Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

dSphobic Dark Matter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-state dark matter model with velocity-dependent upscattering can produce a Galactic Center gamma-ray signal while suppressing dwarf galaxy signals, breaking the usual correlation between the two.

desk verdict Solid model-building that plausibly breaks the GCE–dSph correlation, but the advertised parameter window is exponentially sensitive to an unquantified Maxwell–Boltzmann approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12372 v1 pith:CIOXKWBN submitted 2025-04-16 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Asher Berlin , Joshua W. Foster , Dan Hooper , Gordan Krnjaic This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords darkmatterdetectionexcitedindirectparticlesstatedwarf
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Most dark matter models predict that the same annihilation process that could explain a gamma-ray glow at the Galactic Center should also produce gamma rays from the Milky Way's dwarf satellite galaxies. Dwarf galaxies are almost pure dark matter and have little background, so they are considered a decisive test. This paper constructs a model that evades that test. The dark matter is made of two particle states with slightly different masses. Annihilation only works when one heavy particle meets one light particle. In a high-velocity environment like the Milky Way halo, a light particle can be kicked into the heavy state by scattering, so the co-annihilation proceeds and gamma rays are produced. In dwarf galaxies, the dark matter moves about a thousand times slower, too slowly to climb the small mass gap, so almost no heavy states are formed and the gamma-ray signal is suppressed by orders of magnitude. The authors build a full particle physics model with two mediator particles, compute the cosmological history, and calculate the resulting gamma-ray flux suppression for the Milky Way and for a Draco-like dwarf. The central figure shows that for mass splittings around 10^-7 to 10^-6 of the dark matter mass, the Milky Way signal is near the standard thermal relic level while the dwarf signal is suppressed by factors of 10^-3 to 10^-6. The main caveat is that the result depends on the exact velocity distribution of dark matter and on choosing a large dark matter coupling to the light mediator.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a range of model parameters, these dynamics predict a detectable DM coannihilation signal from the Galactic Center, at a level comparable to that expected from DM in the form of a standard thermal relic with a velocity-independent annihilation cross section, while suppressing any corresponding signal from dwarf galaxies (abstract and Sec. V). If this is correct, a null dwarf gamma-ray observation does not rule out a dark matter interpretation of the Galactic Center excess.

Load-bearing premise

The upscattering rate that regenerates the excited state is computed assuming the dark matter phase space is a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with effective temperature Tχ = mχ⟨v²⟩/3, and that upscattered particles remain at a fixed radius. The exponential factor e^{-2δχ/Tχ} in Eq. (25) makes the Galactic Center signal and dwarf suppression exponentially sensitive to this assumption: any non-thermal high-velocity tail, velocity anisotropy, or radial diffusion would shift the boundary between allowed and excluded mass splittings by orders of magnitude. This enters in Sec. IV after Eq. (25) and in Sec. V where Tχ is set by ⟨v²⟩.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a two-state inelastic dark matter model, termed 'dSphobic' dark matter, in which coannihilations of a ground state χ1 and a slightly heavier excited state χ2 generate gamma rays only when a late-time χ2 population is regenerated by χ1χ1→χ2χ2 upscattering. Because upscattering is kinematically suppressed in low-velocity dwarf spheroidal halos, the model predicts a Galactic Center (or cluster) annihilation signal comparable to a standard thermal relic while suppressing dwarf galaxy signals. The authors provide a concrete 2HDM+singlet realization, compute the cosmological depletion of the primordial χ2 abundance via downscattering, solve Boltzmann equations for the late-time regeneration of χ2 using an effective Maxwell-Boltzmann temperature, and evaluate J-factors for the Milky Way and Draco-like dwarfs using Eddington-inverted velocity distributions. They conclude that for δχ/mχ ~ 10^-8–10^-6 the usual correlation between Galactic Center and dwarf gamma-ray signals is broken, complicating dwarf-based tests of the Galactic Center excess interpretation.

Significance. If correct, the mechanism would be phenomenologically important: it would show that a null dwarf gamma-ray observation does not exclude a dark matter interpretation of the Galactic Center excess, directly affecting the interpretation of Fermi-LAT and next-generation searches. The paper's strengths are its complete model construction with explicit benchmarks and constraints (direct detection, decays, ΔNeff), its careful treatment of early-universe downscattering with Sommerfeld enhancement, its use of realistic Eddington-inverted velocity distributions, and its honest discussion of the fixed-radius and revirialization approximations in Appendix C. The main weakness is that the late-time upscattering rate, which controls the central prediction, is evaluated through a Maxwell-Boltzmann approximation whose exponential sensitivity is acknowledged but not quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (25); Sec. V after Eq. (32)] The central claim rests on Eq. (25), where the late-time upscattering rate is written as Γ = (ρχ/mχ)e^{-2δχ/Tχ}⟨σv⟩ with Tχ = mχ⟨v²⟩/3, rather than on a direct phase-space integral over the Eddington-inverted f(v,r) obtained in Eq. (32). The exponential e^{-2δχ/Tχ} is exponentially sensitive to the high-velocity tail: for the advertised window δχ/mχ ~ 10^-8–10^-6 and MW ⟨v²⟩ ~ 10^-6, the exponent ranges from ~0.06 to ~6, so a Maxwellian calibrated only to ⟨v²⟩ can over- or underestimate the fraction of pairs above the 2δχ threshold by orders of magnitude, and anisotropy or a truncated distribution changes the result further. Since this controls both the Milky Way enhancement and the dwarf suppression shown in Fig. 6, I request a direct computation of Γ_{χ1χ1→χ2χ2} from the phase-space integral over f(v1)f(v2)σ_up v_rel and an uncertainty band on Fig. 6; until this is quantified, the advertised parameter window is not fully demonstrated.
  2. [Sec. V, fixed-radius treatment; Appendix C, Fig. 7] The dwarf-suppression leg of the claim is also sensitive to the treatment of radial transport. In Sec. V the authors assume that regenerated χ2 particles remain at a fixed radius, while Appendix C replaces this with a δχ-dependent revirialization prescription when upscattering is slow. Figure 7 shows that these choices shift the dwarf Jχ/J0 by orders of magnitude, and that including scattering between dwarf and Milky Way populations raises the dwarf signal substantially. The manuscript states the revirialization criterion but does not derive it from a comparison of the orbital-mixing timescale with the upscattering and coannihilation timescales. I recommend either providing such a dynamical derivation or quoting the dwarf Jχ/J0 as a conservative envelope over the range of assumptions, because the central claim requires both efficient Milky Way upscattering and strong dwarf suppression.
  3. [Sec. IV, SIDM discussion; Appendix B, Eq. (B2)] The statement that σV/mχ ≲ few cm²/g and hence consistent with SIDM constraints should be quantified for the benchmark parameters used in Fig. 6. Evaluating Eq. (B2) with y'_χ = y'_χ^max and δχ/mχ ~ 10^-8 gives σV/mχ of order tens of cm²/g at Milky Way velocities (v ~ 7×10^-4), which appears to be in tension with galactic-scale SIDM limits. Since Fig. 6 is generated with y'_χ = y'_χ^max, this could affect the allowed parameter range for the strongest dSphobic benchmark; a quantitative SIDM constraint scan should accompany the revised manuscript.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I and Sec. III A] There are typographical errors such as 'enviroments' in Sec. I and 'indirect direction signal' in Sec. III A; a proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Sec. III C, Eq. (24)] The condition for efficient primordial depletion is stated without showing the intermediate algebra connecting Eq. (21) to the Hubble rate; adding one or two lines of derivation would help readers verify the y'_χ scaling.
  3. [Sec. IV, Eq. (26)] The exponent in Eq. (26) is written as e^{δχ/3Tχ}, which is easy to confuse with the e^{-2δχ/Tχ} factor in Eq. (25); please clarify the step-by-step derivation of this condition.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says the black curves are defined using the initial primordial values before late-time upscattering, which is clear, but the ordering of the curves between the two panels is difficult to read; aligning the legend with the curves would improve clarity.
  5. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The final exponential factor in the second line of Eq. (C1) is introduced ad hoc; a short parenthetical derivation or reference would improve readability.
Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The model's central claim rests on a set of benchmark parameters chosen by hand (mχ, ma, θ, tanβ, mφ/δχ, y'_χ) and on the scanned mass splitting δχ/mχ. These are not fitted to the gamma-ray signal; they define the model space. The derivation assumes standard thermal freeze-out, Maxwell-Boltzmann halo velocity distributions, and specific halo profiles, all flagged in the text but not stress-tested.

free parameters (7)
  • mχ = 50 GeV
    Chosen as benchmark dark matter mass, motivated by the Galactic Center excess interpretation; not derived from the model.
  • ma = 150 GeV
    Benchmark pseudoscalar mediator mass; chosen with θ=0.1 and tanβ=10 to give perturbative couplings and evade B-meson constraints.
  • θ = 0.1
    Mixing angle between the singlet and 2HDM pseudoscalars; near the limit from B-meson decays (θ≲0.1).
  • tanβ = 10
    Ratio of Higgs doublet vevs; within LHC constraints on A0→τ+τ− and perturbativity of bottom Yukawa.
  • mφ/δχ = 3
    Chosen so that χ2→χ1φ decay is kinematically closed, keeping χ2 cosmologically long-lived.
  • y'_χ = y'_max ≈ 0.14
    DM coupling to the light scalar; set at the maximal value consistent with the requirement that χχ→φφ does not alter freeze-out, maximizing the late-time upscattering rate.
  • δχ/mχ = scanned; benchmark ~1e-8 to 3e-7
    Mass splitting is a free parameter; the mechanism operates in the window v^2_dSph≪δχ/mχ≪v^2_MW. It is not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dark matter is a thermal relic produced by freeze-out via χ1χ2 coannihilation to SM fermions.
    Sec. III A assumes standard thermal WIMP production and uses the measured relic density to fix yχ.
  • domain assumption The DM velocity distributions in the Milky Way and dwarf galaxies are Maxwell-Boltzmann with effective temperature Tχ=mχ⟨v²⟩/3.
    Used in Sec. IV Eq. 25 to compute upscattering via detailed balance; exponentially sensitive to Tχ.
  • ad hoc to paper The light scalar φ is decoupled from the SM and acts as radiation with ΔNeff≈0.04.
    Sec. III B assumes φ couples only to the dark sector and decouples before QCD entropy transfer; no SM coupling is introduced.
  • domain assumption The halo density profiles (NFW for the Milky Way; cored, tidally stripped NFW for dwarfs) and their parameters describe the actual DM distribution.
    Sec. V uses profiles from Refs. [7,59] to compute J-factors; systematic halo uncertainties are not propagated.
  • ad hoc to paper χ2 particles produced by upscattering remain at a fixed galactocentric radius (or revirialize under stated criteria).
    Sec. V and Appendix C: the Boltzmann equations are evaluated per radius without diffusion; revirialization is modeled by two limiting cases.
invented entities (3)
  • χ1 and χ2: nearly-degenerate Majorana fermion pair (the dark matter) independent evidence
    purpose: Ground and excited dark matter states; coannihilation of the pair produces gamma rays, and upscattering of χ1 to χ2 enables the signal in high-velocity halos.
    The model predicts a GC gamma-ray flux at the thermal-relic level and suppressed dwarf flux, a falsifiable pattern; direct detection cross section ~1e-48 cm² is also predicted.
  • Light pseudoscalar a (mass 150 GeV) from singlet+2HDM mixing
    purpose: Mediates χ1χ2→ff̄ coannihilation; couples to b quarks and taus with strength θ tanβ mf/vh.
    No observation motivates this particle; it is a building block, though B-meson and collider constraints limit θ.
  • Light scalar φ (mass 3δχ, sub-MeV to keV)
    purpose: Mediates χ1χ1↔χ2χ2 upscattering/downscattering; no tree-level SM coupling.
    Pulled in to make upscattering efficient at weak-scale masses; only indirect effects (self-interactions, ΔNeff≈0.04) are predicted and are within current bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of dSphobic Dark Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CIOXKWBN

@misc{pith2026250412372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: dSphobic Dark Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CIOXKWBN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12372}
}
read the original abstract

We present a mechanism that allows thermal relic dark matter to annihilate efficiently in the Galactic Halo and in galaxy clusters, but not in the lower-velocity environments of dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies. We realize this within a complete model in which the dark matter consists of two distinct states separated by a small mass splitting. An indirect detection signal is generated only through the coannihilations of these two states, requiring both to be present. In the halo of the Milky Way, the dark matter particles in the lighter state can be excited into the long-lived heavier state through scattering. Once excited, these heavier particles can coannihilate with those in the lighter state, yielding a gamma-ray signal with little or no suppression. By contrast, the dark matter particles in dwarf galaxies do not possess enough kinetic energy to be excited, thereby suppressing the coannihilation rate and corresponding indirect detection signals from those systems. This framework breaks the predictive relationship that ordinarily exists between these respective gamma-ray signals and complicates our ability to interpret the results of indirect detection searches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12372 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The primordial χ2 fraction, fχ2 ≡ nχ2 /(nχ1 + nχ2 ), as a function of y ′ χ, normalized by y ′ max χ (see Eq. 18), for the model parameters given in Table I, and for various choices of the dark matter mass splitting, δχ. amount of momentum, and is regulated by the φ mass, saturating if the mass exceeds the minimum momentum transfer, mφ ≳ δχ/v. This downscattering process decouples once the rate described in Eq. 21 f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The product of fractional abundances, fχi ≡ nχi /(nχ1 +nχ2 ), plotted against the dark matter fractional mass splitting, δχ/mχ, for representative density and velocity parameters in dwarf galaxies, the Milky Way, and galaxy clusters. In particular, we adopt a dark matter mass density of ρχ = 1 GeV/cm3 and dark matter temperatures, Tχ = 10−5 mχ/3, Tχ = 10−6 mχ/3, and Tχ = 10−9 mχ/3, corresponding to those found in ga… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The mean square velocity of the dark matter in the halo of the Milky Way (left panel) and in the Draco dwarf galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The quantity 4fχ1 fχ2 for the Milky Way, where fχi ≡ nχi /(nχ1 + nχ2 ), as a function of galactocentric radius, for several values of the dark matter’s fractional mass splitting, δχ/mχ, and for the model parameters given in Table I. We have further adopted y ′ χ = y ′ …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The suppression in the effective dark matter annihilation rate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: As in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Galactic Center gamma-ray excess from a generic triaxial halo

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fermi-LAT fits show the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess keeps its spectrum and cuspiness under triaxial/tilted dark matter halo templates, but its morphology prefers a flipped-tilt halo and disfavors a stellar-halo profile.

  2. Cosmic-ray boosted inelastic dark matter from neutrino-emitting active galactic nuclei

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A cosmic-ray boosted, inelastic dark matter flux from two neutrino-emitting AGNs gives new Super-K and XENONnT limits that reach part of the thermal freeze-out target for sub-GeV dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [43]

    X-ray line from exciting dark matter,

    D. P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, “X-ray line from exciting dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 8, (2016) 083002, arXiv:1402.6671 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [1]

    The mass terms for these spinors are described by the Lagrangian, −L⊃ M 2 (χχ +χcχc) +mχχc + h.c., (5) where M and m are Majorana and Dirac masses, respectively

    Mass Spectrum To generate masses for the χ1 and χ2, we introduce a pair of singlet Weyl spinors, χ and χc, and impose upon the theory a charge-conjugation symmetry,Cχ, under which χ↔χc, as well as an approximate Z2× Zc 2 symmetry under whichχ and χc separately transform as χ→−χ and χc→−χc. The mass terms for these spinors are described by the Lagrangian, ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Since a0 is also odd under parity, the only allowed coupling betweena0 and the DM sector is L⊃−iyχ 2 a0 χχ−χcχc + h.c

    Coannihilation Interaction To obtain the interactions of the pseudoscalar mediator, we begin by introducing a gauge singlet pseudoscalar, a0, that is odd under the Cχ symmetry introduced above. Since a0 is also odd under parity, the only allowed coupling betweena0 and the DM sector is L⊃−iyχ 2 a0 χχ−χcχc + h.c. (7) When written in terms of the mass eigens...

    work page

  4. [3]

    revirialize,

    Scattering Interaction As mentioned above, efficiently upscattering DM in the Galactic Halo will require us to introduce a second mediator, φ, which is much lighter than the pseudoscalar, a. We parameterize the interactions of this light scalar as follows: L⊃y′ χφ ¯χ1χ2 +··· . (14) 3 Note that a term of the form a2 0|Φu,d|2 is also allowed, but has no phe...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,

    G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506, arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [5]

    Fermi-LAT Observations of High-Energy γ-Ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center,

    F ermi-LA TCollaboration, M. Ajello et al. , “Fermi-LAT Observations of High-Energy γ-Ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center,” Astrophys. J. 819 no. 1, (2016) 44, arXiv:1511.02938 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [6]

    The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter,

    F ermi-LA TCollaboration, M. Ackermann et al. , “The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter,” Astrophys. J. 840 no. 1, (2017) 43, arXiv:1704.03910 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    Constraints on the Galactic Halo Dark Matter from Fermi-LAT Diffuse Measurements,

    F ermi-LA TCollaboration, M. Ackermann et al. , “Constraints on the Galactic Halo Dark Matter from Fermi-LAT Diffuse Measurements,” Astrophys. J. 761 (2012) 91, arXiv:1205.6474 [astro-ph.CO] . 20

    arXiv 2012

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications,

    F ermi-LA TCollaboration, M. Ackermann et al. , “Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 082002, arXiv:1305.5597 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data,

    A. McDaniel, M. Ajello, C. M. Karwin, M. Di Mauro, A. Drlica-Wagner, and M. A. S´ anchez-Conde, “Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 6, (2024) 063024, arXiv:2311.04982 [...

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Investigating the effect of Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies extension on dark matter searches with Fermi-LAT data,

    M. Di Mauro, M. Stref, and F. Calore, “Investigating the effect of Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies extension on dark matter searches with Fermi-LAT data,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 123032, arXiv:2212.06850 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    New Limits on Dark Matter Annihilation from AMS Cosmic Ray Positron Data,

    L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, I. Cholis, D. Hooper, and C. Weniger, “New Limits on Dark Matter Annihilation from AMS Cosmic Ray Positron Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171101, arXiv:1306.3983 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [12]

    AMS-02 antiprotons and dark matter: Trimmed hints and robust bounds,

    F. Calore, M. Cirelli, L. Derome, Y. Genolini, D. Maurin, P. Salati, and P. D. Serpico, “AMS-02 antiprotons and dark matter: Trimmed hints and robust bounds,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 5, (2022) 163, arXiv:2202.03076 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Novel Dark Matter Constraints from Antiprotons in Light of AMS-02,

    A. Cuoco, M. Kr¨ amer, and M. Korsmeier, “Novel Dark Matter Constraints from Antiprotons in Light of AMS-02,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 19, (2017) 191102, arXiv:1610.03071 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Possible dark matter annihilation signal in the AMS-02 antiproton data,

    M.-Y. Cui, Q. Yuan, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and Y.-Z. Fan, “Possible dark matter annihilation signal in the AMS-02 antiproton data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 19, (2017) 191101, arXiv:1610.03840 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [15]

    A Robust Excess in the Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spectrum: Implications for Annihilating Dark Matter,

    I. Cholis, T. Linden, and D. Hooper, “A Robust Excess in the Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spectrum: Implications for Annihilating Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 10, (2019) 103026, arXiv:1903.02549 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Cosmic-ray propagation models elucidate the prospects for antinuclei detection,

    P. De La Torre Luque, M. W. Winkler, and T. Linden, “Cosmic-ray propagation models elucidate the prospects for antinuclei detection,” JCAP 10 (2024) 017, arXiv:2404.13114 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Cosmic ray antihelium from a strongly coupled dark sector,

    M. W. Winkler, P. De La Torre Luque, and T. Linden, “Cosmic ray antihelium from a strongly coupled dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 123035, arXiv:2211.00025 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Antideuterons and antihelium nuclei from annihilating dark matter,

    I. Cholis, T. Linden, and D. Hooper, “Antideuterons and antihelium nuclei from annihilating dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 10, (2020) 103019, arXiv:2001.08749 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, “Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1719–1722, arXiv:astro-ph/9906391

    1999 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Possible Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation In The Inner Milky Way From The Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,

    L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, “Possible Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation In The Inner Milky Way From The Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,” arXiv:0910.2998 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,

    D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, “Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,” Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 412–428, arXiv:1010.2752 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [22]

    On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center,

    D. Hooper and T. Linden, “On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 123005, arXiv:1110.0006 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Detection of a Gamma-Ray Source in the Galactic Center Consistent with Extended Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation and Concentrated Astrophysical Emission,

    K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, “Detection of a Gamma-Ray Source in the Galactic Center Consistent with Extended Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation and Concentrated Astrophysical Emission,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083511, arXiv:1207.6047 [astro-ph.HE] . [Erratum: Phys.Re...

    2012 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Two Emission Mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A Possible Signal of Annihilating Dark Matter,

    D. Hooper and T. R. Slatyer, “Two Emission Mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A Possible Signal of Annihilating Dark Matter,” Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 118–138, arXiv:1302.6589 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Dark Matter and Pulsar Model Constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT Gamma Ray Observations,

    C. Gordon and O. Macias, “Dark Matter and Pulsar Model Constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT Gamma Ray Observations,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 8, (2013) 083521, arXiv:1306.5725 [astro-ph.HE] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 049901 (2014)]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [26]

    The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter,

    T. Daylan, D. P. Finkbeiner, D. Hooper, T. Linden, S. K. N. Portillo, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, “The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter,” Phys. Dark Univ. 12 (2016) 1–23, arXiv:1402.6703 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Background Model Systematics for the Fermi GeV Excess,

    F. Calore, I. Cholis, and C. Weniger, “Background Model Systematics for the Fermi GeV Excess,” JCAP 03 (2015) 038, arXiv:1409.0042 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Return of the templates: Revisiting the Galactic Center excess with multimessenger observations,

    I. Cholis, Y.-M. Zhong, S. D. McDermott, and J. P. Surdutovich, “Return of the templates: Revisiting the Galactic Center excess with multimessenger observations,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 10, (2022) 103023, arXiv:2112.09706 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Characteristics of the Galactic Center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi -LAT data,

    M. Di Mauro, “Characteristics of the Galactic Center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi -LAT data,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 6, (2021) 063029, arXiv:2101.04694 [astro-ph.HE] . 21

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    The Consistency of Fermi-LAT Observations of the Galactic Center with a Millisecond Pulsar Population in the Central Stellar Cluster,

    K. N. Abazajian, “The Consistency of Fermi-LAT Observations of the Galactic Center with a Millisecond Pulsar Population in the Central Stellar Cluster,” JCAP 03 (2011) 010, arXiv:1011.4275 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Challenges in Explaining the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Millisecond Pulsars,

    I. Cholis, D. Hooper, and T. Linden, “Challenges in Explaining the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Millisecond Pulsars,” JCAP 06 (2015) 043, arXiv:1407.5625 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Millisecond pulsar interpretation of the Galactic center gamma-ray excess,

    Q. Yuan and B. Zhang, “Millisecond pulsar interpretation of the Galactic center gamma-ray excess,” JHEAp 3-4 (2014) 1–8, arXiv:1404.2318 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Millisecond pulsars and the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess: the importance of luminosity function and secondary emission,

    J. Petrovi´ c, P. D. Serpico, and G. Zaharijas, “Millisecond pulsars and the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess: the importance of luminosity function and secondary emission,” JCAP 02 (2015) 023, arXiv:1411.2980 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Disrupted Globular Clusters Can Explain the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess,

    T. D. Brandt and B. Kocsis, “Disrupted Globular Clusters Can Explain the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess,” Astrophys. J. 812 no. 1, (2015) 15, arXiv:1507.05616 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Resolving Galactic center GeV excess with MSP-like sources,

    D. V. Malyshev, “Resolving Galactic center GeV excess with MSP-like sources,” arXiv:2401.04565 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    Estimating Gamma-Ray Flux from Millisecond Pulsars Originating in Globular Clusters Near the Galactic Center,

    D. Kuvatova, T. Panamarev, M. Ishchenko, A. Gluchshenko, and P. Berczik, “Estimating Gamma-Ray Flux from Millisecond Pulsars Originating in Globular Clusters Near the Galactic Center,” arXiv:2410.15857 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  30. [37]

    Prospects for Detecting Gamma Rays from Annihilating Dark Matter in Dwarf Galaxies in the Era of the Dark Energy Survey and Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,

    C. He, K. Bechtol, A. P. Hearin, and D. Hooper, “Prospects for Detecting Gamma Rays from Annihilating Dark Matter in Dwarf Galaxies in the Era of the Dark Energy Survey and Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 6, (2015) 063515, arXiv:1309.4780 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,

    LSST Dark Matter Group Collaboration, A. Drlica-Wagner et al. , “Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,” arXiv:1902.01055 [astro-ph.CO]

    1902 arXiv

  32. [39]

    The Advanced Particle-astrophysics Telescope: Simulation of the Instrument Performance for Gamma-Ray Detection,

    S. Alnussirat et al. , “The Advanced Particle-astrophysics Telescope: Simulation of the Instrument Performance for Gamma-Ray Detection,” PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 590

    2021

  33. [40]

    The Advanced Particle-astrophysics Telescope (APT) Project Status,

    APT Collaboration, J. H. Buckley et al. , “The Advanced Particle-astrophysics Telescope (APT) Project Status,” PoS ICRC2021 (2021) 655

    2021

  34. [41]

    Dark matter discovery potential of the Advanced Particle-Astrophysics Telescope,

    F. Xu and D. Hooper, “Dark matter discovery potential of the Advanced Particle-Astrophysics Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 8, (2024) 083032, arXiv:2308.15538 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal,

    D. P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, “Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 083519, arXiv:astro-ph/0702587

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Oscillating Asymmetric Dark Matter,

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, “Oscillating Asymmetric Dark Matter,” JCAP 05 (2012) 013, arXiv:1202.0283 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Annihilation Signals from Asymmetric Dark Matter,

    E. Hardy, R. Lasenby, and J. Unwin, “Annihilation Signals from Asymmetric Dark Matter,” JHEP 07 (2014) 049, arXiv:1402.4500 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Reviving MeV-GeV indirect detection with inelastic dark matter,

    A. Berlin, G. Krnjaic, and E. Pinetti, “Reviving MeV-GeV indirect detection with inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 035015, arXiv:2311.00032 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Inelastic dark matter,

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, “Inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 043502, arXiv:hep-ph/0101138

    2001 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Regenerating a Symmetry in Asymmetric Dark Matter,

    M. R. Buckley and S. Profumo, “Regenerating a Symmetry in Asymmetric Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 011301, arXiv:1109.2164 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation,

    S. Ipek, D. McKeen, and A. E. Nelson, “A Renormalizable Model for the Galactic Center Gamma Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 5, (2014) 055021, arXiv:1404.3716 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,” Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1–102, arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide , vol. 80. 2000

    2000

  44. [52]

    Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV,

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al. , “Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 5, (2020) 051801, arXiv:2002.12223 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Thermal Dark Matter From A Highly Decoupled Sector,

    A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, “Thermal Dark Matter From A Highly Decoupled Sector,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 9, (2016) 095019, arXiv:1609.02555 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex] . 22

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Dark Radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon,

    H. Vogel and J. Redondo, “Dark Radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon,” JCAP 02 (2014) 029, arXiv:1311.2600 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dark radiation constraints on portal interactions with hidden sectors,

    P. Adshead, P. Ralegankar, and J. Shelton, “Dark radiation constraints on portal interactions with hidden sectors,” JCAP 09 (2022) 056, arXiv:2206.13530 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,

    E. Calabrese et al. , “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,” arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al. , “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Dark Matter’s secret liaisons: phenomenology of a dark U(1) sector with bound states,

    M. Cirelli, P. Panci, K. Petraki, F. Sala, and M. Taoso, “Dark Matter’s secret liaisons: phenomenology of a dark U(1) sector with bound states,” JCAP 05 (2017) 036, arXiv:1612.07295 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations,

    R. Essig, E. Kuflik, S. D. McDermott, T. Volansky, and K. M. Zurek, “Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations,” JHEP 11 (2013) 193, arXiv:1309.4091 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,” Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1–57, arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, “A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,” Astrophys. J. 490 (1997) 493–508, arXiv:astro-ph/9611107

    1997 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics . 1987

    1987

  56. [64]

    Effective J -factor of the Galactic Center for velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation,

    K. K. Boddy, J. Kumar, and L. E. Strigari, “Effective J -factor of the Galactic Center for velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 6, (2018) 063012, arXiv:1805.08379 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    The Effect of quark interactions on dark matter kinetic decoupling and the mass of the smallest dark halos,

    P. Gondolo, J. Hisano, and K. Kadota, “The Effect of quark interactions on dark matter kinetic decoupling and the mass of the smallest dark halos,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083523, arXiv:1205.1914 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams,

    K. Petraki, M. Postma, and M. Wiechers, “Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams,” JHEP 06 (2015) 128, arXiv:1505.00109 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    The Sommerfeld enhancement for dark matter with an excited state,

    T. R. Slatyer, “The Sommerfeld enhancement for dark matter with an excited state,” JCAP 02 (2010) 028, arXiv:0910.5713 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    A New twist on excited dark matter: Implications for INTEGRAL, PAMELA/ATIC/PPB-BETS, DAMA,

    F. Chen, J. M. Cline, and A. R. Frey, “A New twist on excited dark matter: Implications for INTEGRAL, PAMELA/ATIC/PPB-BETS, DAMA,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 063530, arXiv:0901.4327 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints,

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, “Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 11, (2017) 115021, arXiv:1709.07882 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure,

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, “Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure,” Phys. Rev. D 87 no. 11, (2013) 115007, arXiv:1302.3898 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Discovering Inelastic Thermal-Relic Dark Matter at Colliders,

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, and B. Shuve, “Discovering Inelastic Thermal-Relic Dark Matter at Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 6, (2016) 063523, arXiv:1508.03050 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA,

    A. Berlin and F. Kling, “Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 1, (2019) 015021, arXiv:1810.01879 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.