Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Large Tunable Thermoelectric Effects in Superconducting Spin Valves with Commercially Available Materials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a superconducting spin valve made of iron, magnesium oxide, and vanadium, switching the magnetic alignment changes the thermoelectric voltage by more than an order of magnitude, with a parallel-state Seebeck coefficient near 100…

desk verdict Solid qualitative spin-valve thermoelectric effect, but the headline 100 µV/K value rests on a ΔT estimate that is internally inconsistent by ~3x. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06962 v2 pith:6OJF3GTA submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.supr-con

Pablo Tuero , Johanne Bratland Tjernshaugen , Carlos Sanchez , César Gonzalez-Ruano , Yuan Lu , Jacob Linder , Farkhad G. Aliev This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductingspinvalvethermoelectricitySeebeckcoefficientvanadiumsuperconductorferromagnet/superconductorjunctionscryogenicthermoelectricgeneratormicromagneticsimulationspin-dependenttransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a magnetically switchable thermoelectric effect in superconducting spin valves built from iron, magnesium oxide, vanadium, and cobalt, materials that are commercially available and relatively easy to grow epitaxially. With the two ferromagnetic electrodes parallel, the junction converts a temperature difference of roughly 0.1–0.2 K into a thermovoltage corresponding to a Seebeck coefficient near 100 microvolts per kelvin at 0.3 K. Rotating the electrodes into the antiparallel configuration reduces the thermoelectric signal by more than an order of magnitude, which the authors identify as a large thermoelectric spin-valve effect. They reproduce the field dependence with a non-equilibrium quasiclassical Green's function calculation combined with micromagnetic simulations, and argue that this combination of large conversion factor, large magnetic modulation, and accessible materials meets the requirements for a practical tunable cryogenic thermoelectric generator.

What carries the argument

The working mechanism is the combination of a spin-split superconducting density of states in the vanadium film and spin-selective tunneling through the two MgO barriers. The proximity of the ferromagnetic electrodes creates spin splitting in the superconductor, while the MgO barriers filter spins with effective polarization above 0.7–0.8, so thermally excited electrons and holes see an asymmetric density of states around the Fermi energy and a net thermovoltage is generated. The magnitude of this thermovoltage is controlled by the angle between the two interface magnetizations, which is why the magnetic state of the spin valve sets the thermoelectric output. The theoretical work carries the argument through a self-consistent non-equilibrium quasiclassical Green's function (Usadel) calculation of the current under a temperature gradient, with the field-dependent magnetization angle supplied by micromagnetic simulations.

What would settle it

Embedding thin-film thermometers on both sides of the vanadium layer would measure the temperature difference directly and settle whether the reported parallel-state Seebeck coefficient near 100 microvolts per kelvin is accurate; a complementary check would be to replace the superconducting vanadium with a normal-metal spacer, which should eliminate the large magnetic modulation if superconducting spin splitting is the source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the thermoelectric response of a fully epitaxial Fe/MgO/V/MgO/Fe/Co junction is dominated by the relative magnetic alignment of its two ferromagnetic electrodes. In the parallel state, the measured thermovoltage divided by the estimated temperature difference gives a Seebeck coefficient of about 100 microvolts per kelvin, and this signal is more than ten times larger than the antiparallel-state signal. The effect disappears above the superconducting critical temperature of the vanadium film (4.7 K), tying the thermovoltage to the superconducting state. The authors show that the mechanism is a spin-dependent electron-hole asymmetry in the spin-split superconductor combined with spin-dependent transmission through the MgO barriers, and that the magnetic-field dependence reflects the field-driven rotation and domain motion of the ferromagnetic layers.

Load-bearing premise

The temperature difference across the junction is estimated from a one-dimensional heat-diffusion model using tabulated thermal conductivities and a manufacturer's LED radiation pattern, rather than measured, and the reported Seebeck coefficient is obtained by dividing the measured voltage by that estimated value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A cryogenic heat-to-voltage converter can be switched between high- and low-output states by an in-plane magnetic field of about 0.1–0.2 tesla, without changing the temperature gradient.
  • The effect stays magnetically switchable over a useful temperature range: the theory predicts the parallel/antiparallel Seebeck ratio remains above ten for base temperatures below about two kelvin.
  • Because the superconducting film is vanadium with a critical temperature of 4.7 K, the device operates in a standard helium-3 cryostat rather than requiring dilution temperatures.
  • The physical ingredients are general: an epitaxial spin-filtering barrier and a spin-split superconductor, so the design offers a path toward optimizing thermoelectric output through interface polarization, spin-mixing conductance, and superconductor length.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that the same junction could serve as a probe of magnetic texture, since the thermovoltage responds to domain-wall formation and motion at the interfaces, not only to the average magnetization angle.
  • Because the thermovoltage grows with interface polarization and spin mixing, replacing vanadium with a higher-gap superconductor such as niobium could plausibly raise both the output and the operating temperature, provided the epitaxial Fe/MgO interfaces can be preserved.
  • The large modeled parallel/antiparallel ratio below two kelvin suggests these junctions could be integrated into superconducting-qubit refrigerator circuits as magnetically controlled heat valves, though the estimated temperature-drop uncertainty would need to be removed for quantitative engineering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports thermoelectric voltage measurements in epitaxial Fe/MgO/V/MgO/Fe/Co spin-valve junctions, finding a decrease of more than an order of magnitude in the zero-bias thermovoltage when the ferromagnetic electrodes switch from parallel to antiparallel alignment, with the signal disappearing above the superconducting critical temperature Tc = 4.7 K. The authors estimate the temperature difference across the junction from a one-dimensional heat-diffusion model and, using that estimate, report a parallel-state Seebeck coefficient of about 100 microvolts per kelvin at 0.3 K. The experiment is supplemented by micromagnetic MuMax3 simulations and self-consistent Keldysh-Usadel Green's function calculations, which reproduce the qualitative field dependence of both the magnetoresistance and the thermovoltage.

Significance. If the quantitative calibration is corrected, the experiment would demonstrate a strong, magnetically switchable cryogenic thermoelectric effect in a material stack based on commonly used elements. The raw Delta-V(H) data and its disappearance above Tc are compelling and indicate a real physical effect. The theoretical framework is well established, and the combination of non-equilibrium Keldysh-Usadel theory with micromagnetic simulations is a strength of the paper. However, the absolute Seebeck value is currently tied to an unmeasured and internally inconsistent thermal model, so the headline claim of a Seebeck coefficient exceeding 100 microvolts per kelvin is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplemental Section II, Eq. (7), Table I] The stated value k_eq = 11.57 W/(m.K) is inconsistent with the layer conductivities and thicknesses listed in Table I. From the tabulated values one obtains sum(d_i/k_i) = 45/70 + 2.3/0.1 + 40/10 + 2.3/0.4 + 10/70 + 20/100 nm/(W/m.K) ≈ 33.7 x 10^-9 m^2.K/W, and with L = 119.6 nm this gives k_eq ≈ 3.6 W/(m.K), not 11.57 W/(m.K). Since Delta-T = qL/k_eq, the modeled Delta-T values in Fig. S3(c) are underestimated by about a factor of 3.3 if the series sum is correct. Consequently the parallel-state Seebeck coefficient would be roughly 30-40 microvolts per kelvin rather than about 100 microvolts per kelvin, and the claim of exceeding 100 microvolts per kelvin would not be supported. Conversely, if the stated k_eq was actually used in the calculations, then Table I or the tuned MgO conductivity must be revised. The authors should either measure Delta-T directly or present a corrected k_eq, state the resulting range of S, and adjust the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  2. [Experimental results, Fig. 2 and Methods] The quantitative claims, including the parallel-state Seebeck coefficient and the factor-of-ten modulation, are presented without error bars, multi-device statistics, or repeated thermal-cycling data. The raw Delta-V(H) trace shows a clear effect, but the absence of any uncertainty estimate makes the absolute calibration impossible to assess. The authors should state how many nominally identical devices were measured, show representative reproducibility, and quantify the uncertainty associated with the V_OFF background subtraction that defines Delta-V.
  3. [Thermoelectricity via non-equilibrium quasiclassical theory, Figs. 4-5 and Supplemental Section IV] The comparison between theory and experiment is only qualitative, and the theory contains several adjustable parameters: the spin-mixing conductance G_phi/G_0 = 2.75, the Dynes broadening delta/Delta_0 = 0.01, the RKKY coupling -0.5 mJ/m^2, the interface-to-bulk conductance G_0/G = 1/3.5, the polarization p = 0.8, the micromagnetic defect concentrations, and the top-MgO thermal-conductivity multiplier. This is not circular, because the experiment is independent of the theory, but the quoted agreement does not provide quantitative support for the magnitude of the thermoelectric effect. A sensitivity analysis over the fitted parameters is needed to show which qualitative features, such as the sign of the magnetoresistance, the overshoot, and the P/AP ratio, are robust to parameter choices.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Discussion and Supplemental Section V] The statement that the large Seebeck coefficient 'remains large and more than an order of magnitude greater than in the AP configuration as the base temperature is increased' is a theoretical prediction from Fig. S7, not an experimental observation; the wording in the main text should be clarified.
  2. [Fig. 2(a)] Only an upward magnetic-field sweep is shown for the thermovoltage; presenting both sweep directions would clarify whether the sharp AP-to-P transition and overshoot are hysteretic.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'commercially available materials' should be made precise: the elemental materials are commercially available, but the MBE-grown epitaxial stacks described here are not off-the-shelf products; a phrase such as 'based on commonly used materials' would be more accurate.
  4. [Supplemental Section II, Table I] The factor-of-four increase in the top MgO thermal conductivity is a significant tuning parameter that directly affects k_eq and hence Delta-T; its basis and uncertainty should be discussed in more detail.
  5. [Supplemental Eq. (22)] The notation '1.76/T/T_c' is ambiguous; the dimensionless temperature ratio should be written explicitly, for example as (1.76 k_B T / Delta_0) or with parentheses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the >10x magnetic modulation is a direct voltage measurement, while the ~100 uV/K absolute scale is a model-calibrated quantity with an internal Delta-T inconsistency that is a correctness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central experimental result is the raw thermovoltage Delta-V changing by more than a factor of 10 between AP and P states; this quantity is measured directly under zero current bias and does not depend on the thermal model, so it is not circular. The absolute Seebeck coefficient S = Delta-V/Delta-T is obtained by dividing by a model-derived Delta-T (Supplement Sec. II). Neither Delta-T nor the model parameters were fitted to force S: the heat flux is computed from the LED I-V curve and manufacturer radiation pattern, and k_eq is stated to be 11.57 W/mK. However, applying Eq. (7) to Table I gives sum(d_i/k_i) ~ 33.7 nm/(W/mK) and k_eq ~ 3.5 W/mK, so the stated k_eq is internally inconsistent with the table by about a factor of 3; this affects the absolute S value but is a correctness/calibration problem, not a circular reduction of S to its inputs. The theoretical comparison uses G_phi/G0 = 2.75, delta/Delta0 = 0.01, and RKKY = -0.5 mJ/m^2, which the paper explicitly labels as fitting parameters or choices made for qualitative agreement; since these are acknowledged fits rather than disguised predictions, the 'qualitative agreement' is not circular. The self-citations (Refs. 7, 24-26) are to prior experimental and theoretical work and are not used as a uniqueness theorem or to forbid alternatives. Therefore no step of the derivation is equivalent by construction to its input; the score reflects only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation in the thermal-conductivity tuning.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental measurement is independent of the listed parameters. However, the theory and the thermal model rely on several numbers chosen to reproduce the observed curves. None of the listed free parameters is independently predicted, and none corresponds to a newly invented physical entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Spin-mixing conductance ratio Gphi/G0 = 2.75
    Explicitly described as a fitting parameter in the main text (Thermoelectricity via non-equilibrium quasiclassical theory); controls the spin splitting that drives the thermovoltage.
  • Dynes broadening delta/Delta0 = 0.01
    Supplemental Section IV chooses this value because larger reported Dynes parameters reduce the thermoelectric effect; the text says 'our choice gives a qualitatively better match with the experimental thermovoltage measurements'.
  • RKKY interlayer coupling = -0.5 mJ/m^2
    Micromagnetic simulations tested -0.5 to -2 mJ/m^2; -0.5 gave MR curves qualitatively similar to experiment (Figure 3b).
  • Interface-to-bulk conductance G0/G = 1/3.5
    Input to the Usadel calculation; not derived from an independent measurement in the paper.
  • Micromagnetic defect concentrations = 25% surface, 10% bulk
    Chosen to mimic disorder; affects the calculated angle difference and MR curves.
  • Top MgO thermal conductivity multiplier = 4x
    Supplemental Table I: 'the top MgO barrier is expected to be ~4 times more transparent than the bottom one, so we have proportionally tuned its thermal conductivity'; this affects the Delta-T estimate used for the Seebeck coefficient.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math BCS gap-temperature relation Delta0/kBTc = 1.76
    Used to convert dimensionless temperatures and voltages to numerical values in the Usadel calculation.
  • domain assumption Usadel equation and diffusive limit are valid for the 40 nm vanadium layer
    The central transport model relies on an elastic mean free path much shorter than other scales; this is not directly verified for this film.
  • domain assumption Spin-active boundary conditions with m = m' and interface polarization p = 0.8
    Interface model from Eschrig et al.; p = 0.8 is from Fe/MgO literature rather than measured in this specific stack.
  • domain assumption Most of the temperature and voltage drops occur across the interfaces and the superconducting region
    The main text explicitly justifies comparing the measured stack thermovoltage to a theoretical superconductor-only thermovoltage with this assumption.
  • domain assumption Weak antiferromagnetic RKKY coupling between the Fe layers
    Produces the antiparallel state at zero field; the coupling sign and magnitude are set in the micromagnetic model rather than measured directly.
  • domain assumption 1D heat diffusion with tabulated thermal conductivities models the LED-induced temperature profile
    Used to estimate Delta-T; there is no direct thermometry in the experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Tunable Thermoelectric Effects in Superconducting Spin Valves with Commercially Available Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OJF3GTA

@misc{pith2026250206962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Tunable Thermoelectric Effects in Superconducting Spin Valves with Commercially Available Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OJF3GTA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06962}
}
abstract

Recent studies have revealed magnetically controllable thermoelectric effects in superconductor/ferromagnet (S/F) structures. A tunable cryogenic thermoelectric generator needs not only a high conversion factor between electricity and heat, but also a large change in the thermoelectric output when switching the magnetic state of the device. However, the reported modifications in thermoelectric power are either minimal, involve superconductors with relatively low critical temperatures (below 1 K), or do not utilize commercially available spintronic materials. Here, we experimentally measure and numerically model thermoelectric effects in fully epitaxial F/S/F junctions based on commercially available, easily grown materials, as well as their dependence on the magnetic configuration of the F electrodes. We observe sizeable Seebeck coefficients for the parallel alignment of the ferromagnetic electrodes, reaching values of about $100$~$\mu$V/K. Importantly, we find a decrease of the thermoelectric signal of more than an order of magnitude when switching from a parallel to an antiparallel configuration, constituting a large thermoelectric spin-valve effect. Theoretical modeling based on a self-consistent non-equilibrium Keldysh-Usadel Green's function theory, combined with micromagnetic simulations, qualitatively reproduce the experimental findings. The thermoelectric effect is optimized when there is a large spin-dependent electron-hole asymmetry in the superconductor combined with spin-dependent transmission through the interfaces. These findings pave the way for the development of efficient and versatile cryogenic thermoelectric heat engines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the F/S/F junctions when heated by a light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Thermoelectric response of a F/S/F junction as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Angle difference between the macrospin of the two F regions for an AF coupling of RKKY [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The model used in the numerical calculations. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The thermovoltage dependence on (a) the ratio of the bulk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fundamental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale,

    Giuliano Benenti, Giulio Casati, Keiji Saito, and Robert S Whitney, “Fundamental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale,” Physics Reports 694, 1–124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [3]

    Narrow band in the intermetallic compounds MNiSn (M=Ti, Zr, Hf)),

    F. G. Aliev, V . V . Kozyrkov, V . V . Moshchalkov, R. V . Scolozdra, and K. Durcewski, “Narrow band in the intermetallic compounds MNiSn (M=Ti, Zr, Hf)),” Zeit. Phys. Cond. Mat. 80, 353 (1990)

    work page 1990

  3. [4]

    Advancement in half-heusler thermoelectric materials and strate- gies to enhance the thermoelectric performance,

    Abhigyan Ojha, Rama Krushna Sabat, and Sivaiah Bathula, “Advancement in half-heusler thermoelectric materials and strate- gies to enhance the thermoelectric performance,” Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 171, 107996 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [5]

    Thermoelectric Phenomena, Materials, and Appli- cations,

    T. M. Tritt, “Thermoelectric Phenomena, Materials, and Appli- cations,” Ann. Rev. Mat. Research 41, 433 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [6]

    Review of current high-ZT thermoelectric materials,

    J. Wei, L. Y ang, Z. Ma, P . Song, M. Zhang, J. Ma, F. Y ang, and X. Wang, “Review of current high-ZT thermoelectric materials,” J. Mat. Sci. 55, 12642 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [7]

    A review on recent developments of thermo- electric materials for room-temperature applications,

    Zohreh Soleimani, Stamatis Zoras, Boris Ceranic, Sally Shahzad, and Yuanlong Cui, “A review on recent developments of thermo- electric materials for room-temperature applications,” Sustain- able Energy Technologies and Assessments 37, 100604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [8]

    Advanced ther- moelectric design: From materials and structures to devices,

    Xiao-Lei Shi, Jin Zou, and Zhi-Gang Chen, “Advanced ther- moelectric design: From materials and structures to devices,” Chem. Rev. 120, 7399–7515 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [9]

    Advance- ments in thermoelectric materials: A comprehensive review,

    Syed Irfan, Zhiyuan Y an, and Sadaf Bashir Khan, “Advance- ments in thermoelectric materials: A comprehensive review,” Materials Science for Energy Technologies 7, 349–373 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 71 references
  1. [10]

    Low-temperature thermoelectric materials and applications,

    Jianghe Feng, Juan Li, and Ruiheng Liu, “Low-temperature thermoelectric materials and applications,” Nano Energy 126, 109651 (2024)

    2024

  2. [11]

    Ther- moelectric cooling at cryogenic temperatures,

    S. R. Harutyunyan, V . H. Vardanyan, A. S. Kuzanyan, V . R. Nikoghosyan, S. Kunii, K. S. Wood, and A. M. Gulian, “Ther- moelectric cooling at cryogenic temperatures,” Applied Physics Letters 83, 2142–2144 (2003)

    2003

  3. [12]

    Micrometre-scale refrigerators,

    Juha T Muhonen, Matthias Meschke, and Jukka P Pekola, “Micrometre-scale refrigerators,” Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 046501 (2012)

    2012

  4. [13]

    Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic- insulator structures,

    T. Heikkil¨a, M. Silaev, M. Virtanen, and F. S. Bergeret, “Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic- insulator structures,” Prog. Surf. Sci. 94, 100540 (2019)

    2019

  5. [14]

    Nonlocal thermoelec- tric effects and nonlocal onsager relations in a three-terminal proximity-coupled superconductor-ferromagnet device,

    P . Machon, M. Eschrig, and W. Belzig, “Nonlocal thermoelec- tric effects and nonlocal onsager relations in a three-terminal proximity-coupled superconductor-ferromagnet device,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 047002 (2013)

    2013

  6. [15]

    Predicted very large thermoelectric effect in ferromagnet- superconductor junctions in the presence of a spin-splitting magnetic field,

    A. Ozaeta, P . Virtanen, F. S. Bergeret, and T. T. Heikkil ¨a, “Predicted very large thermoelectric effect in ferromagnet- superconductor junctions in the presence of a spin-splitting magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 057001 (2014)

    2014

  7. [16]

    Observation of thermoelectric currents in high-field superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions,

    S. Kolenda, M. J. Wolf, and D. Beckmann, “Observation of thermoelectric currents in high-field superconductor-ferromagnet tunnel junctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097001 (2016)

    2016

  8. [17]

    Thermoelectric effect in altermagnet-superconductor junctions,

    Pavlo O. Sukhachov, Erik Wegner Hodt, and Jacob Linder, “Thermoelectric effect in altermagnet-superconductor junctions,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 094508 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Nonlinear ther- moelectricity with electron-hole symmetric systems,

    G Marchegiani, A Braggio, and F Giazotto, “Nonlinear ther- moelectricity with electron-hole symmetric systems,” Physical review letters 124, 106801 (2020)

    2020

  10. [19]

    Bipolar thermo- electric josephson engine,

    Gaia Germanese, Federico Paolucci, Giampiero Marchegiani, Alessandro Braggio, and Francesco Giazotto, “Bipolar thermo- electric josephson engine,” Nature Nanotechnology 17, 1084– 1090 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    Quantum harvester enables energy transfer without randomness transfer or dissipation,

    Fei Meng, Junhao Xu, Xiangjing Liu, and Oscar Dahlsten, “Quantum harvester enables energy transfer without randomness transfer or dissipation,” (2024), arXiv:2406.08054 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Thermodynamic limitations on fault-tolerant quantum computing,

    Mykhailo Bilokur, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Shayan Ma- jidy, “Thermodynamic limitations on fault-tolerant quantum computing,” (2024), arXiv:2411.12805 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Thermoelectric radiation detector based on superconductor-ferromagnet systems,

    T. T. Heikkil¨a, R. Ojaj¨arvi, I. J. Maasilta, E. Strambini, F. Giazotto, and F. S. Bergeret, “Thermoelectric radiation detector based on superconductor-ferromagnet systems,” Physical Review Applied 10 (2018), 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.034053

    2018 doi

  14. [23]

    Enhanced thermal rectification in coupled qutrit–qubit quantum thermal diode,

    Anuradhi Rajapaksha, Sarath D. Gunapala, and Ma- lin Premaratne, “Enhanced thermal rectification in coupled qutrit–qubit quantum thermal diode,” APL Quantum 1 (2024), 10.1063/5.0237842

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    Superconducting spintronic heat engine,

    C. I. L . de Araujo, P . Virtanen, M. Spies, C. Gonzlaez-Orellana, M. I. Kerschbaumer, C. Rogero, T. T. Heikkil ¨a, F. Giazotto, and E. Strambini, “Superconducting spintronic heat engine,” Nat. Commun. 15, 4823 ((2024)) . 9

    2024

  16. [25]

    Complete magnetic control over the superconducting thermoelectric effect,

    Jabir Ali Ouassou, C ´esar Gonz ´alez-Ruano, Diego Caso, Farkhad G. Aliev, and Jacob Linder, “Complete magnetic control over the superconducting thermoelectric effect,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 094514 (2022)

    2022

  17. [27]

    See Supplemental Material, which includes Refs. [ 49–65], for additional details on the experimental characterization of the samples, modeling of the temperature profile, micromagnetic simulations, quasiclassical theory, and the temperature depen- dence of the thermoelectric effect

  18. [29]

    Superconductivity-induced change in mag- netic anisotropy in epitaxial ferromagnet-superconductor hybrids with spin-orbit interaction,

    C´esar Gonz ´alez-Ruano, Lina G. Johnsen, Diego Caso, Coriolan Tiusan, Michel Hehn, Niladri Banerjee, Jacob Linder, and Farkhad G. Aliev, “Superconductivity-induced change in mag- netic anisotropy in epitaxial ferromagnet-superconductor hybrids with spin-orbit interaction,” Ph...

    2020

  19. [30]

    Spatial dispersion of spin susceptibility of conduction electrons in a superconductor,

    B. Kochelaev, L. Tagirov, and M. Khusainov, “Spatial dispersion of spin susceptibility of conduction electrons in a superconductor,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 76, 578 (1979)

    1979

  20. [31]

    Multicritical points in the phase diagrams of layered ferromagnet-superconductor structures,

    M. Khusainov, “Multicritical points in the phase diagrams of layered ferromagnet-superconductor structures,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 109, 524 (1996)

    1996

  21. [32]

    Nodal superconducting exchange coupling,

    A. Di Bernardo, S. Komori, G. Livanas, G. Divitini, P . Gentile, M. Cuoco, and J. W. A. Robinson, “Nodal superconducting exchange coupling,” Nature Materials 18, 1194–1200 (2019)

    2019

  22. [33]

    Spin texture and spin-orbit coupling contributions in spin-triplet superconductivity,

    Pablo T uero, C´esar Gonz ´alez-Ruano, Yuan Lu, Coriolan Tiusan, and Farkhad G. Aliev, “Spin texture and spin-orbit coupling contributions in spin-triplet superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 094504 (2024)

    2024

  23. [34]

    Electron interference in a normal metal induced by superconducting contracts,

    JM Rowell and WL McMillan, “Electron interference in a normal metal induced by superconducting contracts,” Physical Review Letters 16, 453 (1966)

    1966

  24. [35]

    Superconducting properties of vanadium films,

    N. E. Alekseevskii, V . M. Sakosarenko, K. Bl¨ uthner, and H.-J. K¨ohler, “Superconducting properties of vanadium films,” Physica Status Solidi (a) 34, 541–546 (1976)

    1976

  25. [36]

    Giant tunneling magnetoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tunnel barriers,

    S. S. P . Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P . M. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S.-H. Y ang, “Giant tunneling magnetoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tunnel barriers,” Nat. Mater. 3, 862 (2004)

    2004

  26. [37]

    Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions,

    S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y . Suzuki, and K. Ando, “Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions,” Nat. Mater. 3, 868 (2004)

    2004

  27. [38]

    Role of metal-oxide interface in determining the spin polarization of magnetic tunnel junctions,

    Jose Maria De Teresa, Agn`es Barth´el´emy, Albert Fert, Jean Pierre Contour, Fran c ¸ois Montaigne, and Pierre Seneor, “Role of metal-oxide interface in determining the spin polarization of magnetic tunnel junctions,” Science 286, 507–509 (1999) , https://www.science.org/doi/p...

    1999 doi

  28. [39]

    Interface and transport properties of fe/v/mgo/fe and fe/v/fe/mgo/fe magnetic tunneling junctions,

    Xiaobing Feng, O. Bengone, M. Alouani, I. Rungger, and S. Sanvito, “Interface and transport properties of fe/v/mgo/fe and fe/v/fe/mgo/fe magnetic tunneling junctions,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 214432 (2009)

    2009

  29. [40]

    Interfacial spin-orbit coupling: A platform for superconducting spintronics,

    Isidoro Mart´ınez, Petra H¨ogl, C´esar Gonz´alez-Ruano, Juan Pedro Cascales, Coriolan Tiusan, Yuan Lu, Michel Hehn, Alex Matos- Abiague, Jaroslav Fabian, Igor ˇZuti´c, and Farkhad G. Aliev, “Interfacial spin-orbit coupling: A platform for superconducting spintronics,” Phys. Re...

    2020

  30. [41]

    The design and verification of MuMax3,

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garc ´ıa- S´anchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, “The design and verification of MuMax3,” AIP Advances 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  31. [42]

    Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications,

    B. Dieny and M. Chshiev, “Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications,” Reviews of Modern Physics 89 (2017), 10.1103/revmodphys.89.025008

    2017 doi

  32. [45]

    Theory of superconductivity,

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, “Theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 108, 1175–1204 (1957)

    1957

  33. [46]

    overshoot

    in the superconductor. This is done self-consistently for the superconducting order parameter. When the Usadel equation is solved, the current /u1D43C (Δ/u1D449 ) is calculated. The thermovoltage is determined by solving /u1D43C (Δ/u1D449 ) = 0. In the simulations, we use the ...

    2024

  34. [48]

    thesis, Universidad Aut ´onoma de Madrid (2023)

    C ´esar Gonz ´alez-Ruano Iriarte, Proximity effects in epitaxial su- perconductor/ferromagnet junctions with spin-orbit interaction, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Aut ´onoma de Madrid (2023)

    2023

  35. [52]

    Effect of neutron irradiation on the low-temperature specific heat and thermal conductivity of magnesium oxide,

    J. W . Gardner and A. C. Anderson, “Effect of neutron irradiation on the low-temperature specific heat and thermal conductivity of magnesium oxide,” Phys. Rev. B 23, 1988–1991 (1981)

    1981

  36. [61]

    Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor,

    Nils Schopohl and Kazumi Maki, “Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 52, 490– 493 (1995). 10

    1995

  37. [66]

    High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors,

    Nadia Ligato, Giampiero Marchegiani, Pauli Virtanen, Elia Strambini, and Francesco Giazotto, “High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors,” Scientific reports 7, 8810 (2017). Supplemental Material for Large tunable thermoelec...

    2017

  38. [67]

    Substitute the value found for m6: mi =q/ki

    thatkimi =k6m6. Substitute the value found for m6: mi =q/ki. (5) 3 Constants of the 1D model k1 kF e x1 45 nm k2 kM gO x2 − x1 2.3 nm k3 kV x3 − x2 40 nm k4 4kM gO x4 − x3 2.3 nm k5 kF e x5 − x4 10 nm k6 kCo x6 − x5 20 nm kF e = 70 [3]; kM gO = 0.1 [4]; kV = 10 [5]; kCo = 100 ...

  39. [68]

    The colors indicate the layers and materials of the heterostructures

    (b) Temperature profiles for the different VLED relevant to our experiments. The colors indicate the layers and materials of the heterostructures. For the values of VLED of 7.1, 7.0 and 6.8 V the applied current ILED is 100, 65 and 30 mA, respectively. (c) The estimated temperat...

  40. [69]

    Spin tunnelling phenomena in single-crystal magnetic tunnel junction systems,

    C Tiusan, F Greullet, M Hehn, F Montaigne, S Andrieu, and A Schuhl, “Spin tunnelling phenomena in single-crystal magnetic tunnel junction systems,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 165201 (2007)

    2007

  41. [70]

    Observation of magnetic state dependent thermoelectricity in superconducting spin valves,

    C´esar Gonz ´alez-Ruano, Diego Caso, Jabir Ali Ouassou, Cori- olan Tiusan, Yuan Lu, Jacob Linder, and Farkhad G. Aliev, “Observation of magnetic state dependent thermoelectricity in superconducting spin valves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 237001 (2023)

    2023

  42. [71]

    A review on steels for cryogenic applications,

    C. R. Anoop, R. K. Singh, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, M. Jayalak- shmi, T. Antony Prabhu, K. Thomas Tharian, and S. V . S. Narayana Murty, “A review on steels for cryogenic applications,” Materials Performance and Characterization 10, 16–88 (2021)

    2021

  43. [72]

    Effect of neutron irradiation on the low-temperature specific heat and thermal conductivity of magnesium oxide,

    J. W . Gardner and A. C. Anderson, “Effect of neutron irradiation on the low-temperature specific heat and thermal conductivity of magnesium oxide,” Phys. Rev. B 23, 1988–1991 (1981). 9

    1981

  44. [73]

    Thermal conductivity of pure vanadium in normal, supercon- ducting, and mixed states,

    B K Chakal’skii, N A Red’ko, S S Shalyt, and V M Azhazha, “Thermal conductivity of pure vanadium in normal, supercon- ducting, and mixed states,” Sov. Phys. - JETP (Engl. Transl.); (United States) 48:4 (1978)

    1978

  45. [74]

    Thermal conductivity and electrical resistivity of pure polycrystalline cobalt in the temperature range 2.5-30 k,

    K. Balcerek, R. Wawryk, Cz. Marucha, J. Rafalowicz, and L. Krajczyk, “Thermal conductivity and electrical resistivity of pure polycrystalline cobalt in the temperature range 2.5-30 k,” International Journal of Thermophysics 17, 1475–1482 (1996)

    1996

  46. [75]

    Symmetry broken spin reorien- tation transition in epitaxial mgo/fe/mgo layers with competing anisotropies,

    Isidoro Mart ´ınez, Coriolan Tiusan, Michel Hehn, Mairbek Chshiev, and Farkhad G. Aliev, “Symmetry broken spin reorien- tation transition in epitaxial mgo/fe/mgo layers with competing anisotropies,” Scientific Reports 8, 9463 (2018)

    2018

  47. [76]

    Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe-MgO- Fe sandwiches,

    W. H. Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. Ma- cLaren, “Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe-MgO- Fe sandwiches,” Physical Review B 63 (2001), 10.1103/phys- revb.63.054416

    2001 doi

  48. [77]

    Magnetocrystalline anisotropy constants of iron at room temperature and below,

    C. D. Graham, “Magnetocrystalline anisotropy constants of iron at room temperature and below,” Phys. Rev. 112, 1117–1120 (1958)

    1958

  49. [78]

    Conductance and exchange coupling of two ferromagnets separated by a tunneling barrier,

    J. C. Slonczewski, “Conductance and exchange coupling of two ferromagnets separated by a tunneling barrier,” Phys. Rev. B 39, 6995–7002 (1989)

    1989

  50. [79]

    Colloquium: Nonequilibrium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field,

    F. S. Bergeret, M. Silaev, P . Virtanen, and T. T. Heikkil ¨a, “Colloquium: Nonequilibrium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 041001 (2018)

    2018

  51. [80]

    Quasiclassical Green’s func- tion approach to mesoscopic superconductivity,

    Wolfgang Belzig, Frank K. Wilhelm, Christoph Bruder, Gerd Sch ¨on, and Andrei D. Zaikin, “Quasiclassical Green’s func- tion approach to mesoscopic superconductivity,” Superlattices Microstruct. 25, 1251–1288 (1999)

    1999

  52. [81]

    On the energy spectrum of superconductors,

    L. P . Gorkov, “On the energy spectrum of superconductors,”Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 505–508 (1958)

    1958

  53. [82]

    Quasiclassical Green’s function approach to mesoscopic super- conductivity,

    W . Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, G.d Sch¨on, and A. D. Zaikin, “Quasiclassical Green’s function approach to mesoscopic super- conductivity,” Superlatt. Microstruct. 25, 1251–1288 (1999)

    1999

  54. [83]

    Superconductivity: Conventional and unconventional superconductors,

    Venkat Chandrasekhar, “Superconductivity: Conventional and unconventional superconductors,” (Springer, Berlin, 2008) Chap. 8, pp. 279–313

    2008

  55. [84]

    Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for type II superconductors into transport-like equations,

    Gert Eilenberger, “Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for type II superconductors into transport-like equations,” Z. Phys. 214, 195–213 (1968)

    1968

  56. [85]

    Generalized diffusion equation for supercon- ducting alloys,

    Klaus D. Usadel, “Generalized diffusion equation for supercon- ducting alloys,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 507–509 (1970)

    1970

  57. [86]

    Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor,

    Nils Schopohl and Kazumi Maki, “Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 52, 490– 493 (1995)

    1995

  58. [87]

    Su- perconducting proximity effect through a magnetic domain wall,

    Alexander Konstandin, Juha Kopu, and Matthias Eschrig, “Su- perconducting proximity effect through a magnetic domain wall,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 140501(R) (2005)

    2005

  59. [88]

    Voltage-induced thin-film superconductivity in high magnetic fields,

    Jabir Ali Ouassou, Tom Doekle Vethaak, and Jacob Linder, “Voltage-induced thin-film superconductivity in high magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 144509 (2018)

    2018

  60. [89]

    Physical Properties of Nanosystems: Synchronized Andreev transmission in chains of SNS junctions,

    N. M. Chtchelkatchev, T. I. Baturina, A. Glatz, and V . M. Vinokur, “Physical Properties of Nanosystems: Synchronized Andreev transmission in chains of SNS junctions,” (Springer, Y alta, 2009) Chap. 7, pp. 87–107

    2009

  61. [90]

    General bound- ary conditions for quasiclassical theory of superconductivity in the diffusive limit: Application to strongly spin-polarized systems,

    M. Eschrig, A. Cottet, W . Belzig, and J. Linder, “General bound- ary conditions for quasiclassical theory of superconductivity in the diffusive limit: Application to strongly spin-polarized systems,” New J. Phys. 17, 083037 (2015)

    2015

  62. [91]

    Characterization of super- conducting single-electron transistors with small Al/AlOx/V josephson junctions,

    Hiroshi Shimada, Kenji Miyawaki, Ayano Hagiwara, Kouichi Takeda, and Y oshinao Mizugaki, “Characterization of super- conducting single-electron transistors with small Al/AlOx/V josephson junctions,” Superconductor Science and Technology 27, 115015 (2014)

    2014

  63. [92]

    High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors,

    Nadia Ligato, Giampiero Marchegiani, Pauli Virtanen, Elia Strambini, and Francesco Giazotto, “High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors,” Scientific reports 7, 8810 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.