. H¨ agele, Spin Noise Spectroscopy in GaAs, Physical Review Letters95, 216603 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    S. A. Crooker, J. Brandt, C. Sandfort, A. Greilich, D. R. Yakovlev, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and M. Bayer, Spin Noise of Electrons and Holes in Self-Assembled Quantum Dots, Physical Review Letters 104, 036601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Jonsson, P

    T. Jonsson, P. Nordblad, and P. Svedlindh, Dynamic study of dipole-dipole interaction effects in a magnetic nanoparticle system, Physical Review B 57, 497 (1998)

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    B. C. Stipe, H. J. Mamin, T. D. Stowe, T. W. Kenny, and D. Rugar, Magnetic Dissipation and Fluctuations in Individual Nanomagnets Measured by Ultrasensitive Cantilever Magnetometry, Physical Review Letters 86, 2874 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Tetienne, T

    J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, L. Rondin, A. Cavaill` es, L. Mayer, G. Dantelle, T. Gacoin, J. Wrachtrup, J.- F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Spin relaxometry of single nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond nanocrystals for magnetic noise sensing, Physical Review B 87, 235436 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Schmid-Lorch, T

    D. Schmid-Lorch, T. H¨ aberle, F. Reinhard, A. Zappe, M. Slota, L. Bogani, A. Finkler, and J. Wrachtrup, Re- laxometry and Dephasing Imaging of Superparamagnetic Magnetite Nanoparticles Using a Single Qubit, Nano Let- ters 15, 4942 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    A. L. Balk, M. D. Stiles, and J. Unguris, Critical behav- ior of zero-field magnetic fluctuations in perpendicularly magnetized thin films, Physical Review B 90, 184404 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    van der Sar, F

    T. van der Sar, F. Casola, R. Walsworth, and A. Ya- coby, Nanometre-scale probing of spin waves using single electron spins, Nature Communications 6, 7886 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    C. Du, T. van der Sar, T. X. Zhou, P. Upadhyaya, F. Casola, H. Zhang, M. C. Onbasli, C. A. Ross, R. L. Walsworth, Y. Tserkovnyak, and A. Yacoby, Control and local measurement of the spin chemical potential in a magnetic insulator, Science 357, 195 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    H. Wang, S. Zhang, N. J. McLaughlin, B. Flebus, M. Huang, Y. Xiao, C. Liu, M. Wu, E. E. Fuller- ton, Y. Tserkovnyak, and C. R. Du, Noninvasive mea- surements of spin transport properties of an anti- ferromagnetic insulator, Science Advances 10.1126/sci- adv.abg8562 (2022)

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Rondin, J.-P

    L. Rondin, J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V. Jacques, Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 056503 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Ariyaratne, D

    A. Ariyaratne, D. Bluvstein, B. A. Myers, and A. C. B. Jayich, Nanoscale electrical conductivity imaging using a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Nature Communi- cations 9, 2406 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Flebus, H

    B. Flebus, H. Ochoa, P. Upadhyaya, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Proposal for dynamic imaging of antiferromagnetic do- main wall via quantum-impurity relaxometry, Physical Review B 98, 180409(R) (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Dzyaloshinskii, Theory of helicoidal structures in an- tiferromagnets

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, Theory of helicoidal structures in an- tiferromagnets. I. Nonmetals, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 960 (1964)

    1964

  9. [17]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Physical Review 120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Physical Review 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  10. [18]

    Finco, A

    A. Finco, A. Haykal, R. Tanos, F. Fabre, S. Chouaieb, W. Akhtar, I. Robert-Philip, W. Legrand, F. Ajejas, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, T. Devolder, J.-P. Adam, J.- V. Kim, V. Cros, and V. Jacques, Imaging non-collinear antiferromagnetic textures via single spin relaxometry, Natu...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Fert and P

    A. Fert and P. M. Levy, Role of Anisotropic Exchange In- teractions in Determining the Properties of Spin-Glasses, Physical Review Letters 44, 1538 (1980)

    1980

  12. [20]

    Cr´ epieux and C

    A. Cr´ epieux and C. Lacroix, Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya in- teractions induced by symmetry breaking at a surface, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 182, 341 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    M. Bode, M. Heide, K. von Bergmann, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, G. Bihlmayer, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, S. Bl¨ ugel, and R. Wiesendanger, Chiral magnetic order at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry, Nature 447, 190 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Udvardi and L

    L. Udvardi and L. Szunyogh, Chiral Asymmetry of the Spin-Wave Spectra in Ultrathin Magnetic Films, Physical Review Letters 102, 207204 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P

    D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no and P. Landeros, Influence of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction on the spin-wave spec- tra of thin films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 25, 156001 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Moon, S.-M

    J.-H. Moon, S.-M. Seo, K.-J. Lee, K.-W. Kim, J. Ryu, H.-W. Lee, R. D. McMichael, and M. D. Stiles, Spin-wave propagation in the presence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction, Physical Review B88, 184404 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Kuepferling, A

    M. Kuepferling, A. Casiraghi, G. Soares, G. Durin, F. Garcia-Sanchez, L. Chen, C. H. Back, C. H. Mar- rows, S. Tacchi, and G. Carlotti, Measuring interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ultrathin magnetic films, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 015003 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Garcia-Sanchez, P

    F. Garcia-Sanchez, P. Borys, R. Soucaille, J.-P. Adam, 6 R. L. Stamps, and J.-V. Kim, Narrow Magnonic Waveg- uides Based on Domain Walls, Physical Review Letters 114, 247206 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Henry, D

    Y. Henry, D. Stoeffler, J.-V. Kim, and M. Bailleul, Uni- directional spin-wave channeling along magnetic domain walls of Bloch type, Physical Review B 100, 024416 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    It includes refs

    See Supplemental Material at [link] with additional data on a single ferromagnetic layer, calculations of the spin wave dispersion when varying D and of expected noise levels at different distances from the film, the prepara- tion of the samples, the probe-to-sample distance c...

  21. [29]

    Rollo, A

    M. Rollo, A. Finco, R. Tanos, F. Fabre, T. Devolder, I. Robert-Philip, and V. Jacques, Quantitative study of the response of a single NV defect in diamond to magnetic noise, Physical Review B 103, 235418 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    B. A. McCullian, A. M. Thabt, B. A. Gray, A. L. Me- lendez, M. S. Wolf, V. L. Safonov, D. V. Pelekhov, V. P. Bhallamudi, M. R. Page, and P. C. Hammel, Broadband multi-magnon relaxometry using a quantum spin sensor for high frequency ferromagnetic dynamics sensing, Na- ture Com...

    2020

  23. [31]

    Lee-Wong, R

    E. Lee-Wong, R. Xue, F. Ye, A. Kreisel, T. van der Sar, A. Yacoby, and C. R. Du, Nanoscale Detection of Magnon Excitations with Variable Wavevectors Through a Quan- tum Spin Sensor, Nano Letters 20, 3284 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Bertelli, J

    I. Bertelli, J. J. Carmiggelt, T. Yu, B. G. Simon, C. C. Pothoven, G. E. W. Bauer, Y. M. Blanter, J. Aarts, and T. van der Sar, Magnetic resonance imaging of spin-wave transport and interference in a magnetic insulator, Sci- ence Advances 6, eabd3556 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    T. X. Zhou, J. J. Carmiggelt, L. M. G¨ achter, I. Es- terlis, D. Sels, R. J. St¨ ohr, C. Du, D. Fernandez, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, F. B¨ uttner, E. Demler, and A. Yacoby, A magnon scattering platform, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 118, e2019473118 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Bertelli, B

    I. Bertelli, B. G. Simon, T. Yu, J. Aarts, G. E. W. Bauer, Y. M. Blanter, and T. van der Sar, Imaging Spin-Wave Damping Underneath Metals Using Electron Spins in Diamond, Advanced Quantum Technologies 4, 2100094 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    B. G. Simon, S. Kurdi, J. J. Carmiggelt, M. Borst, A. J. Katan, and T. van der Sar, Filtering and Imaging of Frequency-Degenerate Spin Waves Using Nanoposition- ing of a Single-Spin Sensor, Nano Letters22, 9198 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Koerner, R

    C. Koerner, R. Dreyer, M. Wagener, N. Liebing, H. G. Bauer, and G. Woltersdorf, Frequency multiplication by collective nanoscale spin-wave dynamics, Science 375, 1165 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Devolder, Propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy using inductive antennas: Conditions for unidirectional energy flow, Physical Review Applied 20, 054057 (2023)

    T. Devolder, Propagating-spin-wave spectroscopy using inductive antennas: Conditions for unidirectional energy flow, Physical Review Applied 20, 054057 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Mallinson, One-sided fluxes – A magnetic curiosity?, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 9, 678 (1973)

    J. Mallinson, One-sided fluxes – A magnetic curiosity?, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 9, 678 (1973)

    1973

  31. [39]

    Legrand, D

    W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vec- chiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Room-temperature stabilization of antiferromag- netic skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nature Materials 19, 34 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    V. T. Pham, N. Sisodia, I. Di Manici, J. Urrestarazu- Larra˜ naga, K. Bairagi, J. Pelloux-Prayer, R. Guedas, L. D. Buda-Prejbeanu, S. Auffret, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mente¸ s, S. Pizzini, P. Kumar, A. Finco, V. Jacques, G. Gaudin, and O. Boulle, Fast current-induced skyrmion moti...

    2024

  33. [41]

    Tetienne, L

    J.-P. Tetienne, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, M. Chipaux, T. Debuisschert, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Magnetic- field-dependent photodynamics of single NV defects in diamond: An application to qualitative all-optical mag- netic imaging, New Journal of Physics 14, 103033 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Hingant, J.-P

    T. Hingant, J.-P. Tetienne, L. J. Mart ´ ınez, K. Garcia, D. Ravelosona, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Measuring the Magnetic Moment Density in Patterned Ultrathin Ferromagnets with Submicrometer Resolution, Physical Review Applied 4, 014003 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Leliaert, J

    J. Leliaert, J. Mulkers, J. D. Clercq, A. Coene, M. Dvornik, and B. V. Waeyenberge, Adaptively time stepping the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation at nonzero temperature: Implementation and validation in MuMax 3, AIP Advances 7, 125010 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garc ´ ıa-S´ anchez, and B. V. Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Advances 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.