Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 76 references

Tunable altermagnetism via inter-chain engineering in parallelassembled atomic chains

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In quasi-1D magnetic-chain monolayers, the sign of inter-chain coupling controls altermagnetism.

desk verdict A clean symmetry-based extension of altermagnetism to quasi-1D chain assemblies, with material predictions that are suggestive but rest on inter-chain exchange energies near DFT noise. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05785 v3 pith:MVJZKM7Z submitted 2025-02-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Deping Guo , Canbo Zong , Weihan Zhang , Cong Wang , Junwei Liu , Wei Ji This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismquasi-one-dimensionalmonolayerssingle-atomicmagneticchainsinter-chaincouplingspinsplittingnodal-linesemiconductorDFT+UCrCl3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that altermagnetism, a collinear antiferromagnetic phase with spin-split bands and zero net magnetization, can exist in quasi-1D monolayers built from parallel single-atomic magnetic chains, and that its presence is governed by one knob: the magnetic coupling between chains. Through symmetry analysis and DFT+U calculations on nine structural families, the authors identify four altermagnetic prototypes and screen 192 candidate monolayers down to eight dynamically stable ones. They predict three intrinsic altermagnets (CrBr3, VBr3, MnBr3) with ferromagnetic inter-chain coupling, and five extrinsic ones (CrF3, CrCl3, CrI3, FeCl3, CoTe3) with negligible or antiferromagnetic inter-chain coupling. The central result is tunability: changing inter-chain spacing by a few tenths of an Ångström switches the coupling sign and converts CrCl3 between an altermagnetic semiconductor and a Néel antiferromagnetic nodal-line semiconductor. This matters because it gives experimentalists a mechanical, in-situ control over a magnetic phase that is usually fixed by chemistry.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through three linked objects. First is the symmetry analysis of the four altermagnetic prototypes: sublattices with opposite spins are related by C2x or Mx rotations or mirrors rather than by inversion or translation, so P-T symmetry is broken; for the β-XY3 monolayers, inter-chain inversion centers P1 and P2 already break P-T, and inversion center P3 does so only when inter-chain spins are parallel. Second is an Ising Hamiltonian with nearest-, second-nearest-, and third-nearest-neighbor exchanges J1, J2, and J3, where J3 is the inter-chain exchange; the sign of J3 acts as the altermagnetism switch. Third is a two-orbital Bethe-Slater analysis of how inter-chain spacing changes Pauli repulsion and inter-chain hopping, producing two distinct antiferromagnetic regions and the two trends, Trend-I and Trend-D, that map which materials switch with spacing. DFT+U calculations with linear-response-derived U values supply the quantitative exchange constants and band structures.

What would settle it

Grow or place the predicted Q1D monolayers, for example CrCl3 single-atomic chains, on a substrate that fixes the inter-chain spacing, then measure spin splitting by angle-resolved photoemission or spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy at 6.00 Å versus 6.40 Å spacings; if no spin splitting appears in the ferromagnetically coupled state, or if a nodal-line gap appears at the wrong spacing, the J3-sign criterion is wrong. Alternatively, compute J3 at those spacings with a method more accurate than DFT+U, such as a hybrid functional or quantum Monte Carlo, and check whether the sign matches the reported values.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In AA-stacked β-XY3 monolayers with intra-chain antiferromagnetic order, the inter-chain magnetic coupling J3 determines altermagnetism. When J3 is ferromagnetic, the inter-chain inversion center P3 connects same-spin atoms; combined with the other inversion centers P1 and P2 that also connect same-spin atoms, the joint parity-time (P-T) symmetry is broken and spin-split bands appear, the altermagnetic signature. When J3 becomes antiferromagnetic, P-T symmetry is restored and the system becomes an ordinary antiferromagnetic nodal-line semiconductor. The authors demonstrate this for CrCl3: at 6.00 Å inter-chain spacing J3 equals +0.02 meV/Cr and spin splitting appears along the S-Γ-S' path, while at 6.40 Å J3 equals -0.01 meV/Cr and the system is a Néel antiferromagnet with a 2.84 eV gap and fourfold-degenerate nodal lines. They also identify two spacing trends, Trend-D where compression stabilizes ferromagnetic coupling (VBr3, CrBr3, CrI3, CrCl3, MnBr3) and Trend-I where expansion stabilizes ferromagnetic coupling (CoTe3, CrF3, FeCl3), and show that an out-of-plane electric field roughly doubles the spin splitting of CrCl3 and can induce small splittings in slid or rotated AFM structures by breaking remaining symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The entire intrinsic/extrinsic classification and the predicted ferromagnetic-to-antiferromagnetic switches rest on inter-chain exchange constants J3 computed with DFT+U that are as small as 0.00 to 0.01 meV, values close to the numerical noise of the method, with no error bars or convergence tests reported; if the sign of J3 flips at the meV scale, the central prediction fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Altermagnetism is not limited to 2D and 3D materials; quasi-1D monolayers assembled from magnetic chains form a new platform, with four structural prototypes identified among thirty candidates.
  • In AA-stacked β-XY3 monolayers with intra-chain AFM order, the sign of the inter-chain exchange J3 alone separates intrinsic altermagnets (FM J3) from extrinsic ones (zero or AFM J3), giving a concrete list of three intrinsic and five extrinsic materials.
  • Inter-chain spacing is a practical tuning handle: changing the lattice constant b by roughly 0.2 to 0.4 Å can switch the magnetic ground state and drive transitions between altermagnetic and nodal-line antiferromagnetic semiconducting states, as demonstrated for CrCl3, VBr3, and CoTe3.
  • Electric fields provide an additional control axis, approximately doubling the spin splitting in freestanding CrCl3 (from about 10 to 20 meV at 0.2 V/Å) and, in slid or rotated AFM structures, inducing small spin splittings by breaking the remaining symmetries.
  • All eight dynamically stable monolayers come from a single prototype, AA-stacked β-XY3 with intra-chain AFM order, which gives a sharply focused synthetic target list for experimental efforts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the J3 sign is robust, the same inter-chain spacing knob should apply to other vdW-assembled chain families beyond XY3, because the symmetry condition only requires intra-chain AFM ordering plus ferromagnetic inter-chain coupling.
  • The near-zero J3 values reported for CrF3 and CrCl3 (0.00 meV) suggest these are the most promising candidates for experimental switching, since a tiny strain or pressure could flip the sign; conversely, those values sit at the edge of DFT numerical noise, so the prediction should be checked with higher-accuracy methods.
  • The predicted electric-field doubling of spin splitting points toward electrostatic gating as a device-compatible control, possibly enabling field-switchable spin currents in a single monolayer.
  • The two-orbital Bethe-Slater picture implies a general design rule: materials whose equilibrium spacing sits in the Trend-D region should become stronger altermagnets under compression, while Trend-I materials should become altermagnets under tension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper extends the concept of altermagnetism to quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) monolayers assembled from single-atomic magnetic chains. Using symmetry analysis and DFT+U calculations, the authors systematically examine nine structural phases, two stacking orders, and intra-/inter-chain magnetic couplings, identifying four structural prototypes out of thirty that satisfy the symmetry requirements for altermagnetism. They then construct 192 candidate monolayers from these prototypes, screen them for dynamical stability via phonon calculations, and identify eight dynamically stable AA-stacked β-XY3 monolayers. Based on the sign of the inter-chain exchange parameter J3, they classify three materials (CrBr3, VBr3, MnBr3) as intrinsic altermagnets with ferromagnetic inter-chain coupling and five (CrF3, CrCl3, CrI3, FeCl3, CoTe3) as extrinsic altermagnets with negligible or antiferromagnetic inter-chain coupling. The paper further predicts that inter-chain spacing can tune J3, driving transitions between altermagnetic and nodal-line antiferromagnetic semiconducting states, and that external electric fields modulate the spin splitting.

Significance. The symmetry-based design principle is internally coherent: for the four identified prototypes, the presence or absence of altermagnetism follows directly from whether the inter-chain magnetic coupling is FM or AFM, and this is a useful conceptual advance for low-dimensional altermagnetism. The screening is systematic and the identification of experimentally accessible CrCl3 chains as a tunable platform is timely given recent synthesis work. The quantitative material-specific predictions, however, rest on extremely small inter-chain exchange energies (J3 values of 0.00–0.01 meV in Table 1), and the paper provides no uncertainty quantification. If the predictions are robust, this would establish a new family of Q1D altermagnets with a unique tunability mechanism; the current manuscript does not yet provide sufficient evidence for that robustness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 1 and Fig. 3] The classification of CrBr3 and VBr3 as intrinsic altermagnets and CrCl3 as an extrinsic altermagnet rests on J3 values of +0.01, +0.01, and 0.00 meV per magnetic atom (Table 1), corresponding to FM-AFM energy differences of order 10^-5 eV per atom. The predicted spacing-driven transitions for CrCl3 (6.00 vs 6.40 Å) and VBr3 (6.80 Å) are driven by changes in J3 of only 0.01–0.02 meV. The manuscript reports no convergence tests for k-mesh, smearing, the vdW functional, or the Hubbard U values, and no error estimates for these energy differences. Since a sign change in J3 at this scale would reclassify these materials and invalidate the central predictions, the paper needs to demonstrate that the computed J3 values are robust to numerical parameters, or the material-specific claims must be tempered.
  2. [Abstract and concluding paragraph] The abstract states that the paper 'confirm[s] eight thermodynamically stable Q1D monolayers via high-throughput calculations,' but the last paragraph states 'While our study establishes the dynamical stability of AA-stacked β-XY3 altermagnets, their thermodynamic stability warrants further investigations [76].' These two statements are contradictory. The abstract should be revised to 'dynamically stable' or the thermodynamic stability must actually be established in the manuscript.
  3. [Table 1 and discussion of experimental feasibility] The inter-chain exchange constants J3 that stabilize the altermagnetic order are 0.01–0.48 meV per magnetic atom (Table 1). In a quasi-1D or 2D Ising system, such an exchange corresponds to an ordering temperature of roughly J3/k_B, i.e., approximately 0.1–5 K. The paper claims 'experimentally feasible transitions between altermagnetic and nodal-line semiconducting states,' but it does not estimate the magnetic ordering temperature or discuss whether the altermagnetic spin splitting would survive at experimentally relevant temperatures. Given that the tunability mechanism affects only the weak inter-chain coupling, the practical significance of the predictions is substantially limited unless the ordering temperature is addressed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section on inter-chain magnetic coupling] The text names 'CrBr3, VCl3 and MnBr3' as having FM inter-chain coupling, but Table 1 lists VBr3, not VCl3; this appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and throughout] The word 'neglectable' is used where 'negligible' is standard; this occurs in the abstract and in the discussion of inter-chain couplings.
  3. [Equation (1)] The Ising Hamiltonian is rendered with garbled characters (e.g., '𝐻=𝐻଴−ቀ௃భ'); it should be typeset properly.
  4. [Bethe-Slater discussion] The text refers to 'Fig. S12 [59]' when describing the Bethe-Slater curve; the Supplemental Material is reference [60], so the citation appears to be incorrect.
  5. [Throughout] There are minor typos: 'Bathe-Slater' should be 'Bethe-Slater', and 'V ASP' should be 'VASP'.
  6. [Fig. 2 caption] In the caption for Fig. 2, the red dashed box in (d) is described only as highlighting nodal-line electronic states; adding the location (e.g., along X-S) would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry-based classification and DFT band-structure predictions are self-consistent rather than tautological, with only a minor overstated stability claim

full rationale

The paper's central design rule—that altermagnetism appears under FM inter-chain coupling and is absent under AFM inter-chain coupling—follows from spin-group symmetry arguments applied to the four prototypes, not from fitting the band structures. The magnetic ground state is computed from an Ising model with exchange parameters J1–J3 obtained by total-energy differences, and the band splitting is then calculated for that magnetic state; this is a self-consistent predictive chain, not a circular one. The Hubbard U values are determined by linear response, not tuned to force altermagnetism. The eight material classifications do depend on very small J3 values (0.00–0.01 meV for several compounds), and the paper provides no convergence or U-sensitivity estimates, making the material-specific predictions fragile and a correctness risk; but fragility of a numerical result is not circularity. The abstract's phrase 'eight thermodynamically stable Q1D monolayers' is explicitly contradicted in the closing paragraph, which states that only dynamical stability is established and thermodynamic stability 'warrants further investigations [76]'; this is an internal inconsistency and overstated claim, but it does not amount to a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. No load-bearing self-citation chain appears: the cited prior works (e.g., reference [47] on CrCl3 chains and [65] on Bethe–Slater behavior) provide experimental or independent computational context, and are not invoked as the sole basis for the prediction. Thus the score is low, reflecting one minor overstated internal claim rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The predictions rely on five fitted Hubbard U parameters and the validity of the PBE-D3+U functional at meV energy scales. The symmetry-based classification is independent of these parameters, but the assignment of intrinsic vs extrinsic altermagnets and the spacing-driven transitions are not. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • U_Cr = 3.9 eV (J=1.1 eV)
    On-site Coulomb U for Cr d-orbitals, determined via linear response, used in DFT+U for all Cr-based monolayers.
  • U_V = 3.0 eV
    On-site Coulomb U for V d-orbitals in VBr3.
  • U_Mn = 4.9 eV
    On-site Coulomb U for Mn d-orbitals in MnBr3.
  • U_Co = 4.9 eV
    On-site Coulomb U for Co d-orbitals in CoTe3.
  • U_Fe = 3.9 eV
    On-site Coulomb U for Fe d-orbitals in FeCl3.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Spin-group symmetry analysis correctly identifies altermagnetism via broken P-T symmetry and C2x/Mx sublattice connections
    The paper relies on the literature definition of altermagnets (refs 13-16) and applies it to the Q1D prototypes.
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE-D3+U accurately captures the magnetic ground state and exchange couplings of these Q1D monolayers
    The central predictions follow from the computed J3 signs and band structures; no benchmark against experiments is given.
  • domain assumption The Ising model with nearest, second-nearest, and third-nearest exchange (J1-J3) describes the magnetic interactions
    Used to assign FM/AFM inter-chain coupling and to define intrinsic vs extrinsic altermagnets.
  • domain assumption Collinear magnetic order is sufficient; non-collinear or spin-orbit effects are negligible for the classification
    The paper restricts to collinear altermagnetic states; spin-orbit coupling is not explicitly considered in the classification.
  • domain assumption Inter-chain spacing can be varied experimentally without changing the chain structure (via pressure, nanotube radius, coverage)
    The tunability claim assumes experimental control over vdW gaps; references are cited but no demonstration for these specific materials.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable altermagnetism via inter-chain engineering in parallelassembled atomic chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MVJZKM7Z

@misc{pith2026250205785,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable altermagnetism via inter-chain engineering in parallelassembled atomic chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MVJZKM7Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05785}
}
abstract

Altermagnetism has recently drawn considerable attention in three- and twodimensional materials. Here, we extend this concept to quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) monolayers assembled from single-atomic magnetic chains. Through systematically examining nine types of structures, two stacking orders, and intra-/inter-chain magnetic couplings, we identify four out of thirty promising structural prototypes for hosting altermagnetism, which yields 192 potential monolayer materials. We further confirm eight thermodynamically stable Q1D monolayers via high-throughput calculations. Using symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we find that the existence of altermagnetism is determined by the type of inter-chain magnetic coupling and predict three intrinsic altermagnets,\(CrBr_3\),\(VBr_3\),\(MnBr_3\),due to their ferromagnetic inter-chain couplings and five extrinsic ones,\(CrF_3\),\(CrCl_3\),\(CrI_3\),\(FeCl_3\)and \(CoTe_3\), ascribed to their neglectable or antiferromagnetic inter-chain couplings. Moreover, the inter-chain magnetic coupling here is highly tunable by manipulating the inter-chain spacing, leading to experimentally feasible transitions between altermagnetic and nodal-line semiconducting states. In addition, applying external electric fields can further modulate the spin splitting. Our findings establish a highly tunable family of Q1D altermagnets, offering fundamental insights into the intricate relationship between geometry, electronic structure, and magnetism.These discoveries hold significant promises for experimental realization and future spintronic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05785 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The screening process of Q1D altermagnets. (b) Top view of spin density distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) The energy difference (E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Band dispersion plots of the highest valence band in freestanding CrCl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [76]

    Zong and W

    C. Zong and W. Ji, High-Throughput Prediction of Thermodynamically Stable 1D Transition Metal Chains, in preparation

    work page

  2. [1]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B 75, 115103 (2007)

    2007

  3. [2]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y . Yanagi, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat Commun 10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time- reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Science Advances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat Commun 12, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

Show all 76 references
  1. [8]

    Jiang, Z

    Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Zeng and Y .-J

    S. Zeng and Y .-J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorization using spin group theory, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054406 (2024)

    2024

  4. [11]

    X. Chen, Y . Liu, P. Liu, Y . Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 640,349-354 (2025)

    2025

  5. [12]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Representation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 15 031038 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials, 34 (49) 2409327, (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermagnetism: A Chemical Perspective, Journal of the American Chemical Society 147,3,2257-2274 (2025)

    2025

  10. [17]

    Y . Wu, L. Deng, X. Yin, J. Tong, F. Tian, and X. Zhang, Valley-Related Multipiezo Effect and Noncollinear Spin Current in an Altermagnet Fe2Se2O Monolayer, Nano Lett. 24, 10534 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    Y . Zhu, T. Chen, Y . Li, L. Qiao, X. Ma, C. Liu, T. Hu, H. Gao, and W. Ren, Multipiezo Effect in Altermagnetic V2SeTeO Monolayer, Nano Lett. 24, 472 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P.-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y . Lu, Quantum anomalous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnetism, Npj Comput Mater 9, 1 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum- dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. González-Hernández, I.Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D' Souza and O. Šipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral Magnons in Altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y . Feng, Y . J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y . Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan and C. Song, Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal and J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlová, J. Železný, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from a...

    2023

  18. [25]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y . Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B.G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J.Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers Degeneracy in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H.P. Nair, J.-X. Sun, X.S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y . Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat Electron 5, 267 (2022). 16

    2022

  20. [27]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V . Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. González-Hernández, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlová, Z. Šobáň, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D...

    2024

  21. [28]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645-650 (2025)

    2025

  23. [30]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y . Li, Y . Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y . Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y . Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu and F. Pan, Electrical 180° switching of Néel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Science Advances 10, ...

    2024

  24. [31]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y . Sun, Y . Huang, X. Zheng, Y . Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng and T. Qian , A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21,754-759 (2025)

    2025

  25. [32]

    Y .-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X. Liu, Y . Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, X.-M. Ma, Y .-J. Hao, M.-Y . Zhu, W. Liu, M. Zeng, S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, J. Ding, S. Mo, K. Tanaka, M. Arita, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, J. Wrachtrup, Y . Huang, R.- H. He, S. Qiao, Q. Liu and...

    2024

  26. [33]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y . Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y . Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y . Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin-valley locking in a layered room-temperatu...

    2025

  27. [34]

    Q. Liu, J. Kang, P. Wang, W. Gao, Y . Qi, J. Zhao, and X. Jiang, Inverse Magnetocaloric Effect in Altermagnetic 2D Non-van der Waals FeX (X = S and Se) Semiconductors, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2402080 (2024)

    2024

  28. [35]

    Guo, X.-S

    S.-D. Guo, X.-S. Guo, K. Cheng, K. Wang, and Y . S. Ang, Piezoelectric altermagnetism and spin-valley polarization in Janus monolayer Cr2SO, Applied Physics Letters 123, 082401 (2023)

    2023

  29. [36]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, Two-dimensional altermagnets from high throughput computational screening: Symmetry requirements, chiral magnons, and spin-orbit effects, Applied Physics Letters 124, 182409 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    K. Zou, Y . Yang, B. Xin, W. Wu, Y . Cheng, H. Dong, H. Liu, F. Luo, F. Lu, and W.-H. Wang, Monolayer M2X2O as potential 2D altermagnets and half-metals: a first principles study, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 055804 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206702 (2024). 17

    2024

  32. [39]

    Sheoran and S

    S. Sheoran and S. Bhattacharya, Nonrelativistic spin splittings and altermagnetism in twisted bilayers of centrosymmetric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L051401 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Sheng, J

    Y . Sheng, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and M. Wu, Ubiquitous van Der Waals Altermagnetism with Sliding/Moire Ferroelectricity, arXiv:2411.17493

    arXiv

  34. [41]

    S.-D. Guo, Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Valley polarization in twisted altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, L220402 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    W. Sun, H. Ye, L. Liang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and S.-S. Wang, Stacking-dependent ferroicity of a reversed bilayer: Altermagnetism or ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 110, 224418 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V

    R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V . K. Bharadwaj, T. Jungwirth, L. Šmejkal, and J. Sinova, Supercell altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094425 (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    Mazin, R

    I. Mazin, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Induced Monolayer Altermagnetism in MnP(S,Se)3 and FeSe, arXiv:2309.02355

    arXiv

  38. [45]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, R. Hu, S. Yan, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetism Induced by Sliding Ferroelectricity via Lattice Symmetry- Mediated Magnetoelectric Coupling, Nano Lett. 24, 11179 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    D. Wang, H. Wang, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Electric-Field-Induced Switchable Two-Dimensional Altermagnets, Nano Lett. 25, 1, 498-503 (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    S. Lu, D. Guo, Z. Cheng, Y . Guo, C. Wang, J. Deng, Y . Bai, C. Tian, L. Zhou, Y . Shi, J. He, W. Ji and C. Zhang, Controllable dimensionality conversion between 1D and 2D CrCl3 magnetic nanostructures, Nat Commun 14, 2465 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    Y . Li, A. Li, J. Li, H. Tian, Z. Zhang, S. Zhu, R. Zhang, S. Liu, K. Cao, L. Kang and Q. Li, Efficient Synthesis of Highly Crystalline One-Dimensional CrCl3 Atomic Chains with a Spin Glass State, ACS Nano 17, 20112 (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    Y . Lee, Y . W. Choi, K. Lee, C. Song, P. Ercius, M. L. Cohen, K. Kim, and A. Zettl, 1D Magnetic MX3 Single-Chains (M = Cr, V and X = Cl, Br, I), Advanced Materials 35, 2307942 (2023)

    2023

  43. [50]

    Jiang, C

    P. Jiang, C. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Zhong, Z. Yuan, Z.-Y . Lu, and W. Ji, Stacking tunable interlayer magnetism in bilayer CrI3, Phys. Rev. B 99, 144401 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    L. Wu, L. Zhou, X. Zhou, C. Wang, and W. Ji, In-plane epitaxy-strain-tuning intralayer and interlayer magnetic coupling in CrSe2 and CrTe2 monolayers and bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 106, L081401 (2022)

    2022

  45. [52]

    B. Li, Z. Wan, C. Wang, P. Chen, B. Huang, X. Cheng, Q. Qian, J. Li, Z. Zhang, G. Sun, B. Zhao, H. Ma, R. Wu, Z. Wei, Y . Liu, L. Liao, Yu. Ye, Y . Huang, X. Xu, X. Duan, W. Ji and X. Duan, Van der Waals epitaxial growth of air-stable CrSe2 nanosheets with thickness-tunable ma...

    2021

  46. [53]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  47. [54]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  48. [55]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  49. [56]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996). 18

    1996

  50. [57]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu, The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  51. [58]

    Vladimir I Anisimov, F Aryasetiawan, and A I Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+ U method, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 9, 767 (1997)

    1997

  52. [59]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA+U method, Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005)

    2005

  53. [60]

    See Supplemental Material at xx for symmetry analysis of other quasi-one- dimensional (Q1D) monolayer, considered magnetic configurations of single chain, phonon spectrums, magnetic moments, inter-chain cohesive energy and band structures of eight Q1D monolayer, inter-chain ma...

  54. [61]

    Shang, L

    C. Shang, L. Fu, S. Zhou, and J. Zhao, Atomic Wires of Transition Metal Chalcogenides: A Family of 1D Materials for Flexible Electronics and Spintronics, JACS Au 1, 147 (2021)

    2021

  55. [62]

    L. Fu, C. Shang, S. Zhou, Y . Guo, and J. Zhao, Transition metal halide nanowires: A family of one-dimensional multifunctional building blocks, Applied Physics Letters 120, 023103 (2022)

    2022

  56. [63]

    F. W. Boswell, A. Prodan, and J. K. Brandon, Charge-density waves in the quasi- one-dimensional compounds NbTe4 and TaTe4, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 16, 1067 (1983)

    1983

  57. [64]

    A. A. Balandin, F. Kargar, T. T. Salguero, and R. K. Lake, One-dimensional van der Waals quantum materials, Materials Today 55, 74 (2022)

    2022

  58. [65]

    C. Wang, X. Zhou, L. Zhou, Y . Pan, Z.-Y . Lu, X. Wan, X. Wang, and W. Ji, Bethe- Slater-curve-like behavior and interlayer spin-exchange coupling mechanisms in two-dimensional magnetic bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 102, 020402 (2020)

    2020

  59. [66]

    Z.-X. Hu, X. Kong, J. Qiao, B. Normand, and W. Ji, Interlayer electronic hybridization leads to exceptional thickness-dependent vibrational properties in few-layer black phosphorus, Nanoscale 8, 2740 (2016)

    2016

  60. [67]

    P.-J. Guo, C. Peng, Z.-X. Liu, K. Liu, and Z.-Y . Lu, Symmetry-enforced two- dimensional Dirac node-line semimetals, Mater. Futures 2, 011001 (2022)

    2022

  61. [68]

    Y . Guan, N. Liu, C. Wang, F. Pang, Z. Cheng, and W. Ji, Distance-dependent magnetization modulation induced by inter-superatomic interactions in Cr-doped Au6Te12Se8 dimers, Chinese Phys. B 33, 127502 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    Y . Fang, Y . Liu, N. Yang, G. Wang, W. He, X. Zhou, S. Xia, D. Wang, J. Fu, J. Wang, Y . Ding, T. Yu, C. Xu, L. Zhen, J. Lin, G. Gou, Y . Li, and F. Huang, Above- Room-Temperature Ferroelectricity and Giant Second Harmonic Generation in 1D vdW NbOI3, Advanced Materials 36, 24...

    2024

  63. [70]

    Qin, P.-Y

    J.-K. Qin, P.-Y . Liao, M. Si, S. Gao, G. Qiu, J. Jian, Q. Wang, S. Zhang, S. Huang, A. Charnas, Y . Wang, M. J. Kim, W. Wu, X. Xu, H.-Y . Wang, L. Yang, Y . Yap, P. 19 D. Ye, Raman response and transport properties of tellurium atomic chains encapsulated in nanotubes, Nat Ele...

    2020

  64. [71]

    S. L. Tait, A. Langner, N. Lin, S. Stepanow, C. Rajadurai, M. Ruben, an d K. Kern, One-Dimensional Self-Assembled Molecular Chains on Cu(100): Interplay between Surface-Assisted Coordination Chemistry and Substrate Commensurability, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 10982 (2007)

    2007

  65. [72]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scripta Materialia 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  66. [73]

    M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schröder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004)

    2004

  67. [74]

    Klimeš, D

    J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011)

    2011

  68. [75]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.