Quantum Schwarzschild-(A)dS Black Holes: Unitarity and Singularity Resolution

Sofie Ried; Steffen Gielen

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Quantum Schwarzschild-(A)dS Black Holes: Unitarity and Singularity Resolution

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Requiring unitarity in unimodular time removes the classical singularity in quantum Schwarzschild–(Anti-)de Sitter spacetime.

desk verdict Serious, self-aware minisuperspace quantization: singularity resolution via unitarity in unimodular time works within the truncation and is explicitly clock-dependent, a caveat the authors concede. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10104 v2 pith:QOGCOMGY submitted 2025-02-14 hep-th gr-qc

Steffen Gielen , Sofie Ried This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 83C4583C5783C75 PACS 04.60.-m04.70.Dy

keywords unimodulargravityself-adjointextensionsingularityresolutionSchwarzschild–(Anti-)deSitterblackholetowhitetransitionminisuperspaceWheeler–DeWittequationtime

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show how a purely quantum-mechanical requirement—unitarity of evolution with respect to a preferred clock called unimodular time—removes the classical curvature singularity at the centre of a Schwarzschild–(Anti-)de Sitter black hole. In the model, the cosmological constant becomes conjugate to unimodular time, so the Wheeler–DeWitt constraint becomes a Schrödinger equation and demanding unitary evolution is equivalent to demanding that the Hamiltonian be self-adjoint. The authors construct a physically motivated one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions and compute, for semiclassical Gaussian states, closed-form expectation values of the metric components. These expectation values stay finite at T=0 and interpolate between a black hole at early times and a white hole, a time-reversed black hole, at late times, giving an explicit nonsingular line element. If correct, the result establishes unitarity in a suitable clock as a concrete singularity-resolution mechanism in this minisuperspace model.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Schrödinger-type Hamiltonian Ĥ_S = (ℏ²/η²)∂η∂ξ − 1/η², obtained by Laplace–Beltrami factor-ordering of the unimodular Hamiltonian constraint. Because the cosmological constant Λ appears linearly, the constraint becomes a Schrödinger equation in unimodular time T; unitarity in T is equivalent to self-adjointness of Ĥ_S in the inner product (47). Self-adjoint extensions are parametrized by an odd function χ(k), and the discrete symmetry η→−η, ξ→β−ξ reduces this to a one-parameter family χ(k)=kβ. That boundary condition—α(Λ,−k)=$e^{{ikβ}}$α(Λ,k)—lets a semiclassical state contain both k=±k_c modes while remaining nonsingular at η=0.

What would settle it

Compute the expectation value of the Kretschmann scalar in the semiclassical state (78); if it diverges as T→0 despite ⟨η̂⟩ and ⟨ξ̂⟩ staying finite, the claimed singularity resolution is not a resolution of curvature. Alternatively, repeat the construction with a different physically motivated clock and check whether ⟨η̂⟩ vanishes at the classical singularity time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that imposing unitarity in unimodular time is a mechanism for singularity resolution in quantum Schwarzschild–(Anti-)de Sitter spacetime. In this minisuperspace model, the configuration-space boundary η=0 is a curvature singularity; unitarity forces the wavefunction to satisfy a boundary condition there, encoded in a self-adjoint extension of the Hamiltonian. For the semiclassical Gaussian state (78), expectation values (83) and (86) remain finite at T=0, and the quantum line element (89) interpolates between a classical black hole with k=-k_c for T→-∞ and a white hole with k=+k_c for T→+∞. The sign of the self-adjoint extension parameter β fixes the sign of the semiclassical mass, so a β>0 theory contains only positive-mass black/white holes. The paper also identifies tunnelling states that connect positive- and negative-mass asymptotic regions, but these are non-semiclassical at high curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the correct physical criterion is unitarity with respect to unimodular time T, which makes the Hamiltonian self-adjoint in the chosen inner product; if a different clock, inner product, or boundary condition is used, the singularity resolution may disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At T=0 the expectation values ⟨η̂⟩ and ⟨ξ̂⟩ stay finite, so the semiclassical line element (89) is nonsingular, matching a classical black hole at T→−∞ and a white hole at T→+∞.
Each self-adjoint extension fixes the sign of the semiclassical mass; choosing β>0 gives only positive-mass black/white holes, avoiding negative-mass states without an extra censorship assumption.
Tunnelling states with α_abs can switch the sign of the mass, but their variance diverges near T=0, so the sign separation holds only in the semiclassical regime.
In the asymptotically AdS case, the bulk singularity resolution is in tension with holographic no-transmission arguments, since unitarity in unimodular time has no direct boundary analogue.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper tests singularity resolution through metric components rather than curvature invariants; computing expectation values of the Kretschmann scalar in the same states would provide a sharper test of whether the curvature singularity is genuinely gone.
The same self-adjointness criterion could be applied to charged or rotating black holes, where a Cauchy horizon may alter the semiclassical behaviour; the paper does not perform that analysis.
The white-hole continuation suggests that information could pass through the quantum region, but the authors do not construct a unitary scattering map for matter or radiation, so the information-paradox connection remains an inference.
Because the model truncates to minisuperspace, the result should be read as a semiclassical statement; inhomogeneous perturbations could reintroduce singular behaviour in a more complete quantization.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a careful and largely honest minisuperspace quantization of Schwarzschild-(A)dS in unimodular gravity. What's new: it extends the planar-interior result [37] to the full spacetime including exterior regions and cosmological constant, derives the full set of self-adjoint extensions of the Schrödinger-like Hamiltonian, identifies the one-parameter family compatible with the parity-like symmetry, and produces explicit analytic expectation values for semiclassical Gaussian states. The resulting line element (89) interpolates between black and white hole states with finite ⟨η⟩ at T=0. That's a concrete, checkable proposal.

What it does well: the self-adjointness analysis is rigorous — direct calculation and deficiency indices agree. The variance calculation for ξ is genuinely used, not ornamental: it distinguishes the semiclassical state ψsc from the tunnelling state ψabs, backed by a computation showing the variance never drops below 1 for ψabs. The paper also flags its own soft spots. Section 4.3 explicitly says the minisuperspace truncation cannot be rigorously justified, and Section 5 concedes that unitary T-evolution cannot simply be justified by unitary time evolution in the exterior where T is spacelike.

The soft spots are real but disclosed. The whole mechanism rests on the choice of unimodular time as clock and self-adjointness of Ĥ_S in that inner product. The alternative justification — Λ should be a self-adjoint observable — presupposes the same inner product. The cited clock-dependence results [28–30] already show singularity resolution changes with clock, so the central claim is conditional. That is not a hidden flaw; it is an acknowledged premise, and the stress-test concern, while fair, does not land as a defect. Within the truncation, the analysis is internally consistent. One smaller gap: the paper does not compute a quantum version of the Kretschmann scalar, which would be a more direct singularity indicator; the authors note this as future work.

Who this is for: people working on canonical quantum gravity, the problem of time, and black hole singularity resolution. It gives a concrete model to compare with LQG and other effective approaches. It deserves a serious referee; my own verdict would be conditional accept, with the clock-dependence caveat kept prominent. Send it to review.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper quantizes a spherically symmetric minisuperspace model of Schwarzschild-(A)dS spacetime in unimodular gravity, in which the Hamiltonian constraint becomes a Schrödinger equation in unimodular time T. It constructs the quantum theory on the full configuration space ξ ∈ R and determines self-adjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian, first by a direct calculation of the inner product and then by deficiency indices. The extensions are labelled by an odd function χ(k), which is further restricted to a one-parameter family χ(k)=kβ by a proposed symmetry argument. For Gaussian semiclassical states satisfying the resulting boundary condition, the paper derives analytical expressions for ⟨η⟩, ⟨ξ⟩ and ⟨dξ/η⟩ and their variances, and shows that these expectation values interpolate between a classical black hole at large negative T and a white hole at large positive T while remaining finite at T=0. This yields a proposed nonsingular effective line element (89). The paper also constructs tunnelling states that connect opposite-sign mass solutions but are not semiclassical in the high-curvature region.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides one of the few minisuperspace models in which singularity resolution is tied to a precise operator condition, namely self-adjointness of the quantum Hamiltonian in the unimodular-time inner product, and it gives explicit analytical metric expectation values rather than only qualitative statements. Strengths of the paper include the direct derivation of the boundary condition from T-independence of the inner product, the cross-check by deficiency indices, the careful regularization of homogeneous distributions in the expectation-value calculations, and the variance analysis showing that the Gaussian state ψsc is semiclassical everywhere while the tunnelling state ψabs is not. The identification of the sign of β with the sign of the black/white-hole mass is a clean and interesting result. The main limitations are explicitly acknowledged in the paper: the central role of the clock choice and the minisuperspace truncation. These limitations are not hidden, but they do mean that the singularity-resolution claim is conditional on a physical input that is not derived within the model.

major comments (4)

[Section 5 (Discussion)] The paper states that 'imposing unitarity of T evolution in our theory can not simply be justified by the requirement of unitary time evolution' and instead appeals to self-adjointness of the observable Λ. This is a load-bearing concession: the boundary condition (63), and hence the k↔−k superposition that makes ⟨η⟩sc nonzero at T=0, follows only if the unimodular-time inner product (47) is accepted as the physical one. The cited clock-dependence results [28–30] show that singularity resolution is not invariant under a change of clock in minisuperspace models. As written, the abstract's statement that 'imposing unitarity in unimodular time is a mechanism for singularity resolution' overstates the conclusion; the result should be presented as a conditional statement for this particular clock, or the authors should provide an independent physical argument for why T, rather than another relational clock, is the correct time.
[Section 3.2, Eq. (74)] The reduction of the self-adjoint extension parameter from an arbitrary odd function χ(k) to the one-parameter family χ(k)=kβ is based on invariance under η→−η, ξ→β−ξ. However, the Hilbert space defined by the inner product (47) is L²([0,∞)×R, 2η² dη dξ), so wavefunctions are not defined for negative η. The transformation (74) therefore does not map the domain of Ĥ_S to itself and is not a symmetry of the quantum theory in the usual sense. The mass-sign statement and the specific form of the semiclassical state (78) depend on this step. Please either justify the symmetry on a double cover or on distributions, or explicitly treat the restriction to χ(k)=kβ as an additional physical input whose consequences are explored.
[Section 4.1, Eq. (89)] Singularity resolution is concluded from finiteness of ⟨η⟩sc and ⟨ξ⟩sc (and ⟨dξ/η⟩sc). The classical singularity is a curvature singularity, as shown by the Kretschmann scalar (28) diverging as η^{-6}. The paper does not compute the expectation value of any curvature invariant or the curvature of the effective line element (89), and Section 5 explicitly leaves this to future work. Without such a computation, the claim that the quantum-corrected geometry is 'nonsingular' is not fully established; at minimum, the abstract and title should be qualified, or a curvature invariant should be computed.
[Section 3.2, Eqs. (59)–(66)] The derivation of the unitarity condition (63) treats the plane-wave eigenfunctions (44) as generalized states and then identifies the Hilbert-space norm with |ψ|² = ∫ |k||α(Λ,k)|² dΛ dk/(2π)². The relation between self-adjoint extensions of Ĥ_S on the original L² space and the condition (63) on α is asserted after a distributional calculation; the deficiency-index argument is done separately on the η,ξ representation. Please spell out the unitary equivalence between the two descriptions and state the domain of Ĥ_S in the α-representation explicitly. This is needed because all subsequent results, including the semiclassical state (78), are formulated in the α-representation.

minor comments (4)

[Equations (26), (85), (87)] The cube-root notation is ambiguous: the text uses '3√' or '3 p' where a consistent $\sqrt[3]{...}$ notation is meant. Please use a single unambiguous notation throughout.
[Section 2 and Fig. 3 caption] There are typographical errors: 'Kantwoski–Sachs' should be 'Kantowski–Sachs', and the Fig. 3 caption contains 'indepedent' instead of 'independent'.
[Eq. (88) and Eq. (121)] The regularized integral in Eq. (88) is introduced without explanation in the main text; the regularization defined in Eq. (121) should be stated at the first occurrence.
[Section 4.3] The statement that excluding inhomogeneous degrees of freedom is 'an assumption we cannot rigorously justify' is important enough to be repeated in the abstract or conclusions, so that the singularity-resolution claim is not read as a statement about full quantum gravity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the singularity-resolution mechanism follows from an explicit, self-contained self-adjointness calculation; the main caveats are stated physical assumptions, not hidden renamings.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained from the classical constraint to the quantum boundary condition. The Wheeler-DeWitt equation (43) and eigenbasis (45) are solved directly; the inner product (47) and self-adjointness requirement lead to the boundary condition alpha(Lambda,-k)=e^{i chi(k)} alpha(Lambda,k) (63), derived both by direct integration and by deficiency indices (69)-(73). This is a genuine mathematical result, not an input masquerading as a prediction. The semiclassical state (78) is explicitly chosen to satisfy (63), with alpha peaked at k=+/- kc; the asymptotic +/- kc behaviour of <eta> and <xi> in (85)-(87) therefore follows from the state's support, which is a transparent input, while the finiteness at T=0 follows from the boundary-condition-forced superposition and the Gaussian spread in Lambda, not from parameters fitted to a desired nonsingular metric. The identification beta=2 xi0, whence sign(beta)=sign(M), is made explicitly by comparing (86) with the classical solution (26); it is a labeling of the self-adjoint extension parameter, not a hidden derivation, and it is not load-bearing for the singularity-resolution claim. The paper openly concedes in Section 5 that imposing unitarity of T evolution 'can not simply be justified by the requirement of unitary time evolution' and that the justification is the self-adjointness of Lambda; this is a stated physical assumption about the clock and inner product, not a circular step. The minisuperspace truncation is likewise acknowledged in Section 4.3. Citations to the authors' earlier work [28-30,37] provide context (clock dependence, planar black hole analogue) but are not used to prove the present self-adjoint extension calculation. No load-bearing self-citation chain or fitted-input-called-prediction step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the quantization choices listed above: the symmetry-reduced metric ansatz, the Laplace-Beltrami operator ordering, the inner product defining unitarity, the reduction of self-adjoint extensions to a one-parameter family, the use of unimodular time as clock, and the classical Henneaux-Teitelboim action. The Gaussian state parameters (kc, Λc, σk, σΛ, β, γ) are chosen by hand to define the semiclassical states; none are fitted to data, and the qualitative singularity resolution does not depend on their precise values.

free parameters (6)

kc = Chosen in plots; values 1-90
Peak of the Gaussian in |k|; defines the mass scale of the semiclassical state. Not fitted to data.
Λc = Chosen in plots; values like 0.3, 1
Peak of the Gaussian in the cosmological constant Λ. Not fitted to data.
σ_k = Chosen in plots; values 0.1, 1, 10
Width in k; semiclassical limit requires σ_k << k_c. Not fitted to data.
σ_Λ = Chosen in plots; values 0.1, 0.2, 1
Width in Λ; controls spread of unimodular time. Not fitted to data.
β = 2 in main plots; β > 0 for positive mass
Self-adjoint extension parameter; sign determines sign of semiclassical mass. Chosen positive to exclude negative masses.
γ = -2 in tunnelling example
Parameter of the tunnelling state ψ_abs; does not change the self-adjoint extension. Chosen for illustration.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Spherically symmetric minisuperspace reduction with metric ansatz (1), neglecting inhomogeneous modes.
The entire quantization is performed after symmetry reduction; authors note in Section 4.3 that inhomogeneous degrees of freedom are excluded and cannot rigorously be justified.
domain assumption Laplace-Beltrami operator ordering for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation (eq. 42).
Operator ordering is fixed by covariance in the (η, ξ) subspace; other orderings would give different quantum theories.
domain assumption The Schrödinger-type inner product (47) on η > 0, ξ ∈ R defines the Hilbert space; self-adjointness with respect to this inner product is the unitarity requirement.
This is the central quantization criterion; it is a choice of inner product and of what 'unitarity' means here.
ad hoc to paper Restriction to the one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions χ(k) = kβ via the symmetry (74).
The full family of self-adjoint extensions is parametrized by an arbitrary odd function χ(k) (eq. 63). The reduction to one parameter is motivated by an analogy with parity invariance, not forced by the mathematics.
domain assumption Unimodular time T is a good clock even where T-evolution is spacelike (exterior); self-adjointness of Ĥ_S is required because Λ should be self-adjoint.
The paper notes in Section 5 that imposing unitarity in T cannot always be justified by unitary time evolution; the justification is the self-adjointness of the observable Λ.
standard math The classical Hamiltonian constraint and generating function S from the Henneaux-Teitelboim unimodular action.
Standard formulation of unimodular gravity; references [34, 36].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Schwarzschild-(A)dS Black Holes: Unitarity and Singularity Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOGCOMGY

@misc{pith2026250210104,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Schwarzschild-(A)dS Black Holes: Unitarity and Singularity Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOGCOMGY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10104}
}

read the original abstract

We consider the canonical quantisation of spherically symmetric spacetimes within unimodular gravity, leaving sign choices in the metric general enough to include both the interior and exterior Schwarzschild-(Anti-)de Sitter spacetime. In unimodular gravity the cosmological constant appears as an integration constant analogous to a total energy, and the quantum Wheeler-DeWitt equation takes the form of a Schr\"odinger equation in unimodular time. We discuss self-adjoint extensions of the Schr\"odinger-like Hamiltonian arising from the requirement of unitarity in unimodular time, and identify a physically motivated one-parameter family of extensions. For semiclassical states we are able to derive analytical expressions for expectation values of the metric, representing a quantum-corrected, nonsingular extension of the classical Schwarzschild-(A)dS geometry which describes a quantum transition between asymptotic black hole and white hole states. The sign of the self-adjoint extension parameter corresponds to the allowed sign of the black hole/white hole mass, and so it can be chosen to ensure that this mass is always positive. We also discuss tunnelling states which allow for a change in the sign of the mass, but which are not semiclassical in high-curvature regions. Our mechanism for singularity resolution and the explicit form of the quantum-corrected metric can be compared to other proposals for black holes in quantum gravity, and in the asymptotically AdS case can be contrasted with holographic arguments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10104 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Visualisation of ξ(T) for different choices of Λ and k and positive white hole mass M = 4πk2 ξ0, with ξ0 = 1. For positive Λ there are solutions with two horizons as well as cosmological solutions. For negative Λ all solution have an event horizon, the location of which depends on the mass. this implies πξ = 0. In this case eq. (14) gives η = 1 √ Λ . (29) Such solutions only exist for Λ > 0. The expressions for ξ an… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Visualisation of the expectation values ⟨ηˆ⟩sc and ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc for different values of kc and Λc. The solid lines correspond to the quantum expectation values and the dashed lines of the same colour correspond to the classical solutions with k = ±kc and Λ = Λc. Here β = 2. One can see that for large T the classical and quantum solutions agree very well but that ⟨ηˆ⟩sc does not vanish at the origin, resolving the singula… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (9 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The solid lines show ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc/⟨ηˆ⟩sc, while the dashed lines in the same colour correspond to classical solutions with Λ = Λc and k = ±kc. For a semiclassical state, these plots of ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc/⟨ηˆ⟩sc approximately describe the behaviour of ⟨ξ/η d⟩sc and therefore show that…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The solid lines show ⟨ξ/η d⟩sc, while the dashed lines in fig. 5a and fig. 5b in the same colour correspond to the classical solutions with Λ = Λc and k = ±kc. In fig. 5c the dashed lines correspond to ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc/⟨ηˆ⟩sc. The plots look very similar to each other indicatin…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The solid lines show ⟨ξ/η d⟩sc, while the dashed lines in the same colour correspond to the classical solutions with Λ = Λc and k = kc. One can see that the classical solutions do not diverge for T = 0, as there is no black or white hole. beyond de Sitter into a new de…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Conformal diagram of two de Sitter spacetimes connected by a ”quantum region”. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Plots of Var(ξ) in the states ψsc (fig. 8a and fig. 8b) and ψabs (fig. 8c and fig. 8d). The self-adjoint extension parameter is taken to be β = 2 for ψsc. For ψabs, we choose γ = −2. In the state ψsc the variance can be made arbitrarily small everywhere by increasing σ…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The solid lines show ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc and the partially translucent region around a line corresponds to the values within one standard deviation away from the expectation value. One can see that especially close to the origin the behaviour is semiclassical. The calculation of ⟨…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Plot of erf(x). The plot of the error function shown in fig. 10 illustrates the meaning of this alteration to the expectation value of ˆξ. For early times T ≪ 0 the expectation values agree ⟨ ˆξ⟩sc ≈ ⟨ˆξ⟩abs if γ = β is chosen. For very late times T ≫ 0 the new term a…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Plots of ⟨ ˆξ⟩abs in solid lines and classical solutions ξ(T,Λc, kc, ξ0 = 1) in dashed lines and ξ(T,Λc, −kc, ξ0 = −1) in dotted lines. One can see that for asymptotically large positive and negative times the quantum expectation value agrees well with the respective …

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The solid lines show ⟨ ˆξ⟩abs and the partially translucent region around a line corresponds to the values within one standard deviation away from the expectation value. One can see that there is a region around the origin where the behaviour of the state is highly qu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Inflation in unimodular loop quantum cosmology
gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In unimodular loop quantum cosmology, an α-attractor potential allows a potential-energy-dominated bounce at the Planck scale that is consistent with CMB observations and may show quantum-gravity imprints.
Singularity Resolution of Quantum Black Holes in (A)dS
gr-qc 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

Requiring unitary evolution in unimodular time resolves the Schwarzschild-(A)dS singularity and yields a quantum-corrected metric with a minimum radius r_min marking a black hole to white hole transition.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[37]

Black hole singularity resolution in unimodular gravity from unitarity

S. Gielen and L. Men´ endez-Pidal,Black hole singularity resolution in unimodular gravity from unitarity , Phys. Rev. Lett. in press(2025) [ 2409.03006]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[1]

Abbott, R

B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, M.R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

arXiv 2016
[2]

Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1 [1906.11238]

arXiv 2019
[3]

Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class

E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 243001 [ 1501.07274]

arXiv 2015
[4]

Calmet, B

X. Calmet, B. Carr and E. Winstanley, Quantum Black Holes , SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer, Berlin (2014), 10.1007/978-3-642-38939-9

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38939-9 2014
[5]

Hawking, Particle creation by black holes , Commun

S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

work page 1975
[6]

Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse , Phys

S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460

1976
[7]

Susskind, L

L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [ hep-th/9306069]

arXiv 1993

Show all 80 references

[8]

Almheiri, D

A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [ 1207.3123]

2013 arXiv
[9]

Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]

G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox , JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [ 1905.08255]

2020 arXiv
[10]

Kantowski and R.K

R. Kantowski and R.K. Sachs, Some Spatially Homogeneous Anisotropic Relativistic Cosmological Models, J. Math. Phys. 7 (1966) 443

1966
[11]

Husain and O

V. Husain and O. Winkler, Singularity resolution in quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 084016 [ gr-qc/0312094]

2004 arXiv
[12]

Ashtekar, Singularity resolution in loop quantum cosmology: A brief overview , J

A. Ashtekar, Singularity resolution in loop quantum cosmology: A brief overview , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 189 (2009) 012003 [ 0812.4703]

2009 arXiv
[13]

Kiefer, On the avoidance of classical singularities in quantum cosmology , J

C. Kiefer, On the avoidance of classical singularities in quantum cosmology , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222 (2010) 012049

2010
[14]

DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity

B.S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory , Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113

1967
[15]

Ashtekar and P

A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Loop quantum cosmology: a status report , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 213001 [ 1108.0893]. 42

2011 arXiv
[16]

Horowitz and J

G.T. Horowitz and J. Maldacena, The black hole final state , JHEP 02 (2004) 008 [hep-th/0310281]

2004 arXiv
[17]

Bouhmadi-L´ opez, S

M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, P. Chen and D.-h. Yeom, Annihilation-to-nothing: a quantum gravitational boundary condition for the Schwarzschild black hole , JCAP 11 (2020) 002 [ 1911.02129]

2020 arXiv
[18]

Perry, Future Boundaries and the Black Hole Information Paradox , 2108.05744

M.J. Perry, Future Boundaries and the Black Hole Information Paradox , 2108.05744

arXiv
[19]

Perry, No Future in Black Holes , 2106.03715

M.J. Perry, No Future in Black Holes , 2106.03715

arXiv
[20]

The Black hole final state

D. Gottesman and J. Preskill, Comment on “The Black hole final state” , JHEP 03 (2004) 026 [ hep-th/0311269]

2004 arXiv
[21]

Isham, Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time , in Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories , L.A

C.J. Isham, Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time , in Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories , L.A. Ibort and M.A. Rodriguez, eds., pp. 157–287, Springer Dordrecht (1993) [ gr-qc/9210011]

1993 arXiv
[22]

Kuchaˇ r,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity , Int

K.V. Kuchaˇ r,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20 (2011) 3

2011
[23]

Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity , Annalen Phys

E. Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity , Annalen Phys. 524 (2012) 757 [1206.2403]

2012 arXiv
[24]

Hartnoll, Wheeler–DeWitt states of the AdS-Schwarzschild interior , JHEP 01 (2023) 066 [ 2208.04348]

S.A. Hartnoll, Wheeler–DeWitt states of the AdS-Schwarzschild interior , JHEP 01 (2023) 066 [ 2208.04348]

2023 arXiv
[25]

Blacker and S

M.J. Blacker and S. Ning, Wheeler DeWitt states of a charged AdS 4 black hole, JHEP 12 (2023) 002 [ 2308.00040]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Gotay and J

M.J. Gotay and J. Demaret, Quantum cosmological singularities, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2402

1983
[27]

Gotay and J

M.J. Gotay and J. Demaret, Some remarks on singularities in quantum cosmology , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 57 (1997) 227 [ gr-qc/9605025]

1997 arXiv
[28]

Gielen and L

S. Gielen and L. Men´ endez-Pidal,Singularity resolution depends on the clock , Class. Quantum Grav. 37 (2020) 205018 [ 2005.05357]

2020 arXiv
[29]

Gielen and L

S. Gielen and L. Men´ endez-Pidal,Unitarity, clock dependence and quantum recollapse in quantum cosmology , Class. Quantum Grav. 39 (2022) 075011 [ 2109.02660]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Gielen and L

S. Gielen and L. Men´ endez-Pidal,Unitarity and quantum resolution of gravitational singularities, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31 (2022) 2241005 [ 2205.15387]

2022 arXiv
[31]

Anderson and D

J.L. Anderson and D. Finkelstein, Cosmological Constant and Fundamental Length , Am. J. Phys. 39 (1971) 901. 43

1971
[32]

Buchm¨ uller and N

W. Buchm¨ uller and N. Dragon,Gauge fixing and the cosmological constant , Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 313

1989
[33]

Unruh, Unimodular theory of canonical quantum gravity , Phys

W.G. Unruh, Unimodular theory of canonical quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 1048

1989
[34]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, The cosmological constant and general covariance , Phys. Lett. B 222 (1989) 195

1989
[35]

Carballo-Rubio, L.J

R. Carballo-Rubio, L.J. Garay and G. Garc ´ ıa-Moreno,Unimodular gravity vs general relativity: a status report , Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 243001 [ 2207.08499]

2022 arXiv
[36]

Unruh and R.M

W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2598

1989
[38]

Falls, D.F

K. Falls, D.F. Litim and A. Raghuraman, Black holes and asymptotically safe gravity , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1250019 [ 1002.0260]

2012 arXiv
[39]

A. Held, R. Gold and A. Eichhorn, Asymptotic safety casts its shadow , JCAP 06 (2019) 029 [ 1904.07133]

2019 arXiv
[40]

Gambini, J

R. Gambini, J. Olmedo and J. Pullin, Quantum black holes in loop quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 095009 [ 1310.5996]

2014 arXiv
[41]

Kelly, R

J.G. Kelly, R. Santacruz and E. Wilson-Ewing, Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 106024 [2006.09302]

2020 arXiv
[42]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo and P. Singh, Regular black holes from loop quantum gravity , in Regular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse , C. Bambi, ed., (Singapore), pp. 235–282, Springer Nature Singapore (2023), DOI [ 2301.01309]

2023 arXiv
[43]

Soltani, C

F. Soltani, C. Rovelli and P. Martin-Dussaud, End of a black hole’s evaporation. II. , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 066015 [ 2105.06876]

2021 arXiv
[44]

Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse , in GR5, Abstracts of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity , p

J. Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse , in GR5, Abstracts of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity , p. 87, Tbilisi University Press, 1968

1968
[45]

Dymnikova, Vacuum nonsingular black hole , Gen

I. Dymnikova, Vacuum nonsingular black hole , Gen. Rel. Grav. 24 (1992) 235

1992
[46]

Hayward, Formation and Evaporation of Nonsingular Black Holes , Phys

S.A. Hayward, Formation and Evaporation of Nonsingular Black Holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 031103 [ gr-qc/0506126]. 44

2006 arXiv
[47]

Engelhardt and G.T

N. Engelhardt and G.T. Horowitz, Holographic consequences of a no transmission principle, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 026005 [ 1509.07509]

2016 arXiv
[48]

Horowitz and R.C

G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, The value of singularities , Gen. Rel. Grav. 27 (1995) 915 [gr-qc/9503062]

1995 arXiv
[49]

Halliwell, Derivation of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation from a path integral for minisuperspace models, Phys

J.J. Halliwell, Derivation of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation from a path integral for minisuperspace models, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2468

1988
[50]

Uglum, Quantum cosmology of R × S2 × S1, Phys

J. Uglum, Quantum cosmology of R × S2 × S1, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 4365

1992
[51]

Conradi, Quantum cosmology of Kantowski–Sachs-like models , Class

H.-D. Conradi, Quantum cosmology of Kantowski–Sachs-like models , Class. Quantum Grav. 12 (1995) 2423 [ gr-qc/9412049]

1995 arXiv
[52]

Hartle and S.W

J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Wave function of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2960

1983
[53]

Vilenkin, Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the Universe , Phys

A. Vilenkin, Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 888

1988
[54]

Conradi and H.D

H.D. Conradi and H.D. Zeh, Quantum cosmology as an initial value problem , Phys. Lett. A 154 (1991) 321

1991
[55]

Conradi, Initial state in quantum cosmology , Phys

H.-D. Conradi, Initial state in quantum cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 612

1992
[56]

Kuchaˇ r,Does an unspecified cosmological constant solve the problem of time in quantum gravity?, Phys

K.V. Kuchaˇ r,Does an unspecified cosmological constant solve the problem of time in quantum gravity?, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3332

1991
[57]

Etkin, Quest for Time in Unimodular Gravity Theories , MSc Dissertation, Imperial College London, 2023

A. Etkin, Quest for Time in Unimodular Gravity Theories , MSc Dissertation, Imperial College London, 2023

2023
[58]

de Boer, The Holographic Renormalization Group , Fortsch

J. de Boer, The Holographic Renormalization Group , Fortsch. Phys. 49 (2001) 339 [hep-th/0101026]

2001 arXiv
[59]

Gibbons and S.W

G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738

1977
[60]

Maldacena and L

J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes , Fortsch. Phys. 61 781 [1306.0533]

arXiv
[61]

Socolovsky, Schwarzschild Black Hole in Anti-De Sitter Space , Adv

M. Socolovsky, Schwarzschild Black Hole in Anti-De Sitter Space , Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 28 (2018) 18 [ 1711.02744]

2018 arXiv
[62]

Gkigkitzis, I

I. Gkigkitzis, I. Haranas and O. Ragos, Kretschmann invariant and relations between space-time singularities, entropy and information , Phys. Int. 5 (2014) 103 [1406.1581]. 45

2014 arXiv
[63]

Nariai, On Some Static Solutions of Einstein ’s Gravitational Field Equations in a Spherically Symmetric Case , Gen

H. Nariai, On Some Static Solutions of Einstein ’s Gravitational Field Equations in a Spherically Symmetric Case , Gen. Rel. Grav. 31 (1999) 951

1999
[64]

Nariai, On a New Cosmological Solution of Einstein ’s Field Equations of Gravitation, Gen

H. Nariai, On a New Cosmological Solution of Einstein ’s Field Equations of Gravitation, Gen. Rel. Grav. 31 (1999) 963

1999
[65]

Page and W.K

D.N. Page and W.K. Wootters, Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables , Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2885

1983
[66]

Wootters, “Time” replaced by quantum correlations , Int

W.K. Wootters, “Time” replaced by quantum correlations , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23 (1984) 701

1984
[67]

H¨ ohn, A.R.H

P.A. H¨ ohn, A.R.H. Smith and M.P.E. Lock,Trinity of relational quantum dynamics , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 066001 [ 1912.00033]

2021 arXiv
[68]

Bonneau, J

G. Bonneau, J. Faraut and G. Valent, Self-adjoint extensions of operators and the teaching of quantum mechanics , Am. J. Phys. 69 (2001) 322 [ quant-ph/0103153]

2001 arXiv
[69]

Daughton, J

A. Daughton, J. Louko and R.D. Sorkin, Instantons and unitarity in quantum cosmology with fixed four-volume , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 084008 [ gr-qc/9805101]

1998 arXiv
[70]

Schm¨ udgen,Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space , vol

K. Schm¨ udgen,Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space , vol. 265 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics , Springer Netherlands (2012), 10.1007/978-94-007-4753-1

2012 doi
[71]

Abramowitz and I.A

M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards (1964)

1964
[72]

Gielen and R.B

S. Gielen and R.B. Neves, Low-curvature quantum corrections from unitary evolution of de Sitter space , 2412.01907

arXiv
[73]

Gubser, Curvature singularities: The good, the bad, and the naked , Adv

S.S. Gubser, Curvature singularities: The good, the bad, and the naked , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 679 [ hep-th/0002160]

2000 arXiv
[74]

Katoch, J

G. Katoch, J. Ren and S.R. Roy, Quantum complexity and bulk timelike singularities , JHEP 12 (2023) 085 [ 2303.02752]

2023 arXiv
[75]

Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [ hep-th/0106113]

A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [ hep-th/0106113]

2001 arXiv
[76]

E. Witten, Quantum gravity in de Sitter space , in Strings 2001: Proceedings of the Strings 2001 Conference, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, January 5-10, 2001 , Clay Mathematics Proceedings, 2001 [ hep-th/0106109]

2001 arXiv
[77]

Anninos, F

D. Anninos, F. Denef, R. Monten and Z. Sun, Higher spin de Sitter Hilbert Space , JHEP 10 (2019) 071 [ 1711.10037]. 46

2019 arXiv
[78]

Leuven, E

S. Leuven, E. Verlinde and M. Visser, Towards non-AdS holography via the long string phenomenon, JHEP 06 (2018) 097 [ 1801.02589]

2018 arXiv
[79]

Magueijo and G.S

J. Magueijo and G.S. Manchanda, Quantum wormholes at the end of the world , 2501.08272

arXiv
[80]

Gel’fand and G

I.M. Gel’fand and G. Shilov, Generalized Functions: Properties and operations, by IM Gel’fand and GE Shilov, translated by E. Saletan , vol. 1, Academic Press (1964). 47

1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [37]

Black hole singularity resolution in unimodular gravity from unitarity

S. Gielen and L. Men´ endez-Pidal,Black hole singularity resolution in unimodular gravity from unitarity , Phys. Rev. Lett. in press(2025) [ 2409.03006]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[2] [1]

Abbott, R

B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, M.R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

arXiv 2016

[3] [2]

Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1 [1906.11238]

arXiv 2019

[4] [3]

Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class

E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 243001 [ 1501.07274]

arXiv 2015

[5] [4]

Calmet, B

X. Calmet, B. Carr and E. Winstanley, Quantum Black Holes , SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer, Berlin (2014), 10.1007/978-3-642-38939-9

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38939-9 2014

[6] [5]

Hawking, Particle creation by black holes , Commun

S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

work page 1975

[7] [6]

Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse , Phys

S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460

1976

[8] [7]

Susskind, L

L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [ hep-th/9306069]

arXiv 1993