Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Models with rank-reducing discrete boundary conditions on $T^2/{\mathbb Z}_4$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Minimal $SU(6)$ model breaks electroweak symmetry with one tiny twist.

desk verdict A careful new SU(6) gauge-Higgs model where the EWSB vacuum is shown only along the flat Wilson-line directions; the tadpole argument is the cleanest result. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08250 v3 pith:2GMH3WPN submitted 2025-02-12 hep-ph hep-th

Yoshiharu Kawamura , Eiji Kodaira , Kentaro Kojima , Toshifumi Yamashita This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords gauge-HiggsunificationT^2/Z_4orbifoldrank-reducingboundaryconditionsHosotanimechanismtwoHiggsdoubletmodelSU(6)Wilsonlinephasesone-loopeffectivepotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a class of discrete boundary conditions on the six-dimensional orbifold $T^2/\mathbb{Z}_4$—ones that irreducibly reduce the rank of the gauge group, previously thought not to do so—can serve as a working basis for electroweak model building. The authors construct a minimal $SU(6)$ gauge-Higgs unification model whose four-dimensional effective theory has the electroweak symmetry $SU(2)_D \times U(1)_y$, two Higgs doublets arising as zero modes of the extra-dimensional gauge field, and one generation of quarks unified in a single $\mathbf{15}$-dimensional multiplet without exotic states. They compute the one-loop effective potential for the continuous Wilson line phases and exhibit bulk matter content for which the global minimum sits slightly away from the electroweak-symmetric point, so the Hosotani mechanism breaks the electroweak symmetry by a small amount and sets the compactification scale near a few TeV. If the construction holds together, it offers a higher-dimensional origin for the Higgs sector in which the Higgs mass parameters are protected from quadratic divergences even in the presence of fixed-point tadpole terms.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the twist matrices $(R_0, T_1)$ encoding the boundary conditions on $T^2/\mathbb{Z}_4$, which can contain a non-diagonal $2\times2$ block $t'_1$ that no gauge transformation can diagonalize; such a block forces an irreducible reduction of the gauge group rank, and that rank reduction is what produces the electroweak models. In the $SU(6)$ model the same twist matrices leave a $4\times4$ block supporting the continuous Wilson line phases $(a,b)$, whose dynamics are governed by the one-loop effective potential $V^{[\beta_T]}(q_1,q_2)$ of eq. (5.4), a sum over Kaluza-Klein quartets obtained by Poisson resummation; minimizing this potential through the Hosotani mechanism selects the slightly broken vacuum.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop effective potential for the nonflat neutral Higgs mode $h_- = (h_u - h_d)/\sqrt{2}$ together with the flat Wilson line phases $(a,b)$, including bulk mass terms and bulk-brane mixing. If the global minimum moves far from $(a,b) = (0.0294, 1/2)$ or acquires a non-negligible $h_-$ vacuum expectation value, the claimed slightly broken electroweak vacuum is not the true vacuum of the toy model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the boundary conditions of eq. (3.13)—built from twist matrices whose non-diagonal $2\times2$ block forces a rank reduction that no gauge transformation can undo—turn the minimal $SU(6)$ theory on $T^2/\mathbb{Z}_4$ into a gauge-Higgs unification model of the electroweak interactions. The zero-mode spectrum is derived explicitly: the extra-dimensional gauge field $A_z$ supplies two Higgs doublets $H_u$ and $H_d$; a bulk fermion in the $\mathbf{15}$ of $SU(6)$ yields the quarks of one generation without exotic states; and the residual four-dimensional symmetry is $SU(2)_D \times U(1)_y$, identified with the electroweak symmetry. The dynamical step is the one-loop effective potential for the continuous Wilson line phases, whose global minimum for the chosen bulk fermion content lies at $(a,b) = (0.0294, 1/2)$, slightly displaced from the electroweak-symmetric point $(0, 1/2)$; the displacement gives the $W$ boson its mass through the Hosotani mechanism and implies a compactification scale $1/R \simeq m_W/0.0294$, of order a few TeV. They also show that a modified reflection symmetry of the orbifold forbids the hermitian fixed-point tadpole terms of the field strength, so quadratic divergences do not re-enter the Higgs masses at any loop order.

Load-bearing premise

The one-loop effective potential is evaluated only along the flat Wilson line directions $(a,b)$, with no bulk mass terms, no bulk-brane mixing, and no vacuum expectation values for the nonflat scalar zero modes; if those omitted directions shift the minimum significantly, the claimed small electroweak breaking and the few-TeV compactification scale would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $SU(6)$ model realizes two standard-model Higgs doublets as zero modes of the extra-dimensional gauge field, so the Higgs quartic and mass terms come from gauge and matter dynamics rather than from an elementary scalar sector.
  • Quarks of one generation fit into a single $\mathbf{15}$ of $SU(6)$ as zero modes, with no exotic quarks, so the model needs only one bulk multiplet per generation.
  • The Hosotani mechanism produces a slightly broken electroweak vacuum with compactification scale $1/R \simeq m_W/0.0294 \sim$ a few TeV, bringing the Kaluza-Klein spectrum within reach of future colliders in principle.
  • The Weinberg angle implied at the compactification scale is $\sin\theta_W \simeq \sqrt{3}/2 \simeq 0.87$, so reproducing the observed value requires boundary operators, renormalization-group running, or mixing with an additional $U(1)$.
  • Fixed-point tadpole terms of the field strength do not reintroduce quadratic divergences into the Higgs masses, at one-loop or higher orders: the modified reflection symmetry forbids the hermitian tadpole operators, and the surviving antihermitian operator has no direct coupling to the Higgs zero modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The claimed minimum at $(a,b) = (0.0294, 1/2)$ is best read as an existence proof: the potential is computed only along the flat Wilson-line directions, and including the nonflat mode $h_-$, bulk masses, or bulk-brane mixing could move or destabilize the vacuum and with it the few-TeV compactification estimate.
  • The same non-diagonal twist blocks could be transplanted to the $SU(9)$ extension sketched in the paper to unify color with the electroweak sector, or combined with orbifold family unification to seek three-generation spectra from non-diagonal boundary conditions—directions the authors flag for future work.
  • The reflection-symmetry argument suggests a searchable criterion for other 6D models: if the twist matrix $R_0$ admits a modified reflection $P_6$ with $R_0 = P_6 R_0^\dagger P_6$, the hermitian tadpole operators are forbidden while antihermitian ones may survive without feeding the Higgs masses; scanning other $\mathbb{Z}_N$ orbifolds for such matrices could yield more models with the same protec
  • Realistic quark masses will likely require brane-localized fermions with bulk-brane mixing, as the paper notes; the mixing strength would then replace the toy-model potential as the physical determinant of the electroweak scale, shifting the model's predictive content into effective-theory parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies six-dimensional SU(n) gauge theories on T^2/Z4 with rank-reducing discrete boundary conditions, both without and with continuous Wilson line phases. It first reviews the classification of twist matrices and constructs product-group unification models (SU(7), SU(8)) with no light Wilson-line degrees. It then proposes an SU(6) model whose boundary conditions reduce SU(6) to SU(2)_D × U(1)_y at the point (a,b)=(0,1/2), with two Higgs doublets arising from zero modes of Az and one generation of quarks unified in the 15 of SU(6). The bulk of the paper derives the one-loop effective potential for the continuous Wilson line phases from the KK spectrum of quartets (Eq. (5.4), App. B), lists the contributions of several SU(6) representations, and gives numerical examples in which the potential has a global minimum slightly away from the EW-symmetric point, e.g., (a,b)=(0.0294,1/2), implying a compactification scale of a few TeV. The final sections reinterpret the result in a two-Higgs-doublet language and argue that modified reflection symmetry forbids the dangerous tadpole contributions to Higgs masses.

Significance. The paper contains a careful and useful construction: the KK decomposition of quartets in App. A and the derivation of Eq. (5.4) are clear, the representation sums in Eqs. (5.22)–(5.28) are explicit, and the numerical minimization can be reproduced from the given formulas. The observation that rank-reducing discrete BCs on T^2/Z4 allow a genuinely new class of models, and that an SU(6) example yields two Higgs doublets plus a 15 of quarks without exotics, is genuinely interesting. The tadpole analysis with modified reflection is also a nice point. However, the headline EWSB result is established only for a truncated potential: the minimization is performed on the flat Wilson-line directions only, without bulk masses, bulk-boundary mixing, or the nonflat scalar zero modes, and the authors themselves state in Section 8 that these omissions may be important precisely in the small-deviation regime. The paper is therefore a valuable model-building starting point rather than a demonstrated proof of a slightly broken EW vacuum.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2 and §8] The central EWSB claim is established only along the flat directions. After Eq. (5.28) the authors state that 'the effective potential is calculated only for the flat directions' and that mass terms are not included; the numerical minimum at (a,b)=(0.0294,1/2) in §5.2 is obtained from this truncated potential. Section 6 shows that the nonflat neutral direction h_- is a physical degree of freedom and can acquire a VEV, and §8 concedes that 'the other modes may not be negligible' precisely because the deviation from the EW-symmetric vacuum is small. Hence the configuration has not been shown to be a stationary point of the full scalar potential, and the inferred compactification scale of a few TeV is conditional. Please either compute the one-loop potential including h_- (e.g., along the lines of Ref. [54]) or restrict the existence claim explicitly to the Wilson-line subspace.
  2. [§7 and Abstract] The stronger finiteness claim in the abstract—that quadratic divergences are not reintroduced into the Higgs masses 'not only at one-loop level but also at higher orders'—is not fully supported. The modified reflection P6 in Eq. (7.2) forbids the hermitian tadpole terms Tr((R0)^k F_{z\bar z}) for U(1)_y and U(1)_A, but the last paragraph of §7 states that the allowed U(1)_III tadpole term creates a nontrivial background A^III_z that changes the KK decompositions, and the authors say these effects were neglected for simplicity. Because KK decompositions determine the scalar mass matrix, this background can affect Higgs masses even without a direct tadpole contribution. The caveat should be reflected in the abstract, or the background effects should be analyzed.
  3. [§4 and §5.2] The quantitative EWSB is obtained in a toy model whose matter content is chosen by hand: an adjoint chiral fermion plus two Dirac fermions in the 6 and 15, with the authors noting that the model does not reproduce the top Yukawa coupling and requires 'additional mechanisms to cancel the bulk anomaly.' The abstract's phrase 'a minimal model can describe the breakdown of the electroweak symmetry' therefore conflates the model-building construction with the toy-model dynamics. Please state in the abstract that the demonstrated minimum exists in a restricted toy-model potential, not in the full SU(6) model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.8)] The parameters a and b are introduced via α_j=(a-ib)/2, and the authors note that a (b) does not correspond directly to ⟨A5⟩ (⟨A6⟩) because Y is not hermitian. A one-sentence relation between a,b and the eigenphases of W1 in Eq. (3.11) would make the parameterization less opaque.
  2. [§5.2] The numerical results use the cutoff wcut=100 but no sensitivity study is reported; please state that the positions of the minima are stable when wcut is increased.
  3. [Table 1] The representation labels 56, 70, 20 and the notation for U(1) charges are not defined in the caption; please add cross-references to Eqs. (5.9)–(5.11) and to the charge convention in Section 4.
  4. [§6] The mass-eigenstate analysis assumes the lightest mode is massless and neglects quartic terms except for the lightest mode; the range of v over which this approximation is controlled should be stated.
  5. [§4] The prediction sin θ_W = √3/2 at the compactification scale is striking; the sentence on boundary operators would benefit from an estimate of the coefficient sizes needed to bring the weak mixing angle to its observed low-energy value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the one-loop EWSB minimum is a computed output, not a fitted input; the main limitation is the omission of the nonflat h- direction, which the authors explicitly acknowledge.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim is the one-loop effective potential for the continuous Wilson line phases, minimized at (a,b) = (0.0294, 1/2) in the toy model. That potential is derived from the KK masses of the Z4 quartets via zeta-function regularization and Poisson resummation (Appendix B), with no parameter fitted to a target value. The matter content of the toy model is a discrete model-building choice, not a continuous fit; the position of the minimum is a calculated output, and the authors explicitly say 'the position of the minimum should not be taken seriously.' The two Higgs doublets are zero modes of the gauge field by construction from the chosen boundary conditions, but the paper presents this as a structural feature of the model, not as a prediction derived from independent inputs. The main input from prior work is the classification of non-diagonal twist matrices in ref. [33] by the same authors; however, this is an externally published classification and the paper notes that independent authors completed the classification using trace conservation laws in refs. [34,35], so the self-citation is not an unverified load-bearing chain. The paper's most serious weakness is not circularity: the effective potential is minimized only along the flat directions, with bulk masses and bulk-boundary mixing omitted, and the nonflat scalar mode h- is not included. The authors concede this in Section 5.1 ('the effective potential is calculated only for the flat directions') and in the Conclusions ('the other modes may not be negligible, and they should be taken care of appropriately'). That is an incompleteness or correctness risk, not a reduction of the derivation to its own inputs. No step was found where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction or where a claimed result is equivalent by definition to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on the global U(n) symmetry framing from prior work, on the flat-direction truncation of the effective potential, and on a specifically engineered reflection symmetry. The only hand-chosen input is the bulk fermion content, which is varied to produce a small EWSB minimum. No new particles or forces are invented.

free parameters (1)
  • Bulk fermion content of the toy model = 1 adjoint chiral fermion + 1 Dirac fermion in 6 + 1 Dirac fermion in 15, all with eta_T = +1
    Chosen by hand to make the one-loop effective potential have a global minimum near (0,1/2); the position of the minimum is not a prediction of the gauge structure alone.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Lagrangian has a global G' = U(n) symmetry, so twist matrices may be U(n) elements even when the gauge group is SU(n).
    Used throughout sections 2 and 3; in particular the SU(6) BC T1 is a U(6) element (eq. (3.7)).
  • domain assumption The tree-level potential is minimized when the VEV magnitudes |alpha_j| are equal (flat directions), and only these directions are examined for the vacuum.
    Section 3.2: 'the tree level potential which is proportional to Tr[Az, A_bar_z]^2 is minimized (vanishing) when the magnitudes |alpha_j| are also independent of j.' This restricts the effective potential to flat directions.
  • ad hoc to paper The one-loop effective potential without mass terms, evaluated only for continuous Wilson line phases, determines the vacuum even when nonflat modes are present.
    Section 5 and Conclusions: mass terms and nonflat zero modes are neglected, and effects of tadpole-induced backgrounds on KK decompositions are not included. The paper calls it a proof of existence.
  • ad hoc to paper The modified reflection P6 with R0 = P6 R0^dagger P6 forbids the hermitian tadpole terms Tr((R0)^k F_z_bar_z).
    Section 7, eq. (7.2). The reflection is introduced specifically to forbid tadpole contributions; the antihermitian part remains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Models with rank-reducing discrete boundary conditions on $T^2/{\mathbb Z}_4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2GMH3WPN

@misc{pith2026250208250,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Models with rank-reducing discrete boundary conditions on $T^2/\mathbb Z_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2GMH3WPN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08250}
}
abstract

We study six-dimensional $SU(n)$ gauge models with rank-reducing discrete boundary conditions on the orbifold $T^2/{\mathbb Z}_4$, without and with continuous Wilson line phases. For the latter case, we find that a minimal model can describe the breakdown of the electroweak symmetry based on an $SU(6)$ gauge group. This model possesses excellent features that two Higgs doublets come from the zero modes of the extra-dimensional gauge field, and the quarks in each generation can be unified into one multiplet, without exotic quarks, as the zero modes of a bulk field in the $\boldsymbol{15}$ representation of $SU(6)$. There exists a vacuum where the electroweak symmetry is slightly broken by the Hosotani mechanism, with the addition of suitable bulk fields. %adding suitable bulk fields, and Interestingly, quadratic divergences are not reintroduced into the Higgs masses from the tadpole terms of the field strength localized on fixed points, not only at one-loop level but also at higher orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08250 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In the upper row, the figures depict the contributions from a bosonic d.o.f. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. In the upper row, the figures depict the contributions from a bosonic d.o.f. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The effective potential in the toy model is depicted. From the light orange region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Multi-Higgs Mass Spectrum in Gauge-Higgs Unification

    K. Kojima, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, Multi-Higgs Mass Spectrum in Gauge-Higgs Unification, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 075004 [arXiv:0801.2803 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  2. [1]

    Manton, A new six-dimensional approach to the Weinberg-Salam model , Nucl

    N. Manton, A new six-dimensional approach to the Weinberg-Salam model , Nucl. Phys. B 158 (1979) 141

    work page 1979

  3. [2]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces , Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438

    work page 1974

  4. [3]

    Dimopoulos and H

    S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5) , Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 150

    work page 1981

  5. [4]

    Sakai, Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS , Z

    N. Sakai, Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS , Z. Phys. C 11 (1981) 153

    work page 1981

  6. [5]

    Kawamura, Gauge Symmetry Reduction from the Extra Space S1/Z2, Prog

    Y. Kawamura, Gauge Symmetry Reduction from the Extra Space S1/Z2, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000) 613 [hep-ph/9902423]

    arXiv 2000

  7. [6]

    Kawamura, Triplet-doublet Splitting, Proton Stability and an Extra Dimension , Prog

    Y. Kawamura, Triplet-doublet Splitting, Proton Stability and an Extra Dimension , Prog. Theor. Phys. 105 (2001) 999 [hep-ph/0012125]

    arXiv 2001

  8. [7]

    Hall and Y

    L. Hall and Y. Nomura, Gauge Unification in Higher Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 055003 [hep-ph/0103125]

    arXiv 2001

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    N. V. Krasnikov, Ultraviolet Fixed Point Behavior Of The Five-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory, The Gauge Hierarchy Problem And A Possible New Dimension At The Tev Scale, Phys. Lett. B 273 (1991) 246

    1991

  2. [9]

    Hatanaka, T

    H. Hatanaka, T. Inami and C. S. Lim, The gauge hierarchy problem and higher dimen- sional gauge theories , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13 (1998) 2601 [hep-th/9805067]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Arkani-Hamed, A

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]. 31

    2001 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Maru and T

    N. Maru and T. Yamashita, Two-loop calculation of Higgs mass in gauge-Higgs uni- fication: 5D massless QED compactified on S1, Nucl. Phys. B 754 (2006) 127 [hep- ph/0603237]

    2006

  5. [12]

    Hosotani, N

    Y. Hosotani, N. Maru, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, Two loop finiteness of Higgs mass and potential in the gauge-Higgs unification , Prog. Theor. Phys. 118 (2007) 1053 [arXiv:0709.2844 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Hisano, Y

    J. Hisano, Y. Shoji and A. Yamada, To be, or not to be finite? The Higgs potential in Gauge Higgs Unification , JHEP 02 (2020) 193 [arXiv:1908.09158 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [14]

    M. Kubo, C. S. Lim and H. Yamashita, The Hosotani mechanism in bulk gauge theories with an orbifold extra space S1/Z2, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 2249 [hep-ph/0111327]

    2002 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Csaki, C

    C. Csaki, C. Grojean and H. Murayama, Standard model Higgs from higher dimensional gauge fields , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 085012 [hep-ph/0210133]

    2003 arXiv

  9. [16]

    C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak symmetry breaking and fermion masses from extra dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 669 (2003) 128 [hep-ph/0304220]

    2003 arXiv

  10. [17]

    N. Haba, Y. Hosotani, Y. Kawamura and T. Yamashita, Dynamical symmetry breaking in gauge Higgs unification on orbifold , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 015010 [hep-ph/0401183]

    2004 arXiv

  11. [18]

    C. S. Lim and N. Maru, Towards a realistic grand gauge-Higgs unification , Phys. Lett. B 653 (2007) 320 [arXiv:0706.1397 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Hosotani and N

    Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, Gauge–Higgs grand unification , Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015 (2015) 111B01 [arXiv:1504.03817 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Maru and Y

    N. Maru and Y. Yatagai, Fermion Mass Hierarchy in Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification , Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019 (2019) 083B03 [arXiv:1903.08359 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Kojima, K

    K. Kojima, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, The Standard Model Gauge Symmetry from Higher-Rank Unified Groups in Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification Models , JHEP 06 (2017) 018 [arXiv:1704.04840 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Kojima, K

    K. Kojima, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 051701 [arXiv:1103.1234 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Yamashita, Doublet-Triplet Splitting in an SU(5) Grand Unification , Phys

    T. Yamashita, Doublet-Triplet Splitting in an SU(5) Grand Unification , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115016 [arXiv:1106.3229 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Kojima, K

    K. Kojima, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, Gauge symmetry breaking patterns in an SU(5) grand gauge-Higgs unification model , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 015021 [arXiv:1608.05496 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Kojima, K

    K. Kojima, K. Takenaga and T. Yamashita, Grand gauge-Higgs unification on T2/Z3 via the diagonal embedding method , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 035031 [arXiv:2304.05701 [hep-ph]]. 32

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Kakizaki, S

    M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, H. Taniguchi and T. Yamashita, Higgs sector as a probe of supersymmetric grand unification with the Hosotani mechanism , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075013 [arXiv:1312.7575 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Nakano, M

    H. Nakano, M. Sato, O. Seto and T. Yamashita, Dirac gaugino from grand gauge-Higgs unification, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022 (2022) 033B06 [arXiv:2201.04428 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Hosotani, Dynamical mass generation by compact extra dimensions, Phys

    Y. Hosotani, Dynamical mass generation by compact extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 309

    1983

  22. [29]

    Hosotani, Dynamics of Nonintegrable Phases and Gauge Symmetry Breaking , Ann

    Y. Hosotani, Dynamics of Nonintegrable Phases and Gauge Symmetry Breaking , Ann. of Phys 190 (1989) 233

    1989

  23. [30]

    N. Haba, M. Harada, Y. Hosotani and Y. Kawamura, Dynamical rearrangement of gauge symmetry on the Orbifold S1/Z2, Nucl. Phys. B 657 (2003) 169 [Errata ibid B 669 (2003) 381] [hep-ph/0212035]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [31]

    N. Haba, Y. Hosotani and Y. Kawamura, Classification and Dynamics of Equivalence Classes in SU (N ) gauge theory on the orbifold S1/Z2, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111 (2004) 265 [hep-ph/0309088]

    2004 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Haba and T

    N. Haba and T. Yamashita, A General formula of the effective potential in 5-D SU(N) gauge theory on orbifold , JHEP 02 (2004) 059 [hep-ph/0401185]

    2004 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Kawamura, E

    Y. Kawamura, E. Kodaira, K. Kojima and T. Yamashita, On representation matrices of boundary conditions in SU(n) gauge theories compactified on two-dimensional orbifolds , JHEP 04 (2023) 113 [arXiv:2211.00877 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Takeuchi and T

    K. Takeuchi and T. Inagaki, New Classification Method for Equivalence Classes on S1/Z2 and T2/Z3 Orbifolds , Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024 (2024) 033B03 [arXiv:2401.09809 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Takeuchi and T

    K. Takeuchi and T. Inagaki, Trace Conservation Laws in T2/Zm Orbifold Gauge Theories, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024 (2024) 063B04 [arXiv:2404.19411 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    C. A. Scrucca and M. Serone, Anomalies in field theories with extra dimensions , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 2579 [hep-th/0403163]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [37]

    F¨ orste, H

    S. F¨ orste, H. P. Nilles and A. Wingerter,Geometry of Rank Reduction, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 026001 [hep-ph/0504117]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [38]

    von Gersdorff, N

    G. von Gersdorff, N. Irges and M. Quiros, Radiative brane mass terms in D greater than 5 orbifold gauge theories , Phys. Lett. B 551 (2003) 351 [hep-ph/0210134]

    2003 arXiv

  32. [39]

    C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, L. Silvestrini and A. Wulzer,Gauge Higgs unification in orbifold models, JHEP 02 (2004) 049 [hep-th/0312267]

    2004 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Antoniadis, K

    I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli and M. Quiros, Finite Higgs mass without supersymmetry , New J. Phys. 3 (2001), 20 [arXiv:hep-th/0108005 [hep-th]]. 33

    2001 arXiv

  34. [41]

    W. F. Chang, S. K. Kang and J. Park, Two Higgs Doublets Model in Gauge-Higgs Unifi- cation framework, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.9, 095005 [arXiv:1206.3366 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Matsumoto and Y

    Y. Matsumoto and Y. Sakamura, 6D gauge-Higgs unification on T 2 /ZN with custodial symmetry, JHEP 08 (2014), 175 [arXiv:1407.0133 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Hasegawa, C

    K. Hasegawa, C. S. Lim and N. Maru, Predictions of the Higgs mass and the weak mix- ing angle in the 6D gauge-Higgs unification , J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 85 (2016) no.7, 074101 [arXiv:1509.04818 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Akamatsu, T

    K. Akamatsu, T. Hirose, N. Maru and A. Nago, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Two Higgs Doublet Model from 6D Gauge-Higgs Unification on T 2/Z2, [arXiv:2312.08608 [hep- ph]]

    arXiv

  38. [45]

    ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979), 141-160

    1979

  39. [46]

    von Gersdorff, A New Class of Rank Breaking Orbifolds , Nucl

    G. von Gersdorff, A New Class of Rank Breaking Orbifolds , Nucl. Phys. B 793 (2008), 192-210 [arXiv:0705.2410 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Z. G. Berezhiani, Horizontal Symmetry and Quark - Lepton Mass Spectrum: The SU(5) x SU(3)-h Model , Phys. Lett. B 150 (1985) 177

    1985

  41. [48]

    Yanagida, Naturally light Higgs doublets in the supersymmetric grand unified theories with dynamical symmetry breaking , Phys

    T. Yanagida, Naturally light Higgs doublets in the supersymmetric grand unified theories with dynamical symmetry breaking , Phys. Lett. B 344 (1995) 211 [hep-ph/9409329]

    1995 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Hisano and T

    J. Hisano and T. Yanagida, An N not = 2 SUSY gauge model for dynamical breaking of the grand unified SU(5) symmetry , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10 (1995) 3097 [hep-ph/9510277]

    1995 arXiv

  43. [50]

    K. I. Izawa and T. Yanagida, R invariant natural unification , Prog. Theor. Phys. 97 (1997) 913 [hep-ph/9703350]

    1997 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Slansky, Group Theory for Unified Model Building , Phys

    R. Slansky, Group Theory for Unified Model Building , Phys. Rept. 79 (1981) 1

    1981

  45. [52]

    Yamatsu, Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building, [arXiv:1511.08771 [hep-ph]]

    N. Yamatsu, Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building, [arXiv:1511.08771 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  46. [53]

    Bhardwaj, Classification of 6d N = (1 , 0) gauge theories , JHEP 11 (2015), 002 [arXiv:1502.06594 [hep-th]]

    L. Bhardwaj, Classification of 6d N = (1 , 0) gauge theories , JHEP 11 (2015), 002 [arXiv:1502.06594 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    N. Haba, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada and T. Yamashita, Effective theoretical approach of Gauge-Higgs unification model and its phenomenological applications , JHEP 02 (2006) 073 [arXiv:hep-ph/0511046 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Goto and Y

    Y. Goto and Y. Kawamura, Orbifold family unification using vectorlike representation on six dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035039 [arXiv:1712.06444]. 34

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Y. Goto, Y. Kawamura and T. Miura, Orbifold family unification on six dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055016 [arXiv:1307.2631]. 35

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.