Ultrafast dynamics of vibronically dressed core-excitons in graphite: a femtosecond RIXS perspective

Alberto Simoncig; Alexander Darius Brynes; Alexander Demidovich; Antonio Caretta; Beatrice Volpato; David Garzella; Dino Novko; Elena Babici; Enrico Massimiliano Allaria; Filippo Sottocorona

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 55 references

Ultrafast dynamics of vibronically dressed core-excitons in graphite: a femtosecond RIXS perspective

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-resolved RIXS shows that an optical pump reduces the electron-phonon coupling of core excitons in graphite, with the fitted dimensionless coupling g dropping from 4.55 to 0.32 within 150 fs, and that the dynamics split into two…

desk verdict A first-of-its-kind tr-RIXS experiment on graphite with a promising qualitative result, but the headline coupling reduction from 4.55 to 0.32 is not robust because it rests on the unvalidated assumption that the core-hole lifetime is pump-independent. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12708 v1 pith:PYUB46W5 submitted 2025-04-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Marco Malvestuto , Beatrice Volpato , Elena Babici , Richa Bhardwaj , Antonio Caretta , Simone Laterza , Fulvio Parmigiani , Michele Manfredda

show 11 more authors

Alberto Simoncig Marco Zangrando Alexander Demidovich Peter Susnjar Enrico Massimiliano Allaria Alexander Darius Brynes David Garzella Luca Giannessi Primoz Rebernik Filippo Sottocorona Dino Novko

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 78.70.Ck71.35.-y78.47.J

keywords time-resolvedRIXScoreexcitonsgraphiteexciton-phononcouplingcore-holescreeningJahn-Tellerdistortionphononsidebandsfree-electronlaser

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (tr-RIXS) on graphite, using femtosecond FEL pulses, and claims to observe how core excitons lose their vibronic dressing when an optical pump creates an electron-hole plasma. The central quantitative claim is that the electron-phonon coupling parameter extracted from the RIXS phonon sideband drops from $g = 4.55 \pm 1.1$ in the unpumped sample to $g = 0.32 \pm 0.6$ at 150 fs pump-probe delay. The paper also finds two detuning-dependent regimes: near the carbon K-edge resonance the sideband intensity collapses with a roughly 65 fs time constant, assigned to screening of the core hole and suppression of the Jahn-Teller distortion; for detuning above 1 eV a slower roughly 330 fs response is assigned to thermally driven changes in interlayer spacing. If correct, the work turns tr-RIXS into a direct probe of transient exciton-phonon coupling and core-hole screening in weakly screened materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vibronically dressed core exciton: the carbon 1s core hole plus the local Jahn-Teller distortion it induces, coupled to the $E_{2g}$ phonon. The measurement leverages the fact that in RIXS the integrated inelastic sideband $R$, the spectral weight of the phonon overtones, depends on the dimensionless electron-phonon coupling $g$ and on the effective scattering time $\tau_s = 1/\sqrt{\Gamma^2 + \Omega^2}$, where $\Gamma$ is the core-hole lifetime broadening and $\Omega$ the detuning from resonance. The paper fits $R(\Omega)$ with a single-site Franck-Condon-type formula from Ament et al., treating $g$ as the adjustable parameter and keeping $\Gamma$ fixed, so that the change in sideband weight between pumped and unpumped spectra is read as a change in exciton-phonon coupling.

What would settle it

Take pumped RIXS spectra at several fluences and fit Equation (1) with $\Gamma$, $g$, and the resonance energy all free; if the best-fit $\Gamma$ increases enough that $g$ returns near 4.55, the central claim would fail. Alternatively, measure the core-hole linewidth independently under the same 32 mJ/cm$^2$ pump via core-level photoemission or Auger spectroscopy and check whether $\Gamma$ changes by more than the fitting uncertainty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that photoexcited carriers in graphite screen the carbon 1s core hole, reducing the coupling of the resulting core exciton to the $E_{2g}$ optical phonon at the zone center. The evidence is the loss-sideband spectral weight $R$ in RIXS, which is weaker in the pumped spectra and loses its detuning tail; fitting with a single-site model gives $g_{\mathrm{up}} = 4.55 \pm 1.1$ and $M_{\mathrm{up}} = 0.42$ eV for the equilibrium state and $g_p = 0.32 \pm 0.6$ and $M_p = 0.12$ eV after pumping, with an accompanying shift of the fitted resonance by about 120 meV. The paper reads the smaller $g$, the reduced coherent weight, and the resonance shift as three consistent signs that the electron-hole plasma screens the core hole rather than altering the electronic density of states. It further claims that the screening acts on the femtosecond scale set by the effective scattering time, and that the two detuning regimes isolate exciton-phonon coupling (small detuning) from lattice thermal response (large detuning).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the core-hole lifetime broadening $\Gamma$ is unchanged by the optical pump; the fitted coupling $g$ and scattering time $\tau_s$ are extracted assuming a fixed $\Gamma$, so a pump-induced change in core-hole screening would masquerade as a change in $g$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Near-resonance tr-RIXS becomes a time-resolved meter for exciton-phonon coupling, with the 65 fs collapse quantifying how fast screening suppresses vibronic dressing.
The same detuning strategy separates electronic screening from thermal lattice response: small detuning isolates core-exciton coupling, large detuning isolates interlayer strain.
The 120 meV resonance shift gives a direct, time-resolved measure of core-exciton binding-energy reduction under photoexcitation.
The method transfers to other weakly screened two-dimensional materials where core excitons and phonons interact.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension beyond the paper would be to fit the same data with $\Gamma$ left free; if the best-fit linewidth shifts with pump fluence, the reported drop in $g$ would need to be reapportioned between true coupling reduction and lifetime broadening.
The ratio $g_p/g_{\mathrm{up}} \approx 0.07$ could be measured as a function of pump fluence to calibrate screening efficiency against plasma density, a scaling the paper does not address.
The orbital selectivity of the K$\sigma$ resonance suggests tr-RIXS could be used to watch mode-specific electron-phonon coupling at other absorption edges or in heterostructures, not just graphite.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a real experimental advance—time-resolved RIXS on graphite with an optical pump—and the qualitative suppression of the phonon sideband under pumping is visible in the raw data. The detuning-dependent dynamics also look like a genuine observation. But the quantitative headline, the fitted electron-phonon coupling g dropping from 4.55 to 0.32, is not yet trustworthy. The paper itself states that the core-hole lifetime Γ was assumed unchanged in the pumped state. That assumption does the heavy lifting: Γ enters every denominator in the Franck-Condon fit, and a modest pump-induced increase in Γ would suppress the sideband at fixed coupling. The fitted gp is already consistent with zero (0.32 ± 0.6), so the model is telling you the sideband nearly vanishes; you need an independent handle on Γ in the excited state before you can call that a change in coupling rather than a change in lifetime.

Where credit is due: the measurement is new, the sample and beamline are appropriate, and the unpumped g matches literature, which gives some confidence in the fitting procedure. The idea of using detuning to separate fast electronic screening from slower thermal lattice response is well-motivated, and the two timescales (65 fs vs 330 fs) line up with that picture.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. Most serious is the fixed Γ assumption—this is load-bearing for the quantitative claim, though not for the qualitative observation. Next is energy resolution: 350 meV cannot resolve the 196 meV overtones, so the integrated 'phonon sideband weight' R is a broad observable, and the fit depends on a single-mode model that neglects the A1g mode (acknowledged in the text). Missing error bars on some data points, especially in Figure 2d, make it hard to judge the fit's weight. Finally, the pumped gp value is consistent with zero; the paper should say 'strongly reduced coupling' rather than give a specific finite number.

Who is this for? Anyone working on ultrafast X-ray scattering, exciton-phonon coupling in layered materials, or core-exciton physics in graphite. The paper deserves a serious referee: the experiment is state-of-the-art and the qualitative result is worth publishing even if the quantitative extraction needs deeper scrutiny. I would send it to review with explicit requests to (1) test sensitivity to Γ, ideally by fitting Γ and g together or using an independent estimate of the pump-induced Γ shift, (2) report error bars on R and all fitted parameters, and (3) soften the conclusion about the specific value of gp until that is done.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (tr-RIXS) study of graphite at the carbon K-edge. An optical pump resonantly excites the pi-pi* transition at the M point, generating an electron-hole plasma, and a delayed FEL probe measures RIXS loss spectra at several detunings across the K-sigma resonance. The authors define the integrated phonon sideband weight R as the difference between on- and off-resonance spectra, plot R versus detuning for pumped and unpumped cases, and fit these data with a single-site Franck-Condon model (Eq. 1). The fit yields an electron-phonon coupling parameter g = 4.55 +/- 1.1 (unpumped) and g = 0.32 +/- 0.6 (pumped at 150 fs delay), which they interpret as pump-induced screening of the core exciton reducing the exciton-phonon coupling and the Jahn-Teller distortion. Time-resolved traces of the relative change of R are fitted with a double exponential and show two regimes: a fast ~65 fs decay near resonance and a slower ~330 fs response for detuning above 1 eV, attributed to electronic screening and thermal lattice changes, respectively. The paper claims this is one of the first implementations of tr-RIXS and a seminal extension of RIXS into the ultrafast domain.

Significance. The qualitative observation that the inelastic loss tail is suppressed under optical pumping and that the suppression diminishes with detuning is clearly visible in Figure 2c and is likely a real pump-induced effect. The unpumped fitted coupling g_up = 4.55 +/- 1.1 is benchmarked against literature values, which gives some confidence in the model and fitting procedure. If the quantitative reduction of g under pumping could be established robustly, this would be a noteworthy demonstration of tr-RIXS as a probe of non-equilibrium exciton-phonon coupling and would open a new direction in ultrafast materials spectroscopy. However, the central quantitative claim currently rests on an untested assumption about the core-hole lifetime, and the statistical significance of the pumped g value is weak. The paper also provides a useful demonstration of a detuning-dependent dynamical crossover, potentially linking electronic screening to lattice thermalization.

major comments (3)

[Section III, Eq. (1)] The central quantitative claim (reduction of g from 4.55 to 0.32) depends on the explicit assumption, stated just below Eq. (1), that 'the core lifetime Gamma was assumed to remain unchanged in the out-of-equilibrium state.' This is load-bearing because Gamma appears in the denominator of every term in Eq. (1), and the effective scattering time tau_s = 1/sqrt(Gamma^2 + Omega^2) controls the build-up of the phonon sideband. If the optically excited electron-hole plasma increases the core-hole decay rate (larger Gamma), the sideband intensity is suppressed at fixed g; since the fit varies only g, the entire suppression would be absorbed into a spuriously small g_p. The pumped value g_p = 0.32 +/- 0.6 is already statistically consistent with zero, so even a modest unmodeled change in Gamma could change the conclusion from 'reduced coupling' to 'no detectable sideband.' The authors should either independently constrain Gamma in the pumped state (e.g., from the resonance linewidth or core-level lifetime measurements) or fit Gamma and g jointly and show that the inferred reduction in g is robust across the allowed Gamma range.
[Section II and Figure 2c] The stated experimental resolution is approximately 350 meV, larger than the E2g phonon energy (~196 meV), so the individual vibronic overtones are unresolved and the fitted quantity is the integrated loss weight R over [-2,0] eV. Because the model in Eq. (1) predicts a specific distribution of overtones, the integrated weight may not uniquely separate g from Gamma. The authors should provide a quantitative sensitivity analysis of the fit (e.g., chi-squared contours or bootstrap confidence intervals) to demonstrate that the reported uncertainties on g reflect the actual constraining power of the data. They should also justify neglecting the A1g mode, which contributes visible overtones in high-resolution spectra, for the integrated weight R.
[Section III, Figure 3] The temporal fits yield time constants of approximately 65 fs and 330 fs, but no uncertainties are reported for these values. The 65 fs constant is close to the stated temporal resolution (~50 fs), so the authors should provide error bars, the instrument response function, and fit residuals to demonstrate that the fast component is not an artifact of the instrument response. Without this, the claim of a distinct fast electronic regime, and the physical interpretation assigned to it, are not fully supported.

minor comments (6)

[References and SI] The reference list contains multiple formatting errors, e.g., '[2 ? –10]', '[16 ?]', '[22 ? –26]', and 'SI ??'; these placeholders should be corrected before publication.
[Equation (1) and text] There is a typographical error in the definition of the effective scattering time: the text reads 'tau_s = 1√ Γ2+Ω2' with a missing fraction bar, and the absolute value bars in Eq. (1) are typeset ambiguously; please check the math presentation.
[Figure 2d caption] The caption of Figure 2d does not define the dashed curves, although the text states they are the fitting functions Ip and Iup; the caption should explicitly identify the red and black dashed curves.
[Figure 3 inset] The inset of Figure 3a shows both colored arrows and red open circles, but the caption does not explain what the red circles represent; the text indicates they are the fitted time constants, and this should be clarified in the caption.
[Abstract and Introduction] The claims of 'one of the first implementations' and 'a seminal extension' are strong; they should be tempered or supported by a brief comparison with prior tr-RIXS work at X-ray free-electron lasers.
[Section II] The statement 'about 14% of excited atoms (see SI)' and several other references to the SI cannot be evaluated because the SI is not included in the review package; please provide the SI or move the key details into the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RIXS model is external and the unpumped coupling is externally benchmarked; the pumped reduction is a fitted parameter difference, not a circular prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim is the reduction of the fitted electron-phonon coupling parameter g from 4.55±1.1 (unpumped) to 0.32±0.6 (pumped at 150 fs delay). This is obtained by fitting the measured detuning-dependent phonon sideband weight R with Eq. (1), which is an external Franck-Condon/RIXS model taken from Ament et al. [22] and used in the same way as prior independent studies [11, 51, 52]. The unpumped result is explicitly benchmarked against the literature value for graphite from Feng et al. [11], so the static branch has external validation. The pumped value is the result of the same fitting procedure, not a quantity derived from the model's inputs by construction. The conclusion that the EPC strength decreases is a direct report of the fitted parameter difference, which is normal experimental inference rather than a circular prediction. The explicit assumption that the core-hole lifetime Γ remains unchanged in the out-of-equilibrium state is a modeling assumption and a possible source of systematic error: since Γ enters the denominator of Eq. (1), a pump-induced change in Γ could partially absorb sideband suppression into the fitted g. However, this is a robustness/correctness concern, not a self-definitional or self-citation circularity. The paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem, does not smuggle an ansatz through the authors' own prior work, and does not rename a known result. Self-citations appear only for beamline characterization [28] and for supporting ultrafast carrier/phonon dynamics in graphene [38-41], and these are ancillary rather than load-bearing for the central extraction. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All numbers in the central claim come from fitting a known model to the measured loss tail; the model's validity, the constancy of Gamma, and the interpretation of the subtraction are the main assumptions.

free parameters (5)

Electron-phonon coupling parameter g (unpumped) = 4.55 +/- 1.1
Fitted to the unpumped RIXS loss tail using Eq. 1.
Electron-phonon coupling parameter g (pumped) = 0.32 +/- 0.6
Fitted to the pumped RIXS loss tail at 150 fs delay using Eq. 1.
Fast decay time constant = approximately 65 fs
Fitted to the time-resolved change in R near resonance (small detuning).
Slow recovery time constant = approximately 330 fs
Fitted to the time-resolved change in R for detuning above 1 eV.
Off-resonance rescaling factor r = per-spectrum scaling value
Chosen so the off-resonance coherent spectrum matches the on-resonance intensity at zero energy loss; affects the computed inelastic weight R.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The single-site Franck-Condon model in Eq. 1 accurately describes the phonon sideband intensity as a function of detuning.
Adopted from Ament et al. and Geondzhian and Gilmore; the model assumes one local mode and no multimode interference.
ad hoc to paper Core-hole lifetime Gamma is unchanged in the optically excited state.
Explicitly assumed in the fitting procedure in Section III; not tested or justified.
domain assumption The off-resonance spectrum represents purely coherent scattering, identical in lineshape to the coherent part of the on-resonance spectrum.
Used to subtract the coherent component and isolate the phonon sideband.
domain assumption The optical pump creates an electron-hole plasma that increases core-hole screening without significantly altering the density of states probed at the sigma* edge.
Interpretation of the pump effect relies on this plasma screening picture.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast dynamics of vibronically dressed core-excitons in graphite: a femtosecond RIXS perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYUB46W5

@misc{pith2026250412708,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast dynamics of vibronically dressed core-excitons in graphite: a femtosecond RIXS perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYUB46W5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12708}
}

read the original abstract

This study demonstrates one of the first implementations of time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (tr-RIXS), marking a seminal extension of RIXS spectroscopy into the ultrafast time domain. By investigating the ultrafast dynamics of vibronically dressed core excitons in graphite using femtosecond X-ray pulses from a Free Electron Laser, we reveal previously inaccessible insights into the transient coupling between core excitons and specific optical phonon modes. Our approach establishes tr-RIXS as a powerful, transformative tool capable of elucidating the intricate interplay between electronic and lattice dynamics, opening new avenues in ultrafast materials research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12708 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** panel a: an FEL pulse, tuned to the carbon absorption edge, excites the system by creating a core-hole exciton which is strongly coupled to mode-selective phonons. After a characteristic scattering time duration, the system emits a photon with altered energy. panel b: a schematic illustration of the RIXS scattering process leading to phonon excitation. The vibrational wavefunction in the ground state projects onto m… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Panel a: C K-edge XAS of HOPG. The energy of the FEL photon pulse is varied across the 1s−2sp2 σ channel. Panel b: unpumped RIXS loss spectra (black curves) recorded at different on-resonance photon energies (indicated by coloured dots in panel a) across the carbon K-edge, plotted as a function of energy loss. These on-resonance spectra are compared with an off-resonance unpumped spectrum (blue curves). The maximum … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Panel a: dynamics of the relative change in the integrated intensity of overtones R as a function of the time delay. The data were measured at four different incident photon energies varying detuning relative to the absorption threshold. The inset shows the carbon Kσ threshold, with coloured arrows indicating the photon energies at which the dynamics displayed in the main figure were measured. The red line and marke… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

[1]

P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconduc- tors, Physics and Materials Properties, Graduate Texts in Physics , 1 (2005)

work page 2005
[2]

Zhang, N

L. Zhang, N. Schwertfager, T. Cheiwchanchamnangij, X. Lin, P.-A. Glans-Suzuki, L. F. J. Piper, S. Limpi- jumnong, Y. Luo, J. F. Zhu, W. R. L. Lambrecht, and J.-H. Guo, Electronic band structure of graphene from resonant soft x-ray spectroscopy: The role of core-hole effects, Physical Review B 86, 245430 (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

Wessely, M

O. Wessely, M. I. Katsnelson, and O. Eriksson, Ab Initio Theory of Dynamical Core-Hole Screening in Graphite from X-Ray Absorption Spectra, Physical Review Letters 8 94, 167401 (2005)

work page 2005
[4]

Ahuja, P

R. Ahuja, P. A. Br¨ uhwiler, J. M. Wills, B. Johansson, N. M˚ artensson, and O. Eriksson, Theoretical and exper- imental study of the graphite 1s x-ray absorption edges, Physical Review B 54, 14396 (1996)

work page 1996
[5]

P. A. Br¨ uhwiler, A. J. Maxwell, C. Puglia, A. Nilsson, S. Andersson, and N. M˚ artensson,π* and σ* Excitons in C 1s Absorption of Graphite, Physical Review Letters 74, 614 (1995)

work page 1995
[6]

Skytt, P

P. Skytt, P. Glans, D. C. Mancini, J. H. Guo, N. Wass- dahl, J. Nordgren, and Y. Ma, Angle-resolved soft-x-ray fluorescence and absorption study of graphite, Physical Review B 50, 10457 (1994)

work page 1994
[7]

Y. Ma, P. Skytt, N. Wassdahl, P. Glans, J. Guo, and J. Nordgren, Core excitons and vibronic coupling in di- amond and graphite, Physical Review Letters 71, 3725 (1993)

work page 1993
[8]

Sette, G

F. Sette, G. K. Wertheim, Y. Ma, G. Meigs, S. Mod- esti, and C. T. Chen, Lifetime and screening of the C 1s photoemission in graphite, Physical Review B 41, 9766 (1990)

work page 1990

Show all 55 references

[9]

X. Weng, P. Rez, and H. Ma, Carbon K-shell near-edge structure: Multiple scattering and band-theory calcula- tions, Physical Review B 40, 4175 (1989)

1989
[10]

E. J. Mele and J. J. Ritsko, Fermi-Level Lowering and the Core Exciton Spectrum of Intercalated Graphite, Physi- cal Review Letters 43, 68 (1979)

1979
[11]

X. Feng, S. Sallis, Y.-C. Shao, R. Qiao, Y.-S. Liu, L. C. Kao, A. S. Tremsin, Z. Hussain, W. Yang, J. Guo, and Y.-D. Chuang, Disparate Exciton-Phonon Couplings for Zone-Center and Boundary Phonons in Solid-State Graphite, Physical Review Letters 125, 116401 (2020), 2001.01327

2020 arXiv
[12]

Gilmore, Quantifying vibronic coupling with resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25, 217 (2022)

K. Gilmore, Quantifying vibronic coupling with resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25, 217 (2022)

2022
[13]

C. D. Dashwood, A. Geondzhian, J. G. Vale, A. C. Pakpour-Tabrizi, C. A. Howard, Q. Faure, L. S. I. Veiga, D. Meyers, S. G. Chiuzb˘ aian, A. Nicolaou, N. Jaouen, R. B. Jackman, A. Nag, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, K.-J. Zhou, A. C. Walters, K. Gilmore, D. F. McMorrow, and M. P. M. ...

2021 arXiv
[14]

Geondzhian and K

A. Geondzhian and K. Gilmore, Generalization of the Franck-Condon model for phonon excitations by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Physical Review B101, 214307 (2020), 2002.08793

2020 arXiv
[16]

P. M. T. M. v. Attekum and G. K. Wertheim, Excitonic Effects in Core-Hole Screening, Physical Review Letters 43, 1896 (1979)

1979
[17]

Ishioka, M

K. Ishioka, M. Hase, M. Kitajima, L. Wirtz, A. Ru- bio, and H. Petek, Ultrafast electron-phonon decoupling in graphite, Physical Review B 77, 121402 (2008), pub- lisher: American Physical Society, 0712.1879

2008 arXiv
[18]

C. D. Spataru, M. A. Cazalilla, A. Rubio, L. X. Benedict, P. M. Echenique, and S. G. Louie, Anomalous Quasipar- ticle Lifetime in Graphite: Band Structure Effects, Phys- ical Review Letters 87, 246405 (2001), publisher: Amer- ican Physical Society, cond-mat/0107043

2001 arXiv
[19]

Pagliara, G

S. Pagliara, G. Galimberti, S. Mor, M. Montagnese, G. Ferrini, M. S. Grandi, P. Galinetto, and F. Parmi- giani, Photoinduced π-π* Band Gap Renormalization in Graphite, Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 6318 (2011)

2011
[20]

P. F. Williams, D. L. Rousseau, and S. H. Dworetsky, Resonance Fluorescence and Resonance Raman Scatter- ing: Lifetimes in Molecular Iodine, Physical Review Let- ters 32, 196 (1974)

1974
[21]

Gelmukhanov and H

F. Gelmukhanov and H. ˚Agren, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering with symmetry-selective excitation, Physical Review A 49, 4378 (1994)

1994
[22]

L. J. P. Ament, M. v. Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. v. d. Brink, Resonant inelastic x-ray scatter- ing studies of elementary excitations, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 705 (2011), 1009.3630

2011 arXiv
[23]

J. A. Carlisle, E. L. Shirley, E. A. Hudson, L. J. Ter- minello, T. A. Callcott, J. J. Jia, D. L. Ederer, R. C. C. Perera, and F. J. Himpsel, Probing the Graphite Band Structure with Resonant Soft-X-Ray Fluorescence, Phys- ical Review Letters 74, 1234 (1994)

1994
[24]

Yavas, M

H. Yavas, M. v. Veenendaal, J. v. d. Brink, L. J. P. Ament, A. Alatas, B. M. Leu, M.-O. Apostu, N. Wizent, G. Behr, W. Sturhahn, H. Sinn, and E. E. Alp, Observa- tion of phonons with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 22, 485601 (2010), 1009.4356

2010 arXiv
[25]

M. v. Veenendaal and P. Carra, Excitons and Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering in Graphite, Physical Review Letters 78, 2839 (1997), publisher: American Physical Society

1997
[26]

Harada, T

Y. Harada, T. Tokushima, Y. Takata, T. Takeuchi, Y. Ki- tajima, S. Tanaka, Y. Kayanuma, and S. Shin, Dynamical Symmetry Breaking under Core Excitation in Graphite: Polarization Correlation in Soft X-Ray Recombination Emission, Physical Review Letters 93, 017401 (2004), cond-ma...

2004 arXiv
[27]

Geondzhian and K

A. Geondzhian and K. Gilmore, Demonstration of res- onant inelastic x-ray scattering as a probe of exciton- phonon coupling, Physical Review B 98, 214305 (2018), 1810.13405

2018 arXiv
[28]

Malvestuto, A

M. Malvestuto, A. Caretta, R. Bhardwaj, S. Laterza, F. Parmigiani, A. Gessini, M. Zamolo, F. Galassi, R. Sergo, G. Cautero, M. B. Danailov, A. Demidovic, P. Sigalotti, M. Lonza, R. Borghes, A. Contillo, A. Si- moncig, M. Manfredda, L. Raimondi, and M. Zangrando, The MagneDyn b...

2022
[29]

Nordgren and J

J. Nordgren and J. Guo, Instrumentation for soft X-ray emission spectroscopy, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 110, 1 (2000)

2000
[30]

M. B. Danailov, F. Bencivenga, F. Capotondi, F. Ca- solari, P. Cinquegrana, A. Demidovich, E. Giangrisos- tomi, M. P. Kiskinova, G. Kurdi, M. Manfredda, C. Mas- ciovecchio, R. Mincigrucci, I. P. Nikolov, E. Pedersoli, E. Principi, and P. Sigalotti, Towards jitter-free pump- pr...

2014
[31]

Sigalotti, P

P. Sigalotti, P. Cinquegrana, A. Demidovich, R. Ivanov, I. Nikolov, G. Kurdi, and M. B. Danailov, Ultrafast laser synchronization at the FERMI@Elettra FEL (2013) p. 9 87780Q

2013
[32]

S. Xu, J. Cao, C. C. Miller, D. A. Mantell, R. J. D. Miller, and Y. Gao, Energy Dependence of Electron Lifetime in Graphite Observed with Femtosecond Photoemission Spectroscopy, Physical Review Letters 76, 483 (1996)

1996
[33]

Breusing, S

M. Breusing, S. Kuehn, T. Winzer, E. Mali´ c, F. Milde, N. Severin, J. P. Rabe, C. Ropers, A. Knorr, and T. El- saesser, Ultrafast nonequilibrium carrier dynamics in a single graphene layer, Physical Review B 83, 153410 (2011)

2011
[34]

Piscanec, M

S. Piscanec, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, A. C. Ferrari, and J. Robertson, Kohn Anomalies and Electron-Phonon Interactions in Graphite, Physical Review Letters 93, 185503 (2004), cond-mat/0407164

2004 arXiv
[35]

C.-H. Park, F. Giustino, C. D. Spataru, M. L. Co- hen, and S. G. Louie, First-Principles Study of Electron Linewidths in Graphene, Physical Review Letters 102, 076803 (2009), 0902.3638

2009 arXiv
[36]

C.-H. Park, F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Velocity Renormalization and Carrier Lifetime in Graphene from the Electron-Phonon Interaction, Physi- cal Review Letters 99, 086804 (2007), 0707.1666

2007 arXiv
[37]

J. C. Johannsen, S. Ulstrup, F. Cilento, A. Crepaldi, M. Zacchigna, C. Cacho, I. C. E. Turcu, E. Springate, F. Fromm, C. Raidel, T. Seyller, F. Parmigiani, M. Gri- oni, and P. Hofmann, Direct View of Hot Carrier Dynam- ics in Graphene, Physical Review Letters 111, 027403 (2013...

2013 arXiv
[38]

Caruso, D

F. Caruso, D. Novko, and C. Draxl, Photoemission sig- natures of nonequilibrium carrier dynamics from first principles, Physical Review B 101, 035128 (2020), 1909.06549

2020 arXiv
[39]

Novko and M

D. Novko and M. Kralj, Phonon-assisted processes in the ultraviolet-transient optical response of graphene, npj 2D Materials and Applications 3, 48 (2019), 1911.04826

2019 arXiv
[40]

Duvel, M

M. Duvel, M. Merboldt, J. P. Bange, H. Strauch, M. Stellbrink, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil, G. S. M. Jansen, S. Steil, D. Novko, S. Mathias, and M. Reutzel, Far-from-Equilibrium Electron-Phonon Interactions in Optically Excited Graphene, Nano Let- ters 22, ...

2022
[41]

Girotto and D

N. Girotto and D. Novko, Dynamical Phonons Following Electron Relaxation Stages in Photoexcited Graphene, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 14, 8709 (2023)

2023
[42]

T. P. H. Sidiropoulos, N. D. Palo, D. E. Rivas, S. Sev- erino, M. Reduzzi, B. Nandy, B. Bauerhenne, S. Krylow, T. Vasileiadis, T. Danz, P. Elliott, S. Sharma, K. De- whurst, C. Ropers, Y. Joly, M. E. Garcia, M. Wolf, R. Ernstorfer, and J. Biegert, Probing the Energy Con- versi...

2021 arXiv
[43]

Breusing, C

M. Breusing, C. Ropers, and T. Elsaesser, Ultrafast Car- rier Dynamics in Graphite, Physical Review Letters 102, 086809 (2008)

2008
[44]

Kampfrath, L

T. Kampfrath, L. Perfetti, F. Schapper, C. Frischkorn, and M. Wolf, Strongly Coupled Optical Phonons in the Ultrafast Dynamics of the Electronic Energy and Cur- rent Relaxation in Graphite, Physical Review Letters 95, 187403 (2005)

2005
[45]

J. J. Ritsko, Valence- and core-electronic excitations in potassium-intercalated graphite, Physical Review B 25, 6452 (1982)

1982
[46]

Carlisle, S

J. Carlisle, S. Blankenship, L. Terminello, J. Jia, T. Call- cott, D. Ederer, R. Perera, and F. Himpsel, Crystal- momentum-resolved electronic structure of solids using resonant soft-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 110, 3...

2000
[47]

Skytt, J

P. Skytt, J. Guo, N. Wassdahl, J. Nordgren, Y. Luo, and H. ˚Agren, Probing symmetry breaking upon core excita- tion with resonant x-ray fluorescence, Physical Review A 52, 3572 (1995)

1995
[48]

Skytt, P

P. Skytt, P. Glans, J.-H. Guo, K. Gunnelin, C. S˚ athe, J. Nordgren, F. K. Gel’mukhanov, A. Cesar, and H. ˚Agren, Quenching of Symmetry Breaking in Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering by Detuned Excitation, Phys- ical Review Letters 77, 5035 (1996)

1996
[49]

Y. Ma, N. Wassdahl, P. Skytt, J. Guo, J. Nordgren, P. D. Johnson, J.-E. Rubensson, T. Boske, W. Eberhardt, and S. D. Kevan, Soft-x-ray resonant inelastic scattering at the C K edge of diamond, Physical Review Letters 69, 2598 (1992)

1992
[50]

Gelmukhanov, T

F. Gelmukhanov, T. Privalov, and H. Agren, Collapse of vibrational structure in spectra of resonant x-ray Raman scattering, Physical Review A 56, 256 (1997)

1997
[51]

Rossi, R

M. Rossi, R. Arpaia, R. Fumagalli, M. M. Sala, D. Betto, K. Kummer, G. M. D. Luca, J. v. d. Brink, M. Salluzzo, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghiringhelli, Exper- imental Determination of Momentum-Resolved Electron- Phonon Coupling, Physical Review Letters 123, 027001 (...

2019 arXiv
[52]

Gelmukhanov, M

F. Gelmukhanov, M. Odelius, S. P. Polyutov, A. F¨ ohlisch, and V. Kimberg, Dynamics of reso- nant x-ray and Auger scattering, Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 035001 (2021)

2021
[53]

J.-A. Yang, S. Parham, D. Dessau, and D. Reznik, Novel Electron-Phonon Relaxation Pathway in Graphite Re- vealed by Time-Resolved Raman Scattering and Angle- Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy, Scientific Reports 7, 40876 (2017), 1610.06233

2017 arXiv
[54]

M. Harb, A. Jurgilaitis, H. Enquist, R. N¨ uske, C. v. K. Schmising, J. Gaudin, S. L. Johnson, C. J. Milne, P. Beaud, E. Vorobeva, A. Caviezel, S. O. Mariager, G. Ingold, and J. Larsson, Picosecond dynamics of laser- induced strain in graphite, Physical Review B 84, 045435 (2011)

2011
[55]

Carbone, P

F. Carbone, P. Baum, P. Rudolf, and A. H. Zewail, Struc- tural Preablation Dynamics of Graphite Observed by Ul- trafast Electron Crystallography, Physical Review Let- ters 100, 035501 (2008)

2008
[56]

Carbone, The interplay between structure and orbitals in the chemical bonding of graphite, Chemical Physics Letters 496, 291 (2010)

F. Carbone, The interplay between structure and orbitals in the chemical bonding of graphite, Chemical Physics Letters 496, 291 (2010)

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconduc- tors, Physics and Materials Properties, Graduate Texts in Physics , 1 (2005)

work page 2005

[2] [2]

Zhang, N

L. Zhang, N. Schwertfager, T. Cheiwchanchamnangij, X. Lin, P.-A. Glans-Suzuki, L. F. J. Piper, S. Limpi- jumnong, Y. Luo, J. F. Zhu, W. R. L. Lambrecht, and J.-H. Guo, Electronic band structure of graphene from resonant soft x-ray spectroscopy: The role of core-hole effects, Physical Review B 86, 245430 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

Wessely, M

O. Wessely, M. I. Katsnelson, and O. Eriksson, Ab Initio Theory of Dynamical Core-Hole Screening in Graphite from X-Ray Absorption Spectra, Physical Review Letters 8 94, 167401 (2005)

work page 2005

[4] [4]

Ahuja, P

R. Ahuja, P. A. Br¨ uhwiler, J. M. Wills, B. Johansson, N. M˚ artensson, and O. Eriksson, Theoretical and exper- imental study of the graphite 1s x-ray absorption edges, Physical Review B 54, 14396 (1996)

work page 1996

[5] [5]

P. A. Br¨ uhwiler, A. J. Maxwell, C. Puglia, A. Nilsson, S. Andersson, and N. M˚ artensson,π* and σ* Excitons in C 1s Absorption of Graphite, Physical Review Letters 74, 614 (1995)

work page 1995

[6] [6]

Skytt, P

P. Skytt, P. Glans, D. C. Mancini, J. H. Guo, N. Wass- dahl, J. Nordgren, and Y. Ma, Angle-resolved soft-x-ray fluorescence and absorption study of graphite, Physical Review B 50, 10457 (1994)

work page 1994

[7] [7]

Y. Ma, P. Skytt, N. Wassdahl, P. Glans, J. Guo, and J. Nordgren, Core excitons and vibronic coupling in di- amond and graphite, Physical Review Letters 71, 3725 (1993)

work page 1993

[8] [8]

Sette, G

F. Sette, G. K. Wertheim, Y. Ma, G. Meigs, S. Mod- esti, and C. T. Chen, Lifetime and screening of the C 1s photoemission in graphite, Physical Review B 41, 9766 (1990)

work page 1990