REVIEW 2 cited by
Relational Supersymmetry via the Dressing Field Method and Matter-Interaction Supergeometric Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Relationality is the paradigmatic conceptual core of general-relativistic gauge field theory. It can be made manifest via the Dressing Field Method (DFM) of symmetry reduction, a systematic tool to achieve gauge-invariance by extracting the physical degrees of freedom representing relations among field variables. We review and further expand on some applications of the DFM to the very foundations of the supersymmetric framework, where it allows to build relational supersymmetric field theory and (dis)solves crucial issues. Furthermore, we elaborate on a novel approach within the relational supersymmetric field theory framework giving a unified description of fermionic matter fields and bosonic gauge fields, and thus close to Berezin's original motivation for the introduction of supergeometry in fundamental physics: a Matter-Interaction Supergeometric Unification (MISU). This new approach stands irrespective from the ultimate empirical status of standard supersymmetric field theory, about which it is agnostic.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Reassessing the foundations of Metric-Affine Gravity
Applying the Dressing Field Method to Metric-Affine Gravity shows that after eliminating gauge translations, the resulting kinematics reduces to Cartan-geometric kinematics with residual GL(n) symmetry.
-
What Price Fiber Bundle Substantivalism? On How to Avoid Holes in Fibers
Using the Dressing Field Method to build invariant variables, the paper argues that a relationalized fiber bundle substantivalism avoids the generalized hole argument.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.