Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10537 v2 pith:7MONRX5X submitted 2025-03-13 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords structuredadagradanalysisoptimizationpreconditionersdiagonalfull-matrixless
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a novel unified analysis for a broad class of adaptive optimization algorithms with structured (e.g., layerwise, diagonal, and kronecker-factored) preconditioners for both online regret minimization and offline convex optimization. Our analysis not only provides matching rate to several important structured preconditioned algorithms including diagonal AdaGrad, full-matrix AdaGrad, and AdaGrad-Norm, but also gives an improved convergence rate for a one-sided variant of Shampoo over that of original Shampoo. Interestingly, more structured preconditioners (e.g., diagonal Adagrad, AdaGrad-Norm which use less space and compute) are often presented as computationally efficient approximations to full-matrix Adagrad, aiming for improved optimization performance through better approximations. Our unified analysis challenges this prevailing view and reveals, perhaps surprisingly, that more structured preconditioners, despite using less space and computation per step, can outperform their less structured counterparts. To demonstrate this, we show that one-sided Shampoo, which is relatively much cheaper than full-matrix AdaGrad could outperform it both theoretically and experimentally.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SGD with Adaptive Preconditioning: Unified Analysis and Momentum Acceleration

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A single proof unifies convergence analyses of AdaGrad-Norm, AdaGrad, ASGO, and DASGO under Hölder smoothness, and shows AdaGrad/DASGO can be accelerated with Nesterov momentum.

  2. On the Convergence Analysis of Muon

    stat.ML 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Muon's convergence rate depends on an average Hessian curvature along its update directions, which can be much smaller than the worst-case Lipschitz constant when Hessians are low-rank.

  3. Non-Euclidean SGD for Structured Optimization: Unified Analysis and Improved Rates

    math.OC 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Non-Euclidean SGD variants (SignSGD, Muon) provably match adaptive optimizers' convergence rates under structured smoothness and noise assumptions.

  4. AdaGrad Meets Muon: Adaptive Stepsizes for Orthogonal Updates

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes AdaGO, a Muon variant with a scalar AdaGrad-Norm step size, and proves optimal nonconvex convergence rates while reporting empirical gains on regression and CIFAR-10.

Pith tools