Polarons and Exciton-Polarons in Two-Dimensional Polar Materials

A. Kudlis; I. V. Tokatly; V. Shahnazaryan

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Polarons and Exciton-Polarons in Two-Dimensional Polar Materials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A macroscopic theory shows two polarizabilities govern polaron and exciton-polaron physics in 2D polar monolayers.

desk verdict Solid macroscopic derivation of 2D LO phonons and LLP polaron results; the exciton-polaron binding energies are provisional because the authors explicitly drop a coupling between the relative momentum and the phonon field. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03657 v2 pith:7KS7GFSN submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

V. Shahnazaryan , A. Kudlis , I. V. Tokatly This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords polaronsexciton-polaronstwo-dimensionalpolarmaterialsLOphonondispersionLyddane-Sachs-TellerrelationLee-Low-PinesvariationalmethodKeldysh-Rytovapotentialscreeningofexcitons

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that polaronic physics in atomically thin polar crystals is fixed by a macroscopic, parameter-free theory: the LO phonon dispersion, electron-phonon coupling, polaron binding energies, and the phonon-dressed electron-hole potential all follow from the monolayer's low- and high-frequency 2D polarizabilities. In 2D the LO mode is dispersive and degenerate with the TO mode at zero momentum, a 2D analog of the Lyddane-Sachs-Teller relation. Using the Lee-Low-Pines variational method, the authors predict polaron binding energies and effective masses for h-BN, GaN, AlN, and several transition-metal dichalcogenides that differ strongly from 3D behavior and from earlier Landau-Pekar estimates. A phonon-dressed electron-hole potential is then derived, which interpolates between high-frequency and static screening and substantially modifies exciton binding energies. If correct, the theory gives a unified framework for interpreting optical and transport experiments in 2D polar materials without fitted electron-phonon parameters.

What carries the argument

The central object is a 2D Lagrangian density for the polar monolayer, whose potential energy is fixed by symmetry as W2D = (ωt²/2)ξ² − γξ·E − (α∞/2)E², with γ = ωt√(α0 − α∞). Coupling this to the 3D Poisson equation yields the LO phonon dispersion and the electron-phonon coupling Vk, so all phonon physics is expressed through the screening lengths r∞ = α∞/(2ε0) and r0 = α0/(2ε0). The polaron problem is then treated with the Lee-Low-Pines intermediate-coupling variational method, and the exciton-polaron problem with a generalization where the phonon displacement field Fk(r) depends on the relative electron-hole coordinate. This machinery converts the electron-phonon problem into an effective one-body potential whose strength is controlled by the ratio σ0 = r0/r∞ and by the polaron oscillator scales.

What would settle it

A direct test is to solve the full variational problem without ignoring the Fk–ψX mixing that is dropped after Eq. (14) and compare the resulting exciton-polaron binding energies with those in Table I; if, for example, the HfSe2 value of 306.9 meV shifts by more than a few percent, the effective potential Eq. (16) is not quantitatively reliable. A complementary test would be a diagrammatic Monte Carlo simulation of the Hamiltonian of Eq. (5) to check the LLP polaron binding energies and mass renomalizations directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the effective electron-phonon Hamiltonian for a 2D polar monolayer is parametrized solely by two experimentally accessible macroscopic quantities, the 2D polarizabilities at low and high frequency, α0 and α∞. From these it derives the LO phonon dispersion ωl,k² = ωt² (ε + r0k)/(ε + r∞k), the Fröhlich coupling amplitude Vk, and, through a Lee-Low-Pines variational treatment, polaron binding energies and mass renormalizations. For excitons it derives an effective electron-hole potential Veff(r) dressed by LO phonons, which reduces to the Keldysh-Rytova potential with high-frequency screening at short range and static screening at large range. The resulting polaron and exciton-polaron binding energies for a set of representative 2D crystals show that 2D screening produces nonlinear coupling effects and binding-energy shifts that have no 3D counterpart.

Load-bearing premise

The exciton-polaron binding-energy prediction depends on treating the phonon displacement field and the exciton wave function as independent, although the relative-momentum operator couples them; the paper explicitly says this mixing is ignored for simplicity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The LO phonon dispersion in a free-standing polar monolayer is nonflat and has no LO-TO splitting at zero momentum, so it can be measured directly and used to extract the 2D polarizabilities.
Unlike 3D LLP polarons, 2D polaron binding energies and mass renormalizations grow nonlinearly with the ionic polarizability contrast, so weak- and strong-coupling materials cannot be described by a single coupling constant.
The phonon-dressed electron-hole potential interpolates between high-frequency and static screening, meaning exciton binding energies in 2D polar materials lie between the bare and statically screened values and depend strongly on the LO phonon dispersion.
For materials such as h-BN, GaN, AlN, HfSe2, HfS2, and ZrS2, the theory predicts specific polaron and exciton-polaron binding energies from literature polarizabilities and band masses, with no fitted electron-phonon coupling constant.
The framework can be extended to layered or substrate-supported 2D systems by changing the surrounding dielectric constant ε, providing a route to tune polaronic effects through the environment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because only r0 and r∞ enter the theory, it could be used as a rapid screening tool to estimate polaron and exciton-polaron effects in newly synthesized 2D polar materials before expensive ab initio calculations.
The predicted interpolation of the effective potential suggests that changing the dielectric environment (for example via encapsulation or substrate choice) should systematically shift exciton binding energies, a testable consequence not worked out quantitatively in the paper.
The strong dependence of polaron energies on the full LO dispersion implies that nonlocal screening corrections should also affect other phonon-mediated phenomena in 2D, such as superconductivity, hot-carrier relaxation, and phonon-limited mobilities.
The paper's explicit neglect of the coupling between the relative-momentum operator and the phonon displacement field marks the main place where a more complete variational or numerical treatment could change the predicted exciton-polaron binding energies.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

My read: the genuinely new and valuable part is the macroscopic derivation of the 2D LO phonon dispersion and electron-phonon coupling starting from a 2D Lagrangian with only α0, α∞, and ωt as inputs. Equation (4) and the coupling (6) reproduce Sohier et al. and the hBN experiment, which is a good sanity check. The LLP polaron calculation with the full 2D dispersion is standard and yields binding energies that differ sharply from the Landau–Pekar results of Sio and Giustino; the authors show the difference comes from the phonon dispersion, and their Landau–Pekar limit reproduces Ref. [43]. That part is internally consistent and, as far as I can tell, correct. The analytic approximate form for the polaron energy is handy, and the material table is useful.

The soft spot is the exciton-polaron section, and it is real. After Eq. (14) the authors say "for simplicity, we ignore this mixing" between the relative momentum p and the displacement field F_k(r), then minimize δW_X/δF_k=0, and finally put the renormalized reduced mass μ* into Eq. (15) on the authority of footnote [64]. The stress-test note is right: in the full transformed Hamiltonian, SM Eq. (S121), the neglected p·∇F_k terms are of the same order as the retained |∇F_k|^2 terms at the relevant momenta, so the effective potential (16) and the exciton-polaron binding energies in Table I are uncontrolled at the tens-of-meV level. The authors disclose the approximation, but for HfSe2 the mass renormalization is large enough that μ*/μ is several, and Eq. (15) is no longer a variational upper bound. This does not sink the paper—the phonon and single-polaron results stand—but the exciton-polaron numbers should be treated as preliminary. A coupled variational treatment along the lines of Kane, or a numerical benchmark, would settle it.

Citation pattern is fine; the use of the Keldysh–Rytova potential from Ref. [52] is not circular, and the comparison to Ref. [43] is handled fairly.

Who gets value: anyone working on 2D polar semiconductors, polarons, or exciton-phonon effects. The polaron framework and effective potential are worth having even if Table I's exciton column needs rechecking. I'd send it to peer review; a good referee will push on the exciton-polaron variational treatment, but the core material is solid.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a macroscopic continuum theory of long-wavelength optical phonons and electron-phonon coupling in a polar monolayer. Starting from a 2D Lagrangian with a mass-weighted displacement field and electrostatics of the environment, it derives the LO-phonon dispersion (Eq. (4)), the Fröhlich coupling amplitude (Eq. (6)), and the LLP polaron energy and mass-renormalization formulas (Eqs. (7)-(9)). It then extends the LLP shift to an exciton, obtaining an effective electron-hole interaction (Eq. (16)) and computing polaron and exciton-polaron binding energies for hBN, GaN, AlN, HfSe2, HfS2, and ZrS2 (Table I). The stated goal is a framework parameterized only by macroscopic polarizabilities, the TO phonon energy, and effective masses, with the LO dispersion checked against independent DFT and experiment.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the paper provides a simple macroscopic route to LO-phonon dispersion and polaron physics in 2D polar materials without fitted electron-phonon coupling constants. The agreement of Eq. (4) with independent DFT and the experiment of Ref. [56] is a genuine strength, and the LLP treatment of the single polaron is transparent, standard, and explicitly acknowledged to be variational. The analytic error analysis for the simplified polaron integrals (Fig. S1) also strengthens the presentation. The exciton-polaron part would give a useful 2D analogue of the Pollmann-Büttner potential. However, the quantitative exciton-polaron predictions in Table I rest on approximations that are acknowledged in the text but not quantitatively controlled, so the significance of the paper as it stands hinges on whether those approximations can be validated.

major comments (3)

[Exciton-polaron, Eq. (15) and SM Sec. V] The insertion of the polaron-renormalized reduced mass μ* in Eq. (15) is not derived. The variational calculation in SM Sec. V minimizes the functional W_X with the bare kinetic operator p̂²/(2μ), and only after that minimization is the kinetic term replaced by p̂²/(2μ*), with footnote [64] referring to the 3D treatment of Ref. [19]. This substitution is numerically significant: for HfSe2, Table I gives m_e/m_e* = 0.18 and m_h/m_h* = 0.23, so μ* is several times μ. Once μ* is inserted, Eq. (15) is no longer a variational upper bound, and the exciton-polaron binding energies in Table I are therefore uncontrolled at the level of the claimed quantitative differences. A derivation of this mass renormalization within the 2D model, or a coupled variational calculation that produces it, is required before Table I can be relied upon.
[Main text after Eq. (14) and SM Eqs. (S121)-(S133)] The minimization of W_X with respect to F_k(r) neglects the coupling between the relative momentum operator p̂ and the phonon displacement field. The full transformed Hamiltonian in SM Eq. (S121) contains terms of the form (ℏ/iμ)(â_k ∇F_k^* - â_k^† ∇F_k)·(p̂ + μj), and these terms are not included in the functional W_X minimized in Eq. (S133). For the ansatz F_k = A_k e^{-i m_h k·r/M} - B_k e^{i m_e k·r/M}, ∇F_k ~ i k F_k, so the omitted term is of the same order as the retained |∇F_k|² term when the relevant phonon wavevectors are comparable to the inverse exciton size. The manuscript honestly states that this mixing is ignored, but it provides no estimate of the resulting error. Since the effective potential Eq. (16) and the Table I exciton-polaron binding energies come from this uncoupled minimization, their quantitative accuracy is not established. A coupled variational treatment, or at least an order-of-magnitude estimate of the dropped terms, is needed.
[Table I and Eq. (16)] The numerical exciton-polaron results in Table I should state explicitly whether they are obtained with the approximate potential Eq. (16) or with the exact effective potential in SM Sec. V. The approximate potential is derived under the assumption σ̃²_{e,t}, σ̃²_{h,t} < 1, and some entries (notably HfSe2, for which σ0 ≃ 5.1 and the relevant σ̃² may not be extremely small) lie near the boundary of that regime. Providing the error analysis analogous to Fig. S1 for the exciton-polaron potential would make the accuracy of the table transparent.

minor comments (5)

[SM, after Eq. (S130)] The sentence 'where ψX = 0 is the exciton wave function' appears to contain a typo and should read 'where ψ_X is the exciton wave function'.
[Table I] The entries in the mass-ratio columns are given as pairs separated by a slash with no explanation of what the two numbers represent; please clarify this notation in the caption.
[Eq. (10) and SM Sec. IV B] The approximate analytic form for the polaron binding energy, Eq. (10), is stated to be accurate to a few percent, but the main text should state explicitly whether Table I uses Eq. (10) or the full integrals, and should quote the worst-case error for the materials listed.
[Conclusion] The statement that Eq. (4) 'perfectly agrees' with first-principles calculations and experiments is stronger than what is demonstrated in the manuscript, which shows one representative material (hBN) in Fig. 1(b); consider softening the wording or displaying additional comparisons.
[After Eq. (6)] The length scale r_i,t is introduced after the parameters σ_{i,t} are used; defining r_i,t immediately before its use would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation is self-contained; no circular reduction found.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is not circular. The LO phonon dispersion Eq. (4) and the electron-phonon coupling Eq. (6) are derived from a macroscopic Lagrangian whose coefficients (omega_t, alpha_0, alpha_inf) are external inputs, and the resulting dispersion is checked against independent first-principles and experimental results [53,56]. The polaron binding energies and effective masses in Table I follow from a standard LLP variational calculation, with no parameter fitted to the predicted binding energies. The exciton-polaron effective potential Eq. (16) is obtained by minimizing the phonon-displacement functional in SM Sec. V; the admitted neglect of the coupling between the relative momentum and the displacement field, and the insertion of the renormalized mass mu* in Eq. (15) on the authority of Ref. [19], are uncontrolled approximations that affect accuracy, but they do not assume the target binding energies or reduce the prediction to its inputs. The only self-citation, the Keldysh-Rytova potential from Ref. [52] (coauthored by one of the present authors), is a published parameter-free external result used as an ingredient, not as the conclusion, and therefore does not constitute circularity. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to a target result, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external material parameters (r0, r_inf, hbar omega_t, and the bare masses) and on standard variational approximations. No free parameters are fitted in this paper. The main cost is the uncontrolled approximation in the exciton sector and the lack of uncertainty quantification.

free parameters (4)

r0 (static 2D screening length) = 1.076 nm (h-BN), ranging up to 21.75 nm (HfSe2)
Taken from experimental and first-principles data in Refs. [43,53]; controls the low-frequency screening and enters the LO dispersion, the coupling, and all binding energies.
r_inf (high-frequency 2D screening length) = 0.780 nm (h-BN), ranging down to 0.466 nm (AlN)
Taken from Ref. [43] as eps_inf d/2; sets the energy unit E0 and the bare Keldysh-Rytova potential.
hbar omega_t (TO phonon energy) = 172.3 meV (h-BN); 11.1 to 74.15 meV across materials
External input from Refs. [53,58-62]; sets the phonon frequency scale and the polaron length scale r_i,t.
bare effective masses me, mh = not tabulated; from Ref. [43]
Inputs needed for sigma_i,t and the exciton reduced mass; their values are not listed in the paper, which hampers independent numerical reproduction.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The monolayer is an ideal zero-thickness polarizable sheet with a local 2D polarizability, described by Lagrangian density Eqs. (1)-(2).
Underlies the derivation of the dispersion and electron-phonon coupling; finite thickness or nonlocal response could alter the results.
domain assumption The potential energy W_2D has the symmetry-fixed form omega_t^2 xi^2/2 - gamma xi.E - alpha_inf E^2/2, with gamma chosen so the static polarizability is alpha0.
SM Eq. S2; this is the 2D analogue of the classical 3D Born-Huang expansion.
domain assumption The layer is isotropic for explicit calculations.
Footnote 55; anisotropy can be relaxed but all numerical results assume isotropy.
standard math Polaron and exciton states are described by the LLP coherent-state variational ansatz, and the resulting energies are upper bounds.
Refs. [6,19]; standard variational method, but the approximation error is uncontrolled in strong coupling.
ad hoc to paper For the exciton, the coupling between phonon displacement F_k(r) and exciton wave function psi_X is neglected, and the renormalized mass mu* is inserted by hand.
Main text after Eq. (14) and footnote 64; the authors state the mixing is ignored and the mass renormalization "naturally emerges" elsewhere.
ad hoc to paper The ratio sqrt((1+x)/(1+sigma0 x)) is approximated by 1/sqrt(sigma0) in the polaron and exciton integrals.
Used in Eqs. (10) and (16) and in SM Sec. V; the authors report a few percent error in realistic cases, but the regime condition sigma_tilde^2 < 1 may fail for some materials.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarons and Exciton-Polarons in Two-Dimensional Polar Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KS7GFSN

@misc{pith2026250203657,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarons and Exciton-Polarons in Two-Dimensional Polar Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KS7GFSN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03657}
}

read the original abstract

We propose a macroscopic theory of optical phonons, Fr{\"o}hlich polarons, and exciton-polarons in two-dimensional (2D) polar crystalline monolayers. Our theory extends the classical macroscopic formulation of the electron-phonon problem in three-dimensional (3D) polar crystals to the new generation of 2D materials. Similarly to the 3D case, in our approach, the effective electron-phonon Hamiltonian is parametrized solely in terms of macroscopic experimentally accessible quantities -- 2D polarizabilities of the monolayer at low and high frequencies. We derive the dispersion of long wave length longitudinal optical (LO) phonons, which can be viewed as a 2D form of the Lyddane-Sachs-Teller relation, and study the formation of 2D Fr{\"o}hlich polarons by adopting the intermediate coupling approximation. Finally, we apply this approach to excitons in polar 2D crystals and derive an effective potential of the electron-hole interaction dressed by LO phonons. Due to a specific dispersion of LO phonons, polarons and exciton-polarons in 2D materials exhibit unique features not found in their 3D counterparts. As an illustration, the polaron and exciton-polaron binding energies are computed for a representative set of 2D polar crystals, demonstrating the interplay between dimensionality, polarizability of materials, and electron-phonon coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03657 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. (a) Schematic picture of a 2D polar crystal layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Effective potential of electron-hole interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Map of 2D materials illustrating the relation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Polarons in two-dimensional polar materials: All-coupling variational theory
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A Feynman path-integral variational theory is generalized to two-dimensional polar monolayers, yielding all-coupling polaron energies and masses controlled by one effective Fröhlich constant, αm.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[43]

W. H. Sio and F. Giustino, Polarons in two-dimensional atomic crystals, Nature Physics19, 629 (2023)

2023
[64]

Such renormalization of the reduced mass naturally emerges in a more accurate treatment of the variational problem [19]

work page
[52]

Cudazzo, I

P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 085406 (2011)

2011
[56]

J. Li, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Tao, W. Zhong, Z. Su, S. Xue, G. Miao, W. Wang, H. Peng, J. Guo, and X. Zhu, Observation of the nonanalytic behavior of opti- cal phonons in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-46229-4 (2024)

doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46229-4 2024
[19]

E. O. Kane, Pollmann-büttner variational method for ex- citonic polarons, Physical Review B18, 6849 (1978)

1978
[1]

159 (Springer, 2010)

A.S.AlexandrovandJ.T.Devreese, Advances in polaron physics, Vol. 159 (Springer, 2010)

2010
[2]

L. D. Landau, Electron motion in crystal lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3, 664 (1933)

1933
[3]

S. I. Pekar, Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz16, 341 (1946)

1946

Show all 66 references

[4]

L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, The effective mass of the polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz18, 419 (1948)

1948
[5]

Fröhlich, H

H. Fröhlich, H. Pelzer, and S. Zienau, Xx. properties of slow electrons in polar materials, The London, Edin- burgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 221 (1950)

1950
[6]

T. Lee, F. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow elec- trons in a polar crystal, Physical Review90, 297 (1953)

1953
[7]

R. P. Feynman, Slow electrons in a polar crystal, Physical Review 97, 660 (1955)

1955
[8]

J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov, Fröhlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments, Reports on Progress in Physics 72, 066501 (2009)

2009
[9]

Franchini, M

C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Polarons in materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 560 (2021)

2021
[10]

N. V. Prokof’ev and B. V. Svistunov, Polaron problem by diagrammatic quantum monte carlo, Physical review letters 81, 2514 (1998)

1998
[11]

T. Hahn, S. Klimin, J. Tempere, J. T. Devreese, and C. Franchini, Diagrammatic monte carlo study of fröhlich polaron dispersion in two and three dimensions, Physical Review B 97, 134305 (2018)

2018
[12]

Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

2017
[13]

W. H. Sio, C. Verdi, S. Poncé, and F. Giustino, Polarons from first principles, without supercells, Physical Review Letters 122, 246403 (2019). 6

2019
[14]

W. H. Sio, C. Verdi, S. Poncé, and F. Giustino, Ab initio theory of polarons: Formalism and applications, Physical Review B 99, 235139 (2019)

2019
[15]

Haken, Die theorie des exzitons im festen körper, Fortschritte der Physik6, 271 (1958)

H. Haken, Die theorie des exzitons im festen körper, Fortschritte der Physik6, 271 (1958)

1958
[16]

Mahanti and C

S. Mahanti and C. Varma, Effective electron-hole inter- actions in polar semiconductors, Physical Review B 6, 2209 (1972)

1972
[17]

Bajaj, Effect of electron-phonon interaction on the binding energy of a wannier exciton in a polarizable medium, Solid State Communications15, 1221 (1974)

K. Bajaj, Effect of electron-phonon interaction on the binding energy of a wannier exciton in a polarizable medium, Solid State Communications15, 1221 (1974)

1974
[18]

Pollmann and H

J. Pollmann and H. Büttner, Effective hamiltonians and bindings energies of wannier excitons in polar semicon- ductors, Physical Review B16, 4480 (1977)

1977
[20]

Baranowski and P

M. Baranowski and P. Plochocka, Excitons in metal- halide perovskites, Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903659 (2020)

2020
[21]

A. M. Soufiani, F. Huang, P. Reece, R. Sheng, A. Ho- Baillie, and M. A. Green, Polaronic exciton binding en- ergy in iodide and bromide organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites, Applied Physics Letters107 (2015)

2015
[22]

Menéndez-Proupin, C

E. Menéndez-Proupin, C. L. Beltrán Ríos, and P. Wah- nón, Nonhydrogenic exciton spectrum in perovskite ch3nh3pbi3, physica status solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters 9, 559 (2015)

2015
[23]

M. R. Filip, J. B. Haber, and J. B. Neaton, Phonon screening of excitons in semiconductors: halide per- ovskites and beyond, Physical review letters127, 067401 (2021)

2021
[24]

B. Wu, W. Ning, Q. Xu, M. Manjappa, M. Feng, S. Ye, J. Fu, S. Lie, T. Yin, F. Wang, et al. , Strong self- trapping by deformation potential limits photovoltaic performance in bismuth double perovskite, Science Ad- vances 7, eabd3160 (2021)

2021
[25]

M. A. Masharin, V. A. Shahnazaryan, F. A. Benimet- skiy, D. N. Krizhanovskii, I. A. Shelykh, I. V. Iorsh, S. V. Makarov, and A. K. Samusev, Polaron-enhanced polari- ton nonlinearity in lead halide perovskites, Nano Letters 22, 9092 (2022)

2022
[26]

M. A. Masharin, V. A. Shahnazaryan, I. V. Iorsh, S. V. Makarov, A. K. Samusev, and I. A. Shelykh, Room- temperature polaron-mediated polariton nonlinearity in mapbbr3 perovskites, ACS Photonics10, 691 (2023)

2023
[27]

Baranowski, A

M. Baranowski, A. Nowok, K. Galkowski, M. Dyksik, A. Surrente, D. Maude, M. Zacharias, G. Volonakis, S. D. Stranks, J. Even,et al., Polaronic mass enhancement and polaronic excitons in metal halide perovskites, ACS En- ergy Letters 9, 2696 (2024)

2024
[28]

Simbula, R

A. Simbula, R. Pau, Q. Wang, F. Liu, V. Sarritzu, S. Lai, M. Lodde, F. Mattana, G. Mula, A. Geddo Lehmann, et al. , Polaron plasma in equilibrium with bright exci- tons in 2d and 3d hybrid perovskites, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2100295 (2021)

2021
[29]

W. Tao, C. Zhang, Q. Zhou, Y. Zhao, and H. Zhu, Mo- mentarily trapped exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites, Nature communications12, 1400 (2021)

2021
[30]

W. Tao, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhu, Dynamic exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites and implica- tions for optoelectronic applications, Accounts of chemi- cal research 55, 345 (2022)

2022
[31]

J. Duan, J. Li, G. Divitini, D. Cortecchia, F. Yuan, J. You, S. Liu, A. Petrozza, Z. Wu, and J. Xi, 2d hy- brid perovskites: From static and dynamic structures to potential applications, Advanced Materials36, 2403455 (2024)

2024
[32]

H. Lei, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Feng, H. Zhou, W. Tang, J. Wang, L. Li, G. Nan, W. Xu, et al. , Persistent ex- citon dressed by weak polaronic effect in rigid and har- monic lattice dion–jacobson 2d perovskites, ACS nano 18, 31485 (2024)

2024
[33]

Dyksik, D

M. Dyksik, D. Beret, M. Baranowski, H. Duim, S. Moy- ano, K. Posmyk, A. Mlayah, S. Adjokatse, D. K. Maude, M. A. Loi,et al., Polaron vibronic progression shapes the optical response of 2d perovskites, Advanced Science11, 2305182 (2024)

2024
[34]

Biswas, R

S. Biswas, R. Zhao, F. Alowa, M. Zacharias, S. Shar- ifzadeh, D. F. Coker, D. S. Seferos, and G. D. Sc- holes, Exciton polaron formation and hot-carrier relax- ation in rigid dion–jacobson-type two-dimensional per- ovskites, Nature Materials , 1 (2024)

2024
[35]

K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. Castro Neto, 2d materials and van der waals het- erostructures, Science 353, aac9439 (2016)

2016
[36]

C. Chen, J. Avila, S. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Mucha- Kruczynski, C. Shen, R. Yang, B. Nosarzewski, T. P. Devereaux, G. Zhang, et al. , Emergence of interfacial polarons from electron–phonon coupling in graphene/h- bn van der waals heterostructures, Nano letters18, 1082 (2018)

2018
[37]

M. Kang, S. W. Jung, W. J. Shin, Y. Sohn, S. H. Ryu, T. K. Kim, M. Hoesch, and K. S. Kim, Holstein polaron in a valley-degenerate two-dimensional semiconductor, Nature materials 17, 676 (2018)

2018
[38]

C. Chen, J. Avila, E. Frantzeskakis, A. Levy, and M. C. Asensio, Observation of a two-dimensional liquid of fröh- lich polarons at the bare srtio3 surface, Nature commu- nications 6, 8585 (2015)

2015
[39]

Z. Wang, S. McKeown Walker, A. Tamai, Y. Wang, Z. Ristic, F. Bruno, A. De La Torre, S. Riccò, N. Plumb, M. Shi, et al. , Tailoring the nature and strength of electron–phonon interactions in the srtio 3 (001) 2d elec- tron liquid, Nature materials15, 835 (2016)

2016
[40]

Sak, Theory of surface polarons, Phys

J. Sak, Theory of surface polarons, Phys. Rev. B6, 3981 (1972)

1972
[41]

Xiaoguang, F

W. Xiaoguang, F. Peeters, and J. Devreese, Exact and approximate results for the ground-state energy of a fröh- lich polaron in two dimensions, Physical Review B31, 3420 (1985)

1985
[42]

Li and Z.-W

P.-F. Li and Z.-W. Wang, Optical absorption of fröhlich polaron in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Journal of Applied Physics123 (2018)

2018
[44]

Q. Chen, W. Wang, and F. Peeters, Magneto-polarons in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides, Journal of Applied Physics 123 (2018)

2018
[45]

A. M. Alvertis, J. B. Haber, Z. Li, C. J. Coveney, S. G. Louie, M. R. Filip, and J. B. Neaton, Phonon screening and dissociation of excitons at finite temperatures from first principles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2403434121 (2024)

2024
[46]

W. Lee, A. M. Alvertis, Z. Li, S. G. Louie, M. R. Filip, J.B.Neaton,andE.Kioupakis,Phononscreeningofexci- tons in atomically thin semiconductors, Physical Review Letters 133, 206901 (2024). 7

2024
[47]

Rana and D

R. Rana and D. T. Limmer, On the interplay of elec- tronic and lattice screening on exciton binding in two- dimensional lead halide perovskites, arXiv:2407.08173 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[48]

Sohier, M

T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Two-dimensional fröhlich interaction in transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers: Theoretical modeling and first-principles calculations, Physical Review B94, 085415 (2016)

2016
[49]

W.H.SioandF.Giustino,Unifiedabinitiodescriptionof fröhlich electron-phonon interactions in two-dimensional and three-dimensional materials, Physical Review B105, 115414 (2022)

2022
[50]

L. V. Keldysh, Coulomb interaction in thin semiconduc- tor and semimetal films, JETP Lett.29, 658 (1979)

1979
[51]

N. S. Rytova, The screened potential of a point charge in a thin film, Moscow University Physics Bulletin22, 18 (1967)

1967
[53]

Sohier, M

T. Sohier, M. Gibertini, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, and N. Marzari, Breakdown of optical phonons’ splitting in two-dimensional materials, Nano letters17, 3758 (2017)

2017
[54]

Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (Wiley, 1987)

C. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (Wiley, 1987)

1987
[55]

For simplicity we assume a 2D isotropy of the layer, but this assumption can be readily relaxed
[57]

The remaining parameters are summarized in Table I

For the sake of simplicity in all explicit calculations we assume freestanding atomic monolayers, i.e.ε = 1. The remaining parameters are summarized in Table I
[58]

Sanders, D

N. Sanders, D. Bayerl, G. Shi, K. A. Mengle, and E. Kioupakis, Electronic and optical properties of two- dimensional gan from first-principles, Nano Letters17, 7345–7349 (2017)

2017
[59]

L. Zhao, S. Xu, M. Wang, and S. Lin, Probing the thermodynamic stability and phonon transport in two- dimensional hexagonal aluminum nitride monolayer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 27675 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09706

2016 doi
[60]

Li, F.-n

W. Li, F.-n. Xue, P.-b. Zhao, and Y. Lu, Electronic struc- ture and phonon transport properties of hfse2 under in- plane strain and finite temperature, Physica Scripta99, 105916 (2024)

2024
[61]

Wang, Y.-S

H. Wang, Y.-S. Lan, B. Dai, X.-W. Zhang, Z.- G. Wang, and N.-N. Ge, Improved thermoelectric performance of monolayer hfs2 by strain engineer- ing, ACS Omega 6, 29820 (2021), pMID: 34778655, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04286

2021 doi
[62]

A.PanditandB.Hamad,Theeffectoffinite-temperature and anharmonic lattice dynamics on the thermal conduc- tivity of zrs2 monolayer: self-consistent phonon calcula- tions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 425405 (2021)

2021
[63]

Devreese, Fr\" ohlich polarons

J. Devreese, Fr\" ohlich polarons. lecture course in- cluding detailed theoretical derivations–, arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.06122 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[65]

Vk + f ∗(k) ℏωl,k − ℏ me p · k + ℏ2k2 2me + ℏ2 me k · X k′ |f (k′)|2k′ !!# ˆak + X k

J.-C. Blancon, A. V. Stier, H. Tsai, W. Nie, C. C. Stoumpos, B. Traore, L. Pedesseau, M. Kepenekian, F. Katsutani, G. Noe,et al., Scaling law for excitons in 2d perovskite quantum wells, Nature communications9, 2254 (2018). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL for: Polarons and Exciton-P...

2018
[66]

− σ0me ∆m(ϵe + σ2 0) H0 εr r0 − Y0 εr r0 , (S152) i3 = σ0 − 1 2 mh ∆m 1 (1 + ϵh)(ϵh + σ2 0) π(1 + σ0)√ϵh I0 εr r∞ √ϵh − L0 εr r∞ √ϵh + 2(ϵh − σ0)K0 εr r∞ √ϵh − σ0 − 1 2 me ∆m 1 (1 + ϵe)(ϵe + σ2 0) π(1 + σ0)√ϵe I0 εr r∞ √ϵe − L0 εr r∞ √ϵe + 2(ϵe − σ0)K0 εr r∞ √ϵe (S153) We note...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [43]

W. H. Sio and F. Giustino, Polarons in two-dimensional atomic crystals, Nature Physics19, 629 (2023)

2023

[2] [64]

Such renormalization of the reduced mass naturally emerges in a more accurate treatment of the variational problem [19]

work page

[3] [52]

Cudazzo, I

P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 085406 (2011)

2011

[4] [56]

J. Li, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Tao, W. Zhong, Z. Su, S. Xue, G. Miao, W. Wang, H. Peng, J. Guo, and X. Zhu, Observation of the nonanalytic behavior of opti- cal phonons in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-46229-4 (2024)

doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46229-4 2024

[5] [19]

E. O. Kane, Pollmann-büttner variational method for ex- citonic polarons, Physical Review B18, 6849 (1978)

1978

[6] [1]

159 (Springer, 2010)

A.S.AlexandrovandJ.T.Devreese, Advances in polaron physics, Vol. 159 (Springer, 2010)

2010

[7] [2]

L. D. Landau, Electron motion in crystal lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3, 664 (1933)

1933

[8] [3]

S. I. Pekar, Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz16, 341 (1946)

1946