Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparative study of the ans\"atze in quantum language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.20744 v1 pith:3URQIOFG submitted 2025-02-28 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords modelsquantumlanguageqnlpatzemethodsperformanceclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum language models are the alternative to classical language models, which borrow concepts and methods from quantum machine learning and computational linguistics. While several quantum natural language processing (QNLP) methods and frameworks exist for text classification and generation, there is a lack of systematic study to compare the performance across various ans\"atze, in terms of their hyperparameters and classical and quantum methods to implement them. Here, we evaluate the performance of quantum natural language processing models based on these ans\"atze at different levels in text classification tasks. We perform a comparative study and optimize the QNLP models by fine-tuning several critical hyperparameters. Our results demonstrate how the balance between simplification and expressivity affects model performance. This study provides extensive data to improve our understanding of QNLP models and opens the possibility of developing better QNLP algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum and Hybrid Machine-Learning Models for Materials-Science Tasks

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    QSVM and hybrid QNN models achieve around 90% validation accuracy on Mg stacking fault energy tasks, using a small dataset and no classical baseline.

Pith tools