Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

THz electric field control of spins in collinear antiferromagnet Cr$_{2}$O$_{3}$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In collinear antiferromagnet Cr2O3, the 0.165 THz spin resonance is excited by the electric field of a THz pulse via the linear magnetoelectric torque, with efficiency comparable to the Zeeman torque from the pulse's magnetic field.

desk verdict A credible demonstration of THz electric-field spin resonance in Cr2O3, with a solid qualitative core and a conditional quantitative branch that needs error bars and alignment characterization. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10181 v1 pith:Z4P6WDQ5 submitted 2025-02-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

V. R. Bilyk , R. M. Dubrovin , A. K. Zvezdin , A. I. Kirilyuk , A. V. Kimel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.50.Ee75.85.+t76.50.+g
keywords antiferromagnetmagnetoelectriceffectterahertzspindynamicsCr2O3magnonTHzexcitationresonanceelectric-fieldcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that in the collinear antiferromagnet Cr2O3, a THz pulse can set the spins precessing using its electric field alone, without an electromagnon. The 0.165 THz antiferromagnetic resonance is excited by the linear magnetoelectric torque, which converts the applied electric field into an effective magnetic action on the spins. In a freely propagating THz wave, this electric torque is as strong as the conventional Zeeman torque from the pulse's magnetic field. The two mechanisms are distinguished experimentally by their different dependence on the Néel vector direction and field orientation: rotating the THz field by 45° versus −45° maximizes one and cancels the other, and reversing the antiferromagnetic domain flips the phase of the electric-field-driven signal but not the magnetic-driven one. The implication is that electric-field pulses, which are easier to localize on a chip than magnetic fields, can be a viable ultrafast control knob for antiferromagnetic spins.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linear magnetoelectric torque, derived from a two-sublattice Lagrangian for Cr2O3 with energy U = −λ⊥ mx ly Ex − λ‖ my ly Ey − (γS/ħ)(mx Hx + my Hy). This interaction converts an applied electric field into a term in the antiferromagnetic-resonance equation of motion of exactly the same form as the Zeeman torque, with strength set by the magnetoelectric coefficient α⊥. The model reduces the full four-variable dynamics (canting angles ǫ, β and deviations ϑ1, ϕ1) to a driven harmonic oscillator for mx, whose phase and amplitude depend on the domain orientation, providing the signatures that separate electric from magnetic excitation.

What would settle it

Take a single-domain Cr2O3 sample, measure the oscillation amplitude versus the angle between H_THz and the c-axis through the nominal H_THz ∥ L orientation with the polarization and crystal alignment characterized to about 0.1°, and check whether the signal goes through a flat, non-zero minimum as the model predicts for the magnetoelectric torque, or falls to zero as it would if only a residual perpendicular Zeeman component were responsible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using THz pump–infrared probe experiments on a single crystal of Cr2O3 below TN = 307 K, the authors observe coherent spin oscillations at 0.165 THz in two geometries: the Zeeman geometry where H_THz is perpendicular to L and the magnetoelectric geometry where H_THz is parallel to L (equivalently E_THz is perpendicular to L). The second geometry is striking because the Zeeman torque must vanish there; nevertheless the oscillation amplitude is comparable to the first geometry and scales linearly with the THz field. The authors attribute this to a linear magnetoelectric torque, captured in their two-sublattice Lagrangian by a term −λ⊥ mx ly Ex. Solving the equations of motion yields mẍ + ωM² mx = ±ωA ωME⊥ E_x + γωA H_x, and the model accounts for the observed linear scaling, the π phase shift upon rotating the fields by π, and the domain-dependent phase flip in the magnetoelectric geometry. The conclusion is that in a collinear magnetoelectric antiferromagnet, the THz electric field excites the same antiferromagnetic resonance as the THz magnetic field, with comparable efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the electric-field excitation rests on the geometry where the THz magnetic field is exactly parallel to the Néel vector; any residual perpendicular magnetic component from crystal misalignment or polarization leakage would produce the same signal through the Zeeman torque.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electric-field pulses applied via on-chip electrodes could excite and manipulate antiferromagnetic spins at THz rates without needing bulky magnetic antennas.
  • THz spectroscopy and magnonics experiments on magnetoelectric antiferromagnets must now consider electric-field coupling alongside magnetic-field coupling when interpreting signals.
  • The comparable magnitude of the two torques suggests that engineering the magnetoelectric coefficient could make electric-field control of antiferromagnetic order practical.
  • The mechanism works in a collinear antiferromagnet without electromagnons, broadening the class of materials for electric-field-driven spin dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the effect generalizes, other collinear magnetoelectric antiferromagnets should show similar THz electric-field-excited resonances; a quick survey could be done by repeating the same two-geometry test on candidate crystals.
  • The paper neglects the internal parametric torques (Ey and Hy terms) at the field strengths used; at higher THz intensities these could drive parametric instabilities, turning the linear effect into a nonlinear amplification channel.
  • Because electric fields are easier to confine than magnetic fields, the same mechanism might enable writing of nanoscale antiferromagnetic bits with picosecond electric pulses, though the paper demonstrates coherent precession rather than switching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports THz pump–infrared probe experiments on a single crystal of the collinear antiferromagnet Cr2O3 and shows that the 0.165 THz antiferromagnetic resonance can be excited not only in the conventional Zeeman geometry (H_THz perpendicular to the Néel vector L) but also in the geometry H_THz parallel to L, i.e. E_THz perpendicular to L. The authors attribute the second excitation channel to the linear magnetoelectric torque and support this with an angle-dependent amplitude maximum at α = 45° and a near-null at α = −45°, linear scaling with THz field strength, and a π phase shift upon reversal of the Néel vector in the magnetoelectric geometry. A two-sublattice Lagrangian model is developed and reduced to Eq. (17), m_ẍ + ω_M² m_x = ±ω_A ω_ME⊥ E_x + γω_A H_x, which accounts for the observed domain-dependent phase behavior. From the assumed near-equality of the two torques in Eq. (17), the authors estimate THz magnetoelectric parameters λ_THz⊥κ_THz⊥ ≈ −1 and α_THz⊥ ≈ −1.2 × 10⁻⁴.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper is significant: electric-field excitation of spin resonance in a collinear antiferromagnet with efficiency comparable to the THz Zeeman torque would extend ultrafast electric-field control beyond electromagnon-based multiferroics and is directly relevant to antiferromagnetic spintronics and THz magnonics. The qualitative claim rests on strong internal controls that are independent of parameter fitting: the α-dependence with a null at −45°, the linear field scaling, and the domain-reversal phase flip are all predicted by the symmetry-based model and are observed. The main reservations concern the quantitative branch: the amplitudes and phase data are presented without error bars, the residual Zeeman contamination in the nominally zero-torque geometry is not bounded, and the THz magnetoelectric parameters are extracted from the same 'comparable torques' assumption that the paper aims to establish.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1a / Experimental setup] The magnetoelectric geometry is defined by H_THz parallel to L, so the Zeeman torque γω_A H_x in Eq. (17) is assumed to vanish. The manuscript does not report the accuracy of the crystal c-axis alignment relative to the y axis, the extinction ratio of the two wire-grid polarizers, or any direct bound on the residual H_x in this geometry; a 2° misalignment already gives about 3.5% and a 5° misalignment about 9% H_x contamination. Such contamination shifts the α-null in Fig. 1c by several degrees and changes the inferred magnetoelectric/Zeeman amplitude ratio by the same percentage without destroying the near-π phase flip seen in Fig. 2c. Please state the alignment accuracy and polarization purity quantitatively and provide an explicit upper bound on the residual Zeeman contribution in the magnetoelectric geometry.
  2. [Methods, after Eq. (20)] The values λ_THz⊥κ_THz⊥ ≈ −1 and α_THz⊥ ≈ −1.2 × 10⁻⁴ are obtained by inserting the assumption |ω_Aω_ME⊥E_x| ≈ |γω_A H_x| into Eq. (17), i.e., by assuming the very 'comparable torques' result that the paper claims to demonstrate. This makes the quantitative branch of the parameter estimate circular, although the qualitative claim of electric-field excitation is not circular because the α-scan null and the domain-reversal phase shift are independent of parameter fitting. Please provide an independent determination of the THz magnetoelectric parameter from the static α⊥ together with measured dielectric and optical responses, or explicitly label the THz parameters as order-of-magnitude estimates made under the equality assumption.
  3. [Figs. 1c–1e and 2c] The amplitudes, the α-null angle, the field-scaling data, and the domain-phase comparison are presented without error bars or statistical uncertainties. Since the central claim is that the electric- and magnetic-field torques produce 'comparable' spin dynamics, the paper needs to report measurement statistics, fit uncertainties (especially for the null angle in Fig. 1c), and residuals for the linear fits in Fig. 1d, so that the allowed residual-H contamination can be assessed against the claimed precision.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (1), (14), (16)–(18)] Please define the L↑/L↓ sign convention for the ± and ∓ signs in these equations and check the sign chain between Eqs. (16) and (17), since the text currently requires the reader to infer the domain assignment.
  2. [After Eq. (18)] The statement that 'the combination l_y l_z ... behaves like mx' is compressed; an explicit two-line derivation would help the reader see why the domain-phase test is insensitive to whether the detected signal is m_x or l_y l_z.
  3. [Experimental setup] The number of averaged laser shots or measurement repeats used for each transient is not stated; please add this information to the Methods section.
  4. [Supplementary material / text] The main text refers to 'Supplementary Figure' and 'Supplementary Note' without numbering more than once; please itemize the supplementary material. Also, in the Experimental setup paragraph, 'polarizes' should be 'polarizers'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The qualitative electric-field excitation claim is independently supported by domain phase reversal and the alpha=-45-degree null, but the quantitative 'comparable torques' branch is self-referential: the THz magnetoelectric parameter is calibrated from the very equality it is used to confirm.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Theoretical model and simulations', text following Eq. (20)]
    "Expanding the definition of static magnetoelectric coefficient α⊥ (20) from static to THz case and considering the proximity of the magnetoelectric and Zeeman torques from Eq. (17) |ωAωME⊥ETHz x |≈| γωA H THz x |, we can estimate the THz parameters λTHz⊥κTHz⊥= H THz x /ETHz x≈−1, λTHz⊥≈−1.4, and αTHz⊥≈χTHz⊥≈−1.2 10−4."

    The THz magnetoelectric parameter is fixed by imposing that the magnetoelectric torque equals the Zeeman torque in magnitude, which is exactly the paper's headline quantitative claim of 'comparable effects'. With λTHz fixed this way, the subsequent numerical solution of Eqs. (14) that yields canting angles β≈0.0075° and ϑ1≈0.6° is a consistency check, not an independent prediction; it cannot confirm the equality of torques. The existence and sign of the electric-field torque are independently established by the domain-reversal phase flip and the α=-45° near-zero interference, but the quantitative comparison is calibrated from the data rather than predicted from first principles.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim — that 0.165 THz spin resonance in collinear Cr2O3 can be excited by the electric field of a THz pulse — does not reduce to a fit or to a self-citation chain. The key evidence is the π phase shift of the oscillations upon reversal of the Néel vector in the magnetoelectric geometry (Fig. 2c) and the near-zero amplitude at α=-45° with maximum at α=45° (Fig. 1c). These angular and domain-reversal controls are incompatible with a purely Zeeman drive and do not depend on any fitted parameter. The model in Eqs. (1)-(17) is a symmetry-based two-sublattice derivation with standard exchange, anisotropy, magnetoelectric, and Zeeman terms; its qualitative predictions — linear scaling, π phase shift on field rotation, and domain-dependent sign for the magnetoelectric torque — agree with experiment without adjustable parameters. No load-bearing self-citation was found: the static magnetoelectric coefficient, exchange and anisotropy frequencies, and linewidth are taken from independent literature (Refs. 28, 29, 46, etc.), and the cited author-overlapping works (Refs. 23-25, 34, 45) provide background or standard formalism rather than the uniqueness of the present mechanism. The one genuine circularity is in the quantitative branch: the THz magnetoelectric parameters are estimated by assuming the proximity of the magnetoelectric and Zeeman torques, which is the very conclusion the paper advertises as 'comparable effects'. The numerical estimates of spin-canting amplitudes that follow are therefore not independent validations of the amplitude comparison. This does not undermine the existence of the electric-field torque, but it means the quantitative 'comparable amplitudes' statement rests on the raw amplitude data and the assumed equality, not on a parameter-free prediction. Hence a moderate circularity score of 3 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the two-sublattice approximation, small-canting linearization, a symmetry-allowed linear magnetoelectric coupling term, and the assumption that the static α⊥ relation carries over to THz frequencies. The only free parameters that matter quantitatively are the magnetoelectric coupling constants; the THz value is calibrated from the observed amplitude ratio rather than independently measured. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • λ⊥κ⊥ (static magnetoelectric coupling parameter) = ≈ -0.8 (static), λ_THz⊥κ_THz⊥ ≈ -1
    Introduced in Eq. (10) for the E_x magnetoelectric interaction; related to the measurable static α⊥ through Eq. (20), with values from Refs. 28,29,46. The THz value is estimated from the observed comparability of torques, so it is not an independent input.
  • λ‖κ‖ (magnetoelectric coupling for E_y) = not determined
    Appears in Eq. (10), but the authors argue E_y internal parametric terms are negligible in the studied geometry, so it does not enter the central result quantitatively.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Two-sublattice approximation for Cr2O3 (four Cr3+ spins replaced by m_A and m_B)
    Invoked in Methods before Eq. (3); standard for AFM dynamics but a simplification of the four-sublattice structure.
  • domain assumption Small canting angles ǫ, β, ϑ1, ϕ1 justify linearization around ground state
    Expansions in Eqs. (5)-(6); valid only for small deviations, appropriate for the observed weak excitation.
  • domain assumption The linear magnetoelectric energy U_ME = -λ⊥κ⊥M0 m_x l_y E_x - λ‖κ‖M0 m_y l_y E_y is the symmetry-allowed E-spin coupling in Cr2O3
    Central to Eq. (1) and the magnetoelectric torque in Eq. (17); based on the magnetic point group 3m, cited to Refs. 28,35.
  • domain assumption The static magnetoelectric coefficient α⊥ remains valid at THz frequencies with the same relations α⊥=λ⊥κ⊥χ⊥
    The paper extends Eq. (20) from static to THz case without a direct THz measurement of α⊥, an untested assumption.
  • standard math For a freely propagating THz pulse, E_THz = c H_THz
    Used to relate E and H in the numerical model; standard for electromagnetic plane waves in vacuum in the units used.
  • domain assumption Magnon damping is negligible on the 100 ps timescale
    Based on linewidth Δω≈1.4 GHz from Ref. 46; used to drop damping from Eqs. (14).
  • standard math Berry phase kinetic energy T = M0/γ (ǫ ϕ̇1 + β ϑ̇1)
    Used to build the Lagrangian in Eq. (12); cited to Refs. 44,45.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of THz electric field control of spins in collinear antiferromagnet Cr$_{2}$O$_{3}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z4P6WDQ5

@misc{pith2026250210181,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: THz electric field control of spins in collinear antiferromagnet Cr$_2$O$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z4P6WDQ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10181}
}
abstract

The idea to find a magnet that responds to an electric field as efficiently as to its magnetic counterpart has long intrigued people's minds and recently became a cornerstone for future energy efficient and nano-scalable technologies for magnetic writing and information processing. In contrast to electric currents, a control by electric fields promises much lower dissipations and in contrast to magnetic fields, electric fields are easier to apply to a nanoscale bit. Recently, the idea to find materials and mechanisms facilitating a strong and simultaneously fast response of spins to electric field has fueled an intense research interest to electromagnons in non-collinear antiferromagnets. Here we show that THz spin resonance at the frequency 0.165 THz in collinear antiferromagnet Cr$_{2}$O$_{3}$, which does not host any electromagnons, can be excited by both THz magnetic and electric fields. The mechanisms result in comparable effects on spin dynamics, when excited by freely propagating electromagnetic wave, but have different dependencies on the orientation of the applied THz electric field and the antiferromagnetic N\'eel vector. Hence this discovery opens up new chapters in the research areas targeting to reveal novel principles for the fastest and energy efficient information processing - ultrafast magnetism, antiferromagnetic spintronics, and THz magnonics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10181 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The single-cycle THz pump pulse excites spin dynam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a Antiferromagnetic domain pattern of the Cr2O3 sample visualized be the technique of the second harmonic generation as described in Methods. The domains with mutually opposite antiferromagnetic Neel vectors ´ L↑ (blue) and L↓ (orange) are marked correspondingly. b The rhombohedral unit cell of Cr2O3 (only magnetic Cr3+ ions are shown) with antiferromagnetic do￾mains having opposite arrangement of spins and opposite… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a Terahertz pulse waveform and b corresponding normalized Fourier spectrum. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a THz pump induced probe polarization rotation measured at different temperatures in the Zeeman geometry HTHz ⊥ L (ETHz k L) in a single antiferromagnetic domain. b Fourier spectra of the waveforms from a. c Temperature dependence of the magnon frequency. 14 [PITH_FUL…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transient probe polarization rotation measured a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exciting terahertz magnons with amplitude modulated light: spin pumping, squeezed states, symmetry breaking and pattern formation

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Amplitude-modulated optical light can parametrically excite THz antiferromagnetic magnons, generating spin currents, squeezed magnon pairs, and ordered spin patterns.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Y ang, C.-J., Li, J., Fiebig, M., and Pal, S. (2023). T erahe rtz control of many- 329 body dynamics in quantum materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 518–532. URL: 330 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00566-w . doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00566-w . 331

    doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00566-w 2023

  2. [2]

    Mostovoy , M. (2024). Multiferroics: different routes to magnetoelectric coupling. 332 npj Spintronics 2, 18. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44306-024-00021-8 . 333 doi:10.1038/s44306-024-00021-8 . 334

    work page doi:10.1038/s44306-024-00021-8 2024

  3. [3]

    Hassanpour, E., Zemp, Y ., T okunaga, Y ., T aguchi, Y ., T okura, Y ., Lottermoser, T ., Fiebig, M., 335 and Weber, M. C. (2022). Magnetoelectric transfer of a domai n pattern. Science 377, 1109– 336

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    S., Kenzelmann, M., Hudl, M ., T oledano, P ., Honda, T ., 338 Kimura, T ., Ivanov, S

    Leo, N., Carolus, V ., White, J. S., Kenzelmann, M., Hudl, M ., T oledano, P ., Honda, T ., 338 Kimura, T ., Ivanov, S. A., Weil, M. et al. (2018). Magnetoele ctric inversion of domain 339 patterns. Nature 560, 466–470. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0432-4 . 340 doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0432-4 . 341

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0432-4 2018

  5. [5]

    Matsukura, F ., T okura, Y ., and Ohno, H. (2015). Control of magnetism by electric 342 fields. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 209–220. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.22. 343 doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.22. 344

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.22 2015

  6. [6]

    345 (2004)

    Lottermoser, T ., Lonkai, T ., Amann, U., Hohlwein, D., Ihr inger, J., and Fiebig, M. 345 (2004). Magnetic phase control by an electric field. Nature 430, 541–544. URL: 346 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02728. doi:10.1038/nature02728. 347

    doi:10.1038/nature02728 2004

  7. [7]

    , and Zhang, 348 Q

    Wu, F ., Bao, S., Zhou, J., Wang, Y ., Sun, J., Wen, J., Wan, Y . , and Zhang, 348 Q. (2023). Fluctuation-enhanced phonon magnetic moments i n a polar antiferromag- 349 net. Nat. Phys. 19, 1868–1875. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02210-4 . 350 doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02210-4 . 351

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02210-4 2023

  8. [8]

    Verseils, M., Hemme, P ., Bounoua, D., Cervasio, R., Brubach, J., Houver, S., Gallais, Y ., Sa- 352 cuto, A., Colson, D., Iijima, T . et al. (2023). Stabilizing e lectromagnons in CuO under pres- 353 sure. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 11. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-023-00542-1 . 354 doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00542-1 . 355

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00542-1 2023

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Masuda, R., Kaneko, Y ., T okura, Y ., and T akahashi, Y . (202 1). Electric field control 356 of natural optical activity in a multiferroic helimagnet. S cience 372, 496–500. URL: 357 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz4312. doi:10.1126/science.aaz4312. 358

    doi

  2. [10]

    M., and R ¨ uegg, C

    T ´oth, S., Wehinger, B., Rolfs, K., Birol, T ., Stuhr, U., T akat su, H., Kimura, 359 K., Kimura, T ., Rønnow, H. M., and R ¨ uegg, C. (2016). Electro magnon dispersion 360 probed by inelastic X-ray scattering in LiCrO2. Nat. Commun. 7, 13547. URL: 361 https://doi.org/10.1038...

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Jones, S. P . P ., Gaw, S. M., Doig, K. I., Prabhakaran, D., H ´etroy Wheeler, E. M., Boothroyd, 363 A. T ., and Lloyd-Hughes, J. (2014). High-temperature elect romagnons in the magnetically 364 induced multiferroic cupric oxide driven by intersublattice exchange. Nat. Commun....

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    A., Hoffmann, M

    Kubacka, T ., Johnson, J. A., Hoffmann, M. C., Vicario, C., De Jong, S., Beaud, P ., Gr ¨ ubel, S.,367 Huang, S.-W., Huber, L., Patthey , L. et al. (2014). Large-Am plitude Spin Dynamics Driven 368 16 by a THz Pulse in Resonance with an Electromagnon. Science 343, 1333–1336. U...

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Ivanov, V

    Pimenov, A., Mukhin, A. A., Ivanov, V . Y ., T ravkin, V . D., Balbashov, A. M., and Loidl, A. 371 (2006). Possible evidence for electromagnons in multiferr oic manganites. Nature Phys. 2, 372 97–100. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys212. doi:10.1038/nphys212. 373

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    Y ., Peng, X., Cheng, X., Vi ˜nas Bostr ¨om, E., Kim, D

    Gao, F . Y ., Peng, X., Cheng, X., Vi ˜nas Bostr ¨om, E., Kim, D. S., Jain, R. K., Vishnu, D., 374 Raju, K., Sankar, R., Lee, S.-F . et al. (2024). Giant chiral m agnetoelectric oscillations in a 375 van der Waals multiferroic. Nature. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-0...

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Han, J., Cheng, R., Liu, L., Ohno, H., and Fukami, S. (2023 ). Co- 378 herent antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Mater. 22, 684–695. URL: 379 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01492-6 . doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01492-6 . 380

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    N ˇemec, P ., Fiebig, M., Kampfrath, T ., and Kimel, A. V . (2018). Antiferromagnetic opto- 381 spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 229–241. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0051-x . 382 doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0051-x . 383

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Baltz, V ., Manchon, A., Tsoi, M., Moriyama, T ., Ono, T ., a nd 384 Tserkovnyak, Y . (2018). Antiferromagnetic spintronics. R ev. Mod. Phys. 90, 385 015005. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005. 386 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005. 387

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Jungwirth, T ., Marti, X., Wadley , P ., and Wunderlich, J. (2016). Antiferromagnetic spin- 388 tronics. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 231–241. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.18. 389 doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.18. 390

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    C., Lu, H.-Z., Bansil, A., Lin, H., Chang, T .-R., Zhou, B

    Qiu, J.-X., Tzschaschel, C., Ahn, J., Gao, A., Li, H., Zha ng, X.-Y ., Ghosh, B., Hu, C., Wang, 391 Y .-X., Liu, Y .-F ., B´erub ´e, D., Dinh, T ., Gong, Z., Lien, S.-W., Ho, S.-C., Singh, B., W atanabe, 392 K., T aniguchi, T ., Bell, D. C., Lu, H.-Z., Bansil, A., Lin, H., Cha...

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    A., Rangan, S ., Bartynski, R., 397 and Cheong, S.-W

    Du, K., Xu, X., Won, C., Wang, K., Crooker, S. A., Rangan, S ., Bartynski, R., 397 and Cheong, S.-W. (2023). T opological surface magnetism an d n ´eel vector con- 398 trol in a magnetoelectric antiferromagnet. npj Quantum Mat erials 8, 17. URL: 399 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Nori, F ., and Fiebig, M

    Satoh, T ., Cho, S.-J., Iida, R., Shimura, T ., Kuroda, K., Ueda, H., Ueda, Y ., 401 Ivanov, B. A., Nori, F ., and Fiebig, M. (2010). Spin Oscillat ions in Antiferro- 402 magnetic NiO T riggered by Circularly Polarized Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 403 077402. URL: https://link...

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Kampfrath, T ., Sell, A., Klatt, G., Pashkin, A., M ¨ahrlein, S., Dekorsy , T ., Wolf, M., Fiebig, 406 M., Leitenstorfer, A., and Huber, R. (2011). Coherent terah ertz control of antiferromagnetic 407 spin waves. Nat. Photon. 5, 31–34. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010...

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Zvezdin, A. K. (1979). Dynamics of domain walls in weak fe rromagnets. Pisma Zh. Exp. 410 T eor. Fiz.29, 605. 411 17

    1979

  16. [24]

    Zvezdin, A. K. (2017). Dynamics of domain walls in weak fe rromagnets. arXiv preprint 412 arXiv:1703.01502. 413

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A., Grishunin, K

    Mashkovich, E. A., Grishunin, K. A., Dubrovin, R. M., Zve zdin, A. K., Pisarev, R. V ., 414 and Kimel, A. V . (2021). T erahertz light–driven coupling of antiferromagnetic spins to 415 lattice. Science 374, 1608–1611. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk1121. 416 doi:10.11...

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    L., Bodnar, S

    Behovits, Y ., Chekhov, A. L., Bodnar, S. Y ., Gueckstock, O., Reimers, S., Lytvy- 418 nenko, Y ., Skourski, Y ., Wolf, M., Seifert, T . S., Gomonay , O ., Kl ¨aui, M., Jour- 419 dan, M., and Kampfrath, T . (2023). T erahertz n ´eel spin-orbit torques drive nonlinear 420 magno...

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Astrov, D. N. (1960). The magnetoelectric effect in anti ferromagnetics. Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 423 708–709. URL: http://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_011_03_0708.pdf. 424

    1960

  20. [28]

    Astrov, D. N. (1961). Magnetoelectric effect in chromiu m oxide. Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 729– 425

    1961

  21. [29]

    Foner, S. (1963). High-Field Antiferromagnetic Resona nce in Cr2O3. Phys. 427 Rev. 130, 183–197. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.130.183. 428 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.183. 429

    1963 doi

  22. [30]

    Alikhanov, R., Dimitrijevi ´c, ˇZ., Kowalska, A., Kra ´snicki, S., R˙ zany , H., T odorovi ´c, J., 430 and Wanic, A. (1969). Neutron Investigation of the Spin Syst em Dynamics in α-Cr2O3. 431 physica status solidi (b) 32, 41–48. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19690320105. 4...

    1969 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Hutchings, M

    Samuelsen, E. J., Hutchings, M. T ., and Shirane, G. (1970 ). Inelastic neutron scattering 434 investigation of spin waves and magnetic interactions in Cr2O3. Physica 48, 13–42. URL: 435 https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(70)90158-8 . doi:10.1016/0031-8914(70)90158-8 . 436

    1970 doi

  24. [32]

    Biao, D., Jun, C., Y uan-zhe, T ., Di, W., and Qi, Z. (2023). Low-Frequency 437 Raman Detection of Antiferromagnetic Spin Waves in Cr2O3. Prog. Phys. 438 43, 142–150. URL: https://doi.org/10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2023.05.002. 439 doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip.2023.05.002. 440

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    L., and Li, C

    Sun, Q., Wei, B., Su, Y ., Abernathy , D. L., and Li, C. (2024 ). 441 T emperature-dependent spin dynamics in Cr2O3. Phys. Rev. B 110, 442 064413. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064413. 443 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.064413. 444

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    K., Kimel, A

    Baierl, S., Hohenleutner, M., Kampfrath, T ., Zvezdin, A . K., Kimel, A. V ., Huber, R., 445 and Mikhaylovskiy , R. V . (2016). Nonlinear spin control by t erahertz-driven anisotropy 446 fields. Nat. Photon. 10, 715–718. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.181. 447 doi:10...

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    V ., Vorob’ev, G

    Belov, D. V ., Vorob’ev, G. P ., Kadomtseva, A. M., Popov, Y . F ., and Zvezdin, 449 A. K. (1993). Magnetoelectric effect in the spin-flop phase o f Cr2O3 and 450 the problem of determining the magnetic structure. JETP Let t. 58. URL: 451 http://jetpletters.ru/ps/1191/article_1...

    1993

  28. [36]

    Volger, J. (1952). Anomalous Specific Heat of Chromium Ox ide ( Cr2O3) at 453 the Antiferromagnetic Curie T emperature. Nature 170, 1027–1027. URL: 454 https://doi.org/10.1038/1701027a0. doi:10.1038/1701027a0. 455

    1952 doi

  29. [37]

    R., Scott, E

    McGuire, T . R., Scott, E. J., and Grannis, F . H. (1956). An tiferro- 456 magnetism in a Cr2O3 Crystal. Phys. Rev. 102, 1000–1003. URL: 457 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.102.1000. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.1000. 458

    1956 doi

  30. [38]

    Brockhouse, B. N. (1953). Antiferromagnetic structure in Cr2O3. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 961– 459

    1953

  31. [39]

    M., Hastings, J

    Corliss, L. M., Hastings, J. M., Nathans, R., and Shirane , G. (1965). Magnetic structure 461 of Cr2O3. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1099–1100. URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714118. 462 doi:10.1063/1.1714118. 463

    1965 doi

  32. [40]

    A., Urr u, A., Verbeek, 464 X

    Bousquet, E., Leli `evre-Berna, E., Qureshi, N., Soh, J.-R., Spaldin, N. A., Urr u, A., Verbeek, 464 X. H., and Weber, S. F . (2024). On the sign of the linear magnetoelectric coefficient in Cr2O3. 465 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 36, 155701. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. (1960). On the magneto-electrica l effects in antiferromagnets. Sov. 468 Phys. JETP 10, 628–629. doi: http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_010_03_0628.pdf. 469

    1960

  34. [42]

    L, G., and Pisarev, R

    Fiebig, M., Fr ¨ohlich, D., Sluyterman v. L, G., and Pisarev, R. V . (1995). Do main topography 470 of antiferromagnetic Cr2O3 by second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2906– 471

    1995

  35. [43]

    A., Kolchanov, A

    T urov, E. A., Kolchanov, A. V ., Menshenin, V . V ., Mirsaev, I. F ., and Nikolaev, V . V . (2001). 473 Symmetry and Physical Properties of Antiferromagnets. Fiz matlit, Moscow. 474

    2001

  36. [44]

    Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics

    Fradkin, E. Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press 475 (2013). 476

    2013

  37. [45]

    K., Dubrovin, R

    Zvezdin, A. K., Dubrovin, R. M., and Kimel, A. V . (2024). G iant Parametric Amplification of 477 the Inverse Cotton–Mouton Effect in Antiferromagnetic Cry stals. JETP Lett. 119, 363–371. 478 URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364023604050. doi:10.1134/S0021364023604050. 479

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    A., T ravkin, V

    Mukhin, A. A., T ravkin, V . D., and Lebedev, S. P . (1997). BWO quasi-optical spectroscopy of 480 Cr2O3: Gyrotropic birefringence at antiferromagnetic resonanc e. Ferroelectrics 204, 261– 481

    1997

  39. [47]

    Birss, R. R. et al. Symmetry and magnetism vol. 863. North -Holland Amsterdam (1964). 483 19

    1964

  40. [267]

    doi:10.1080/00150199708222206. 482

    doi

  41. [733]

    URL: http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_013_04_0729.pdf. 426

  42. [962]

    doi:10.1063/1.1699098

    URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699098. doi:10.1063/1.1699098. 460

    doi

  43. [1112]

    doi:10.1126/science.abm3058

    URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm3058. doi:10.1126/science.abm3058. 337

    doi

  44. [2908]

    doi:10.1063/1.113699

    URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.113699. doi:10.1063/1.113699. 472

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.