Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Computational Tractability of the (Many) Shapley Values

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12295 v1 pith:5FUXRCI3 submitted 2025-02-17 cs.LG cs.CCcs.LO

classification cs.LGcs.CCcs.LO
keywords shapcomplexitycomputingdistributionsshapleyvariantsbaselinecomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have examined the computational complexity of computing Shapley additive explanations (also known as SHAP) across various models and distributions, revealing their tractability or intractability in different settings. However, these studies primarily focused on a specific variant called Conditional SHAP, though many other variants exist and address different limitations. In this work, we analyze the complexity of computing a much broader range of such variants, including Conditional, Interventional, and Baseline SHAP, while exploring both local and global computations. We show that both local and global Interventional and Baseline SHAP can be computed in polynomial time for various ML models under Hidden Markov Model distributions, extending popular algorithms such as TreeSHAP beyond empirical distributions. On the downside, we prove intractability results for these variants over a wide range of neural networks and tree ensembles. We believe that our results emphasize the intricate diversity of computing Shapley values, demonstrating how their complexity is substantially shaped by both the specific SHAP variant, the model type, and the distribution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SST trains models to produce concise sufficient reasons as an extra output, yielding faster and often smaller explanations than post-hoc methods like Anchors and SIS.

Pith tools