Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Complementary Probes of Warped Extra Dimension: Colliders, Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Phase Transitions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Warped extra-dimension models can produce the entire dark-matter abundance as primordial black holes from the radion's strongly supercooled first-order phase transition, with a stochastic gravitational-wave background and massive graviton…

desk verdict First systematic {rho,N} map of PBH dark matter from the radion FOPT, with transparent benchmarks and honest caveats, but the fPBH=1 window rests on unsettled PBH-collapse physics. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03588 v2 pith:ZGIOP7AA submitted 2025-02-05 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Anish Ghoshal , Eugenio Megias , Germano Nardini , Mariano Quiros This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords warpedextradimensionsradionfirst-orderphasetransitionsupercoolingprimordialblackholesstochasticgravitationalwavebackgrounddarkmattercolliderphenomenology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that warped extra-dimension models solving the gauge hierarchy problem can also solve the dark-matter problem, without adding new stable particles, by turning the radion's first-order phase transition into a source of primordial black holes. It maps the resulting PBH masses, abundances, gravitational-wave signals, and collider signals onto the model's two main parameters: the infrared energy scale $\rho$ and the discrete parameter $N$ (the number of colors in the dual gauge theory). The central result is that, for $N\sim 10$--$50$, the experimentally allowed region where PBHs account for all the dark matter sits at $10\,\mathrm{TeV}\lesssim\rho\lesssim10^4\,\mathrm{TeV}$, requires a tuning of about $10^{-4}$, and is accompanied by a stochastic gravitational-wave background detectable at LISA and the Einstein Telescope, plus massive graviton resonances reachable at HE-LHC and FCC-hh. A lower-scale branch with $\rho$ around $0.05$--$0.5\,\mathrm{GeV}$ would instead contribute to the nanohertz pulsar-timing-array signal and produce $0.1$--$1\,M_\odot$ PBH binaries that LISA, ET, and NGRST could observe. If correct, the mechanism fills a known gap: warped models have no simple stable dark-matter candidate, and this phase transition is already an unavoidable part of their cosmology.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the radion, the modulus of the warped brane separation, whose stabilizing scalar field generates a supercooled first-order phase transition with strength $\alpha\gtrsim10^7$. The analysis runs through three linked identities: the semi-analytic temperature formulas of Eqs. (3.8)--(3.11) for $T_c$, $T_n$, $T_R$, and $T_p$; the exponential PBH collapse probability $P_{\rm coll}\simeq\exp[-a(\beta/H_*)^b(1+\delta_c)^c\,\beta/H_*]$ with $\delta_c\simeq0.45$; and the sound-horizon mass relation $M_{\rm PBH}\simeq3.7\times10^{-8}M_\odot\,(0.5\,\mathrm{TeV}/T_R)^2$. The dimensionless inverse transition duration $\beta/H_*$ regulates everything: it enters the collapse probability exponentially, so $f_{\rm PBH}\simeq1$ requires $\beta/H_*\sim6$--$8$, which is why the allowed region is narrow and the fine-tuning $\Delta\sim10^{-4}$ arises. The SGWB is then fixed by bubble collisions and follows the broken power law of Eq. (5.1) with a high-frequency tail $\propto f^{-2.4}$.

What would settle it

Run a numerical-relativity simulation of a vacuum-dominated first-order phase transition with $\beta/H_*\sim6$--$8$ that includes bubble nucleation, local reheating, and the curvature of late-blooming patches, and read off the actual PBH mass function and abundance; if the resulting $f_{\rm PBH}$ drops below 1 across $10\,\mathrm{TeV}\lesssim\rho\lesssim10^4\,\mathrm{TeV}$ for $N=10$--$50$, the paper's dark-matter claim is refuted. An empirical null combination of no SGWB at LISA/ET, no graviton resonance at FCC-hh, and no PBH microlensing at NGRST in the predicted region would settle the question observationally.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that the radion, the scalar field fixing the brane separation in a warped fifth dimension, naturally undergoes a strongly supercooled first-order phase transition whose false-vacuum patches collapse into primordial black holes. Using two concrete setups — a two-brane Randall-Sundrum-type model for $\rho\gtrsim1$ TeV and a three-brane variant with the Standard Model on an intermediate TeV brane for $\rho\lesssim1$ TeV — they derive semi-analytic expressions for the critical, nucleation, reheating, and percolation temperatures, and from those compute the PBH mass, abundance, and spin, the SGWB peak frequency and amplitude, and the radion and graviton couplings to Standard Model fields. Overlaying current bounds and future sensitivities from PBH evaporation, microlensing, mergers, GW interferometers, pulsar timing arrays, and hadron colliders on the same $\{\rho,N\}$ plane, the paper finds that PBHs can be the whole dark matter only in the window $10\,\mathrm{TeV}\lesssim\rho\lesssim10^4\,\mathrm{TeV}$ for $N\sim10$--$50$, with a tuning $\Delta\sim10^{-4}$; this is the region where future GW observatories and future colliders both have discovery reach. For lower scales near $\rho\sim0.05$--$0.5$ GeV the maximal allowed PBH abundance is far below the dark-matter density, but the associated SGWB can explain the nHz pulsar-timing-array hint and the PBH binaries can be seen by LISA and ET.

Load-bearing premise

The window where PBHs are all the dark matter rests on the external estimate that the probability for a false-vacuum patch to collapse into a PBH is the exponential function in Eq. (4.1), with threshold $\delta_c=0.45$ and a monochromatic PBH mass; if that estimate is wrong, the window and all its correlated signatures move or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PBHs can supply the entire dark-matter abundance in the window $10\,\mathrm{TeV}\lesssim\rho\lesssim10^4\,\mathrm{TeV}$ for $N\sim10$--$50$, with a tuning of order $10^{-4}$.
  • The same window produces an SGWB with $h^2\bar\Omega_{\rm GW}\sim10^{-8}$ peaked at mHz frequencies, detectable at LISA and the Einstein Telescope, and Kaluza-Klein graviton resonances with masses from several TeV to roughly $100$ TeV, accessible to HE-LHC and FCC-hh.
  • For $\rho\simeq0.05$--$0.5$ GeV, the radion FOPT contributes to the nanohertz PTA signal and produces $0.1$--$1\,M_\odot$ PBH binaries whose merger SGWB is in reach of LISA and ET and whose microlensing signatures are in reach of NGRST.
  • The SGWB spectrum from these supercooled transitions is bubble-collision-dominated with a broken power law falling as $f^{-2.4}$ at high frequencies, distinguishing it from sound-wave- or turbulence-dominated phase-transition signals.
  • Current LHC, LVK O3, and BBN/radion-lifetime data already exclude much of the $\{\rho,N\}$ plane, and the surviving $f_{\rm PBH}=1$ region is precisely where future GW, microlensing, and collider searches overlap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential collapse formula is generic, the paper's $\{\rho,N\}$ mapping is a reusable template for any strongly supercooled first-order transition with a light modulus, not just two-brane and three-brane warped geometries.
  • The monochromatic PBH mass assumption likely sharpens the current constraints; an extended mass distribution or the inclusion of curvature from late-blooming patches could widen or shift the $f_{\rm PBH}=1$ window.
  • The paper's observation that fitting the full PTA spectrum would require parameters violating PBH bounds suggests that a joint Bayesian fit of PTA data plus PBH constraints could settle whether the nanohertz hint can come from this model at all.
  • A positive SGWB detection at LISA with no accompanying PBH signal and no graviton resonance at FCC-hh would favor other supercooled-FOPT sources over this specific warped setup, making the complementarity maps a tool for model selection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the supercooled radion phase transition in Randall-Sundrum-type warped extra dimensions, in two setups: a high-energy variant with the SM localized on the IR brane (ρ ≳ 1 TeV) and a low-energy variant with the SM on an intermediate TeV brane (ρ ≲ 1 TeV). It constructs semi-analytic approximations for the critical, nucleation, reheating, and percolation temperatures, calibrated against numerical O(4) bounce solutions, and then uses external PBH-formation estimates (Eqs. 4.1–4.3) to compute PBH masses, abundances, and spins. The same FOPT is used to compute the SGWB spectrum, and current and future PBH, gravitational-wave, and collider constraints are recast on the common {ρ, N} plane. The central quantitative claims are an experimentally allowed f_PBH = 1 window for 10 TeV ≲ ρ ≲ 10^4 TeV with a tuning of order 10^-4, a lower-scale region compatible with the nHz PTA hint, and a correlated set of LISA/ET, NGRST, HE-LHC, and FCC-hh signatures.

Significance. If the central PBH claim holds, the paper provides a concrete and striking connection between the radion FOPT in warped extra dimensions and PBH dark matter, with correlated predictions for gravitational waves and colliders. The paper's strengths are its careful mapping of the FOPT thermodynamics onto the {ρ, N} plane, the semi-analytic temperature formulas checked against numerical bounce solutions at several benchmarks, and the explicit recasting of many current and future constraints into a common parameter space. The paper also states its main caveats clearly, including the evolving status of PBH-formation estimates and the neglect of curvature effects in late-blooming patches. However, the central f_PBH = 1 window rests on collapse-probability formulas that the manuscript itself flags as uncertain, and — more seriously — the printed collapse formula appears internally inconsistent with the benchmark table. The significance of the paper therefore cannot be fully assessed until these load-bearing consistency issues are resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.1)] Read literally, Eq. (4.1) is incompatible with the benchmark table. For P6 (β/H* = 6.5, T_R = 23 TeV), the formula with a = 0.5646, b = 1.266, c = 0.6639, and δ_c = 0.45 gives P_coll ≃ exp(−50.2) ≃ 1.8 × 10^-22, and Eq. (4.3) then yields f_PBH ≃ 1.4 × 10^-9, whereas Table 2 quotes f_PBH = 1. The analogous check for P1 (β/H* = 5.7, T_R = 2.1 × 10^-4 TeV) gives f_PBH ≃ 4 × 10^-9, not the quoted 0.066. Since the f_PBH = 1 window is the paper's central result, the printed formula, the constants, or the benchmark table must be corrected, and the f_PBH = 1 window and tuning should be recomputed from the corrected expression.
  2. [Sec. 4 and footnote 8] The central f_PBH = 1 region rests on the assumption that late-blooming false-vacuum patches evolve independently from the background and collapse with threshold δ_c = 0.45, with curvature K neglected. The paper itself cites Ref. [176] in footnote 8 for the concern that curvature perturbations may be efficiently generated after bubble nucleation begins and that this curvature may modify the dynamics, and it explicitly sets this effect aside. Because P_coll in Eq. (4.1) is exponentially sensitive to β/H*, a moderate change in the collapse criterion can move or close the f_PBH = 1 strip at ρ ~ 10–10^4 TeV. Please either quantify this effect using Refs. [81, 176] and related work, or reformulate the abstract and Sec. 7 claims as contingent on this unresolved assumption rather than as an experimentally allowed window.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.2)–(4.5)] The mapping from the DM-compatible PBH mass window to ρ ∈ [6.6, 2.4 × 10^4] TeV uses a monochromatic mass distribution and sets M_PBH by the sound-horizon mass at reheating. The text acknowledges, immediately after Eq. (4.1) and in footnote 8, that subleading corrections and extended mass distributions are plausible. Because the allowed f_PBH = 1 window is derived from this monochromatic, leading-order identification, a sensitivity estimate — for example, varying the coefficient in Eq. (4.2) by an O(1) factor or using an extended distribution as in Refs. [97, 175] — should be provided before the quantitative 'experimentally allowed mass region' claim is stated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs. Sec. 7] The abstract states 10 TeV ≲ ρ ≲ 10^4 TeV for the f_PBH = 1 region, while Sec. 7 says ρ ∼ 1–1000 TeV; these ranges should be reconciled.
  2. [Fig. 2, caption] The left panel caption says the plane {ρ, M_PBH}, but the text describes the left panel as the plane {f_PBH, M_PBH}; the caption and axis labels should be made consistent.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.6) and subsequent text] The notation β/H* is used in Eq. (3.6) and Table 2, but the text sometimes writes β/H without the star; a consistent notation should be adopted.
  4. [Table 1] The table title contains a formatting typo ('T able 1'), and Table 2's caption could state explicitly that the quoted f_PBH values are the maximal values on the experimental exclusion boundary, not independent model predictions.
  5. [Sec. 1, final paragraph] The statement that 'future improvements should not revolutionize the qualitative conclusions' is stronger than the manuscript's own caveats about the collapse-probability uncertainty; it should be softened or supported by a quantitative variation estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PBH mass and abundance are computed from the model plus external PBH-formation formulas and then compared with observational constraints; parameter choices are bounded scans, not fits to the claimed dark-matter abundance.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs. Given model parameters {rho, N, lambda1}, the paper computes the FOPT temperatures from the bounce action (Eqs. 3.8-3.11, validated against numerical solutions in App. B), then maps them to a PBH collapse probability Pcoll via Eq. (4.1), which is explicitly taken from the independent literature [82, 101], and to a PBH mass via Eq. (4.2), also from the literature. The abundance fPBH in Eq. (4.3) is then compared with external monochromatic-PBH constraints. The claim that PBHs can be all of the dark matter for 10 TeV < rho < 10^4 TeV arises because, in that rho range, Eq. (4.2) places MPBH in the externally allowed window (1.1) while the scan over lambda1 can reach fPBH = 1 without violating constraints. The table caption states that 'for a given set of {N, rho} input, the value of lambda1 is chosen to maximize the PBH abundance experimentally allowed'; this is a bounded parameter scan, not a fit of the model to the target fPBH = 1 result. The quoted tuning Delta in Eq. (4.6) is a logarithmic derivative of fPBH with respect to lambda1, computed after the scan, so it is an output rather than an input. The paper's self-citations, especially Refs. [46, 49, 52] for the warped-space FOPT and SGWB framework, are supporting prior derivations that are independently checkable and are also cross-checked against the numerical bounce solution and the external SGWB fitting formula of Ref. [177]. Footnote 8 explicitly acknowledges that the treatment neglects curvature effects raised in Ref. [176]; that is a stated physical assumption and a possible limitation of the PBH estimate, but it is not a circular step because the paper does not use the target conclusion to justify the formula. No equation is equivalent to its own input, and no fitted parameter is being renamed as a prediction. Therefore no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The paper reuses the RS/Goldberger-Wise framework and external PBH-formation formulas. The main added items are the semi-analytic fit coefficients and the parameter choices (beta/H*, hat m_chi, rho_T) used to maximize and display PBH signals.

free parameters (4)
  • beta/H* (equivalently lambda1) = scanned to maximize fPBH at experimental boundary; e.g., 6.7 at P5
    Controls the FOPT duration and PBH abundance exponentially. The paper fixes it to the minimal value allowed by PBH bounds for each {rho,N}, so the 'predicted' signals are maximal benchmarks, not data fits.
  • Semi-analytic coefficients a_c, a_n, b_n, a_R = 0.9, 8.25e-3, 1, 0.9
    Fitted to numerical O(4) bounce solutions at selected points (rho = 0.1 and 100 TeV, N = 10 and 20) and used across rho = 1e-7 to 1e8 TeV.
  • Radion mass parameter hat m_chi = 0.1 (default), 0.01 (Fig. 7)
    Sets m_chi = hat m_chi rho, controls radion lifetime and BBN bounds. Values are 'natural' choices from Refs. [49,52], not derived.
  • TeV brane scale rho_T = 1 TeV
    Location of the intermediate SM brane in the low-energy setup. The paper says other O(1 TeV) values would work; the choice affects collider and BBN bounds.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Free energies of confined and deconfined phases are Fc = -E0 - pi^2/90 g_c T^4 and Fd = -pi^2/8 N^2 T^4 - pi^2/90 g_d T^4 with g_c = g_d = 106.75 (Eq. 3.1).
    Defines the phase transition thermodynamics. The absolute value of g_eff enters TR and the SGWB amplitude; near the QCD scale for P1/P2 it is inaccurate.
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary N^2 = 16 pi^2 (M5/k)^3 and k/MP = 2 sqrt(2 pi)/N (Eq. 2.4), with perturbativity N >= 5.
    Maps the 5D gravitational model to the holographic 'number of colors' N used throughout.
  • domain assumption Goldberger-Wise stabilization gives the T = 0 potential gap E0 ~ 3 N^2 rho^4 |lambda1|/(8 pi^2) (Eq. 2.5).
    This gap sets Tc and is the source of supercooling; inherited from prior RS-GW literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The O(4)-symmetric bounce dominates, and the thick-wall inspired semi-analytic formulas (Eqs. B.1-B.3) with fitted coefficients reproduce the numerical bounce across the parameter range.
    The coefficients are fitted to a limited set of numerical solutions; extensibility over 15 orders of magnitude in rho is assumed.
  • domain assumption PBH collapse probability Pcoll = exp[-a (beta/H*)^b (1+delta_c)^c beta/H*] (Eq. 4.1) and mass MPBH ~ TR^-2 (Eq. 4.2) from Refs. [82,101] apply to this FOPT.
    External estimates. The paper assumes they hold for warped radion FOPTs and ignores extended mass distributions and curvature effects.
  • ad hoc to paper O(1) density contrasts collapse with threshold delta_c = 0.45; late-blooming false-vacuum patches evolve independently of the background curvature (Sec. 4 and footnote 8).
    Explicit simplification. The paper notes simulations including reheating are missing and curvature effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Reheating is instantaneous after percolation; Hubble rate during nucleation is vacuum dominated.
    Used to derive Tn, TR, and beta/H relations. The paper itself notes a long radion lifetime can jeopardize this in small parameter regions (Sec. 6.2).
  • domain assumption For rho < 1 TeV, the three-brane setup with SM on an intermediate brane applies, and the heavy radion decouples, leaving one light radion FOPT.
    Based on prior multibrane literature (Refs. [117-125]); used to extend the analysis below 1 TeV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complementary Probes of Warped Extra Dimension: Colliders, Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Phase Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZGIOP7AA

@misc{pith2026250203588,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complementary Probes of Warped Extra Dimension: Colliders, Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Phase Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZGIOP7AA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03588}
}
abstract

We study the formation of primordial black holes (PBHs) and stochastic gravitational waves background (SGWB) produced by the supercooled radion phase transition (PT) in warped extra-dimension models solving the gauge hierarchy problem. We first determine how the SGWB and the produced PBH mass and abundance depend on the warped model's infrared energy scale $\rho$, and the number of holographic colors $N$. With this finding, we recast on the plane $\{\rho, N\}$ the current SGWB and PBH constraints, as well as the expected parameter reaches of GW detectors, as LISA and ET, and the gravitational lensing ones, such as NGRST. On the same plane, we also map the collider bounds on massive graviton production, and cosmological bounds on the radion phenomenology. We find that, for $N \sim 10-50$, the considered PT predicts a PBH population mass in the range $M_{\rm PBH}\sim(10^{-1} - 10^{-25}) M_{\odot}$ for $\rho \sim (10^{-4} - 10^{8})\textrm{ TeV}$. In the range $\rho \simeq (0.05 - 0.5)$ GeV, it can explain the recent SGWB hint at nHz frequencies and generate PBH binaries with mass $M_{\rm PBH}\sim(0.1 - 1 ) M_\odot$ detectable at LISA and ET. The experimentally allowed mass region where PBHs can account for the whole dark matter abundance, and are produced with a tuning $\lesssim 10^{-4}$, corresponds to $10$ TeV $\lesssim \rho\lesssim$ $10^4$ TeV. These PBHs can compensate the lack of natural candidates for dark matter in warped extra dimensional models. Such a region represents a great science case where forthcoming and future colliders like HE-LHC and FCC-hh, gravitational-wave observatories and other PBHs probes play a key complementary role.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can the universe be matter-dominated after a supercooled first-order phase transition?

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    After a supercooled first-order phase transition, the scalar field's equation of state is set by the bubble-wall Lorentz factor γ*, and matter domination is delayed until a/a* ≃ γ* in the free-streaming limit.

  2. Numerical simulations of primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order phase transitions

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spherically symmetric numerical relativity shows false-vacuum domains from delayed first-order phase transitions form type B (baby-universe) or type A (direct-collapse) primordial black holes, separated by a robust t_...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

214 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [176]

    M. M. Flores, A. Kusenko and M. Sasaki, Revisiting formation of primordial black holes in a supercooled first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 015005, [ 2402.13341]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 121101, [ 1612.02029]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 061101, [ 1903.02886]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    Abbott et al., Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run , Phys

    KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientificcollaboration, R. Abbott et al., Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 022004, [ 2101.12130]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [4]

    Afzal et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys

    NANOGrav collaboration, A. Afzal et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11, [ 2306.16219]. 35

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III

    EPTA, InPTA:collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50, [ 2306.16214]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [6]

    D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L6, [ 2306.16215]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res

    H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023) 075024, [2306.16216]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 214 references
  1. [8]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys

    NANOGrav collaboration, G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. Lett. 952 (2023) L37, [ 2306.16220]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV

    EPTA, InPTAcollaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe, Astron. Astrophys. 685 (2024) A94, [ 2306.16227]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Weltman et al., Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array , Publ

    A. Weltman et al., Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array , Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 37 (2020) e002, [ 1810.02680]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Garcia-Bellido, H

    J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama and G. White, Exploring the early Universe with Gaia and Theia, JCAP 12 (2021) 023, [ 2104.04778]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Abe et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100), Quantum Sci

    MAGIS-100 collaboration, M. Abe et al., Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100), Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (2021) 044003, [ 2104.02835]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011, [ 1911.11755]

    L. Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , JCAP 05 (2020) 011, [ 1911.11755]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [14]

    AEDGE collaboration, Y. A. El-Neaj et al., AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space , EPJ Quant. Technol. 7 (2020) 6, [ 1908.00802]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron. 51 (2021) 1333–1383, [ 1908.11391]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    LISA collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Luo et al., TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector , Class

    TianQin collaboration, J. Luo et al., TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 035010, [ 1512.02076]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2050075, [ 1807.09495]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105, [ 2006.13545]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105, [ 2006.13545]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435–2446, [ gr-qc/0512039]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

    2010

  15. [22]

    Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035, [ 1907.04833]. 36

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev

    N. Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev. Rel. 24 (2021) 4, [ 2011.12414]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Berlin, D

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. Tito D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn et al., Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavities , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 116011, [2112.11465]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Herman, L

    N. Herman, L. Lehoucq and A. F´ uzfa, Electromagnetic antennas for the resonant detection of the stochastic gravitational wave background , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124009, [ 2203.15668]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Bringmann, V

    T. Bringmann, V. Domcke, E. Fuchs and J. Kopp, High-frequency gravitational wave detection via optical frequency modulation , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) L061303, [ 2304.10579]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    J. R. Valero, J. R. N. Madrid, D. Blas, A. D. Morcillo, I. G. Irastorza, B. Gimeno et al., High-frequency gravitational waves detection with the BabyIAXO haloscopes , 2407.20482

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases , Phys

    E. Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases , Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 272–285

    1984

  22. [29]

    C. J. Hogan, Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 218 (1986) 629–636

    1986

  23. [30]

    Auclair et al., Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev

    LISA Cosmology Working Groupcollaboration, P. Auclair et al., Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 5, [ 2204.05434]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Is there a hot electroweak phase transition at mH ≳ mW ?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2887–2890, [ hep-ph/9605288]

    1996 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Laine and M

    M. Laine and M. Meyer, Standard Model thermodynamics across the electroweak crossover , JCAP 07 (2015) 035, [ 1503.04935]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Bhattacharya et al., QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physical Quark Masses, Phys

    T. Bhattacharya et al., QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physical Quark Masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 082001, [ 1402.5175]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370–3373, [ hep-ph/9905221]

    1999 arXiv

  28. [35]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Modulus stabilization with bulk fields , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4922–4925, [ hep-ph/9907447]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Holography and the electroweak phase transition , JHEP 03 (2002) 051, [ hep-th/0107141]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Randall and G

    L. Randall and G. Servant, Gravitational waves from warped spacetime , JHEP 05 (2007) 054, [hep-ph/0607158]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Kaplan, P

    J. Kaplan, P. C. Schuster and N. Toro, Avoiding an Empty Universe in RS I Models and Large-N Gauge Theories, hep-ph/0609012

    arXiv

  32. [39]

    Nardini, M

    G. Nardini, M. Quir´ os and A. Wulzer,A Confining Strong First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition, JHEP 09 (2007) 077, [ 0706.3388]

    2007 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Hassanain, J

    B. Hassanain, J. March-Russell and M. Schvellinger, Warped Deformed Throats have Faster (Electroweak) Phase Transitions, JHEP 10 (2007) 089, [ 0708.2060]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Konstandin, G

    T. Konstandin, G. Nardini and M. Quir´ os, Gravitational Backreaction Effects on the Holographic Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083513, [ 1007.1468]. 37

    2010 arXiv

  35. [42]

    D. Bunk, J. Hubisz and B. Jain, A Perturbative RS I Cosmological Phase Transition , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 78, [ 1705.00001]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [43]

    B. M. Dillon, B. K. El-Menoufi, S. J. Huber and J. P. Manuel, Rapid holographic phase transition with brane-localized curvature, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086005, [ 1708.02953]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [44]

    von Harling and G

    B. von Harling and G. Servant, QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition, JHEP 01 (2018) 159, [1711.11554]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Baratella, A

    P. Baratella, A. Pomarol and F. Rompineve, The Supercooled Universe, JHEP 03 (2019) 100, [1812.06996]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Meg ´ ıas, G

    E. Meg ´ ıas, G. Nardini and M. Quir´ os,Cosmological Phase Transitions in Warped Space: Gravitational Waves and Collider Signatures , JHEP 09 (2018) 095, [ 1806.04877]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement, JHEP 05 (2020) 086, [ 1910.06238]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Fujikura, Y

    K. Fujikura, Y. Nakai and M. Yamada, A more attractive scheme for radion stabilization and supercooled phase transition, JHEP 02 (2020) 111, [ 1910.07546]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Meg ´ ıas, G

    E. Meg ´ ıas, G. Nardini and M. Quir´ os,Gravitational Imprints from Heavy Kaluza-Klein Resonances, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 055004, [ 2005.04127]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A. L. Cotrone and A. Paredes, Fate of false vacua in holographic first-order phase transitions , JHEP 12 (2020) 200, [ 2008.02579]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension , JHEP 02 (2021) 051, [ 2010.04083]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Meg ´ ıas, G

    E. Meg ´ ıas, G. Nardini and M. Quir´ os,Pulsar timing array stochastic background from light Kaluza-Klein resonances, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 095017, [ 2306.17071]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall, Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology, JHEP 12 (2023) 036, [ 2309.10090]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall, Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool , JHEP 06 (2024) 099, [2401.09633]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Barbosa, S

    S. Barbosa, S. Fichet, E. Meg ´ ıas and M. Quir´ os,Entanglement entropy and thermal phase transitions from curvature singularities , JHEP 04 (2025) 044, [ 2406.02899]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Agrawal, G

    P. Agrawal, G. R. Kane, V. Loladze and M. Reig, Supercooled Confinement, 2504.00199

  50. [57]

    Gherghetta, A

    T. Gherghetta, A. Paul and A. Shkerin, Holographic phase transitions via thermally-assisted tunneling, 2504.12437

  51. [58]

    Konstandin and G

    T. Konstandin and G. Servant, Natural Cold Baryogenesis from Strongly Interacting Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, JCAP 07 (2011) 024, [ 1104.4793]

    2011 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant, Status of electroweak baryogenesis in minimal composite Higgs , JHEP 08 (2023) 012, [ 2212.11953]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. Von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant, Baryon Asymmetry from a Composite Higgs Boson , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 131801, [ 1803.08546]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model , Sov. Astron. 10 (1967) 602. 38

    1967

  55. [62]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152 (1971) 75

    1971

  56. [63]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399–415

    1974

  57. [64]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates , SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 48 (2022) 1, [ 2110.02821]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Bagui et al., Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures , 2310.19857

    LISA Cosmology Working Groupcollaboration, E. Bagui et al., Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures , 2310.19857

    arXiv

  59. [66]

    S. W. Hawking, I. G. Moss and J. M. Stewart, Bubble Collisions in the Very Early Universe , Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2681

    1982

  60. [67]

    Crawford and D

    M. Crawford and D. N. Schramm, Spontaneous Generation of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe , Nature 298 (1982) 538–540

    1982

  61. [68]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki and K. Sato, Abundance of Primordial Holes Produced by Cosmological First Order Phase Transition , Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 1979

    1982

  62. [69]

    S. D. H. Hsu, Black Holes From Extended Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 251 (1990) 343–348

    1990

  63. [70]

    I. G. Moss, Singularity formation from colliding bubbles , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 676–681

    1994

  64. [71]

    M. Y. Khlopov, R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin and A. S. Sakharov, Formation of black holes in first order phase transitions , hep-ph/9807343

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Lewicki and V

    M. Lewicki and V. Vaskonen, On bubble collisions in strongly supercooled phase transitions , Phys. Dark Univ. 30 (2020) 100672, [ 1912.00997]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [73]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black hole production during first-order phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L021303, [ 2106.05637]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura and T. Takahashi, Primordial black holes as a probe of strongly first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137261, [ 2111.13099]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Gross, G

    C. Gross, G. Landini, A. Strumia and D. Teresi, Dark Matter as dark dwarfs and other macroscopic objects: multiverse relics? , JHEP 09 (2021) 033, [ 2105.02840]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [76]

    M. J. Baker, M. Breitbach, J. Kopp and L. Mittnacht, Detailed Calculation of Primordial Black Hole Formation During First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions , 2110.00005

    arXiv

  70. [77]

    Kawana and K.-P

    K. Kawana and K.-P. Xie, Primordial black holes from a cosmic phase transition: The collapse of Fermi-balls, Phys. Lett. B 824 (2022) 136791, [ 2106.00111]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [78]

    S. He, L. Li, Z. Li and S.-J. Wang, Gravitational waves and primordial black hole productions from gluodynamics by holography , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 240411, [2210.14094]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, T. Takahashi and M. Tanaka, Probing first-order electroweak phase transition via primordial black holes in the effective field theory , Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137688, [2211.16225]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Kawana, T

    K. Kawana, T. Kim and P. Lu, PBH formation from overdensities in delayed vacuum transitions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 103531, [ 2212.14037]. 39

    2023 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V. Vaskonen, Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions, JHEP 09 (2023) 092, [ 2305.04924]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Gouttenoire and T

    Y. Gouttenoire and T. Volansky, Primordial black holes from supercooled phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 043514, [ 2305.04942]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Salvio, Supercooling in radiative symmetry breaking: theory extensions, gravitational wave detection and primordial black holes , JCAP 12 (2023) 046, [ 2307.04694]

    A. Salvio, Supercooling in radiative symmetry breaking: theory extensions, gravitational wave detection and primordial black holes , JCAP 12 (2023) 046, [ 2307.04694]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [84]

    W.-Y. Ai, L. Heurtier and T. H. Jung, Primordial black holes from an interrupted phase transition, 2409.02175

  78. [85]

    K. Sato, M. Sasaki, H. Kodama and K.-i. Maeda, Creation of Wormholes by First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum in the Early Universe , Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 (1981) 1443

    1981

  79. [86]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki, K. Sato and K.-i. Maeda, Fate of Wormholes Created by First Order Phase Transition in the Early Universe , Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 (1981) 2052

    1981

  80. [87]

    Maeda, K

    K.-i. Maeda, K. Sato, M. Sasaki and H. Kodama, Creation of De Sitter-schwarzschild Wormholes by a Cosmological First Order Phase Transition , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 98–102

    1982

  81. [88]

    K. Sato, H. Kodama, M. Sasaki and K.-i. Maeda, Multiproduction of Universes by First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 103–107

    1982

  82. [89]

    Ashoorioon, A

    A. Ashoorioon, A. Rostami and J. T. Firouzjaee, Examining the end of inflation with primordial black holes mass distribution and gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 123512, [2012.02817]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [90]

    T. H. Jung and T. Okui, Primordial black holes from bubble collisions during a first-order phase transition, 2110.04271

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    Huang and K.-P

    P. Huang and K.-P. Xie, Primordial black holes from an electroweak phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115033, [ 2201.07243]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Kawana, P

    K. Kawana, P. Lu and K.-P. Xie, First-order phase transition and fate of false vacuum remnants, JCAP 10 (2022) 030, [ 2206.09923]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Kierkla, A

    M. Kierkla, A. Karam and B. Swiezewska, Conformal model for gravitational waves and dark matter: a status update , JHEP 03 (2023) 007, [ 2210.07075]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Kierkla, B

    M. Kierkla, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. van de Vis, Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimensional transmutation meets dimensional reduction , JHEP 02 (2024) 234, [ 2312.12413]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [95]

    T. C. Gehrman, B. Shams Es Haghi, K. Sinha and T. Xu, The primordial black holes that disappeared: connections to dark matter and MHz-GHz gravitational Waves , JCAP 10 (2023) 001, [2304.09194]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Gouttenoire, Primordial black holes from conformal Higgs , Phys

    Y. Gouttenoire, Primordial black holes from conformal Higgs , Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138800, [2311.13640]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Baldes and M

    I. Baldes and M. O. Olea-Romacho, Primordial black holes as dark matter: interferometric tests of phase transition origin , JHEP 01 (2024) 133, [ 2307.11639]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Salvio, Pulsar timing arrays and primordial black holes from a supercooled phase transition , Phys

    A. Salvio, Pulsar timing arrays and primordial black holes from a supercooled phase transition , Phys. Lett. B 852 (2024) 138639, [ 2312.04628]. 40

    2024 arXiv

  92. [99]

    I. K. Banerjee and U. K. Dey, Spinning primordial black holes from first order phase transition, JHEP 07 (2024) 006, [ 2311.03406]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Gon¸ calves, A

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan and Y. Wu, Primordial Black Holes from First-Order Phase Transition in the xSM , 2406.07622

    arXiv

  94. [101]

    Conaci, L

    A. Conaci, L. Delle Rose, P. S. B. Dev and A. Ghoshal, Slaying Axion-Like Particles via Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Supercooled Phase Transition , 2401.09411

  95. [102]

    Cai, Y.-S

    R.-G. Cai, Y.-S. Hao and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black holes and curvature perturbations from false vacuum islands , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 290411, [ 2404.06506]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Arteaga, A

    M. Arteaga, A. Ghoshal and A. Strumia, Gravitational waves and black holes from the phase transition in models of dynamical symmetry breaking , 2409.04545

    arXiv

  97. [104]

    Shibata and M

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki, Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 084002, [ gr-qc/9905064]

    1999 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Musco, J

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller and L. Rezzolla, Computations of primordial black hole formation , Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1405–1424, [ gr-qc/0412063]

    2005 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo and K. Kohri, Threshold of primordial black hole formation , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 084051, [ 1309.4201]

    2013 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations, Phys

    I. Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123524, [ 1809.02127]

    2019 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Musco, V

    I. Musco, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto, Threshold for primordial black holes. II. A simple analytic prescription , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063538, [ 2011.03014]

    2021 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Germani and I

    C. Germani and I. Musco, Abundance of Primordial Black Holes Depends on the Shape of the Inflationary Power Spectrum , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 141302, [ 1805.04087]

    2019 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani and R. K. Sheth, Universal threshold for primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 044022, [ 1907.13311]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Escriv` a and A

    A. Escriv` a and A. E. Romano,Effects of the shape of curvature peaks on the size of primordial black holes , JCAP 05 (2021) 066, [ 2103.03867]

    2021 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Escriv` a, E

    A. Escriv` a, E. Bagui and S. Clesse, Simulations of PBH formation at the QCD epoch and comparison with the GWTC-3 catalog , JCAP 05 (2023) 004, [ 2209.06196]

    2023 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Arganda, A

    E. Arganda, A. Delgado, A. Martin, E. Meg ´ ıas, R. Morales, M. Quir´ os et al.,Drell-Yan bounds on gapped continuum spectra, JHEP 04 (2024) 104, [ 2401.07093]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [114]

    DeWolfe, D

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser and A. Karch, Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 046008, [ hep-th/9909134]

    2000 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Agashe, H

    K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, G. Perez and A. Soni, Warped Gravitons at the LHC and Beyond , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 036006, [ hep-ph/0701186]

    2007 arXiv

  109. [116]

    C.-Y. Chen, H. Davoudiasl and D. Kim, Z with missing energy as a warped graviton signal at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 096007, [ 1403.3399]

    2014 arXiv

  110. [117]

    J. D. Lykken and L. Randall, The Shape of gravity , JHEP 06 (2000) 014, [ hep-th/9908076]. 41

    2000 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Hatanaka, M

    H. Hatanaka, M. Sakamoto, M. Tachibana and K. Takenaga, Many brane extension of the Randall-Sundrum solution , Prog. Theor. Phys. 102 (1999) 1213–1218, [ hep-th/9909076]

    1999 arXiv

  112. [119]

    I. I. Kogan, S. Mouslopoulos, A. Papazoglou, G. G. Ross and J. Santiago, A Three three-brane universe: New phenomenology for the new millennium? , Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 313–328, [hep-ph/9912552]

    2000 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Gregory, V

    R. Gregory, V. A. Rubakov and S. M. Sibiryakov, Opening up extra dimensions at ultra large scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5928–5931, [ hep-th/0002072]

    2000 arXiv

  114. [121]

    I. I. Kogan, S. Mouslopoulos, A. Papazoglou and G. G. Ross, Multi-brane worlds and modification of gravity at large scales , Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 225–249, [ hep-th/0006030]

    2001 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, S. Hong and R. Sundrum, Flavor Universal Resonances and Warped Gravity, JHEP 01 (2017) 016, [ 1608.00526]

    2017 arXiv

  116. [123]

    K. S. Agashe, J. Collins, P. Du, S. Hong, D. Kim and R. K. Mishra, LHC Signals from Cascade Decays of Warped Vector Resonances, JHEP 05 (2017) 078, [ 1612.00047]

    2017 arXiv

  117. [124]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki, Multiple hierarchies from a warped extra dimension , JHEP 02 (2022) 050, [ 2109.10938]

    2022 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Girmohanta, S

    S. Girmohanta, S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki, Multi-brane cosmology, JHEP 07 (2023) 182, [2304.05586]

    2023 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ 1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ 1910.13125]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [127]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, Constraints on primordial black holes , Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (2021) 116902, [ 2002.12778]

    2021 arXiv

  121. [128]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate , J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 043001, [ 2007.10722]

    2021 arXiv

  122. [129]

    A. K. Saha and R. Laha, Sensitivities on nonspinning and spinning primordial black hole dark matter with global 21-cm troughs , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 103026, [ 2112.10794]

    2022 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Laha, Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV γ -Ray Line, Phys

    R. Laha, Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV γ -Ray Line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 251101, [ 1906.09994]

    2019 arXiv

  124. [131]

    A. Ray, R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz and R. Caputo, Near future MeV telescopes can discover asteroid-mass primordial black hole dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023516, [2102.06714]

    2021 arXiv

  125. [132]

    Clark, B

    S. Clark, B. Dutta, Y. Gao, L. E. Strigari and S. Watson, Planck Constraint on Relic Primordial Black Holes , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 083006, [ 1612.07738]

    2017 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Mittal, A

    S. Mittal, A. Ray, G. Kulkarni and B. Dasgupta, Constraining primordial black holes as dark matter using the global 21-cm signal with X-ray heating and excess radio background , JCAP 03 (2022) 030, [ 2107.02190]

    2022 arXiv

  127. [134]

    R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz and T. R. Slatyer, INTEGRAL constraints on primordial black holes and particle dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 123514, [ 2004.00627]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [135]

    Berteaud, F

    J. Berteaud, F. Calore, J. Iguaz, P. D. Serpico and T. Siegert, Strong constraints on primordial black hole dark matter from 16 years of INTEGRAL/SPI observations , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 023030, [ 2202.07483]. 42

    2022 arXiv

  129. [136]

    Boudaud and M

    M. Boudaud and M. Cirelli, Voyager 1 e± Further Constrain Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 041104, [ 1807.03075]

    2019 arXiv

  130. [137]

    DeRocco and P

    W. DeRocco and P. W. Graham, Constraining Primordial Black Hole Abundance with the Galactic 511 keV Line , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 251102, [ 1906.07740]

    2019 arXiv

  131. [138]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 104019, [ 0912.5297]

    2010 arXiv

  132. [139]

    Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron

    H. Niikura et al., Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations, Nature Astron. 3 (2019) 524–534, [ 1701.02151]

    2019 arXiv

  133. [140]

    Tisserand et al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron

    EROS-2 collaboration, P. Tisserand et al., Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds , Astron. Astrophys. 469 (2007) 387–404, [astro-ph/0607207]

    2007 arXiv

  134. [141]

    Oguri, J

    M. Oguri, J. M. Diego, N. Kaiser, P. L. Kelly and T. Broadhurst, Understanding caustic crossings in giant arcs: characteristic scales, event rates, and constraints on compact dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023518, [ 1710.00148]

    2018 arXiv

  135. [142]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi and S. Masaki, Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083503, [1901.07120]

    2019 arXiv

  136. [143]

    Franciolini, I

    G. Franciolini, I. Musco, P. Pani and A. Urbano, From inflation to black hole mergers and back again: Gravitational-wave data-driven constraints on inflationary scenarios with a first-principle model of primordial black holes across the QCD epoch , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 1235...

    2022 arXiv

  137. [144]

    B. J. Kavanagh, D. Gaggero and G. Bertone, Merger rate of a subdominant population of primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 023536, [ 1805.09034]

    2018 arXiv

  138. [145]

    A. Hall, A. D. Gow and C. T. Byrnes, Bayesian analysis of LIGO-Virgo mergers: Primordial vs. astrophysical black hole populations , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123524, [ 2008.13704]

    2020 arXiv

  139. [146]

    K. W. K. Wong, G. Franciolini, V. De Luca, V. Baibhav, E. Berti, P. Pani et al., Constraining the primordial black hole scenario with Bayesian inference and machine learning: the GWTC-2 gravitational wave catalog , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 023026, [ 2011.01865]

    2021 arXiv

  140. [147]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae,Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes, JCAP 03 (2021) 068, [ 2012.02786]

    2021 arXiv

  141. [148]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, P. Pani and A. Riotto, Bayesian Evidence for Both Astrophysical and Primordial Black Holes: Mapping the GWTC-2 Catalog to Third-Generation Detectors , JCAP 05 (2021) 003, [ 2102.03809]

    2021 arXiv

  142. [149]

    Franciolini, V

    G. Franciolini, V. Baibhav, V. De Luca, K. K. Y. Ng, K. W. K. Wong, E. Berti et al., Searching for a subpopulation of primordial black holes in LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave data , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 083526, [ 2105.03349]

    2022 arXiv

  143. [150]

    P. D. Serpico, V. Poulin, D. Inman and K. Kohri, Cosmic microwave background bounds on primordial black holes including dark matter halo accretion , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 023204, [2002.10771]

    2020 arXiv

  144. [151]

    L. Piga, M. Lucca, N. Bellomo, V. Bosch-Ramon, S. Matarrese, A. Raccanelli et al., The effect 43 of outflows on CMB bounds from Primordial Black Hole accretion , JCAP 12 (2022) 016, [2210.14934]

    2022 arXiv

  145. [152]

    DeRocco, E

    W. DeRocco, E. Frangipane, N. Hamer, S. Profumo and N. Smyth, Revealing terrestrial-mass primordial black holes with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023013, [2311.00751]

    2024 arXiv

  146. [153]

    Pujolas, V

    O. Pujolas, V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae,Prospects for probing gravitational waves from primordial black hole binaries , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083521, [ 2107.03379]

    2021 arXiv

  147. [154]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, P. Pani and A. Riotto, The minimum testable abundance of primordial black holes at future gravitational-wave detectors , JCAP 11 (2021) 039, [2106.13769]

    2021 arXiv

  148. [155]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Maharana and F. Muia, Hunt for light primordial black hole dark matter with ultrahigh-frequency gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103520, [ 2205.02153]

    2022 arXiv

  149. [156]

    Martinelli, F

    M. Martinelli, F. Scarcella, N. B. Hogg, B. J. Kavanagh, D. Gaggero and P. Fleury, Dancing in the dark: detecting a population of distant primordial black holes , JCAP 08 (2022) 006, [2205.02639]

    2022 arXiv

  150. [157]

    Franciolini, F

    G. Franciolini, F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, M. Maggiore, P. Pani and A. Riotto, Searching for primordial black holes with the Einstein Telescope: Impact of design and systematics , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043506, [ 2304.03160]

    2023 arXiv

  151. [158]

    Marcoccia, G

    P. Marcoccia, G. Nardini and M. Pieroni, Probing primordial black holes at high redshift with future gravitational wave detectors , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 531 (2024) 4444–4463, [2311.11760]

    2024 arXiv

  152. [159]

    Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs , JCAP 07 (2023) 068, [ 2303.15923]

    M. Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs , JCAP 07 (2023) 068, [ 2303.15923]

    2023 arXiv

  153. [160]

    Marriott-Best, D

    A. Marriott-Best, D. Chowdhury, A. Ghoshal and G. Tasinato, Exploring cosmological gravitational wave backgrounds through the synergy of LISA and ET , 2409.02886

    arXiv

  154. [161]

    P. S. Cole, A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes and S. P. Patil, Primordial black holes from single-field inflation: a fine-tuning audit , JCAP 08 (2023) 031, [ 2304.01997]

    2023 arXiv

  155. [162]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, P. Pani and A. Riotto, The evolution of primordial black holes and their final observable spins , JCAP 04 (2020) 052, [ 2003.02778]

    2020 arXiv

  156. [163]

    Hofmann, E

    F. Hofmann, E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, The final spin from binary black holes in quasi-circular orbits, Astrophys. J. Lett. 825 (2016) L19, [ 1605.01938]

    2016 arXiv

  157. [164]

    Jaraba and J

    S. Jaraba and J. Garcia-Bellido, Black hole induced spins from hyperbolic encounters in dense clusters, Phys. Dark Univ. 34 (2021) 100882, [ 2106.01436]

    2021 arXiv

  158. [165]

    Calz` a, J

    M. Calz` a, J. March-Russell and J. a. G. Rosa, Evaporating Primordial Black Holes, the String Axiverse, and Hot Dark Radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 261003, [ 2110.13602]

    2024 arXiv

  159. [166]

    Calz` a, J

    M. Calz` a, J. a. G. Rosa and F. Serrano, Primordial black hole superradiance and evaporation in the string axiverse , JHEP 05 (2024) 140, [ 2306.09430]

    2024 arXiv

  160. [167]

    J. Yang, N. Xie and F. P. Huang, Implication of nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background on ultralight axion particles , JCAP 11 (2024) 045, [ 2306.17113]. 44

    2024 arXiv

  161. [168]

    Tsukada, T

    L. Tsukada, T. Callister, A. Matas and P. Meyers, First search for a stochastic gravitational-wave background from ultralight bosons , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103015, [1812.09622]

    2019 arXiv

  162. [169]

    Berti, R

    E. Berti, R. Brito, C. F. B. Macedo, G. Raposo and J. L. Rosa, Ultralight boson cloud depletion in binary systems , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104039, [ 1904.03131]

    2019 arXiv

  163. [170]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044026, [ 1004.3558]

    2011 arXiv

  164. [171]

    Bhaumik, A

    N. Bhaumik, A. Ghoshal, R. K. Jain and M. Lewicki, Distinct signatures of spinning PBH domination and evaporation: doubly peaked gravitational waves, dark relics and CMB complementarity, JHEP 05 (2023) 169, [ 2212.00775]

    2023 arXiv

  165. [172]

    Ghoshal, Y

    A. Ghoshal, Y. Gouttenoire, L. Heurtier and P. Simakachorn, Primordial black hole archaeology with gravitational waves from cosmic strings , JHEP 08 (2023) 196, [ 2304.04793]

    2023 arXiv

  166. [173]

    Ferguson, S

    D. Ferguson, S. Ghonge, J. A. Clark, J. Calderon Bustillo, P. Laguna, D. Shoemaker et al., Measuring Spin of the Remnant Black Hole from Maximum Amplitude , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 151101, [ 1905.03756]

    2019 arXiv

  167. [174]

    I. K. Banerjee and T. Harada, Spin of Primordial Black Holes from Broad Power Spectrum: Radiation Dominated Universe , 2409.06494

    arXiv

  168. [175]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V. Vaskonen, Black holes and gravitational waves from slow phase transitions, 2402.04158

    arXiv

  169. [177]

    Caprini, R

    LISA Cosmology Working Groupcollaboration, C. Caprini, R. Jinno, M. Lewicki, E. Madge, M. Merchand, G. Nardini et al., Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation , 2403.03723

    arXiv

  170. [178]

    Akita and M

    K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling , JCAP 08 (2020) 012, [ 2005.07047]

    2020 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Froustey, C

    J. Froustey, C. Pitrou and M. C. Volpe, Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis, JCAP 12 (2020) 015, [ 2008.01074]

    2020 arXiv

  172. [180]

    J. J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, P. F. De Salas, M. Drewes, S. Gariazzo, S. Pastor et al., Towards a precision calculation of Neff in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED , JCAP 04 (2021) 073, [ 2012.02726]

    2021 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, R. L. Workman et al., Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    2022

  174. [182]

    Abazajian et al., CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astrophys

    CMB-S4 collaboration, K. Abazajian et al., CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astrophys. J. 926 (2022) 54, [ 2008.12619]

    2022 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Abazajian et al., Snowmass 2021 CMB-S4 White Paper , 2203.08024

    CMB-S4 collaboration, K. Abazajian et al., Snowmass 2021 CMB-S4 White Paper , 2203.08024

    2021 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Sehgal et al., CMB-HD: An Ultra-Deep, High-Resolution Millimeter-Wave Survey Over Half the Sky , 1906.10134

    N. Sehgal et al., CMB-HD: An Ultra-Deep, High-Resolution Millimeter-Wave Survey Over Half the Sky , 1906.10134

    1906 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Aiola et al., Snowmass2021 CMB-HD White Paper , 2203.05728

    CMB-HD collaboration, S. Aiola et al., Snowmass2021 CMB-HD White Paper , 2203.05728. 45

    arXiv

  178. [186]

    Agazie et al., Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys

    International Pulsar Timing Arraycollaboration, G. Agazie et al., Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 105, [ 2309.00693]

    2024 arXiv

  179. [187]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, T. Takahashi, M. Tanaka and C.-M. Yoo, Super-critical primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order electroweak phase transition , 2501.11040

    arXiv

  180. [188]

    Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ 2002.04615]

    K. Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097, [ 2002.04615]

    2021 arXiv

  181. [189]

    B.P.Abbott et al

    V. B.P.Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Advanced ligo, advanced virgo and kagra observing run plans , 2019

    2019

  182. [190]

    Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , Class

    S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, [ 1012.0908]

    2011 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Badurina, O

    L. Badurina, O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, C. McCabe and V. Vaskonen, Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter , Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380 (2021) 20210060, [ 2108.02468]

    2021 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044011, [ 1101.3940]

    2011 arXiv

  185. [193]

    C. J. Moore, R. H. Cole and C. P. L. Berry, Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 015014, [ 1408.0740]

    2015 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Gwplotter

    C. J. Moore, R. H. Cole and C. P. L. Berry, “Gwplotter.”

  187. [195]

    Badger et al., Probing early Universe supercooled phase transitions with gravitational wave data, Phys

    C. Badger et al., Probing early Universe supercooled phase transitions with gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 023511, [ 2209.14707]

    2023 arXiv

  188. [196]

    Gowling, M

    C. Gowling, M. Hindmarsh, D. C. Hooper and J. Torrado, Reconstructing physical parameters from template gravitational wave spectra at LISA: first order phase transitions , JCAP 04 (2023) 061, [ 2209.13551]

    2023 arXiv

  189. [197]

    Hindmarsh, D

    M. Hindmarsh, D. C. Hooper, T. Minkkinen and D. J. Weir, Recovering a phase transition signal in simulated LISA data with a modulated galactic foreground , 2406.04894

    arXiv

  190. [198]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser and G. D. Kribs, Radion dynamics and electroweak physics , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 065002, [ hep-th/0008151]

    2001 arXiv

  191. [199]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, A. L. Maroto and H. Villarrubia-Rojo, Constraints on hidden gravitons from fifth-force experiments and stellar energy loss , JHEP 09 (2017) 104, [ 1706.07818]

    2017 arXiv

  192. [200]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, R. L. Delgado and H. Villarrubia-Rojo, LHC constraints on hidden gravitons, JHEP 01 (2022) 129, [ 2108.00930]

    2022 arXiv

  193. [201]

    Aad et al., Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in the b¯bb¯b final state using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons in the b¯bb¯b final state using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 092002, [ 2202.07288]

    2022 arXiv

  194. [202]

    Aad et al., Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model , 2403.09292

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model , 2403.09292

    arXiv

  195. [203]

    Helsens, D

    C. Helsens, D. Jamin, M. L. Mangano, T. G. Rizzo and M. Selvaggi, Heavy resonances at energy-frontier hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 569, [ 1902.11217]. 46

    2019 arXiv

  196. [204]

    R. M. Harris, E. G. Guler and Y. Guler, Sensitivity to Dijet Resonances at Proton-Proton Colliders, in Snowmass 2021 , 2, 2022. 2202.03389

    2021 arXiv

  197. [205]

    Aad et al., Search for resonances decaying into photon pairs in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for resonances decaying into photon pairs in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136651, [2102.13405]

    2021 arXiv

  198. [206]

    M. G. Folgado, A. Donini and N. Rius, Gravity-mediated Scalar Dark Matter in Warped Extra-Dimensions, 1907.04340

    1907 arXiv

  199. [207]

    J. F. Gunion, M. Toharia and J. D. Wells, Precision electroweak data and the mixed Radion-Higgs sector of warped extra dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 585 (2004) 295–306, [hep-ph/0311219]

    2004 arXiv

  200. [208]

    Koutroulis, E

    F. Koutroulis, E. Meg ´ ıas, S. Pokorski and M. Quir´ os,Dark branes for dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 055015, [ 2403.06276]

    2024 arXiv

  201. [209]

    Abu-Ajamieh, J

    F. Abu-Ajamieh, J. S. Lee and J. Terning, The Light Radion Window , JHEP 10 (2018) 050, [1711.02697]

    2018 arXiv

  202. [210]

    Panico, E

    G. Panico, E. Ponton, J. Santiago and M. Serone, Dark Matter and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Models with Warped Extra Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 115012, [0801.1645]

    2008 arXiv

  203. [211]

    Carena, A

    M. Carena, A. D. Medina, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, Gauge-Higgs Unification, Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Warped Extra Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 096010, [0901.0609]

    2009 arXiv

  204. [212]

    Meg ´ ıas, G

    E. Meg ´ ıas, G. Nardini and M. Quir´ os,Radion dynamics, heavy Kaluza–Klein resonances and gravitational waves, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (2022) 2240023, [ 2103.02705]

    2022 arXiv

  205. [213]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J. M. No, On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal , JCAP 04 (2019) 003, [ 1809.08242]

    2019 arXiv

  206. [214]

    Lewicki, O

    M. Lewicki, O. Pujol` as and V. Vaskonen,Escape from supercooling with or without bubbles: gravitational wave signatures , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 857, [ 2106.09706]. 47

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.