Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Super-diffusion of Photoexcited Carriers in Topological Insulator Nanoribbons

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Ultrafast photovoltage microscopy finds photoexcited carriers in Sb-doped Bi2Se3 nanoribbons diffusing at up to 800 cm²/s at 21 K, two to three orders above band-edge values, and travelling micrometers within hundreds of picoseconds.

desk verdict A real ultrafast microscopy result whose headline diffusivity needs a validation step before it can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03558 v1 pith:3SDBAUIT submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topologicalinsulatornanoribbontransientphotovoltagemicroscopycarrierdiffusionsuper-diffusionexcitoncondensationBi2Se3hotcarriers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that photoexcited carriers in Sb-doped Bi2Se3 topological insulator nanoribbons can diffuse at speeds up to 800 cm²/s at 21 K, two to three orders of magnitude faster than ordinary band-edge carriers in the same material class, and can travel as far as 10 µm within hundreds of picoseconds. The authors establish this with ultrafast transient photovoltage microscopy, which images the spatial spread of a laser-generated carrier packet in time. They argue that the fluence, temperature, and gate dependences of the fast transport are hard to explain by hot carriers alone and are consistent with exciton condensation. If the claim holds, it would support the idea that topological insulators can host high-temperature exciton condensates and give optics a practical handle on ultrafast spin and charge transport.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is ultrafast transient photovoltage microscopy (TPVM): a focused pump pulse writes a carrier packet in the nanoribbon, and a time-delayed, spatially scanned probe pulse measures the local photovoltage suppression caused by nonlinear recombination with those carriers. The central observable is the Gaussian width $R$ of the photovoltage dip along the ribbon; growth of $R^2-R_0^2$ with delay time gives the one-dimensional diffusivity through $D=(R^2-R_0^2)/2\delta t$. A continuity equation with a density-dependent escape time reproduces the fluence-, spot-size-, temperature-, and gate-dependent recovery traces, tying the fast transport to carrier escape from the excitation spot rather than to fast recombination.

What would settle it

With the pump fixed near one end of a nanoribbon, record $R^2-R_0^2$ versus $\delta t$ while the probe fluence is varied at fixed pump fluence; if the inferred $D$ changes with probe fluence, or if the width saturates well below 10 µm at delays near 400 ps, the long-range diffusive-spreading interpretation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spatially resolved, time-resolved photovoltage measurement on bulk-insulating Bi2−xSbxSe3 nanoribbons reveals super-diffusion of photoexcited carriers: the variance of the photovoltage dip grows as $R^2-R_0^2 = 2D\,\delta t$ (linear in delay, so 'super-diffusion' here means an unusually large diffusivity rather than anomalous power-law spreading), with $D$ up to about 800 cm²/s at 21 K. That is two to three orders above the band-edge diffusivity of roughly 10 cm²/s estimated from the best bulk Bi2Se3 mobilities. The diffusivity falls as pump fluence increases, is largest when the gate tunes the Fermi level to the Dirac point, and drops at higher temperature yet survives to at least 180 K. The paper interprets these trends as favoring exciton condensation over hot-carrier transport, because hot-carrier diffusivity should increase with fluence and thermalize within a few picoseconds, while the observed long-lived fast motion can be accommodated by a condensate that dynamically interconverts with free carriers and therefore still appears diffusive.

Load-bearing premise

The measured growth of the photovoltage dip's Gaussian width is interpreted as pure diffusive spreading of the first pulse's carrier packet, with no delay-dependent contribution from pump-induced electric fields, trapped charges, or a changing generation profile.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At cryogenic temperatures the same nanoribbon system can move photoexcited carriers across multiple micrometers in under a nanosecond, which is what the nonlocal photocurrent signals seen in prior work would require.
  • The diffusivity is tunable by gate voltage: transport is fastest near the Dirac point and slows when the device is doped away from intrinsic, so carrier mobility in these ribbons can be controlled electrostatically.
  • Observed diffusive spreading does not rule out exciton condensation; free-carrier–exciton interconversion can mask ballistic motion, so future experiments should look for a ballistic-to-diffusive crossover at lower fluence.
  • The TPVM method itself is a generally applicable way to measure ultrafast carrier diffusion in low-dimensional materials, and the same instrument can be used on other topological or layered systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, if the condensate interpretation is right, a lower-fluence or thinner-ribbon version of this experiment should show the Gaussian variance growing faster than linearly in $\delta t$ once the condensate fraction dominates; the current data only reach the linear regime.
  • Because the extracted $D$ rests on a Gaussian fit to the photovoltage width, an independent check by time-resolved photocurrent decay length or by magnetotransport at matched carrier densities would separate genuine carrier mobility from apparent broadening induced by trapped-charge fields.
  • Also beyond the paper, applying the same TPVM measurement to other three-dimensional topological insulators, such as Bi2Te3-based nanoribbons, would test whether the super-diffusion is generic to Dirac surface states or specific to Sb-doped Bi2Se3.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports transient photovoltage (TPV) and transient photovoltage microscopy (TPVM) measurements on Sb-doped Bi2Se3 nanoribbons. The probe-induced photovoltage is suppressed by a pump pulse, with recovery times that increase with pump fluence and laser spot size. The authors model the recovery with a continuity equation incorporating density-dependent escape and recombination. The central quantitative claim is obtained from TPVM: the spatial width R of the photovoltage dip grows as R^2 - R0^2 = 2D δt, yielding D up to 800 cm^2/s at 21 K, two to three orders of magnitude above band-edge diffusivity. The data also show faster recovery when the Fermi level is tuned near the Dirac point and at low temperatures. The authors discuss hot-carrier and exciton-condensation mechanisms.

Significance. If the width-based extraction is valid, the result is significant: it would demonstrate extremely fast and long-range transport of photoexcited carriers in a topological insulator, with implications for exciton condensation and optospintronics. The TPVM technique itself is valuable, and the raw dataset is rich. The internal consistency of the trends (fluence, temperature, gate) and the fact that the central D value is not derived from the fitted model are strengths. However, the quantitative claim hinges on an untested assumption about the relationship between the dip width and carrier-density variance, and the supporting simulation uses parameters chosen to match the data. The paper currently overstates the security of its headline number.

major comments (2)
  1. [TPVM measurements (Fig. 5)] The extraction D = (R^2 - R0^2)/2δt assumes the Gaussian width of the photovoltage dip tracks the second moment of the photoexcited carrier density. The dip is a saturating, nonlinear signal (Fig. 1(e) shows -100% suppression at high fluence) and the model in Eq. (1) includes density-dependent escape and bimolecular recombination. Under saturation, the fitted width of a clipped profile is controlled by the plateau edges and need not evolve as the true variance. Because the headline D values and the 10 μm travel distance all follow from this step, the authors should validate the extraction by feeding the continuity model with a known D, generating synthetic TPVM maps under the experimental fluence range, and showing that the same Gaussian-fit analysis recovers R^2 - R0^2 = 2Dδt. The statement on p.12 that the TPVM results 'can also be simulated' is insufficient without this quantitative check.
  2. [Modeling results (Eq. 1, Figs. 3a-d)] The simulation agreement is not an independent confirmation because the escape-time parameters (τe0, n0, k2, a, b) are explicitly 'chosen to best match our experimental results' (p.7). The paper should provide a sensitivity analysis and, where possible, constrain the parameters with independent measurements (e.g., the recombination rates from ref. 16) rather than fitting to the same TPV data. This matters because the recovery-time analysis underpins the inference of density-dependent diffusivity and the claim that escape dominates recombination; as written, the model's agreement cannot serve as independent evidence for those conclusions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and abstract] The phenomenon is called 'super-diffusion,' but Fig. 5(b) shows R^2 - R0^2 linear in δt, which is ordinary Fickian diffusion. 'Super-diffusion' conventionally denotes anomalous MSD ~ t^α with α > 1. The authors should either rename the phenomenon (e.g., 'ultrafast diffusion' or 'giant diffusivity') or provide evidence for an anomalous exponent.
  2. [Comparison to band-edge carriers (p.12)] The conversion of mobility to diffusivity uses the Einstein relation D = μ k_B T / e, but the temperature at which μ = 10^4 cm^2/Vs is quoted and the resulting D = 10 cm^2/s should be stated explicitly; otherwise the 'two to three orders of magnitude' comparison is hard to reproduce.
  3. [Experimental conditions (Methods, 80 MHz repetition)] The laser repetition rate is 80 MHz, corresponding to a 12.5 ns period, while the longest TPV recovery time is about 1600 ps. The possible cumulative effect of residual carriers or trapped charges from previous pulses should be discussed, especially given the persistent trapping invoked on the probe-first side.
  4. [Fig. 5(c) error bars] The shaded areas in Fig. 5(c) are described only as 'the uncertainty obtained from curve fitting'; the procedure for propagating the Gaussian-fit uncertainties into the linear-fit D values should be described in the main text or Methods.
  5. [Eq. (1) and trapping term] The escape time τe(n) = τe0 (n/n0)^a (npump/n0)^b introduces a dependence on the pump-injected density npump even in the probe-first configuration; this is attributed to light-induced trapping, but the physical picture is only sketched. A more explicit justification or a reference to the model's derivation would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Reported diffusivity is extracted directly from TPVM width data, so the core claim is not circular; partial circularity appears in the fitted continuity model and the self-cited exciton-condensation interpretation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction (second paragraph) and Discussion; ref. 13]
    "We have recently observed highly dissipationless transport of photogenerated carriers in TIs, indicating the formation of exciton condensates. 13 ... An alternative mechanism that accounts for the observed super-diffusion is via exciton condensation."

    Ref. 13 is the authors' own prior report on the same nanoribbons, and it is the only cited basis for asserting that exciton condensates exist in this material. The Discussion then invokes that asserted condensate as the explanation for the measured super-diffusion, saying the TPV results are 'all consistent with this mechanism.' Thus the mechanistic conclusion rests on a self-citation chain. The measured diffusivity values themselves come from the TPVM Gaussian widths and do not reduce to this citation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Continuity model discussion (before Fig. 3) and TPVM discussion (Fig. S9)]
    "These parameters were chosen to best match our experimental results and are consistent with field effect characteristics and previously measured recombination rates. 16 ... The TPVM results can also be simulated using the previous model based on the continuity equation, shown in Figure S9."

    The model's free parameters (τe0, n0, k2, a, b) are fitted to the same TPV recovery curves that the paper presents the simulation as reproducing, so this 'agreement' is by construction rather than an independent test. The later claim that the TPVM map 'can also be simulated' with the same fitted model is likewise a consistency check on fitted inputs. This does not undermine the headline D measurement, which is obtained directly from R^2−R0^2 = 2Dδt, but it means the model-based confirmation is not independent.

full rationale

The central claim of the paper is the measured photoexcited-carrier diffusivity of up to 800 cm^2/s and the associated ~10 μm travel range. These numbers are derived from TPVM spatial profiles: each horizontal cut is fitted to a Gaussian and D is read from the growth of R^2−R0^2 with delay. That extraction is a direct observable, not a quantity defined by the model. The auxiliary diffusion-recombination model is tuned to the global TPV data and then shown to be consistent with those same data and the TPVM map; this is a fitted reproduction rather than an independent prediction, so it raises the circularity level modestly. The exciton-condensation explanation is supported largely by the authors' ref. 13, also a self-citation. Because the reported D does not reduce to either the fitted model or the self-citation, the paper is only partially circular (score 4), not fundamentally circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central diffusivity measurement rests on standard Gaussian diffusion analysis; the modeling adds five fitted parameters. No new particles or forces are introduced. The exciton condensate is an interpretation borrowed from prior work (ref 13), not a new entity.

free parameters (5)
  • tau_e0 (escape time prefactor) = 50 ps
    Prefactor of escape time in Eq. (1); fitted to low-fluence recovery time.
  • n0 (dark electron density) = 10^19 cm^-3
    Dark carrier density used in the escape-time scaling; inferred from field-effect data.
  • k2 (bimolecular recombination coefficient) = 10^-11 cm^3/s
    Bimolecular recombination coefficient taken from ref [16]; not measured here.
  • a (power-law exponent) = 0.85
    Power-law exponent for carrier-density dependence of escape time; fitted to fluence-dependent TPV.
  • b (power-law exponent) = 0.3
    Power-law exponent for pump-density dependence on the probe-first side; fitted.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Photovoltage recovery is dominated by carrier escape from the laser spot, not by recombination.
    Spot-size dependence supports it, but Eq. (1) assumes it.
  • domain assumption Carrier dynamics follow a continuity equation with a carrier-density-dependent escape time and negligible Auger recombination.
    Eq. (1) and subsequent text.
  • domain assumption The sample is n-type with n0 >> p0, and light generates equal electrons and holes.
    Stated simplification in Eq. (1).
  • standard math The spatial broadening of the TPVM dip follows 1D Gaussian diffusion with variance R^2-R0^2 = 2D δt.
    Standard diffusive broadening; used to extract D from Fig. 5.
  • domain assumption The bimolecular recombination coefficient k2=1e-11 cm^3/s and dark density n0=1e19 cm^-3 are representative for these devices.
    Taken from ref [16] and field-effect estimates; used in simulation.
  • domain assumption Laser heating estimate assumes main heat dissipation through the SiO2 layer.
    Used to estimate temperature rise at high fluence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Super-diffusion of Photoexcited Carriers in Topological Insulator Nanoribbons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SDBAUIT

@misc{pith2026250203558,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Super-diffusion of Photoexcited Carriers in Topological Insulator Nanoribbons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SDBAUIT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03558}
}
abstract

Understanding the ultrafast dynamics and transport of photoexcited carriers in topological insulators is crucial for the optical manipulation of spins and may shed light on the nature of topological excitons. Here we investigate bulk-insulating Sb-doped $\mathrm{Bi_2Se_3}$ nanoribbons via ultrafast transient photovoltage microscopy. The probe-pulse-induced photovoltage is substantially suppressed by a pump pulse. Recovery time increases from 50 to 1600 picoseconds as the pump fluence increases. We found that the diffusivity of photoexcited carriers increases significantly at lower carrier concentrations, up to 800 cm$^2$/s at 21 K, two to three orders of magnitude higher than that of band-edge carriers. Remarkably, the photoexcited carriers travel up to 10 $\mu$m for hundreds of picoseconds at this high diffusivity. The diffusivity peaks in intrinsic devices and is reduced at high temperatures. We discuss the possible mechanisms of long-ranged super-diffusion in the frames of hot carriers and exciton condensation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03558 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. TPV measurements of a Bi2−xSbxSe3 nanoribbon FET at 13 K. (a) Cartoon of the TPV measurement where consecutive laser pulses with delay time δt are focused out of the device channel. (b) Schematic of the experimental setup. (c) Top: Photocurrent map obtained at 12 K by scanning the laser with 690 nm wavelength and 6.1 µJ cm−2 fluence. Bottom: Device’s optical image. (d) Fluence-dependent photocurrent and EQE with the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Laser spot diameter dependence of TPV. Simulated evolution of carrier density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Modeling results of TPV. (a-b) Simulated TPV as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature and gate dependence of recovery dynamics at various pump fluences. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TPVM measurements at 21 K on device D2 incorporating a 2.7- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization

    McIver, J.; Hsieh, D.; Steinberg, H.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Gedik, N. Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 96--100

  2. [2]

    Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3

    Braun, L.; Mussler, G.; Hruban, A.; Konczykowski, M.; Schumann, T.; Wolf, M.; M \"u nzenberg, M.; Perfetti, L.; Kampfrath, T. Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nat. Commun 2016, 7, 13259

  3. [3]

    Kastl, C.; Karnetzky, C.; Karl, H.; Holleitner, A. W. Ultrafast helicity control of surface currents in topological insulators with near-unity fidelity. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6617

  4. [4]

    Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator

    Wang, Y.; Steinberg, H.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator. Science 2013, 342, 453--457

  5. [5]

    I.; Kim, P

    Liu, X.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Halperin, B. I.; Kim, P. Quantum Hall drag of exciton condensate in graphene. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 746

  6. [6]

    Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene

    Li, J.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Hone, J.; Dean, C. Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 751

  7. [7]

    G.; Rana, F.; Park, J.; Hone, J.; Wang, F.; et al

    Ju, L.; Wang, L.; Cao, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Louie, S. G.; Rana, F.; Park, J.; Hone, J.; Wang, F.; et al. Tunable excitons in bilayer graphene. Science 2017, 358, 907--910

  8. [8]

    Observation of chiral surface excitons in a topological insulator Bi2Se3

    Kung, H.-H.; Goyal, A.; Maslov, D.; Wang, X.; Lee, A.; Kemper, A.; Cheong, S.-W.; Blumberg, G. Observation of chiral surface excitons in a topological insulator Bi2Se3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2019, 116, 4006--4011

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    E.; Lanzara, A

    Mori, R.; Ciocys, S.; Takasan, K.; Ai, P.; Currier, K.; Morimoto, T.; Moore, J. E.; Lanzara, A. Spin-polarized spatially indirect excitons in a topological insulator. Nature 2023, 614, 249--255

  2. [10]

    S.; Balatsky, A

    Triola, C.; Pertsova, A.; Markiewicz, R. S.; Balatsky, A. V. Excitonic gap formation in pumped Dirac materials. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 205410

  3. [11]

    Pertsova, A.; Balatsky, A. V. Excitonic instability in optically pumped three-dimensional Dirac materials. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 075109

  4. [12]

    Prediction of a topological p + ip excitonic insulator with parity anomaly

    Wang, R.; Erten, O.; Wang, B.; Xing, D. Prediction of a topological p + ip excitonic insulator with parity anomaly. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 210

  5. [13]

    C.; Francia, J

    Hou, Y.; Wang, R.; Xiao, R.; McClintock, L.; Travaglini, H. C.; Francia, J. P.; Fetsch, H.; Erten, O.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Wang, B.; et al. Millimetre-long transport of photogenerated carriers in topological insulators. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5723

  6. [14]

    A.; Yang, S.; Analytis, J

    Sobota, J. A.; Yang, S.; Analytis, J. G.; Chen, Y.; Fisher, I. R.; Kirchmann, P. S.; Shen, Z.-X. Ultrafast Optical Excitation of a Persistent Surface-State Population in the Topological Insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 117403

  7. [15]

    A.; Butch, N.; Syers, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Paglione, J.; Zhao, H

    Kumar, N.; Ruzicka, B. A.; Butch, N.; Syers, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Paglione, J.; Zhao, H. Spatially resolved femtosecond pump-probe study of topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 235306

  8. [16]

    L.; Hou, Y.; Rossi, A.; Yu, D.; Vishik, I

    Gross, A. L.; Hou, Y.; Rossi, A.; Yu, D.; Vishik, I. M. Nanosecond dynamics in intrinsic topological insulator Bi2-xSbxSe3 revealed by time-resolved optical reflectivity. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, L020301

  9. [17]

    D.; Li, J.; He, T.; Sun, X

    Glinka, Y. D.; Li, J.; He, T.; Sun, X. W. Clarifying ultrafast carrier dynamics in ultrathin films of the topological insulator Bi2Se3 using transient absorption spectroscopy. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 1191--1205

  10. [18]

    Transient superdiffusion of energetic carriers in transition metal dichalcogenides visualized by ultrafast pump-probe microscopy

    Zhou, Y.-K.; Li, X.-Z.; Zhou, Q.-N.; Xing, R.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, B.; Fang, H.-H.; Sun, H.-B. Transient superdiffusion of energetic carriers in transition metal dichalcogenides visualized by ultrafast pump-probe microscopy. Ultrafast Sci. 2022, 2022, 0002

  11. [19]

    H.; Kim, S

    Lee, B.; Ishida, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Jo, N. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kwak, I.; Lee, M.-C.; Kim, K.; Kim, J. H.; et al. Ultrafast probes of photovoltage and two-dimensional electron gas in the topological insulator Bi2Te3 by angle-resolved photoemission and terahertz spectroscopy. Phy...

  12. [20]

    Ultrafast Photocurrent Detection in Low-Dimensional Materials

    Zeng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Pan, A.; Wang, X. Ultrafast Photocurrent Detection in Low-Dimensional Materials. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2023, 2300120

  13. [21]

    M.; Ross, J

    Sun, D.; Aivazian, G.; Jones, A. M.; Ross, J. S.; Yao, W.; Cobden, D.; Xu, X. Ultrafast hot-carrier-dominated photocurrent in graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 114

  14. [22]

    G.; Reserbat-Plantey, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tielrooij, K.-J.; Koppens, F

    Massicotte, M.; Schmidt, P.; Vialla, F.; Sch \"a dler, K. G.; Reserbat-Plantey, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tielrooij, K.-J.; Koppens, F. H. Picosecond photoresponse in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 42--46

  15. [23]

    H.; Park, J.-K.; Hong, J

    Son, B. H.; Park, J.-K.; Hong, J. T.; Park, J.-Y.; Lee, S.; Ahn, Y. H. Imaging ultrafast carrier transport in nanoscale field-effect transistors. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11361--11368

  16. [24]

    Yagodkin, D.; Kumar, A.; Ankerhold, E.; Richter, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Gahl, C.; Bolotin, K. I. Probing the formation of dark interlayer excitons via ultrafast photocurrent. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 9212--9218

  17. [25]

    S.; Cava, R

    Xia, Y.; Qian, D.; Hsieh, D.; Wray, L.; Pal, A.; Lin, H.; Bansil, A.; Grauer, D.; Hor, Y. S.; Cava, R. J.; Hasan, M. Z. Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 398--402

  18. [26]

    C.; Peng, H.; Cha, J

    Kong, D.; Randel, J. C.; Peng, H.; Cha, J. J.; Meister, S.; Lai, K.; Chen, Y.; Shen, Z.-X.; Manoharan, H. C.; Cui, Y. Topological insulator nanowires and nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 329--333

  19. [27]

    T.; Shi, S.-F.; Wang, F.; Graham, M

    Vogt, K. T.; Shi, S.-F.; Wang, F.; Graham, M. W. Ultrafast photocurrent and absorption microscopy of few-layer transition metal dichalcogenide devices that isolate rate-limiting dynamics driving fast and efficient photoresponse. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 15195--15204

  20. [28]

    Nonlocal chemical potential modulation in topological insulators enabled by highly mobile trapped charges

    Hou, Y.; Xiao, R.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Yu, D. Nonlocal chemical potential modulation in topological insulators enabled by highly mobile trapped charges. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 3436--3442

  21. [29]

    Scanning photocurrent microscopy in semiconductor nanostructures

    Graham, R.; Yu, D. Scanning photocurrent microscopy in semiconductor nanostructures. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 27, 1330018

  22. [30]

    Electrothermal dynamics of semiconductor nanowires under local carrier modulation

    Fu, D.; Zou, J.; Wang, K.; Zhang, R.; Yu, D.; Wu, J. Electrothermal dynamics of semiconductor nanowires under local carrier modulation. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3809--3815

  23. [31]

    On the use of photocurrent imaging to determine carrier diffusion lengths in nanostructured thin-film field-effect transistors

    Xiao, R.; Hou, Y.; Law, M.; Yu, D. On the use of photocurrent imaging to determine carrier diffusion lengths in nanostructured thin-film field-effect transistors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 18356--18364

  24. [32]

    C.; Abramovitch, D.; Tan, L

    McClintock, L.; Xiao, R.; Hou, Y.; Gibson, C.; Travaglini, H. C.; Abramovitch, D.; Tan, L. Z.; Senger, R. T.; Fu, Y.; Jin, S.; et al. Temperature and gate dependence of carrier diffusion in single crystal methylammonium lead iodide perovskite microstructures. J. Phys. Chem. Le...

  25. [33]

    C.; Senger, R

    McClintock, L.; Song, Z.; Travaglini, H. C.; Senger, R. T.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Htoon, H.; Yarotski, D.; Yu, D. Highly mobile excitons in single crystal methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite microribbons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 3698--3705

  26. [34]

    M.; Zhu, Y.; Travaglini, H

    Wang, B. M.; Zhu, Y.; Travaglini, H. C.; Sun, R.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Hahn, W.; van Benthem, K.; Yu, D. Spatially dispersive helicity-dependent photocurrent in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 nanobelts. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 165405

  27. [35]

    M.; Sun, R.; Song, Z.; Yu, D

    Wang, B. M.; Sun, R.; Song, Z.; Yu, D. Temperature-and gate-tunable helicity-dependent photocurrent in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 nanobelts. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 245305

  28. [36]

    Long-range hot-carrier transport in hybrid perovskites visualized by ultrafast microscopy

    Guo, Z.; Wan, Y.; Yang, M.; Snaider, J.; Zhu, K.; Huang, L. Long-range hot-carrier transport in hybrid perovskites visualized by ultrafast microscopy. Science 2017, 356, 59--62

  29. [37]

    P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Syers, P.; Sushkov, A

    Butch, N. P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Syers, P.; Sushkov, A. B.; Jenkins, G. S.; Drew, H. D.; Paglione, J. Strong surface scattering in ultrahigh-mobility Bi2Se3 topological insulator crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 241301

  30. [38]

    High-Mobility Ambipolar Magnetotransport in Topological Insulator Bi 2 Se 3 Nanoribbons

    Kunakova, G.; Bauch, T.; Palermo, X.; Salvato, M.; Andzane, J.; Erts, D.; Lombardi, F. High-Mobility Ambipolar Magnetotransport in Topological Insulator Bi 2 Se 3 Nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021, 16, 024038

  31. [39]

    Super-diffusion of excited carriers in semiconductors

    Najafi, E.; Ivanov, V.; Zewail, A.; Bernardi, M. Super-diffusion of excited carriers in semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15177

  32. [40]

    P.; France, R

    Yang, Y.; Ostrowski, D. P.; France, R. M.; Zhu, K.; Van De Lagemaat, J.; Luther, J. M.; Beard, M. C. Observation of a hot-phonon bottleneck in lead-iodide perovskites. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 53--59

  33. [41]

    W.; Li, S.; Weeden, S.; Song, Z.; McClintock, L.; Xiao, R.; Senger, R

    Tang, K. W.; Li, S.; Weeden, S.; Song, Z.; McClintock, L.; Xiao, R.; Senger, R. T.; Yu, D. Transport modeling of locally photogenerated excitons in halide perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 3951--3959 mcitethebibliography document

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.