Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Gauss-Bonnet-induced symmetry breaking/restoration during inflation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A scalar coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term acquires an inflaton-dependent squared mass, so its symmetry can break or restore in the middle of inflation without changing the inflationary predictions.

desk verdict Clean proof-of-principle for GB-induced mid-inflation symmetry transitions, but the 'predictions unaffected' claim outruns the perturbation analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08986 v2 pith:EZONIX3T submitted 2025-02-13 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

Yermek Aldabergenov , Daulet Berkimbayev This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thastro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords Gauss-Bonnetcouplingsymmetrybreakingduringinflationrestorationinflationaryphasetransitionschargedscalarisocurvatureperturbationsgravitationalwavesslow-roll
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a new way to trigger phase transitions during inflation. When a charged scalar is coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet curvature invariant, the scalar's effective squared mass at the symmetric point becomes $V_{\rm eff,\phi\phi}(0)=V_{\phi\phi}(0)+\frac{1}{3}\xi_{\phi\phi}(0)V^2(0)$, so the height of the inflaton potential controls the stability of the symmetric vacuum. As the inflaton rolls and $V_{\rm inf}$ decreases, this effective mass can cross zero and change sign, spontaneously breaking an initially symmetric vacuum or restoring an initially broken one. The paper also shows that when the Gauss-Bonnet slow-roll parameter and its derivative stay small compared with the inflaton slow-roll parameter, the backreaction on the background is negligible and the standard single-field predictions are unaffected. This gives inflationary model builders a symmetry-changing dial that does not spoil existing agreement with observations.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}=V+\frac{1}{3}\int d\phi\,\xi_{,\phi}V^2$, built from the scalar potential $V(\phi)$ and the Gauss-Bonnet coupling $\xi(\phi)$. The Gauss-Bonnet term is the quadratic curvature combination $R_{\rm GB}^2=R^2-4R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}+R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$, which is topological in four dimensions when uncoupled but becomes dynamical through $\xi(\phi)$. The mechanism works because the second term in $V_{\rm eff}$ depends on $V^2$, so replacing a constant vacuum energy with the slowly decreasing inflaton potential makes the effective mass of $\phi$ at the origin time-dependent. The explicit derivations use the quartic forms $V=V_0+\frac12 m^2\phi^2+\frac14\lambda\phi^4$ and $\xi=\frac12\alpha\phi^2+\frac14\beta\phi^4$, together with the backreaction-suppression condition Eq. (35), to obtain analytical predictions for the critical e-fold at which symmetry is restored or broken.

What would settle it

Run the two-field system with a scalar mass much smaller than the value $m=10^{-4}$ used in the example and record the e-fold at which $\phi$ actually reaches the new minimum relative to the e-fold where $V_{\rm eff,\phi\phi}(0)$ changes sign; a lag of more than a few e-folds, or a failure of $\phi$ to relax during inflation, would falsify the adiabatic transition-time prediction. Alternatively, a detected CMB isocurvature component at a level excluded by the single-field approximation would falsify the no-backreaction condition Eq. (35).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Gauss-Bonnet coupling function $\xi(\phi)$, taken up to quartic order, converts the vacuum energy into a contribution to the scalar's mass squared around $\phi=0$. In an inflationary background one replaces the constant $V_0$ by the decreasing $V_{\rm inf}(\chi)$, so the inequality $|\xi_{\phi\phi}(0)|V_{\rm inf}^2 > 3|V_{\phi\phi}(0)|$ can hold early and fail later, or vice versa. The transition is controlled by the critical condition $V_{\rm inf}^2(t_c)=3m^2/|\alpha|$ for a positive-mass scalar with negative $\alpha$, and by the analogous threshold in Eq. (22) for a tachyonic scalar stabilized by the Gauss-Bonnet coupling. The authors derive slow-roll solutions for the inflaton and for the symmetry-breaking scalar, impose Eq. (35) so that the Gauss-Bonnet backreaction is subdominant to the inflationary slow-roll parameters, and verify with numerical integration that the trajectory reproduces single-field behavior while the scalar's vacuum changes around a chosen e-fold count.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical solution assumes the charged scalar instantaneously follows the slowly moving minimum of its effective potential, so if the field's kinetic energy or Hubble drag is not negligible at the transition, the actual symmetry change arrives later than the predicted critical e-fold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A scalar that starts in a symmetric vacuum will spontaneously break its symmetry when $V_{\rm inf}(\chi)$ drops below the threshold $V_{\rm inf}^2(t_c)=3m^2/|\alpha|$, and a scalar that starts broken will restore its symmetry when the same threshold is crossed, possibly while inflation is still producing observable scales.
  • Because the sign of the effective mass is set by the inflaton potential height, the transition time can be tuned by choosing the strength of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling; the illustrative example places symmetry restoration around 30 e-folds after the CMB reference scale exits the horizon.
  • When Eq. (35) is satisfied, the scalar and tensor power spectra remain practically identical to single-field inflation, so the mechanism can be attached to any observationally viable single-field model without altering its predictions.
  • In the symmetry-breaking case, quantum fluctuations decide which sign the field takes in different Hubble patches, so the process is naturally accompanied by domain walls, or by cosmic strings in a $U(1)$ version.
  • The same sign-flip logic can be run in reverse: starting from a broken potential and adding the Gauss-Bonnet term restores symmetry early, then symmetry breaking happens mid-inflation, with damped oscillations around the new minimum perturbing the slow-roll parameters only transiently.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the mechanism to a complex scalar with $U(1)$ symmetry would produce cosmic strings rather than domain walls; the paper notes this possibility and a lattice simulation of string formation at the transition would be a natural next test.
  • If the same coupling were applied to the Standard Model Higgs during reheating, the inflaton-dependent sign flip could generate lepton-number production as the Higgs relaxes from a Gauss-Bonnet-induced VEV, paralleling known Higgs-condensate leptogenesis scenarios.
  • In the opposite regime, where $|\omega|\sim\epsilon$ rather than $|\omega|\ll\epsilon$, backreaction becomes large; one can infer that such models could enhance scalar curvature perturbations at sub-CMB scales and possibly source a gravitational-wave signature, making the transition observationally distinguishable.
  • The analytical transition time rests on adiabatic tracking, and the numerical example already shows a delay of a few e-folds, so a systematic scan of the scalar mass would quantify how much the analytic critical e-fold underestimates the true restoration time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a real scalar field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term can experience a sign change in its effective squared mass during inflation, because the effective mass contains a contribution proportional to the inflationary potential squared, Veff,φφ(0)=V,φφ(0)+(1/3)ξ,φφ(0)Vinf^2 (Eq. (9)). Since Vinf decreases during slow roll, the symmetry can break or restore in the middle of inflation. The authors derive the relevant stationary-point conditions and effective VEVs for quartic potentials and GB couplings, adapt the formalism to a Starobinsky-driven background by replacing V0 with Vinf(χ), and impose |ω|,|ω'|≪ε (Eq. (35)) to suppress backreaction. They then construct explicit benchmark scenarios for symmetry restoration and symmetry breaking, compare analytic slow-roll solutions with numerical integration (Figs. 1 and 2), and conclude that the predictions of the underlying single-field model are unaffected.

Significance. If the central claim is fully established, the mechanism is a genuinely new route to phase transitions during inflation, complementing direct inflaton-scalar couplings and non-minimal curvature couplings. The background-level algebraic derivations are coherent, the slow-roll solutions are carefully checked against numerics, and the paper is explicit about the parameters it chooses and about the assumptions it makes. The paper also correctly identifies the regimes where the approximation fails, for example the kinetic-energy delay near the transition. The main weakness is that the headline claim about unchanged power spectra goes beyond what is actually computed: no second-order perturbation calculation is presented, so the isocurvature and curvature perturbations sourced by the spectator are not bounded. The mechanism is a plausible proof of principle for background dynamics, but the advertised invariance of CMB observables is conditional on an unperformed multi-field perturbation analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.A around Eq. (48); Conclusions] The claim that scalar and tensor power spectra receive negligible GB corrections is not established by Eq. (35). That condition, and the numerical demonstration in Fig. 1, control only the homogeneous background. A spectator field whose effective mass crosses zero near Nc≈30 can generate superhorizon isocurvature and non-adiabatic curvature perturbations even when its energy density and |ω|,|ω'| are tiny. The paper explicitly defers the "separate analysis of the multi-field perturbations" and cites [65] without deriving a concrete bound, so the benchmark m=10^-4 is not shown to satisfy any isocurvature constraint. The abstract and Conclusions nevertheless state that the predictions of the single-field model are unaffected. Please either compute the isocurvature/curvature power spectra and the resulting parameter constraints, or revise the claims to refer only to the absence of background backreaction and present the mechanism as a proof of principle for the homogeneous dynamics.
  2. [Section III.A, Eqs. (42)-(44)] The analytic transition time Nc assumes that φ adiabatically follows the instantaneous minimum νeff(N) of the effective potential. The paper itself notes that for small m the kinetic energy can delay relaxation and the actual restoration can be shifted by a few efoldings (Section III.A and Fig. 1), and in the symmetry-breaking scenario of Section III.B the delay for small ν is described as considerable. Since the phase-transition time is one of the main outputs of the mechanism, the paper should either quantify this delay analytically or explicitly present Nc as an approximate, order-of-magnitude quantity rather than as a precise prediction of the model.
  3. [Section II.A, Eq. (16)] The paper states that a second condition is the existence of a stable de Sitter minimum of Veff, but it never derives the stability condition for the approximate VEV in Eq. (16). In particular, the denominator V0^2 β+3λ must be positive and the second derivative of Veff at νeff must be positive, yet no general criterion is given. The numerical benchmarks appear to satisfy these requirements, but the paper's stated general conditions for GB-induced symmetry breaking would be complete only if the stability inequalities were spelled out.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The field is called a "charged scalar" throughout, but the symmetry used is Z2 with a real scalar. If a complex scalar with U(1) symmetry is intended, the equations in Section II need to be adapted; otherwise, please replace "charged" with "real" or "Z2-charged" for consistency.
  2. [Eq. (43)] Equation (43) is typeset ambiguously; the displayed expression "μ = 49M/121/450√m" is not a clear closed form. Please rewrite it with explicit radicals or parentheses so that the benchmark value can be reproduced unambiguously.
  3. [Section III.A around Eq. (48)] The statement that "m cannot be arbitrarily smaller than the inflaton mass" is imprecise, since the Starobinsky model does not have a unique inflaton mass in the usual sense. The relevant comparison for isocurvature production is with H, and the text should say so.
  4. [Figs. 1 and 2] In the bottom-left panels, η is plotted on a logarithmic axis that necessarily crosses zero; please clarify whether the displayed quantity is |η| or whether a small offset is used, so that the reader can interpret the transient behaviour correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GB-induced effective mass follows from the EOM, and the transition time is an explicitly chosen parameter.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The effective potential (7) is obtained from the stationary-point condition (6) by substituting H^2 = V/3, and the effective-mass formula (9) is its second derivative; the sign-change condition (10) is then an algebraic comparison of the same terms, not an imported result. In the inflationary section, the same formula is reused with V0 -> Vinf(chi), an approximation explicitly stated in Section III: 'The results of the previous section can be applied by replacing V0 -> Vinf(chi)'. The critical-time relation (42) is used to fix the GB parameter mu (or alpha) from a chosen Nc; the text says 'alpha can be fixed by our choice of the critical time tc, or Nc', so the transition time is a parameter choice for a proof of principle, not a fitted quantity disguised as a prediction. The no-backreaction condition (35) is imposed before deriving the slow-roll solution, and the claim that single-field predictions are unaffected is explicitly tied to this suppression; the paper itself flags that precise isocurvature constraints require a separate multi-field perturbation analysis 'beyond the scope of this work'. That is an admitted gap in the argument, not a circular reduction. Citations to [62], [63], and [71] are contextual, credit-giving, or used for effects already suppressed by (35); none carries the derivation. No step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The mechanism's quantitative statements (transition time, backreaction suppression, effective VEVs) depend on six hand-chosen parameters and on four modeling assumptions: the effective-potential/adiabatic reduction, quartic truncation, the no-backreaction condition, and the representative Starobinsky background. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • alpha (GB quadratic coupling) = |alpha| = 1/mu^4 with mu fixed by Nc = 30 via Eq. (43)
    Chosen to place the critical point at the desired e-fold time; not derived from independent data.
  • m (phi mass) = 10^-4 in numerical example
    Bounded above by Eq. (47) to suppress GB backreaction, and bounded below to avoid isocurvature overproduction and kinetic-energy delay of the transition.
  • lambda (quartic self-coupling) = 0.1
    Fixed by hand for perturbativity (lambda << 1).
  • M (Starobinsky mass) = 1.28 x 10^-5
    Fixed by matching the CMB amplitude As ~ 2.1 x 10^-9 in Eq. (41).
  • nu (VEV in restoration scenario) = 10^-3
    Chosen so that the GB backreaction stays small; larger nu breaks the approximation (20), smaller nu delays symmetry breaking.
  • Nc (critical e-fold) = 30
    The paper chooses the transition to occur 30 e-folds after horizon exit; determines alpha/mu via Eqs. (42)-(43).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The effective potential Veff = V + (1/3) integral xi,phi V^2 d phi (Eq. 7) correctly describes the stationary points and the effective mass of phi during quasi-de Sitter inflation when V0 is replaced by Vinf(chi).
    Used throughout Sections II and III to derive the sign-change conditions and the critical times; it assumes phi is quasi-static and H^2 = V/3 at the stationary point.
  • domain assumption V(phi) and xi(phi) truncated at quartic order suffice to capture the mechanism.
    The paper works with V = V0 + (1/2)m^2 phi^2 + (1/4)lambda phi^4 and xi = (1/2)alpha phi^2 + (1/4)beta phi^4; higher-order terms could alter the effective potential and the conditions (10) and (22).
  • domain assumption The no-backreaction slow-roll conditions |omega|, |omega'| << epsilon << 1 (Eq. 35) guarantee that the inflationary background and its power spectra match single-field results.
    This is the basis of the claim that CMB predictions are unaffected; the paper argues from this condition rather than computing the multi-field perturbation spectra.
  • domain assumption The Starobinsky/alpha-attractor potential (Eq. 29) is a representative viable single-field inflationary model; any CMB-consistent model would do.
    Used for the explicit numerical examples; the mechanism itself is model-independent in the authors' construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gauss-Bonnet-induced symmetry breaking/restoration during inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZONIX3T

@misc{pith2026250208986,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gauss-Bonnet-induced symmetry breaking/restoration during inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZONIX3T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08986}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a mechanism of symmetry breaking or restoration that can occur in the middle of inflation due to the coupling of the Gauss-Bonnet term to a charged scalar. The Gauss-Bonnet coupling results in an inflaton-dependent effective squared mass of the charged scalar, which can change its sign (around the symmetric point) during inflation. This can lead to spontaneous breaking of the symmetry, or to its restoration, if it is initially broken. We show the conditions under which the backreaction of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling on the inflationary background is negligible, such that the predictions of a given inflationary model are unaffected by the symmetry breaking/restoration process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08986 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Numerical inflationary solution for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Numerical inflationary solution for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [65]

    no-backreaction

    (although it would also depend on possible ϕ − χ couplings). As for more precise isocurvature constraints on the parameters, it requires a separate analysis of the multi-field perturbations in the presence of the GB term, which is beyond the scope of this work. Finally, let us show the full numerical solution for χ and ϕ, and how it compares to our analyt...

    work page

  2. [1]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, P. Carrilho, T. Clifton, and D. J. Mulryne, “The 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory of 4 In principle, one can consider different functions for V (ϕ) and ξ(ϕ) under suitable conditions for GB-induced symmetry break- ing. The condition for the absence of GB backreaction on infla- tion would be unchanged, and is given by (35) in terms of th...

    arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Evolution of cosmological perturbations in nonsingular string cosmologies,

    C. Cartier, J.-c. Hwang, and E. J. Copeland, “Evolution of cosmological perturbations in nonsingular string cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 103504, arXiv:astro-ph/0106197

    arXiv 2001

  4. [3]

    Realizing scale-invariant density perturbations in low-energy effective string theory,

    Z.-K. Guo, N. Ohta, and S. Tsujikawa, “Realizing scale-invariant density perturbations in low-energy effective string theory,” Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 023520, arXiv:hep-th/0610336

    arXiv 2007

  5. [4]

    Higher Curvature Corrections 8 to Primordial Fluctuations in Slow-roll Inflation,

    M. Satoh and J. Soda, “Higher Curvature Corrections 8 to Primordial Fluctuations in Slow-roll Inflation,” JCAP 09 (2008) 019, arXiv:0806.4594 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [5]

    Power spectra from an inflaton coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term,

    Z.-K. Guo and D. J. Schwarz, “Power spectra from an inflaton coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 063523, arXiv:0907.0427 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  7. [6]

    Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction,

    Z.-K. Guo and D. J. Schwarz, “Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction,” Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123520, arXiv:1001.1897 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [7]

    Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,

    P.-X. Jiang, J.-W. Hu, and Z.-K. Guo, “Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 123508, arXiv:1310.5579 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Observational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,

    S. Koh, B.-H. Lee, W. Lee, and G. Tumurtushaa, “Observational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D90 no. 6, (2014) 063527, arXiv:1404.6096 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Inflation with Gauss-Bonnet coupling,

    Z. Yi, Y. Gong, and M. Sabir, “Inflation with Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 8, (2018) 083521, arXiv:1804.09116 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Viable Inflation in Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity and Reconstruction from Observational Indices,

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Viable Inflation in Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity and Reconstruction from Observational Indices,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 4, (2018) 044039, arXiv:1808.05045 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Inflationary Phenomenology of Einstein Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Compatible with GW170817,

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Inflationary Phenomenology of Einstein Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Compatible with GW170817,” Phys. Lett. B797 (2019) 134874, arXiv:1908.07555 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Inflation with a quartic potential in the framework of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    E. O. Pozdeeva, M. R. Gangopadhyay, M. Sami, A. V. Toporensky, and S. Y. Vernov, “Inflation with a quartic potential in the framework of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D102 no. 4, (2020) 043525, arXiv:2006.08027 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    New slow-roll approximations for inflation in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    E. O. Pozdeeva, M. A. Skugoreva, A. V. Toporensky, and S. Y. Vernov, “New slow-roll approximations for inflation in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” JCAP 09 (2024) 050, arXiv:2403.06147 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Singularity - free cosmological solutions of the superstring effective action,

    I. Antoniadis, J. Rizos, and K. Tamvakis, “Singularity - free cosmological solutions of the superstring effective action,” Nucl. Phys. B415 (1994) 497–514, arXiv:hep-th/9305025

    1994 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Instability of one loop superstring cosmology,

    S. Kawai, M.-a. Sakagami, and J. Soda, “Instability of one loop superstring cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B437 (1998) 284–290, arXiv:gr-qc/9802033

    1998 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Evolution of fluctuations during graceful exit in string cosmology,

    S. Kawai and J. Soda, “Evolution of fluctuations during graceful exit in string cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B460 (1999) 41–46, arXiv:gr-qc/9903017

    1999 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Effective Field Theory for Inflation,

    S. Weinberg, “Effective Field Theory for Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 123541, arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gauss-Bonnet dark energy,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sasaki, “Gauss-Bonnet dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 123509, arXiv:hep-th/0504052

    2005 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Dark energy and cosmological solutions in second-order string gravity,

    G. Calcagni, S. Tsujikawa, and M. Sami, “Dark energy and cosmological solutions in second-order string gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.22 (2005) 3977–4006, arXiv:hep-th/0505193

    2005 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity and its reconstruction,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sami, “Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity and its reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 046004, arXiv:hep-th/0605039

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    String-inspired cosmology: Late time transition from scaling matter era to dark energy universe caused by a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,

    S. Tsujikawa and M. Sami, “String-inspired cosmology: Late time transition from scaling matter era to dark energy universe caused by a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” JCAP 01 (2007) 006, arXiv:hep-th/0608178

    2007 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Gauss-Bonnet Quintessence: Background Evolution, Large Scale Structure and Cosmological Constraints,

    T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, “Gauss-Bonnet Quintessence: Background Evolution, Large Scale Structure and Cosmological Constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 023518, arXiv:hep-th/0609155

    2007 arXiv

  16. [23]

    On compatibility of string effective action with an accelerating universe,

    I. P. Neupane, “On compatibility of string effective action with an accelerating universe,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 7493–7520, arXiv:hep-th/0602097

    2006 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Dynamical analysis for a scalar–tensor model with Gauss–Bonnet and non-minimal couplings,

    L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, “Dynamical analysis for a scalar–tensor model with Gauss–Bonnet and non-minimal couplings,” Eur. Phys. J. C77 no. 10, (2017) 679, arXiv:1710.04760 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Autonomous dynamical system of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmologies,

    N. Chatzarakis and V. K. Oikonomou, “Autonomous dynamical system of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmologies,” Annals Phys. 419 (2020) 168216, arXiv:1908.08141 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Stability analysis of de Sitter solutions in models with the Gauss-Bonnet term,

    E. O. Pozdeeva, M. Sami, A. V. Toporensky, and S. Y. Vernov, “Stability analysis of de Sitter solutions in models with the Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 8, (2019) 083527, arXiv:1905.05085 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [27]

    De Sitter Solutions in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity,

    S. Vernov and E. Pozdeeva, “De Sitter Solutions in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity,” Universe 7 no. 5, (2021) 149, arXiv:2104.11111 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    CMB from a Gauss-Bonnet-induced de Sitter fixed point,

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, “CMB from a Gauss-Bonnet-induced de Sitter fixed point,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 4, (2021) 043525, arXiv:2105.04386 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet model, the coincidence problem and the gravitational wave speed,

    H. Mohseni Sadjadi, “Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet model, the coincidence problem and the gravitational wave speed,” Phys. Lett. B850 (2024) 138508, arXiv:2309.07816 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    ΛCDM-like evolution in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    M. A. S. Pinto and J. a. L. Rosa, “ΛCDM-like evolution in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” arXiv:2411.04066 [gr-qc]

  24. [31]

    Hybrid inflation,

    A. D. Linde, “Hybrid inflation,” Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 748–754, arXiv:astro-ph/9307002

    1994 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation,

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, “Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation,” Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 6040–6058, arXiv:astro-ph/9605094

    1996 arXiv

  26. [33]

    The Spectrum of curvature perturbations from hybrid inflation,

    J. Garcia-Bellido and D. Wands, “The Spectrum of curvature perturbations from hybrid inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 7181–7185, arXiv:astro-ph/9606047

    1996 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Non-minimally coupled hybrid inflation,

    S. Koh and M. Minamitsuji, “Non-minimally coupled hybrid inflation,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 046009, arXiv:1011.4655 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Quintessential Affleck-Dine baryogenesis with non-minimal couplings,

    D. Bettoni and J. Rubio, “Quintessential Affleck-Dine baryogenesis with non-minimal couplings,” Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 122–129, arXiv:1805.02669 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings in quintessential inflation,

    D. Bettoni, G. Dom` enech, and J. Rubio, “Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings in quintessential inflation,” JCAP 02 (2019) 034, arXiv:1810.11117 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hubble-induced phase transitions: Walls are not forever,

    D. Bettoni and J. Rubio, “Hubble-induced phase transitions: Walls are not forever,” JCAP 01 (2020) 002, arXiv:1911.03484 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Hubble-induced phase transitions on the lattice with applications to Ricci reheating,

    D. Bettoni, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Rubio, “Hubble-induced phase transitions on the lattice with applications to Ricci reheating,” JCAP 01 no. 01, (2022) 002, arXiv:2107.09671 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [39]

    The effect of non-minimally coupled scalar field on gravitational waves from first-order vacuum phase transitions,

    A. S. Arapo˘ glu and A. E. Y¨ ukselci, “The effect of non-minimally coupled scalar field on gravitational waves from first-order vacuum phase transitions,” Phys. Dark Univ. 40 (2023) 101176, arXiv:2210.16699 [gr-qc]. 9

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    From Hubble to Bubble,

    M. Kierkla, G. Laverda, M. Lewicki, A. Mantziris, M. Piani, J. Rubio, and M. Zych, “From Hubble to Bubble,” JHEP 11 (2023) 077, arXiv:2309.08530 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Ricci reheating reloaded,

    G. Laverda and J. Rubio, “Ricci reheating reloaded,” JCAP 03 (2024) 033, arXiv:2307.03774 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: JCAP 06, E01 (2024)]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Non-minimally coupled quintessence in the Gauss-Bonnet model, symmetry breaking, and cosmic acceleration,

    H. Mohseni Sadjadi, “Non-minimally coupled quintessence in the Gauss-Bonnet model, symmetry breaking, and cosmic acceleration,” arXiv:2310.03697 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Meso-inflationary Peccei–Quinn Symmetry Breaking with Nonminimal Coupling,

    Y. Aldabergenov, D. Ding, W. Lin, and Y. Wan, “Meso-inflationary Peccei–Quinn Symmetry Breaking with Nonminimal Coupling,” Astrophys. J. Suppl.275 no. 1, (2024) 14, arXiv:2406.15818 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Hubble-Induced Phase Transitions: Gravitational-Wave Imprint of Ricci Reheating from Lattice Simulations,

    D. Bettoni, G. Laverda, A. L. Eiguren, and J. Rubio, “Hubble-Induced Phase Transitions: Gravitational-Wave Imprint of Ricci Reheating from Lattice Simulations,” arXiv:2409.15450 [gr-qc]

  38. [45]

    Warm inflation,

    A. Berera, “Warm inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 3218–3221, arXiv:astro-ph/9509049

    1995 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Spontaneous breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry during warm inflation,

    J. a. G. Rosa and L. B. Ventura, “Spontaneous breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry during warm inflation,” arXiv:2105.05771 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Superheavy dark matter production from a symmetry-restoring first-order phase transition during inflation,

    H. An, X. Tong, and S. Zhou, “Superheavy dark matter production from a symmetry-restoring first-order phase transition during inflation,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 2, (2023) 023522, arXiv:2208.14857 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Nonperturbative production of massless scalars during inflation and generation of gravitational waves,

    C. Goolsby-Cole and L. Sorbo, “Nonperturbative production of massless scalars during inflation and generation of gravitational waves,” JCAP 08 (2017) 005, arXiv:1705.03755 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Gravitational waves from an inflation triggered first-order phase transition,

    H. An, K.-F. Lyu, L.-T. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Gravitational waves from an inflation triggered first-order phase transition,” JHEP 06 (2022) 050, arXiv:2201.05171 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Gravitational waves from incomplete inflationary phase transitions,

    J. Barir, M. Geller, C. Sun, and T. Volansky, “Gravitational waves from incomplete inflationary phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D108 no. 11, (2023) 115016, arXiv:2203.00693 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Phase transition during inflation and the gravitational wave signal at pulsar timing arrays,

    H. An, B. Su, H. Tai, L.-T. Wang, and C. Yang, “Phase transition during inflation and the gravitational wave signal at pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 12, (2024) L121304, arXiv:2308.00070 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  45. [52]

    Large non-Gaussianities corresponding to first-order phase transitions during inflation,

    H. An, Q. Chen, Y. Li, and Y. Yin, “Large non-Gaussianities corresponding to first-order phase transitions during inflation,” arXiv:2411.12699 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [53]

    Particle production from symmetry breaking after inflation,

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, “Particle production from symmetry breaking after inflation,” Phys. Lett. B536 (2002) 193–202, arXiv:hep-ph/0109230

    2002 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Leptogenesis via neutrino production during Higgs condensate relaxation,

    L. Pearce, L. Yang, A. Kusenko, and M. Peloso, “Leptogenesis via neutrino production during Higgs condensate relaxation,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 2, (2015) 023509, arXiv:1505.02461 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Leptogenesis via Higgs Condensate Relaxation,

    L. Yang, L. Pearce, and A. Kusenko, “Leptogenesis via Higgs Condensate Relaxation,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 4, (2015) 043506, arXiv:1505.07912 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale,

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran, “Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115 no. 22, (2015) 221801, arXiv:1504.07551 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [57]

    On the violent preheating in the mixed Higgs- R2 inflationary model,

    M. He, R. Jinno, K. Kamada, S. C. Park, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, “On the violent preheating in the mixed Higgs- R2 inflationary model,” Phys. Lett. B791 (2019) 36–42, arXiv:1812.10099 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,” JHEP 05 (2018) 011, arXiv:1711.03988 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,

    Y.-P. Wu, “Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,” JHEP 04 (2019) 125, arXiv:1812.10654 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Ricci Reheating,

    T. Opferkuch, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stefanek, “Ricci Reheating,” JCAP 07 (2019) 016, arXiv:1905.06823 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Leptogenesis from spontaneous symmetry breaking during inflation,

    Y.-P. Wu, L. Yang, and A. Kusenko, “Leptogenesis from spontaneous symmetry breaking during inflation,” JHEP 12 (2019) 088, arXiv:1905.10537 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Baryogenesis via gravitational spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    Q. Liang, J. Sakstein, and M. Trodden, “Baryogenesis via gravitational spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 6, (2019) 063518, arXiv:1904.10510 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Early dark energy and scalarization in a scalar-tensor model,

    H. Mohseni Sadjadi, “Early dark energy and scalarization in a scalar-tensor model,” Phys. Lett. B 857 (2024) 138967, arXiv:2404.19695 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,” Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 6357–6368, arXiv:astro-ph/9407016

    1994 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Generation of Isothermal Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Universe,

    A. D. Linde, “Generation of Isothermal Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 375–380

    1985

  60. [68]

    Primordial black holes from Higgs inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,

    R. Kawaguchi and S. Tsujikawa, “Primordial black holes from Higgs inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 6, (2023) 063508, arXiv:2211.13364 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Primordial black holes from Gauss-Bonnet-corrected single field inflation,

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, “Primordial black holes from Gauss-Bonnet-corrected single field inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 083545, arXiv:2108.01340 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Primordial black holes in non-minimal Gauss–Bonnet inflation in light of the PTA data,

    M. Solbi and K. Karami, “Primordial black holes in non-minimal Gauss–Bonnet inflation in light of the PTA data,” Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 9, (2024) 918, arXiv:2403.00021 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    5 The resonance is triggered by oscillations of the scalar field with large GB coupling (and backreaction)

    it was shown that a two-field inflation, where one of the fields is coupled to the GB term, can produce sound speed resonance of GW, which can potentially be probed by future observations. 5 The resonance is triggered by oscillations of the scalar field with large GB coupling ...

  64. [72]

    Primordial Black Holes in Scalar Field Inflation Coupled to the Gauss–Bonnet Term with Fractional Power-law Potentials,

    A. Ashrafzadeh and K. Karami, “Primordial Black Holes in Scalar Field Inflation Coupled to the Gauss–Bonnet Term with Fractional Power-law Potentials,” Astrophys. J. 965 no. 1, (2024) 11, arXiv:2309.16356 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Sound speed resonance of gravitational waves in Gauss-Bonnet-coupled inflation,

    A. Addazi, Y. Aldabergenov, and Y. Cai, “Sound speed resonance of gravitational waves in Gauss-Bonnet-coupled inflation,” Phys. Rev. D110 no. 12, (2024) 123530, arXiv:2408.05091 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Probing the inflationary moduli space with gravitational waves,

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, “Probing the inflationary moduli space with gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D108 no. 10, (2023) 103537, arXiv:2308.13272 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.