Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 2 cited by

Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that Einstein's equations are the hydrodynamics of a hidden quantum system, with each causal diamond carrying a finite-dimensional Hilbert space and a universal modular fluctuation law.

desk verdict An honest mini-review of Banks's own HST/hydrodynamic program, not a new result; the central Hilbert-bundle dynamics is not actually defined because the QPR gluing condition is absent, and the paper itself says so. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04924 v1 pith:SKDPOSL6 submitted 2025-02-07 hep-th gr-qc

T. Banks This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 83C4581T2083C57 PACS 04.60.-m04.70.Dy
keywords quantumgravitycausaldiamondsholographicentropyboundCarlip-SolodukhinHilbertbundleprincipleofrelativityhydrodynamicapproachinflationarycosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a classical solution of Einstein's equations is not fundamental but the hydrodynamic description of a hidden quantum system: each causal diamond in the spacetime carries a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose 'empty diamond' state has density matrix $e^{-L_0}/\mathrm{Tr}\,e^{-L_0}$, and the area dependence of that state's entropy and modular fluctuations reproduces general relativity. If this picture is right, quantum gravity does not need a single Hilbert space for the universe: dynamics lives in a Hilbert bundle over time-like geodesics, with unitary embeddings for nested diamonds and a conjectured gluing relation called the Quantum Principle of Relativity. The paper's central universal law is $(\delta K)^2 = \langle K\rangle = A_\diamond/4G_N$ for the modular Hamiltonian $K$ of any causal diamond. The author is explicit that the programme is incomplete: no practical equations enforcing the QPR have been found, and that is called the biggest open problem and biggest failure of the formalism. A sympathetic reader would care because the framework promises a finite, background-dependent quantum gravity replacing QFT near horizons, with concrete cosmological consequences such as a holographic inflation model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Carlip–Solodukhin ansatz: near a diamond's holographic screen, the $d-2$ dimensional surface of maximal area on the diamond boundary, small fluctuations of the transverse conformal factor behave as a massless two-dimensional scalar whose hydrodynamical stress tensor has central charge $c=3Q^2\propto A_\diamond/4G_N$, so Cardy's formula gives the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. This is combined with a fluctuating Dirac operator on the transverse geometry, cut off at a maximal eigenvalue, which renders the screen fuzzy and supplies the fermion labels of the $1+1$ CFT. On top of that sits the Hilbert bundle: over each timelike geodesic one assigns a fiber Hilbert space per diamond, with unitary embeddings $e^{iL_0(t)}e^{-iL_0(t+L_P)}$ for nested proper-time intervals; the missing connective tissue is the QPR, the relation that fixes how overlapping diamonds' tensor factors and entanglement spectra agree across fibers.

What would settle it

Take two timelike geodesics in empty de Sitter space, write the Hilbert-bundle dynamics for each, and compute the reduced density matrix of their largest overlap diamond in both fibers; if no choice of unitary embeddings makes the entanglement spectra coincide, the QPR is false and the claimed unitary dynamics is undefined. A more practical probe is the inflationary power spectrum: the holographic model fixes the tensor normalization from Kerr black-hole entropy fluctuations, so a measured tensor-to-scalar ratio incompatible with that normalization would rule out this specific construction even before the QPR is settled.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that Einstein's equations are the local thermodynamic equations of state for the area law of causal-diamond entropy, so that every classical solution of general relativity defines the hydrodynamics of a quantum system whose fundamental subsystems are the causal diamonds themselves. For each diamond the system is a UV-cutoff $1+1$ dimensional conformal field theory of fermions on a stretched horizon with central charge $c \propto A_\diamond/4G_N$, and its modular Hamiltonian $K$ satisfies $\langle K\rangle = A_\diamond/4G_N$ and $(\delta K)^2 = \langle K\rangle$. Dynamics is not defined by a Hamiltonian on one Hilbert space but by a Hilbert bundle over the space of timelike geodesics; nesting diamonds along a geodesic gives unitary embeddings analogous to half-sided modular flow, and the Quantum Principle of Relativity is the conjectured connection that identifies the largest common diamond of two observers as a tensor factor with the same entanglement spectrum in both fibers. If the QPR can be formulated, the framework yields Poincaré symmetry of the flat-space S-matrix, AdS tensor-network holographic renormalization, a resolution of the firewall paradox, and a finite holographic model of inflation.

Load-bearing premise

The framework stands or falls on the Quantum Principle of Relativity: the claim that a single overlap diamond, seen from two different geodesic observers, is an exactly isomorphic tensor factor with exactly the same entanglement spectrum in both descriptions, and the paper states that no concrete equations implementing this principle have been found.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Causal diamonds have finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, so local operator algebras in quantum gravity are not the Type III factors of algebraic QFT; QFT emerges only as an approximate description of low-entropy constrained states.
  • The firewall paradox is dissolved: near-horizon degrees of freedom are holographic boundary fermions, and an infalling object's encounter with the singularity is its equilibration with the black hole's degrees of freedom rather than a QFT firewall.
  • The cosmological constant is not the energy density of a vacuum state but a parameter regulating the relation between diamond area and proper time, and hence the behaviour of the highest-energy spectrum.
  • In AdS/CFT, the Ryu–Takayanagi and quantum extremal surface formulas do not by themselves establish bulk locality below the AdS radius; locality there must come from constraints on holographic q-bits.
  • In asymptotically flat spacetime, Poincaré invariance of the S-matrix, and in AdS the asymptotic symmetries, would follow from a successful QPR; in de Sitter space no global isometry group acts on a single Hilbert space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the QPR remains unformulated, the Hilbert bundle may survive only as kinematics; the quantitative payload, including the area law, fluctuation law, and inflationary spectra, may be testable without it because those predictions rely mainly on the Carlip–Solodukhin ansatz.
  • The universal law $(\delta K)^2=\langle K\rangle$ is the variance of a Poisson-like counting variable, suggesting the modular Hamiltonian behaves as a number operator for horizon fermions; explicit matrix-model realizations could test this by computing higher cumulants.
  • The holographic inflation section implies concrete, near-term observables: a tensor spectrum sharing the scalar shape with an $\epsilon^{-2}$ enhancement suppressed by $1/g$, possible parity-odd non-Gaussianity, and dark matter as stable Planck-mass remnants; these distinguish the model from field-theoretic inflation.
  • The review's background-dependent philosophy predicts that no universal background-independent formulation exists, so exact de Sitter scattering observables are likely to fail; meaningful dS observables would be relative to a local group of galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper is a mini-review of the author's 'hydrodynamic' approach to quantum gravity, in which a classical solution of Einstein's equations is interpreted as the hydrodynamic description of a hypothetical quantum system. The core proposal is that each causal diamond carries a finite-dimensional Hilbert space built from a cutoff 1+1 dimensional fermionic CFT on a stretched horizon, with central charge proportional to the diamond area, and that the dynamics is organized in a Hilbert bundle over the space of timelike geodesics. Along a single geodesic, nested diamonds are related by unitary embeddings morally analogous to half-sided modular flow; consistency between different geodesic descriptions is supposed to be enforced by a 'Quantum Principle of Relativity' (QPR). The paper reviews applications to AdS/CFT and tensor networks, low-dimensional dilaton gravity models, de Sitter space, and a holographic model of inflation, and it concludes by candidly identifying the missing QPR as the biggest open problem of the framework.

Significance. If the framework were completed, it would amount to a background-dependent, finite-dimensional formulation of quantum gravity with a falsifiable cosmological phenomenology (the holographic inflation model, black-hole-remnant dark matter, and specific predictions for primordial fluctuations). The paper is also valuable as a compact, unusually honest summary of a research program: it explicitly names its own largest unresolved step and does not hide the reliance on earlier work by the same author. Its strengths are the clear presentation of the Carlip-Solodukhin mechanism, the explicit connection to finite-dimensional fermionic Hilbert spaces, and the honest separation of established results (the area law, the modular fluctuation relation for AdS RT diamonds) from conjectural ones. The main weakness is that the central dynamical claim is not demonstrated: the QPR, which is the only proposed mechanism for defining the Hilbert-bundle connection, is described only in words and is explicitly stated to be unformulated. Consequently the paper cannot support the abstract's assertion that quantum dynamics 'is defined' by the Hilbert bundle.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Section 2.1; Section 7] The central claim that quantum dynamics 'is defined' in a Hilbert bundle and 'made consistent' by the Quantum Principle of Relativity is not supported by the manuscript's own statements. Section 2.1 says that 'a formulation of the QPR in terms of a convenient set of equations that can be imposed on the holographic variables has not yet been found' and calls this 'the biggest open problem'; Section 7 repeats that 'the biggest failure of the formalism is a clear mechanism for enforcing the QPR.' Without the QPR, the bundle has no defined transition functions between fibers, and the unitary inter-fiber maps described in the abstract are not defined. The paper should be revised so that the abstract and Section 1 present the Hilbert-bundle dynamics as a conjecture whose completion depends on an unproven principle, not as an established definition.
  2. [Section 7, Eq. (7.1)] Equation (7.1) states the universal law as (δK)^2 = <K> = A⋄/4G_N, with the fluctuation coefficient set to a=1 exactly. This overstates the status established earlier in the paper: Section 1 shows only that a ≈ 1 for CFTs with Einstein-Hilbert duals (with higher-curvature corrections neglected), and that in QFT a=1 is regulator-dependent, with the conformal regulator of [17] giving the model-dependent results of [16]. The universal law should either be stated with the coefficient a made explicit, or the precise regime of validity (Einstein-Hilbert dual, Planck-scale normalization, neglecting higher-curvature terms) should be attached to Eq. (7.1). As written, the equation conceals a model-dependent input.
  3. [Section 1; Section 5; Section 6] The claimed derivation of the area-law entropy and fluctuation law from the Carlip-Solodukhin ansatz depends on input choices that are not fully specified as such. Section 1 notes a 'multiplicative ambiguity in the entropy' resolved only by choosing the Planck scale, and the CFT central charge has a proportionality factor c ∝ A/2G_N that carries the same ambiguity. Section 5 introduces a UV cutoff λ of the stretched-horizon CFT, and Section 6 introduces a fast-scrambling constant C whose value is 'hard to calculate' and simply assumed to be o(1). These are free parameters of the construction, so the advertised 'universal' law is not parameter-free. The paper should explicitly separate the derived content from these assumptions, e.g., by stating that the universal law holds after fixing the central-charge normalization to the Planck scale and for a particular class of regulators.
  4. [Section 6; Reference [78]] The phenomenological validation of the holographic inflation model rests on the claim that 'A fit to the CMB data has been obtained using this model [78]', but reference [78] is listed as 'Manuscript in Preparation'. No data, likelihood analysis, or quantitative comparison is available in the present paper or in a citable publication. Since this fit is presented as a key success of the approach, the claim cannot be checked. The authors should either remove it or replace it with a published or arXiv-posting reference containing the actual fit.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract, 'must have the a density matrix with the same entanglement spectrum' should read 'must have a density matrix with the same entanglement spectrum'.
  2. [Section 1] The sentence 'throwing away the QFT states ... does not effect the agreement' should use 'affect' instead of 'effect'.
  3. [Section 4] There are several typographical errors: 'charge conservation implys' should be 'implies', 'parallell' should be 'parallel', and 'studing' should be 'studying'.
  4. [Section 6] The phrase 'the means square angular momentum fluctuation fluctuation over a horizon volume' contains a duplicated word and should be 'the mean square angular momentum fluctuation over a horizon volume'; also 'nothing fined tuned' should be 'nothing fine-tuned'.
  5. [Section 2.1] The text 'AQFT4 assigns an operator algebra...' contains a stray footnote marker after 'AQFT'; this should be moved to after the word 'AQFT' so that the sentence reads cleanly.
  6. [Section 1] The acronym 'BHJFSB' is used without definition; it should be spelled out at first use (e.g., Bekenstein-Hawking-Jacobson-Fischler-Susskind-Bousso).
  7. [References] Reference [61] is empty and appears to be a missing placeholder; it should be removed or completed.
  8. [Section 5] Equation (5.1), S = (t/L_P)^2 λ L, uses λ and L without a clear definition of their relation to the CFT cutoff; a brief clarification would help the reader follow the scaling argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No equation-level circularity: Eq. (7.1) is a conditional consequence of the stated Carlip-Solodukhin ansatz; the main weaknesses are the unformulated QPR and an in-preparation self-cited CMB fit.

full rationale

The paper does not present a closed derivation in which an output equals an input by construction. Section 7's universal law (δK)^2 = <K> = A⋄/4G_N is explicitly stated to follow from Jacobson [4], Carlip [6], Solodukhin [7], and the Banks-Zurek generalization [8]; the CFT density matrix and c ∝ A⋄/G_N are stated assumptions of that analysis, not quantities fitted to the law being predicted. Section 1 even records the model dependence of the coefficient a in (1.4), so (7.1) is a conditional statement of the CS ansatz rather than an independent first-principles result; the exact equality in (7.1) sets a = 1 for the chosen regulator, but this is an overstatement of the model's scope rather than a fitted input being renamed a prediction. The paper repeatedly flags its own incompleteness: Section 2.1 says "a formulation of the QPR ... has not yet been found. This remains the biggest open problem" and Section 7 calls the missing QPR "the biggest failure of the formalism"; this is an admitted gap, not a circular step. The strongest self-citation concern is the CMB fit cited as [78], "Manuscript in Preparation", used to assert "A fit to the CMB data has been obtained"; this is unverifiable and self-authored, but it is a phenomenological side-claim and is not load-bearing for the formal hydrodynamic derivation, so it raises the score slightly rather than constituting circularity. Overall: no specific equation-level reduction to inputs was found; the central hydrodynamic claim retains independent content from Jacobson/Carlip/Solodukhin and from the AdS/CFT checks discussed in Section 3.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The framework imports the area law and Jacobson's hydrodynamic interpretation from prior literature, assumes the Carlip-Solodukhin CFT ansatz and finite-dimensionality of diamond Hilbert spaces, and depends on the unformulated QPR. The central charge normalization and modular fluctuation coefficient are input choices rather than derived quantities.

free parameters (5)
  • Central charge normalization scale = c = A⋄/(4 G_N) (chosen, not derived)
    In Section 1, after noting a multiplicative ambiguity in CS entropy, the paper selects the Planck scale as 'the only natural choice', fixing the central charge to reproduce the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy rather than deriving it.
  • Modular fluctuation coefficient a = a = 1
    Eq. (1.4) defines <(K-<K>)^2> = a<K> with model-dependent a; the paper sets a=1 for QG using regulators and a replica trick, which is an input assumption for the claimed universal law (7.1).
  • UV cutoff λ of the stretched-horizon CFT = unspecified, near Cardy saddle
    The density of states and entropy depend on the cutoff; the paper notes the cutoff must sit just above the dominant saddle point but does not fix it from first principles.
  • Fast-scrambling constant C = C = o(1)
    In Section 6, the slow-roll constraint ϵ > C [ln(M_P/H)]^{-1} includes a constant C that 'depends on the precise form of the fast scrambling Hamiltonian and is hard to calculate. We will assume it is o(1).' This affects the model's phenomenological predictions.
  • JT meta-stable equilibrium parameter µ^2 = unfixed, positive
    Section 4 introduces a one-parameter family of meta-stable equilibria in the JT gravity model, parametrized by µ^2, without a first-principles determination.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bekenstein-Hawking/Jacobson area law: entropy of a causal diamond is A⋄/(4G_N)
    The entire framework starts from the BHJFSB area law [2] and Jacobson's identification of Einstein's equations as its hydrodynamics [4]; these are imported as established results.
  • ad hoc to paper Carlip-Solodukhin ansatz: near-horizon fluctuations are described by a 1+1D CFT with central charge proportional to area
    The CS argument is cited [6][7] and generalized in [8] by the author; the ansatz that the density matrix is e^{-L0}/Tr e^{-L0} is assumed, not derived from a microscopic theory.
  • domain assumption Finite-dimensional diamond Hilbert spaces
    Section 2.1 notes finite entropy does not force finite dimensions (Type II factors exist) but the paper asserts black hole formation 'suggest strongly' finite-dimensionality, then builds the formalism on it.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence and consistency of the Quantum Principle of Relativity (QPR)
    The QPR is introduced as a conjecture to make the Hilbert bundle consistent; no equation-level formulation exists (Section 2.1), so the entire dynamics rests on this unproven principle.
  • ad hoc to paper Connes'/Dirac operator encoding of geometry and the fermionic stretched-horizon construction
    Section 1 and [25] assume Riemannian geometry is fully captured by the Dirac operator and that expanding fermion fields in its eigenspinors with a UV cutoff gives a valid 'fuzzy' geometry; this is a modeling choice, not a theorem.
invented entities (3)
  • Hilbert bundle over the space of timelike geodesics
    purpose: Provides the arena for quantum dynamics, replacing the single Hilbert space of AQFT with a family of fiber Hilbert spaces linked by unitary embeddings.
    No falsifiable handle outside the framework; it is a proposed mathematical structure with no concrete model satisfying its consistency conditions.
  • Quantum Principle of Relativity (QPR)
    purpose: Supposed to guarantee that overlapping causal diamonds give the same entanglement spectrum regardless of which fiber computes it; the core consistency condition of the framework.
    No equation-level formulation exists and no model is shown to satisfy it; thus no independent evidence.
  • Black hole remnants of mass ~M_P as dark matter
    purpose: Candidates for dark matter in the holographic inflation model, possibly seeding supermassive black holes.
    The paper itself says it is 'not clear' whether such remnants form; no observational handle is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SKDPOSL6

@misc{pith2026250204924,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time: the Hydrodynamic Approach to Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SKDPOSL6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04924}
}
abstract

Results of Jacobson, Carlip and Solodukhin, from the 1990s, suggest a hydrodynamic approach to quantum gravity in which a classical solution of Einstein's equations determines the density matrices of subsystems associated with causal diamonds in the "empty diamond" state of a corresponding quantum system. The subsystem operator algebras are finite dimensional and correspond to a UV cutoff $1 + 1$ dimensional field theory of fermions living on a "stretched horizon" near each diamond's holographic screen. The fields can be thought of as fluctuations of solutions of the screen's Dirac operator around that of the background geometry, expanded up to a maximal Dirac eigenvalue determined by the Carlip-Solodukhin relation between area and central charge. This cutoff renders the screen geometry "fuzzy". Quantum dynamics is defined in a Hilbert bundle over the space of time-like geodesics on the background geometry. A nesting of diamonds along a given geodesic defines a series of unitary embedding maps of diamond Hilbert spaces into each other, analogous to half sided modular flows in quantum field theory. These can be extended into a consistent set of unitary maps of each fiber Hilbert space into itself by a quantum version of the principle of relativity. According to the QPR, the largest diamond in the overlap between any two diamonds is identified with a tensor factor in each individual diamond Hilbert space, and must have the a density matrix with the same entanglement spectrum no matter which fiber dynamics is used to compute it. This brief review summarizes how these ideas play out in a variety of contexts in different dimensions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04924 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Future directed, time symmetric, and past directed nested coverings of a causal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The holoscreens of two consecutive nested causal diamonds, showing how following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Decomposition of amplitudes in HST models into time ordered Feynman-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diamonds in the Bulk and Large-$N$ Scaling in AdS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bulk field algebras of causal diamonds in AdS/CFT require a double-scaling limit, so sub-AdS-radius distances are not described by bulk QFT.

  2. Singularities, Entropy and the Arrow of Time, {\it or} Is CRT a Gauge Symmetry in Quantum Gravity?

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CRT is an asymptotic gauge symmetry in flat/AdS quantum gravity, not a true gauge symmetry, and is absent or only spontaneously broken under special untestable conditions in de Sitter cosmologies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [17]

    Towards a derivation of holographic entangle- ment entropy,

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers, “Towards a derivation of holographic entangle- ment entropy,” JHEP 05, 036 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2011)036 [arXiv:1102.0440 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2011

  2. [16]

    A universal feature of CFT R´ enyi entropy,

    E. Perlmutter, “A universal feature of CFT R´ enyi entropy,” JHEP 03, 117 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2014)117 [arXiv:1308.1083 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [78]

    Banks, S

    T. Banks, S. A, ”Holographic Inflation Model Fit to CMB Data” - Manuscript in Prepa- ration

    work page

  4. [4]

    Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260-1263 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 [arXiv:gr-qc/9504004 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution: The holographic universe,

    L. Susskind and J. Lindesay, “An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution: The holographic universe,” P. Hayden and J. Preskill,“Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,” JHEP 09, 120 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120 [arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]]. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast Scramblers,” ...

    arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,

    S. Carlip, “Black hole entropy from conformal field theory in any dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828-2831 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2828 [arXiv:hep-th/9812013 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Conformal description of horizon’s states,

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Conformal description of horizon’s states,” Phys. Lett. B 454, 213- 222 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00398-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9812056 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,

    T. Banks and K. M. Zurek, “Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.12, 126026 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126026 [arXiv:2108.04806 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    1983 paper on entanglement entropy:

    R. D. Sorkin, “1983 paper on entanglement entropy: ”On the Entropy of the Vacuum outside a Horizon”,” [arXiv:1402.3589 [gr-qc]]; M. Srednicki,“Entropy and area,” Phys. 34 Rev. Lett. 71, 666-669 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.666 [arXiv:hep-th/9303048 [hep-th]]; C. G. Callan...

    1993 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Infinite Conformal Symme- try in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symme- try in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 241, 333-380 (1984) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90052-X

    1984 doi

  3. [12]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quan- tum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quan- tum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752-2756 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    1977 doi

  4. [13]

    Path Integrals for Causal Diamonds and the Covariant Entropy Principle,

    T. Banks, P. Draper and S. Farkas, “Path Integrals for Causal Diamonds and the Covariant Entropy Principle,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.10, 106022 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.106022 [arXiv:2008.03449 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,

    E.Verlinde, K. Zurek, “Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04, 209 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)209 [arXiv:1911.02018 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Aspects of capacity of entan- glement,

    J. De Boer, J. J¨ arvel¨ a and E. Keski-Vakkuri, “Aspects of capacity of entan- glement,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.6, 066012 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066012 [arXiv:1807.07357 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [18]

    On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, “On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,” J. Math. Phys. 17, 303-321 (1976) doi:10.1063/1.522898

    1976 doi

  8. [19]

    Generalized entanglement capacity of de Sitter space,

    T. Banks and P. Draper, “Generalized entanglement capacity of de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.4, 045025 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.045025 [arXiv:2404.13684 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [20]

    The dS / CFT correspondence,

    A. Strominger,“The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 10, 034 (2001) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2001/10/034 [arXiv:hep-th/0106113 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  10. [21]

    Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?,

    L. Dyson, J. Lindesay and L. Susskind, “Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?,” JHEP 08, 045 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/045 [arXiv:hep-th/0202163 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  11. [22]

    M theory observables for cosmological space-times,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “M theory observables for cosmological space-times,” [arXiv:hep-th/0102077 [hep-th]]. 35

    arXiv

  12. [23]

    ”Observables

    T. Banks, “”Observables” in de Sitter Quantum Gravity: in Perturbation Theory and Beyond,” [arXiv:2405.01773 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  13. [24]

    A microscopic realization of dS 3,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and B. M¨ uhlmann,“A microscopic realization of dS 3,” [arXiv:2501.01486 [hep-th]]; S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Ro- driguez, “The complex Liouville string: worldsheet boundaries and non-perturbative ef- fects,” [arXiv:2410.09179 [...

    arXiv

  14. [25]

    Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time Models,

    T. Banks,“Hilbert Bundles and Holographic Space-time Models,” [arXiv:2306.07038 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  15. [26]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 05, 013 (2003) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 [arXiv:astro-ph/0210603 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  16. [27]

    The holographic spacetime model of cosmology,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “The holographic spacetime model of cosmology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, no.14, 1846005 (2018) doi:10.1142/S0218271818460057 [arXiv:1806.01749 [hep-th]]; T. Banks,“Note on Localized Objects as Constrained States of Holographic Variables,” [arXiv:1710....

    2018 arXiv

  17. [28]

    Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press 1994, San Diego

    A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press 1994, San Diego

    1994

  18. [29]

    Fuzzy Geometry via the Spinor Bundle, with Applica- tions to Holographic Space-time and Matrix Theory,

    T. Banks and J. Kehayias, “Fuzzy Geometry via the Spinor Bundle, with Applica- tions to Holographic Space-time and Matrix Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 086008 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.086008 [arXiv:1106.1179 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [30]

    Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and su- perstring theory,

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum, “Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and su- perstring theory,” Phys. Rev. D 50, 2700-2711 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2700 [arXiv:hep-th/9401070 [hep-th]]; T. Jacobson, “Black hole entropy and induced gravity,” [arXiv:gr-qc/9404039 [gr...

    1994 arXiv

  20. [31]

    Is the black hole complementarity principle really necessary?,

    N. Itzhaki,“Is the black hole complementarity principle really necessary?,” [arXiv:hep- th/9607028 [hep-th]]; S. D. Mathur,“The Information paradox: A Pedagog- ical introduction,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 224001 (2009) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/26/22/224001 [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-t...

    2009

  21. [32]

    Average entropy of a subsystem,

    D. N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291-1294 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291 [arXiv:gr-qc/9305007 [gr-qc]]

    1993 arXiv

  22. [33]

    Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant,

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, “Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4971-4974 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4971 [arXiv:hep-th/9803132 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  23. [34]

    Remarks on the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound,

    T. Banks and P. Draper, “Remarks on the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.12, 126010 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.126010 [arXiv:1911.05778 [hep- th]]; N. Blinov and P. Draper,“Densities of states and the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.7, 076...

    2020 arXiv

  24. [35]

    CONFORMAL SUPERGRA V- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,

    M. A. Awada, G. W. Gibbons and W. T. Shaw, “CONFORMAL SUPERGRA V- ITY, TWISTORS AND THE SUPER BMS GROUP,” Annals Phys. 171, 52 (1986) doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(86)80023-9

    1986 doi

  25. [36]

    Current Algebra on the Conformal Boundary and the Variables of Quantum Gravity,

    T. Banks, “Current Algebra on the Conformal Boundary and the Variables of Quantum Gravity,” [arXiv:1511.01147 [hep-th]]; T. Banks, “The Super BMS Algebra, Scattering and Holography,” [arXiv:1403.3420 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  26. [37]

    Holographic Space-time, Newton’s Law and the Dynamics of Black Holes,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Space-time, Newton’s Law and the Dynamics of Black Holes,” [arXiv:1606.01267 [hep-th]]; T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Theory of Accelerated Observers, the S-matrix, and the Emergence of Effective Field Theory,” [arXiv:1301.5924 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  27. [38]

    The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity,

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington and S. Vardhan, “The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity,” JHEP 06, 155 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)155 [arXiv:2207.06536 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [39]

    Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,

    T. Banks, B. Fiol and A. Morisse, “Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,” JHEP 12, 004 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/004 [arXiv:hep-th/0609062 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [40]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Ther- modynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,“Cosmological Event Horizons, Ther- modynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738-2751 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    1977 doi

  30. [41]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept.323, 183-386 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370- 1573(99)00083-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9905111 [hep-th]]. 37

    2000 arXiv

  31. [42]

    Nonlocal string theories on AdS(3) x S**3 and stable nonsupersymmetric backgrounds,

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz and E. Silverstein, “Nonlocal string theories on AdS(3) x S**3 and stable nonsupersymmetric backgrounds,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 106007 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.106007 [arXiv:hep-th/0112178 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  32. [43]

    Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,

    B. Swingle, “Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 065007 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.065007 [arXiv:0905.1317 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [44]

    Tensor Network Renormalization,

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, “Tensor Network Renormalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no.18, 180405 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.180405

    2015 doi

  34. [46]

    Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04, 163 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)163 [arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]]; “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP 06, 149 ...

    2015 arXiv

  35. [47]

    The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction,

    D. Harlow, “The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction,” Commun. Math. Phys. 354, no.3, 865-912 (2017) doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2904-z [arXiv:1607.03901 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [48]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,“Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  37. [49]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP 01, 073 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 [arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [50]

    Holographic Space-time Models of Anti-deSitter Space- times,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Space-time Models of Anti-deSitter Space- times,” [arXiv:1607.03510 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  39. [51]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg,“Infrared photons and gravitons,” Phys. Rev. 140, B516-B524 (1965) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.B516

    1965 doi

  40. [52]

    P.P. Kulish ”Asymptotical states of massive particles interacting with gravitational field” , Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, vol.6, N 4, 28 - 35 (1971) / The- oretical and Mathematical Physics ; P.P. Kulish ”Infrared divergences of quantized gravitational field”, Z...

    1971

  41. [53]

    Infrared finite scattering theory in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,

    K. Prabhu, G. Satishchandran and R. M. Wald, “Infrared finite scattering theory in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.6, 066005 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.066005 [arXiv:2203.14334 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [54]

    S matrices from AdS space-time,

    J. Polchinski,“S matrices from AdS space-time,” [arXiv:hep-th/9901076 [hep-th]]; L. Susskind, “Holography in the flat space limit,” AIP Conf. Proc. 493, no.1, 98-112 (1999) doi:10.1063/1.1301570 [arXiv:hep-th/9901079 [hep-th]]. 38

    1999 arXiv

  43. [55]

    Soft Gravitons and the Flat Space Limit of Anti-deSitter Space,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Soft Gravitons and the Flat Space Limit of Anti-deSitter Space,” [arXiv:1611.05906 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  44. [56]

    M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112-5128 (1997) doi:10.1201/9781482268737- 37 [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [57]

    JT gravity coupled to fermions,

    T. Banks, P. Draper and B. Zhang, “JT gravity coupled to fermions,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, no.2, 483-522 (2023) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2023.v27.n2.a2 [arXiv:2205.07382 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [58]

    Anti-de Sitter fragmentation,

    J. M. Maldacena, J. Michelson and A. Strominger, “Anti-de Sitter fragmentation,” JHEP 02, 011 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/02/011 [arXiv:hep-th/9812073 [hep- th]]

    1999 arXiv

  47. [59]

    Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory,

    P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore,“Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/9304011 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  48. [60]

    Time dependent backgrounds of 2-D string theory,

    S. Y. Alexandrov, V. A. Kazakov and I. K. Kostov,“Time dependent backgrounds of 2-D string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 640, 119-144 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00541-2 [arXiv:hep-th/0205079 [hep-th]]. [61]

    2002 arXiv

  49. [62]

    A New hat for the c=1 matrix model,

    M. R. Douglas, I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, J. M. Maldacena, E. J. Martinec and N. Seiberg,“A New hat for the c=1 matrix model,” [arXiv:hep-th/0307195 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  50. [63]

    Flux-vacua in two dimensional string theory,

    J. M. Maldacena and N. Seiberg, “Flux-vacua in two dimensional string theory,” JHEP 09, 077 (2005) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/077 [arXiv:hep-th/0506141 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [64]

    Double scaled field theory at c = 1,

    G. W. Moore, “Double scaled field theory at c = 1,” Nucl. Phys. B 368, 557-590 (1992) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90214-V

    1992 doi

  52. [65]

    The S-matrix of 2D type 0B string theory. Part I. Perturbation theory revisited,

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, “The S-matrix of 2D type 0B string theory. Part I. Perturbation theory revisited,” JHEP 05, 234 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)234 [arXiv:2201.05621 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [66]

    Black hole non-formation in the matrix model,

    J. L. Karczmarek, J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “Black hole non-formation in the matrix model,” JHEP 01, 039 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/039 [arXiv:hep- th/0411174 [hep-th]]

    2006

  54. [67]

    Geometric entropy of nonrelativistic fermions and two-dimensional strings,

    S. R. Das, “Geometric entropy of nonrelativistic fermions and two-dimensional strings,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 6901-6908 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.6901 [arXiv:hep- th/9501090 [hep-th]]

    1995

  55. [68]

    Evanescent black holes,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger,“Evanescent black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 45, no.4, R1005 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.R1005 [arXiv:hep-th/9111056 [hep-th]]. 39

    1992 arXiv

  56. [69]

    Holographic Space-time Models in 1 + 1 Dimensions,

    T. Banks, “Holographic Space-time Models in 1 + 1 Dimensions,” [arXiv:1506.05777 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  57. [70]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09, 002 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002 [arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [71]

    The Endpoint of Hawking radiation,

    J. G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius,“The Endpoint of Hawking radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 3444-3449 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.3444 [arXiv:hep-th/9206070 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  59. [72]

    Microscopic Models of Linear Dilaton Gravity and Their Semi-classical Approximations,

    T. Banks, “Microscopic Models of Linear Dilaton Gravity and Their Semi-classical Approximations,” [arXiv:2005.09479 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  60. [73]

    Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisen- berg magnet,

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye,“Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisen- berg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3339 [arXiv:cond-mat/9212030 [cond-mat]]; A. Kitaev, Talk at KITP Santa Barbara, Sum- mer 2015

    1993 arXiv

  61. [74]

    Holography and cosmology,

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind, “Holography and cosmology,” [arXiv:hep-th/9806039 [hep- th]]

    arXiv

  62. [75]

    A Covariant entropy conjecture,

    R. Bousso, “A Covariant entropy conjecture,” JHEP 07, 004 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/1999/07/004 [arXiv:hep-th/9905177 [hep-th]]; R. Bousso, “Holography in general space-times,” JHEP 06, 028 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/028 [arXiv:hep- th/9906022 [hep-th]]; R. Bouss...

    1999 arXiv

  63. [76]

    Gravitational Thermodynamics of Causal Diamonds in (A)dS,

    T. Jacobson and M. Visser, “Gravitational Thermodynamics of Causal Diamonds in (A)dS,” SciPost Phys. 7, no.6, 079 (2019) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.6.079 [arXiv:1812.01596 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [77]

    Holographic Inflation Revised,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Inflation Revised,” doi:10.1017/9781316535783.013 [arXiv:1501.01686 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  65. [79]

    The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expan- sion and the Hot Cosmological Model,

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, “The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expan- sion and the Hot Cosmological Model,” Sov. Astron. 10, 602 (1967)

    1967

  66. [80]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 399-415 (1974) doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399

    1974 doi

  67. [81]

    Holographic Inflation, Primordial Black Holes and Early Structure Formation,

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, “Holographic Inflation, Primordial Black Holes and Early Structure Formation,” [arXiv:2402.11527 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  68. [82]

    Hydrodynamic Theory of the Connected Spectral form Factor,

    M. Winer and B. Swingle,“Hydrodynamic Theory of the Connected Spectral form Factor,” Phys. Rev. X 12, no.2, 021009 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021009 [arXiv:2012.01436 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]. 40

    2022 arXiv

  69. [83]

    Wormholes in Quantum Mechanics,

    H. Verlinde, “Wormholes in Quantum Mechanics,” [arXiv:2105.02129 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  70. [84]

    Fluctuating Hydrodynamics and Wormholes,

    T. Banks, “Fluctuating Hydrodynamics and Wormholes,” [arXiv:2203.08855 [hep-th]]. 41

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.