Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Spin alignment of quarkonia in vortical quark-gluon plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that spin-dependent dissociation of quarkonia in a vortical quark-gluon plasma explains the measured negative $J/\psi$ spin alignment.

desk verdict A real HTL calculation produces a sign-definite vortical dissociation mechanism for quarkonium spin alignment, but the paper never computes the magnitude, so the claim to explain the measured J/psi signal is not supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05866 v2 pith:VYWHAX3W submitted 2025-02-09 hep-ph nucl-exnucl-th

Yuhao Liang , Shu Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-exnucl-th
keywords spinalignmentquarkoniumJ/psivorticityquark-gluonplasmadissociationrateheavy-ioncollisionsquantumkinetictheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that the measured spin alignment of $J/\psi$ mesons in heavy-ion collisions can arise from spin-dependent dissociation in a vortical quark-gluon plasma. When the plasma rotates, its quarks and gluons are polarized, and the inelastic scattering that breaks up a $J/\psi$ proceeds at slightly different rates for the spin-1, spin-0, and spin-$(-1)$ states. Because survival is exponential, even a small rate splitting accumulates over the plasma lifetime and suppresses the spin-0 state relative to the average of the other two, giving a negative value of $\rho_{00}-1/3$. The sign is negative regardless of the size or sign of the vortical coupling, which matches the experimentally observed negative $J/\psi$ spin alignment. The calculation also finds no logarithmic enhancement in binding energy for the vortical correction, a structural consequence of the spin-dependent coupling needing one chromomagnetic and one chromoelectric vertex.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-projected self-energy of a heavy quark in a vortical quark-gluon plasma. The vorticity modifies the lesser propagators of light quarks and gluons, and the Coulomb-scattering contribution to the quark damping rate is projected onto a definite spin state along $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$. This yields the parametrization in Eq. 24, with the scalar functions $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ computed from HTL-resummed gluon propagators. The identity that carries the phenomenological conclusion is the exact cancellation $\Gamma_0^{(1)}=\Gamma_{1/2}^{(1)}+\Gamma_{-1/2}^{(1)}=0$ in the quasi-free picture, together with the concavity of the exponential survival factor $\exp(-\int\Gamma\,d\tau)$, which turns any rate splitting into a suppression of the spin-0 state.

What would settle it

Measure $\rho_{00}-1/3$ for $J/\psi$ in a collision energy and centrality where dissociation dominates over recombination: the mechanism predicts a negative value whose magnitude follows the vorticity integral, so a positive value would falsify it. A sharper model-level test is to recompute $\Gamma_0^{(1)}$ with unequal constituent momenta or a smeared wavefunction; a nonzero correction of the opposite sign would overturn the cancellation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in a quark-gluon plasma with vorticity $\boldsymbol{\omega}$, the dissociation rate of a quarkonium constituent in spin state $s=\pm1/2$ acquires a correction of the form $\Gamma_s^{(1)} = \Gamma_1\, s\, \hat{\mathbf{p}}\cdot\boldsymbol{\omega}\,(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{p}}) + \Gamma_2\, s\, \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\boldsymbol{\omega}$ (Eq. 24), where $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ is the quantization axis and $\hat{\mathbf{p}}$ the quarkonium momentum. In the quasi-free picture the quarkonium rate is the sum of the two constituent rates, so the spin-0 correction vanishes exactly, $\Gamma_0^{(1)}=0$ (Eq. 28). Feeding this into a dissociation-dominated Bjorken evolution with $\hat{\mathbf{n}}\parallel\boldsymbol{\omega}$ gives $\rho_{00}-1/3 \simeq -(1/9)(\int \Gamma_2\,d\tau)^2$ (Eq. 32), which is negative regardless of the sign of $\Gamma_2$. The paper therefore accounts for the negative $J/\psi$ spin alignment observed in experiments. It also finds that the vortical correction has no $\ln(T/\epsilon_b)$ enhancement, because a spin-dependent rate requires one chromomagnetic and one chromoelectric vertex, and the electric field is fully screened.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the quasi-free picture, in which the two constituent quarks of the $J/\psi$ scatter independently and with nearly equal momenta; if that is not true, the exact cancellation that makes the spin-0 correction vanish breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In dissociation-dominated collisions, $\rho_{00}-1/3$ is negative no matter the sign of the vortical coupling, with magnitude growing quadratically in the integrated $\Gamma_2$.
  • Since numerically $|\Gamma_2|\gg|\Gamma_1|$, the effect is almost independent of the quarkonium momentum direction and is set mainly by the angle between vorticity and the quantization axis.
  • The absence of a $\ln(T/\epsilon_b)$ enhancement means the vortical correction is not parametrically large; the time integral over the plasma evolution is what compensates for the small vorticity.
  • The $p$-dependence of $\rho_{00}-1/3$ plotted in Fig. 3 gives a concrete prediction to compare with future measurements of $J/\psi$ spin alignment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cancellation that sets $\Gamma_0^{(1)}=0$ depends on the two constituents carrying equal momenta; with a realistic bound-state wavefunction or unequal momenta a residual spin-0 correction would appear and could change the sign. The paper does not quantify this limit, so this is an inference beyond its claims.
  • Because the vortical correction lacks logarithmic enhancement, the predicted effect may be numerically modest; explaining the measured magnitude could require other gradients such as shear, or recombination contributions, that the paper leaves for future work.
  • A direct test would be to measure $J/\psi$ spin alignment at lower collision energies or in a centrality bin where dissociation dominates over recombination, and check whether the sign stays negative and whether the magnitude tracks the vorticity-integral formula.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism for J/psi spin alignment in heavy-ion collisions through spin-dependent dissociation of quarkonia in a vortical quark-gluon plasma. The authors compute the vortical correction to the quarkonium dissociation rate in the quasi-free picture, keeping only Coulomb scattering at leading logarithmic order in the binding energy and using HTL-resummed gluon propagators. They obtain a spin-dependent rate of the form Gamma_s^(1) = Gamma1 s phat·omega (n·phat) + Gamma2 s n·omega (Eq. 24), with the spin-0 combination cancelling exactly when the constituent quark and anti-quark carry the same momentum (Eq. 28). Implementing this in a Bjorken evolution model with a parametrized vorticity, they find rho00 - 1/3 is negative through the concavity of the exponential (Eq. 32), which is quoted as consistent with the observed J/psi spin alignment. The paper also reports the absence of a logarithmic enhancement in the binding energy for the vortical correction, tracing this to the need for one chromomagnetic and one chromoelectric coupling.

Significance. If the calculation is correct, this is a genuinely new mechanism for vector-meson spin alignment, distinct from the standard quark-polarization contribution, and it naturally produces a negative rho00-1/3. The derivation is technically substantial: the one-loop self-energy calculation is carried out in detail with explicit quark- and gluon-loop contributions, HTL propagators, and a transparent sign argument based on the concavity of the exponential. The absence of logarithmic enhancement in the vortical correction is an interesting and nontrivial theoretical result, and the paper provides a physical explanation for it. The main limitation is that the paper stops at sign consistency and does not provide a numerical magnitude for rho00-1/3; without that, the claim that this mechanism explains the observed J/psi spin alignment is incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (32) and Fig. 3] The paper never provides a numerical value for rho00-1/3. Eq. (32) expresses rho00-1/3 = -(1/9)(Integral Gamma2 dtau)^2, but the value of the integral is not reported; Fig. 3 has no axis scale or numeric labels. The central claim of consistency with the experimentally observed sign is therefore not backed by a quantitative estimate. Depending on the magnitude of Integral Gamma2 dtau, the effect could easily be orders of magnitude too small to explain the few-percent measured signal. Please give at least an order-of-magnitude estimate of rho00-1/3 and an axis scale for Fig. 3.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (28)] The exact cancellation Gamma_0^(1) = 0 in Eq. (28) relies on the quark and anti-quark carrying identical momentum p. The paper states in Sec. 3 that the constituents are 'supposed to carry close momenta in the quasi-free picture,' but this is not quantified, and the bound-state wavefunction necessarily smears the relative momentum. For p != p', the spin-0 rate receives a residual contribution (Gamma2(p)-Gamma2(p')) n·omega plus an analogous Gamma1 term, whose sign is not fixed by the concavity argument. This is a load-bearing point because the predicted negative sign is otherwise not robust. The authors should estimate the size of this residual from the momentum distribution of the J/psi and show that it does not change the sign.
  3. [Introduction, Ref. [29]] The paper states 'The measurement has found a spin alignment different from the counterpart of phi meson in sign [29],' implying that Ref. [29] reports J/psi spin alignment. However, Ref. [29] (M.S. Abdallah et al., Nature 614 (2023) 244) reports spin alignment of phi and K*0 mesons, not J/psi. The correct experimental reference and the measured value of rho00-1/3 for J/psi must be cited and used to ground the phenomenological claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Conclusion] In the concluding section, 'logrithmical' should be corrected to 'logarithmic'.
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3] Both figures lack axis labels and numeric scales; Fig. 2 is described as showing Gamma1 and Gamma2 as functions of p, epsilon_b, and T, but it is not clear which panel corresponds to which variable. Please add clear labels and units.
  3. [Eq. (29)] The units of the coefficients in the vorticity parametrization Eq. (29) are not stated, and the range of validity for sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV is not discussed. This would help readers assess the plausible values of the vorticity input.
  4. [Sec. 2.2, logarithmic enhancement discussion] The argument for the absence of the ln(T/epsilon_b) enhancement in the vortical correction is presented in a compressed manner; a more explicit statement of why the additional q0 factor removes the logarithmic divergence would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-dependent rates are computed from thermal field theory, and the claimed sign is a concavity identity, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The spin-dependent dissociation rate is obtained by calculating the vortical correction to the heavy-quark self-energy from HTL-resummed diagrams (Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (6)-(27)), with coefficients Γ1 and Γ2 evaluated from the explicit field-theoretic expressions rather than fitted to the spin alignment. The inputs αs=0.3, Nf=Nc=3, charm quark mass, εb=0.0233 GeV, T0=350 MeV, τ0=0.6 fm, and the vorticity profile (29) come from external hydrodynamic and quarkonium references, not from the target observable. The cancellation Γ0^(1)=0 in Eq. (28) follows from the calculated oddness Γ^(1)_(-s)=-Γ^(1)_s together with the quasi-free sum of constituent damping rates; it is not imposed by fitting. The negative sign of ρ00-1/3 in Eq. (32) is an exact mathematical property of exponential decay with equal and opposite rate shifts, as the paper itself states in the Introduction: 'Since exponential decay is a concave function, the splitting in the dissociation rate above leads to a suppressed rate of 0 state compared to the average of the other two. This is independent on the sign of Γ1 and Γ2.' This is a theorem from the model, not a quantity matched to experiment, and it does not depend on the numerically computed magnitude of Γ2. The self-citations [46] and [53] appear as background or validity references alongside independent external works and are not load-bearing. The absence of a numerical magnitude for ρ00-1/3, including the unscaled Fig. 3, is a completeness and quantitative-support concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard thermal field theory inputs and phenomenological modeling; no new entities are introduced. The key ad hoc modeling input is the equal-momentum quasi-free treatment that enforces the spin-0 cancellation.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha_s (strong coupling) = 0.3
    Chosen for numerical evaluation of Gamma1 and Gamma2; not fitted to spin alignment data.
  • epsilon_b (binding energy of J/psi at T=210 MeV) = 0.0233 GeV
    Taken from the weak binding scenario of Zhao-Rapp [57]; the result is sensitive to this value.
  • T0, tau0 (Bjorken initial temperature and time) = 350 MeV, 0.6 fm
    Standard initial conditions chosen for RHIC 200 GeV illustration; affect the integration range.
  • Vorticity parametrization Eq. (29) coefficients = Multiple constants from [59,60]
    Fit to hydrodynamic simulations in prior literature; the magnitude of rho00-1/3 scales with these coefficients.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quasi-free picture: quarkonium dissociation rate equals the sum of independent single-constituent damping rates.
    Used to convert the heavy-quark damping rate into quarkonium dissociation rate, Eq. (28).
  • domain assumption The vorticity correction modifies only on-shell light quark and gluon distributions; off-shell propagators are unchanged.
    Basis for the vortical corrections D^(1)< and S^(1)< in Eqs. (6)-(9).
  • domain assumption Leading-log accuracy permits keeping only Coulomb scattering; Compton scattering is dropped.
    The paper restricts to Coulomb scattering following [44], and acknowledges in the conclusion that a complete study requires Compton scattering.
  • ad hoc to paper Constituent quark and anti-quark carry close momenta p, so the spin-0 vortical correction cancels exactly.
    Used in Sec. 3 and Eq. (28) to obtain Gamma^(1)_0=0 and the negative spin alignment formula.
  • domain assumption The quantization axis n is parallel to the global vorticity omega.
    Required to reduce Eq. (24) to the simplified exponent in Eq. (32); appropriate for global spin alignment measured perpendicular to the event plane.
  • domain assumption Initial quarkonium spin states are equally populated (spin-independent initial distribution).
    Assumed in Eq. (31); a spin-dependent initial population would add a competing contribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin alignment of quarkonia in vortical quark-gluon plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VYWHAX3W

@misc{pith2026250205866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin alignment of quarkonia in vortical quark-gluon plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VYWHAX3W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05866}
}
abstract

The spin alignment of $J/\psi$ with respect to event plane in relativistic heavy ion collisions exhibits a significant signal. We propose a possible mechanism for spin alignment through spin dependent dissociation of quarkonia in a vortical quark-gluon plasma. The spin dependent dissociation is realized through inelastic scattering between constituents of quarkonium and those of quark-gluon plasma polarized by the vorticity. The spin dependent dissociation rate is found to depend on the directions of vorticity, quantization axis, and quark momentum. We implement our results in a dissociation dominated evolution model for quarkonia in the Bjorken flow, finding the spin $0$ state is slightly suppressed compared to the average of the other two, which is consistent with the sign found in experiments. We also find absence of logarithmic enhancement in binding energy in the vortical correction to dissociation rate, which is understood from the requirement that a spin dependent dissociation can only come from quark coupling to a pair of chromomagnetic and chromoelectric field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05866 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The self-energy diagrams for heavy quark. The cutted propagators can be put on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Γ1 and Γ2 defined in (24) as functions of p, ϵb and T respectively, with αs = 0.3, Nf = Nc = 3 and m taken to be charm quark mass. ϵb is temperature dependent. For simplicity, we take ϵb = 0.0233 GeV for an average temperature of 210 MeV corresponding to the weak binding scenario [57]. We find |Γ2| ≫ |Γ1| numerically, indicating the angular dependence of Γ(1) s is largely set by ω · n, with only a small correction f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spin alignment ρ00 − 1/3 as a function of p. For illustration purpose, we consider quarkonia spin alignment in collisions with √ sNN = 200 GeV. The temperature profile is modeled by Bjorken flow with T = T0  τ τ0 −1/3 , (30) with T0 = 350 MeV and τ0 = 0.6 fm. τ = √ t 2 − z 2 is the proper time. Given that |Γ1| ≪ |Γ2| numerically, we shall ignore the term dependent on quark momentum direction ˆp. Since the quark an… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tensor spin polarization induced by curved freeze-out hypersurface

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The curvature of the freeze-out hypersurface induces a tensor spin polarization of vector mesons at leading gradient order, with predicted phi-meson spin alignment around -10^-4 to -10^-3.

  2. Is the shear induced spin polarization non-dissipative?

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Shear-induced spin polarization leaves the momentum-integrated entropy production rate unchanged in chiral kinetic theory, but Zubarev's linear response suggests a dissipative origin.

  3. Polarization of the $\phi$ meson in the hadronic phase with nucleon scatterings and a viscous hydrodynamic background

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Kaon and nucleon rescattering plus viscous corrections in a Fluidum hydrodynamic background yield phi spin alignment consistent with zero, in disagreement with STAR data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [59]

    Jiang, Z.W

    Y. Jiang, Z.W. Lin , J.F. Liao, Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 94(4):044910, (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [29]

    Abdallah et al, Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions, Nature, 614(7947):244–248, (2023)

    M.S. Abdallah et al, Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions, Nature, 614(7947):244–248, (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Liang and X.N

    Z.T. Liang and X.N. Wang ， Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A + A colli- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 94:102301,(2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [2]

    Adamczyk et al,Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature, 548:62-65, (2017)

    L. Adamczyk et al,Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature, 548:62-65, (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [3]

    Becattini, V

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. D. Zanna et al, Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium, Annals Phys, 338:32-49, (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [4]

    Fang, L.G

    R.H. Fang, L.G. Pang, Q. Wang et al,Polarization of massive fermions in a vortical fluid, Phys. Rev. C, 94(2):024904, (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [5]

    H. Li, L.G. Pang, Q. Wang et al, Global Λ polarization in heavy-ion collisions from a transport model, Phys. Rev. C, 96(5):054908, (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [6]

    Adam et al, Polarization of Λ ( ¯Λ) hyperons along the beam direction in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adam et al, Polarization of Λ ( ¯Λ) hyperons along the beam direction in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett, 123(13):132301, (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 60 references
  1. [7]

    Fu, S.Y.F

    B. Fu, S.Y.F. Liu, L. Pang et al, Shear-Induced Spin Polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 127(14):142301, (2021)

    2021

  2. [8]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, G. Inghirami et al., Local Polarization and Isothermal Local Equi- librium in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 127(27):272302, (2021)

    2021

  3. [9]

    C. Yi, S. Pu , D.L. Yang, Reexamination of local spin polarization beyond global equilibrium in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 104(6):064901, (2021)

    2021

  4. [10]

    X.Y. Wu, C. Yi, G.Y. Qin et al, Local and global polarization of Λ hyperons across RHIC-BES energies: The roles of spin hall effect, initial condition, and baryon diffusion, Phys. Rev. C, 105(6):064909, (2022)

    2022

  5. [11]

    Lin , Z.Y

    S. Lin , Z.Y. Wang, Shear induced polarization: collisional contributions, JHEP, 12:030, (2022)

    2022

  6. [12]

    Lin , Z.Y

    S. Lin , Z.Y. Wang, Steady state, displacement current, and spin polarization for massless fermion in a shear flow, Phys. Rev. D, 111(3):034032, (2025)

    2025

  7. [13]

    Wang , S

    Z.Y. Wang , S. Lin, Spin polarization for massive fermion in a shear flow: Complete results at O(∂), Phys. Rev. D, 111(5):056023, (2025) 21

    2025

  8. [14]

    Fang , S

    S. Fang , S. Pu, Collisional corrections to spin polarization from quantum kinetic theory using Chapman-Enskog expansion, Phys. Rev. D, 111(3):034015, (2025)

    2025

  9. [15]

    Liang , X.N

    Z.T. Liang , X.N. Wang, Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions, Phys. Lett. B, 629:20–26, (2005)

    2005

  10. [16]

    Yang, R.H

    Y.G. Yang, R.H. Fang, Q. Wang et al., Quark coalescence model for polarized vector mesons and baryons, Phys. Rev. C, 97(3):034917, (2018)

    2018

  11. [17]

    Sheng, L

    X.L. Sheng, L. Oliva, Z.T. Liang et al., Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons in Heavy-Ion Colli- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 131(4):042304, (2023)

    2023

  12. [18]

    Sheng, S

    X.L. Sheng, S. Pu , Q. Wang, Momentum dependence of the spin alignment of the ϕ meson, Phys. Rev. C, 108(5):054902, (2023)

    2023

  13. [19]

    Kumar, B

    A. Kumar, B. M üller , D.L. Yang, Spin alignment of vector mesons by glasma fields, Phys. Rev. D, 108(1):016020, (2023)

    2023

  14. [20]

    Yang, Transverse and longitudinal spin alignment from color fields in heavy ion collisions, Phys

    D.L. Yang, Transverse and longitudinal spin alignment from color fields in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D, 111(5):056005, (2025)

    2025

  15. [21]

    Wagner, N

    D. Wagner, N. Weickgenannt , E. Speranza, Generating tensor polarization from shear stress, Phys. Rev. Res, 5(1):013187, (2023)

    2023

  16. [22]

    De Moura, K.J

    P.H. De Moura, K.J. Goncalves , G. Torrieri, Quarkonium spin alignment in a vortical medium, Phys. Rev. D, 108(3):034032, (2023)

    2023

  17. [23]

    K. Xu , M. Huang, Spin alignment of vector mesons induced by local spin density fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D, 110(9):094034, (2024)

    2024

  18. [24]

    Sheng, Y.Q

    X.L. Sheng, Y.Q. Zhao, S.W. Li et al., Holographic spin alignment for vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D, 110(5):056047, (2024)

    2024

  19. [25]

    B. Fu, F. Gao, Y.X. Liu et al., The spin alignment of vector mesons with light front quarks, Phys. Lett. B, 855:138821, (2024)

    2024

  20. [26]

    Zhao, X.L

    Y.Q. Zhao, X.L. Sheng, S.W. Li et al, Holographic spin alignment of J/ ψ meson in magnetized plasma, JHEP, 08:070, (2024)

    2024

  21. [27]

    Chen, Z.T

    J.H. Chen, Z.T. Liang, Y.G. Ma et al, Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron, 68(1):211001, (2025) 22

    2025

  22. [28]

    J.P. Lv, Z.H. Yu, Z.T. Liang et al, Global quark spin correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D, 109(11):114003, (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    Braun-Munzinger , J

    P. Braun-Munzinger , J. Stachel, (Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J/ ψ suppression, Phys. Lett. B, 490:196–202, (2000)

    2000

  24. [31]

    Zhao , R

    X.B. Zhao , R. Rapp, Transverse Momentum Spectra of J/ψ in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Lett. B, 664:253–257, (2008)

    2008

  25. [32]

    K. Zhou, N. Xu, Z. Xu et al, Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C, 89(5):054911, (2014)

    2014

  26. [33]

    Bhanot , M.E

    G. Bhanot , M.E. Peskin, Short Distance Analysis for Heavy Quark Systems. 2. Applications, Nucl. Phys. B, 156:391–416, (1979)

    1979

  27. [34]

    Peskin, Short Distance Analysis for Heavy Quark Systems

    M.E. Peskin, Short Distance Analysis for Heavy Quark Systems. 1. Diagrammatics. Nucl, Phys. B, 156:365–390, (1979)

    1979

  28. [35]

    Song , S.H

    T. Song , S.H. Lee, Quarkonium-hadron interactions in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D, 72:034002, (2005)

    2005

  29. [36]

    Chen , M

    S.L. Chen , M. He, Gluo-dissociation of heavy quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma reexam- ined, Phys. Rev. C, 96(3):034901, (2017)

    2017

  30. [37]

    Karsch, M.T

    F. Karsch, M.T. Mehr , H. Satz, Color Screening and Deconfinement for Bound States of Heavy Quarks, Z. Phys. C, 37:617, (1988)

    1988

  31. [38]

    Grandchamp , R

    L. Grandchamp , R. Rapp, Thermal versus direct J/ ψ production in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B, 523:60–66, (2001)

    2001

  32. [39]

    Grandchamp , R

    L. Grandchamp , R. Rapp, Charmonium suppression and regeneration from SPS to RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A, 709:415–439, (2002)

    2002

  33. [40]

    Chen , M

    S.L. Chen , M. He, Heavy quarkonium dissociation by thermal gluons at next-to-leading order in the Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Lett. B, 786:260–267, (2018)

    2018

  34. [41]

    Zhao , M

    S.X. Zhao , M. He, Second-order dissociation and transition of heavy quarkonia in the quark- gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D, 110(7):074040, (2024) 23

    2024

  35. [42]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri et al, Thermal width and gluo-dissociation of quarko- nium in pNRQCD, JHEP, 12:116, (2011)

    2011

  36. [43]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri et al, Thermal width and quarkonium dissociation by inelastic parton scattering, JHEP, 05:130, (2013)

    2013

  37. [44]

    Brambilla, M.A

    N. Brambilla, M.A. Escobedo, J. Ghiglieri et al, Heavy Quarkonium in a weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasma below the melting temperature, JHEP, 09:038, (2010)

    2010

  38. [45]

    X.J. Yao , B. M üller, Quarkonium inside the quark-gluon plasma: Diffusion, dissociation, recombination, and energy loss, Phys. Rev. D, 100(1):014008, (2019)

    2019

  39. [46]

    Chen , S

    Z.S. Chen , S. Lin, Polarized dissociation and spin alignment of moving quarkonia in a quark- gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D, 111(7):074002, (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    Peigne , A

    S. Peigne , A. Peshier, Collisional energy loss of a fast heavy quark in a quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D, 77:114017, (2008)

    2008

  41. [48]

    Braaten , M.H

    E. Braaten , M.H. Thoma, Energy loss of a heavy quark in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D, 44(9):R2625, (1991)

    1991

  42. [49]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. Pu, Q. Wang et al, Foundations and applications of quantum kinetic theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys, 127:103989, (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, First edition(Cambridge University Press,1996), p.129,194

    M.L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, First edition(Cambridge University Press,1996), p.129,194

    1996

  44. [51]

    Huang, P

    X.G. Huang, P. Mitkin, A. Sadofyev et al, Zilch Vortical Effect, Berry Phase, and Kinetic Theory, JHEP, 10:117, (2020)

    2020

  45. [52]

    Hattori, Y

    K. Hattori, Y. Hidaka, N. Yamamoto et al, Wigner functions and quantum kinetic theory of polarized photons, JHEP, 02:001, (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    Lin, Quantum kinetic theory for quantum electrodynamics, Phys

    S. Lin, Quantum kinetic theory for quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D, 105(7):076017, (2022)

    2022

  47. [54]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. Pu , D.L. Yang, Nonlinear Responses of Chiral Fluids from Kinetic Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 97(1):016004, (2018)

    2018

  48. [55]

    Gao, J.Y

    J.H. Gao, J.Y. Pang , Q. Wang, Chiral vortical effect in Wigner function approach, Phys. Rev. D, 100(1):016008, (2019) 24

    2019

  49. [56]

    D.F. Hou , S. Lin, Polarization Rotation of Chiral Fermions in Vortical Fluid, Phys. Lett. B, 818:136386, (2021)

    2021

  50. [57]

    Zhao , R

    X.B. Zhao , R. Rapp, Charmonium in Medium: From Correlators to Experiment, Phys. Rev. C, 82:064905, (2010)

    2010

  51. [58]

    Bodwin, E

    G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten , G.P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D, 51:1125–1171, (1995)

    1995

  52. [60]

    Deng , X.G

    W.T. Deng , X.G. Huang, Vorticity in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C, 93(6):064907, (2016) 25

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.