REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty-aware waveform modeling for high signal-to-noise ratio gravitational-wave inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Semi-analytical waveform models for black hole binaries require calibration against numerical relativity waveforms to accurately represent the late inspiral and merger, where analytical approximations fail. After the fitting coefficients contained in the model are optimized, they are typically held fixed when the model is used to infer astrophysical parameters from real gravitational-wave data. Though point estimates for the fitting parameters are adequate for most applications, they provide an incomplete description of the fit, as they do not account for either the quality of the fit or the intrinsic uncertainties in the numerical relativity data. Using the IMRPhenomD model, we illustrate how to propagate these uncertainties into the inference by sampling the fitting coefficients from a prior distribution and marginalizing over them. The prior distribution is constructed by ensuring that the model is compatible with a training set of numerical relativity surrogates, within a predefined mismatch threshold. This approach demonstrates a pathway to mitigate systematic bias in high signal-to-noise events, particularly when envisioned for the next generation of semi-analytical models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Impact of numerical-relativity waveform calibration on parametrized post-Einsteinian tests
NR late-inspiral calibration systematics in IMRPhenomD produce false ppE GR violations at O5 SNRs ≳60; an uncertainty-aware baseline restores consistency with GR up to SNR 330.
-
A comprehensive look into the accuracy of SpEC binary black hole waveforms
Simulated black-hole merger waveforms accumulate numerical error over time, but the merger stage is not intrinsically less accurate once aligned on its own, and resolution-exchanged differences show no systematic bias...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.