Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Novel echoes from black holes in conformal Weyl gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that black holes in conformal Weyl gravity emit a new class of gravitational-wave echoes produced by the large-scale cosmic structure encoded in the metric, not by near-horizon modifications.

desk verdict A plausible numerical demonstration that conformal Weyl black holes produce echoes from a large-scale double-peak barrier; the evidence is suggestive but the paper needs convergence and round-trip-time checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03706 v1 pith:TDET3EOA submitted 2025-02-06 gr-qc hep-th

Mehrab Momennia This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5783C3583D05 PACS 04.20.Ex04.25.Nx04.30.Nk04.70.-s
keywords gravitationalwaveechoesconformalWeylgravityquasinormalmodesmassivescalarperturbationsdouble-peakeffectivepotentialcosmologicalconstanttime-domainintegrationPronymethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that black holes in conformal Weyl gravity produce a new class of gravitational-wave echoes, and that these echoes arise from the large-scale structure of the cosmos rather than from modifications near the event horizon. The mechanism is a double-peak effective potential: the usual photon-sphere barrier is joined by a second peak created by the linear term (associated with dark matter) and the quadratic term (the cosmological constant) in the metric function. Simulating a massive scalar field with time-domain integration, the author finds that part of the initial quasinormal ringing is trapped between the two peaks and later escapes as a series of decaying echoes. If this is right, echo searches would probe not only exotic near-horizon physics but also the dark-matter and dark-energy content encoded in the spacetime. The paper also reports that the early ringdown of these black holes has a higher quality factor than Schwarzschild-de Sitter, so the signal is longer-lived.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the double-peak effective potential $V_l(r_*)$ for a massive scalar field on the conformal Weyl black hole background. Its explicit form contains a $-\frac{\Lambda}{3}(\mu^2-\frac{2\Lambda}{3})r^2$ term that suppresses the potential at large radii and a linear $r$-term proportional to $c^2-1$ that raises it at intermediate radii; together, under $\mu^2>\Lambda$ and $c^2<1$, they turn the potential from a single photon-sphere barrier into a double barrier. The associated wave equation is integrated on a light-cone grid following a standard discretization scheme, and the Prony method, a fit of the signal to damped complex exponentials, extracts early-stage quasinormal frequencies from the ringdown portion before echoes set in.

What would settle it

Compute the effective potential for, say, $M=0.5$, $l=2$, $\Lambda=0.001$, $\mu=0.12$ over the full allowed range $c\in(-1,1)$; if for any claimed $c$ there is no local maximum between the photon-sphere peak and the cosmological horizon, or the potential turns negative there, that case cannot produce echoes. A direct numerical search for the echo train in the time-domain signal for such a case would settle whether the reported echoes are tied to the second peak or to numerical artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the metric function $f(r)=c-\frac{2M}{r}-\frac{c^2-1}{6M}r-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^2$, which solves conformal Weyl gravity with integration constants $M$, $c$, and $\Lambda$, supports a massive scalar perturbation whose effective potential has two barriers: the photon-sphere peak and a second, wider peak on the cosmological-horizon side. For parameter values satisfying $\mu^2>\Lambda$ and $c^2<1$, the linear $r$-term raises the potential at intermediate distances and the $-\Lambda r^2/3$ term suppresses it at large distances, creating the second barrier. Time-domain evolution then shows a quasinormal ringdown followed by a train of echoes, with both the real and imaginary parts of the fundamental quasinormal frequency decreasing as $c$ increases. The author interprets the echoes as trapped modes between the two peaks, and stresses that the second barrier is generated by the same terms that encode dark matter and dark energy, so the echoes are cosmological in origin rather than near-horizon artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

The entire echo prediction rests on the assertion that the conditions $\mu^2>\Lambda$ and $c^2<1$ are enough to guarantee a genuine second potential maximum between the photon-sphere peak and the cosmological horizon; the paper supports this with a term-dominance argument and plotted examples, not with a proof over the full parameter range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $c\in(-1,1)$ and suitable $\mu$ and $\Lambda$, the ringdown of a conformal Weyl black hole should contain a series of echoes after the initial quasinormal oscillations; for $|c|\ge 1$ the echoes disappear.
  • The early ringdown is not Schwarzschild-de Sitter-like: the Prony fits give quasinormal frequencies whose real and imaginary parts both shrink as $c$ grows, so the remnant rings longer and at lower frequency.
  • The quality factor of the conformal Weyl black hole ringdown is higher than that of Schwarzschild-de Sitter, making such signals longer-lived and, the paper suggests, more detectable.
  • Because each echo is weaker and lower-frequency than the last, the paper suggests that a cosmological population of such echoes could contribute to the nanohertz gravitational-wave background, although it leaves that as a proposal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same double-peak argument should apply to gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations, not just scalar fields, as long as the corresponding effective potentials keep the same large-distance sign structure; a direct check would extend the scalar-field result.
  • The echo spacing and amplitude ratio in this model are governed by the distance between the photon-sphere peak and the second peak, so the time between echoes could in principle be used to estimate $c$ and $\Lambda$ independently of the early ringdown.
  • If the second peak moves closer to the cosmological horizon as $c$ approaches 1, the echo train should become more widely spaced and weaker, giving a parameter-dependent prediction that a numerical study near $c=1$ could test.
  • The paper's claim implies that observing echoes would not by itself discriminate horizon-scale modifications from large-scale structure, complicating the standard interpretation of echo signals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies massive scalar perturbations on static, spherically symmetric black holes in conformal Weyl gravity, with metric function f(r)=c−2M/r−(c^2−1)/(6M) r−Λr^2/3. It derives the effective potential, claims that for μ^2>Λ and c^2<1 the potential develops a double-peak barrier, and performs time-domain integration of the scalar wave equation. The resulting waveforms are interpreted as a new class of gravitational-wave echoes generated by the large-scale structure (the linear term and the cosmological constant), rather than by near-horizon modifications or wormholes. The Prony method is used to extract quasinormal frequencies from the early ringdown stage. The central claim is that the late-time pulse trains in Figs. 3 and 4 are cavity echoes produced by trapping between the photon-sphere peak and a second, cosmological-horizon-side peak of the effective potential.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the paper would identify a genuinely new mechanism for black-hole echoes, distinct from the usual near-horizon or wormhole scenarios, and it would connect conformal Weyl gravity to an observable gravitational-wave signature. A notable strength is that the double-peak potential is derived analytically from the metric and the standard master equation, so the echo mechanism is not fitted to the waveform. The paper also cross-checks the c=1 quasinormal frequencies against WKB and AIM results. However, the central echo identification currently rests on visual inspection of time-domain profiles; the cavity interpretation is asserted but not quantitatively confirmed. The work is therefore of interest to the black-hole spectroscopy and modified-gravity communities, provided the missing numerical and physical checks are supplied.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV, Figs. 3-4 and Eq. (10)] The paper identifies the late-time pulses in Figs. 3 and 4 as cavity echoes, but it never computes the tortoise-coordinate round-trip time Δt = 2 ∫_{r1}^{r2} dr/f(r) between the two potential maxima, nor does it compare this duration with the measured echo spacing. The numerical setup (grid step, domain size, boundary treatment) and convergence tests are also absent. The c=1 comparison in Fig. 2 shows only that the single-peak potential does not produce pulses; it does not establish that the pulses seen for c<1 are trapped between the two peaks rather than being massive-field tails, mode beating, or numerical artifacts. This quantitative check is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Sec. IIIA, Eq. (12) and Fig. 1] The sufficiency of the conditions μ^2>Λ and c^2<1 for a double-peak potential is asserted from term dominance, not proven. The paper does not map the parameter region in which a second maximum actually lies between the photon-sphere peak and the cosmological horizon, and it does not specify for which values of c, μ, and Λ the statement 'echoes can be observed for c∈(−1,1)' holds. A concrete test would be to plot the number and location of extrema of V_l(r) as a function of parameters, or to give an analytic condition under which the linear r-term raises the potential before the r^2-term suppresses it.
  3. [Sec. IIIB and IV] The time-domain integration is not reproducible from the text. The paper does not report the grid step Δ, the domain size in r or r*, the boundary conditions, the initial data parameters σ and v_c, or the observer location beyond 'r*~21'. Similarly, the Prony extraction in Sec. IIIC and Table I does not state the number of exponentials p or the time window used; the sensitivity to the window is mentioned but not quantified. These details are needed to verify that the echo waveforms and the QNM frequencies in Table I are numerically stable.
  4. [Sec. IV, last paragraph] The statement 'These echoes disappear for |c|≥1' is not supported by any shown case; only c=1 is displayed in Fig. 2. To substantiate the disappearance claim, the paper should show at least one time-domain profile for c>1 (or c<−1) or an explicit potential analysis for that regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. V] The phrase 'show that they are generated due to the large-scale structure of the cosmos' overstates the evidence; the paper demonstrates a correlation between the double-peak potential and echoes, not a causal demonstration. Suggest softening to 'suggest' or 'provide evidence for'.
  2. [Fig. 1] The curves for c≠1 are horizontally shifted, so the relative peak locations cannot be read off directly; consider plotting without shifts or labeling the peak positions in r*.
  3. [Sec. IIIA, text after Eq. (12)] The statement that the linear r-term is 'responsible for dark matter' is interpretation-dependent and contested, as acknowledged by Refs. [99-101]; recommend presenting it as one possible interpretation rather than as an established fact.
  4. [Sec. IV and Table I] The paper does not report the amplitude ratio of echoes to the initial ringdown, which would help quantify the claim of 'more intense echoes' made in the Introduction and could be compared with other echo scenarios.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the double-peak potential and waveforms follow from the metric and the standard scalar master equation; the main evidentiary gap (unverified echo interval) is under-support, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The metric (7) is taken from the conformal Weyl gravity solution literature, and the effective potential (9) is the standard massive-scalar master equation; substituting (7) into (9) gives the explicit potential (11) by algebra. The double-peak conditions (12) are presented as term-dominance requirements read off from (11), not as fits to the waveforms. The time-domain profiles in Figs. 3-4 are produced by the standard null-cone integration scheme (13)-(14) with the stated Gaussian initial data, and the Prony method is applied to the same signal only to report QNM frequencies of the early ringing stage; those frequencies are not asserted to be independent predictions. The self-citations [24,30,53] set the metric conventions and quote the standard perturbation equation, and the Schwarzschild-dS QNM comparison in Table I is checked against WKB and AIM values from [30]; none of these citations carries the central claim by itself. The principal weakness is evidentiary, not circular: the paper identifies the late-time pulses as echoes without comparing their spacing to the tortoise-coordinate round-trip time 2*int_{r1}^{r2} dr/f(r) and without convergence or domain-size checks, so the echo interpretation is under-supported. Under the hard rules, missing support is not circularity unless a specific equation or fitted quantity is shown to reduce to its own input, which does not occur here.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, fields, or conserved quantities. Its central claim depends on hand-chosen values of M, Lambda, mu, and c, and on the standard scalar-field master equation in the conformal Weyl background. The most delicate assumption is that the conditions in Eq. (12) guarantee the double-peak potential; the paper supports this with a term-dominance argument and figures, but not with a rigorous proof or a full parameter survey.

free parameters (5)
  • M (black hole mass) = 0.5
    Chosen as the mass scale for the numerical demonstration; all ringdown and echo times scale with M.
  • Lambda (cosmological constant) = 0.001
    Chosen by hand; large enough to suppress the effective potential at large r and form the second peak, but not tied to the observed dark energy density.
  • mu (scalar field mass) = 0.12
    Chosen so that mu^2 > Lambda and mu^2 > 2 Lambda / 3; without this choice the second peak does not form. Not derived from a particle-physics model.
  • c (conformal parameter) = 0.2 to 0.9
    Varied in the allowed interval c^2 < 1 to demonstrate echoes; the physical value is not fixed by observations.
  • l (multipole number) = 2
    Chosen for illustration because echoes are more visible for l=2; other multipoles are not shown.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The line element (7) with parameters M, c, Lambda is a vacuum solution of the Bach equation (3).
    Taken from Riegert and Mannheim-Kazanas; the paper does not re-derive this solution.
  • domain assumption The massive scalar field evolution is governed by the minimally coupled wave equation (8)-(9).
    Standard for scalar test fields on a fixed background; no derivation is given.
  • ad hoc to paper The conditions (12), mu^2 > Lambda and c^2 < 1, are sufficient for the double-peak effective potential.
    Argued via term dominance in Eq. (11), not proven; the full parameter range is not mapped.
  • domain assumption The discretized time-domain scheme (14) with unspecified grid spacing Delta is stable and convergent.
    Follows Gundlach-Price-Pullin, but no convergence tests are reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel echoes from black holes in conformal Weyl gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TDET3EOA

@misc{pith2026250203706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel echoes from black holes in conformal Weyl gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TDET3EOA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03706}
}
read the original abstract

We reveal a novel class of echoes from black holes in conformal Weyl gravity and show that they are generated due to the large-scale structure of the cosmos, rather than near-horizon modifications of black holes as well as wormhole spacetimes. To this end, we take into account the evolution of a massive scalar perturbation on the background geometry of conformal Weyl black holes and show that the corresponding effective potential enjoys a double-peak barrier against the incident scalar waves. We perform the calculations for the time evolution profiles of scalar perturbations to understand how the linear term in the metric function and the cosmological constant produce echoes. The Prony method is also employed to calculate the quasinormal frequencies of the early-stage quasinormal ringing phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03706 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The effective potential versus tortoise coordinate fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The semilogarithmic plot of the time-domain profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The time evolution of the wave function Ψ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The time-domain profile for the scalar field perturbat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Schematic Penrose diagram of the scalar wave echoes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Atomic clocks and gravitational waves as probes of non-metricity

    gr-qc 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims existing gravitational-wave data already bound Weyl non-metricity, α²ω̄0<10⁻⁶⁹ GeV, via backreaction of a Planck-scale Weyl field, but a dropped kinetic term numerically exceeds the assumed sensitivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [57]

    Skvortsova, Long lived quasinormal modes of regular and extreme black holes , [DOI:10.1209/0295- 5075/adaee2]

    M. Skvortsova, Long lived quasinormal modes of regular and extreme black holes , [DOI:10.1209/0295- 5075/adaee2]

    doi:10.1209/0295-

  2. [1]

    2 initial outburst, 1 . 051 − 0. 0780i, echoes 6. 7372

  3. [2]

    9975 − 0

    3 initial outburst, 0 . 9975 − 0. 0740i, echoes 6. 7399

  4. [3]

    9220 − 0

    4 initial outburst, 0 . 9220 − 0. 0683i, echoes 6. 7496

  5. [4]

    8250 − 0

    5 initial outburst, 0 . 8250 − 0. 0610i, echoes 6. 7623

  6. [5]

    7068 − 0

    6 initial outburst, 0 . 7068 − 0. 0521i, echoes 6. 7831

  7. [6]

    5674 − 0

    7 initial outburst, 0 . 5674 − 0. 0413i, echoes 6. 8693

  8. [7]

    3859 − 0

    8 0. 3859 − 0. 0231i, echoes 8. 3528

Show all 115 references
  1. [8]

    2213 − 0

    9 0. 2213 − 0. 0123i, echoes 8. 9959 1 initial outburst, 0 . 9686 − 0. 1927i 2. 5132 TABLE I: The fundamental QNMs of the scalar field per- turbations for the initial ringdown stage calculated by the Prony method and their corresponding quality factor Q = ω R/ (2ω I ). The sixt...

    2023

  2. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collab- orations], Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102

    2016

  3. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Col- laborations], GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coa- lescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103

    2016

  4. [11]

    C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radia- tion by a Schwarzschild Black-hole , Nature 227 (1970) 936

    1970

  5. [12]

    W. H. Press, Long wave trains of gravitational waves from a vibrating black hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 170 (1971) L105

    1971

  6. [13]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 344 (1975) 441

    1975

  7. [14]

    M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel and S. A. Teukolsky,Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 111102

    2019

  8. [15]

    S. Ma, L. Sun and Y. Chen, Using rational filters to un- cover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914 , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 084010

    2023

  9. [16]

    Cotesta, G

    R. Cotesta, G. Carullo, E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Anal- ysis of Ringdown Overtones in GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 111102

    2022

  10. [17]

    Analysis of Ring- down Overtones in GW150914

    M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Comment on “Analysis of Ring- down Overtones in GW150914” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 169001

    2023

  11. [18]

    Analysis of Ringdown Overtones in GW150914

    G. Carullo, R. Cotesta, E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Reply to Comment on “Analysis of Ringdown Overtones in GW150914”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 169002

    2023

  12. [19]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and C. M. Will, Gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064030

    2006

  13. [20]

    Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class

    L. Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 143001

    2019

  14. [21]

    H. P. Nollert, Topical review. Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars , Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) R159

    1999

  15. [22]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes , Living Rev. Rel. 2 (1999) 2

    1999

  16. [23]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 163001

    2009

  17. [24]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory , Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 793

    2011

  18. [25]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Instability of higher- 9 dimensional charged black holes in the de Sitter world , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 161101

    2009

  19. [26]

    Z. Zhu, S. J. Zhang, C. E. Pellicer, B. Wang and E. Abdalla, Stability of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole in de Sitter background under charged scalar perturbation , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 049904

    2014

  20. [27]

    Momennia, Quasinormal modes of self-dual black holes in loop quantum gravity , Phys

    M. Momennia, Quasinormal modes of self-dual black holes in loop quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 024052

    2022

  21. [28]

    Hod, Bohr’s Correspondence Principle and the Area Spectrum of Quantum Black Holes , Phys

    S. Hod, Bohr’s Correspondence Principle and the Area Spectrum of Quantum Black Holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4293

    1998

  22. [29]

    Dreyer, Quasinormal Modes, the Area Spectrum, and Black Hole Entropy , Phys

    O. Dreyer, Quasinormal Modes, the Area Spectrum, and Black Hole Entropy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 081301

    2003

  23. [30]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents, and quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064016

    2009

  24. [31]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik and A. Zhidenko, Mas- sive nonminimally coupled scalar field in Reissner- Nordstr¨ om spacetime: Long-lived quasinormal modes and instability , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 104033

    2018

  25. [32]

    Momennia and S

    M. Momennia and S. H. Hendi, Near-extremal black holes in Weyl gravity: Quasinormal modes and geodesic instability, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 124025

    2019

  26. [33]

    R. A. Konoplya, Further clarification on quasinor- mal modes/circular null geodesics correspondence, Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137674

    2023

  27. [34]

    G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilib- rium, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 024027

    2000

  28. [35]

    Cardoso and J

    V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild–anti-de Sitter black holes: Electromag- netic and gravitational perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 084017

    2001

  29. [36]

    Berti and K

    E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstr¨ om–anti-de Sitter black holes: Scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 064020

    2003

  30. [37]

    S. H. Hendi and M. Momennia, Thermodynamic de- scription and quasinormal modes of adS black holes in Born-lnfeld massive gravity with a non-abelian hair , JHEP 10 (2019) 207

    2019

  31. [38]

    Momennia, S

    M. Momennia, S. H. Hendi and F. Soltani Bidgoli, Sta- bility and quasinormal modes of black holes in conformal Weyl gravity, Phys. Lett. B 813 (2021) 136028

    2021

  32. [39]

    Guo and Y

    Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, Null geodesics, quasinor- mal modes, and the correspondence with shadows in high-dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 084057

    2020

  33. [40]

    Ma and J

    H. Ma and J. Li, Dirac quasinormal modes of Born- Infeld black hole spacetimes , Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 095102

    2020

  34. [41]

    J. Yang, C. Zhang and Y. Ma, Shadow and stability of quantum-corrected black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 619

    2023

  35. [42]

    S. Yang, W. D. Guo, Q. Tan and Y. X. Liu, Axial grav- itational quasinormal modes of a self-dual black hole in loop quantum gravity , Phys.Rev.D 108 (2023) 024055

    2023

  36. [43]

    E. R. Livine, C. Montagnon, N. Oshita and H. Roussille, Scalar Quasi-Normal Modes of a Loop Quantum Black Hole, JCAP 10 (2024) 037

    2024

  37. [44]

    H. Gong, S. Li, D. Zhang, G. Fu and J. P. Wu, Quasi- normal modes of quantum-corrected black holes , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 044040

    2024

  38. [45]

    L. M. Cao, J. N. Chen, L. B. Wu, L. Xie and Y. S. Zhou, The pseudospectrum and spectrum (in) stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black hole , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 100412

    2024

  39. [46]

    Dubinsky, Quantum gravitational corrections to the Schwarzschild spacetime and quasinormal frequencies , [arXiv:2405.13552]

    A. Dubinsky, Quantum gravitational corrections to the Schwarzschild spacetime and quasinormal frequencies , [arXiv:2405.13552]

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Malik, Perturbations and quasinormal modes of the dirac field in effective quantum gravity , [arXiv:2409.01561]

    Z. Malik, Perturbations and quasinormal modes of the dirac field in effective quantum gravity , [arXiv:2409.01561]

    arXiv

  41. [48]

    C. Y. Chen, H. W. Chiang and J. S. Tsao, Eikonal quasinormal modes and photon orbits of deformed Schwarzschild black holes , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 044068

    2022

  42. [49]

    Gwak, Quasinormal modes in near-extremal spinning C-metric, Eur

    B. Gwak, Quasinormal modes in near-extremal spinning C-metric, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 (2023) 582

    2023

  43. [50]

    Matyjasek, Quasinormal modes of dirty black holes in the effective theory of gravity with a third order cur- vature term , Phys

    J. Matyjasek, Quasinormal modes of dirty black holes in the effective theory of gravity with a third order cur- vature term , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 124046

    2020

  44. [51]

    Myrzakulov, K

    Y. Myrzakulov, K. Myrzakulov, S. Upadhyay and D. V. Singh, Quasinormal modes and phase structure of regular AdS Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20 (2023) 2350121

    2023

  45. [52]

    D. Liu, Y. Yang, S. Wu, Y. Xing, Z. Xu and Z. W. Long, Ringing of a black hole in a dark matter halo , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 104042

    2021

  46. [53]

    Khodadi and J

    M. Khodadi and J. T. Firouzjaee, A survey of strong cosmic censorship conjecture beyond Einstein ’s gravity , Phys. Dark Univ. 37 (2022) 101084

    2022

  47. [54]

    P. A. Gonzalez, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Saavedra and Y. Vasquez, Quasinormal modes for massive charged scalar fields in Reissner-Nordstr¨ om dS black holes: anomalous decay rate, JHEP 06 (2022) 150

    2022

  48. [55]

    Dubinsky and A

    A. Dubinsky and A. Zinhailo, Asymptotic decay and quasinormal frequencies of scalar and Dirac fields around dilaton-de Sitter black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 847

    2024

  49. [56]

    Skvortsova, Ringing of Extreme Regular Black Holes , Gravit

    M. Skvortsova, Ringing of Extreme Regular Black Holes , Gravit. Cosmol. 30 (2024) 279

    2024

  50. [58]

    X. He, B. Wang, S. Chen, R. G. Cai and C. Y. Lin, Quasinormal modes in the background of charged Kaluza–Klein black hole with squashed horizons , Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 392

    2008

  51. [59]

    S. H. Hendi, S. Hajkhalili, M. Jamil and M. Momennia, Stability and phase transition of rotating Kaluza-Klein black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1112

    2021

  52. [60]

    L. M. Cao, L. B. Wu, Y. Zhao and Y. S. Zhou, Quasinor- mal modes of tensor perturbations of Kaluza-Klein black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124023

    2023

  53. [61]

    Momennia and S

    M. Momennia and S. H. Hendi, Quasinormal modes of black holes in Weyl gravity: Electromagnetic and gravi- tational perturbations, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 505

    2020

  54. [62]

    R. A. Konoplya, Conformal Weyl gravity via two stages of quasinormal ringing and late-time behavior , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 044033

    2021

  55. [63]

    Becar, P

    R. Becar, P. A. Gonzalez, F. Moncada and Y. Vasquez, Massive scalar field perturbations in Weyl black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 942

    2023

  56. [64]

    Malik, Quasinormal modes of the Mannheim–Kazanas black holes , Z

    Z. Malik, Quasinormal modes of the Mannheim–Kazanas black holes , Z. Naturforsch. A 10 79, 1063 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Khrabustovskyi, J. Kriz and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal Ringing and Shadows of Black Holes and Wormholes in Dark Matter-Inspired Weyl Gravity, [arXiv:2501.16134]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin and P. Pani, Is the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 171101; ibid, 117 (2016) 089902(E)

    2016

  59. [67]

    Cardoso, S

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palen- zuela and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave signatures of ex- otic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084031

    2016

  60. [68]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes , Nat. Astron. 1 (2017) 586

    2017

  61. [69]

    Maselli, S

    A. Maselli, S. H. Volkel and K. D. Kokkotas, Parame- ter estimation of gravitational wave echoes from exotic compact objects, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 064045

    2017

  62. [70]

    K. W. Tsang, M. Rollier, A. Ghosh, A. Samajdar, M. Agathos, K. Chatziioannou, V. Cardoso, G. Khanna and C. V. D. Broeck, A morphology-independent data analysis method for detecting and characterizing gravi- tational wave echoes , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 024023

    2018

  63. [71]

    Y. T. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Y. Zhou and Y. S. Piao, On echo intervals in gravitational wave echo analysis , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 726

    2019

  64. [72]

    K. A. Bronnikov and R. A. Konoplya, Echoes in brane worlds: Ringing at a black hole-wormhole transition , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 064004

    2020

  65. [73]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Xing, S. Wu and Z. W. Long, Echoes of novel black-bounce spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 104021

    2021

  66. [74]

    G. Guo, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, Echoes from hairy black holes , JHEP 06 (2022) 073

    2022

  67. [75]

    A. Sang, M. Zhang, S. W. Wei and J. Jiang, Echoes of black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamic the- ories, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 291

    2023

  68. [76]

    Abedi, H

    J. Abedi, H. Dykaar and N. Afshordi, Echoes from the abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 082004

    2017

  69. [77]

    Pani and V

    P. Pani and V. Ferrari, On gravitational-wave echoes from neutron-star binary coalescences , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 15LT01

    2018

  70. [78]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Can environ- mental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astro- physics?, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 104059

    2014

  71. [79]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik and A. Zhidenko, Echoes of compact objects: New physics near the surface and matter at a distance , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 024007

    2019

  72. [80]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collabo- ration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1

    2019

  73. [81]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collabo- ration], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way , Astrophys. J. Lett. 930 (2022) L12

    2022

  74. [82]

    J. B. Hartle and K. S. Thorne, Slowly Rotating Rela- tivistic Stars. II. Models for Neutron Stars and Super- massive Stars , Astrophys. J. 153 (1968) 807

    1968

  75. [83]

    Garcia, D

    A. Garcia, D. Galtsov and O. Kechkin, Class of sta- tionary axisymmetric solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell- Dilaton-Axion field equations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1276

    1995

  76. [84]

    Modesto, Semiclassical loop quantum black hole , Int

    L. Modesto, Semiclassical loop quantum black hole , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49 (2010) 1649

    2010

  77. [85]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Kerr Black Holes with Scalar Hair , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 221101

    2014

  78. [86]

    S. H. Hendi and M. Momennia, Thermodynamic insta- bility of topological black holes with nonlinear source , Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 54

    2015

  79. [87]

    S. H. Hendi, S. Panahiyan, B. Eslam Panah, M. Faizal and M. Momennia, Critical behavior of charged black holes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity’s rainbow , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024028

    2016

  80. [88]

    S. H. Hendi and M. Momennia, AdS charged black holes in Einstein-Yang-Mills gravity’s rainbow: Thermal sta- bility and P-V criticality , Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 222

    2018

  81. [89]

    Bah and P

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, Topological stars and black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 151101

    2021

  82. [90]

    Hergott, V

    S. Hergott, V. Husain and S. Rastgoo, Model met- rics for quantum black hole evolution: Gravitational collapse, singularity resolution, and transient horizons , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 046012

    2022

  83. [91]

    M. M. Lima and C. Gomes, Black Hole Solutions in Non-Minimally Coupled Weyl Connection Gravity , Uni- verse 10 (2024) 433

    2024

  84. [92]

    Momennia, A

    M. Momennia, A. Herrera-Aguilar and U. Nucamendi, Kerr black hole in de Sitter spacetime and observational redshift: Toward a new method to measure the Hubble constant, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 104041

    2023

  85. [93]

    S. M. Carroll, The Cosmological Constant , Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1

    2001

  86. [94]

    R. J. Riegert, Birkhoff ’s Theorem in Conformal Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 315

    1984

  87. [95]

    P. D. Mannheim and J. G. O’Brien, Impact of a Global Quadratic Potential on Galactic Rotation Curves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 121101

    2011

  88. [96]

    P. D. Mannheim, Making the Case for Conformal Grav- ity, Found. Phys. 42 (2012) 388

    2012

  89. [97]

    Weyl, Republication of: Purely infinitesimal geome- try by Hermann Weyl , Gen

    H. Weyl, Republication of: Purely infinitesimal geome- try by Hermann Weyl , Gen. Rel. Grav. 54 (2022) 51

    2022

  90. [98]

    Corral, G

    C. Corral, G. Giribet and R. Olea, Self-dual grav- itational instantons in conformal gravity: Conserved charges and thermodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 064026

    2021

  91. [99]

    Fathi, M

    M. Fathi, M. Olivares and J. R. Villanueva, Ergosphere, Photon Region Structure, and the Shadow of a Rotating Charged Weyl Black Hole , Galaxies 9 (2021) 43

    2021

  92. [100]

    A. Hell, D. Lust and G. Zoupanos, On the Ghost Prob- lem of Conformal Gravity , JHEP 08 (2023) 168

    2023

  93. [101]

    Gregoris, Y

    D. Gregoris, Y. C. Ong and B. Wang, A critical assess- ment of black hole solutions with a linear term in their redshift function, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 684

    2021

  94. [102]

    Aggarwal, D

    D. Aggarwal, D. Chang, Q. D. Helmers, N. Sivrioglu, L. R. Ram-Mohan, L. Rodriguez, S. Rodriguez and R. Suleiman, N¨ other currents, black hole entropy univer- sality and CFT duality in conformal Weyl gravity , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32 (2023) 2350017

    2023

  95. [103]

    Bach, Zur Weylschen Relativit¨ atstheorie und der Weylschen Erweiterung des Kr¨ ummungstensorbegriffs , Math

    R. Bach, Zur Weylschen Relativit¨ atstheorie und der Weylschen Erweiterung des Kr¨ ummungstensorbegriffs , Math. Z. 9 (1921) 110

    1921

  96. [104]

    R. J. Riegert, The particle content of linearized confor- mal gravity , Phys. Lett. A 105 (1984) 110

    1984

  97. [105]

    Yang, Gravitational waves in conformal gravity , Phys

    R. Yang, Gravitational waves in conformal gravity , Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 212. 11

    2018

  98. [106]

    P. D. Mannheim and D. Kazanas, Exact Vacuum Solu- tion to Conformal Weyl Gravity and Galactic Rotation Curves, Astrophys. J. 342 (1989) 635

    1989

  99. [107]

    Horne, Conformal Gravity rotation curves with a conformal Higgs halo , MNRAS 458 (2016) 4122

    K. Horne, Conformal Gravity rotation curves with a conformal Higgs halo , MNRAS 458 (2016) 4122

    2016

  100. [108]

    Hobson and A

    M. Hobson and A. Lasenby, Conformal gravity does not predict flat galaxy rotation curves , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 064014

    2021

  101. [109]

    P. D. Mannheim, Structure of conformal gravity in the presence of a scale breaking scalar field , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54 (2022) 99

    2022

  102. [110]

    Gundlach, R

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price and J. Pullin, Late-time be- havior of stellar collapse and explosions. I. Linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 883

    1994

  103. [111]

    S. L. Marple, Digital spectral analysis with applications , (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1987)

    1987

  104. [112]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez and U. Sperhake, Mining information from binary black hole mergers: A comparison of estimation methods for complex exponen- tials in noise , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 124017

    2007

  105. [113]

    S. F. Shen, K. Lin, T. Zhu, Y. P. Yan, C. G. Shao and W. L. Qian, Two distinct types of echoes in compact objects, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 084022

    2024

  106. [114]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazie et al. [NANOGrav Collaboration], The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L8

    2023

  107. [115]

    Afzal et al

    A. Afzal et al. [NANOGrav Collaboration], The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.