Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Conformal Freeze-in Dark Matter: 5D Dual and Phase Transition

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A warped 5D dual shows conformal freeze-in dark matter's confinement transition completes promptly.

desk verdict A genuinely new 5D holographic construction for COFI dark matter, but the phase-transition completion claim is conditional on a quartic radion term that is put in by hand and on a favorable choice of its coefficient; the abstract also overstates coverage by ignoring the unanalyzed d<2 and vector-mediator branches. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06965 v2 pith:FYWCGX4S submitted 2025-02-10 hep-ph

Lillian Luo , Maxim Perelstein This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords conformalfreeze-indarkmatterAdS/CFTcorrespondenceRandall-Sundrummodelradionstabilizationholographicdualphasetransitionsector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conformal freeze-in (COFI) identifies dark matter with a bound state of a dark conformal field theory that confines at a keV–MeV gap scale. This paper constructs the holographic dual of that dark sector as a Randall–Sundrum-like 5D model whose UV and IR brane positions encode the electroweak and gap scales, with a bulk scalar sourced by the Higgs portal serving to stabilize the brane separation. The construction splits the parameter space into two branches of boundary CFTs, one with operator dimension $d>2$ and one with $1

What carries the argument

The central object is the holographic radion potential for the dark sector, constructed from a bulk scalar zero mode in the RS-like 5D geometry. The scalar field $\Phi$ is the AdS/CFT dual of the CFT operator $\mathcal{O}_{CFT}$, with a small UV-brane tadpole $\gamma k^{5/2}\Phi$ representing the Higgs-portal deformation; the zero-mode boundary conditions at the two branes produce a potential $V_{\rm eff}(\chi)=24M_5^3 k^3(\lambda\chi^4 - \lambda_\pm \mu_{UV}^{4\mp 2\nu}\chi^{\pm 2\nu})$ that fixes the radion VEV $\chi=1/z_1$ and hence the gap scale $M_{\rm gap}$. The quartic term $\lambda\chi^4$ is included as the effect of mismatched UV and IR brane tensions, and the consistency condition $\lambda\sim 0.01{-}0.1$ ensures that the dilaton is light and the gravitational backreaction is small. The same potential, evaluated against the deconfined AdS-Schwarzschild free energy and a thin-wall bounce action, carries the phase-transition argument.

What would settle it

Compute the quartic coefficient $\lambda$ directly from the UV and IR brane tensions and the bulk action of Eq. (4.3); if the resulting $\lambda$ falls outside the $0.01$–$0.1$ range the paper uses for consistency and bounce minimization, the prompt-completion conclusion for the allowed parameter space must be re-evaluated. Alternatively, a full numerical bounce calculation at benchmark parameters near $T\sim T_c$ would falsify the claim if it gives a bounce action above the Hubble-limited bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core discovery is that the COFI dark sector admits a weakly coupled 5D holographic description, and that in this description the confining phase transition is generically mild. The dual is an RS-like slice of AdS5 with SM fields on a TeV-scale UV brane, the DM and other CFT bound states on an MeV-scale IR brane, and a bulk scalar field $\Phi$ whose mass is set by the CFT operator dimension $d$ through $d(d-4)=m^2$. Depending on the UV brane mass, the dual corresponds to one of two boundary CFT branches, with dimensions $d=2+\nu$ and $d=2-\nu$; the resulting radion potentials have the forms $V(\chi)=24M_5^3 k^3(\lambda \chi^4 - \lambda_+ \mu_{UV}^{4-2\nu}\chi^{2\nu})$ and $V(\chi)=24M_5^3 k^3(\lambda \chi^4 - \lambda_- \mu_{UV}^{4+2\nu}\chi^{-2\nu})$, respectively. The confinement transition is then analyzed by comparing the radion potential, standing for the confined phase, with the AdS-Schwarzschild black-brane free energy of the deconfined phase. With the bounce action required to be below the Hubble-limited bound (about 190 for the MeV gap scale), the paper finds that for a small number of CFT degrees of freedom the phase transition completes for most of the allowed Higgs-portal parameter space with a scalar mediator, and that for a moderately larger number of degrees of freedom the same happens provided the nucleation temperature is about a third of the critical temperature or lower.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-transition result assumes that the radion potential contains a quartic term $\lambda\chi^4$, a term attributed to mismatched brane tensions but not derived from the 5D action; the vacuum, dilaton mass, and bounce action all depend on this free parameter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the $d>2$ scalar-mediator Higgs-portal branch, the allowed COFI parameter space with a small number of dark-sector degrees of freedom is not destabilized by the confinement transition: bubbles nucleate promptly and radiation domination is maintained.
  • For a moderately larger number of degrees of freedom, the transition still completes for essentially the same parameter space once the nucleation temperature is $T\lesssim 0.3 T_c$, so no additional relic-density constraints appear in that regime.
  • The vector-mediator COFI realization lies entirely in the $1<d<2$ branch, whose radion potential is singular at $\chi\to 0$; the paper therefore applies no phase-transition bounds to it, leaving its viability unresolved.
  • Because the dark sector is colder than the SM and the transition is not strongly supercooled, its gravitational-wave signal has $\alpha\sim 10^{-4}$ and is too feeble for current pulsar-timing arrays; explaining the observed PTA signal would require a different or more supercooled transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct 5D derivation of the quartic coefficient $\lambda$ from the brane tensions could change the bounce action; if $\lambda$ is forced outside the $0.01$–$0.1$ range by the geometry, the prompt-completion window either widens or closes, so computing $\lambda$ is the natural next check.
  • The singular behavior of the $d_-$ branch potential suggests that vector-mediator COFI may not be describable by the same bubble-nucleation picture at all; if so, that branch needs either a different confinement mechanism or a genuine exclusion.
  • Prompt completion without supercooling means no long inflationary phase, so the model's observational signatures remain DM self-interaction and structure-formation probes rather than gravitational waves; combining those probes with phase-transition-completion bounds can sharpen the surviving parameter region.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a 5D Randall-Sundrum-type holographic dual of the Conformal Freeze-In (COFI) dark matter scenario, with the SM on a TeV-scale UV brane and the dark-sector bound states on an MeV-scale IR brane. The CFT operator OCFT is dualized to a bulk scalar with a UV tadpole, and the radion potential is computed in two branches corresponding to the two AdS boundary conditions for the bulk scalar. The resulting dilaton potential is matched to the 4D spurion result of the COFI literature, and the model is extended to a three-brane setup that also generates the Planck/electroweak hierarchy. As an application, the paper analyzes the cosmological confinement phase transition using the radion potential for the confined phase and an AdS-Schwarzschild free energy for the deconfined phase. The central claim is that, for the d>2 branch of the Higgs-portal scalar-mediator COFI model, the phase transition completes promptly without significant supercooling over most of the allowed parameter space.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful addition to the COFI program: it provides a weakly coupled 5D description of the strongly coupled dark CFT, derives the radion potential for both AdS boundary branches, and addresses a previously unstudied cosmological consistency condition, namely that the dark-sector confinement transition must complete rather than leave the universe in a supercooled/de Sitter phase. The paper contains several genuinely analytic deliverables: the two-boundary-theory analysis in Sec. 4.1, the radion stabilization potentials in Eqs. (4.25)-(4.30), the explicit dilaton kinetic term in Appendix A, and the bounce-action estimate in Sec. 5. The phase transition calculation is an independent consequence of the radion potential and the AdS-Schwarzschild free energy, not a fit to the desired conclusion. The principal weakness is that the PT-completion result depends on a quartic radion term that is introduced by hand, and the analysis is restricted to the d>2 branch; these issues are load-bearing for the headline claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.25)-(4.27) and Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.4)-(5.6)] The quartic term lambda chi^4 in Eq. (4.26) is inserted rather than derived. The 5D action in Eqs. (4.1)-(4.4) contains a bulk cosmological constant, tuned brane tensions, and a bulk scalar with quadratic brane potentials plus the linear tadpole gamma k^{5/2} Phi; no brane-tension detuning parameter and no Phi^4 term appear there. The sentence 'We include a chi^4 term generated from the mistuning of the UV and IR brane tension' does not specify which term produces it or what fixes its coefficient. This is not a minor technicality: the Higgs-like stabilization of the radion at large chi, the dilaton mass in Eq. (4.34), and the bounce action in Eq. (5.6), which scales as lambda^{-3/4}, all depend on this term, and Sec. 5 then chooses lambda to saturate Eq. (3.8) and the EFT-validity bound, i.e. the largest allowed value. If a first-principles derivation from brane-tension mistuning gives a smaller or negative lambda, the conclusion that the PT completes without significant supercooling is not established. The authors should derive lambda from the 5D brane data (or at minimum identify the detuned-tension term and its allowed range) and scan over it rather than optimizing it away.
  2. [Sec. 5, first two paragraphs and footnote 4] The phase transition analysis is carried out only for the d+ branch (d>2). The d- branch potential in Eq. (4.30) is singular as chi -> 0, so the authors explicitly exclude 1<d<2 from the bounce calculation, and footnote 4 states that the vector-mediator COFI case lies entirely in the d- branch and therefore receives no PT bounds. However, the abstract and the final section claim that the paper finds 'the viable parameter space of the theory which allows the phase transition to complete promptly,' without this restriction. Since the original COFI parameter space includes 1<d<2 and the vector-mediator model, the headline claim is broader than the analysis. The abstract and conclusions should be qualified to the d>2, Higgs-portal scalar-mediator case, or the d- branch should be analyzed with a regularization of the singular limit.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.2)-(5.3)] The normalization of the deconfined-phase free energy should be checked and stated explicitly. Eq. (5.2) is written as F_deconf = V0 - 2 pi^4 (M5^3/k^3) T^4, while the confined-phase potential in Eq. (4.32) has prefactor 24 M5^3/k^3. Combining these with V0 = 3 N^2 lambda (2-nu)/(2 nu) <chi>^4 and N^2 = 16 pi^2 (M5/k)^3 gives a pi^2 factor in V0, whereas the same quantity computed directly from the chi -> 0 limit of Eq. (4.32) has no pi^2. The authors should confirm that Eq. (5.2) and Eq. (5.3) use the same normalization convention, since the critical temperature and the bounce action are sensitive to this factor.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.31)] The notation with '±' and '∓' in Eqs. (4.31)-(4.32) is hard to parse; it would help to write the d+ and d- cases explicitly or to state the sign conventions in one sentence.
  2. [Sec. 5, text near Fig. 5] The choice lambda saturating Eq. (3.8) should be stated in the figure caption and in the parameter benchmark, not only in the text, because the displayed PT-completion regions are best-case values under an undetermined quartic coefficient.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase 'without significant supercooling' is supported only in the thin-wall, minimal-supercooling regime; the paper should note in the abstract or conclusions that the analysis assumes prompt completion and does not exclude strongly supercooled trajectories for parameter values not shown.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors (e.g., 'at lease' in Sec. 1, 'AdS-Schwartzchild' and 'corrrect' in Sec. 5 and the Fig. 6 caption) that should be corrected in a final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase-transition analysis is an independent consequence of the stated 5D potential and free energies; self-citations supply input parameter ranges rather than the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's new result is that the COFI confinement transition can complete promptly without significant supercooling. This is derived from the radion effective potential (Eqs. 4.26 and 4.32), the AdS-Schwarzschild deconfined-phase free energy (Eq. 5.2), and the thin-wall bounce action (Eqs. 5.5-5.6). No parameter is fitted to force this outcome: the bounce action is computed for benchmark mistunings and for lambda chosen to saturate the stated consistency bound (Eq. 3.8), and the conclusion is presented as a viable-region statement conditional on that bounded free parameter, not as a unique prediction. The paper does rely on earlier same-group papers [1,4] for the COFI relic-density region, dark matter self-interaction constraints, and the allowed d, Mgap ranges; these are legitimate external inputs used to delimit the parameter space, not outputs of the present derivation. The matching of the 5D gap scale to Eq. (3.7) is a consistency check of the holographic dictionary rather than a circular reduction. The weakest step is the quartic term in Eq. (4.26), stated to be generated from brane-tension mistuning, since Eq. (4.1) contains tuned tensions and no derivation of lambda is shown; this is a missing-derivation or robustness concern, not a circularity, because the PT calculation takes that term as an explicit assumption and the paper itself notes that the bounce action scales as lambda^(-3/4). Accordingly, no circular step satisfying the quote-and-reduction standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central results depend on the AdS/CFT dictionary and on several standard but unproven modeling choices: the χ^4 radion term, the AdS-Schwarzschild deconfined phase, and the thin-wall bounce. Free parameters are the soft-breaking tadpole γ, the quartic λ, the two brane mass mistunings, and the CFT degree count N. No new particles or forces are introduced beyond the existing COFI setup.

free parameters (5)
  • γ (UV brane tadpole coupling) = small, such that ⟨χ⟩ ~ MeV
    Sets the hierarchy between TeV and MeV scales; chosen by hand as the soft conformal symmetry breaking parameter (Sec. 4.2).
  • λ (radion quartic coefficient) = 0.01-0.1
    Free coefficient of the χ^4 term; tuned to satisfy dilaton lightness and small backreaction constraints, and it controls the bounce action (Sec. 4.2, Sec. 5).
  • τUV (UV mass mistuning) = τUV=3 for d>2; τUV≈0 for d<2
    Dimensionless brane mass mistuning; benchmark choice affects the radion potential shape and stability (Sec. 4.2).
  • τIR (IR mass mistuning) = τIR=-4ν/100
    Chosen benchmark to keep the lightest KK mode heavy so it is not excited during the phase transition (Sec. 5).
  • N (number of CFT degrees of freedom) = N=5, 20
    Scanned values entering the bounce action bound via the Hubble rate and the free energy normalization (Sec. 5).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps the strongly coupled dark CFT to a weakly coupled 5D RS-like theory.
    Section 4 invokes this duality to identify the bulk scalar with the CFT operator and the IR brane with confinement; not proven within the paper.
  • domain assumption Small backreaction of the bulk scalar on the AdS geometry, so the RS metric and the probe-scalar radion potential are valid.
    Section 4.2 assumes this and verifies it holds for mild λ tuning, but it is an approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper A χ^4 term in the radion potential is generated by brane tension mistuning, with free coefficient λ.
    Eq. (4.26) adds λχ^4 without deriving it from the 5D action in Eq. (4.3); adopted from the RDS literature.
  • domain assumption The deconfined phase is described by the AdS-Schwarzschild solution with free energy F_deconf(T)=V0-2π^4(M5^3/k^3)T^4.
    Section 5 uses this standard holographic result, citing Refs. [9,14,15].
  • domain assumption The confinement phase transition proceeds by O(3)-symmetric bubble nucleation with the thin-wall bounce action.
    Section 5 uses Eq. (5.5) and compares to numerical bounce results, but the thin-wall approximation restricts the analysis to T close to Tc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conformal Freeze-in Dark Matter: 5D Dual and Phase Transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FYWCGX4S

@misc{pith2026250206965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conformal Freeze-in Dark Matter: 5D Dual and Phase Transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FYWCGX4S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06965}
}
abstract

Conformal Freeze-in (COFI) scenario postulates a dark sector described by a conformal field theory (CFT) at energies above the ``gap scale" in the keV$-$MeV range. At the gap scale, the dark CFT undergoes confinement, and one of the resulting bound states is identified as the dark matter candidate. In this paper, we study this model in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence with a focus on the mechanism of the infrared (IR) breaking of conformal invariance in the dark sector. We construct the holographic dual to the conformal dark sector, given by a Randall-Sundrum-like model in 5D, where the Standard Model (SM) fields and the dark matter candidate are placed on the ultraviolet (UV) and IR branes respectively. The separation between the UV and IR branes is stabilized by a bulk scalar field, naturally generating a hierarchy between the electroweak scale and the gap scale. We find that the parameter space of COFI comprises two distinct branches of CFT's living on the Anti-de-Sitter (AdS) boundary, each corresponding to a different UV boundary condition. The two branches of CFT's result in different radion potentials. The confinement of the CFT is dual to the spontaneous symmetry breaking by the 5D radion potential. We then use this dual 5D setup to study the cosmological confining phase transition in the dark sector. We find the viable parameter space of the theory which allows the phase transition to complete promptly without significant supercooling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing Confining Dark Sectors with Cosmological Perturbations

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Composite dark matter from a keV–MeV confining phase transition sources an IR-enhanced curvature spectrum that competes with free-streaming suppression, yielding concrete CMB and Lyman-α bounds on transition strength ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [20]

    Relevant dilaton stabilization,

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi, and A. Ismail, “Relevant dilaton stabilization,” JHEP 06 (2023) 202, arXiv:2301.10247 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Conformal Freeze-In of Dark Matter,

    S. Hong, G. Kurup, and M. Perelstein, “Conformal Freeze-In of Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 9, (2020) 095037, arXiv:1910.10160 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    General freeze-in and freeze-out,

    M. Redi and A. Tesi, “General freeze-in and freeze-out,” JHEP 12 (2021) 060, arXiv:2107.14801 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Conformal freeze-in, composite dark photon, and asymmetric reheating,

    W. H. Chiu, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, “Conformal freeze-in, composite dark photon, and asymmetric reheating,” JHEP 03 (2023) 172, arXiv:2209.10563 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Dark matter from a conformal Dark Sector,

    S. Hong, G. Kurup, and M. Perelstein, “Dark matter from a conformal Dark Sector,” JHEP 02 (2023) 221, arXiv:2207.10093 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Conformal Freeze-In from Neutrino Portal,

    S. Hong, M. Perelstein, and T. Youn, “Conformal Freeze-In from Neutrino Portal,” arXiv:2412.00181 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370–3373, arXiv:hep-ph/9905221

    arXiv 1999

  8. [7]

    Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, “Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,” JHEP 04 (2001) 021, arXiv:hep-th/0012248. – 17 –

    arXiv 2001

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Holography and phenomenology,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, “Holography and phenomenology,” JHEP 08 (2001) 017, arXiv:hep-th/0012148

    2001 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Holography and the electroweak phase transition,

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, “Holography and the electroweak phase transition,” JHEP 03 (2002) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0107141

    2002 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,

    L. Randall and G. Servant, “Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,” JHEP 05 (2007) 054, arXiv:hep-ph/0607158

    2007 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale,

    T. Konstandin and G. Servant, “Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale,” JCAP 12 (2011) 009, arXiv:1104.4791 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [12]

    QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition,

    B. von Harling and G. Servant, “QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition,” JHEP 01 (2018) 159, arXiv:1711.11554 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    The Supercooled Universe,

    P. Baratella, A. Pomarol, and F. Rompineve, “The Supercooled Universe,” JHEP 03 (2019) 100, arXiv:1812.06996 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement,

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum, “Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement,” JHEP 05 (2020) 086, arXiv:1910.06238 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension,

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum, “Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension,” JHEP 02 (2021) 051, arXiv:2010.04083 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Status of electroweak baryogenesis in minimal composite Higgs,

    S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi, and G. Servant, “Status of electroweak baryogenesis in minimal composite Higgs,” JHEP 08 (2023) 012, arXiv:2212.11953 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    New horizons in the holographic conformal phase transition,

    C. Er¨ oncel, J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, G. Rigo, and B. Sambasivam, “New horizons in the holographic conformal phase transition,” Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 8, (2024) 794, arXiv:2305.03773 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology,

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall, “Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology,” JHEP 12 (2023) 036, arXiv:2309.10090 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall, “Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,” JHEP 06 (2024) 099, arXiv:2401.09633 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, “Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,” Phys. Lett. B475 (2000) 275–279, arXiv:hep-ph/9911457

    2000 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, “Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4922–4925, arXiv:hep-ph/9907447

    1999 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  16. [24]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556 (1999) 89–114, arXiv:hep-th/9905104

    1999 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Scalar field theory in the AdS / CFT correspondence revisited,

    P. Minces and V. O. Rivelles, “Scalar field theory in the AdS / CFT correspondence revisited,” Nucl. Phys. B 572 (2000) 651–669, arXiv:hep-th/9907079

    2000 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Double-trace deformations, mixed boundary conditions and functional determinants in AdS/CFT,

    T. Hartman and L. Rastelli, “Double-trace deformations, mixed boundary conditions and functional determinants in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 01 (2008) 019, arXiv:hep-th/0602106

    2008 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Conformality Lost,

    D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Conformality Lost,” Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 125005, arXiv:0905.4752 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cosmological Quasiparticles and the Cosmological Collider,

    J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, H. Li, and B. Sambasivam, “Cosmological Quasiparticles and the Cosmological Collider,” arXiv:2408.08951 [astro-ph.CO]. – 18 –

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Many brane extension of the Randall-Sundrum solution,

    H. Hatanaka, M. Sakamoto, M. Tachibana, and K. Takenaga, “Many brane extension of the Randall-Sundrum solution,” Prog. Theor. Phys.102 (1999) 1213–1218, arXiv:hep-th/9909076

    1999 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Radion in multibrane world,

    I. I. Kogan, S. Mouslopoulos, A. Papazoglou, and L. Pilo, “Radion in multibrane world,” Nucl. Phys. B 625 (2002) 179–197, arXiv:hep-th/0105255

    2002 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Multiple hierarchies from a warped extra dimension,

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki, “Multiple hierarchies from a warped extra dimension,” JHEP 02 (2022) 050, arXiv:2109.10938 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Multi-brane cosmology,

    S. Girmohanta, S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki, “Multi-brane cosmology,” JHEP 07 (2023) 182, arXiv:2304.05586 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Multifield Polygonal Bounces,

    V. Guada, A. Maiezza, and M. Nemevˇ sek, “Multifield Polygonal Bounces,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 5, (2019) 056020, arXiv:1803.02227 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek, and M. Pintar, “FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,” Comput. Phys. Commun.256 (2020) 107480, arXiv:2002.00881 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L8, arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

    H. Xu et al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,” Res. Astron. Astrophys.23 no. 7, (2023) 075024, arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

    D. J. Reardon et al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L6, arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,

    NANOGrav Collaboration, A. Afzal et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L11, arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,

    C. Caprini et al., “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,” JCAP 04 (2016) 001, arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,

    C. Caprini et al., “Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,” JCAP 03 (2020) 024, arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Forbidden conformal dark matter at a GeV,

    S. Ferrante, A. Ismail, S. J. Lee, and Y. Lee, “Forbidden conformal dark matter at a GeV,” JHEP 11 (2023) 186, arXiv:2308.16219 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015005, arXiv:hep-ph/0602229

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Dynamical Soft-Wall AdS/QCD,

    B. Batell and T. Gherghetta, “Dynamical Soft-Wall AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 026002, arXiv:0801.4383 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Electroweak Breaking on a Soft Wall,

    A. Falkowski and M. Perez-Victoria, “Electroweak Breaking on a Soft Wall,” JHEP 12 (2008) 107, arXiv:0806.1737 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Soft-Wall Stabilization,

    J. A. Cabrer, G. von Gersdorff, and M. Quiros, “Soft-Wall Stabilization,” New J. Phys.12 (2010) 075012, arXiv:0907.5361 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Cosmological Phase Transitions in Warped Space: Gravitational Waves and Collider Signatures,

    E. Meg ´ ıas, G. Nardini, and M. Quir´ os, “Cosmological Phase Transitions in Warped Space: Gravitational Waves and Collider Signatures,” JHEP 09 (2018) 095, arXiv:1806.04877 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Continuum dark matter,

    C. Cs´ aki, S. Hong, G. Kurup, S. J. Lee, M. Perelstein, and W. Xue, “Continuum dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 3, (2022) 035025, arXiv:2105.07035 [hep-ph]. – 19 –

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Z-Portal Continuum Dark Matter,

    C. Cs´ aki, S. Hong, G. Kurup, S. J. Lee, M. Perelstein, and W. Xue, “Z-Portal Continuum Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128 no. 8, (2022) 081807, arXiv:2105.14023 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Continuum effective field theories, gravity, and holography,

    S. Fichet, E. Megias, and M. Quiros, “Continuum effective field theories, gravity, and holography,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 9, (2023) 096016, arXiv:2208.12273 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cosmological dark matter from a bulk black hole,

    S. Fichet, E. Megias, and M. Quiros, “Cosmological dark matter from a bulk black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 11, (2023) 115014, arXiv:2212.13268 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    TASI lectures on extra dimensions and branes,

    C. Csaki, “TASI lectures on extra dimensions and branes,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2002): Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model(s), pp. 605–698. 4, 2004. arXiv:hep-ph/0404096

    2002 arXiv

  44. [52]

    a-anomalous interactions of the holographic dilaton,

    C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, A. Ismail, G. Rigo, and F. Sgarlata, “a-anomalous interactions of the holographic dilaton,” Phys. Rev. D106 no. 5, (2022) 055004, arXiv:2205.15324 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant,

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra, and J. Terning, “A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant,” Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2790, arXiv:1305.3919 [hep-th]. – 20 –

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.