Flavor Constraints in a Generational Three Higgs Doublet Model

Kevin Toner; Wolfgang Altmannshofer

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Flavor Constraints in a Generational Three Higgs Doublet Model

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a generational three-Higgs-doublet model can keep its extra Higgs bosons near 1.5 TeV, provided the only flavor violation is the minimal CKM-required amount.

desk verdict A careful 3HDM flavor paper whose TeV window is real only in a tuned xij=yij=0 benchmark that no symmetry enforces. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04579 v2 pith:JGPCX3XF submitted 2025-02-07 hep-ph

Wolfgang Altmannshofer , Kevin Toner This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords threeHiggsdoubletmodelflavorchangingneutralcurrentsmesonmixingrarekaondecaysBpuzzlealignmentlimitrank-1Yukawatextures

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a Three Higgs Doublet Model in which each doublet couples mainly to one generation of fermions through rank-1 Yukawa matrices, and asks how light the additional Higgs bosons can be while respecting flavor measurements. It shows that reproducing the CKM matrix forces the neutral Higgs bosons to mediate flavor-changing neutral currents at tree level, so meson mixing and rare B and kaon decays constrain the model. For generic O(1) flavor-violating parameters, kaon mixing alone pushes the extra Higgs masses far beyond collider reach. In the generation-specific limit where only the CKM-required flavor violation remains, the constraints relax and masses around 1.5 TeV are allowed for a moderate hierarchy of vacuum expectation values. A sympathetic reader would care because this identifies a concrete, testable region of a model that partially explains the fermion mass hierarchy without invoking natural flavor conservation.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the rank-1 Yukawa textures, one per Higgs doublet, together with the alignment and decoupling limit in which the three vacuum expectation values are hierarchical ($v_1\ll v_2\ll v_3$), parameterized by $\tan\beta$ and $\tan\beta'$. The flavor-violating parameters $x_{ij}$ and $y_{ij}$ encode the freedom beyond the minimal CKM-required structure; setting them to zero defines the generation-specific limit. In that limit, the approximate mass degeneracy of CP-even and CP-odd Higgs bosons in the decoupling limit produces cancellations in the meson-mixing amplitudes, leaving rare leptonic decays as the effective probes. The analytic expressions for the $\kappa$ couplings of the physical Higgs bosons to fermion mass eigenstates carry the calculation.

What would settle it

Measure the CP-violating phase in $K^0$-$\bar K^0$ mixing (through $\epsilon_K$) with precision below the current uncertainty; a deviation from the SM prediction would require a nonzero $x_{sd}$ and invalidate the $x_{ij}=y_{ij}=0$ assumption, restoring the multi-TeV mass bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the generational 3HDM remains viable with additional Higgs bosons as light as about 1.5 TeV if the flavor-violating parameters $x_{ij}$ and $y_{ij}$ are set to zero, leaving only the down-type misalignment needed to produce the CKM matrix. In this generation-specific limit, the leading new-physics contributions to $K$, $B$, and $D$ meson mixing cancel in the decoupling limit, and the dominant bounds come instead from the rare leptonic decays $K_L\to\mu^+\mu^-$, $K_L\to e^+e^-$, and $B_{s,d}\to\ell^+\ell^-$. With $1\ll\tan\beta\simeq 5\ll\tan\beta'\simeq 25$, those bounds still permit $m_A$ and $m_{A'}$ around 1.5 TeV. If $x_{ij}$ or $y_{ij}$ are instead of order one, kaon mixing becomes the dominant constraint and requires masses of at least roughly $\tan\beta\times 8.8$ TeV, pushing the new scalars out of LHC reach.

Load-bearing premise

The whole TeV-scale conclusion rests on being able to set all flavor-violating parameters $x_{ij}$ and $y_{ij}$ to zero, which is assumed possible in principle but is not enforced by a symmetry or derived from the vector-like fermion completion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the generation-specific limit is correct, the additional Higgs bosons can sit at roughly 1.5 TeV for $\tan\beta\sim 5$ and $\tan\beta'\sim 25$, and even lower for smaller values of $\tan\beta$ and $\tan\beta'$.
The strongest flavor probes in that limit are $K_L\to\mu^+\mu^-$ and $K_L\to e^+e^-$, followed by $B_s\to\mu^+\mu^-$ and $B^0\to\mu^+\mu^-$, rather than neutral meson mixing.
Generic O(1) flavor-violating parameters would make kaon mixing the dominant constraint, requiring $m_A\gtrsim\tan\beta\times 8.8$ TeV and $m_{A'}\gtrsim\tan\beta'\times 8.8$ TeV.
The 1.5 TeV window is within reach of LHC di-lepton and di-jet resonance searches, which the paper identifies as a natural next step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approximate cancellation that weakens meson-mixing bounds relies on the decoupling-limit mass degeneracy; a full one-loop calculation of charged-Higgs box diagrams could close part of the 1.5 TeV window, since the paper only estimates those contributions.
If the $x_{ij}=y_{ij}=0$ limit is realized by an approximate flavor symmetry rather than by tuning, small but nonzero flavor-changing Higgs couplings to first-generation fermions would remain and could show up in $D$-meson mixing at future facilities.
The same rank-1 structure with hierarchical vevs predicts distinctive lepton-flavor-universality ratios in $\pi\to\ell\nu$ and $K\to\ell\nu$ decays through charged-Higgs exchange, which the paper lists as a follow-up but does not quantify.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a solid, honest model-building paper, but its headline—additional Higgs bosons as light as 1.5 TeV—holds only in a benchmark where all extra flavor-violating parameters xij and yij are set to zero. That benchmark is imposed, not derived. The paper is upfront about this, but it does mean the central claim is conditional.

What's actually new: the generational 3HDM with rank-1 Yukawa matrices, one doublet per fermion generation, extending the flavorful 2HDM program to three doublets. The paper works out the scalar spectrum and couplings in the decoupling limit with large tan beta, tan beta', and gives clean analytic approximations for the flavor observables. The constraint map is comprehensive: kaon, B, D mixing plus Bs/B0/KL to l+l-. They are careful to separate the generic case, where O(1) xij, yij push the scalars to 10-100 TeV (Sec. III.A), from the aligned case, where the leading FCNC contributions cancel and the remaining bounds are weak.

Where it's soft: the xij=yij=0 limit is not enforced by the U(1)^3 symmetries (those act only on the scalar potential) or by the vector-like fermion completion in Appendix B, which generates rank-1 Yukawas but leaves xij, yij as free parameters. The CKM matrix itself requires some off-diagonal down-type Yukawa entries, so this is not a symmetry-restored alignment; it is a choice. The paper does not check whether the alignment is radiatively stable. If xij, yij are O(1), kaon mixing alone demands mA > tan beta * 8.8 TeV, i.e. roughly 40 TeV for tan beta = 5, so the TeV window is a measure-zero slice of parameter space. The paper deserves credit for saying this explicitly, but it should have discussed whether the aligned limit can be realized and maintained. The quartic couplings are also left as O(1) unknowns, so the quoted bounds carry O(1) uncertainties, which the authors acknowledge.

Who this is for: flavor model builders and anyone interested in multi-Higgs collider signatures. It is a useful reference for the bounds and the analytic structure. It should go to peer review. The right referee report would ask the authors to motivate the generation-specific limit—ideally with a symmetry or a UV completion that enforces xij=yij=0—and to comment on radiative stability, perhaps with an RGE check. Even if that cannot be done, the paper is honest enough to stand with the condition on the benchmark clearly stated.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a three-Higgs-doublet extension of the SM in which each doublet has an approximately rank-1 Yukawa coupling to a single fermion generation. The authors derive the scalar mass spectrum and mixing angles in the decoupling limit with a hierarchical vev pattern, give approximate Higgs-fermion couplings, and use them to compute tree-level FCNC contributions to neutral meson mixing and rare B and K decays. For generic O(1) flavor-violating parameters xij,yij, kaon mixing forces the additional Higgs masses above roughly tanβ×8.8 TeV; for the 'generation-specific' choice xij=yij=0, the bounds weaken and the paper concludes that masses around 1.5 TeV are compatible with the considered flavor constraints for tanβ≃5, tanβ′≃25.

Significance. The paper is a careful and mostly transparent model-building analysis. Its analytic treatment of the decoupling limit beyond leading order (Secs. II.B-II.C), the explicit RGE factors and hadronic matrix elements in Appendix A, and the closed-form bounds for generic flavor parameters are useful and make the calculation reproducible. If the xij=yij=0 limit is accepted as a model assumption, the result demonstrates a proof of principle that multi-Higgs models with tree-level FCNCs can have TeV-scale scalars; the rare-decay expressions also give falsifiable predictions for KL→e+e−, KL→μ+μ−, and Bs→μ+μ−. However, the central phenomenological claim is conditional on an alignment that is neither enforced by a symmetry nor tested for radiative stability, and the generic O(1) parameter space is excluded up to tens of TeV. The paper's value is therefore as a clearly delineated benchmark study rather than as a robust prediction for the full model.

major comments (1)

[II.D, III.D, Appendix B] Section III.D states that the new Higgs bosons can be 'comfortably as light as 1.5 TeV' in the generation-specific limit xij=yij=0, and the abstract presents TeV-scale masses as the paper's main finding. This limit is, however, not derived from the symmetries of the model. The U(1)^3 symmetries of Sec. II.A act on the Higgs doublets only; the parameters xij,yij introduced in Eqs. (39)-(42) are the residual flavor mixings of the rank-1 Yukawa construction of Appendix B, and nothing in the vector-like-fermion setup forces the soft-mixing vectors to be aligned so that these parameters vanish. The down-type Yukawa sector necessarily contains CKM-sized off-diagonal entries (Sec. II.D), so the 'generation-specific' point is not a symmetry-restored point. Because Eq. (69) gives mA ≳ tanβ×8.8 TeV for O(1) xsd (≳44 TeV at tanβ=5), the 1.5 TeV window is a measure-zero slice of the parameter space whose radiative stability is not checked. The manuscript should either exhibit a symmetry or dynamical mechanism that enforces xij=yij=0 and estimate loop-level regeneration, or explicitly reframe the TeV-scale statement as an upper bound under an ad hoc flavor assumption.

minor comments (6)

[III.A, III.D] The bounds in Eqs. (64)-(72) are derived under the assumption that the quartic combinations in Eqs. (62), (63), and (71) are O(1) and that there are no accidental cancellations. Since the λi are free parameters, please state more prominently that these are benchmark meson-mixing bounds, not hard model bounds; a short scan over the allowed quartic combinations would remove the ambiguity.
[III.D] The choice tanγ = 1/tanβ′ in Fig. 2 is not derived. From Eq. (28) it corresponds to m12²=m13²; please state this condition and comment on the sensitivity of the plotted regions to γ. The rare-decay bounds that dominate the benchmark are independent of this choice, but the statement would be clearer.
[II.B] The pseudoscalar mixing angle is called γ in Eq. (17) but γA in Eq. (28); please unify the notation.
[Appendix B] The soft-breaking mass-mixing terms that generate the ξ vectors are not written down. Adding them would make the connection between the vector-like setup and the xij,yij parameters of Sec. II.D fully explicit.
[II.D] The notation m^{f1}_{ff'}, m^{f2}_{ff'}, m^{f3}_{ff'} and the roles of xij,yij are dense; a table of symbols and a short summary of which parameters are fixed by masses/CKM and which are free would improve readability.
[Figure 2] The caption refers to colored regions but the text never identifies which color corresponds to which process; a legend is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the TeV-scale window is an explicit benchmark assumption, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that additional Higgs bosons can be as light as about 1.5 TeV in the xij=yij=0 limit, is obtained by computing FCNC amplitudes from the assumed rank-1 Yukawa textures and comparing them with external measurements (PDG, HFLAV, lattice matrix elements, SM predictions from the literature). The xij and yij parameters are not fitted to the observables that bound mA and mA'; they are set to zero as an explicit, acknowledged assumption (Section II.D: 'It is in principle possible to set all the xij, yij to zero'), and the same assumption is then used to derive the constraints summarized in Section III.D. The CKM-induced flavor-changing couplings in the down sector are fixed by the textural parameterization and are not adjusted to match the data. The paper also explicitly reports the opposite regime (O(1) xij,yij leading to mA ≳ tanβ × 8.8 TeV from kaon mixing), which shows that the data are used as constraints rather than as inputs to a fit. Self-citations to earlier flavorful 2HDM papers [12–14] supply the model-building template and some SM-prediction code, but the 3HDM mass matrices, κ couplings, and the meson-mixing and rare-decay expressions are derived in this paper, and the numerical bounds rest on external experimental and lattice inputs. The main weakness, namely the absence of a symmetry enforcing xij=yij=0 and the lack of a radiative-stability check for this alignment, is a model-assumption and correctness concern, not a circularity. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model introduces a small number of free parameters that control the flavor structure and the Higgs spectrum. The central TeV-scale conclusion depends on setting xij and yij to zero, and on assuming O(1) quartic couplings. No new forces or symmetries beyond the softly broken U(1)^3 are introduced.

free parameters (5)

tan beta = benchmark 5 in the moderate-hierarchy scenario
Ratio of third to second generation vevs; controls the couplings of the second-generation Higgs bosons and enters all bounds.
tan beta' = benchmark 25 in the moderate-hierarchy scenario
Ratio involving the first generation vev; controls the first-generation Higgs boson couplings. The TeV-scale conclusion uses this benchmark.
xij, yij (flavor-violating parameters) = set to 0 in the generation-specific limit
O(1) complex parameters parameterizing extra flavor misalignment. The central claim of TeV-scale Higgs masses depends on setting them to zero.
Quartic couplings lambda_i (including combinations lambda_12, lambda_13, lambda_23) = assumed O(1) in numerical estimates
Enter the subleading corrections to CP-even Higgs couplings and meson mixing amplitudes. Bounds such as mA > 206 GeV assume these quartic combinations are of order unity.
Pseudoscalar mixing angle gamma = set to 1/tan beta' in Figure 2
Mixes the two CP-odd Higgs bosons. Its value affects some bounds, and the summary plot fixes it to a natural small value.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The three Higgs doublets carry charges under a softly broken U(1)^3 flavor symmetry, reducing the 3HDM potential to the form in Eq. (4).
Invoked in Section II.A; without this symmetry the potential has 54 arbitrary terms and the model is far less predictive.
domain assumption The Higgs potential is CP conserving, so the imaginary parts of m^2_12, m^2_13, m^2_23 are set to zero.
Assumed in Section II.B to simplify the scalar spectrum; CP-violating effects are left to future work.
domain assumption All Yukawa matrices are rank-1, realized by mixing with vector-like fermions as outlined in Appendix B.
This is the defining structure of the generational 3HDM and controls the pattern of FCNCs.
domain assumption The CKM matrix originates entirely from the down-type Yukawa couplings, while the up-type and lepton sectors are aligned.
Stated in Section II.D and footnote 3; alternative textures are mentioned but not analyzed.
domain assumption The decoupling limit with v^2 << m^2_A, m^2_A' and large tan beta, tan beta' is valid for the analytic bounds.
Used throughout Section III to derive compact expressions for the constraints; the paper acknowledges O(1) uncertainties from these approximations.
standard math One-loop QCD anomalous dimensions from ref. [117] govern the RGE running factors X_i and eta_i in Appendix A.
Background result used to evaluate meson mixing matrix elements at the appropriate scales.

invented entities (1)

Two additional Higgs doublets (Phi_2, Phi_3) and their physical states H, H', A, A', H+-, H'+-
purpose: Provide masses to the second and third fermion generations and produce the flavor-changing neutral current couplings that are the main phenomenological targets of the paper.
No specific masses or couplings are predicted; the paper only derives lower bounds and allowed regions. The entities therefore lack an independent falsifiable handle outside the model framework.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flavor Constraints in a Generational Three Higgs Doublet Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JGPCX3XF

@misc{pith2026250204579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flavor Constraints in a Generational Three Higgs Doublet Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JGPCX3XF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04579}
}

abstract

We propose a Three Higgs Doublet Model (3HDM) that goes beyond natural flavor conservation and in which each of the three Higgs doublets couples mainly to a single generation of fermions via non-standard Yukawa structures. A hierarchy in the vacuum expectation values of the three Higgs doublets can partially address the SM flavor puzzle. In light of the experimentally observed $125$ GeV Higgs boson, we primarily work within a 3HDM alignment limit such that a Standard Model-like Higgs is recovered. In order to reproduce the observed CKM mixing among quarks, the neutral Higgs bosons of the theory necessarily mediate flavor changing neutral currents at the tree level. We consider constraints from neutral kaon, $B$ meson, and $D$ meson mixing as well as from the rare leptonic decays $B_s/B^0/K_L\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^-/e^+e^-$. We identify regions of parameter space in which the new physics Higgs bosons can be as light as a TeV or even lighter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04579 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Flavor constraints on the 3HDM parameter space in the generational limit, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Deconstructed Weak Isospin from a Symplectic Symmetry
hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

An Sp(6) completion of deconstructed weak isospin predicts six new flavour-changing gauge bosons and pushes the intermediate SU(2)^3 breaking scale above ~550 TeV (or ~150 TeV at large scale separation) via K/D mixing...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

CMS collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60 [ 2207.00043]

arXiv 2022
[2]

ATLAS collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery , Nature 607 (2022) 52 [ 2207.00092]

arXiv 2022
[3]

CMS collaboration, Evidence for Higgs boson decay to a pair of muons , JHEP 01 (2021) 148 [2009.04363]

arXiv 2021
[4]

(12) In what follows, we will make the simplifying assumption that the Higgs potential respects CP invariance and set Im( m2

v2 v3 − λ2 3v2 3 − 1 2 (λ5 + λ8)v2 1 + (λ6 + λ9)v2 2 . (12) In what follows, we will make the simplifying assumption that the Higgs potential respects CP invariance and set Im( m2
[5]

λ7 sβ m2 23cβ + m2 13/tβ′ + λ8 cβ m2 23sβ + m2 12/tβ′ + λ9tβ′ m2 12cβ + m2 13sβ # + v4 4

= 0. The general case with CP violation in the Higgs potential and the possible implications will be discussed elsewhere. 8 In the absence of CP violation, nHDM models will contain n physical neutral CP-even Higgs bosons, n − 1 physical neutral CP-odd Higgs bosons, and 2( n − 1) physical charged Higgs bosons. The remaining CP-odd and charged degrees of fr...
[6]

(26) The eigenstate h has a mass of the order of v and has at leading order precisely SM-like couplings

In this limit, one finds to first approximation m2 H ≃ m2 A , m 2 H ′ ≃ m2 A′ , O H ≃ OA . (26) The eigenstate h has a mass of the order of v and has at leading order precisely SM-like couplings. It is thus identified with the 125 GeV Higgs. As we will see in section III, in the approximation (26), an exact cancellation of new physics contributions to the...
[7]

generational

In our numerical analysis, we do not assume any particular hierarchy in the masses of the heavy Higgs bosons. 11 find m2 H ± ≃ m2 A − v2 2 λ9 , m 2 H ± ′≃ m2 A′ − v2 2 λ8 , γ ± ≃ γ + γv 2 2m2 A′ (λ8 − λ9) . (29) Similarly, for the masses of the scalar Higgs bosons we find m2 h ≃ 2v2λ3 , m 2 H ≃ m2 A + 2v2 tan2 β (λ2 + λ3 − λ6 − λ9) = m2 A + 2v2 tan2 β λH ...
[8]

Das and C

A.K. Das and C. Kao, A Two Higgs doublet model for the top quark , Phys. Lett. B 372 (1996) 106 [ hep-ph/9511329]

arXiv 1996

Show all 125 references

[9]

Blechman, A.A

A.E. Blechman, A.A. Petrov and G. Yeghiyan, The Flavor puzzle in multi-Higgs models , JHEP 11 (2010) 075 [ 1009.1612]

2010 arXiv
[10]

Egana-Ugrinovic, S

D. Egana-Ugrinovic, S. Homiller and P.R. Meade, Higgs bosons with large couplings to light quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115041 [ 1908.11376]

2019 arXiv
[11]

ATLAS collaboration, A search for the dimuon decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 135980 [ 2007.07830]

2021 arXiv
[12]

(9) The remaining minimization conditions allow us to express the mass parameters m2 11, m2 22, and m2 33 in terms of the real vacuum expectation values m2 11 = Re(m2
[13]

v3 v1 − λ2 1v2 1 − 1 2 (λ4 + λ7)v2 2 + (λ5 + λ8)v2 3 , (10) m2 22 = Re(m2
[14]

Altmannshofer, S

W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, A.L. Kagan, L. Silvestrini and J. Zupan, Uncovering Mass Generation Through Higgs Flavor Violation , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 031301 [ 1507.07927]

2016 arXiv
[15]

Ghosh, R.S

D. Ghosh, R.S. Gupta and G. Perez, Is the Higgs Mechanism of Fermion Mass Generation a Fact? A Yukawa-less First-Two-Generation Model , Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 504 [1508.01501]

2016 arXiv
[16]

Botella, G.C

F.J. Botella, G.C. Branco, M.N. Rebelo and J.I. Silva-Marcos, What if the masses of the first two quark families are not generated by the standard model Higgs boson? , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115031 [ 1602.08011]

2016 arXiv
[17]

Nishi, The Structure of potentials with N Higgs doublets , Phys

C.C. Nishi, The Structure of potentials with N Higgs doublets , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 055013 [0706.2685]

2007 arXiv
[18]

Altmannshofer and A

W. Altmannshofer and A. Greljo, Recent Progress in Flavor Model Building , 2412.04549

arXiv
[19]

Altmannshofer, J

W. Altmannshofer, J. Eby, S. Gori, M. Lotito, M. Martone and D. Tuckler, Collider Signatures of Flavorful Higgs Bosons , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115032 [ 1610.02398]

2016 arXiv
[20]

Altmannshofer, S

W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, D.J. Robinson and D. Tuckler, The Flavor-locked Flavorful Two Higgs Doublet Model , JHEP 03 (2018) 129 [ 1712.01847]. 34

2018 arXiv
[21]

Altmannshofer and B

W. Altmannshofer and B. Maddock, Flavorful Two Higgs Doublet Models with a Twist , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075005 [ 1805.08659]

2018 arXiv
[22]

Altmannshofer, B

W. Altmannshofer, B. Maddock and D. Tuckler, Rare Top Decays as Probes of Flavorful Higgs Bosons , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015003 [ 1904.10956]

2019 arXiv
[23]

v3 v2 − λ2 2v2 2 − 1 2 (λ4 + λ7)v2 1 + (λ6 + λ9)v2 3 , (11) m2 33 = Re(m2
[24]

Barroso, P.M

A. Barroso, P.M. Ferreira, R. Santos and J.P. Silva, Stability of the normal vacuum in multi-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 085016 [ hep-ph/0608282]

2006 arXiv
[25]

Ivanov and C.C

I.P. Ivanov and C.C. Nishi, Properties of the general NHDM. I. The Orbit space , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 015014 [ 1004.1799]

2010 arXiv
[26]

Ivanov, Properties of the general NHDM

I.P. Ivanov, Properties of the general NHDM. II. Higgs potential and its symmetries , JHEP 07 (2010) 020 [ 1004.1802]

2010 arXiv
[27]

Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria , Eur

K. Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [ 1205.3781]

2012 arXiv
[28]

Ivanov and E

I.P. Ivanov and E. Vdovin, Discrete symmetries in the three-Higgs-doublet model , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095030 [ 1206.7108]

2012 arXiv
[29]

Keus, S.F

V. Keus, S.F. King and S. Moretti, Three-Higgs-doublet models: symmetries, potentials and Higgs boson masses , JHEP 01 (2014) 052 [ 1310.8253]

2014 arXiv
[30]

Maniatis and O

M. Maniatis and O. Nachtmann, Stability and symmetry breaking in the general three-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 02 (2015) 058 [ 1408.6833]

2015 arXiv
[31]

Ivanov and C.C

I.P. Ivanov and C.C. Nishi, Symmetry breaking patterns in 3HDM , JHEP 01 (2015) 021 [1410.6139]

2015 arXiv
[32]

Moretti and K

S. Moretti and K. Yagyu, Constraints on Parameter Space from Perturbative Unitarity in Models with Three Scalar Doublets , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055022 [ 1501.06544]

2015 arXiv
[33]

Maniatis and O

M. Maniatis and O. Nachtmann, Stability and symmetry breaking in the general n-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075017 [ 1504.01736]

2015 arXiv
[34]

Pilaftsis, Symmetries for standard model alignment in multi-Higgs doublet models , Phys

A. Pilaftsis, Symmetries for standard model alignment in multi-Higgs doublet models , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 075012 [ 1602.02017]

2016 arXiv
[35]

Bento, H.E

M.P. Bento, H.E. Haber, J.C. Rom˜ ao and J.a.P. Silva,Multi-Higgs doublet models: physical parametrization, sum rules and unitarity bounds , JHEP 11 (2017) 095 [ 1708.09408]. 35

2017 arXiv
[36]

Pramanick and A

S. Pramanick and A. Raychaudhuri, Three-Higgs-doublet model under A4 symmetry implies alignment, JHEP 01 (2018) 011 [ 1710.04433]

2018 arXiv
[37]

de Medeiros Varzielas and I.P

I. de Medeiros Varzielas and I.P. Ivanov, Recognizing symmetries in a 3HDM in a basis-independent way, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015008 [ 1903.11110]

2019 arXiv
[38]

Das and I

D. Das and I. Saha, Alignment limit in three Higgs-doublet models , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035021 [ 1904.03970]

2019 arXiv
[39]

Faro and I.P

F.S. Faro and I.P. Ivanov, Boundedness from below in the U (1) × U (1) three-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035038 [ 1907.01963]

2019 arXiv
[40]

Darvishi and A

N. Darvishi and A. Pilaftsis, Classifying Accidental Symmetries in Multi-Higgs Doublet Models, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095008 [ 1912.00887]

2020 arXiv
[41]

Ivanov and F

I.P. Ivanov and F. Vaz˜ ao,Yet another lesson on the stability conditions in multi-Higgs potentials, JHEP 11 (2020) 104 [ 2006.00036]

2020 arXiv
[42]

Carrolo, J.C

S. Carrolo, J.C. Rom˜ ao, J.a.P. Silva and F. Vaz˜ ao,Symmetry and decoupling in multi-Higgs boson models, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075026 [ 2102.11303]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Darvishi, M.R

N. Darvishi, M.R. Masouminia and A. Pilaftsis, Maximally symmetric three-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 115017 [ 2106.03159]

2021 arXiv
[44]

Kalinowski, W

J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, M.N. Rebelo and I. de Medeiros Varzielas, 3HDM with ∆(27) symmetry and its phenomenological consequences , JHEP 02 (2023) 231 [ 2112.12699]

2023 arXiv
[45]

Bento, J.C

M.P. Bento, J.C. Rom˜ ao and J.a.P. Silva,Unitarity bounds for all symmetry-constrained 3HDMs, JHEP 08 (2022) 273 [ 2204.13130]

2022 arXiv
[46]

Boto, J.C

R. Boto, J.C. Rom˜ ao and J.a.P. Silva,Bounded from below conditions on a class of symmetry constrained 3HDM, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115010 [ 2208.01068]

2022 arXiv
[47]

Weinberg, Gauge Theory of CP Violation , Phys

S. Weinberg, Gauge Theory of CP Violation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 657

1976
[48]

Ahriche, G

A. Ahriche, G. Faisel, S.-Y. Ho, S. Nasri and J. Tandean, Effects of two inert scalar doublets on Higgs boson interactions and the electroweak phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035020 [ 1501.06605]

2015 arXiv
[49]

de Medeiros Varzielas, S.F

I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S.F. King, C. Luhn and T. Neder, CP-odd invariants for multi-Higgs models: applications with discrete symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 056007 [1603.06942]

2016 arXiv
[50]

Ivanov, C.C

I.P. Ivanov, C.C. Nishi, J.a.P. Silva and A. Trautner, Basis-invariant conditions for CP symmetry of order four , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015039 [ 1810.13396]. 36

2019 arXiv
[51]

Chakraborty and H

I. Chakraborty and H. Roy, Type-I thermal leptogenesis in Z3-symmetric three Higgs doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1038 [ 1909.07790]

2020 arXiv
[52]

Davoudiasl, I.M

H. Davoudiasl, I.M. Lewis and M. Sullivan, Multi-TeV signals of baryogenesis in a Higgs troika model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015024 [ 2103.12089]

2021 arXiv
[53]

Grzadkowski, O.M

B. Grzadkowski, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland, Natural Multi-Higgs Model with Dark Matter and CP Violation , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055013 [ 0904.2173]

2009 arXiv
[54]

Keus, S.F

V. Keus, S.F. King, S. Moretti and D. Sokolowska, Dark Matter with Two Inert Doublets plus One Higgs Doublet , JHEP 11 (2014) 016 [ 1407.7859]

2014 arXiv
[55]

Cordero, J

A. Cordero, J. Hernandez-Sanchez, V. Keus, S.F. King, S. Moretti, D. Rojas et al., Dark Matter Signals at the LHC from a 3HDM , JHEP 05 (2018) 030 [ 1712.09598]

2018 arXiv
[56]

Cordero-Cid, J

A. Cordero-Cid, J. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, V. Keus, S. Moretti, D. Rojas and D. Soko lowska, Lepton collider indirect signatures of dark CP-violation , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 135 [1812.00820]

2020 arXiv
[57]

Aranda, D

A. Aranda, D. Hern´ andez-Otero, J. Hern´ andez-Sanchez, V. Keus, S. Moretti, D. Rojas-Ciofalo et al., Z3 symmetric inert ( 2+1 )-Higgs-doublet model , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015023 [ 1907.12470]

2021 arXiv
[58]

Khater, A

W. Khater, A. Kunˇ cinas, O.M. Ogreid, P. Osland and M.N. Rebelo, Dark matter in three-Higgs-doublet models with S 3 symmetry, JHEP 01 (2022) 120 [ 2108.07026]

2022 arXiv
[59]

Kunˇ cinas, O.M

A. Kunˇ cinas, O.M. Ogreid, P. Osland and M.N. Rebelo, Dark matter in a CP-violating three-Higgs-doublet model with S3 symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 075002 [2204.05684]

2022 arXiv
[60]

Akeroyd, S

A.G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti and J. Hernandez-Sanchez, Light charged Higgs bosons decaying to charm and bottom quarks in models with two or more Higgs doublets , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115002 [ 1203.5769]

2012 arXiv
[61]

Merchand and M

M. Merchand and M. Sher, Three doublet lepton-specific model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055004 [1611.06887]

2017 arXiv
[62]

Camargo-Molina, T

J.E. Camargo-Molina, T. Mandal, R. Pasechnik and J. Wess´ en, Heavy charged scalars from c¯s fusion: A generic search strategy applied to a 3HDM with U(1) × U(1) family symmetry , JHEP 03 (2018) 024 [ 1711.03551]

2018 arXiv
[63]

Akeroyd, S

A.G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti and M. Song, Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to quarks and its search at the LHC and future colliders , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115024 37 [1810.05403]

2018 arXiv
[64]

Akeroyd, S

A.G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti and M. Song, Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to a charm quark and a bottom quark and its search at LEP2 and future e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035021 [ 1908.00826]

2020 arXiv
[65]

Chakraborti, D

M. Chakraborti, D. Das, M. Levy, S. Mukherjee and I. Saha, Prospects for light charged scalars in a three-Higgs-doublet model with Z3 symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075033 [2104.08146]

2021 arXiv
[66]

Ivanov and S.A

I.P. Ivanov and S.A. Obodenko, Constraining CP4 3HDM with Top Quark Decays , Universe 7 (2021) 197 [ 2104.11440]

2021 arXiv
[67]

Grimus, L

W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland, A Precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models, J. Phys. G 35 (2008) 075001 [ 0711.4022]

2008 arXiv
[68]

Akeroyd, S

A.G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti, K. Yagyu and E. Yildirim, Light charged Higgs boson scenario in 3-Higgs doublet models , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1750145 [ 1605.05881]

2017 arXiv
[69]

Solberg, Conditions for the custodial symmetry in multi-Higgs-doublet models , JHEP 05 (2018) 163 [ 1801.00519]

M.A. Solberg, Conditions for the custodial symmetry in multi-Higgs-doublet models , JHEP 05 (2018) 163 [ 1801.00519]

2018 arXiv
[70]

Akeroyd, S

A.G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti, T. Shindou and M. Song, CP asymmetries of B → Xs/Xdγ in models with three Higgs doublets , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015035 [ 2009.05779]

2021 arXiv
[71]

Logan, S

H.E. Logan, S. Moretti, D. Rojas-Ciofalo and M. Song, CP violation from charged Higgs bosons in the three Higgs doublet model , JHEP 07 (2021) 158 [ 2012.08846]

2021 arXiv
[72]

Grossman, Phenomenology of models with more than two Higgs doublets , Nucl

Y. Grossman, Phenomenology of models with more than two Higgs doublets , Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 355 [ hep-ph/9401311]

1994 arXiv
[73]

Cree and H.E

G. Cree and H.E. Logan, Yukawa alignment from natural flavor conservation , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 055021 [ 1106.4039]

2011 arXiv
[74]

Hartmann and W

F. Hartmann and W. Kilian, Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations , Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3055 [ 1405.1901]

2014 arXiv
[75]

Yagyu, Higgs boson couplings in multi-doublet models with natural flavour conservation , Phys

K. Yagyu, Higgs boson couplings in multi-doublet models with natural flavour conservation , Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016) 102 [ 1609.04590]

2016 arXiv
[76]

Pe˜ nuelas and A

A. Pe˜ nuelas and A. Pich,Flavour alignment in multi-Higgs-doublet models , JHEP 12 (2017) 084 [ 1710.02040]

2017 arXiv
[77]

Hern´ andez, S

A.E.C. Hern´ andez, S. Kovalenko, M. Maniatis and I. Schmidt, Fermion mass hierarchy and g − 2 anomalies in an extended 3HDM Model , JHEP 10 (2021) 036 [ 2104.07047]. 38

2021 arXiv
[78]

Das, P.M

D. Das, P.M. Ferreira, A.P. Morais, I. Padilla-Gay, R. Pasechnik and J.P. Rodrigues, A three Higgs doublet model with symmetry-suppressed flavour changing neutral currents , JHEP 11 (2021) 079 [ 2106.06425]

2021 arXiv
[79]

Boto, J.C

R. Boto, J.C. Rom˜ ao and J.a.P. Silva,Current bounds on the type-Z Z3 three-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095006 [ 2106.11977]

2021 arXiv
[80]

D. Das, M. Levy, P.B. Pal, A.M. Prasad, I. Saha and A. Srivastava, Democratic three-Higgs-doublet models: The custodial limit and wrong-sign Yukawa coupling , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 055035 [ 2301.00231]

2023 arXiv
[81]

R. Boto, D. Das, L. Lourenco, J.C. Romao and J.P. Silva, Fingerprinting the type-Z three-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 015020 [ 2304.13494]

2023 arXiv
[82]

Glashow and S

S.L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents , Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1958

1977
[83]

LHCb collaboration, A precise measurement of the B0 meson oscillation frequency , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 412 [ 1604.03475]

2016 arXiv
[84]

18 (2022) 1 [ 2104.04421]

LHCb collaboration, Precise determination of the B0 s –B 0 s oscillation frequency, Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 1 [ 2104.04421]

2022
[85]

Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

2024
[86]

Heavy Flavor A veraging Group, HFLA Vcollaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ -lepton properties as of 2021 , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 052008 [2206.07501]

2023 arXiv
[87]

LHCb collaboration, Measurement of CP Violation in B0 → ψ(→ ℓ+ℓ−)K0 S(→ π+π−) Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 021801 [ 2309.09728]

2024
[88]

LHCb collaboration, Improved Measurement of CP Violation Parameters in B0 s → J/ψK +K− Decays in the Vicinity of the ϕ(1020) Resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 051802 [ 2308.01468]

2024
[89]

Brod and M

J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Charm-Quark Contribution to the CP Violation Parameter ϵK and ∆MK, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801 [ 1108.2036]

2012 arXiv
[90]

Bai, N.H

Z. Bai, N.H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C.T. Sachrajda, A. Soni and J. Yu, KL − KS Mass Difference from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 112003 [ 1406.0916]. 39

2014 arXiv
[91]

Wang, Calculating ∆mK with lattice QCD , PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 141 [2301.01387]

B. Wang, Calculating ∆mK with lattice QCD , PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 141 [2301.01387]

2022 arXiv
[92]

Altmannshofer and N

W. Altmannshofer and N. Lewis, Loop-induced determinations of Vub and Vcb, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 033004 [ 2112.03437]

2022 arXiv
[93]

Dowdall, C.T.H

R.J. Dowdall, C.T.H. Davies, R.R. Horgan, G.P. Lepage, C.J. Monahan, J. Shigemitsu et al., Neutral B-meson mixing from full lattice QCD at the physical point , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 094508 [ 1907.01025]

2019 arXiv
[94]

Fermilab Lattice, MILCcollaboration, B0 (s)-mixing matrix elements from lattice QCD for the Standard Model and beyond , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 113016 [ 1602.03560]

2016 arXiv
[95]

Chetyrkin, J.H

K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser, RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses , Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2000) 43 [ hep-ph/0004189]

2000 arXiv
[96]

Herren and M

F. Herren and M. Steinhauser, Version 3 of RunDec and CRunDec , Comput. Phys. Commun. 224 (2018) 333 [ 1703.03751]

2018 arXiv
[97]

Gorbahn, S

M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, U. Nierste and S. Trine, The supersymmetric Higgs sector and B − ¯B mixing for large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 034030 [ 0901.2065]

2011 arXiv
[98]

Crivellin, A

A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu and C. Greub, Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094031 [ 1303.5877]

2013 arXiv
[99]

Flavour Lattice A veraging Group (FLAG)collaboration, FLAG Review 2021 , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 869 [ 2111.09849]

2022 arXiv
[100]

ETM collaboration, ∆S=2 and ∆C=2 bag parameters in the standard model and beyond from Nf =2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 034516 [ 1505.06639]

2015 arXiv
[101]

Lenz and G

A. Lenz and G. Wilkinson, Mixing and CP Violation in the Charm System , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71 (2021) 59 [ 2011.04443]

2021 arXiv
[102]

X.-Q. Li, J. Lu and A. Pich, B0 s,d → ℓ+ℓ− Decays in the Aligned Two-Higgs-Doublet Model , JHEP 06 (2014) 022 [ 1404.5865]

2014 arXiv
[103]

Altmannshofer, C

W. Altmannshofer, C. Niehoff and D.M. Straub, Bs → µ+µ− as current and future probe of new physics , JHEP 05 (2017) 076 [ 1702.05498]

2017 arXiv
[104]

Arnan, D

P. Arnan, D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, F. Mescia and O. Sumensari,Two Higgs doublet models and b → s exclusive decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 796 [ 1703.03426]. 40

2017 arXiv
[105]

Bobeth, M

C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn, T. Hermann, M. Misiak, E. Stamou and M. Steinhauser, Bs,d → l+l− in the Standard Model with Reduced Theoretical Uncertainty , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 101801 [ 1311.0903]

2014 arXiv
[106]

Beneke, C

M. Beneke, C. Bobeth and R. Szafron, Power-enhanced leading-logarithmic QED corrections to Bq → µ+µ−, JHEP 10 (2019) 232 [ 1908.07011]

2019 arXiv
[107]

ATLAS collaboration, Study of the rare decays of B0 s and B0 mesons into muon pairs using data collected during 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 04 (2019) 098 [1812.03017]

2019 arXiv
[108]

LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the B0 s → µ+µ− decay properties and search for the B0 → µ+µ− and B0 s → µ+µ−γ decays, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 012010 [ 2108.09283]

2022
[109]

CMS collaboration, Measurement of the B0 s → µ+µ− decay properties and search for the B0 → µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137955 [2212.10311]

2023 arXiv
[110]

LHCb collaboration, Search for the Rare Decays B0 s → e+e− and B0 → e+e−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211802 [ 2003.03999]

2020
[111]

De Bruyn, R

K. De Bruyn, R. Fleischer, R. Knegjens, P. Koppenburg, M. Merk, A. Pellegrino et al., Probing New Physics via the B0 s → µ+µ− Effective Lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041801 [1204.1737]

2012 arXiv
[112]

Altmannshofer and P

W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021 , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 952 [ 2103.13370]

2021 arXiv
[113]

KLOE collaboration, Search for the KS → e+e− decay with the KLOE detector , Phys. Lett. B 672 (2009) 203 [ 0811.1007]

2009 arXiv
[114]

LHCb collaboration, Constraints on the K0 S → µ+µ− Branching Fraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 231801 [ 2001.10354]

2020
[115]

Isidori and R

G. Isidori and R. Unterdorfer, On the short distance constraints from KL,S → µ+µ−, JHEP 01 (2004) 009 [ hep-ph/0311084]

2004 arXiv
[116]

Cirigliano, G

V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Kaon Decays in the Standard Model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 399 [ 1107.6001]

2012 arXiv
[117]

Hoferichter, B.-L

M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and J.R. de Elvira, Improved Standard-Model prediction for KL → ℓ+ℓ−, JHEP 04 (2024) 071 [ 2310.17689]. 41

2024 arXiv
[118]

Gomez Dumm and A

D. Gomez Dumm and A. Pich, Long distance contributions to the KL → µ+µ− decay width, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4633 [ hep-ph/9801298]

1998 arXiv
[119]

Brod and E

J. Brod and E. Stamou, Impact of indirect CP violation on Br (KS → µ+µ−)ℓ=0, JHEP 05 (2023) 155 [ 2209.07445]

2023 arXiv
[120]

Gorbahn and U

M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Charm Quark Contribution to KL → µ+µ− at Next-to-Next-to-Leading, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 122002 [ hep-ph/0605203]

2006 arXiv
[121]

PiENu collaboration, Improved Measurement of the π → eν Branching Ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071801 [ 1506.05845]

2015 arXiv
[122]

PIONEER collaboration, PIONEER: Studies of Rare Pion Decays , 2203.01981

arXiv
[123]

NA62 collaboration, Precision Measurement of the Ratio of the Charged Kaon Leptonic Decay Rates, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 326 [ 1212.4012]

2013 arXiv
[124]

Buras, M

A.J. Buras, M. Misiak and J. Urban, Two loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavor changing four quark operators within and beyond the standard model , Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 397 [ hep-ph/0005183]

2000 arXiv
[125]

Kagan, Radiative Quark Mass and Mixing Hierarchies From Supersymmetric Models With a Fourth Mirror Family , Phys

A.L. Kagan, Radiative Quark Mass and Mixing Hierarchies From Supersymmetric Models With a Fourth Mirror Family , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 173

1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

CMS collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60 [ 2207.00043]

arXiv 2022

[2] [2]

ATLAS collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery , Nature 607 (2022) 52 [ 2207.00092]

arXiv 2022

[3] [3]

CMS collaboration, Evidence for Higgs boson decay to a pair of muons , JHEP 01 (2021) 148 [2009.04363]

arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

(12) In what follows, we will make the simplifying assumption that the Higgs potential respects CP invariance and set Im( m2

v2 v3 − λ2 3v2 3 − 1 2 (λ5 + λ8)v2 1 + (λ6 + λ9)v2 2 . (12) In what follows, we will make the simplifying assumption that the Higgs potential respects CP invariance and set Im( m2

[5] [5]

λ7 sβ m2 23cβ + m2 13/tβ′ + λ8 cβ m2 23sβ + m2 12/tβ′ + λ9tβ′ m2 12cβ + m2 13sβ # + v4 4

= 0. The general case with CP violation in the Higgs potential and the possible implications will be discussed elsewhere. 8 In the absence of CP violation, nHDM models will contain n physical neutral CP-even Higgs bosons, n − 1 physical neutral CP-odd Higgs bosons, and 2( n − 1) physical charged Higgs bosons. The remaining CP-odd and charged degrees of fr...

[6] [6]

(26) The eigenstate h has a mass of the order of v and has at leading order precisely SM-like couplings

In this limit, one finds to first approximation m2 H ≃ m2 A , m 2 H ′ ≃ m2 A′ , O H ≃ OA . (26) The eigenstate h has a mass of the order of v and has at leading order precisely SM-like couplings. It is thus identified with the 125 GeV Higgs. As we will see in section III, in the approximation (26), an exact cancellation of new physics contributions to the...

[7] [7]

generational

In our numerical analysis, we do not assume any particular hierarchy in the masses of the heavy Higgs bosons. 11 find m2 H ± ≃ m2 A − v2 2 λ9 , m 2 H ± ′≃ m2 A′ − v2 2 λ8 , γ ± ≃ γ + γv 2 2m2 A′ (λ8 − λ9) . (29) Similarly, for the masses of the scalar Higgs bosons we find m2 h ≃ 2v2λ3 , m 2 H ≃ m2 A + 2v2 tan2 β (λ2 + λ3 − λ6 − λ9) = m2 A + 2v2 tan2 β λH ...

[8] [8]

Das and C

A.K. Das and C. Kao, A Two Higgs doublet model for the top quark , Phys. Lett. B 372 (1996) 106 [ hep-ph/9511329]

arXiv 1996