Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Gaussian Models to Non-Gaussian Realms of Quantum Photonic Simulators

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that non-Gaussian states, essential for universal photonic quantum computation, make simulation exponentially harder and push the field toward tensor networks and GPU-accelerated hybrid workflows.

desk verdict Useful survey map of photonic simulators, but the feature tables have enough factual errors that the map cannot be trusted until a full fact-check. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05245 v1 pith:3NNGT3KB submitted 2025-02-07 quant-ph

Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo , Rodrigo Alves Dias , Masoud Darvish Ganji , Camila Martins Saporetti , Leonardo Goliatt This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumphotonicsimulationGaussianstatesnon-Gaussiancontinuous-variablecomputingtensornetworksGPUaccelerationsimulatorsnoisemodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum photonic simulators live on two sides of a mathematical divide. Gaussian states and operations, such as coherent and squeezed states, beam splitters, and phase shifts, can be simulated efficiently through their displacement vector, covariance matrix, and symplectic transformations, with cost that scales polynomially in the number of modes. The review's central argument is that the non-Gaussian states needed for universal quantum computation, including single-photon states, photon-number-resolving detection, and Kerr or cubic-phase gates, break this efficiency: exact descriptions require Fock states or density matrices whose dimension grows exponentially, and Wigner-function negativity rules out efficient classical sampling. From that premise, the paper surveys the leading photonic simulators and their documented capabilities, arguing that scalability of non-Gaussian simulation is the central open problem. It then identifies tensor networks, GPU and TPU acceleration, machine learning, and hybrid quantum-classical workflows as the practical routes to larger-scale photonic simulation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the covariance matrix together with the symplectic group that acts on it. Gaussian simulation works because a $2n \times 2n$ real covariance matrix, updated by symplectic transformations $\sigma \to S\sigma S^T$, replaces the exponentially large Hilbert space. The argument's second half is carried by the breakdown of that object: non-Gaussian states need Fock-basis amplitudes, density matrices of dimension $d^2$, or phase-space Wigner functions that take negative values, and the paper uses tensor networks and GPU-accelerated tensor contractions as the proposed mechanism to compress the resulting cost.

What would settle it

Run a standardized non-Gaussian circuit, such as photon subtraction on a squeezed state followed by homodyne detection, on each simulator under identical mode counts and error tolerances; if the documented tensor-network or GPU-acceleration support does not translate into smaller runtime or memory use, the review's capability ranking fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper tries to establish that the Gaussian-to-non-Gaussian transition is the organizing tension of photonic quantum simulation. On the Gaussian side, a state is fully characterized by its first and second moments, and every Gaussian operation acts as a symplectic transformation on the covariance matrix, making large systems tractable. The paper argues that universality demands non-Gaussian resources, and that every such resource, a single photon, photon subtraction, a resolving detector, or a nonlinear gate, forces a representation in Fock space, a density matrix, or a negative Wigner function, each of which grows exponentially in size. The review then claims that current simulators differ mainly in how far they extend past the Gaussian boundary, in which hardware accelerators they exploit, and in how faithfully they model photon loss and dark counts. Its conclusion is that no existing tool solves the scalability bottleneck for large non-Gaussian circuits, and that progress will come from tensor networks, HPC acceleration, machine learning, and tighter links between circuit-level and device-level modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The review's comparative tables take the documented features and reported popularity percentages of each simulator at face value, because the authors did not install, run, or independently benchmark any of the tools.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Gaussian/non-Gaussian divide is real, any simulator aiming at universal photonic computation must handle non-Gaussian states explicitly, and its scalability is set by that handling rather than by Gaussian circuit size.
  • Tensor-network representations and GPU/HPC acceleration are the most plausible near-term route to simulating larger non-Gaussian circuits, since they compress weakly entangled states and parallelize tensor contractions.
  • Photon loss and dark counts degrade non-Gaussian states more than Gaussian ones, so noise modeling and error mitigation are prerequisites for credible non-Gaussian simulation.
  • Hybrid quantum-classical workflows inherit the non-Gaussian bottleneck whenever the quantum part includes photon-number-resolving or nonlinear elements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct benchmark of the same non-Gaussian circuit across simulators would turn the review's feature tables into testable performance claims; no such benchmark is reported in the paper.
  • The same argument suggests an algorithmic target: simulators that dynamically choose between covariance-matrix, Fock, and tensor-network representations depending on the local non-Gaussianity of each mode could go well beyond any single fixed representation.
  • If Wigner negativity is the true obstruction, sampling-based methods that work for non-negative Wigner states cannot be lifted to the universal regime without additional structure, so approximate methods must be validated against exact small instances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of quantum photonic simulation software and techniques, with emphasis on the transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian models. It covers foundational material (Gaussian states, non-Gaussian states, continuous-variable frameworks, noise and decoherence, hybrid quantum-classical workflows) and then provides a comparative evaluation of eight photonic simulators (Strawberry Fields, Ansys Lumerical, Piquasso, QuTiP, SimulaQron, Perceval, QuantumOptics.jl, Synopsys Photonic Solutions) in several tables. The paper also discusses hardware acceleration (GPUs, TPUs, SoCs), tensor networks, machine learning, and future directions.

Significance. If its comparative evaluation were accurate, the paper would be a useful reference for practitioners selecting a photonic simulator and for researchers interested in the computational challenges of non-Gaussian photonic simulation. The survey covers a timely topic and brings together a broad set of tools. However, the value is conditional on the correctness and verifiability of the feature tables, which currently contain a clear factual error (Perceval misclassified as CV) and unverifiable popularity figures. The paper does not present new derivations or reproducible benchmarks, so its contribution is entirely the quality of the survey; that quality is at present not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1, Tables 1, 2, and 5] The Perceval feature entries contradict the paper's own reference [61], whose title is 'Perceval: A software platform for discrete variable photonic quantum computing.' Table 1 lists 'Displacement' as a Perceval Gaussian gate; Table 2 lists 'CV and DV states, hybrid states' and homodyne detection; Table 5 labels Perceval's quantum model as 'CV.' Perceval is a discrete-variable single-photon platform and does not offer squeezed/displaced CV states or homodyne measurement. This misclassification is load-bearing because the paper's central contribution is the comparative feature matrix.
  2. [Section 3.2, Table 3] The 'Popularity (% Engagement)' column (e.g., Strawberry Fields 40%, Piquasso 10-15%, Perceval 20%) is presented without any source, definition, or date. 'Engagement' is undefined, and no measurement methodology (e.g., GitHub stars, downloads, citations, user survey) is provided. These numbers are unverifiable and should be removed or replaced by a documented citation.
  3. [Section 3.1-3.3, Tables 1-5] The comparative evaluation lacks a stated methodology: no software versions, no test circuits or benchmarks, and no report of any installation or execution are provided. The text does not explain how the capabilities (e.g., 'TPU Support: ✓ Experimental' for QuantumOptics.jl in Table 5) were determined. A short methods paragraph with version pinning and sources for each row is necessary for the survey to be reproducible.
  4. [Section 2.5.2, Eqs. (26) and (27)] The photon-loss Kraus operator is incorrect as written. In Eq. (26), the subscript is inconsistent (K_n vs K_k) and the factors (1-η)^k η^{n-k} should carry square roots; Eq. (27) has a malformed summation ('X k = 0n') and should be rewritten with a clear sum over the correct index. These errors affect the noise-modeling presentation that is part of the paper's claimed scope.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'QuTiP SimulaQron' should be 'QuTiP, SimulaQron' (missing comma).
  2. [Table 2] In the Ansys Lumerical row, the citation appears as 'citean-sysfdtd' rather than a numbered reference; it should be [59].
  3. [Abstract and Tables 3, 5] The simulator name is spelled inconsistently: 'QuantumOPtics.jl' (Abstract, Table 3) vs 'QuantumOptics.jl' (Table 5).
  4. [Reference [76]] Reference [76] (paracetamol removal using PES/GO membranes) appears to be irrelevant to quantum error mitigation; please check the citation.
  5. [Figure 1] The text says the X8 chip acts as an '8-qubit processor'; Xanadu's X8 is an 8-qumode continuous-variable device, so 'qubit' is inaccurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; minor non-load-bearing self-citation only.

full rationale

This manuscript is a survey/review, not a derivation paper. It introduces no fitted parameters, makes no quantitative predictions, and performs no numerical experiments whose outputs could be pre-supplied by an input. The central claim—that non-Gaussian states add computational complexity and that simulators differ in CV/DV support, hardware acceleration, and noise modeling—is supported by standard textbook equations (Wigner functions, covariance matrices, symplectic transformations, Kraus operators) and by external references to the simulators' documentation and primary papers. The only self-citation is reference [25] (Wayo et al., 'Linear optics to scalable photonic quantum computing'), used in Section 2.1 as a background pointer for the sentence 'Quantum photonic computing [25] relies on the quantum states of light to encode, manipulate, and process information.' That sentence is generic and not load-bearing for any of the paper's survey conclusions. The comparative tables (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 5) are not independently verified and may contain classification inaccuracies, but this is a correctness and verifiability concern, not circularity: the tables do not define or derive the claims they tabulate. No equation in the paper reduces to another equation by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified; the score reflects only the minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters and no new entities. Its claims rest on standard quantum optics facts and on the accuracy of its reading of simulator documentation. The unsupported popularity metric is a data-provenance gap, not an invented physical entity.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard formulas for Gaussian states, Wigner functions, symplectic dynamics, and noise channels are reproduced correctly.
    Section 2 relies on textbook material without derivation. These are accepted background results, though some are misprinted in the text.
  • domain assumption The feature tables (Tables 1-3) accurately reflect the current capabilities of each simulator as documented by its developers.
    The review's comparative evaluation rests on unverified documentation. No simulator was run and the popularity percentages have no stated source.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gaussian Models to Non-Gaussian Realms of Quantum Photonic Simulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3NNGT3KB

@misc{pith2026250205245,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gaussian Models to Non-Gaussian Realms of Quantum Photonic Simulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3NNGT3KB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05245}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum photonic simulators have emerged as indispensable tools for modeling and optimizing quantum photonic circuits, bridging the gap between theoretical models and experimental implementations. This review explores the landscape of photonic quantum simulation, focusing on the transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian models and the computational challenges associated with simulating large-scale photonic systems. Gaussian states and operations, which enable efficient simulations through covariance matrices and phase-space representations, serve as the foundation for photonic quantum computing. However, non-Gaussian states crucial for universal quantum computation introduce significant computational complexity, requiring advanced numerical techniques such as tensor networks and high-performance GPU acceleration. We evaluate the leading photonic quantum simulators, including Strawberry Fields, Piquasso, QuTiP SimulaQron, Perceval, and QuantumOPtics.jl analyzing their capabilities in handling continuous-variable (CV) and discrete-variable (DV) quantum systems. Special attention is given to hardware-accelerated methods, including GPU-based tensor network approaches, machine learning integration, and hybrid quantum-classical workflows. Furthermore, we investigate noise modeling techniques, such as photon loss and dark counts, and their impact on simulation accuracy. As photonic quantum computing moves toward practical implementations, advancements in high-performance computing (HPC) architectures, such as tensor processing units (TPUs) and system-on-a-chip (SoC) solutions, are accelerating the field. This review highlights emerging trends, challenges, and future directions for developing scalable and efficient photonic quantum simulators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DifGa: Differentiable Error Mitigation for Multi-Mode Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Noise in Quantum Photonic Circuits

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Trainable Gaussian rotations and displacements can cancel loss-induced shifts of quadrature means in simulated photonic circuits, with modest robustness gains against modeled phase jitter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [25]

    Linear Optics to Scalable Photonic Quantum Computing

    Wayo, D.D.K., Goliatt, L., Ganji, D.: Linear optics to scalable photonic quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02513 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2501.02513

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02513 2025

  2. [61]

    Quantum 7, 931 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931

    Heurtel, N., Fyrillas, A., De Gliniasty, G., Le Bihan, R., Malherbe, S., Pailhas, M., Bertasi, E., Bourdoncle, B., Emeriau, P.-E., Mezher, R., et al.: Perceval: A software platform for discrete variable photonic quantum computing. Quantum 7, 931 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931

    doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931 2023

  3. [1]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467–488 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467–488 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    doi:10.1007/bf02650179 1982

  4. [2]

    IEEE Spectrum (2021)

    Choi, C.Q.: In the race to hundreds of qubits, photons may have ’quantum advantage’. IEEE Spectrum (2021). Accessed: 2025-02-01

    2021

  5. [3]

    Nature physics 8(4), 285–291 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2253

    Aspuru-Guzik, A., Walther, P.: Photonic quantum simulators. Nature physics 8(4), 285–291 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2253

    doi:10.1038/nphys2253 2012

  6. [4]

    Quantum 3, 129 (2019) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129

    Killoran, N., Izaac, J., Quesada, N., Bergholm, V., Amy, M., Weedbrook, C.: Strawberry fields: A software platform for photonic quantum computing. Quantum 3, 129 (2019) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129

    doi:10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129 2019

  7. [5]

    QuTiP: Visualization of Quantum States and Processes. (2015). In QuTiP 3.1.0 documentation. https://qutip.org/docs/3.1.0/guide/guide-visualization.html Accessed 2025-01-13

    2015

  8. [6]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 86(1), 153–185 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153

    Georgescu, I.M., Ashhab, S., Nori, F.: Quantum simulation. Reviews of Modern Physics 86(1), 153–185 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 2014

Show all 125 references
  1. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.04006

    Kolarovszki, Z., Rybotycki, T., Rakyta, P., Kaposi, ´A., Po´ or, B., J´ oczik, S., Nagy, D.T., Varga, H., El-Safty, K.H., Morse, G.,et al.: Piquasso: A photonic quantum computer simulation software platform. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv...

    2024 doi arXiv

  2. [8]

    Science 326(5949), 108–111 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177838

    Buluta, I., Nori, F.: Quantum simulators. Science 326(5949), 108–111 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177838

    2009 doi

  3. [9]

    Nature Communications 15(1), 2123 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9

    Fauseweh, B.: Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum comput- ers: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Nature Communications 15(1), 2123 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9

    2024 doi

  4. [10]

    Physical Review A 100(5), 052301 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052301

    Su, D., Myers, C.R., Sabapathy, K.K.: Conversion of gaussian states to non- gaussian states using photon-number-resolving detectors. Physical Review A 100(5), 052301 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052301

    2019 doi

  5. [11]

    Physics reports 448(1-4), 1–111 (2007) https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005

    Wang, X.-B., Hiroshima, T., Tomita, A., Hayashi, M.: Quantum information with gaussian states. Physics reports 448(1-4), 1–111 (2007) https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005

    2007

  6. [12]

    PRX quantum 2(3), 030204 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030204

    Walschaers, M.: Non-gaussian quantum states and where to find them. PRX quantum 2(3), 030204 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030204

    2021 doi

  7. [13]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 87(4), 042308 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042308 36

    Filip, R.: Gaussian quantum adaptation of non-gaussian states for a lossy chan- nel. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 87(4), 042308 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042308 36

    2013 doi

  8. [14]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 130(1), 193–205 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1051/aas:1998221

    Blinnikov, S., Moessner, R.: Expansions for nearly gaussian distributions. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 130(1), 193–205 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1051/aas:1998221

    1998 doi

  9. [15]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(11), 1318– 1323 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/34.888716

    Carreira-Perpinan, M.A.: Mode-finding for mixtures of gaussian distributions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(11), 1318– 1323 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/34.888716

    2000 doi

  10. [16]

    Chhikara, R.S., Folks, J.L.: The Inverse Gaussian Distribution: Theory, Method- ology, and Applications, p. 232. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1988). https: //books.google.com.my/books/about/The Inverse Gaussian Distribution.html ?id=bGyHxrEALI0C&redir esc=y

    1988

  11. [17]

    Progress in Quantum Electronics 83, 100395 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantel ec.2022.100395

    Lachman, L., Filip, R.: Quantum non-gaussianity of light and atoms. Progress in Quantum Electronics 83, 100395 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantel ec.2022.100395

    2022

  12. [18]

    Physical Review A 109(5), 052412 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052412

    Jha, R.G., Ringer, F., Siopsis, G., Thompson, S.: Continuous-variable quantum computation of the o (3) model in 1+ 1 dimensions. Physical Review A 109(5), 052412 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052412

    2024 doi

  13. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12365 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12365

    Matsuura, T., Menicucci, N.C., Yamasaki, H.: Continuous-variable fault-tolerant quantum computation under general noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12365 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12365

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [20]

    In: 2024 15th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp

    Haque, A.U., Cho, J., Shin, H.: Continuous-variable quantum k-means cluster- ing with photonic gaussian states. In: 2024 15th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 500–505 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC62082.2024.108...

    2024

  15. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968 (2018) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.04968

    Bergholm, V., Izaac, J., Schuld, M., Gogolin, C., Ahmed, S., Ajith, V., Alam, M.S., Alonso-Linaje, G., AkashNarayanan, B., Asadi, A., et al.: Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968 (2018) https://doi.org/1...

    2018 doi arXiv

  16. [22]

    IEEE Access 11, 137115–137124 (2023) https://doi.org/10.110 9/ACCESS.2023.3338724

    Puspaduhita, A., Surawijaya, A., Anshori, I.: Optical characteristic measurement of micro/nanodroplet on embedded grating nanostructure for digital microflu- idic’s electrode. IEEE Access 11, 137115–137124 (2023) https://doi.org/10.110 9/ACCESS.2023.3338724

    2023

  17. [23]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380(2216), 20210069 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1098/rs ta.2021.0069

    Zohar, E.: Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, challenges and methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380(2216), 20210069 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1098/rs ta.2021.0069

    2022

  18. [24]

    PRX quantum4(2), 027001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001

    Bauer, C.W., Davoudi, Z., Balantekin, A.B., Bhattacharya, T., Carena, M., De Jong, W.A., Draper, P., El-Khadra, A., Gemelke, N., Hanada, M., et al.: 37 Quantum simulation for high-energy physics. PRX quantum4(2), 027001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001

    2023 doi

  19. [26]

    Phys- ical Review A 110(2), 022404 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.0 22404

    Anai, K., Ikehara, S., Yano, Y., Okuno, D., Takeda, S.: Continuous-variable quantum kernel method on a programmable photonic quantum processor. Phys- ical Review A 110(2), 022404 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.0 22404

    2024 doi

  20. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06580 (2024) https://doi.or g/10.48550/arXiv.2405.06580

    Bangar, S., Sunny, L., Yeter-Aydeniz, K., Siopsis, G.: Continuous-variable quan- tum boltzmann machine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06580 (2024) https://doi.or g/10.48550/arXiv.2405.06580

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [28]

    Physical Review X 14(1), 011013 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011013

    Iosue, J.T., Sharma, K., Gullans, M.J., Albert, V.V.: Continuous-variable quan- tum state designs: theory and applications. Physical Review X 14(1), 011013 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011013

    2024 doi

  22. [29]

    Physical Review A 110(5), 052613 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052613

    Zhang, Y.-F., Liu, W.-B., Li, B.-H., Yin, H.-L., Chen, Z.-B.: Continuous-variable quantum digital signatures that can withstand coherent attacks. Physical Review A 110(5), 052613 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052613

    2024 doi

  23. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02905 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02905

    Shaikh, R.A., Yeh, L., Gogioso, S.: The focked-up zx calculus: Picturing continuous-variable quantum computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02905 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02905

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [31]

    Quantum 8, 1382 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-06-20-1382

    Kish, S.P., Gleeson, P.J., Walsh, A., Lam, P.K., Assad, S.M.: Comparison of discrete variable and continuous variable quantum key distribution protocols with phase noise in the thermal-loss channel. Quantum 8, 1382 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-06-20-1382

    2024 doi

  25. [32]

    Physical review letters 97(11), 110501 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe vLett.97.110501

    Menicucci, N.C., Van Loock, P., Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Ralph, .f.T.C., Nielsen, M.A.: Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states. Physical review letters 97(11), 110501 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe vLett.97.110501

    2006 doi

  26. [33]

    In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pp

    Feng, Q.-Y., Cao, G.-C., Chen, H.-X., Xu, Q.-C., Mu, T.-J., Martin, R., Hu, S.-M.: Evsplitting: an efficient and visually consistent splitting algorithm for 3d gaussian splatting. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pp. 1–11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3680528.3687592

    2024

  27. [34]

    Physics Letters A 504, 129431 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129431 38

    Souza, L.A.: Classes of gaussian states for squeezing estimation. Physics Letters A 504, 129431 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129431 38

    2024

  28. [35]

    Computer Physics Communications 280, 108471 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108471

    Brand˜ ao, I., Tandeitnik, D., Guerreiro, T.: Qugit: A numerical toolbox for gaus- sian quantum states. Computer Physics Communications 280, 108471 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108471

    2022

  29. [36]

    Symmetry 14(7), 1286 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071286

    Cariolaro, G., Corvaja, R., Miatto, F.: Gaussian states: Evaluation of the covari- ance matrix from the implementation with primitive component. Symmetry 14(7), 1286 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071286

    2022 doi

  30. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11063 (2020) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.11063

    Garcia-Chung, A.: On the covariance matrix for gaussian states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11063 (2020) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.11063

    2020 doi arXiv

  31. [38]

    Physical review letters 86(16), 3658 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3658

    Werner, R.F., Wolf, M.M.: Bound entangled gaussian states. Physical review letters 86(16), 3658 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3658

    2001 doi

  32. [39]

    Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025)

    Xanadu Quantum Technologies: States - Strawberry Fields Documentation. Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025). https://strawberryfields.ai/photonics/conventions /states.html

    2025

  33. [40]

    Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical 58(3), 035303 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8 121/ada1b2

    Miller, H.J.: Curvature of gaussian quantum states. Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical 58(3), 035303 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8 121/ada1b2

    2025 doi

  34. [41]

    Annals of Physics 176(1), 1–21 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-491 6(87)90176-X

    Wootters, W.K.: A wigner-function formulation of finite-state quantum mechan- ics. Annals of Physics 176(1), 1–21 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-491 6(87)90176-X

    1987 doi

  35. [42]

    New Journal of Physics 15(1), 013037 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-263 0/15/1/013037

    Veitch, V., Wiebe, N., Ferrie, C., Emerson, J.: Efficient simulation scheme for a class of quantum optics experiments with non-negative wigner representation. New Journal of Physics 15(1), 013037 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-263 0/15/1/013037

    2013 doi

  36. [43]

    Applied Physics Reviews 5(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046663

    Weinbub, J., Ferry, D.: Recent advances in wigner function approaches. Applied Physics Reviews 5(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046663

    2018 doi

  37. [44]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics 63(2), 40 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05549-3

    Feng, L., Luo, S.: Connecting continuous and discrete wigner functions via gkp encoding. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 63(2), 40 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05549-3

    2024 doi

  38. [45]

    Physical Review A 106(5), 052206 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1 103/PhysRevA.106.052206

    Linowski, T., Teretenkov, A., Rudnicki, L.: Dissipative evolution of quantum gaussian states. Physical Review A 106(5), 052206 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1 103/PhysRevA.106.052206

    2022

  39. [46]

    Communications Physics 4(1), 53 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00556-w 39

    Nokkala, J., Mart ´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R., Giorgi, G.L., Parigi, V., Soriano, M.C., Zam- brini, R.: Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide universal and versatile reservoir computing. Communications Physics 4(1), 53 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-0...

    2021 doi

  40. [47]

    Physical Review A 100(2), 022341 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.1 00.022341

    Quesada, N., Helt, L.G., Izaac, J., Arrazola, J.M., Shahrokhshahi, R., Myers, C.R., Sabapathy, K.K.: Simulating realistic non-gaussian state preparation. Physical Review A 100(2), 022341 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.1 00.022341

    2019 doi

  41. [48]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 76(4), 042327 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042327

    Genoni, M.G., Paris, M.G., Banaszek, K.: Measure of the non-gaussian character of a quantum state. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 76(4), 042327 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042327

    2007 doi

  42. [49]

    Nature Physics 16(2), 144–147 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0746-6

    Ra, Y.-S., Dufour, A., Walschaers, M., Jacquard, C., Michel, T., Fabre, C., Treps, N.: Non-gaussian quantum states of a multimode light field. Nature Physics 16(2), 144–147 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0746-6

    2020 doi

  43. [50]

    Physical Review Letters 87(5), 050402 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402

    Lvovsky, A.I., Hansen, H., Aichele, T., Benson, O., Mlynek, J., Schiller, S.: Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon fock state. Physical Review Letters 87(5), 050402 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402

    2001 doi

  44. [51]

    Optics express 28(10), 14839–14849 (2020) https://doi.or g/10.1364/OE.389619

    Provazn ´ ık, J., Lachman, L., Filip, R., Marek, P.: Benchmarking photon number resolving detectors. Optics express 28(10), 14839–14849 (2020) https://doi.or g/10.1364/OE.389619

    2020 doi

  45. [52]

    Physical Review Research 6(2), 023332 (2024) https://doi.or g/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023332

    Budinger, N., Furusawa, A., Loock, P.: All-optical quantum computing using cubic phase gates. Physical Review Research 6(2), 023332 (2024) https://doi.or g/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023332

    2024 doi

  46. [53]

    Physical Review A 98(1), 012319 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012319

    Fan, L., Zubairy, M.S.: Quantum illumination using non-gaussian states gen- erated by photon subtraction and photon addition. Physical Review A 98(1), 012319 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012319

    2018 doi

  47. [54]

    Strocchi, F.: Fock Representation, pp. 79–85. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62166-0 12

    2021 doi

  48. [55]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 32(2), 335 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.32.335

    McWeeny, R.: Some recent advances in density matrix theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 32(2), 335 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.32.335

    1960 doi

  49. [56]

    Soviet Physics Uspekhi 26(4), 311 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1983v026n04ABEH004 345

    Tatarski, V.: The wigner representation of quantum mechanics. Soviet Physics Uspekhi 26(4), 311 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1983v026n04ABEH004 345

    1983 doi

  50. [57]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57(43), 435306 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad8198

    Ohst, T.-A., Pl´ avala, M.: Symmetries and wigner representations of operational theories. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 57(43), 435306 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad8198

    2024 doi

  51. [58]

    Physical review letters 120(23), 230502 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.230502 40

    Wang, H., Li, W., Jiang, X., He, Y.-M., Li, Y.-H., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Qin, J., Peng, C.-Z., Schneider, C., et al.: Toward scalable boson sampling with photon loss. Physical review letters 120(23), 230502 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.230502 40

    2018

  52. [59]

    Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025)

    Ansys: FDTD - Ansys Optics. Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025). https://www.ansy s.com/products/optics/fdtd

    2025

  53. [60]

    Quantum Science and Technology 4(1), 015001 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aad56e

    Dahlberg, A., Wehner, S.: Simulaqron—a simulator for developing quantum internet software. Quantum Science and Technology 4(1), 015001 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aad56e

    2018 doi

  54. [62]

    jl: A julia framework for simulating open quantum systems

    Kr¨ amer, S., Plankensteiner, D., Ostermann, L., Ritsch, H.: Quantumoptics. jl: A julia framework for simulating open quantum systems. Computer Physics Communications 227, 109–116 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.00 4

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025)

    Synopsys, Inc.: Photonic Solutions — Synopsys. Accessed: 2025-01-25 (2025). https://www.synopsys.com/photonic-solutions.html

    2025

  56. [64]

    Physical review letters 119(17), 170501 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.170501

    Hamilton, C.S., Kruse, R., Sansoni, L., Barkhofen, S., Silberhorn, C., Jex, I.: Gaussian boson sampling. Physical review letters 119(17), 170501 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.170501

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Science Bulletin 64(8), 511–515 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.007

    Zhong, H.-S., Peng, L.-C., Li, Y., Hu, Y., Li, W., Qin, J., Wu, D., Zhang, W., Li, H., Zhang, L., et al.: Experimental gaussian boson sampling. Science Bulletin 64(8), 511–515 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.007

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    Physical Review A 50(4), 3295 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3295

    Hall, M.J.: Gaussian noise and quantum-optical communication. Physical Review A 50(4), 3295 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3295

    1994 doi

  59. [67]

    Physical Review Letters 120(26), 260504 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett

    Yan, F., Campbell, D., Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Kim, D., Yoder, J.L., Hover, D., Sears, A., Kerman, A.J., Orlando, T.P., et al.: Distinguishing coherent and thermal photon noise in a circuit quantum electrodynamical system. Physical Review Letters 120(26), 260504 (2018) htt...

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    Physical Review Letters 113(22), 223603 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.223603

    Straka, I., Predojevi´ c, A., Huber, T., Lachman, L., Butschek, L., Mikov´ a, M., Miˇ cuda, M., Solomon, G.S., Weihs, G., Jeˇ zek, M.,et al.: Quantum non-gaussian depth of single-photon states. Physical Review Letters 113(22), 223603 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett....

    2014 doi

  61. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07153 (2024) https://doi.or g/10.48550/arXiv.2405.07153 41

    Gao, S., Chaudhary, M., Pyrkov, A.N., Ilo-Okeke, E.O., Meng, X., Feng, J., Khan, M.J., Byners, T., Lou, C.: Photon loss effects on light-mediated non- gaussian entangled bose-einstein condensates projecting with different photon measurement outcomes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405....

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Optics Express 29(16), 25922–25944 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE .433798

    Li, J., Ye, D., Fu, K., Wang, L., Piao, J., Wang, Y.: Single-photon detection for mimo underwater wireless optical communication enabled by arrayed leds and sipms. Optics Express 29(16), 25922–25944 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE .433798

    2021 doi

  63. [71]

    IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 15(2), 545–548 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TASC.2005.849914

    Kitaygorsky, J., Zhang, J., Verevkin, A., Sergeev, A., Korneev, A., Matvienko, V., Kouminov, P., Smirnov, K., Voronov, B., Gol’tsman, G., et al.: Origin of dark counts in nanostructured nbn single-photon detectors. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 15(2), 545–548 ...

    2005

  64. [72]

    Physical Review Research 6(3), 033337 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearc h.6.033337

    Vischi, M., Di Bartolomeo, G., Proietti, M., Koudia, S., Cerocchi, F., Dispenza, M., Bassi, A.: Simulating photonic devices with noisy optical elements. Physical Review Research 6(3), 033337 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearc h.6.033337

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    In: 2022 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architec- ture (HPCA), pp

    Ravi, G.S., Smith, K.N., Gokhale, P., Mari, A., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., Chong, F.T.: Vaqem: A variational approach to quantum error mitigation. In: 2022 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architec- ture (HPCA), pp. 288–303 (2022). https://doi.org...

    2022

  66. [74]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 95(4), 045005 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

    Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Huggins, W.J., Li, Y., McClean, J.R., O’Brien, T.E.: Quantum error mitigation. Reviews of Modern Physics 95(4), 045005 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    Quantum 7, 1034 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-06-06-1 034

    Bultrini, D., Gordon, M.H., Czarnik, P., Arrasmith, A., Cerezo, M., Coles, P.J., Cincio, L.: Unifying and benchmarking state-of-the-art quantum error mitigation techniques. Quantum 7, 1034 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-06-06-1 034

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    Journal of Engineering Research (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.11.011

    Ntone, E.P.N., Abd Rahman, S., Samah, R.A., Alsalhy, Q.F.: Enhanced parac- etamol removal using pes/go mixed matrix membranes: A study on synthesis, characterization, and performance evaluation. Journal of Engineering Research (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.11.011

    2024 doi

  69. [77]

    Physical Review X 8(3), 031027 (2018) https://doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevX.8.031027

    Endo, S., Benjamin, S.C., Li, Y.: Practical quantum error mitigation for near- future applications. Physical Review X 8(3), 031027 (2018) https://doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevX.8.031027

    2018

  70. [78]

    Chinese Physics B 31(9), 090306 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ac 7b1e

    Qin, D., Xu, X., Li, Y.: An overview of quantum error mitigation formulas. Chinese Physics B 31(9), 090306 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ac 7b1e

    2022 doi

  71. [79]

    PRX Quantum 2(4), 040330 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.2.040330 42

    Strikis, A., Qin, D., Chen, Y., Benjamin, S.C., Li, Y.: Learning-based quantum error mitigation. PRX Quantum 2(4), 040330 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.2.040330 42

    2021

  72. [80]

    Physical review letters 118(15), 150503 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.150503

    Li, J., Yang, X., Peng, X., Sun, C.-P.: Hybrid quantum-classical approach to quantum optimal control. Physical review letters 118(15), 150503 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.150503

    2017 doi

  73. [81]

    Nature Reviews Physics 3(9), 625–644 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J.R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Variational quan- tum algorithms. Nature Reviews Physics 3(9), 625–644 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06421 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2407.06421

    Perez-Ramirez, D.F.: Variational quantum algorithms for combinatorial opti- mization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06421 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2407.06421

    2024 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    Physical Review Letters 127(4), 040501 (2021) https://doi.or g/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.040501

    Yuan, X., Sun, J., Liu, J., Zhao, Q., Zhou, Y.: Quantum simulation with hybrid tensor networks. Physical Review Letters 127(4), 040501 (2021) https://doi.or g/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.040501

    2021 doi

  76. [84]

    IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 1, 1–17 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2020.2981074

    Bertels, K., Sarkar, A., Hubregtsen, T., Serrao, M., Mouedenne, A.A., Yadav, A., Krol, A., Ashraf, I., Almudever, C.G.: Quantum computer architecture toward full-stack quantum accelerators. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 1, 1–17 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.202...

    2020

  77. [85]

    Future Generation Computer Systems 161, 11–25 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.06 .058

    Beck, T., Baroni, A., Bennink, R., Buchs, G., P´ erez, E.A.C., Eisenbach, M., Silva, R.F., Meena, M.G., Gottiparthi, K., Groszkowski, P., et al.: Integrating quantum computing resources into scientific hpc ecosystems. Future Generation Computer Systems 161, 11–25 (2024) https:...

    2024 doi

  78. [86]

    Physical Review Letters133(23), 230601 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.230601

    Masot-Llima, S., Garcia-Saez, A.: Stabilizer tensor networks: universal quantum simulator on a basis of stabilizer states. Physical Review Letters133(23), 230601 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.230601

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    Accessed: 2025-02-02 (2025)

    Prabhakar, A.: AI Hardware Innovations: GPUs, TPUs, and Emerging Neuro- morphic and Photonic Chips Driving Machine Learning. Accessed: 2025-02-02 (2025). https://ajithp.com/2025/01/01/ai-hardware-innovations-gpus-tpus-a nd-emerging-neuromorphic-and-photonic-chips-driving-machi...

    2025

  80. [88]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14860 (2023) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14860

    Faj, J., Peng, I., Wahlgren, J., Markidis, S.: Quantum computer simula- tions at warp speed: Assessing the impact of gpu acceleration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14860 (2023) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14860

    2023 doi arXiv

  81. [89]

    Computer physics communications 278, 108411 (2022) https://doi

    Willsch, D., Willsch, M., Jin, F., Michielsen, K., De Raedt, H.: Gpu-accelerated simulations of quantum annealing and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Computer physics communications 278, 108411 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108411

    2022

  82. [90]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), vol

    Bayraktar, H., Charara, A., Clark, D., Cohen, S., Costa, T., Fang, Y.-L.L., Gao, 43 Y., Guan, J., Gunnels, J., Haidar, A.,et al.: cuquantum sdk: A high-performance library for accelerating quantum science. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Enginee...

    2023

  83. [91]

    ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 5(4), 1–26 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1145/3696465

    Pan, F., Gu, H., Kuang, L., Liu, B., Zhang, P.: Efficient quantum circuit sim- ulation by tensor network methods on modern gpus. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 5(4), 1–26 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1145/3696465

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    Computers & Structures 171, 46–53 (2016) https://doi

    Alevras, P., Yurchenko, D.: Gpu computing for accelerating the numerical path integration approach. Computers & Structures 171, 46–53 (2016) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.002

    2016 doi

  85. [93]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10466 (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.10466

    Hauru, M., Morningstar, A., Beall, J., Ganahl, M., Lewis, A., Vidal, G.: Simula- tion of quantum physics with tensor processing units: brute-force computation of ground states and time evolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10466 (2021) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.10466

    2021 doi arXiv

  86. [94]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15080 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2410.15080

    Tornow, N., Mendl, C.B., Bhatotia, P.: Quantum-classical computing via tensor networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15080 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2410.15080

    2024 doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).[Internet] 9(1), 381–386 (2020)

    Mahesh, B.: Machine learning algorithms-a review. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).[Internet] 9(1), 381–386 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    Zhou, Z.-H.: Machine Learning, p. 400. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://do i.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1967-3 . https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978 -981-15-1967-3

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    Alpaydin, E.: Machine Learning, p. 232. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2016). https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529518/machine-learning/

    2016

  90. [98]

    Science 349(6245), 255–260 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Jordan, M.I., Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245), 255–260 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aaa8415

    2015 doi

  91. [99]

    In: Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Confer- ence, pp

    Fan, H., Guo, C., Luk, W.: Optimizing quantum circuit placement via machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Confer- ence, pp. 19–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3489517.3530403

    2022

  92. [100]

    ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 4(2), 1–25 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3565271

    Paler, A., Sasu, L., Florea, A.-C., Andonie, R.: Machine learning optimization of quantum circuit layouts. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 4(2), 1–25 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3565271

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    Physical review letters 120(24), 240501 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ 44 PhysRevLett.120.240501

    Gao, J., Qiao, L.-F., Jiao, Z.-Q., Ma, Y.-C., Hu, C.-Q., Ren, R.-J., Yang, A.-L., Tang, H., Yung, M.-H., Jin, X.-M.: Experimental machine learning of quantum states. Physical review letters 120(24), 240501 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ 44 PhysRevLett.120.240501

    2018

  94. [102]

    Physical Review A 107(3), 032421 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032421

    Vintskevich, S., Bao, N., Nomerotski, A., Stankus, P., Grigoriev, D.: Classifi- cation of four-qubit entangled states via machine learning. Physical Review A 107(3), 032421 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032421

    2023 doi

  95. [103]

    Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2024)

    NVIDIA Corporation: NVIDIA Jetson Orin: Embedded AI Computing Plat- form. Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2024). https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomo us-machines/embedded-systems/jetson-orin/

    2024

  96. [104]

    Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2023)

    Apple Inc.: Apple Introduces M2 Ultra. Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2023). https: //www.apple.com/my/newsroom/2023/06/apple-introduces-m2-ultra/

    2023

  97. [105]

    Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2024)

    Google Cloud: Introduction to Cloud TPUs. Accessed: 2025-02-01 (2024). https: //cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/intro-to-tpu

    2024

  98. [106]

    Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024)

    Xilinx Inc.: Versal VCK190 Evaluation Kit. Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024). https: //www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/vck190.html

    2024

  99. [107]

    Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024)

    NVIDIA Corporation: NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPU. Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024). https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/a100/

    2024

  100. [108]

    Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024)

    Google Quantum AI: Google Quantum AI. Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024). https: //quantumai.google/

    2024

  101. [109]

    Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024)

    Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF): HPC Clusters at Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility. Accessed: 2024-02-01 (2024). https://www.olcf .ornl.gov/about-olcf/staff-sections/systems/hpc-clusters/

    2024

  102. [110]

    Sievert, C.: Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, Plotly, and Shiny, p. 380. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2020). https://plotly-r.com/

    2020

  103. [111]

    IEEE Computer graphics and applications 20(5), 20–27 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1 109/38.865875

    Schroeder, W.J., Avila, L.S., Hoffman, W.: Visualizing with vtk: a tutorial. IEEE Computer graphics and applications 20(5), 20–27 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1 109/38.865875

    2000

  104. [112]

    Tosi, S.: Matplotlib for Python Developers, p. 308. Packt Publishing, Birming- ham, UK (2009). https://www.packtpub.com/product/matplotlib-f or-pytho n-developers/9781847197900

    2009

  105. [113]

    In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp

    Abadi, M.: Tensorflow: learning functions at scale. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 1–1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2951913.2976746

    2016

  106. [114]

    Programming with TensorFlow: solution for edge computing applications, 87–104 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57077-4 10 45

    Imambi, S., Prakash, K.B., Kanagachidambaresan, G.: Pytorch. Programming with TensorFlow: solution for edge computing applications, 87–104 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57077-4 10 45

    2021 doi

  107. [115]

    Deep learning with python: learn best practices of deep learning models with PyTorch, 27–91 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5364-9 2

    Ketkar, N., Moolayil, J., Ketkar, N., Moolayil, J.: Introduction to pytorch. Deep learning with python: learn best practices of deep learning models with PyTorch, 27–91 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5364-9 2

    2021 doi

  108. [116]

    Physical Review A 101(1), 010301 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.010301

    Lubasch, M., Joo, J., Moinier, P., Kiffner, M., Jaksch, D.: Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems. Physical Review A 101(1), 010301 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.010301

    2020 doi

  109. [117]

    Physical Review Research3(3), 033083 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033083

    Benedetti, M., Fiorentini, M., Lubasch, M.: Hardware-efficient variational quan- tum algorithms for time evolution. Physical Review Research3(3), 033083 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033083

    2021 doi

  110. [118]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 4769 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54598-5

    Brand, D., Sinayskiy, I., Petruccione, F.: Markovian noise modelling and param- eter extraction framework for quantum devices. Scientific Reports 14(1), 4769 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54598-5

    2024 doi

  111. [119]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05075 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2412.05075

    Alfonso, I., Conrardy, A., Cabot, J.: Towards the interoperability of low-code platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05075 (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/a rXiv.2412.05075

    2024 doi arXiv

  112. [120]

    Physical Review A 97(6), 062304 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.97.062304

    Lubasch, M., Valido, A.A., Renema, J.J., Kolthammer, W.S., Jaksch, D., Kim, M.S., Walmsley, I., Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, R.: Tensor network states in time-bin quan- tum optics. Physical Review A 97(6), 062304 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.97.062304

    2018

  113. [121]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 10432 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-024-61010-9

    Shu, G., Shan, Z., Xu, J., Zhao, J., Wang, S.: A general quantum algorithm for numerical integration. Scientific Reports 14(1), 10432 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-024-61010-9

    2024 doi

  114. [122]

    Quantum Information Processing 23(10), 1–28 (2024) https://doi

    Chen, Y.: A novel image classification framework based on variational quantum algorithms. Quantum Information Processing 23(10), 1–28 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1007/s11128-024-04566-9

    2024 doi

  115. [123]

    Scott, J., T ˚ uma, M.: Algorithms for Sparse Linear Systems, p. 264. Birkh¨ auser, Im Westfeld 8, 4055 Basel, Switzerland (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3 -031-25820-6

    2023 doi

  116. [124]

    PRX Quantum 5(2), 020362 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020362

    Mc Keever, C., Lubasch, M.: Towards adiabatic quantum computing using com- pressed quantum circuits. PRX Quantum 5(2), 020362 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020362

    2024 doi

  117. [125]

    Fadda, M.: An iOS Developer’s Guide to SwiftUI: Design and Build Beauti- ful Apps Quickly and Easily with Minimum Code, p. 446. Packt Publishing, Grosvenor House, 11 St Paul’s Square, Birmingham, B3 1RB (2024). https: //doi.org/https://books.google.com.my/books/about/An iOS De...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.