Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Addressing the so called quantum/classical "divide" in gravitational contexts, and its implications in cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that standard inflation's 'quantum fluctuations' are not real fluctuations, and that using spontaneous collapse dynamics instead both resolves the conceptual problem and suppresses the predicted primordial tensor-mode…

desk verdict A lucid review of the collapse-inflation programme whose flagship tensor-mode prediction is controlled by a physically unjustified cutoff. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05393 v1 pith:UZUONXR3 submitted 2025-02-08 gr-qc

Rosa-Laura Lechuga , Daniel Sudarsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords quantum-classicaldividesemiclassicalgravityspontaneouscollapseCSLmodelinflationarycosmologyprimordialtensormodesmeasurementproblemeternalinflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that standard inflationary cosmology commits a conceptual error when it treats quantum uncertainties in the vacuum state as if they were actual stochastic fluctuations that seed cosmic structure. The vacuum state of the inflaton perturbations is homogeneous and isotropic, so it contains no information that could break those symmetries. The authors propose that spontaneous collapse dynamics, of the CSL type, provide the genuine stochastic element, and when incorporated into a semiclassical gravity framework this resolves the issue while also changing observational predictions—most strikingly, suppressing the expected primordial tensor-mode signal.

What carries the argument

The central object is the semiclassical self-consistent configuration (SSC), defined by $G_{\mu\nu}=8\pi G\langle\xi|\hat{T}_{\mu\nu}|\xi\rangle$, in which the quantum field theory lives on the classical spacetime whose metric is itself sourced by the expectation value of the energy-momentum tensor. Into this framework the paper inserts a CSL-type stochastic modification of the Schr\"odinger equation, with a collapse operator and rate chosen to make the scalar spectrum scale-invariant (Eq. 11). The choice of collapse operator—field versus conjugate momentum—and the generalized rate $\lambda = \tilde{\lambda}(k^{\alpha+1}/(b+k)^\alpha)$ determine the scalar and tensor spectra and the condition for avoiding eternal inflation.

What would settle it

A detection of primordial B-modes at the amplitude predicted by standard slow-roll inflation (e.g., tensor-to-scalar ratio $r \approx 0.01$) would directly contradict the paper's claim that tensor modes are suppressed by many orders of magnitude. Alternatively, recomputing the tensor power spectrum without the UV cutoff would give a divergent result, exposing how the prediction depends on the cutoff value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Bunch-Davies vacuum state is completely homogeneous and isotropic, so quantum uncertainties alone cannot account for the observed inhomogeneities in the universe; an actual stochastic process is required. The paper shows that continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) dynamics, inserted into the semiclassical self-consistent configuration (SSC) framework, can break the symmetry. With zero initial conditions for tensor modes and a diffusion-scale cutoff, the tensor power spectrum becomes $P_h(k) \sim (1/k^3)(V/M_{\rm Pl}^4)^2(\tilde{\lambda}^2 T^4 p_{\rm UV}^5/k^3)$, strongly suppressed relative to the scalar spectrum $P_S(k) \sim (1/k^3)(1/\epsilon)(V/M_{\rm Pl}^4)\tilde{\lambda} T$. The paper concludes that tensor modes are not expected at the level current searches target.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative predictions rest on the still-unjustified choice of the collapse operator and rate, and on an ad hoc momentum cutoff for tensor modes; the paper itself says why the chosen operator is appropriate is not clear, so a different choice would change the spectra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The seeds of cosmic structure are produced by genuine spontaneous collapse events, not by quantum uncertainties, resolving the conceptual gap in the standard inflationary account.
  • Primordial tensor modes (and thus B-mode polarization) are suppressed by many orders of magnitude relative to the standard inflationary prediction, so current and near-future experiments should see no primordial B-modes.
  • The eternal inflation problem is avoidable for a region of the collapse-parameter space, as shown in Fig. 1, reconciling the simplest inflationary models with a finite inflationary period.
  • The same collapse-based semiclassical framework can be applied to other quantum-gravity interface issues, including black hole information loss and the problem of time in canonical quantum gravity.
  • The measured amplitude of the CMB scalar spectrum can fix the collapse rate $\tilde{\lambda} \approx 10^{-5}\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, a value not far from the rate suggested in collapse models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tensor suppression is robust, then null results in B-mode searches that are interpreted as ruling out slow-roll inflation would instead be consistent with a collapse-modified inflationary model, shifting the interpretation of those experiments.
  • The collapse-operator ambiguity (field versus momentum) is an open free parameter; future constraints from gravitational-wave backgrounds, CMB spectral distortions, or interferometer missions could pin it down and make the model falsifiable in a quantitative way.
  • The same logic that removes eternal inflation implies other cosmology phenomena attributed to quantum fluctuations, such as stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds or primordial black hole formation, should be reanalyzed as stochastic-collapse effects.
  • A testable extension would be to compute the tensor-to-scalar ratio for specific inflationary potentials within this model and compare its scale dependence with future large-scale CMB observations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript addresses the conceptual foundations of inflationary cosmology. It argues that the standard practice of treating "quantum fluctuations" of inflation as stochastic fluctuations is unjustified, since without collapse events quantum uncertainties are not actual inhomogeneities. The authors propose to combine semiclassical gravity with spontaneous collapse models (CSL/GRW) and present three consequences: a mechanism for generating scalar seeds; a suppression of primordial tensor modes; and avoidance of eternal inflation for a region of parameter space. The central slogan is that tensor modes are not expected at the level at which current searches are looking. The quantitative part relies on earlier work by the same group and extends it to tensor modes.

Significance. The conceptual critique in Sections 2 and 3 is clear and, in this referee's view, correct in its main line: decoherence alone does not solve the measurement problem in cosmology, and equating quantum uncertainties with stochastic fluctuations is a substantive interpretive step. The paper also has the merit of being explicit about its assumptions and limitations, including the admission that the collapse operator choice is unclear. If the proposed framework were developed into a predictive theory, the tensor-mode suppression would be a striking, falsifiable consequence. As it stands, however, the quantitative claims are not self-contained: the scalar spectrum is fitted, and the tensor suppression is controlled by an ad hoc cutoff. The eternal-inflation discussion is more robust because it is framed in terms of a parameter region.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7, Eqs. (13)-(16)] The paper's most prominent quantitative claim—that "Tensor modes are, thus, not expected at the level they are being looked for"—is not supported by the calculation as presented. The source term in Eq. (13) is stated to be formally divergent, and Eq. (15) is regulated by imposing p_UV ≈ 0.078 Mpc^{-1}, which the text identifies with "Silk dumping." This identification is not physically appropriate for a source active during inflation: Silk damping is the photon-diffusion suppression of CMB anisotropies at recombination, not a mechanism that cuts off the gravitational-wave source term in Eq. (13). Since the resulting power spectrum in Eq. (16) scales as p_UV^5, the predicted suppression is an artifact of the chosen regulator. Using a Hubble-scale cutoff, a Planck-scale cutoff, or a renormalized version of the source would change the prediction by orders of magnitude. A derivation of the short-wavelength suppression from the collapse dynamics itself, or a proper renormalization procedure, is required before this central prediction can be accepted.
  2. [§6, Eq. (11) and surrounding text] The scalar power spectrum is not an independent prediction of the framework: the two forms of λ in Eq. (11) are "chosen in order to lead to a scale-invariant power spectrum," and the amplitude λ~ is subsequently fixed to match the observed scalar amplitude. Consequently, the statement that λ~ ~ 10^{-5} Mpc^{-1} is close to GRW values is an output of fitting, not a prediction. This does not invalidate the conceptual program, but it means that the empirical success attributed to the collapse scheme rests on parameters and an operator whose physical origin the paper explicitly says is not clear ("Why this is the appropriate choice of collapse operator is not clear at this time"). The reader should be told which of the quantitative claims are free of these fitted inputs.
  3. [§5.1 and Eq. (10)] The derivation of Eq. (10) assumes negligible entanglement between the zero mode and the perturbation modes, and the SSC-to-SSC transition ("gluing") is handled by a "practical procedure" that is asserted to give equivalent results to the more rigorous formalism. These are substantive dynamical assumptions. In particular, the transfer of the collapse-induced change in ⟨π(k,η)⟩ into the Newtonian potential via Eq. (10) is the entire mechanism for structure formation, so it needs more than an appeal to prior publications. If the gluing conditions of Ref. [48] modify the leading-order result, the scalar spectrum in Eq. (12) and therefore the fitted value of λ~ would change.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5] The text refers to the "Navier-Stocks equations"; this should be "Navier-Stokes equations."
  2. [§7] The phrase "Silk dumping" should be "Silk damping."
  3. [§4, Eq. (5)] The displayed smeared position operator contains apparent typographical errors: the exponent of the Gaussian kernel and the notation for the two-point kernel should be checked against the standard CSL definition.
  4. [References] References [12] and [54] appear to be duplicates, and reference [25] is incomplete as it lacks a title and journal information.
  5. [Footnote 1] The phrase "te Moon’s places" should read "the Moon’s place."

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The quantitative claims (scalar fit, tensor suppression, no-eternal-inflation region) are built from a collapse rate chosen to reproduce the observed spectrum, an ad hoc regulator, and free parameters; the conceptual quantum-vs-stochastic critique is independent.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sec. 6, around Eq. (11)]
    "The form for λ in each case, is chosen in order to lead to a scale-invariant power spectrum (which is indicated by the observations [55] (we will ignore at this point the slight departure from perfect scale invariance). φ̂(x) as the collapse operator gives: λ = λ̃k, π̂(x) as the collapse operator gives: λ = λ̃/k. ... Why is this the appropriate choice of collapse operator is not clear at this time."

    The functional form of the collapse rate is imported from the authors' prior work [71] and is fixed by requiring the scalar power spectrum to match the observed scale-invariant form. No independent derivation from the collapse dynamics is given. All subsequent quantitative results, including the tensor-mode spectrum of Eq. (16), inherit this fitted functional form, so the modified 'predictions' are consequences of the input chosen to reproduce the standard scalar spectrum.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 7, Eq. (16)]
    "The result is formally divergent, however, it seems clear we must introduce a cut-off as modes with sufficiently short wave-length can be expected to become suppressed by diffusive physics. Thus, we take the cutoff to correspond to the standard (scale of diffusion, Silk dumping with pUV≈0.078Mpc−1). Then the prediction for the power spectrum of tensor perturbations is: Ph(k) ∼ (1/k3)(V /M4Pl)2(λ̃2T 4p5UV/k3)... Tensor modes are, thus, not expected at the level they are being looked for."

    The advertised suppression is dominated by the p_UV^5 factor in Eq. (16), and p_UV is not derived from the collapse dynamics; it is introduced to regulate a formally divergent integral. Together with λ̃ fitted to the scalar spectrum, the headline claim that tensor modes are undetectable is a direct consequence of the chosen regulator and fitted parameter, not an independent prediction. Changing the regulator (e.g., to the Hubble scale at the end of inflation) changes P_h by orders of magnitude.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 8]
    "The analysis indicated the condition for no-eternal inflation, namely, ∆Stoch/∆class < 1, defines a region of parameter space where the Eternal inflation problem is avoided. ... The α scale was chosen arbitrarily while b was selected to retain compatibility with CMB and BAO bounds."

    The 'no eternal inflation' region is defined by the inequality ∆Stoch/∆class < 1, and α and b are free parameters. Asserting that such a region exists is a restatement of the parameter freedom, not a derived consequence. The paper explicitly chooses α arbitrarily and selects b to satisfy observational bounds, so the conclusion is an input rather than a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's conceptual argument—that textbook quantum uncertainties are not stochastic fluctuations and that collapse theories provide a principled way to break homogeneity—is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. However, the quantitative derivation chain is not. In Sec. 6 the collapse rate λ is chosen, importing [71], specifically to make the scalar power spectrum scale invariant, and its amplitude is adjusted to match observations; Eq. (12) is therefore a fit, not a prediction. The tensor spectrum in Sec. 7 is presented as the main novel prediction, but Eq. (16) inherits the fitted λ and contains p_UV^5, where p_UV is an ad hoc regulator introduced because the source integral diverges; changing the regulator changes the advertised suppression by orders of magnitude. The eternal-inflation discussion similarly 'defines a region' with arbitrarily chosen α and b, so the avoidance is an existence claim within the parameter freedom rather than a derived consequence. These issues make the quantitative claims partially circular, while leaving the conceptual critique intact.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on a chain of unverified or fitted elements: the adoption of collapse models, an unspecified collapse operator, a rate lambda fitted to the scalar spectrum, a momentum cutoff for the tensor modes, and assumptions of negligible entanglement and perturbative gluing. The paper is a synthesis of prior work, not a self-contained derivation.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda-tilde (collapse rate amplitude) = approximately 10^-5 Mpc^-1, approximately 10^-19 sec^-1
    Chosen so that the scalar power spectrum Eq. (12) matches the observed CMB amplitude at GUT-scale V; the paper explicitly says lambda is chosen to lead to a scale-invariant spectrum and agreement with observation (Sec. 6).
  • Collapse operator and k-dependence of lambda = A = delta-phi with lambda = lambda-tilde k, or A = delta-pi with lambda = lambda-tilde/k
    The operator choice is made to yield a near scale-invariant spectrum; the paper says the correct universal operator is unknown (Sec. 6), and alternative proposals give different predictions.
  • p_UV momentum cutoff for tensor modes = 0.078 Mpc^-1
    Introduced after Eq. (15) to render the formally divergent tensor source finite; motivated by Silk damping but is a user-supplied cutoff that affects the tensor power spectrum Ph.
  • T (conformal time at start of inflation) = 10^8 Mpc
    Input for standard inflationary parameters used in Eqs. (16) and (17); not derived in the paper.
  • alpha and b in generalized collapse rate (Eq. 20) = Region shown in Fig. 1; numerical values not tabulated
    Free parameters of Eq. (20) chosen to avoid eternal inflation while retaining CMB/BAO compatibility; b is in units of 10^-5 Mpc^-1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The quantum mechanical measurement problem is real and not solved by decoherence.
    The entire motivation for collapse models rests on this stance; the paper cites [45,46] and the appendix, but it is a foundational position, not a theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper Spontaneous collapse dynamics (CSL/GRW) can be adapted to QFT in curved spacetime and applied mode by mode to inflationary perturbations.
    The paper assumes a 'practical procedure' in Sec. 6 and admits the universal collapse operator is unknown; no independent physical basis is provided.
  • domain assumption The initial inflationary state is the Bunch-Davies vacuum with a highly excited, sharply peaked zero mode, and a slow-roll background a(eta) = -1/(eta H_I).
    Standard inflationary input used in Secs. 3 and 6; the structure-generation calculation depends on this initial state.
  • ad hoc to paper Negligible entanglement between the zero mode and perturbation modes, so Eq. (10) holds.
    Stated explicitly after Eq. (10); it allows treating each mode independently, but is not justified in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Semi-classical self-consistent configurations (SSC) and the perturbative gluing of states after collapse are adequate.
    Secs. 5 and 5.1: the rigorous SSC-to-SSC transitions are not worked out, and the paper relies on a simplified single-Hilbert-space construction with perturbative backreaction.
invented entities (2)
  • Stochastic collapse noise w(t) for each Fourier mode, with mode-dependent rate lambda(k)
    purpose: Drives the wave-function collapse that turns quantum uncertainties into actual stochastic expectation values seeding structure (Eqs. (3)-(4), (10)-(11)).
    No independent detection of collapse noise; lambda is fitted to the scalar spectrum, and the noise is postulated by CSL-type theories.
  • SSC-to-SSC transition (gluing) between semi-classical configurations
    purpose: Joins spacetimes before and after a collapse event so that semiclassical gravity can describe the collapse (Eq. (7)).
    The gluing prescription is assumed, with open questions about renormalization and well-posedness noted in Sec. 5.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Addressing the so called quantum/classical "divide" in gravitational contexts, and its implications in cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UZUONXR3

@misc{pith2026250205393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Addressing the so called quantum/classical "divide" in gravitational contexts, and its implications in cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UZUONXR3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05393}
}
read the original abstract

The manner in which one approaches the interface between gravitation and quantum theory is influenced by one's posture regarding quantum mechanics and the issues that revolve about its interpretational problems. We discuss here the way in which these issues occur in the inflationary cosmology setting, the serious confusions that ensue, and one path that we have used to deal with the problem which perhaps surprisingly ends up, not just offering a conceptually clear physical picture, but also modifying some of the standard observational predictions of the inflationary approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05393 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In the last plot, the units are in Mpc−1 , and the yellow region represents where there is NO eternal inflation problem. The α scale was chosen arbitrarily while b was selected to retain compatibility with CMB and BAO bounds. b is in units of 10−5Mpc−1 . The freedom present in the modified quantum dynamics provided by spontaneous collapse theories opens the path for avoiding problems that appear to afflict many spec… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Ju´ arez-Aubry, B.S

    B.A. Ju´ arez-Aubry, B.S. Kay, T. Miramontes, & D. Sudarsky, On the initial value prob- lem for semiclassical gravity without and with quantum state, collapses, JCAP 01 (2023) [arXiv:2205.11671]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory

    G. Lema ˆ ıtre, “The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory” Nature 127, 706 (1931)

    work page 1931

  3. [2]

    Loop Quantum Gravity

    C. Rovelli, “Loop Quantum Gravity”, Living Reviews in Relativity, 11, 1–69 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [3]

    String Theory as a Quantum Theory of Gravity

    G. Horowitz, “String Theory as a Quantum Theory of Gravity”, Proceedings of 12th Int. Conf. on General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by N. Ashby, D.F. Bartlett & W. Wyss, 419–439 (1990)

    work page 1990

  5. [4]

    Space-time as a causal set

    L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, & R. Sorkin, “Space-time as a causal set” Phys.Rev.Lett., 59, 521-524 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [5]

    Causal Dynamical Triangulations: Gateway to Nonperturbative Quan- tum Gravity

    J. Ambjørn & R. Loll, “Causal Dynamical Triangulations: Gateway to Nonperturbative Quan- tum Gravity”, arXiv:2401.09399 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems”, Phys. Rev. D, 23, 347–356 (1981)

    work page 1981

  8. [7]

    Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory

    T. Norsen, “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory”, Springer Cham, (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 75 references
  1. [8]

    The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics

    R. Penrose, “The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics” Oxford Landmark Science, United Kingdom, (1989)

    1989

  2. [9]

    On the Quantum Uncertainty of the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment

    O. Guerrero, L. Barr´ on-Palos & D. Sudarsky, “On the Quantum Uncertainty of the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment” Annals Phys., 469, 169761 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Three measurement problems

    T. Maudlin, “Three measurement problems”, Topoi, 14(1):7–15, (1995)

    1995

  4. [11]

    Difficulties for the evolution of pure states into mixed states

    Banks, T., Susskind, L., & Peskin, “Difficulties for the evolution of pure states into mixed states”. Nucl. Phys., 44 B(234):125 M. E. (1984)

    1984

  5. [12]

    Quantum Probability & Applications II

    G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini & T. Weber, “Quantum Probability & Applications II”, L. Ac- cardi and W. von Wandelfels eds., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1136, Springer, Berlin (1985)

    1985

  6. [13]

    Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localiza- tion

    P. Pearle, “Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localiza- tion ”, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5 (1989)

    1989

  7. [14]

    Relativistic state reduction dynamics

    D. J. Bedingham, “Relativistic state reduction dynamics”, Found. Phys. 41, 4 686-704, (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    A relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber model

    R. Tumulka, “A relativistic version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber model”, J. Stat. Phys. 125, 821-840 (2006)

    2006

  9. [16]

    Quantum Concepts in Space and Time

    R. Penrose & C. J. Isham, “Quantum Concepts in Space and Time”, Oxford University Press, (1986)

    1986

  10. [17]

    A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics,

    L.Di´ osi, “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Lett. A, 120, 8, 377-381 (1987). 13

    1987

  11. [18]

    Gravitation and quantum mechanical localization of macro-objects

    L. Diosi, “Gravitation and quantum mechanical localization of macro-objects”, Phys. Lett. A 105, 199 - 202 (1984)

    1984

  12. [19]

    Underground test of gravity-related wave func- tion collapse,

    S. Donadi, K. Piscicchia, C.Curceanu, et al., “Underground test of gravity-related wave func- tion collapse,” Nature Phys., 17, 74–78 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Towards a formal description of the collapse approach to the infla- tionary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure

    A. Diez & D. Sudarsky, “Towards a formal description of the collapse approach to the infla- tionary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure”, JCAP, 045 (2012)

    2012

  14. [21]

    Is quantum gravity necessary?

    Carlip, S.,“Is quantum gravity necessary?” Class. Quant. Grav., 25:154010, (2008)

    2008

  15. [22]

    On evolution laws taking pure states to mixed states in quantum field theory

    W. G. Unruh, & R. M. Wald, “On evolution laws taking pure states to mixed states in quantum field theory”, Phys.Rev. D, 52:2176, (1995)

    1995

  16. [23]

    Indirect evidence for quantum gravity

    D.N. Page & C.D. Geilker, “Indirect evidence for quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981)

    1981

  17. [24]

    On the status of conservation laws in physics: Impli- cations for semiclassical gravity

    T. Maudlin, E. Ok´ on & D. Sudarsky, “On the status of conservation laws in physics: Impli- cations for semiclassical gravity”, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 69, (2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    Bahrami, A

    M. Bahrami, A. Großardt, S. Donadi & A. Bassi,

  19. [26]

    Eternal chaotic inflation

    A. D. Linde, “Eternal chaotic inflation ”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1, 81, (1986)

    1986

  20. [27]

    Cosmological inflation and the quantum measurement problem

    J. Martin, V. Vennin & P. Peter, “Cosmological inflation and the quantum measurement problem” Phys. Rev. D, 86, 103524 (2012)

    2012

  21. [28]

    Enlightening the CSL model landscape in inflation

    G. Le´ on, G., & G. R. Bengochea,“Enlightening the CSL model landscape in inflation ”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(12), 1055 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Quantum to classical transition of inflationary perturbations: Continuous spontaneous localization as a possible mechanism

    S. Das, K. Lochan, S. Sahu, & T. P. Singh, “Quantum to classical transition of inflationary perturbations: Continuous spontaneous localization as a possible mechanism”, Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, no. 8, p. 085020, (2013)

    2013

  23. [30]

    Eternal inflation and collapse theories

    R.L. Lechuga & D. Sudarsky, “ Eternal inflation and collapse theories”, JCAP, Vol 01, 038 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function

    E. Ok´ on & D. Sudarsky, “The Black Hole Information Paradox and the Collapse of the Wave Function” Found. Phys. 45, 461 (2015)

    2015

  25. [32]

    Non-Paradoxical Loss of Information in Black Hole Evaporation in Collapse Theories

    S. K. Modak, L. Ortiz, I. Pe˜ na & D. Sudarsky, “ Non-Paradoxical Loss of Information in Black Hole Evaporation in Collapse Theories” Phys. Rev. D 91, 124009 (2015)

    2015

  26. [33]

    Relativistic collapse dynamics and black hole information loss

    D. Bedingham, S. K. Modak, & D. Sudarsky, “Relativistic collapse dynamics and black hole information loss”, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 045009 (2016)

    2016

  27. [34]

    Black Holes, Information Loss and the Measurement Problem

    E. Ok´ on, & D. Sudarsky, “Black Holes, Information Loss and the Measurement Problem”, Found. Phys., 47, 120 (2017)

    2017

  28. [35]

    Losing stuff down a black hole

    E. Ok´ on, & D. Sudarsky, “Losing stuff down a black hole”, Found. Phys., 48, 411-428 (2018)

    2018

  29. [36]

    Collapse of the wavefunction, the information paradox and backreaction

    S. K. Modak, & D. Sudarsky, “Collapse of the wavefunction, the information paradox and backreaction ”, EPJC,78 no.7, 556 (2018). 14

    2018

  30. [37]

    A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation

    A. Perez, & D. Sudarsky, “A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation ”, chapter in Special Topic Collection Celebrating Sir Roger Penrose’s Nobel Prize, A VS Quan- tum Science, 4(4), 045602 (2022)

    2022

  31. [38]

    A general argument against the universal validity of the superposition principle

    A. Bassi & G. Ghirardi, “A general argument against the universal validity of the superposition principle”. Physics Letters A, 275(5-6), 373-381, (2000)

    2000

  32. [39]

    Benefits of Objective Collapse Models for Cosmology and Quantum Gravity

    E. Ok´ on, & D. Sudarsky, “Benefits of Objective Collapse Models for Cosmology and Quantum Gravity” FoP 44, 114 (2014)

    2014

  33. [40]

    Towards a formal description of the collapse approach to the infla- tionary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure

    A. Diez-Tejedor & D.S., “Towards a formal description of the collapse approach to the infla- tionary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure”, JCAP. 045, 1207, (2012) arXiv:1108.4928 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Wald, General Relativity, Chicago Univ

    R. Wald, General Relativity, Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA,(1984)

    1984

  35. [42]

    Collapse models, relativity, and discrete spacetime

    D.J. Bedingham, “Collapse models, relativity, and discrete spacetime”, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 198 (2020) 191; D.J. Bedingham, Relativistic state reduction dynamics, Found. Phys. 41 (2011) 686 [arXiv:1003.2774]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [43]

    On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory

    R. Tumulka, “On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 462 (2006) 1897 [quant-ph/0508230]

    2006 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Relativistic dynamical collapse model

    P. Pearle, “Relativistic dynamical collapse model”, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105012 [arXiv:1412.6723]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Infla- tionary Cosmology and Elsewhere

    E. Ok´ on & D. Sudarsky, “Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Infla- tionary Cosmology and Elsewhere”, Found. Phys., 46(7), 852-879, (2016)

    2016

  39. [46]

    Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P.W. Anderson

    Stephen L. Adler, “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P.W. Anderson ”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34(1), 135-142, (2003)

    2003

  40. [47]

    Bound state excitation, nucleon decay experiments and models of wave function collapse,

    P. Pearle and E. Squires, “Bound state excitation, nucleon decay experiments and models of wave function collapse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1–5 (1994)

    1994

  41. [49]

    Reassessing the link between B-modes and inflation

    G. Le´ on Garc ´ ıa, A. Majhi, E. Ok´ on, & D. Sudarsky, “Reassessing the link between B-modes and inflation”, PRD 96, 101301(R) (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Expectation of primordial gravity waves generated during inflation

    G. Le´ on Garc ´ ıa, A. Majhi, E. Ok´ on, & D. Sudarsky, “Expectation of primordial gravity waves generated during inflation ” Phys. Rev. D PRD 98 023512 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Quantum mechanics for cosmologists

    J.S. Bell & A. Aspect, “Quantum mechanics for cosmologists”, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, pp. 117-138, (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Norsen, T., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory, Springer Cham, (2017). 15

    2017

  45. [53]

    Eternal inflation and the quantum birth of cosmic structure,

    G. Le´ on, “Eternal inflation and the quantum birth of cosmic structure,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 705 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T., Quantum Probability and Applications II, L

    Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T., Quantum Probability and Applications II, L. Accardi and W. von Wandelfels (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1136, Springer, Berlin (1985)

    1985

  47. [55]

    Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on infla- tion,

    P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck Collaboration], “Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on infla- tion,” arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO] (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary Universe

    S. W. Hawking, “The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary Universe”, Phys. Lett. B 115, 295 (1982)

    1982

  49. [57]

    Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary Universe scenario and generation of perturbations,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary Universe scenario and generation of perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B 117, 175-178 (1982)

    1982

  50. [58]

    Fluctuations in the new inflationary Universe

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the new inflationary Universe”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110-1113 (1982)

    1982

  51. [59]

    A. L. Linde, ”A new inflationary Universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flat- ness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems”, Phys. Lett. B 108, 389-393 (1982)

    1982

  52. [60]

    Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary Universe

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner “Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary Universe”, Phys. Rev. D 28, 679 (1983)

    1983

  53. [61]

    Theory of cosmological pertur- bations

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological pertur- bations”, Phys. Rep. 215, 203-333 (1992)

    1992

  54. [62]

    Semiclassicality and decoherence of Cosmological pertur- bations

    D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, “Semiclassicality and decoherence of Cosmological pertur- bations”, Class. Quant. Grav. 13, 377 (1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    Origin of Classical Structure from Inflation

    C. Kiefer “Origin of Classical Structure from Inflation”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 88, 255 and references therein, (2000)

    2000

  56. [64]

    Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?

    C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, “Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?”, Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 164, [arXiv:0810.0087 [astro-ph]], (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  57. [65]

    On the quantum origin of the seeds of cosmic structure,

    A. Perez, H. Sahlmann and D. Sudarsky, “On the quantum origin of the seeds of cosmic structure,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 2317, [gr-qc/0508100], (2006)

    2006 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Shortcomings in the Understanding of Why Cosmological Perturbations Look Classical

    D. Sudarsky, “Shortcomings in the Understanding of Why Cosmological Perturbations Look Classical”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 509, [arXiv:0906.0315 [gr-qc]], (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Critical review of prevailing explanations for the emergence of classicality in cosmology

    J. Berjon, E. Ok´ on, D. Sudarsky, “Critical review of prevailing explanations for the emergence of classicality in cosmology ”, Phys. Rev. D . 103, No 4, 043521, (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    The Inflationary Origin of the Seeds: quantum theory and the need for novel physics

    D. Sudarsky, “The Inflationary Origin of the Seeds: quantum theory and the need for novel physics” General Relativity, Cosmology and Astrophysics Fundamental Theories of Physics Vol. 177, 349 (2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    The Slow roll condition and the amplitude of the primordial spec- trum of cosmic fluctuations: Contrasts and similarities of standard account and the ’collapse scheme’,

    G. Leon and D. Sudarsky, “The Slow roll condition and the amplitude of the primordial spec- trum of cosmic fluctuations: Contrasts and similarities of standard account and the ’collapse scheme’,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 225017 (2010). 16

    2010

  62. [70]

    Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localiza- tion,

    P. Pearle, “Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localiza- tion,” Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989)

    1989

  63. [71]

    CSL Wave Function Collapse Model as a Mechanism for the Emergence of Cosmological Asymmetries in Inflation

    P. Canate, P. Pearle and D. Sudarsky, “CSL Wave Function Collapse Model as a Mechanism for the Emergence of Cosmological Asymmetries in Inflation ”, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 104024 (2013)

    2013

  64. [72]

    Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics

    R. M. Wald “Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics”, Chicago Lectures in Physics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-87027-8, (2013)

    2013

  65. [73]

    Dynamical reduction models

    Bassi, A., & Ghirardi, G.,“Dynamical reduction models”, Physics Reports, 379(5), 257-426, (2003)

    2003

  66. [74]

    On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction

    R. Penrose, “On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction ”, Gen. Relat. Gravit., 28, 581 (1996)

    1996

  67. [75]

    On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics

    Kochen, S., and Specker, E. P. “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”, J. Math. Mech., 17, 59–87 (1967). 11 Appendix: Illustrating the Measurement Problem This serious shortcoming of the standard version of quantum theory is surprisingly ignored by large seg...

    1967

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.