Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Imaging of induced surface charge distribution effects in glass vapor cells used for Rydberg atom-based sensors

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Visible coupling lasers create positive surface charge patches on vapor cell walls, distorting Rydberg EIT spectra.

desk verdict A well-evidenced paper identifying visible-light photoemission from alkali-coated glass as a primary stray-field source in two-photon Rydberg EIT; the leading alternative mechanism is not fully excluded but the wavelength data point strongly to the surface effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07018 v1 pith:5OUZHY3R submitted 2025-02-10 physics.atom-ph

Link Patrick , Noah Schlossberger , Daniel F. Hammerland , Nikunjkumar Prajapati , Tate McDonald , Samuel Berweger , Rajavardhan Talashila , Alexandra B. Artusio-Glimpse
show 1 more author
Christopher L. Holloway
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords Rydbergatomselectromagneticallyinducedtransparencysurfacechargevaporcellsstrayelectricfieldsphotoionizationfluorescenceimagingelectrometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Rydberg-atom electrometry relies on electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) in alkali vapor cells, but EIT spectra near the cell walls are distorted by stray electric fields. This paper shows that the coupling laser itself causes those fields: visible light at 480 nm (rubidium) or 511 nm (cesium) photoionizes the alkali-metal layer condensed on the glass, leaving localized positive charge patches where the beam enters and exits the cell. Using a camera-based fluorescence imaging technique, the authors resolve the EIT spectrum along the beam path and map the resulting field, which is about 1 V/m at the wall and decays with distance as a concentrated patch charge would. A three-photon EIT scheme using only near-infrared lasers shows no measurable field induction, and electrode, wavelength-scan, and impedance measurements confirm the charge is positive and its onset follows the cesium work function (~1.9–2.1 eV, i.e., light below ~600 nm). The conclusion is that visible-light photoionization of alkali-exposed glass is a primary disruptor in Rydberg-atom sensors and a key obstacle to vapor cell miniaturization.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is photoelectric emission from the alkali-metal layer that condenses on the interior glass surfaces of a saturated vapor cell: visible photons with energy above the alkali work function leave behind positive metal ions, forming a localized surface charge patch. The readout is fluorescence imaging of EIT: a camera captures the spatial variation of the EIT spectrum along the probe and coupling beams, and the multi-peak structure caused by the differing DC Stark shifts of the magnetic sublevels is fit to a sum of Gaussians (Eq. 2) to extract the local electric field. The paper also uses a finite-element model in which the cell walls are grounded (alkali adsorption makes them conductive) and a uniform charge is placed on a 1 mm disc at the beam entry/exit; the model reproduces the measured field decay. The wavelength dependence of the effect is tied to the cesium work function via a broadband illumination experiment, and the sign of the charge is confirmed with biased electrodes in a vacuum chamber. A three-photon EIT scheme with only near-infrared lasers serves as the control that removes the visible-light interaction.

What would settle it

A decisive experiment would image the EIT spectrum along the beam while illuminating the cell wall with a tunable low-power source swept from 550 nm to 700 nm. The photoionization model predicts localized wall shifts only below the alkali work-function threshold (about 600 nm for cesium); observing wall-induced shifts at longer wavelengths would disprove the mechanism. Alternatively, a Kelvin-probe measurement of the wall surface potential after visible illumination would directly test the sign and location of the charge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the spectral perturbations observed near vapor cell walls in Rydberg EIT experiments are produced by localized positive surface charge patches, generated by the visible coupling beam ionizing the adsorbed alkali layer on the glass. The evidence chain is: fluorescence imaging shows Stark-split EIT features localized at the beam entry/exit points; re-routing the visible beam to different wall positions moves the perturbation; applying bias voltages on electrodes in an alkali-filled vacuum chamber shows the induced field is enhanced or suppressed in the direction expected for positive charge; broadband illumination only perturbs the EIT spectrum for wavelengths shorter than about 600 nm, matching the cesium work function; and the impedance of a cesium vapor cell—unlike bare borosilicate glass—responds to light at the same wavelengths. A three-photon ladder EIT scheme using only 780 nm, 776 nm, and 1259 nm light exhibits no measurable field induction, isolating visible light as the culprit. The paper concludes that direct photoionization of bulk alkali on the cell wall is a primary source of stray fields in Rydberg electrometry, with consequences for cell design and miniaturization.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the spectral distortions are pure DC Stark shifts from surface charges, with no significant contribution from light shifts, optical pumping, or photoionization of background vapor; if any of these were present, the inferred surface charge locations and magnitudes would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two-photon EIT schemes with visible coupling lasers will always produce stray fields at the cell walls, limiting miniaturization to vapor cells with propagation paths of at least about 1 cm.
  • Three-photon EIT using only near-infrared lasers avoids the photoionization-induced charging and is therefore the preferred excitation scheme for compact Rydberg electrometry.
  • Fluorescence imaging of EIT can spatially localize surface charge effects that a single photodetector—whose signal is path-integrated—cannot resolve.
  • The induced charge is positive (alkali ions) and sits at the beam entry/exit points, so field-cancellation strategies must account for a positive patch at those locations.
  • Keeping all incident light above the alkali work-function threshold (for cesium, roughly >600 nm) suppresses the charging effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same photoionization mechanism should apply to rubidium cells at a corresponding threshold (work function around 2.3 eV), so a wavelength-scan experiment on rubidium would test the generality beyond cesium.
  • The fluorescence-imaging diagnostic could be used to screen vapor cell coatings and surface treatments for their susceptibility to visible-light-induced charging.
  • Other compact atom-based sensors that use visible light in alkali cells, such as Rydberg atom clocks or quantum memories, may experience the same wall-charge perturbation; infrared-only excitation could mitigate it.
  • A design rule for future miniaturized cells is to keep visible light from striking the walls, for example by using beam geometries with large clearance or by choosing IR-only excitation schemes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fluorescence-imaging technique for spatially resolving electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) spectra in alkali vapor cells, and uses it to study localized stray electric fields. The authors observe that in a two-photon Rydberg EIT scheme, the 480 nm (Rb) or 511 nm (Cs) coupling light induces localized spectral Stark shifts at the points where the light enters and exits the glass cell walls, and at controlled re-entry points on the side wall. They attribute these shifts to surface charge patches produced by photoionization of the alkali-metal layer condensed on the glass. Supporting experiments include a vacuum-chamber electrode setup showing that the induced surface charge is positive, broadband-wavelength illumination showing a threshold near 600 nm consistent with the Cs work function, impedance measurements on a Cs vapor cell but not on bare glass, and a three-photon NIR-only EIT scheme that shows no measurable field induction unless a 480 nm laser is added. The central conclusion is that visible-light photoionization of alkali-exposed glass is a primary source of stray fields in two-photon Rydberg vapor-cell sensors and a key obstacle to miniaturization.

Significance. If the result holds, it identifies a concrete and previously underappreciated mechanism for stray electric fields in Rydberg atom-based sensors, with a practical mitigation strategy: use NIR-only three-photon EIT schemes or avoid visible light incident on alkali-exposed surfaces. The paper has several strengths: the central claim is supported by multiple independent experiments (spatial imaging, re-entry location control, power dependence, wavelength threshold, impedance measurement, and a three-photon comparison); the fluorescence imaging technique is a new diagnostic for vapor-cell surface physics; and the data are publicly available. The wavelength-threshold and impedance measurements provide falsifiable predictions that distinguish surface photoemission from other mechanisms. The main weakness is that the manuscript does not explicitly rule out an alternative explanation based on volume photoionization of Rydberg atoms by the visible light, although the existing data appear to already provide the necessary controls.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. II D and Sec. II C] The manuscript does not explicitly address the alternative explanation that the observed localized EIT shifts arise from volume photoionization of Rydberg atoms by the 480 nm (or 511 nm) light, rather than from surface charges on the glass. The photon energy at 480 nm (2.58 eV) is far above the ionization threshold of the 50D5/2 Rydberg state (binding energy of order 5 meV), so the visible light can ionize Rydberg atoms throughout the beam-overlap region, creating a space charge that would also produce localized Stark shifts at the beam entry/exit points and at orthogonal re-entry crossings. This is a load-bearing point because the central claim is specifically that the charges reside on the glass surface. The existing data in Sec. II C (Fig. 6) and Sec. II B (Fig. 5) provide the needed controls: the observed wavelength threshold near 600 nm matches the Cs work function, whereas the ionization threshold of these Rydberg states lies in the far infrared, and the vacuum-chamber geometry places the visible beam 3 mm from the Rydberg beam while still observing surface-charge-induced fields. The authors should add an explicit discussion that volume photoionization is excluded by these observations, and should correct the statement in Sec. II D that the 480 nm laser is "off resonant to any atomic transition" (it is resonant to the ionization continuum).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I] The phrase "DC Shark shifts" is a typo and should read "DC Stark shifts."
  2. [Sec. II D] The phrase "off resonant to any atomic transition" is imprecise; the 480 nm light is not resonant with any bound-bound transition, but it is above the ionization continuum of the Rydberg state. Please rephrase to avoid confusion.
  3. [Sec. II A] The finite-element comparison in Fig. 2 uses a model with a 1 mm disc of adjustable surface charge density and disc radius, and the reported E-field magnitudes (order 1 V/m) are therefore model-dependent. The text should state explicitly that these are estimates under the assumed charge geometry, not directly measured values.
  4. [Sec. II A] The text references "Fig. 2(e) and (g)" for the finite-element comparison, while the caption describes panels e-h; please ensure the panel references are consistent with the figure layout.
  5. [Sec. III] The phrase "the dominate source" should be "the dominant source."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is an empirical observation supported by independent control experiments, not a reduction of outputs to inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The E-field extraction (Eqs. 1-2) is a standard Stark-shift inversion: measured spectral splittings are fit with known polarizabilities and empirical weights, which is parameter estimation, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The central claim that visible light induces localized surface charges is tested by controlled re-entry experiments (Fig. 3) where the same visible beam is added or removed at different wall locations, and by the three-photon scheme (Fig. 8) in which no visible light produces no measurable effect and reintroducing 480 nm light produces localized Stark shifts. Independent validations include the broadband wavelength threshold matching the Cs work function (Fig. 6), impedance measurements distinguishing alkali-coated vapor cells from bare glass (Fig. 7), and the electrode-polarity experiment determining positive charge (Fig. 5). The only self-citation, ref. 14 for the fluorescence imaging method, is load-bearing for the measurement technique, but the technique is described and calibrated in the present paper and the conclusion does not reduce to the cited work. The alternative mechanism noted by a skeptical reader (volume photoionization of Rydberg atoms rather than surface charges) is a scientific alternative hypothesis, not a circularity: the paper's inference could be wrong without being circular. Score 1 reflects only the minor self-citation of the imaging method.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central E-field extraction depends on fitting Eq. 2 and the finite-element comparison uses an assumed 1 mm disc and surface charge density. The assumptions are reasonable and mostly stated, but they are not independently measured. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Empirical mJ weights A_mJ = not reported
    In Eq. 2, the relative contributions of mJ sublevels to the EIT line shape are treated as empirical weights fitted to each fluorescence spectrum. The extracted E-field depends on this fit.
  • EIT linewidth sigma = not reported
    The Gaussian width in Eq. 2 is either fitted or assumed; it directly controls the separation of Stark-shifted peaks and therefore the field estimate.
  • Surface charge density on 1 mm disc = not reported
    In the finite-element model of Fig. 2, a uniform surface charge density on an assumed 1 mm disc is adjusted to match the measured E-field decay.
  • Disc radius = 1 mm
    The patch of surface charge is assumed to be a 1 mm disc where the beams enter and exit; the data constrain only the qualitative localization, not the actual distribution.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Rydberg energy levels shift quadratically with weak DC E-fields (Eq. 1), with a full Stark map needed for strong fields.
    Used to convert measured spectral shifts into E-field magnitudes throughout Section II.
  • domain assumption The EIT fluorescence spectrum is well described by a sum of Gaussian lines for each mJ sublevel (Eq. 2).
    This is a modeling assumption used to fit spectra and extract fields; it is not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption Inner walls of the alkali-filled vapor cell can be treated as electrically grounded because adsorbed alkali atoms make the surface conductive.
    Stated in Section II A and based on refs 10 and 16; the finite-element field prediction depends on this boundary condition.
  • domain assumption Bulk cesium has a work function near 1.9 to 2.1 eV, so light below roughly 600 nm photoionizes the condensed Cs layer.
    Used to interpret the broadband wavelength threshold and to attribute charging to photoionization of alkali, not glass.
  • domain assumption The charges left behind are positive ions; the observed electrode-polarity effect confirms this sign.
    Inferred from enhanced and repressed E-field with positive and negative plate voltages in the vacuum chamber experiment (Fig. 5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Imaging of induced surface charge distribution effects in glass vapor cells used for Rydberg atom-based sensors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OUZHY3R

@misc{pith2026250207018,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Imaging of induced surface charge distribution effects in glass vapor cells used for Rydberg atom-based sensors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OUZHY3R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07018}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate the imaging of localized surface electric (E) field effects on the atomic spectrum in a vapor cell used in Rydberg atom-based sensors. These surface E-fields can result from an induced electric charge distribution on the surface. Induced surface charge distributions can dramatically perturb the atomic spectrum, hence degrading the ability to perform electrometry. These effects become pronounced near the walls of the vapor cell, posing challenges for vapor cell miniaturization. Using a fluorescence imaging technique, we investigate the effects of surface charge on the atomic spectrum generated with electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). Our results reveal that visible light (480 nm and 511 nm), i.e., the coupling laser used in two-photon Rydberg EIT schemes, generates localized patches of charge or dipoles where this light interacts with the glass walls of the vapor cell, while a three-photon Rydberg EIT scheme using only near-infrared wavelength lasers shows no measurable field induction. Additionally, imaging in a vacuum chamber where a glass plate is placed between large electrodes confirms that the induced charge is positive. We further validate these findings by studying the photoelectric effect with broadband light during EIT and impedance measurements. These results demonstrate the power of the fluorescence imaging technique to study localized E-field distributions in vapor cells and to target the photoelectric effect of the alkali-exposed glass of vapor cells as a major disruptor in Rydberg atom-based sensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07018 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental setup. A photo-detector is used detect the EIT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Images of spectra for the 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. The vacuum chamber contains 133Cs atoms. Inside the chamber we generate a two-photon ladder 133Cs EIT signal using the 6S1/2 -6P3/2 -42D3/2 excitation path., which requires a 850 nm probe and a 511 nm coupling laser. Once the EIT signal is generated, we can move the glass plate to a position such that the EIT lasers are propagating along the glass sur￾face without touching the glass (3 mm away). We recycled the visi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Re-entry of the visible light to the side wall of the vapor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. EIT measured via photodetector as a function of incident [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (top) Impedance measurement setup with electrodes adhered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electron beam characterization via fluorescence imaging of Rydberg states in atomic vapor

    physics.atom-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rydberg-state fluorescence imaging in rubidium vapor reconstructs a 20 keV electron beam's position, width, and current from its electric field.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Schlossberger , author N

    author author N. Schlossberger , author N. Prajapati , author S. Berweger , author A. P. \ Rotunno , author A. B. \ Artusio-Glimpse , author M. T. \ Simons , author A. A. \ Sheikh , author E. B. \ Norrgard , author S. P. \ Eckel , \ and\ author C. L. \ Holloway ,\ title title Rydberg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as si-traceable field probes and...

    doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00756-7

  2. [2]

    author author J. Kitching ,\ title title Chip-scale atomic devices , \ 10.1063/1.5026238 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 5 ,\ pages 031302 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5026238/14575726/031302\_1\_online.pdf https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5026238/145757...

    doi:10.1063/1.5026238 2018

  3. [3]

    Knappe , author V

    author author S. Knappe , author V. Shah , author P. D. D. \ Schwindt , author L. Hollberg , author J. Kitching , author L.-A. \ Liew , \ and\ author J. Moreland ,\ title title A microfabricated atomic clock , \ 10.1063/1.1787942 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 85 ,\ pages 1460--1462 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip....

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1787942

  4. [4]

    Osterwalder \ and\ author F

    author author A. Osterwalder \ and\ author F. Merkt ,\ title title Using high rydberg states as electric field sensors , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1831 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1831–1834 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1831

  5. [5]

    author author J. A. \ Sedlacek , author A. Schwettmann , author H. Kübler , author R. Löw , author T. Pfau , \ and\ author J. P. \ Shaffer ,\ title en title Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances , \ 10.1038/nphys2423 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 8 ,\ pages 819–824 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphys2423

  6. [6]

    author author M. W. \ Kohlhoff ,\ title en title Interaction of rydberg atoms with surfaces , \ 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60018-x journal journal The European Physical Journal Special Topics \ volume 225 ,\ pages 3061–3085 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1140/epjst/e2016-60018-x

  7. [7]

    Revisiting collisional broadening of $^{85}$Rb Rydberg levels: conclusions for vapor cell manufacture

    author author M. Lei , author S. P. \ Eckel , author E. B. \ Norrgard , author N. Prajapati , author A. B. \ Artusio-Glimpse , author M. T. \ Simons , \ and\ author C. L. \ Holloway ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16669 title Revisiting collisional broadening of ^ 85 rb rydberg levels: conclusions for vapor cell manufacture , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv....

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    author author A. P. \ Rotunno , author C. L. \ Holloway , author N. Prajapati , author S. Berweger , author A. B. \ Artusio-Glimpse , author R. Brown , author M. Simons , author A. K. \ Robinson , author B. N. \ Kayim , author M. A. \ Viray , author J. F. \ Jones , author B. C. \ Sawyer , author R. Wyllie , author T. Walker , author R. W. \ Ziolkowski , a...

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    Ma , author E

    author author L. Ma , author E. Paradis , \ and\ author G. Raithel ,\ title EN title Dc electric fields in electrode-free glass vapor cell by photoillumination , \ 10.1364/OE.380748 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 28 ,\ pages 3676–3685 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. M. \ Obrecht , author R. J. \ Wild , \ and\ author E. A. \ Cornell ,\ title title Measuring electric fields from surface contaminants with neutral atoms , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.062903 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 75 ,\ pages 062903 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Sedlacek , author E

    author author J. Sedlacek , author E. Kim , author S. Rittenhouse , author P. Weck , author H. Sadeghpour , \ and\ author J. Shaffer ,\ title title Electric field cancellation on quartz by rb adsorbate-induced negative electron affinity , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.133201 journ...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author J. D. \ Carter \ and\ author J. D. D. \ Martin ,\ title title Energy shifts of rydberg atoms due to patch fields near metal surfaces , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032902 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 83 ,\ pages 032902 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author R. P. \ Abel , author C. Carr , author U. Krohn , \ and\ author C. S. \ Adams ,\ title en title Electrometry near a dielectric surface using rydberg electromagnetically induced transparency , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.023408 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Schlossberger , author T

    author author N. Schlossberger , author T. McDonald , author K. Su , author R. Talashila , author R. Behary , author C. L. \ Patrick , author D. Hammerland , author E. E. \ Mikhailov , author S. Aubin , author I. Novikova , author C. L. \ Holloway , \ and\ author N. Prajapati ...

    2024

  7. [15]

    author author A. K. \ Mohapatra , author T. R. \ Jackson , \ and\ author C. S. \ Adams ,\ title title Coherent optical detection of highly excited rydberg states using electromagnetically induced transparency , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.113003 journal journal Physical Review Le...

    doi

  8. [16]

    \ Jau \ and\ author T

    author author Y.-Y. \ Jau \ and\ author T. Carter ,\ title title Vapor-cell-based atomic electrometry for detection frequencies below 1 khz , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.054034 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 054034 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author H. Kawano ,\ title title Effective work functions of the elements: Database, most probable value, previously recommended value, polycrystalline thermionic contrast, change at critical temperature, anisotropic dependence sequence, particle size dependence , \ 10.1...

  10. [18]

    Aghili , author S

    author author B. Aghili , author S. Rahbarpour , author M. Berahman , \ and\ author A. Horri ,\ title title Influence of surface roughness on the work function of gold: A density functional theory study , \ 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01068 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemi...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author M. V. \ Nikolić , author S. M. \ Radić , author V. Minić , \ and\ author M. M. \ Ristić ,\ title title The dependence of the work function of rare earth metals on their electron structure , \ 10.1016/0026-2692(95)00097-6 journal journal Microelectronics Journal \...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Bouchiat , author J

    author author M. Bouchiat , author J. Guéna , author P. Jacquier , author M. Lintz , \ and\ author A. Papoyan ,\ title en title Electrical conductivity of glass and sapphire cells exposed to dry cesium vapor , \ 10.1007/s003400050752 journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume ...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author R. L. \ Wells \ and\ author T. Fort ,\ title title Adsorption of water on clean gold by measurement of work function changes , \ 10.1016/0039-6028(72)90182-3 journal journal Surface Science \ volume 32 ,\ pages 554–560 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Lopez , author F

    author author N. Lopez , author F. Illas , \ and\ author G. Pacchioni ,\ title title Adsorption of cu, pd, and cs atoms on regular and defect sites of the sio2 surface , \ 10.1021/ja981753c journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 121 ,\ pages 813–821 ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.