Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Refined Quantum Algorithms for Principal Component Analysis and Solving Linear System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00833 v1 pith:2Z4C65U4 submitted 2025-04-01 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords algorithmsquantumlinearaccessanalysisclassicalcomponentkappa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We outline refined versions of two major quantum algorithms for performing principal component analysis and solving linear equations. Our methods are exponentially faster than their classical counterparts and even previous quantum algorithms/dequantization algorithms. Oracle/black-box access to classical data is not required, thus implying great capacity for near-term realization. Several applications and implications of these results are discussed. First, we show that a Hamiltonian $H$ with classically known rows/columns can be efficiently simulated, adding another model in addition to the well-known sparse access and linear combination of unitaries models. Second, we provide a simpler proof of the known result that quantum matrix inversion cannot achieve sublinear complexity $\kappa^{1-\gamma}$ where $\kappa$ is the conditional number of the inverted matrix.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Algorithm for Estimating Intrinsic Geometry

    quant-ph 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A quantum algorithm for local dimension and curvature estimation is proposed, but the claimed exponential speedup rests on unproven spectral-gap assumptions and an incorrect least-squares derivation.

Pith tools