Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Asymmetric Dark Matter in SUSY with approximate $R-$symmetry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a supersymmetric model with an approximate $U(1)_R$ symmetry, a primordial lepton asymmetry can be stored as an $R$-charge asymmetry in the next-to-lightest superpartner, and the gravitino dark matter mass is then predicted to be…

desk verdict A serious, first explicit SUSY ADM model using approximate R-symmetry; the mechanism is plausible, but the 5-10 GeV gravitino mass prediction depends on an unverified thermal washout estimate that a referee should press on. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07932 v1 pith:BF4V6UVF submitted 2025-02-11 hep-ph

Marco Ardu , Daniel Queiroz Correa , Oscar Vives This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.60.Jv95.35.+d98.80.Cq
keywords asymmetricdarkmattersupersymmetryR-symmetrygravitinoleptogenesisnext-to-lightestsupersymmetricparticlebigbangnucleosynthesisDiracgauginos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the observed similarity between the dark matter and baryon energy densities can be explained inside a supersymmetric model, without adding a separate dark sector. Starting from a lepton asymmetry generated at high temperature, it shows that in a model with an approximate $U(1)_R$ symmetry part of that asymmetry is stored as an $R$-charge asymmetry in the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP). That stored asymmetry is later transferred to the gravitino, the lightest supersymmetric particle and the dark matter candidate. Requiring the gravitino relic density to match the measured dark matter density fixes the gravitino mass at roughly $5$–$10$ GeV, while requiring the NLSP to decay before big bang nucleosynthesis pushes the supersymmetric spectrum above about $2$ TeV.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the $R$-charge asymmetry of the NLSP in a model with an approximate $U(1)_R$ symmetry. $R$-charge is a global symmetry under which superpartners carry nonzero charge while Standard Model particles carry zero, so a net $R$-charge stored in the sparticle sector survives as an NLSP asymmetry and is carried into the gravitino when the NLSP decays. The explicit breaking terms $\kappa \hat S_1^3$ and $B_\kappa S_1^3$ do two jobs: at high temperature they mediate $R$-violating processes in equilibrium, connecting the $R$-charge to the primordial lepton asymmetry, and at the SUSY scale their induced Majorana masses are suppressed enough that the asymmetry freezes in. The identity that carries the quantitative argument is $m_{3/2} = 5\,m_p\,\Delta Y_B/\Delta Y_{\rm NLSP}$, which converts the measured baryon asymmetry and the observed dark matter density into a gravitino mass prediction.

What would settle it

Compute the thermal ($T\sim m_{\rm SUSY}$) two- and three-loop contributions to the bino Majorana mass and the higgsino $\mu$-term from the insertions $\kappa$, $\lambda_1$, and $B_\kappa$. If either thermal mass exceeds about $10^{-10}$ times the Dirac gaugino scale, the slepton or sneutrino asymmetry is exponentially suppressed and the predicted $5$–$10$ GeV gravitino mass no longer follows from the baryon asymmetry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the MSSM, a sparticle asymmetry inherited from a high-temperature lepton asymmetry is washed out by annihilations mediated by Majorana gaugino masses and the higgsino $\mu$-term. The paper's central discovery is that imposing a $U(1)_R$ symmetry forbids those washouts, and breaking it only by the superpotential term $\kappa \hat S_1^3$ and the soft term $B_\kappa S_1^3$ gives the needed balance: the $R$-breaking couplings are large enough to keep $R$-violating processes in equilibrium at high temperature, so the $R$-charge is tied to the $B/3-L_\alpha$ asymmetries, yet small enough that the radiatively induced bino Majorana and higgsino masses stay below roughly $10^{-10}$ times the SUSY scale, so the asymmetry freezes out. The NLSP then decays to the gravitino, and matching the gravitino abundance to dark matter yields $m_{3/2} = 5\,m_p\,\Delta Y_B/\Delta Y_{\rm NLSP}$, which predicts gravitino masses of about $5$–$10$ GeV for slepton or sneutrino NLSPs. Big bang nucleosynthesis then forces the NLSP mass above about $2$ TeV.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain stands on a balance between two requirements: the $R$-breaking interactions must be fast enough at early hot times to tie the $R$-charge asymmetry to the lepton asymmetry, and weak enough at the supersymmetry scale that they cannot wash the asymmetry out; the paper estimates the second side with loop factors whose thermal corrections it says are difficult to compute.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is correct, the gravitino is a dark matter particle with a mass near $5$–$10$ GeV whose abundance is set by the baryon asymmetry rather than by thermal freeze-out.
  • The requirement that the NLSP decay before big bang nucleosynthesis forces the NLSP mass above roughly $2$ TeV, pushing the associated superpartner spectrum into the multi-TeV regime.
  • For a stau-like NLSP the predicted gravitino mass is $8.3$ GeV, while for a left-handed slepton or sneutrino NLSP it is $5.3$ GeV; larger gravitino masses would be possible only if the washout factor $\epsilon$ is smaller than one.
  • The resulting multi-TeV spectrum is out of reach of current colliders, but long-lived slepton or sneutrino NLSPs could be searched for at a future $100$ TeV collider.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct finite-temperature calculation of the induced bino Majorana and higgsino masses would go beyond the paper's estimates; if the thermal prefactors erase the loop suppression assumed in Eq. (18), the couplings that keep $R$-violating processes in equilibrium would simultaneously wash out the asymmetry, closing the parameter window.
  • The same transfer mechanism could be adapted to models where $U(1)_R$ is spontaneously broken late, which would tie the dark matter abundance to the $R$-breaking scale and produce a different cosmological signature.
  • The model makes a concrete falsifiable correlation: a long-lived charged NLSP near $2$ TeV discovered at a future collider together with a gravitino in the $5$–$10$ GeV window would confirm the mechanism, whereas a much heavier gravitino would exclude it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a supersymmetric asymmetric dark matter scenario based on an approximate U(1)_R symmetry. A primordial lepton asymmetry is reprocessed by high-temperature R-breaking interactions involving a singlet sector (kappa S1^3 and B_kappa S1^3), generating an R-charge asymmetry that is shared among sparticles. At T below m_SUSY, the authors argue that the washout processes transferring sparticle asymmetries to SM fermions are suppressed because the induced bino Majorana mass and higgsino mass are extremely small. The remaining NLSP asymmetry decays into gravitinos, and matching the gravitino relic density to the observed DM abundance yields m_3/2 ~ 5-10 GeV (Table 2). Requiring NLSP decay before BBN forces the NLSP mass above about 2 TeV. SARAH/SPheno benchmark spectra are presented for stau and sneutrino NLSPs.

Significance. If the mechanism works, the paper achieves a notable result: a supersymmetric framework that connects the baryon and dark matter asymmetries without inventing a separate dark sector, and with a sharp prediction m_3/2 ~ 5-10 GeV plus a lower bound m_NLSP > 2 TeV. The strengths are the explicit model construction, the chemical-equilibrium analysis in Appendix B, the machine-checked SARAH/SPheno spectra, and the careful use of the BBN lifetime constraint. The main weakness is that the central prediction relies on an unquantified finite-temperature suppression of the induced R-breaking masses, so the quantitative result is currently conditional rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Eqs. (18)-(20)] The viability of the mechanism and the quoted gravitino masses depend on the washout processes of Fig. 1 freezing out at T ~ m_SUSY. This is only guaranteed if the thermally induced Majorana bino and higgsino masses remain below ~10^-10 m_SUSY. The text provides T=0 estimates in Eqs. (18)-(19), but the relevant quantity is the finite-temperature self-energy at T ~ m_SUSY. Equation (20) merely assumes that thermal effects have the same spurion structure, and the text states that the thermal prefactors are difficult to estimate. For the benchmark lambda1 = 10^-3, kappa = 10^-6, T = 2 TeV, the combination lambda1 kappa T entering mu(T) is ~2 x 10^-6 GeV, an order of magnitude above the 10^-10 x m_SUSY ~ 2 x 10^-7 GeV threshold quoted in the text, before any O(1) factor. Since the surviving asymmetry is exponentially sensitive to z_b through Eqs. (5)-(7), a moderate upward shift of M_1(T) or mu(T) changes Delta Y_NLSP by orders of magnitude. A quantitative finite-temperature calculation, or a controlled bound from Boltzmann suppression of S1 in the plasma, is needed to support the epsilon = 1 assumption behind Table 2.
  2. [§4.2 and Table 2] The central quantitative predictions m_3/2 = 8.3 GeV and 5.3 GeV are not reproducible from the text. Equation (25) requires the ratio Delta Y_NLSP / Delta Y_B, but neither the combination of the matrix entries in Eq. (52) that gives Delta Y_NLSP nor the numerical value of Delta Y_NLSP / Delta Y_B is provided. The statement that the prediction is independent of the flavour redistribution because both asymmetries are proportional to sum_alpha Y_Delta_alpha is plausible but should be demonstrated; as written, Table 2 is an assertion. Please show the explicit computation, e.g., using Eq. (21) with the coefficients from Appendix B, and give the resulting ratio for each NLSP scenario.
  3. [§4.1 and Appendix B] The high-temperature equilibrium of the R-breaking processes is assumed rather than quantified. The text states that B_kappa S1^3 is 'sufficiently large' and that lambda1 h_u h_d S1 mediates equilibrium processes, leading to mu_S1 = 0 and Eq. (16), but no rate estimate is given. Because this equilibrium is the step that connects the lepton asymmetry to the R-charge asymmetry, the reader cannot judge whether there is a range of B_kappa and lambda1 that is simultaneously large enough for this equilibration and small enough not to spoil the washout freeze-out. A simple comparison of the relevant interaction rates to the Hubble rate at T ~ 10^2-10^3 TeV would make the argument complete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typographical errors that should be corrected, including 'expection', 'willl', 'hiearchy', 'cosmogical hystory', 'condintions', 'appearance', and 'satified'.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The soft-term Lagrangian is typeset with an unmatched parenthesis: the bracket opened in Eq. (9) is closed only in Eq. (10), and the displayed equation is split awkwardly across the two equation numbers.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (20)] The notation for the coupling combination is inconsistent with Eq. (18): Eq. (18) uses lambda1^2 kappa, while Eq. (20) writes lambda1^2 kappa* for M_1(T) and lambda1 kappa for mu(T). Clarifying the spurion charge assignments would help the reader follow the parametric scaling.
  4. [Appendix B, Eq. (52)] The matrix in Eq. (52) lists sparticle asymmetries but does not label the rows in a way that is easy to match to the text's Delta Y values; adding explicit row labels or a caption would improve usability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gravitino-mass prediction follows from an independently computed asymmetry ratio plus the observed DM/baryon density ratio.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The ratio DeltaY_NLSP/DeltaY_B is computed from chemical-equilibrium equations (Appendix B and Eqs. (21)-(24)), and the initial B/3 - L_alpha asymmetries cancel because both the NLSP asymmetry and the baryon asymmetry are linear in the same sums. Equation (25), m3/2 = 5 mp * DeltaY_B/DeltaY_NLSP, then converts the observed Omega_DM/Omega_b ratio into a gravitino mass without feeding any fitted parameter back into the asymmetry ratio. The washout factor epsilon = 1 is an explicit assumption protected by the smallness of the R-breaking couplings, not a quantity fitted to the dark-matter abundance; whether the thermal spurion estimate in Eq. (20) is reliable is a correctness risk, not circularity. The SARAH/SPheno benchmark spectra are independent model checks, and the only self-citation, Ref. [45] for the stau decay-width formula used in Eq. (27), supplies a standard externally checkable result and is not load-bearing. The paper therefore exhibits no step that reduces its prediction to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a window in the R-breaking couplings: large enough to equilibrate R-charge at high temperature, small enough that the induced R-breaking masses do not erase the NLSP asymmetry before it decays to gravitinos. The parameters lambda1, kappa, B_kappa, m_S1 are hand-picked to satisfy this, and the prediction of the gravitino mass is independent of their precise values only if they lie in that window. The added fields are taken from the Dirac gaugino / MRSSM literature and have no independent experimental support.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda1 = 10^-3 (benchmark)
    R-breaking Yukawa coupling lambda1 S1 Hu Hd; chosen small so the induced bino Majorana mass from Eq. (18) is below 10^-10 M_D^B, avoiding washout of the sparticle asymmetry.
  • kappa = 10^-6 (benchmark)
    R-breaking superpotential coupling kappa S1^3; chosen small to suppress R-breaking masses and thermal effects while still allowing equilibration at high T via the B_kappa term.
  • B_kappa = 2 TeV
    Soft R-breaking term B_kappa S1^3; required to be of order the SUSY scale so R-breaking processes are in equilibrium at high temperature, but its value also enters the induced bino mass.
  • m_S1 = ~22 TeV (benchmark)
    Mass of the R-breaking singlet S1; chosen about ten times the NLSP mass to Boltzmann-suppress thermal contributions to R-breaking masses, Eq. (20).
  • m_NLSP = 2.09 TeV (stau) / 2.42 TeV (sneutrino)
    NLSP mass chosen above about 2 TeV so the NLSP decays to the gravitino before Big Bang nucleosynthesis, Eq. (27) and Table 2.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A lepton asymmetry B/3 - L_alpha is generated at high scales by leptogenesis and is initially conserved.
    Section 2 assumes heavy seesaw decays produce the asymmetry; the paper does not model the leptogenesis dynamics.
  • domain assumption At temperatures above the SUSY scale, all relevant interactions are in chemical equilibrium, so particle and sparticle asymmetries are determined by a small set of chemical potentials.
    Section 4.1 and Appendix B solve the chemical equilibrium equations under this ansatz.
  • domain assumption The gravitino is the LSP and stable, and its thermal overproduction is avoided by keeping the reheating temperature below 10^6 GeV.
    Section 2 relies on Ref. [28] for the reheating bound.
  • domain assumption The symmetric component of the NLSP annihilates efficiently, leaving only the asymmetric part to decay into gravitinos.
    Section 4.2; relies on the fact that the symmetric relic is Boltzmann suppressed at m_NLSP above about 1 TeV.
  • ad hoc to paper The induced Majorana bino mass and higgsino mass are below about 10^-10 mSUSY, with thermal contributions sharing the same spurion structure and suppressed by a heavy S1.
    Eqs. (18) to (20) provide estimates; the text acknowledges thermal contributions are difficult to estimate. This is the crux that keeps the asymmetry from being washed out.
  • ad hoc to paper The R-breaking term B_kappa S1^3 is large enough to keep R-violating processes in equilibrium at high temperatures, setting mu_S1 = 0 and linking the R-charge to the lepton asymmetries.
    Section 4.1 and Appendix B; this is required to relate the sparticle asymmetry to the lepton asymmetries.
invented entities (3)
  • Singlet S1 superfield (R=2)
    purpose: Provides explicit R-breaking through kappa S1^3 and B_kappa S1^3, and couples to the Higgses via lambda1 S1 Hu Hd to equilibrate R-charge at high temperature.
    Its lightest states (H6^0, A5) are predicted at about 22 TeV, far beyond current collider reach; no independent evidence is presented.
  • Singlet S2 superfield (R=0)
    purpose: Gives a Dirac mass to the S1 fermion via mu_S2 S1 S2 and contributes to the bino Dirac mass.
    No independent signal; heavy and unobserved.
  • Dirac gaugino sector (S, T, O, R_u, R_d)
    purpose: Standard R-symmetric model fields that give Dirac masses to bino, wino, gluino and Higgsinos, replacing Majorana masses to avoid washout of the sparticle asymmetry.
    Borrowed from the Dirac gaugino literature; masses are multi-TeV and unobserved. They are instrumental in avoiding the asymmetry-removing Majorana masses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymmetric Dark Matter in SUSY with approximate $R-$symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BF4V6UVF

@misc{pith2026250207932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymmetric Dark Matter in SUSY with approximate $R-$symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BF4V6UVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07932}
}
abstract

We implement the asymmetric dark matter framework, linking the ordinary and dark matter abundances, within a supersymmetric context. We consider a supersymmetric model that respects an approximate $U(1)_R$ symmetry, which is broken in such a way that at high temperature the $R$ breaking sector mediate processes in equilibrium, but at the SUSY mass scale, the sparticles asymmetry is frozen. In this framework, the gravitino serves as the dark matter candidate, and its mass is predicted to be $\sim10$ GeV to match the observed relic abundance. We identify several realistic spectra; however, the requirement for the Next-to-Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (NLSP) to decay into the gravitino before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constrains the viable spectrum to masses above 2 TeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07932 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. bino and Higgsino mediated processes that can remove the sparticles asymmetry. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Three loop contribution to the bino Majorana mass and two-loop contribution to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Asymmetric Origin for Gravitino Relic Density in the Hybrid Gravity-Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking

    Z. Kang and T. Li,Asymmetric Origin for Gravitino Relic Density in the Hybrid Gravity-Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking, JHEP 10 (2012) 150, [arXiv:1111.7313]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv

    F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933) 110–127

    1933

  3. [2]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379–403

    1970

  4. [3]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]

    arXiv 2005

  5. [4]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195–373, [hep-ph/9506380]

    arXiv 1996

  6. [5]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan,Dark Matter, arXiv:2406.01705

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    M. B. Gavela, P. Hernandez, J. Orloff, and O. Pene,Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 (1994) 795–810, [hep-ph/9312215]

    arXiv 1994

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    Huet and E

    P. Huet and E. Sather,Electroweak baryogenesis and standard model CP violation, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 379–394, [hep-ph/9404302]

    1995 arXiv

  2. [9]

    D. B. Kaplan,A Single explanation for both the baryon and dark matter densities, Phys. Rev. Lett.68 (1992) 741–743

    1992

  3. [10]

    Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?, Phys

    S. Nussinov,TECHNOCOSMOLOGY: COULD A TECHNIBARYON EXCESS PROVIDE A ’NATURAL’ MISSING MASS CANDIDATE?, Phys. Lett. B165 (1985) 55–58

    1985

  4. [11]

    Nardi, F

    E. Nardi, F. Sannino, and A. Strumia,Decaying Dark Matter can explain the e+- excesses, JCAP 01 (2009) 043, [arXiv:0811.4153]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [12]

    D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek,Asymmetric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 115016, [arXiv:0901.4117]. 21

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Petraki and R

    K. Petraki and R. R. Volkas,Review of asymmetric dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330028, [arXiv:1305.4939]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [14]

    K. M. Zurek,Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures, and Constraints, Phys. Rept. 537 (2014) 91–121, [arXiv:1308.0338]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Shelton and K

    J. Shelton and K. M. Zurek,Darkogenesis: A baryon asymmetry from the dark matter sector, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 123512, [arXiv:1008.1997]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Haba and S

    N. Haba and S. Matsumoto,Baryogenesis from Dark Sector, Prog. Theor. Phys.125 (2011) 1311–1316, [arXiv:1008.2487]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [17]

    M. T. Frandsen, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Light asymmetric dark matter from new strong dynamics, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 051703, [arXiv:1103.4350]

    2011 arXiv

  11. [18]

    H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane,The Search for Supersymmetry: Probing Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 117 (1985) 75–263

    1985

  12. [19]

    H. P. Nilles,Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics, Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1–162

    1984

  13. [20]

    D. J. H. Chung, L. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, S. F. King, J. D. Lykken, and L.-T. Wang, The Soft supersymmetry breaking Lagrangian: Theory and applications, Phys. Rept. 407 (2005) 1–203, [hep-ph/0312378]

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    D’Eramo, L

    F. D’Eramo, L. Fei, and J. Thaler,Dark Matter Assimilation into the Baryon Asymmetry, JCAP 03 (2012) 010, [arXiv:1111.5615]

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Davidson, E

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir,Leptogenesis, Phys. Rept. 466 (2008) 105–177, [arXiv:0802.2962]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B249 (1985) 361–380

    1985

  17. [25]

    Pilaftsis,CP violation and baryogenesis due to heavy Majorana neutrinos, Phys

    A. Pilaftsis,CP violation and baryogenesis due to heavy Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5431–5451, [hep-ph/9707235]

    1997 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hambye, E

    T. Hambye, E. Ma, and U. Sarkar,Leptogenesis from neutralino decay with nonholomorphic R-parity violation, Nucl. Phys. B590 (2000) 429–452, [hep-ph/0006173]

    2000 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hambye,Leptogenesis at the TeV scale, Nucl

    T. Hambye,Leptogenesis at the TeV scale, Nucl. Phys. B633 (2002) 171–192, [hep-ph/0111089]

    2002 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe, other thesis, 3, 1995

    T. Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe, other thesis, 3, 1995

    1995

  21. [29]

    S. Y. Khlebnikov and M. E. Shaposhnikov,The Statistical Theory of Anomalous Fermion Number Nonconservation, Nucl. Phys. B308 (1988) 885–912

    1988

  22. [30]

    J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner,Cosmological baryon and lepton number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 3344–3349

    1990

  23. [31]

    Asaka, K

    T. Asaka, K. Hamaguchi, and K. Suzuki,Cosmological gravitino problem in gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking models, Phys. Lett. B490 (2000) 136–146, [hep-ph/0005136]

    2000 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Fayet,Supergauge Invariant Extension of the Higgs Mechanism and a Model for the electron and Its Neutrino, Nucl

    P. Fayet,Supergauge Invariant Extension of the Higgs Mechanism and a Model for the electron and Its Neutrino, Nucl. Phys. B90 (1975) 104–124

    1975

  25. [33]

    L. J. Hall and L. Randall,U(1)-R symmetric supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B352 (1991) 289–308

    1991

  26. [34]

    Randall and N

    L. Randall and N. Rius,The Minimal U(1)-R symmetric model revisited, Phys. Lett. B 286 (1992) 299–306. 22

    1992

  27. [35]

    A. E. Nelson, N. Rius, V. Sanz, and M. Unsal,The Minimal supersymmetric model without a mu term, JHEP 08 (2002) 039, [hep-ph/0206102]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P. J. Fox, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner,Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 08 (2002) 035, [hep-ph/0206096]

    2002 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Abel and D

    S. Abel and D. Busbridge,Mapping Dirac gaugino masses, JHEP 11 (2013) 098, [arXiv:1306.6323]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dießner, J

    P. Dießner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, and D. Stöckinger,Higgs boson mass and electroweak observables in the MRSSM, JHEP 12 (2014) 124, [arXiv:1410.4791]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Abel and M

    S. Abel and M. Goodsell,Easy dirac gauginos, Journal of High Energy Physics2011 (2011), no. 6 1–33

    2011

  32. [40]

    Benakli,Dirac gauginos: a user manual, Fortschritte der Physik59 (2011), no

    K. Benakli,Dirac gauginos: a user manual, Fortschritte der Physik59 (2011), no. 11-12 1079–1082

    2011

  33. [41]

    Benakli, M

    K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell, and F. Staub,Dirac gauginos and the 125 gev higgs, Journal of High Energy Physics2013 (2013), no. 6 1–34

    2013

  34. [42]

    Benakli,A framework for unified dirac gauginos, inEPJ Web of Conferences, vol

    K. Benakli,A framework for unified dirac gauginos, inEPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 164, p. 01001, EDP Sciences, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Hisano, S

    J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M. Nagai, O. Saito, and M. Senami,Non-perturbative effect on thermal relic abundance of dark matter, Phys. Lett. B646 (2007) 34–38, [hep-ph/0610249]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    J. L. Feng, S.-f. Su, and F. Takayama,SuperWIMP gravitino dark matter from slepton and sneutrino decays, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 063514, [hep-ph/0404198]

    2004 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Boubekeur, K

    L. Boubekeur, K. Y. Choi, R. Ruiz de Austri, and O. Vives,The degenerate gravitino scenario, JCAP 04 (2010) 005, [arXiv:1002.0340]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi,Hadronic decay of late - decaying particles and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis, Phys. Lett. B625 (2005) 7–12, [astro-ph/0402490]

    2005 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Porod,Spheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, susy particle decays and susy particle production at e+ e- colliders, Computer Physics Communications 153 (2003), no

    W. Porod,Spheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, susy particle decays and susy particle production at e+ e- colliders, Computer Physics Communications 153 (2003), no. 2 275–315

    2003

  40. [48]

    Porod and F

    W. Porod and F. Staub,Spheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, cp-phases and models beyond the mssm, Computer Physics Communications183 (Nov., 2012) 2458–2469

    2012

  41. [49]

    D. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and R.-j. Zhang,Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B491 (1997) 3–67, [hep-ph/9606211]

    1997 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Degrassi, P

    G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner,On the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM for arbitrary stop mixing, Nucl. Phys. B611 (2001) 403–422, [hep-ph/0105096]

    2001 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Brignole, G

    A. Brignole, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner,On the O(alpha(t)**2) two loop corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B631 (2002) 195–218, [hep-ph/0112177]

    2002 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Brignole, G

    A. Brignole, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and F. Zwirner,On the two loop sbottom corrections to the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B643 (2002) 79–92, [hep-ph/0206101]

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Dedes and P

    A. Dedes and P. Slavich,Two loop corrections to radiative electroweak symmetry breaking in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B657 (2003) 333–354, [hep-ph/0212132]

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Dedes, G

    A. Dedes, G. Degrassi, and P. Slavich,On the two loop Yukawa corrections to the MSSM Higgs boson masses at large tan beta, Nucl. Phys. B672 (2003) 144–162, [hep-ph/0305127]

    2003 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Staub,Sarah, 2012

    F. Staub,Sarah, 2012. 23

    2012

  48. [56]

    Staub,Sarah 4: A tool for (not only susy) model builders, Computer Physics Communications 185 (June, 2014) 1773–1790

    F. Staub,Sarah 4: A tool for (not only susy) model builders, Computer Physics Communications 185 (June, 2014) 1773–1790

    2014

  49. [57]

    M. D. Goodsell and A. Joury,Active learning bsm parameter spaces, The European Physical Journal C83 (2023), no. 4 268

    2023

  50. [58]

    Kotlarski,Analysis of the r-symmetric supersymmetric models including quantum corrections, 2016

    W. Kotlarski,Analysis of the r-symmetric supersymmetric models including quantum corrections, 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    H. P. Nilles, M. Srednicki, and D. Wyler,Weak Interaction Breakdown Induced by Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 346

    1983

  52. [60]

    Alvarez-Gaume, J

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, J. Polchinski, and M. B. Wise,Minimal Low-Energy Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B221 (1983) 495

    1983

  53. [61]

    Claudson, L

    M. Claudson, L. J. Hall, and I. Hinchliffe,Low-Energy Supergravity: False Vacua and Vacuous Predictions, Nucl. Phys. B228 (1983) 501–528

    1983

  54. [62]

    J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, and M. Sher,Charge / Color Breaking Minima and a-Parameter Bounds in Supersymmetric Models, Nucl. Phys. B306 (1988) 1–13

    1988

  55. [63]

    J. A. Casas, A. Lleyda, and C. Munoz,Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys. B471 (1996) 3–58, [hep-ph/9507294]

    1996 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O’Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, Constraining the Natural MSSM through tunneling to color-breaking vacua at zero and non-zero temperature, Phys. Lett. B737 (2014) 156–161, [arXiv:1405.7376]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. Collaboration et al.,Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb−1 of √s = 13 tev pp collision data with the atlas detector, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.02332(2017)

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Chalons, M

    G. Chalons, M. D. Goodsell, S. Kraml, H. Reyes-González, and S. L. Williamson,Lhc limits on gluinos and squarks in the minimal dirac gaugino model, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2019), no. 4 1–28

    2019

  59. [67]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, and A. J. Powell,Dirac vs Majorana gauginos at a 100 TeV collider, JHEP 08 (2016) 014, [arXiv:1606.07090]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    M. D. Goodsell, S. Kraml, H. Reyes-González, and S. L. Williamson,Constraining Electroweakinos in the Minimal Dirac Gaugino Model, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020), no. 4 047, [arXiv:2007.08498]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    L. M. Carpenter and M. J. Smylie,Exploring the phenomenology of weak adjoint scalars in minimal R-symmetric models, JHEP 02 (2022) 102, [arXiv:2108.02795]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    J. L. Feng, S. Iwamoto, Y. Shadmi, and S. Tarem,Long-Lived Sleptons at the LHC and a 100 TeV Proton Collider, JHEP 12 (2015) 166, [arXiv:1505.02996]

    2015 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022, [arXiv:1712.02118]

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022, [arXiv:1712.02118]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Aad et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022), no. 7 606, [arXiv:2201.02472]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for disappearing tracks as a signature of new long-lived particles in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 08 (2018) 016, [arXiv:1804.07321]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B806 (2020) 135502, [arXiv:2004.05153]. 24

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M. D. Goodsell and L. Priya,Long dead winos, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022), no. 3 235, [arXiv:2106.08815]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Acharya et al.,The Physics Programme Of The MoEDAL Experiment At The LHC, Int

    MoEDAL Collaboration, B. Acharya et al.,The Physics Programme Of The MoEDAL Experiment At The LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29 (2014) 1430050, [arXiv:1405.7662]

    2014 arXiv

  69. [77]

    J. L. Pinfold,The MoEDAL experiment: a new light on the high-energy frontier, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A377 (2019), no. 2161 20190382

    2019

  70. [78]

    Aielli et al.,Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector, Eur

    G. Aielli et al.,Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 12 1177, [arXiv:1911.00481]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Curtin et al.,Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, Rept

    D. Curtin et al.,Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, Rept. Prog. Phys.82 (2019), no. 11 116201, [arXiv:1806.07396]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Bertolini, F

    S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, and A. Masiero,New Constraints on Squark and Gluino Masses from Radiative b Decays, Phys. Lett. B192 (1987) 437–440

    1987

  73. [81]

    Moroi,The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys

    T. Moroi,The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 6565–6575, [hep-ph/9512396]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 56, 4424 (1997)]

    1996 arXiv

  74. [82]

    S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells,Muon Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment in Supersymmetric Theories, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 035003, [hep-ph/0103067]

    2001 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Bartl, T

    A. Bartl, T. Gajdosik, E. Lunghi, A. Masiero, W. Porod, H. Stremnitzer, and O. Vives, General flavor blind MSSM and CP violation, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 076009, [hep-ph/0103324]

    2001 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Diessner, J

    P. Diessner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, and D. Stöckinger,Two-loop correction to the Higgs boson mass in the MRSSM, Adv. High Energy Phys.2015 (2015) 760729, [arXiv:1504.05386]. 25

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.