Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 134 references

Viscoelasticity reduces the droplet size in mucosalivary film fragmentation during intense respiratory events

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding polymer elasticity to the airway fluid shifts cough droplets from around 20 µm to around 10 µm by making the pre-rupture bags thinner.

desk verdict A credible, well-executed study showing viscoelasticity can shift expelled droplet sizes down in a cough-machine geometry, but the droplet-size evidence rests on a single-point PDA measurement and the simulation support is partly tuned; worth reviewing, not yet conclusive. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05105 v2 pith:ZV2HH6DQ submitted 2025-02-07 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.soft

Mogeng Li , Youssef Saade , Stéphane Zaleski , Uddalok Sen , Pallav Kant , Detlef Lohse This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.soft MSC 76A1076T1076D45
keywords viscoelasticityrespiratorydropletsbagbreakupcoughmachinemucosalivaryfluiddropletsizedistributionOldroyd-Bsheetatomization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the viscoelasticity of the fluid lining the airways is a controlling factor in the sizes of droplets expelled during coughing and sneezing. In a channel that shears a thin liquid film with a cough-like blast of air at 30 m/s, polymer-laden mucosalivary mimics break apart through the same bag-inflation route as ordinary water, but their bags inflate longer and become thinner before bursting. Because the droplets are shed by the unstable retraction of the bag rims, the thinner bags yield smaller expelled droplets, with the mean diameter falling from roughly 20 µm for water to about 10 µm at polymer fractions of 0.1–0.2%. If this is right, the elastic, memory-bearing character of mucus, not just its viscosity, must be included in predictions of how far respiratory aerosol travels and in mitigation strategies aimed at the airway lining fluid.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inflated liquid bag: a thin sheet of liquid stretched between a rim and the still-intact film by aerodynamic pressure, which eventually pops through nucleated holes whose rims retract and shed droplets. Bag size just before rupture sets sheet thickness, and sheet thickness sets the droplet size produced by rim retraction; the paper uses the bag-inflation scaling $L\sim T^2$ to connect longer bag lifetime to larger bag size. Viscoelasticity enters through the Oldroyd-B constitutive model with polymer relaxation time $\lambda$ and elastoinertial number $\Pi$, and the uniformity of thinning is quantified by the mean-squared deviation $\hat{\sigma}^2$ of the local sheet thickness about its minimum: larger Weissenberg number lowers $\hat{\sigma}^2$, meaning bags thin more evenly and survive longer. This chain of objects—bag, hole, Taylor-Culick rim, thickness variance—carries the argument.

What would settle it

Measure the complete droplet-size distribution, including the large-droplet fraction, at the channel exit and at several downstream positions for water and for the polymer solutions; if the mean diameter including all droplets does not decrease with polymer concentration, the central claim fails. Alternatively, a three-dimensional simulation of viscoelastic bag rupture that resolves hole growth without mesh-limited breakup and yields equal or larger droplets at nonzero Weissenberg number would refute the thickness-controlled mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that viscoelastic liquids and Newtonian liquids fragment by the same bag-mediated route in this shear-driven setup, and that the only difference—larger, longer-lived bags in the viscoelastic case—is enough to shift the droplet-size distribution. The proposed mechanism is a chain: polymer relaxation stretches the bag in a more spatially uniform way, so the bag reaches a greater size before the first hole appears; a larger bag of the same liquid volume is a thinner sheet; and when holes open and the bounding rims retract in the Taylor-Culick fashion, thinner sheets emit smaller droplets. The experiments support each link by showing that bag length, width, and lifetime grow with polymer concentration, that the sheet-thickness profile becomes more uniform in Oldroyd-B simulations at higher Weissenberg number, and that the measured mean droplet diameter decreases with polymer concentration before rising again at concentrations where shear thinning appears. The paper presents this as the mechanism by which mucosalivary viscoelasticity controls the expelled aerosol size distribution.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the single-point droplet measurement 15 cm downstream samples Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids with the same bias, so that the recorded shift toward smaller mean diameters reflects a real change in atomization rather than a change in how many large droplets fall out of the puff before they are counted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mucus viscoelasticity should be treated as a first-order input to respiratory aerosol size predictions, alongside surface tension and viscosity.
  • A modest elastic response can produce droplets near 10 µm at low Ohnesorge number, matching sizes that Newtonian fluids reach only at much higher viscosity.
  • The non-monotonic behavior at higher polymer concentration suggests that shear thinning or other high-concentration rheology can partially undo the elastic size reduction.
  • Mitigation strategies that modify airway-lining fluid properties would be expected to change the airborne small-droplet fraction rather than only the total amount of expelled liquid.
  • Bag-mediated atomization models for Newtonian sheets should be extended to include a relaxation time to capture elongated bag shapes and downstream droplet sizes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The droplet statistics come from a single measurement point 15 cm downstream that preferentially captures small airborne droplets; the size reduction could be partly an artifact if viscoelasticity causes more large droplets to fall out before reaching that point, a bias the paper acknowledges but does not quantify.
  • A natural extension is to measure the full size distribution at multiple downstream stations or at the channel exit, which would separate true size reduction from differential settling of large droplets.
  • The same chain—elastic stretching, thinner bags, smaller rim-retraction droplets—should apply to other sheared viscoelastic films, for example sea-spray generation or industrial atomization of polymer solutions, where analogous large-bag structures are observed.
  • Real mucus contains mucin networks, salts, and surfactants, so dilute polyethylene-oxide solutions isolate only the elasticity; how mucin-specific rheology, including strain hardening and heterogeneity, shifts the droplet spectrum remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates how polymer-induced viscoelasticity modifies the shear-driven fragmentation of a thin liquid film in a model 'cough machine' (a 30 cm rectangular channel with a 1 mm film sheared by a pulsed 30 m/s airflow). Experiments with PEO solutions (Cm = 0.05-1.00% by mass) show that fragmentation still occurs through the bag-breakup mode, but the bags are longer, wider, and longer-lived than for a Newtonian liquid (Fig. 3). Phase-Doppler anemometry at 15 cm downstream of the channel exit reports a decrease of the mean droplet diameter from about 20 µm (pure water) to about 10 µm for Cm = 0.10-0.20%, a slight reversal at Cm = 0.50% (attributed to shear thinning), and no droplet detections at Cm = 1.00% (filament-dominated expulsion). The proposed mechanism is that viscoelasticity produces thinner and more uniformly thick bag sheets, so that rim retraction at rupture generates smaller droplets. Axisymmetric Oldroyd-B/volume-of-fluid simulations (Basilisk) of a droplet in an impulsively started airflow, run at Wi = 1 with a trial-and-error-selected elastoinertial number Π = 0.001, show more uniform bag thinning quantified by the mean-squared deviation σ̂² of the thickness profile and are presented as numerical support for this mechanism.

Significance. If the main claim holds, the paper provides a clean experimental demonstration in a regime (bag breakup of a sheared film in a confined geometry) where most prior work on viscoelastic atomization concerned higher-Weber-number modes and generally reported droplet-size increases with polymer concentration. The cough-machine geometry makes the result directly relevant to bioaerosol generation. Strengths: (i) the bag size and lifetime data (Fig. 3) come from direct high-speed imaging and are robust to the PDA sampling criticism; (ii) the fluid characterization (shear rheology, surface tension, capillary-thinning relaxation times; Fig. 1 and Table I) is careful and reproducible; (iii) the simulations use a well-established code (Basilisk) with the log-conformation formulation, and the σ̂² metric is a sensible quantifier of thinning uniformity; (iv) the authors are transparent about the PDA sampling bias, the trial-and-error choice of Π, and the shear-thinning complications at high Cm.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II.A and Section III.C; Fig. 4] The central quantitative claim that viscoelasticity reduces the expelled droplet size rests on PDA distributions measured at a single point, 15 cm downstream of the channel exit along the centerline. As the authors acknowledge in Section II.A, this location preferentially samples droplets that remain airborne while larger droplets fall out ballistically; what is not demonstrated is that the sampled fraction is independent of polymer concentration. Section III.A reports rim-retraction droplets larger than 200 µm for all cases, and for Cm = 1.00% the expelled liquid is mostly filaments with no PDA detections (Section III.C), showing that the partition of expelled mass between the PDA-detectable and the sedimenting populations changes qualitatively with Cm. If, in the 0.05-0.20% range, increasing Cm also shifts more volume into the large-droplet or ligament fraction, the measured decrease of the mean diameter at 15 cm would reflect preferential removal of the large fraction rather than an intrinsic reduction of the droplet sizes generated at rupture. This is exactly the assumption invoked in Section III.C to reconcile the present trend with the opposite trend reported in earlier viscoelastic atomization studies; it should be tested rather than assumed. I request a quantitative assessment of the sampling bias, for instance high-speed imaging of the droplet field near the channel exit with size statistics for both populations, a mass-flux-weighted comparison, or PDA measurements at multiple downstream positions, for at least one Boger case and the Newtonian baseline.
  2. [Section IV.B; Figs. 6 and 7] The numerical support for the proposed mechanism is weaker than presented because the simulation parameters are not consistent with the measured rheology. The manuscript states that Π = 0.001 was 'decided after some trial-and-error iterations to best showcase the viscoelastic response of the liquid'. More importantly, an estimate from the characterization data conflicts with that choice: using the polymer viscosity ηp = ηN − ηs (Table I) and the measured relaxation times, the Oldroyd-B modulus G = ηp/λ equals roughly 1.2-6.6 Pa over the concentration range, so Π = G/(ρlU²) ≈ 1-8 × 10⁻⁶ at U = 30 m/s, i.e., two to three orders of magnitude below the simulated value of 10⁻³. Since the paper itself notes that 'too low a value' of Π yields a Newtonian-like response, a simulation at the physically estimated Π would probably not reproduce the strongly viscoelastic thinning reported in Fig. 7b. The Wi comparison is less clear-cut (using the film timescale of Section III.B gives Wi ≈ 0.4, while the droplet radius implicit in We_d = 7.5 Γρ of Section IV.A gives Wi ≈ 10-20), but the Π mismatch is robust to the choice of length scale. The simulations should either adopt rheology-based dimensionless parameters or be explicitly presented as qualitative illustrations, with a sensitivity study over Π spanning the estimated range, and the statement of 'complete agreement with our experimental findings' should be correspondingly qualified.
  3. [Section III.B, Section III.C, and Conclusions] The mechanism advanced in the conclusions, namely that 'thinner bags of comparatively more uniform thickness' produce smaller droplets, has no direct experimental measurement of bag thickness at rupture. The experiments connect polymer concentration to bag length, width, and lifetime (Fig. 3) and to PDA droplet size (Fig. 4), but the intermediate step, the sheet thickness, is inferred rather than measured. This inference is not forced by volume conservation, because the bags remain attached to the liquid film while inflating (Fig. 2a), so their volume is not fixed and larger Lb and Wb do not strictly imply a smaller thickness. The only direct evidence for a thinner and more uniform sheet comes from the simulations whose parameters are questioned in the preceding comment. The authors should measure or estimate the bag thickness for at least one viscoelastic and one Newtonian case (for example by transmitted-light intensity or a calibrated optical method), or explicitly state that the thickness reduction is an inference supported only qualitatively by the simulations and by the capillary-thinning filament data of Fig. 1d.
  4. [Section III.B and Section III.C] The proposed causal chain (higher Cm → larger bags → thinner sheets → smaller droplets) is not monotonic at the upper end of the explored concentration range. At Cm = 1.00% the bags are the largest (Figs. 3a-3b), yet no droplets are detected by the PDA (Section III.C), and at Cm = 0.50% the mean droplet diameter increases relative to Cm = 0.20% (Fig. 4a) while the bags remain larger than in the dilute cases. The paper attributes both departures to shear thinning, but the shear-rate dependence in the atomization range is not measured (Fig. 1c) and no mechanistic account of the reversal is given. The central claim as stated in the abstract and the conclusions is therefore established only for the dilute Boger regime (Cm ≤ 0.20%); the manuscript should either explicitly limit its conclusions to that regime or provide a quantitative explanation of the shear-thinning crossover.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section III.C, Fig. 4a] The mean diameters in Fig. 4a are shown without uncertainty intervals or sample counts; please report the number of validated PDA samples per concentration and add percentile or bootstrap intervals as in Fig. 4b.
  2. [Section III.B] The printed formula for the bag lifetime scale, τf = Hf sqrt(Γρ/U), is dimensionally inconsistent; presumably the intended expression is τf = Hf sqrt(Γρ)/U (as in Ref. 48), and the formula should be corrected.
  3. [Fig. 7b] The color code in Fig. 7b is not decoded in the caption; please list the Wi values corresponding to each curve.
  4. [Section III.C] The attribution of the Cm = 0.50% reversal of the mean droplet diameter to shear thinning is plausible but untested, since the viscosity curves in Fig. 1c do not reach the shear-rate range of the atomization event and no shear-thinning inelastic control fluid is included; the text could note explicitly that the high-shear viscosity in the relevant range is unknown.
  5. [Section II.B and Section V] Because the polymeric solutions have γ = 62 mN/m while the pure-water baseline has γ = 72 mN/m, the film Weber number differs between baseline and polymeric cases (We_f ≈ 17 vs ≈ 15); a sentence acknowledging this small variation would clarify the comparison with the Newtonian data of Kant et al.
  6. [Section IV.A, Eq. (7)] The normalization of σ̂² shown in Fig. 7b is not specified; please state whether it is normalized by the droplet radius squared or by another reference length.
  7. [Fig. 3d] The solid line in Fig. 3d indicates Lb ~ Tb²; please state whether this is a fit to the data or the theoretical law of Ref. 48 with the constant taken from theory.
  8. [Section III.A, Fig. 2] The panel labels of Fig. 2 are inconsistent between the caption (which lists both b-i/ii/iii and d-i/ii/iii) and the text (which refers to 'figure 2b-iii' for the arrow); please harmonize the panel labels and the arrow reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central droplet-size finding is experimentally independent, and the simulation's trial-and-error parameter is a regime choice rather than a fit of the claimed result.

full rationale

The central conclusion that increasing polymer concentration shifts the expelled droplet size distribution to smaller diameters is based on direct PDA measurements (Fig. 4), which are independent of the simulations and of the authors' prior Newtonian study. The numerical part is used to illustrate a mechanism: in Oldroyd-B simulations, higher Wi gives more uniform bag thinning, leading to thinner bags and, through the known thickness-to-droplet-size relation, smaller drops. The elastoinertial number Pi is admittedly chosen by trial-and-error to 'best showcase the viscoelastic response' (Sec. IV.B), but this is a regime selection (too low Pi is Newtonian-like, too high Pi suppresses deformation), not a fitting of the droplet-size outcome; the decrease of the uniformity metric sigma-hat^2 with Wi is an emergent model result. Citations to Kant et al. [36] provide the Newtonian baseline and bag-breakup mechanism from a separate experimental study, and are not used as an unverified axiom. The acknowledged single-point PDA sampling bias at 15 cm (Sec. II.A) is a genuine experimental limitation for comparing Newtonian and viscoelastic sprays, but it is a validity concern, not a circular derivation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation reduces to its own input; hence there is no significant circularity, only minor caveats that do not affect the independent experimental claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard fluid mechanics plus several domain assumptions: the fidelity of PEO as a mucus mimic, the equivalence between the cough-machine film bags and a single axisymmetric droplet, and the thickness-to-droplet-size relation. No new physical entities are introduced. The tuned simulation parameters Pi and Wi are the main free inputs.

free parameters (2)
  • Elastoinertial number Pi = 0.001
    Chosen by trial-and-error in Section IV.B 'to best showcase the viscoelastic response of the liquid'; not derived from experimental data and not varied systematically.
  • Weissenberg number Wi = 1.00
    Selected for the main viscoelastic simulation (Figure 6b) as a representative value where relaxation time is comparable to inertial time; not tied to a specific experimental concentration.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Oldroyd-B model adequately represents the PEO solutions used in the experiments.
    Invoked in Section IV.A for the polymeric stress tensor; standard for dilute polymer solutions, but the experimental fluids also show shear thinning at high Cm, which Oldroyd-B does not capture.
  • domain assumption An axisymmetric droplet in an impulsively started uniform air flow is a faithful surrogate for the sheared film bags in the confined cough-machine channel.
    The simulations use a single droplet geometry (Figure 5) rather than the channel geometry; the transfer of conclusions relies on bag-breakup regime similarity.
  • domain assumption Droplet size produced during bag rupture is set by local liquid sheet thickness, with thinner sheets yielding smaller droplets.
    Used in Section III.C and IV.B to connect bag thinning to droplet size; imported from prior literature (Marmottant and Villermaux, Keshavarz et al.) and not directly measured in this geometry.
  • domain assumption PEO solutions at low concentrations are representative of mucosalivary fluid viscoelasticity.
    Section II.B claims the fluids closely mimic real mucosalivary rheology; real mucus is more complex, including mucin networks and surfactants.
  • domain assumption PDA sampling at 15 cm downstream centerline captures the aerosol population relevant to the claim, despite preferential detection of small droplets.
    Acknowledged in Section II.A and III.C; the measured distribution excludes large droplets that fall out ballistically, and this bias is assumed comparable across fluids.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Viscoelasticity reduces the droplet size in mucosalivary film fragmentation during intense respiratory events." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZV2HH6DQ

@misc{pith2026250205105,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Viscoelasticity reduces the droplet size in mucosalivary film fragmentation during intense respiratory events},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZV2HH6DQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05105}
}
read the original abstract

We examine the fundamental fluid dynamical mechanisms dictating the generation of bioaerosols in the human trachea during intense respiratory events such as coughing and sneezing, with an emphasis on the role played by the mucosalivary fluid viscoelasticity. An experimental investigation of the shear-induced fragmentation of a mucosalivary-mimetic fluid in a confined geometry reveals that viscoelastic liquids undergo atomization in a manner akin to Newtonian liquids -- via the formation of bag-like structures -- which ultimately rupture through the appearance of retracting holes on the bag surface. Droplets are produced via the unstable retraction of liquid rims bounding these holes. However, in comparison to Newtonian liquids, viscoelastic bags inflate to larger sizes -- implying thinner sheets and, consequently smaller droplets upon rupture. Numerical simulations support that the smaller droplets can be attributed to the thinner sheets, with a more uniform thickness, for viscoelastic bags prior to rupture. Hence, we highlight the role of the viscoelasticity in determining the thickness of the intermediate bag-like structures, which, in turn, govern the droplet size distribution of the expelled aerosol.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05105 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Schematic of the axisymmetric numerical domain (to scale), with the boundary conditions specified. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Sequence of interfacial shapes at different dimensionless times, t, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    X. Xie, Y. Li, H. Sun, and L. Liu, Exhaled droplets due to talking and coughing, J. R. Soc. Interface (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Bourouiba, E

    L. Bourouiba, E. Dehandschoewercker, and J. W. M. Bush, Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing, J. Fluid Mech. 745, 537 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    B. E. Scharfman, A. H. Techet, J. W. M. Bush, and L. Bourouiba, Visualization of sneeze ejecta: steps of fluid fragmentation leading to respiratory droplets, Exp. Fluids 57, 1 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Abkarian, S

    M. Abkarian, S. Mendez, N. Xue, F. Yang, and H. A. Stone, Speech can produce jet-like transport relevant to asymptomatic spreading of virus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 25237 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Bourouiba, The fluid dynamics of disease transmission, Annu

    L. Bourouiba, The fluid dynamics of disease transmission, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 473 (2021). 14

    2021

  6. [6]

    Bourrianne, N

    P. Bourrianne, N. Xue, J. Nunes, M. Abkarian, and H. A. Stone, Quantifying the effect of a mask on expiratory flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 110511 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Bourrianne, P

    P. Bourrianne, P. R. Kaneelil, M. Abkarian, and H. A. Stone, Air flows in opera, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024042 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    A. L. Nord, P. Dosset, P. Slangen, and M. Abkarian, Digital in-line holography to explore saliva aerosolization mechanisms in speech, J. Aerosol Sci. 175, 106282 (2024)

    2024

Show all 134 references
  1. [9]

    W. F. Wells and M. W. Wells, Air-borne infection, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 107, 1698 (1936)

    1936

  2. [10]

    R. M. Jones and L. M. Brosseau, Aerosol transmission of infectious disease, J. Occup. Environ. Med. 57, 501 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Fiegel, R

    J. Fiegel, R. Clarke, and D. A. Edwards, Airborne infectious disease and the suppression of pulmonary bioaerosols, Drug Discov. Today 11, 51 (2006)

    2006

  4. [12]

    Bourouiba, A sneeze, New Engl

    L. Bourouiba, A sneeze, New Engl. J. Med. 375, e15 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Abkarian and H

    M. Abkarian and H. A. Stone, Stretching and break-up of saliva filaments during speech: a route for pathogen aerosolization and its potential mitigation, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 102301 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    M. L. P¨ ohlker, C. P¨ ohlker, O. O. Kr¨ uger, J.-D. F¨ orster, T. Berkemeier, W. Elbert, J. Fr¨ ohlich-Nowoisky, U. P¨ oschl, G. Bagheri, E. Bodenschatz, J. A. Huffman, S. Scheithauer, and E. Mikhailov, Respiratory aerosols and droplets in the transmission of infectious disea...

    2023

  7. [15]

    B. T. Gidreta and H. Kim, Effects of physical property changes of expelled respiratory liquid on atomization morphology, J. Fluid Mech. 960, A10 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Bourouiba, Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: potential implications for reducing transmission of COVID-19, J

    L. Bourouiba, Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: potential implications for reducing transmission of COVID-19, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 323, 1837 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Mittal, R

    R. Mittal, R. Ni, and J.-H. Seo, The flow physics of COVID-19, J. Fluid Mech. 894, F2 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    G. A. Somsen, C. van Rijn, S. Kooij, R. A. Bem, and D. Bonn, Small droplet aerosols in poorly ventilated spaces and SARS-CoV-2 transmission, Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 658 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    C. C. Wang, K. A. Prather, J. Sznitman, J. L. Jimenez, S. S. Lakdawala, Z. Tufekci, and L. C. Marr, Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses, Science 373, eabd9149 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    R. Yang, C. S. Ng, K. L. Chong, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Do increased flow rates in displacement ventilation always lead to better results?, J. Fluid Mech. 932, A3 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    R. E. Stockwell, E. L. Ballard, P. O’Rourke, L. D. Knibbs, L. Morawska, and S. C. Bell, Indoor hospital air and the impact of ventilation on bioaerosols: a systematic review, J. Hosp. Infect. 103, 175 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Morawska, J

    L. Morawska, J. W. Tang, W. Bahnfleth, P. M. Bluyssen, A. Boerstra, G. Buonanno, J. Cao, S. Dancer, A. Floto, F. Franchimon, C. Haworth, J. Hogeling, C. Isaxon, J. L. Jimenez, J. Kurnitski, Y. Li, M. Loomans, G. Marks, L. C. Marr, L. Mazzarella, A. K. Melikov, S. Miller, D. K....

    2020

  15. [23]

    Morawska, J

    L. Morawska, J. Allen, W. Bahnfleth, P. M. Bluyssen, A. Boerstra, G. Buonanno, J. Cao, S. J. Dancer, A. Floto, F. Franchimon, T. Greenhalgh, C. Haworth, J. Hogeling, C. Isaxon, J. L. Jimenez, J. Kurnitski, Y. Li, M. Loomans, G. Marks, L. C. Marr, L. Mazzarella, A. K. Melikov, ...

    2021

  16. [24]

    C. S. Ng, K. L. Chong, R. Yang, M. Li, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Growth of respiratory droplets in cold and humid air, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 054303 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    K. L. Chong, C. S. Ng, N. Hori, R. Yang, R. Verzicco, and D. Lohse, Extended lifetime of respiratory droplets in a turbulent vapor puff and its implications on airborne disease transmission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 034502 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    W. F. Wells, On air-borne infection. Study II. Droplets and droplet nuclei, Am. J. Epidemiol. 20, 611 (1934)

    1934

  19. [27]

    J. P. Duguid, The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei, Epidemiol. Infect. 44, 471 (1946)

    1946

  20. [28]

    R. G. Loudon and R. M. Roberts, Relation between the airborne diameters of respiratory droplets and the diameter of the stains left after recovery, Nature 213, 95 (1967)

    1967

  21. [29]

    C. Y. H. Chao, M. P. Wan, L. Morawska, G. R. Johnson, Z. D. Ristovski, M. Hargreaves, K. Mengersen, S. Cor- bett, Y. Li, X. Xie, and D. Katoshevski, Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening, J. Aerosol Sci. 40, 122 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    D. A. Edwards, J. C. Man, P. Brand, J. P. Katstra, K. Sommerer, H. A. Stone, E. Nardell, and G. Scheuch, Inhaling to mitigate exhaled bioaerosols, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 17383 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    Wei and Y

    J. Wei and Y. Li, Airborne spread of infectious agents in the indoor environment, Am. J. Infect. Control 44, S102 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    G. R. Johnson and L. Morawska, The mechanism of breath aerosol formation, J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 22, 229 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Vasudevan and C

    M. Vasudevan and C. F. Lange, Property dependence of onset of instability in viscoelastic respiratory fluids, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 43, 1292 (2005). 15

    2005

  26. [34]

    J. A. Moriarty and J. B. Grotberg, Flow-induced instabilities of a mucus–serous bilayer, J. Fluid Mech. 397, 1 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    L. Morawska, Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection?, in Indoor Air 2005: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate (Tsinghua University Press, 2005) pp. 9–23

    2005

  28. [36]

    P. Kant, C. Pairetti, Y. Saade, S. Popinet, S. Zaleski, and D. Lohse, Bag-mediated film atomization in a cough machine, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 074802 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    M. King, G. Brock, and C. Lundell, Clearance of mucus by simulated cough, J. Appl. Physiol. 58, 1776 (1985)

    1985

  30. [38]

    S. W. Clarke, J. G. Jones, and D. R. Oliver, Resistance to two-phase gas-liquid flow in airways., J. Appl. Physiol. 29, 464 (1970)

    1970

  31. [39]

    Marcotte and S

    F. Marcotte and S. Zaleski, Density contrast matters for drop fragmentation thresholds at low Ohnesorge number, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 103604 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Pairetti, R

    C. Pairetti, R. Villiers, and S. Zaleski, On shear layer atomization within closed channels: Numerical simulations of a cough-replicating experiment, Comput. Fluids 231, 105125 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Kulkarni, C

    Y. Kulkarni, C. Pairetti, R. Villiers, S. Popinet, and S. Zaleski, The atomizing pulsed jet, J. Fluid Mech. 1009, A35 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    N. Shen, Y. Kulkarni, T. Jamin, S. Popinet, S. Zaleski, and L. Bourouiba, Fragmentation from inertial detach- ment of a sessile droplet: implications for pathogen transport, J. Fluid Mech. 1002, A6 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    C. A. Evrensel, M. R. U. Khan, S. Elli, and P. E. Krumpe, Viscous airflow through a rigid tube with a compliant lining: a simple model for the air-mucus interaction in pulmonary airways, J. Biomed. Eng. 115, 262 (1993)

    1993

  36. [44]

    B. Bake, P. Larsson, G. Ljungkvist, E. Ljungstr¨ om, and A.-C. Olin, Exhaled particles and small airways, Respir. Res. 20, 8 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    D. C. Blanchard, The electrification of the atmosphere by particles from bubbles in the sea, Prog. Oceanogr. 1, 73 (1963)

    1963

  38. [46]

    P. J. Basser, T. A. McMahon, and P. Griffith, The mechanism of mucus clearance in cough, J. Biomech. Eng. 111, 288 (1989)

    1989

  39. [47]

    Bremond and E

    N. Bremond and E. Villermaux, Bursting thin liquid films, J. Fluid Mech. 524, 121 (2005)

    2005

  40. [48]

    Villermaux and B

    E. Villermaux and B. Bossa, Single-drop fragmentation determines size distribution of raindrops, Nat. Phys. 5, 697 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Vledouts, J

    A. Vledouts, J. Quinard, N. Vandenberghe, and E. Villermaux, Explosive fragmentation of liquid shells, J. Fluid Mech. 788, 246 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Villermaux, Fragmentation versus cohesion, J

    E. Villermaux, Fragmentation versus cohesion, J. Fluid Mech. 898, P1 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Jalaal and K

    M. Jalaal and K. Mehravaran, Fragmentation of falling liquid droplets in bag breakup mode, Int. J. Multiphase Fl. 47, 115 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    J. O. Hinze, Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes, AIChE J. 1, 289 (1955)

    1955

  45. [53]

    T. G. Theofanous, Aerobreakup of Newtonian and viscoelastic liquids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 661 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    I. M. Jackiw and N. Ashgriz, On aerodynamic droplet breakup, J. Fluid Mech. 913, A33 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    N. K. Chandra, S. Sharma, S. Basu, and A. Kumar, Aerodynamic bag breakup of a polymeric droplet, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 113303 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    D. R. Guildenbecher, C. L´ opez-Rivera, and P. E. Sojka, Secondary atomization, Exp. Fluids 46, 371 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    Zhao, H.-F

    H. Zhao, H.-F. Liu, W.-F. Li, and J.-L. Xu, Morphological classification of low viscosity drop bag breakup in a continuous air jet stream, Phys. Fluids 22, 114103 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    S. A. Krzeczkowski, Measurement of liquid droplet disintegration mechanisms, Int. J. Multiphase Fl. 6, 227 (1980)

    1980

  51. [59]

    L. P. Hsiang and G. M. Faeth, Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup, Int. J. Multiphase Fl. 18, 635 (1992)

    1992

  52. [60]

    Varkevisser, S

    T. Varkevisser, S. Kooij, E. Villermaux, and D. Bonn, Effect of high wind speeds on droplet formation in sprays, J. Fluid Mech. 1000, A86 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Veron, C

    F. Veron, C. Hopkins, E. L. Harrison, and J. A. Mueller, Sea spray spume droplet production in high wind speeds, Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 (2012)

    2012

  54. [62]

    Troitskaya, A

    Y. Troitskaya, A. Kandaurov, O. Ermakova, D. Kozlov, D. Sergeev, and S. Zilitinkevich, Bag-breakup fragmen- tation as the dominant mechanism of sea-spray production in high winds, Sci.Rep. 7, 1614 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Villermaux, X

    E. Villermaux, X. Wang, and L. Deike, Bubbles spray aerosols: Certitudes and mysteries, PNAS Nexus 1, 1 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Deike, Mass transfer at the ocean-atmosphere interface: The role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles, Annu

    L. Deike, Mass transfer at the ocean-atmosphere interface: The role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 191 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    E. P. Vejerano and L. C. Marr, Physico-chemical characteristics of evaporating respiratory fluid droplets, J. R. Soc. Interface 15, 20170939 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Bastola, P

    R. Bastola, P. M. Young, and S. C. Das, Simulation of respiratory tract lining fluid for in vitro dissolution study, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 18, 1091 (2021). 16

    2021

  59. [67]

    Seyfert, J

    C. Seyfert, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Rodr ´ ıguez, D. Lohse, and A. Marin, Stability of respiratory-like droplets under evapo- ration, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 023603 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Anwarul Hasan, C

    M. Anwarul Hasan, C. F. Lange, and M. L. King, Effect of artificial mucus properties on the characteristics of airborne bioaerosol droplets generated during simulated coughing, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 165, 1431 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Hamed, D

    R. Hamed, D. M. Schenck, and J. Fiegel, Surface rheological properties alter aerosol formation from mucus mimetic surfaces, Soft Matter 16, 7823 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    Rodr ´ ıguez-Hakim, L

    M. Rodr ´ ıguez-Hakim, L. R¨ az, and J. Vermant, Variations in human saliva viscoelasticity affect aerosolization propensity, Soft Matter 18, 2528 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    J. W. Hoyt, J. J. Taylor, and C. D. Runge, The structure of jets of water and polymer solution in air, J. Fluid Mech. 63, 635 (1974)

    1974

  64. [72]

    Haessig, M

    C. Haessig, M. Habibi, and U. Sen, Tunable self-emulsification via viscoelastic control of Marangoni-driven interfacial instabilities, arXiv:2504.11021 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    J. D. Wilcox, R. K. June, H. A. Brown Jr., and R. C. Kelley Jr., The retardation of drop breakup in high-velocity airstreams by polymeric modifiers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 5, 1 (1961)

    1961

  66. [74]

    N. K. Chandra, S. Sharma, S. Basu, and A. Kumar, Shock-induced aerobreakup of a polymeric droplet, J. Fluid Mech. 965, A1 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Clasen, J

    C. Clasen, J. Eggers, M. A. Fontelos, J. Li, and G. H. McKinley, The beads-on-string structure of viscoelastic threads, J. Fluid Mech. 556, 283 (2006)

    2006

  68. [76]

    P. P. Bhat, S. Appathurai, M. T. Harris, M. Pasquali, G. H. McKinley, and O. A. Basaran, Formation of beads-on-a-string structures during break-up of viscoelastic filaments, Nat. Phys. 6, 625 (2010)

    2010

  69. [77]

    Keshavarz, E

    B. Keshavarz, E. C. Houze, J. R. Moore, M. R. Koerner, and G. H. McKinley, Ligament mediated fragmentation of viscoelastic liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 154502 (2016)

    2016

  70. [78]

    U. Sen, D. Lohse, and M. Jalaal, Elastocapillary Worthington jets, arXiv:2207.07928 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Albrecht, N

    H.-E. Albrecht, N. Damaschke, M. Borys, and C. Tropea, Laser Doppler and phase Doppler measurement tech- niques (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    H. H. Qiu and M. Sommerfeld, A reliable method for determining the measurement volume size and particle mass fluxes using phase-Doppler anemometry, Exp. Fluids 13, 393 (1992)

    1992

  73. [81]

    Zussman, A

    E. Zussman, A. Yarin, and R. Nagler, Age- and flow-dependency of salivary viscoelasticity, J. Dent. Res. 86, 281 (2007)

    2007

  74. [82]

    S. K. Lai, Y.-Y. Wang, D. Wirtz, and J. Hanes, Micro- and macrorheology of mucus, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61, 86 (2009)

    2009

  75. [83]

    S. J. Haward, J. A. Odell, M. Berry, and T. Hall, Extensional rheology of human saliva, Rheol. Acta 50, 869 (2011)

    2011

  76. [84]

    C. E. Wagner and G. H. McKinley, Age-dependent capillary thinning dynamics of physically-associated salivary mucin networks, J. Rheol. 61, 1309 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    J. D. Berry, M. J. Neeson, R. R. Dagastine, D. Y. C. Chan, and R. F. Tabor, Measurement of surface and interfacial tension using pendant drop tensiometry, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 454, 226 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    C. E. Stauffer, The measurement of surface tension by the pendant drop technique, J. Phys. Chem. 69, 1933 (1965)

    1965

  79. [87]

    F. K. Hansen and G. Rødsrud, Surface tension by pendant drop: I. a fast standard instrument using computer image analysis, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 141, 1 (1991)

    1991

  80. [88]

    D. F. James, Boger fluids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 129 (2009)

    2009

  81. [89]

    Deblais, K

    A. Deblais, K. P. Velikov, and D. Bonn, Pearling instabilities of a viscoelastic thread, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 194501 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Deblais, M

    A. Deblais, M. A. Herrada, J. Eggers, and D. Bonn, Self-similarity in the breakup of very dilute viscoelastic solutions, J. Fluid Mech. 904, R2 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Eggers, M

    J. Eggers, M. A. Herrada, and J. H. Snoeijer, Self-similar breakup of polymeric threads as described by the Oldroyd-B model, J. Fluid Mech. 887, A19 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    U. Sen, C. Datt, T. Segers, H. Wijshoff, J. H. Snoeijer, M. Versluis, and D. Lohse, The retraction of jetted slender viscoelastic filaments, J. Fluid Mech. 929, A25 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    D. W. Bousfield, R. Keunings, G. Marrucci, and M. M. Denn, Nonlinear analysis of the surface tension driven breakup of viscoelastic filaments, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 21, 79 (1986)

    1986

  86. [94]

    S. L. Anna and G. H. McKinley, Elasto-capillary thinning and breakup of model elastic liquids, J. Rheol. 45, 115 (2001)

    2001

  87. [95]

    Scardovelli and S

    R. Scardovelli and S. Zaleski, Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 567 (1999)

    1999

  88. [96]

    Hoepffner, R

    J. Hoepffner, R. Blumenthal, and S. Zaleski, Self-similar wave produced by local perturbation of the Kelvin- Helmholtz shear-layer instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 104502 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Lohse and E

    D. Lohse and E. Villermaux, Double threshold behavior for breakup of liquid sheets, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 18912 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    G. I. Taylor and D. H. Michael, On making holes in a sheet of fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 58, 625 (1973). 17

    1973

  91. [99]

    Villermaux, Fragmentation, Annu

    E. Villermaux, Fragmentation, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 419 (2007)

    2007

  92. [100]

    A. L. Klein, D. Kurilovich, H. Lhuissier, O. O. Versolato, D. Lohse, E. Villermaux, and H. Gelderblom, Drop fragmentation by laser-pulse impact, J Fluid Mech. 893, A7 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    M. S. Bazzi and M. S. Carvalho, Effect of viscoelasticity on liquid sheet rupture, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 264, 107 (2019)

    2019

  94. [102]

    Savva and J

    N. Savva and J. W. M. Bush, Viscous sheet retraction, J. Fluid Mech. 626, 211 (2009)

    2009

  95. [103]

    Lhuissier and E

    H. Lhuissier and E. Villermaux, Bursting bubble aerosols, J. Fluid Mech. 696, 5 (2012)

    2012

  96. [104]

    Sanjay, U

    V. Sanjay, U. Sen, P. Kant, and D. Lohse, Taylor–Culick retractions and the influence of the surroundings, J. Fluid Mech. 948, A14 (2022)

    2022

  97. [105]

    G. Y. Park and G. M. Harrison, Effects of elasticity on the spraying of a non-Newtonian fluid, At. Sprays 18, 243 (2008)

    2008

  98. [106]

    Christanti and L

    Y. Christanti and L. M. Walker, Quantifying air atomization of viscoelastic fluids through fluid relaxation times, At. Sprays 16, 777 (2006)

    2006

  99. [107]

    J. C. Thompson and J. P. Rothstein, The atomization of viscoelastic fluids in flat-fan and hollow-cone spray nozzles, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 147, 11 (2007)

    2007

  100. [108]

    A. M. Karim, W. J. Suszynski, W. B. Griffith, S. Pujari, L. F. Francis, and M. S. Carvalho, Effect of viscoelasticity on stability of liquid curtain, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 257, 83 (2018)

    2018

  101. [109]

    Gaillard, R

    A. Gaillard, R. Sijs, and D. Bonn, What determines the drop size in sprays of polymer solutions?, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 305, 104813 (2022)

    2022

  102. [110]

    I. M. Jackiw and N. Ashgriz, Prediction of the droplet size distribution in aerodynamic droplet breakup, J. Fluid Mech. 940, A17 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    Keshavarz, V

    B. Keshavarz, V. Sharma, E. C. Houze, M. R. Koerner, J. R. Moore, P. M. Cotts, P. Threlfall-Holmes, and G. H. McKinley, Studying the effects of elongational properties on atomization of weakly viscoelastic solutions using Rayleigh Ohnesorge Jetting Extensional Rheometry (ROJER...

    2015

  104. [112]

    Eggers, Universal pinching of 3D axisymmetric free-surface flow, Phys

    J. Eggers, Universal pinching of 3D axisymmetric free-surface flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3458 (1993)

    1993

  105. [113]

    D. T. Papageorgiou, On the breakup of viscous liquid threads, Physics of Fluids 7, 1529 (1995)

    1995

  106. [114]

    Ting and J

    L. Ting and J. B. Keller, Slender jets and thin sheets with surface tension, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50, 1533 (1990)

    1990

  107. [115]

    Amarouchene, D

    Y. Amarouchene, D. Bonn, J. Meunier, and H. Kellay, Inhibition of finite-time singularity during droplet fission of a polymeric fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3558 (2001)

    2001

  108. [116]

    Marmottant and E

    P. Marmottant and E. Villermaux, Fragmentation of stretched liquid ligaments, Phys. Fluids 16, 2732 (2004)

    2004

  109. [117]

    Reyssat, F

    ´E. Reyssat, F. Chevy, A.-L. Biance, L. Petitjean, and D. Qu´ er´ e, Shape and instability of free-falling liquid globules, Europhys. Lett. 80, 34005 (2007)

    2007

  110. [118]

    Kulkarni and P

    V. Kulkarni and P. E. Sojka, Bag breakup of low viscosity drops in the presence of a continuous air jet, Phys. Fluids 26, 072103 (2014)

    2014

  111. [119]

    L. P. Hsiang and G. M. Faeth, Drop deformation and breakup due to shock wave and steady disturbances, Int. J. Multiphase Fl. 21, 545 (1995)

    1995

  112. [120]

    R. B. Bird, C. F. Curtiss, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids (John Wiley & Sons, 1987)

    1987

  113. [121]

    J. G. Oldroyd, On the formulation of rheological equations of state, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 523 (1950)

    1950

  114. [122]

    A. K. Dixit, A. Oratis, K. Zinelis, D. Lohse, and V. Sanjay, Viscoelastic Worthington jets and droplets produced by bursting bubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 1010, A2 (2025)

    2025

  115. [123]

    J. B. Bell, P. Colella, and H. M. Glaz, A second-order projection method for the incompressible navier-stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 85, 257 (1989)

    1989

  116. [124]

    Popinet, A quadtree-adaptive multigrid solver for the Serre–Green–Naghdi equations, J

    S. Popinet, A quadtree-adaptive multigrid solver for the Serre–Green–Naghdi equations, J. Comput. Phys. 302, 336 (2015)

    2015

  117. [125]

    Saade, D

    Y. Saade, D. Lohse, and D. Fuster, A multigrid solver for the coupled pressure-temperature equations in an all-Mach solver with VoF, J. Comput. Phys. 476, 111865 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Fattal and R

    R. Fattal and R. Kupferman, Constitutive laws for the matrix-logarithm of the conformation tensor, J. Non- Newton. Fluid Mech. 123, 281 (2004)

    2004

  119. [127]

    Fattal and R

    R. Fattal and R. Kupferman, Time-dependent simulation of viscoelastic flows at high Weissenberg number using the log-conformation representation, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 126, 23 (2005)

    2005

  120. [128]

    J. M. L´ opez-Herrera, S. Popinet, and A. A. Castrej´ on-Pita, An adaptive solver for viscoelastic incompressible two-phase problems applied to the study of the splashing of weakly viscoelastic droplets, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 264, 144 (2019)

    2019

  121. [129]

    J. U. Brackbill, D. B. Kothe, and C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100, 335 (1992)

    1992

  122. [130]

    Popinet, An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows, J

    S. Popinet, An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5838 (2009)

    2009

  123. [131]

    Popinet, Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries, J

    S. Popinet, Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries, J. Comput. Phys. 190, 572 (2003)

    2003

  124. [132]

    Squire, Investigation of the instability of a moving liquid film, Br

    H. Squire, Investigation of the instability of a moving liquid film, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 4, 167 (1953). 18

    1953

  125. [133]

    Bremond, C

    N. Bremond, C. Clanet, and E. Villermaux, Atomization of undulating liquid sheets, J. Fluid Mech. 585, 421 (2007)

    2007

  126. [134]

    J. Wang, M. Alipour, G. Soligo, A. Roccon, M. De Paoli, F. Picano, and A. Soldati, Short-range exposure to airborne virus transmission and current guidelines, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2105279118 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.