Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00874 v1 pith:4M4RNE7Q submitted 2025-04-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords auditingdatap2niaapisauditorcollaborationfairnessissues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of AI legislation has increased the need to assess the ethical compliance of high-risk AI systems. Traditional auditing methods rely on platforms' application programming interfaces (APIs), where responses to queries are examined through the lens of fairness requirements. However, such approaches put a significant burden on platforms, as they are forced to maintain APIs while ensuring privacy, facing the possibility of data leaks. This lack of proper collaboration between the two parties, in turn, causes a significant challenge to the auditor, who is subject to estimation bias as they are unaware of the data distribution of the platform. To address these two issues, we present P2NIA, a novel auditing scheme that proposes a mutually beneficial collaboration for both the auditor and the platform. Extensive experiments demonstrate P2NIA's effectiveness in addressing both issues. In summary, our work introduces a privacy-preserving and non-iterative audit scheme that enhances fairness assessments using synthetic or local data, avoiding the challenges associated with traditional API-based audits.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification

    cs.CR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Certifying a model only on a fixed audit dataset is vulnerable to data-forging; committing before sampling fresh audit data restores distributional security.

Pith tools