Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 177 references

A Unifying View of OTFS and Its Many Variants

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that OTFS is a precoded FBMC scheme, that V-OFDM and OSDM are special cases of it under rectangular pulses and Nyquist sampling, and that all major OTFS variants share one linear receiver model under doubly-selective…

desk verdict A useful survey that correctly assembles the OTFS equivalence story, but the unified channel model and missing OFDM baselines keep it from being the authoritative comparison it aims to be. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09118 v1 pith:7DUXQKGI submitted 2025-02-13 eess.SP

Qinwen Deng , Yao Ge , Zhi Ding This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords OTFSdelay-DopplerdomaininversesymplecticfiniteFouriertransformdoubly-selectivefadingunifiedlinearreceivermodelhigh-mobilitywirelessOSDMvectorOFDM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey tries to dispel the confusion created by the many named variants of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation by showing that they are largely the same idea expressed through different transforms. It presents OTFS as a precoded filter-bank multicarrier (FBMC) scheme whose precoder is the inverse symplectic finite Fourier transform (ISFFT). With rectangular transceiver pulses and Nyquist-rate sampling, vector OFDM (V-OFDM) and orthogonal signal-division multiplexing (OSDM) reduce to exactly the same transmit and receive expressions as OTFS. The paper then derives one effective channel model for doubly-selective fading and shows that OTFS, V-OFDM, OSDM, OTSM, ODDM, OCDM, and AFDM all fit the same linear input-output form $y = Hx + w$. If the unification is right, detectors and performance comparisons developed for one variant transfer to all the others.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ISFFT precoder together with the Heisenberg transform, whose discrete matrix form for OTFS is $s = (F_N^H \otimes G)x$; with rectangular pulses the pulse matrix $G$ becomes the identity, so the expression collapses to the $(F_N^H \otimes I_M)$ block transform shared by OSDM and V-OFDM. Around that transform pair the paper builds the unified channel machinery: the sampled doubly-selective channel is written as a time-dependent circular convolution $h[c,p]$ over modulo-$MN$ indices, producing an equivalent channel matrix $H_{\mathrm{ch}}$, and every modulation's effective matrix has the same sandwich structure $H = T_{\mathrm{rx}} H_{\mathrm{ch}} T_{\mathrm{tx}}$ with its own transmit and receive transforms. This gives all variants the common form $y = Hx + w$ and lets detector complexity be analyzed uniformly through the sparsity or bandedness of $H$.

What would settle it

Run the same data block through V-OFDM, OSDM, and rectangular-pulse OTFS on one physical doubly-selective channel with Nyquist sampling and measure the effective channel matrices: the paper's equivalence predicts they coincide exactly, so any material discrepancy under sufficient CP length would falsify the unification, as would a demonstration that a CP shorter than the delay spread still yields identical outputs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that OTFS is not a separate waveform family but a precoding of FBMC: applying ISFFT to delay-Doppler symbols before the Heisenberg transform is exactly what distinguishes it from OFDM. Once the transmit and receive pulses are rectangular and sampling is at the Nyquist rate, the discrete OTFS signal becomes $s = (F_N^H \otimes I_M)x$, which is the same expression as OSDM and equivalent to V-OFDM's block transform $S = XF_N^H$; hence the paper treats V-OFDM and OSDM as special cases of OTFS. The paper further posits a sampled doubly-selective channel model $h[c,p]$ in which the received block is a circular convolution with modulo-$MN$ indexing, and from it obtains each variant's effective channel matrix by sandwiching $H_{\mathrm{ch}}$ between its modulation and demodulation transforms. The result is a single linear model $y = Hx + w$ covering all discussed variants, which is the basis for the receiver overview and complexity comparisons in the later sections.

Load-bearing premise

The unified model assumes the doubly-selective channel is a circular convolution with modulo-$MN$ indexing, which is only exact when the cyclic prefix exceeds the maximum delay spread and the per-sample gains fully track the time variation; in high-Doppler or very wideband conditions the circularity is approximate and every detector comparison built on it inherits that approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A detector built for OTFS with rectangular pulses applies unchanged to V-OFDM and OSDM, since their effective channel matrices coincide.
  • Apparent waveform advantages in PSD or BER are mostly pulse-shaping and filtering effects: the paper's simulations show OTFS-SRRC and ODDM nearly match each other, while OTFS-REC suffers from higher out-of-band emission and worse BER under narrowband filtering.
  • The OTSM, ODDM, OCDM, and AFDM variants can be served by the same receiver algorithms (linear, message-passing, memory AMP, and cross-domain iterative detectors) because all fit $y = Hx + w$ with structured channel matrices.
  • Detector complexity comparisons become meaningful on a common footing: for example, the paper's measurements show CD-MAMP provides BER close to OAMP at lower complexity.
  • The unified model gives a template for slotting future OTFS-related proposals into an existing analysis rather than treating each as a new modulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equivalence is taken at face value, several published claims of 'new waveform' gains are likely reparameterizations: the actual levers are pulse shape, transform choice, and detector, so a fair comparison should hold those fixed across variants.
  • A testable consequence is that one software-defined radio chain with switchable unitary transforms (DFT, Walsh-Hadamard, Fresnel, affine Fourier) could implement all the variants in the unified model, lowering deployment cost in high-mobility systems.
  • The circular-convolution assumption is the brittle edge: in very wideband channels with frequency-dependent Doppler (Doppler squint), the unified model will need the delay-scale-space extension the paper lists as an open direction, so the unification is strongest for narrowband doubly-selective channels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey/tutorial on OTFS and related waveforms. It presents OTFS as an ISFFT-precoded FBMC (Section II-C), shows that vector OFDM and OSDM are algebraically identical to rectangular-pulse OTFS (Sections III-A/B), describes OTSM and ODDM as related delay-domain schemes, and collects chirp-based OCDM and AFDM in an appendix. The paper then introduces a doubly-selective channel model with per-tap time-varying gains (Section V-A), expresses each modulation as y = Hx + w (Table IV), reviews linear, nonlinear, and deep-learning detectors under this model, and provides PSD, BER, and detector-comparison experiments. The central claim is that these variants share a common mathematical structure and can be studied and detected in a unified framework.

Significance. If the unification is taken as an expository claim, it is largely sound and useful. The matrix identities in Sections II-III are standard and correctly presented, and the paper provides a convenient reference for the relationships among OTFS, V-OFDM, OSDM, OTSM, ODDM, OCDM, and AFDM, with a useful complexity comparison in Table VI. I also checked the circular-convolution formulation in Eqs. (42)-(45): with a CP longer than the maximum delay spread, the modulo-MN indexing is exact even for time-varying channels, because the CP contains copies of the same tail samples; the time variation is captured in h[c,p]. The concern that wrap-around under Doppler invalidates the model therefore does not land, provided the stated CP condition holds. The main limitations are scope and presentation: the numerical comparisons do not include an OFDM baseline, and several comparative tables use qualitative entries without definitions; these do not invalidate the central unification.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV-B, Figs. 12-13] The BER experiments compare only OTFS-REC, OTFS-SRRC, and ODDM, while the abstract and introduction motivate these schemes by their advantage over OFDM; please either add an OFDM baseline or explicitly state that the comparison is among OTFS variants and that the advantage over OFDM is taken from the cited literature.
  2. [Table III] The qualitative ratings (e.g., 'Sensitive', 'Robust', 'Strong', 'Good', 'Bad') have no definitions or supporting references; since the table presents comparative performance claims, please add a legend, explicit criteria, and citations for each attribute.
  3. [Section III-D, Eqs. (32) and (35)] The continuous-time ODDM expression in Eq. (32) uses the phase e^{j2π nℓ/N}, while the correct expression in Eq. (35) contains the time-dependent phase e^{j2π n(t-mT/M)/(NT)}; please reconcile these two forms or explain that Eq. (32) is a simplified sampled form valid under the Nyquist pulse assumption.
  4. [Section VI-D and Table VI] The symbol N is used both for the number of temporal slots (M=64, N=16 in the experiment) and for the number of data symbols in Eq. (46), which makes the complexity entries ambiguous; for example, the LMMSE complexity O(N^3) should be stated in terms of the data-vector dimension, e.g., O((MN)^3) or equivalent.
  5. [Section V-A, Eqs. (42)-(45)] Before Eq. (42), the assumptions behind the modulo-MN indexing should be stated explicitly (CP length at least the maximum delay spread, no inter-block interference, and the receive filter response absorbed into h[c,p]); the current one-sentence justification may lead readers to believe the circular model itself is an approximation for Doppler channels.
  6. [Section II-B, Eq. (13)] The index expression 'Pi,m+nM' appears garbled, and the definition Ns = M(N+11) is unexplained; please correct the notation and define Ns in terms of the FBMC prototype filter length.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the OTFS-FBMC and V-OFDM/OSDM equivalences are algebraic identities from external sources, and the unified I/O model is a constructed representation rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are algebraic, not definitional. OTFS-as-precoded-FBMC follows by substituting the ISFFT definition (15) into the Heisenberg transform (16) and comparing term-by-term with the FBMC basis (8)-(9); no target result is baked into the premise. The V-OFDM/OSDM equivalences are direct matrix identities: Eq. (24) equals Eq. (19) with G=I, and Eqs. (26)-(27) equal Eqs. (18)/(22) with rectangular pulses, both resting on external primary sources (Xia, Ebihara, Lin, Hadani, Raviteja). The unified model y=Hx+omega in Eq. (46) is a construction: each H in Table IV is the product of the modulation's known transceiver matrices and the sampled channel matrix (43), with no parameter fitted to the quantities being 'predicted'. The detector survey cites the authors' own MAMP/CD-MAMP papers [87], [89], but these support descriptions of previously published algorithms, not the unification premise, and the BER comparisons in Fig. 20 are Monte Carlo evaluations under stated channel assumptions rather than fitted predictions. The Section V-A modulo-MN channel model (42)-(45) is an approximation for high-Doppler time-varying channels; that is a modeling limitation, not a circularity. Hence no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no invented physical entities. The central relationships rest on standard transform mathematics and on stated domain conventions: a finite-path delay-Doppler channel, a cyclic prefix longer than the delay spread, and rectangular pulses at Nyquist rate for the exact equivalence results. These are modeling conventions, not ad hoc additions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The sampled time-varying channel can be represented as a finite L-path sum of delta functions with scalar gains, delays, and Doppler shifts (Eq. 39).
    Used throughout Section V to derive the unified I/O model; excludes diffuse scattering, non-stationary channels, and frequency-dependent Doppler squint.
  • domain assumption The cyclic prefix length exceeds the maximum channel delay spread, making the channel matrix H_ch circular with modulo-MN indexing (Eqs. 42-45).
    Load-bearing for the circular convolution model and for every input-output expression in Table IV. If the CP is insufficient, the unified model changes.
  • domain assumption Rectangular transceiver pulses of duration T and Nyquist sampling rate T/M make OSDM and V-OFDM exactly equal to OTFS (Section III-A/B).
    This is the stated condition under which the claimed equivalence holds. The paper acknowledges that practical pulse shapes differ.
  • standard math Standard DFT/IDFT properties, the unitary WHT, DFnT, DAFT, and the Balian-Low theorem are accepted background results.
    Used implicitly in Sections II-III and the Appendix to justify the modulation and demodulation equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Unifying View of OTFS and Its Many Variants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7DUXQKGI

@misc{pith2026250209118,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Unifying View of OTFS and Its Many Variants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7DUXQKGI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09118}
}
read the original abstract

High mobility environment leads to severe Doppler effects and poses serious challenges to the conventional physical layer based on the widely popular orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). The recent emergence of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation, along with its many related variants, presents a promising solution to overcome such channel Doppler effects. This paper aims to clearly establish the relationships among the various manifestations of OTFS. Among these related modulations, we identify their connections, common features, and distinctions. Building on existing works, this work provides a general overview of various OTFS-related detection schemes and performance comparisons. We first provide an overview of OFDM and filter bank multi-carrier (FBMC) by demonstrating OTFS as a precoded FBMC through the introduction of inverse symplectic finite Fourier transform (ISFFT). We explore the relationship between OTFS and related modulation schemes with similar characteristics. We provide an effective channel model for high-mobility channels and offer a unified detection representation. We provide numerical comparisons of power spectrum density (PSD) and bit error rate (BER) to underscore the benefit of these modulation schemes in high-mobility scenarios. We also evaluate various detection schemes, revealing insights into their efficacies. We discuss opportunities and challenges for OTFS in high mobility, setting the stage for future research and development in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09118 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timeline of variants modulation schemes related to OTFS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Diagram of overall structure of this paper. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diagram of OFDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (18 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diagram of FBMC-OQAM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relationship between delay-Doppler (DD) grid and time-frequency (TF) grid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diagram of OTFS: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Diagram of V-OFDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagram of OSDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Diagram of OTSM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Diagram of ODDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: BER performance of selected modulation schemes at a user velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: BER performance of selected modulation schemes under varying user [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Block diagram of the linear detector. In this section, we review some existing OTFS receivers for practical OTFS related signal detection. Without loss of generality, we use the following linear model to represent the discrete I/O relationship of the various modulatio…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Block diagram of the decision feedback equalization detector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Factor graph example. dimensional Bayesian inference is intractable, thereby leading to approximate inference methods. Specifically, the posterior probability of each transmitted symbol is approximated by passing messages that marginalize over other symbols on the fac…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Block diagram of the memory/non-memory message passing detector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Example of time domain channel matrix. (a) Doubly-selective fading; (b) Time-selective fading; (c) Frequency-selective fading. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Block diagram of the cross domain iterative detector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: BER performance of different detectors in OTFS-SRRC system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Diagram of OCDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Diagram of AFDM: (a) modulation; (b) demodulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_22.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

177 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    OFDM inspired waveforms for 5G,

    B. Farhang-Boroujeny and H. Moradi, “OFDM inspired waveforms for 5G,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2474–2492, 4th Quart., 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    From 5G to beyond 5G: A comprehensive survey of wireless network evolution, challenges, and promising technologies,

    A. Sufyan, K. B. Khan, O. A. Khashan, T. Mir, and U. Mir, “From 5G to beyond 5G: A comprehensive survey of wireless network evolution, challenges, and promising technologies,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2200, May 2023

    2023

  3. [3]

    OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey,

    T. Hwang, C. Yang, G. Wu, S. Li, and G. Ye Li, “OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1673–1694, May 2009

    2009

  4. [4]

    Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications,

    G. Stuber, J. Barry, S. McLaughlin, Y . Li, M. Ingram, and T. Pratt, “Broadband MIMO-OFDM wireless communications,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 271–294, Feb. 2004

    2004

  5. [5]

    Modulation formats and waveforms for 5G networks: Who will be the heir of OFDM?: An overview of alternative modulation schemes for improved spectral efficiency,

    P. Banelli, S. Buzzi, G. Colavolpe, A. Modenini, F. Rusek, and A. Ugolini, “Modulation formats and waveforms for 5G networks: Who will be the heir of OFDM?: An overview of alternative modulation schemes for improved spectral efficiency,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 80–93, Nov. 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    Filter bank multicarrier modu- lation schemes for future mobile communications,

    R. Nissel, S. Schwarz, and M. Rupp, “Filter bank multicarrier modu- lation schemes for future mobile communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1768–1782, Aug. 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Filtered OFDM systems, algorithms, and performance analysis for 5G and beyond,

    L. Zhang, A. Ijaz, P. Xiao, M. M. Molu, and R. Tafazolli, “Filtered OFDM systems, algorithms, and performance analysis for 5G and beyond,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1205–1218, Mar. 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    GFDM - generalized frequency division multiplexing,

    G. Fettweis, M. Krondorf, and S. Bittner, “GFDM - generalized frequency division multiplexing,” in VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th V ehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, Apr. 2009, pp. 1–4

    2009

Show all 177 references
  1. [9]

    Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks,

    N. Michailow, N. Michailow, M. Matth ´e, I. S. Gaspar, A. N. Caldevilla, L. L. Mendes, A. Festag, and G. Fettweis, “Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 3045–3061, Sep. 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE,

    V . Vakilian, T. Wild, F. Schaich, S. ten Brink, and J.-F. Frigon, “Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE,” in 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) . IEEE, Dec. 2013, pp. 223–228

    2013

  3. [11]

    Multiple access and waveforms for 5G: IDMA and universal filtered multi-carrier,

    Y . Chen, F. Schaich, and T. Wild, “Multiple access and waveforms for 5G: IDMA and universal filtered multi-carrier,” in 2014 IEEE 79th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) . IEEE, May 2014, pp. 1–5

    2014

  4. [12]

    A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,

    J. Wu and P. Fan, “A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 450– 476, Jan. 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Key challenges, drivers and solutions for mobility management in 5G networks: A survey,

    I. Shayea, M. Ergen, M. Hadri Azmi, S. Aldirmaz Colak, R. Nordin, and Y . I. Daradkeh, “Key challenges, drivers and solutions for mobility management in 5G networks: A survey,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 172 534–172 552, Sep. 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    OTFS: A new generation of modulation addressing the challenges of 5G,

    R. Hadani and A. Monk, “OTFS: A new generation of modulation addressing the challenges of 5G,” Feb. 2018, arXiv:1802.02623. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02623

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    R. Hadani, S. Rakib, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, A. J. Goldsmith, A. F. Molisch, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, Mar. 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  8. [16]

    OTFS - orthogonal time frequency space,

    A. Monk, R. Hadani, M. Tsatsanis, and S. Rakib, “OTFS - orthogonal time frequency space,” Aug. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02993

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Effective diversity of OTFS modulation,

    P. Raviteja, Y . Hong, E. Viterbo, and E. Biglieri, “Effective diversity of OTFS modulation,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 249–253, Feb. 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,

    G. D. Surabhi, R. M. Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3049–3063, Jun. 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Linear precoding design for OTFS systems in time/frequency selective fading channels,

    Y . Ge, L. Meng, D. G. G., M. Wen, Y . L. Guan, and P. Fan, “Linear precoding design for OTFS systems in time/frequency selective fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    OTFS vs. OFDM in the pres- ence of sparsity: A fair comparison,

    L. Gaudio, G. Colavolpe, and G. Caire, “OTFS vs. OFDM in the pres- ence of sparsity: A fair comparison,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 4410–4423, Jun. 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Peak-to- average power ratio of OTFS modulation,

    G. D. Surabhi, R. M. Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “Peak-to- average power ratio of OTFS modulation,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 999–1002, Jun. 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Charactering the peak- to-average power ratio of OTFS signals: A large system analysis,

    P. Wei, Y . Xiao, W. Feng, N. Ge, and M. Xiao, “Charactering the peak- to-average power ratio of OTFS signals: A large system analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 3705–3720, Jun. 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel esti- mation,

    M. Kollengode Ramachandran and A. Chockalingam, “MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel esti- mation,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBE- COM). IEEE, Dec. 2018, pp. 206–212

    2018

  16. [24]

    Interference cancellation and iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    P. Raviteja, K. T. Phan, Y . Hong, and E. Viterbo, “Interference cancellation and iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 6501– 6515, Oct. 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay–Doppler channels,

    P. Raviteja, K. T. Phan, and Y . Hong, “Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay–Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 4906–4917, May 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    OTFS based random access preamble transmission for high mobility scenarios,

    A. K. Sinha, S. K. Mohammed, P. Raviteja, Y . Hong, and E. Viterbo, “OTFS based random access preamble transmission for high mobility scenarios,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 15 078– 15 094, Dec. 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    On OTFS modulation for high- Doppler fading channels,

    K. R. Murali and A. Chockalingam, “On OTFS modulation for high- Doppler fading channels,” in 2018 Information Theory and Applica- tions Workshop (ITA) . IEEE, Feb. 2018, pp. 1–10

    2018

  20. [28]

    Low complexity iterative LMMSE-PIC equalizer for OTFS,

    F. Long, K. Niu, C. Dong, and J. Lin, “Low complexity iterative LMMSE-PIC equalizer for OTFS,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , May 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  21. [29]

    An overview of OTFS for internet of things: Concepts, benefits, and challenges,

    L. Xiao, S. Li, Y . Qian, D. Chen, and T. Jiang, “An overview of OTFS for internet of things: Concepts, benefits, and challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 7596–7618, May 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Performance analysis of coded OTFS systems over high-mobility channels,

    S. Li, J. Yuan, W. Yuan, Z. Wei, B. Bai, and D. W. K. Ng, “Performance analysis of coded OTFS systems over high-mobility channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 6033–6048, Sep. 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Receiver design for OTFS with a fractionally spaced sampling approach,

    Y . Ge, Q. Deng, P. C. Ching, and Z. Ding, “Receiver design for OTFS with a fractionally spaced sampling approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 4072–4086, Jul. 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Uplink-aided high mobility downlink channel estimation over massive MIMO-OTFS system,

    Y . Liu, S. Zhang, F. Gao, J. Ma, and X. Wang, “Uplink-aided high mobility downlink channel estimation over massive MIMO-OTFS system,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1994–2009, Sep. 2020

    1994

  25. [33]

    A new path division multiple access for the massive MIMO-OTFS networks,

    M. Li, S. Zhang, F. Gao, P. Fan, and O. A. Dobre, “A new path division multiple access for the massive MIMO-OTFS networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 903–918, Apr. 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Low complexity precoding and detection in multi-user massive MIMO OTFS downlink,

    B. C. Pandey, S. K. Mohammed, P. Raviteja, Y . Hong, and E. Viterbo, “Low complexity precoding and detection in multi-user massive MIMO OTFS downlink,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 4389– 4405, May 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Block- wise index modulation and receiver design for high-mobility OTFS communications,

    M. Qian, F. Ji, Y . Ge, M. Wen, X. Cheng, and H. V . Poor, “Block- wise index modulation and receiver design for high-mobility OTFS communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 5726– 5739, Oct. 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Underwater acoustic communication with an orthogonal signal division multiplexing scheme in doubly spread channels,

    T. Ebihara and K. Mizutani, “Underwater acoustic communication with an orthogonal signal division multiplexing scheme in doubly spread channels,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 47–58, Jan. 2014. 23

    2014

  29. [37]

    Doppler-resilient orthogonal signal-division multiplexing for underwater acoustic communication,

    T. Ebihara and G. Leus, “Doppler-resilient orthogonal signal-division multiplexing for underwater acoustic communication,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 408–427, Apr. 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Low-complexity equal- ization of orthogonal signal-division multiplexing in doubly-selective channels,

    J. Han, L. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and G. Leus, “Low-complexity equal- ization of orthogonal signal-division multiplexing in doubly-selective channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 915–929, Feb. 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Precoded and vector OFDM robust to channel spectral nulls and with reduced cyclic prefix length in single transmit antenna systems,

    X.-g. Xia, “Precoded and vector OFDM robust to channel spectral nulls and with reduced cyclic prefix length in single transmit antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1363–1374, Aug. 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Orthogonal time sequency mul- tiplexing modulation: Analysis and low-complexity receiver design,

    T. Thaj, E. Viterbo, and Y . Hong, “Orthogonal time sequency mul- tiplexing modulation: Analysis and low-complexity receiver design,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 7842–7855, Dec. 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Orthogonal delay-Doppler division multiplexing modulation,

    H. Lin and J. Yuan, “Orthogonal delay-Doppler division multiplexing modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 11 024–11 037, Dec. 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,

    X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3946–3957, Sep. 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    AFDM: A full diversity next generation waveform for high mobility communications,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “AFDM: A full diversity next generation waveform for high mobility communications,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, Jun. 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  36. [44]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,

    ——, “Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8214–8229, Nov. 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A promising next-generation waveform,

    Z. Wei, W. Yuan, S. Li, J. Yuan, G. Bharatula, R. Hadani, and L. Hanzo, “Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A promising next-generation waveform,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 136–144, Aug. 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    New delay Doppler communication paradigm in 6G era: A survey of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS),

    W. Yuan, S. Li, Z. Wei, Y . Cui, J. Jiang, H. Zhang, and P. Fan, “New delay Doppler communication paradigm in 6G era: A survey of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS),” China Commun. , vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1–25, Jun. 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Y . Hong, T. Thaj, and E. Viterbo, Delay-Doppler Communications: Principles and Applications . Academic Press, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Toward 6G multicell orthogonal time frequency space systems: Interference coordination and cooperative communications,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Wu, X. Lei, L. Lei, and Z. Wei, “Toward 6G multicell orthogonal time frequency space systems: Interference coordination and cooperative communications,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–64, Mar. 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe Doppler effects,

    J. Shi, Z. Li, J. Hu, Z. Tie, S. Li, W. Liang, and Z. Ding, “OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe Doppler effects,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 203–209, Jan. 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    A survey on orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    M. Aldababsa, S. ¨Ozyurt, G. K. Kurt, and O. Kucur, “A survey on orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 4483–4518, Jul. 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Modulation and multiple access for 5G networks,

    Y . Cai, Z. Qin, F. Cui, G. Y . Li, and J. A. McCann, “Modulation and multiple access for 5G networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 629–646, First Quart. 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Orthogonal time frequency space for integrated sensing and communication: A survey,

    E. Shtaiwi, A. Abdelhadi, H. Li, Z. Han, and H. V . Poor, “Orthogonal time frequency space for integrated sensing and communication: A survey,” Feb. 2024, arXiv:2402.09637. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09637

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Multi-carrier modulation: An evolution from time-frequency domain to delay- Doppler domain,

    H. Lin, J. Yuan, W. Yu, J. Wu, and L. Hanzo, “Multi-carrier modulation: An evolution from time-frequency domain to delay- Doppler domain,” Aug. 2023, arXiv:2308.01802. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01802

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Overview and performance analysis of various waveforms in high mobility scenarios,

    Y . Zhou, H. Yin, J. Xiong, S. Song, J. Zhu, J. Du, H. Chen, and Y . Tang, “Overview and performance analysis of various waveforms in high mobility scenarios,” in 2024 7th International Conference on Communication Engineering and Technology (ICCET) . IEEE, Feb. 2024, pp. 35–40

    2024

  47. [55]

    On pilot-symbol aided channel estimation in FBMC-OQAM,

    R. Nissel and M. Rupp, “On pilot-symbol aided channel estimation in FBMC-OQAM,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP). IEEE, Mar. 2016, pp. 3681–3685

    2016

  48. [56]

    A time-frequency well-localized pulse for multiple carrier transmission,

    R. Haas and J.-C. Belfiore, “A time-frequency well-localized pulse for multiple carrier transmission,” Wireless personal communications , vol. 5, pp. 1–18, Jul. 1997

    1997

  49. [57]

    H. G. Feichtinger and T. Strohmer, Gabor analysis and algorithms: Theory and applications . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  50. [58]

    Practical pulse- shaping waveforms for reduced-cyclic-prefix OTFS,

    P. Raviteja, Y . Hong, E. Viterbo, and E. Biglieri, “Practical pulse- shaping waveforms for reduced-cyclic-prefix OTFS,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 957–961, Jan. 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    On performance of vector OFDM with linear receivers,

    Y . Li, I. Ngebani, X.-G. Xia, and A. Host-Madsen, “On performance of vector OFDM with linear receivers,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 5268–5280, Oct. 2012

    2012

  52. [60]

    On orthogonal AMP in coded linear vector systems,

    J. Ma, L. Liu, X. Yuan, and L. Ping, “On orthogonal AMP in coded linear vector systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 5658–5672, Dec. 2019

    2019

  53. [61]

    S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: Estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993

    1993

  54. [62]

    Low complexity LMMSE receiver for OTFS,

    S. Tiwari, S. S. Das, and V . Rangamgari, “Low complexity LMMSE receiver for OTFS,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2205– 2209, Dec. 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    Low-complexity LMMSE re- ceiver design for practical-pulse-shaped MIMO-OTFS systems,

    P. Singh, S. Tiwari, and R. Budhiraja, “Low-complexity LMMSE re- ceiver design for practical-pulse-shaped MIMO-OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 8383–8399, Dec. 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    A complexity-reduced QRD-SIC detector for interleaved OTFS,

    H. Shao, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, J. Wang, N. Wang, and A. Nallanathan, “A complexity-reduced QRD-SIC detector for interleaved OTFS,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 950–960, Feb. 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Low complexity MMSE-SIC receiver for OTFS in high-speed mobile scenarios,

    Z. Wang, Z. Liu, F. Xing, R. Sun, and X. Ning, “Low complexity MMSE-SIC receiver for OTFS in high-speed mobile scenarios,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 667–671, Mar. 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    Low-complexity symbol detection and interference cancellation for OTFS system,

    H. Qu, G. Liu, L. Zhang, S. Wen, and M. A. Imran, “Low-complexity symbol detection and interference cancellation for OTFS system,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1524–1537, Mar. 2021

    2021

  59. [67]

    Efficient channel equalization and symbol detection for MIMO OTFS systems,

    H. Qu, G. Liu, M. A. Imran, S. Wen, and L. Zhang, “Efficient channel equalization and symbol detection for MIMO OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 6672–6686, Aug. 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    The finite-length multi-input multi-output MMSE-DFE,

    N. Al-Dhahir and A. Sayed, “The finite-length multi-input multi-output MMSE-DFE,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2921– 2936, Oct. 2000

    2000

  61. [69]

    Low complexity iterative rake decision feedback equalizer for zero-padded OTFS systems,

    T. Thaj and E. Viterbo, “Low complexity iterative rake decision feedback equalizer for zero-padded OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 15 606–15 622, Dec. 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Soft-input soft-output block decision feedback equalization for ISI channels,

    C. Yin, W. Feng, J. Li, X. Bao, and G. Li, “Soft-input soft-output block decision feedback equalization for ISI channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 6213–6224, Sep. 2021

    2021

  63. [71]

    Low complexity soft-input soft-output block decision feedback equalization,

    J. Wu and Y . R. Zheng, “Low complexity soft-input soft-output block decision feedback equalization,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 281–289, Feb. 2008

    2008

  64. [72]

    Soft-decision feedback turbo equalization for multilevel modulations,

    H. Lou and C. Xiao, “Soft-decision feedback turbo equalization for multilevel modulations,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 186–195, Jan. 2011

    2011

  65. [73]

    Successive interference cancellation aided bidirectional soft decision feedback equalization for OTFS systems,

    Z. Ye, S. Yan, Z. Sui, H. Zhang, and S. Sun, “Successive interference cancellation aided bidirectional soft decision feedback equalization for OTFS systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2028–2032, Dec. 2023

    2023

  66. [74]

    Message feedback interference cancellation aided UAMP iterative detector for OTFS systems,

    X. Li, H. Wang, Y . Ge, X. Shen, and J. Zhao, “Message feedback interference cancellation aided UAMP iterative detector for OTFS systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 924–928, Apr. 2024

    2024

  67. [75]

    OTFS signaling for uplink NOMA of heterogeneous mobility users,

    Y . Ge, Q. Deng, P. C. Ching, and Z. Ding, “OTFS signaling for uplink NOMA of heterogeneous mobility users,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3147–3161, May 2021

    2021

  68. [76]

    Vector approximate message passing,

    S. Rangan, P. Schniter, and A. K. Fletcher, “Vector approximate message passing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 6664– 6684, Oct. 2019

    2019

  69. [77]

    Gaussian approximate message passing detection of orthogonal time frequency space modu- lation,

    L. Xiang, Y . Liu, L.-L. Yang, and L. Hanzo, “Gaussian approximate message passing detection of orthogonal time frequency space modu- lation,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 10 999–11 004, Oct. 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Orthogonal time frequency space detection via low-complexity expectation propagation,

    Y . Shan, F. Wang, and Y . Hao, “Orthogonal time frequency space detection via low-complexity expectation propagation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 10 887–10 901, Dec. 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    OTFS signaling for SCMA with coordinated multi-point vehicle communications,

    Y . Ge, Q. Deng, D. G. G., Y . L. Guan, and Z. Ding, “OTFS signaling for SCMA with coordinated multi-point vehicle communications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 9044–9057, Jul. 2023

    2023

  72. [80]

    A new insight into GAMP and AMP,

    L. Liu, Y . Li, C. Huang, C. Yuen, and Y . L. Guan, “A new insight into GAMP and AMP,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 8264–8269, Aug. 2019

    2019

  73. [81]

    The dynamics of message passing on dense graphs, with applications to compressed sensing,

    M. Bayati and A. Montanari, “The dynamics of message passing on dense graphs, with applications to compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 764–785, Feb. 2011

    2011

  74. [82]

    Message-passing algo- rithms for compressed sensing,

    D. L. Donoho, A. Maleki, and A. Montanari, “Message-passing algo- rithms for compressed sensing,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , vol. 106, no. 45, pp. 18 914–18 919, Jul. 2009

    2009

  75. [83]

    Iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation with uni- tary approximate message passing,

    Z. Yuan, F. Liu, W. Yuan, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, and J. Yuan, “Iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation with uni- tary approximate message passing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 714–725, Feb. 2022. 24

    2022

  76. [84]

    Unitary approximate message passing for sparse Bayesian learning,

    M. Luo, Q. Guo, M. Jin, Y . C. Eldar, D. Huang, and X. Meng, “Unitary approximate message passing for sparse Bayesian learning,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 69, pp. 6023–6039, Sep. 2021

    2021

  77. [85]

    Memory AMP,

    L. Liu, S. Huang, and B. M. Kurkoski, “Memory AMP,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 8015–8039, Dec. 2022

    2022

  78. [86]

    Bayes-optimal convolutional AMP,

    K. Takeuchi, “Bayes-optimal convolutional AMP,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 4405–4428, Jul. 2021

    2021

  79. [87]

    Low- complexity memory AMP detector for high-mobility MIMO-OTFS SCMA systems,

    Y . Ge, L. Liu, S. Huang, D. G. G., Y . L. Guan, and Z. Ding, “Low- complexity memory AMP detector for high-mobility MIMO-OTFS SCMA systems,” in Proc. IEEE ICC Workshop OTFS-DDMC-6G, . IEEE, May 2023, pp. 807–812

    2023

  80. [88]

    Cross domain iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    S. Li, W. Yuan, Z. Wei, and J. Yuan, “Cross domain iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2227–2242, Apr. 2022

    2022

  81. [89]

    Interleave fre- quency division multiplexing,

    Y . Chi, L. Liu, Y . Ge, X. Chen, Y . Li, and Z. Zhang, “Interleave fre- quency division multiplexing,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1963–1967, Jul. 2024

    1963

  82. [90]

    Learning to equalize OTFS,

    Z. Zhou, L. Liu, J. Xu, and R. Calderbank, “Learning to equalize OTFS,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7723–7736, Sep. 2022

    2022

  83. [91]

    Two-dimensional convolutional neural network-based signal detection for OTFS systems,

    Y . K. Enku, B. Bai, F. Wan, C. U. Guyo, I. N. Tiba, C. Zhang, and S. Li, “Two-dimensional convolutional neural network-based signal detection for OTFS systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2514–2518, Nov. 2021

    2021

  84. [92]

    Data-driven intelligent receiver for OTFS communication in internet of vehicles,

    B. Wang, Z. Yuan, S. Zheng, and Y . Liu, “Data-driven intelligent receiver for OTFS communication in internet of vehicles,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 6968–6979, May 2024

    2024

  85. [93]

    DL-based OTFS signal detection in presence of hardware impairments,

    A. Singh, S. Sharma, K. Deka, and V . Bhatia, “DL-based OTFS signal detection in presence of hardware impairments,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1533–1537, Sep. 2023

    2023

  86. [94]

    Expectation propagation aided model driven learning for OTFS signal detection,

    S. Li, C. Ding, L. Xiao, X. Zhang, G. Liu, and T. Jiang, “Expectation propagation aided model driven learning for OTFS signal detection,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 12 407–12 412, Sep. 2023

    2023

  87. [95]

    Gaussian AMP aided model-driven learning for OTFS system,

    X. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Li, Q. Yuan, L. Xiang, and T. Jiang, “Gaussian AMP aided model-driven learning for OTFS system,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2949–2953, Dec. 2022

    2022

  88. [96]

    Graph neural network assisted efficient signal detection for OTFS systems,

    X. Zhang, S. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Li, and T. Jiang, “Graph neural network assisted efficient signal detection for OTFS systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2058–2062, Aug. 2023

    2023

  89. [97]

    Bayesian neural network detector for an orthogonal time frequency space modu- lation,

    A. Kosasih, X. Qu, W. Hardjawana, C. Yue, and B. Vucetic, “Bayesian neural network detector for an orthogonal time frequency space modu- lation,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2570–2574, Dec. 2022

    2022

  90. [98]

    Approximate message passing-enhanced graph neural network for OTFS data detection,

    W. Zhuang, Y . Mao, H. He, L. Xie, S. Song, Y . Ge, and Z. Ding, “Approximate message passing-enhanced graph neural network for OTFS data detection,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1913–1917, Jul. 2024

    1913

  91. [99]

    Autoencoder-based enhanced orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    Y . I. Tek, A. T. Dogukan, and E. Basar, “Autoencoder-based enhanced orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2628–2632, Oct. 2023

    2023

  92. [100]

    A novel environmentally robust ODDM detection approach using contrastive learning,

    Q. Cheng, Z. Shi, J. Yuan, P. G. Fitzpatrick, and T. Sakurai, “A novel environmentally robust ODDM detection approach using contrastive learning,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 5274–5286, Sep. 2023

    2023

  93. [101]

    Flag sequence set de- sign for low-complexity delay-Doppler estimation,

    L. Meng, Y . L. Guan, Y . Ge, and Z. Liu, “Flag sequence set de- sign for low-complexity delay-Doppler estimation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10457, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  94. [102]

    OTFS channel estimation and data detection designs with superimposed pilots,

    H. B. Mishra, P. Singh, A. K. Prasad, and R. Budhiraja, “OTFS channel estimation and data detection designs with superimposed pilots,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2258–2274, Apr. 2022

    2022

  95. [103]

    Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,

    W. Shen, L. Dai, J. An, P. Fan, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 67, no. 16, pp. 4204–4217, Aug. 2019

    2019

  96. [104]

    Low complexity joint channel estimation and data detection for AFDM receivers with oversampling,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe, Y . Ge, G. T. F. de Abreu, and Y . L. Guan, “Low complexity joint channel estimation and data detection for AFDM receivers with oversampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05088 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for downlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional Doppler,

    D. Shi et al. , “Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for downlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional Doppler,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 7151– 7165, Nov. 2021

    2021

  98. [106]

    Message passing-based structured sparse signal recovery for estimation of OTFS channels with fractional Doppler shifts,

    F. Liu, Z. Yuan, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, and P. Sun, “Message passing-based structured sparse signal recovery for estimation of OTFS channels with fractional Doppler shifts,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 7773–7785, Dec. 2021

    2021

  99. [107]

    Lte; evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); base station (BS) radio transmission and reception,

    “Lte; evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); base station (BS) radio transmission and reception,” European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Tech. Rep. 3GPP TS 36.104 version 8.6.0 Release 8, 7 2009, eTSI TS

    2009

  100. [108]

    Off-grid channel estimation with sparse Bayesian learning for OTFS systems,

    Z. Wei, W. Yuan, S. Li, J. Yuan, and D. W. K. Ng, “Off-grid channel estimation with sparse Bayesian learning for OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7407–7426, Sep. 2022

    2022

  101. [109]

    Off-grid channel estimation using grid evolution for OTFS systems,

    Y . Shan, F. Wang, Y . Hao, J. Yuan, J. Hua, and Y . Xin, “Off-grid channel estimation using grid evolution for OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9549–9565, Aug. 2024

    2024

  102. [110]

    Sparse Bayesian learning approach for OTFS channel estimation with frac- tional Doppler,

    Y . Zhang, Q. Zhang, C. He, L. Jing, T. Zheng, and C. Yuen, “Sparse Bayesian learning approach for OTFS channel estimation with frac- tional Doppler,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 16 846– 16 860, Nov. 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    2D off-grid decomposition and SBL combination for OTFS channel estimation,

    Q. Wang, Y . Liang, Z. Zhang, and P. Fan, “2D off-grid decomposition and SBL combination for OTFS channel estimation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3084–3098, May 2023

    2023

  104. [112]

    Joint detection and channel estimation for MIMO-OTFS systems,

    C. Shi, L. Zhao, Y . Cui, Y . Chu, W. Guo, and W. Wang, “Joint detection and channel estimation for MIMO-OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 11 568–11 579, Aug. 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Joint Bayesian channel estimation and data detection for OTFS systems in LEO satellite communications,

    X. Wang, W. Shen, C. Xing, J. An, and L. Hanzo, “Joint Bayesian channel estimation and data detection for OTFS systems in LEO satellite communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 4386–4399, Jul. 2022

    2022

  106. [114]

    Two-dimensional delay- Doppler pilots and channel estimation for multi-antenna OTFS in doubly dispersive channels,

    Y . Liang, P. Fan, Q. Wang, and X. He, “Two-dimensional delay- Doppler pilots and channel estimation for multi-antenna OTFS in doubly dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7612–7623, Jul. 2024

    2024

  107. [115]

    Bayesian learning aided simultaneous row and group sparse channel estimation in orthogonal time frequency space modulated MIMO systems,

    S. Srivastava, R. K. Singh, A. K. Jagannatham, and L. Hanzo, “Bayesian learning aided simultaneous row and group sparse channel estimation in orthogonal time frequency space modulated MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 635–648, Jan. 2022

    2022

  108. [116]

    Time do- main channel estimation and equalization of CP-OTFS under multiple fractional Dopplers and residual synchronization errors,

    S. S. Das, V . Rangamgari, S. Tiwari, and S. C. Mondal, “Time do- main channel estimation and equalization of CP-OTFS under multiple fractional Dopplers and residual synchronization errors,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 10 561–10 576, Jan. 2021

    2021

  109. [117]

    Downlink synchronization for OTFS-based cellular systems in high Doppler environments,

    M. S. Khan, Y . J. Kim, Q. Sultan, J. Joung, and Y . S. Cho, “Downlink synchronization for OTFS-based cellular systems in high Doppler environments,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 73 575–73 589, May 2021

    2021

  110. [118]

    Initial time synchronization for OTFS,

    C.-D. Chung, M.-Z. Xu, and W.-C. Chen, “Initial time synchronization for OTFS,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 18 769– 18 786, Dec 2024

    2024

  111. [119]

    Time and frequency synchronization for OTFS,

    M. Bayat and A. Farhang, “Time and frequency synchronization for OTFS,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2670–2674, Dec. 2022

    2022

  112. [120]

    Primary synchronization signal design and low-complexity detection for OTFS cellular systems,

    M. S. Khan and A. K. Reddy Chavva, “Primary synchronization signal design and low-complexity detection for OTFS cellular systems,” in GLOBECOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference . IEEE, Dec. 2023, pp. 4122–4127

    2023

  113. [121]

    Practical synchronization for OTFS,

    M. Bayat, S. P.S., and A. Farhang, “Practical synchronization for OTFS,” in ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Commu- nications. IEEE, May 2023, pp. 735–740

    2023

  114. [122]

    Synchronization for multiuser uplink OTFS,

    M. Bayat, S. P. S., and A. Farhang, “Synchronization for multiuser uplink OTFS,” Oct. 2024, arXiv:2410.10740. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10740

    2024 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Downlink carrier frequency offset estimation for OTFS-based LEO satellite communication system,

    S. Li, M. Zhang, C. Ju, D. Wang, W. Chen, P. Zhou, and D. Wang, “Downlink carrier frequency offset estimation for OTFS-based LEO satellite communication system,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 163–167, Jan. 2024

    2024

  116. [124]

    Pilot-aided joint time synchronization and channel estimation for OTFS,

    J. Sun, P. Yang, X. Cao, Z. Xiong, H. Zhang, Y . Gao, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Pilot-aided joint time synchronization and channel estimation for OTFS,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , pp. 1–1, Nov. 2024

    2024

  117. [125]

    Distributed antenna systems for mobile communications in high speed trains,

    J. Wang, H. Zhu, and N. J. Gomes, “Distributed antenna systems for mobile communications in high speed trains,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 675–683, May 2012

    2012

  118. [126]

    Cell-free massive MIMO meets OTFS modulation,

    M. Mohammadi, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, “Cell-free massive MIMO meets OTFS modulation,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 7728–7747, Nov. 2022

    2022

  119. [127]

    OTFS-NOMA: An efficient approach for exploiting heterogenous user mobility profiles,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, P. Fan, and H. Vincent Poor, “OTFS-NOMA: An efficient approach for exploiting heterogenous user mobility profiles,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 7950–7965, Nov. 2019

    2019

  120. [128]

    OTFS-SCMA: A downlink NOMA scheme for massive connectivity in high mobility channels,

    H. Wen, W. Yuan, Z. Liu, and S. Li, “OTFS-SCMA: A downlink NOMA scheme for massive connectivity in high mobility channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 5770–5784, Sep. 2023. 25

    2023

  121. [129]

    OTFS-SCMA: A code-domain NOMA approach for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    K. Deka, A. Thomas, and S. Sharma, “OTFS-SCMA: A code-domain NOMA approach for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 5043–5058, Aug. 2021

    2021

  122. [130]

    Cross-domain transmission scheme for uplink OTFS-RSMA based on heterogeneous mobile user grouping,

    Q. Huai, W. Yuan, Y . Wu, and P. Fan, “Cross-domain transmission scheme for uplink OTFS-RSMA based on heterogeneous mobile user grouping,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1181–1185, May 2024

    2024

  123. [131]

    Power allocation for high mobility OTFS-RSMA system with path-selective one-tap receiver,

    J. Liu, Y . L. Guan, Y . Ge, and B. Clerckx, “Power allocation for high mobility OTFS-RSMA system with path-selective one-tap receiver,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  124. [132]

    Grant-free random access in machine-type communication: Approaches and challenges,

    J. Choi, J. Ding, N.-P. Le, and Z. Ding, “Grant-free random access in machine-type communication: Approaches and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 151–158, Feb. 2022

    2022

  125. [133]

    Random access with massive MIMO-OTFS in LEO satellite communications,

    B. Shen, Y . Wu, J. An, C. Xing, L. Zhao, and W. Zhang, “Random access with massive MIMO-OTFS in LEO satellite communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2865–2881, Oct. 2022

    2022

  126. [134]

    Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite internet- of-things,

    X. Zhou, K. Ying, Z. Gao, Y . Wu, Z. Xiao, S. Chatzinotas, J. Yuan, and B. Ottersten, “Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite internet- of-things,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 28...

    2023

  127. [135]

    Grant-free NOMA-OTFS paradigm: Enabling efficient ubiquitous access for LEO satellite internet-of- things,

    Z. Gao, X. Zhou, J. Zhao, J. Li, C. Zhu, C. Hu, P. Xiao, S. Chatzinotas, D. W. K. Ng, and B. Ottersten, “Grant-free NOMA-OTFS paradigm: Enabling efficient ubiquitous access for LEO satellite internet-of- things,” IEEE Network , vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 18–26, Jan. 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    OTFS-TSMA for massive internet of things in high-speed railway,

    Y . Ma, G. Ma, N. Wang, Z. Zhong, and B. Ai, “OTFS-TSMA for massive internet of things in high-speed railway,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 519–531, Jan. 2022

    2022

  129. [137]

    OTFCS- modulated waveform design for joint grant-free random access and positioning in C-V2X,

    Y . Ma, G. Ma, B. Ai, J. Liu, N. Wang, and Z. Zhong, “OTFCS- modulated waveform design for joint grant-free random access and positioning in C-V2X,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 103–119, Jan. 2024

    2024

  130. [138]

    Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems: A survey and taxonomy,

    Y . Rahmatallah and S. Mohan, “Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems: A survey and taxonomy,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1567–1592, 4th Quart. 2013

    2013

  131. [139]

    Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in pilot- embedded OTFS modulation through iterative clipping and filtering,

    S. Gao and J. Zheng, “Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in pilot- embedded OTFS modulation through iterative clipping and filtering,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2055–2059, Sep. 2020

    2020

  132. [140]

    Diversity and PAPR enhancement in OTFS using indexing,

    J. K. Francis, R. Mary Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “Diversity and PAPR enhancement in OTFS using indexing,” in 2021 IEEE 93rd V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring) . IEEE, Apr. 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  133. [141]

    Autoencoder based PAPR reduction for OTFS modulation,

    M. Liu, M.-M. Zhao, M. Lei, and M.-J. Zhao, “Autoencoder based PAPR reduction for OTFS modulation,” in 2021 IEEE 94th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall). IEEE, Sep. 2021, pp. 1–5

    2021

  134. [142]

    Exploiting OTFS frame structure for PAPR reduction,

    A. S. S ¨umer, T. Yılmaz, E. Memis ¸o ˘glu, and H. Arslan, “Exploiting OTFS frame structure for PAPR reduction,” in 2022 IEEE 96th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall). IEEE, Sep. 2022, pp. 1–5

    2022

  135. [143]

    Re- ducing the PAPR of OTFS modulation using hybrid PAPR algorithms,

    A. Kumar, N. Gaur, S. Chakravarty, and A. Nanthaamornphong, “Re- ducing the PAPR of OTFS modulation using hybrid PAPR algorithms,” Wireless Pers. Commun. , vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 2503–2523, Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-10885-y

    2023 doi

  136. [144]

    Low PAPR channel estimation for OTFS with scattered superimposed pilots,

    W. Liu, L. Zou, B. Bai, and T. Sun, “Low PAPR channel estimation for OTFS with scattered superimposed pilots,” China Commun. , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79–87, Jan. 2023

    2023

  137. [145]

    Iterative channel estimation for OTFS systems based on low-PAPR hybrid superimposed pilots,

    M. Zhou, F. Chen, H. Yu, and J. Lu, “Iterative channel estimation for OTFS systems based on low-PAPR hybrid superimposed pilots,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1939–1943, Aug. 2024

    1939

  138. [146]

    Peak-to-average power ratio reduction via symbol precoding in OTFS modulation,

    J. Su, S. Liu, Y . Huang, and J. Yuan, “Peak-to-average power ratio reduction via symbol precoding in OTFS modulation,” in 2022 IEEE 95th V ehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring). IEEE, Jun. 2022, pp. 1–5

    2022

  139. [147]

    PAPR reduction precoding for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    Y . I. Tek and E. Basar, “PAPR reduction precoding for orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” in 2023 46th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP). IEEE, Jul. 2023, pp. 172–176

    2023

  140. [148]

    An expanded precoding scheme for PAPR reduction in OTFS modulation,

    J. Xiong, J. Zhu, J. Du, Y . Zhou, C. Yi, and Y . Tang, “An expanded precoding scheme for PAPR reduction in OTFS modulation,” in 2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) . IEEE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  141. [149]

    PAPR reduction with pre-chirp selection for affine frequency division multiplexing,

    H. Yuan, Y . Xu, X. Guo, Y . Ge, T. Ma, H. Li, D. He, and W. Zhang, “PAPR reduction with pre-chirp selection for affine frequency division multiplexing,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  142. [150]

    DAFT-spread affine frequency division multiple access for downlink transmission,

    Y . Tao, M. Wen, Y . Ge, T. Mao, L. Xiao, and J. Li, “DAFT-spread affine frequency division multiple access for downlink transmission,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03119 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  143. [151]

    On the Doppler squint effect in OTFS systems over doubly-dispersive channels: Modeling and evaluation,

    X. Wang, X. Shi, J. Wang, and J. Song, “On the Doppler squint effect in OTFS systems over doubly-dispersive channels: Modeling and evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8781– 8796, Dec. 2023

    2023

  144. [152]

    Orthogonal delay scale space modulation: A new technique for wideband time-varying channels,

    A. K. P. and C. R. Murthy, “Orthogonal delay scale space modulation: A new technique for wideband time-varying channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 2625–2638, 2022

    2022

  145. [153]

    On the effectiveness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and com- munication,

    L. Gaudio, M. Kobayashi, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “On the effectiveness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and com- munication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5951– 5965, Sep. 2020

    2020

  146. [154]

    Integrated sensing and communication-assisted orthogonal time frequency space transmission for vehicular networks,

    W. Yuan, Z. Wei, S. Li, J. Yuan, and D. W. K. Ng, “Integrated sensing and communication-assisted orthogonal time frequency space transmission for vehicular networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1515–1528, Nov. 2021

    2021

  147. [155]

    A novel ISAC transmission framework based on spatially-spread orthogonal time frequency space modulation,

    S. Li, W. Yuan, C. Liu, Z. Wei, J. Yuan, B. Bai, and D. W. K. Ng, “A novel ISAC transmission framework based on spatially-spread orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1854–1872, Jun. 2022

    2022

  148. [156]

    OTFS-based joint communication and sensing for future industrial IoT,

    K. Wu, J. A. Zhang, X. Huang, and Y . J. Guo, “OTFS-based joint communication and sensing for future industrial IoT,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1973–1989, Feb. 2023

    1973

  149. [157]

    Integrated sensing and communications with MIMO- OTFS: ISI/ICI exploitation and delay-Doppler multiplexing,

    M. F. Keskin, C. Marcus, O. Eriksson, A. Alvarado, J. Widmer, and H. Wymeersch, “Integrated sensing and communications with MIMO- OTFS: ISI/ICI exploitation and delay-Doppler multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 229–10 246, Aug. 2024

    2024

  150. [158]

    STAR-RIS aided integrated sensing and communication over high mobility scenario,

    M. Li, S. Zhang, Y . Ge, Z. Li, F. Gao, and P. Fan, “STAR-RIS aided integrated sensing and communication over high mobility scenario,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 4788–4802, Aug. 2024

    2024

  151. [159]

    Jamming suppression via resource hop- ping in high-mobility OTFS-SCMA systems,

    Q. Deng, Y . Ge, and Z. Ding, “Jamming suppression via resource hop- ping in high-mobility OTFS-SCMA systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2138–2142, Dec. 2023

    2023

  152. [160]

    OTFS based receiver scheme with multi-antennas in high-mobility V2X systems,

    J. Cheng, C. Jia, H. Gao, W. Xu, and Z. Bie, “OTFS based receiver scheme with multi-antennas in high-mobility V2X systems,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops). IEEE, Jun. 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  153. [161]

    Trajectory planning for OTFS-based UA V communications,

    R. Han, J. Ma, and L. Bai, “Trajectory planning for OTFS-based UA V communications,” China Commun. , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 114–124, Jan. 2023

    2023

  154. [162]

    Outage probability for OTFS based downlink LEO satellite communication,

    J. Shi, J. Hu, Y . Yue, X. Xue, W. Liang, and Z. Li, “Outage probability for OTFS based downlink LEO satellite communication,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 3355–3360, Mar. 2022

    2022

  155. [163]

    Orthogonal time fre- quency space (OTFS) modulation for millimeter-wave communications systems,

    R. Hadani, S. Rakib, A. F. Molisch, C. Ibars, A. Monk, M. Tsatsanis, J. Delfeld, A. Goldsmith, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time fre- quency space (OTFS) modulation for millimeter-wave communications systems,” in 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS). IEEE,...

    2017

  156. [164]

    DFT-spread orthogonal time frequency space system with superimposed pilots for terahertz integrated sensing and communication,

    Y . Wu, C. Han, and Z. Chen, “DFT-spread orthogonal time frequency space system with superimposed pilots for terahertz integrated sensing and communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7361–7376, Nov. 2023

    2023

  157. [165]

    A tutorial on mathematical modeling of 5G/6G millimeter wave and terahertz cellular systems,

    D. Moltchanov, E. Sopin, V . Begishev, A. Samuylov, Y . Koucheryavy, and K. Samouylov, “A tutorial on mathematical modeling of 5G/6G millimeter wave and terahertz cellular systems,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1072–1116, Second Quart. 2022

    2022

  158. [166]

    OTFS transceiver design and sparse doubly-selective CSI estimation in analog and hybrid beamforming aided mmwave MIMO systems,

    S. Srivastava, R. K. Singh, A. K. Jagannatham, A. Chockalingam, and L. Hanzo, “OTFS transceiver design and sparse doubly-selective CSI estimation in analog and hybrid beamforming aided mmwave MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 10 902– 10 917, Dec. 2022

    2022

  159. [167]

    Beam-space MIMO radar for joint communication and sensing with OTFS modulation,

    S. K. Dehkordi, L. Gaudio, M. Kobayashi, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “Beam-space MIMO radar for joint communication and sensing with OTFS modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 6737–6749, Oct. 2023

    2023

  160. [168]

    Off-grid channel estimation for OTFS-based mmwave hybrid beamforming systems,

    Y . Yan, C. Shan, J. Zhang, and H. Zhao, “Off-grid channel estimation for OTFS-based mmwave hybrid beamforming systems,” IEEE Com- mun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2167–2171, Aug. 2023

    2023

  161. [169]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,

    Y . Liu, X. Liu, X. Mu, T. Hou, J. Xu, M. Di Renzo, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546–1577, Third Quart. 2021

    2021

  162. [170]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communica- 26 tions: Principles, challenges, and opportunities,

    M. A. ElMossallamy, H. Zhang, L. Song, K. G. Seddik, Z. Han, and G. Y . Li, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communica- 26 tions: Principles, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Trans. on Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 990–1002, Sep. 2020

    2020

  163. [171]

    Joint channel estima- tion and data detection for hybrid RIS aided millimeter wave OTFS systems,

    M. Li, S. Zhang, Y . Ge, F. Gao, and P. Fan, “Joint channel estima- tion and data detection for hybrid RIS aided millimeter wave OTFS systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 6832–6848, Oct. 2022

    2022

  164. [172]

    OTFS-aided RIS-assisted SAGIN systems outperform their OFDM counterparts in doubly selective high-Doppler scenarios,

    C. Xu, L. Xiang, J. An, C. Dong, S. Sugiura, R. G. Maunder, L.- L. Yang, and L. Hanzo, “OTFS-aided RIS-assisted SAGIN systems outperform their OFDM counterparts in doubly selective high-Doppler scenarios,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 682–703, Jan. 2023

    2023

  165. [173]

    Reconfigurable- intelligent-surface-aided OTFS: Transmission scheme and channel es- timation,

    Z. Li, W. Yuan, B. Li, J. Wu, C. You, and F. Meng, “Reconfigurable- intelligent-surface-aided OTFS: Transmission scheme and channel es- timation,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 19 518–19 532, Nov. 2023

    2023

  166. [174]

    Performance analysis of OCDM for wireless communications,

    M. S. Omar and X. Ma, “Performance analysis of OCDM for wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 4032–4043, Jul. 2021

    2021

  167. [175]

    Affine frequency division multiplexing with index modulation: Full diversity condition, performance analysis, and low-complexity detection,

    Y . Tao, M. Wen, Y . Ge, J. Li, E. Basar, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Affine frequency division multiplexing with index modulation: Full diversity condition, performance analysis, and low-complexity detection,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , pp. 1–1, 2025. Qinwen Deng (Member, IEEE) rece...

    2025

  168. [2005]

    He was a member of technical committee on Statistical Signal and Array Processing and member of technical committee on Signal Processing for Communications (1994-2003). Dr. Ding was the General Chair of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Pr...

    1994

  169. [2019]

    Ding received the IEEE Communication Society’s WTC Award in 2012 and the IEEE Communication Society’s Education Award in 2020

    Prof. Ding received the IEEE Communication Society’s WTC Award in 2012 and the IEEE Communication Society’s Education Award in 2020

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.