Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

First insight into transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation physics at photon-photon colliders

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Single-tagged photon-photon collisions at future lepton colliders can measure quark transverse-momentum fragmentation functions through two-hadron azimuthal asymmetries around the jet thrust axis, with a 16:1:1 charge-weight flavor…

desk verdict A careful first TMD application to photon-photon collisions, with a genuinely new set of two-hadron azimuthal moments and a useful 16:1:1 flavor hierarchy, but with an apparent factor-2 inconsistency in the Appendix C helicity amplitudes that needs to be resolved before the quantitative predictions are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12802 v1 pith:54FVIBN5 submitted 2025-04-17 hep-ph

Simone Anedda , Francesco Murgia , Cristian Pisano This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords transversemomentumdependentfragmentationfunctionsCollinseffectphoton-photoncollisionsazimuthalasymmetriesthrustaxisflavorseparationTMDfactorizationfutureleptoncolliders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Photon-photon scattering, in the single-tagged configuration available at future lepton colliders, can serve as a new laboratory for transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) quark fragmentation. The paper derives the leading-order, leading-twist cross section for $\ell^+\ell^-\to\gamma^*\gamma\to q\bar q\to h_1h_2+X$ and shows that the azimuthal distribution of the two hadrons around the recoil axis contains moments that isolate ratios of Collins and unpolarized TMD fragmentation functions. The distinctive advantage claimed is flavor separation: the quark charge factor $e_q^4$ weights up-type quarks 16 times more than down/s quarks (versus 4 in $e^+e^-$ annihilation), and the DIS photon virtuality can be varied to study the scale dependence within one process. The paper is a proposal and derivation rather than a measurement; its value rests on whether TMD factorization survives in this clean electromagnetic environment.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the helicity-formalism TMD factorization of the process $\ell^+\ell^-\to\gamma^*\gamma\to q\bar q\to h_1h_2+X$: a helicity density matrix for the tagged virtual photon, a Weizs\"acker-Williams distribution for the quasi-real photon, the leading-order helicity amplitudes for $\gamma^*\gamma\to q\bar q$, and TMD fragmentation functions written as soft helicity amplitudes. Combining these gives a differential cross section whose angular modulations are packaged into azimuthal moments (Table I); the moments that carry Collins information are charge-weighted ratios of products of unpolarized and Collins fragmentation functions.

What would settle it

Measure the kinematical-only azimuthal moments of Table I (the first three rows, which do not involve fragmentation functions) in a single-tagged photon-photon experiment. If they disagree systematically with the analytic expressions of the paper while Collins-sensitive moments also fail to match SIDIS or $e^+e^-$ extractions, the factorized TMD description would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the two-hadron azimuthal distribution around the thrust axis in single-tagged $\gamma^*\gamma$ collisions is governed, at leading order and leading twist, by the same ratios of TMD fragmentation functions that appear in $e^+e^-$ semi-inclusive annihilation, but with $e_q^4$ instead of $e_q^2$ flavor weights. The moments in Table I with $m_{12}=\pm1$ and $n_q=1,2$ are proportional to $\sum_q e_q^4 \Delta^N D_{q}^{h_1}\Delta^N D_{\bar q}^{h_2}/\sum_q e_q^4 D_q^{h_1}D_{\bar q}^{h_2}$, so they can be used to extract the Collins function, while the first three rows are independent of fragmentation functions and can test the setup. The charge-weight factor gives up-type quarks a 16-fold advantage over down- and strange-type quarks, a stronger flavor separation than the 4:1:1 of direct $e^+e^-$ annihilation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that TMD factorization holds for $\gamma^*\gamma \to h_1 h_2 + X$ in the nearly back-to-back, large-transverse-momentum regime; the paper states this is “expected to hold” but does not prove it for this exact process.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The first three moments listed in Table I do not depend on fragmentation functions at fixed $z_1,z_2$; they can validate the initial-state and hard-scattering description before any Collins extraction.
  • The Collins-sensitive moments are proportional to charge-weighted ratios of Collins and unpolarized TMD fragmentation functions, so the measured combination is dominated by up-type quarks with a 16:1:1 flavor hierarchy.
  • Because $Q^2$ can be changed through $x_B,y$ without changing the beam energy, the same experimental setup can map the scale dependence of TMD fragmentation functions.
  • The formalism transfers to linear-collider Compton-backscattered photon beams and to ultraperipheral hadron collisions, although the hadronic environment is more complex there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A practical consequence, if the factorization assumption holds: even a modest-luminosity photon-photon run could function as a nearly direct up-quark Collins function measurement, since down and strange quark contributions are suppressed by a factor of 16 relative to up quarks.
  • The same moment machinery, applied to final states with a spin-1/2 hadron (for example a $\Lambda$), could probe the polarizing fragmentation function that drives spontaneous $\Lambda$ polarization; the paper mentions this direction but does not develop it.
  • An immediate testable extension is to implement full TMD scale evolution in this cross section using the existing $e^+e^-$ evolution machinery; the authors say this does not change the modulation structure, making the predictions testable at planned colliders.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes the single-tagged photon-photon process ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ → γ*γ → q q̄ → h1 h2 + X as a new probe of transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation functions (TMD FFs). Using a leading-order, leading-twist TMD factorization approach within the helicity formalism, the authors derive the fully differential cross section, extract the azimuthal moments of the unpolarized cross section and of the longitudinal double-spin asymmetry, and summarize them in Table I. The moments involve ratios of unpolarized and Collins TMD FFs with a flavor weighting proportional to e_q^4, yielding a 16:1:1 hierarchy for u/c versus d/s/b quarks that the authors argue improves flavor separation relative to SIDIS and e⁺e⁻ SIA. The manuscript also discusses the scale dependence of TMD FFs, potential extensions to ultraperipheral collisions, and the experimental prerequisites at future lepton colliders.

Significance. If the underlying assumptions are valid, the paper identifies a genuinely new class of TMD-FF observables with a clean electromagnetic initial state and a flavor structure that is complementary to existing SIDIS and e⁺e⁻ SIA measurements. The analytic derivation is detailed and self-contained, with appendices for kinematics, the virtual-photon density matrix, and the helicity amplitudes; the derivation is also free of fitted parameters, and the proposed 16:1:1 charge-weight hierarchy is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The structural insight is valuable, but the quantitative reliability of the predictions is currently hampered by an internal inconsistency in one helicity amplitude and by the unproven TMD factorization for this specific process. These issues must be resolved before the results can be used as a solid basis for phenomenology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] The third helicity amplitude, H_{+−;−1,1}, has an internal inconsistency. In the first equality the prefactor is 2√3 e² e_q² e^{−i2φ_q} [ŝ/(ŝ+Q²)] √(t̂/û), which simplifies to 2√3 e² e_q² e^{−i2φ_q} [(ξ−x_B)/ξ] √(ζ/(1−ζ)). The printed simplified equality, however, drops the factor 2 and gives √3 e² e_q² e^{−i2φ_q} [(ξ−x_B)/ξ] √(ζ/(1−ζ)). The other five amplitudes in Eq. (C1) consistently retain the 2√3 prefactor in their simplified forms, so this is not an overall normalization convention. Because these amplitudes enter the helicity sums in Eq. (11) and thereby determine the coefficients A_U,L and B_U,L in Eqs. (25)–(26) and the moments in Table I, the missing factor changes the quantitative predictions. The authors should correct this amplitude and re-derive the affected coefficients.
  2. [Sec. II, comment (a); Conclusions] TMD factorization for γ*γ → h1 h2 + X is assumed but not proven. The paper states that factorization is 'expected to hold' and that the authors are 'confident' based on the colorless initial state and universality of TMD FFs. However, no theorem is provided, and the paper acknowledges in the Introduction (Ref. [19]) that similar multi-hadron processes can suffer from factorization-breaking effects. This is load-bearing because the central claim—that the moments in Table I isolate TMD fragmentation functions—depends entirely on this assumption. The authors should either provide a factorization argument for this process (e.g., a Collins-Soper-style derivation along the lines of the proven e⁺e⁻ SIA case), or explicitly frame the results as conditional on a factorization hypothesis and explain why the known factorization-breaking mechanisms are absent here.
  3. [Sec. II, comment (d)] The competing γ-gluon contribution is only argued to be suppressed, with no quantitative estimate. The text states that it 'should be suppressed' and that the suppression is 'only partially compensated' by a factor α α_s(Q²), but no numerical comparison of the γg to γγ fusion cross sections is given. Since the proposed observables are meant to provide clean information on TMD FFs, the contamination from γg fusion must be shown to be negligible (or a strategy to eliminate it must be specified). A rough estimate using the Weizsäcker-Williams photon spectrum and a lepton gluon distribution, or a comparison in a simple kinematic limit, would make the claim credible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (25)] In the expression for A_U, the term '1 − 2ζ(1−ζ) / ζ(1−ζ)' should be written with parentheses as (1 − 2ζ(1−ζ))/(ζ(1−ζ)) to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Table I] The entries marked '//' should be explained, e.g., by noting that those moments vanish by angular integration; without an explanation the reader may mistake them for typographical omissions.
  3. [General] The paper would be strengthened by a short model-based estimate of the expected magnitudes of the azimuthal moments in Table I and of the event rates for a concrete collider design (e.g., FCC-ee or CEPC). The authors acknowledge that luminosity questions remain, but a numerical illustration would help assess the experimental feasibility.
  4. [Title/Abstract] There is a spacing artifact in the title/abstract ('fragme ntation'); this should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is self-contained and the azimuthal moments are not redefinitions of the inputs.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the paper's derivation chain. The observable (two-hadron azimuthal moments around the jet thrust axis) is obtained by inserting explicit helicity density matrices (Appendix B), explicit leading-order helicity amplitudes for gamma* gamma -> q qbar (Appendix C), and the standard decomposition of TMD fragmentation functions into unpolarized and Collins functions (Eqs. (17)-(21)) into the factorized cross section (Eq. (11)). No parameter is fitted to the process, and no TMD FF is defined through the photon-photon observable; the Collins and unpolarized FFs enter as external nonperturbative ingredients, so expressing the moments as ratios involving them is not equivalent to the input by construction. The self-citations to Refs. [8,11,37,39] are methodological continuity and a cross-check, and the relevant formulas are reproduced in the paper rather than being imported unexamined. The assumption that TMD factorization holds for this process is explicitly flagged as expected ('we are confident') rather than derived, so it is a stated physical assumption, not a circular import. Even if the numerical factor in Eq. (C1) were incorrect, that would be an internal calculational error affecting the size of the coefficients, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard TMD formalism plus assumptions specific to the photon-photon process. No free parameters are fitted to data. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TMD factorization holds for gamma* gamma -> h1 h2 + X.
    Assumed by analogy with e+e- SIA; stated as "expected to hold" in Sec. II comment (a), but no theorem or proof is provided for this exact process. Load-bearing because without it the derived moments do not isolate TMD FFs.
  • domain assumption Leading-order, leading-twist approximation with massless light quarks.
    Hard scattering is computed at leading order in QED and QCD, quark masses are neglected, and helicity conservation is used. This is standard but limits the predictive reach of the formulas.
  • domain assumption Weizsacker-Williams equivalent photon approximation for the quasi-real photon.
    The untagged photon is treated as collinear and described by a Weizsacker-Williams distribution f_gamma/l inside the lepton, used before Eq. (3). This is a standard but approximate description.
  • domain assumption TMD fragmentation functions are universal and process independent.
    The authors rely on Refs. [27-29] to transfer Collins and unpolarized FFs from e+e- SIA to the photon-photon process. If universality fails, the flavor and scale arguments break down.
  • domain assumption The gamma-gluon contribution is suppressed and can be neglected.
    Sec. II comment (d) argues that f_g/l inside the lepton is suppressed because a primary photon must first produce a q qbar pair. This is plausible but not quantified, and it is not included in the numerical or analytic results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First insight into transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation physics at photon-photon colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/54FVIBN5

@misc{pith2026250412802,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First insight into transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation physics at photon-photon colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/54FVIBN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12802}
}
abstract

Future planned lepton colliders, both in the circular and linear configurations, can effectively work as virtual and quasi-real photon-photon colliders and are expected to stimulate an intense physics program in the next few years. In this paper, we suggest to consider photon-photon scattering as a useful source of information on transverse momentum dependent fragmentation functions (TMD FFs), complementing semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering and $e^+e^-$ annihilation processes, which provide most of the present phenomenological information on TMD FFs. As a first illustrative example, we study two-hadron azimuthal asymmetries around the jet thrust-axis in the process $\ell^+\ell^-\to\gamma^* \gamma\to q\bar q\to h_1 h_2 + X$, in which in a circular lepton collider one tagged, deeply-virtual photon scatters off an untagged quasi-real photon, both originating from the initial lepton beams, producing inclusively an almost back-to-back light-hadron pair with large transverse momentum, in the $\gamma^*\gamma$ center of mass frame. Similar processes, in a more complicated environment due to the presence of initial hadronic states, can also be studied in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC and the planned future hadron colliders.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First constraints on the nonperturbative gluon Collins-Soper kernel

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First lattice-QCD constraints on the nonperturbative gluon Collins-Soper kernel are obtained at near-physical pion mass with uNNLL LaMET matching on a single a=0.15 fm ensemble.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    General Helicity Formalism for Polarized Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murg ia, E. R. Nocera, and A. Prokudin, “General Helicity Formalism for Polarized Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Sca ttering,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 114019 , arXiv:1101.1011 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  2. [1]

    The first sum over (light) quark flavors extends to q =u, ¯u,d, ¯d,s, ¯s; it can be generalized to include heavy ( c,b) flavors

    work page

  3. [2]

    In the second sum {λi} stays for a sum over all involved helicity indices

    work page

  4. [3]

    ˜ρ(γ∗ 1 ) and ρ(γ2) are respectively the helicity density matrices of the virtual photo nγ∗ 1 and the quasi-real one, γ2, whose expression will be given in the following; 4)fγ/ℓ,P ℓ ˆz (ξ) is the Weizs¨ acher-Williams distribution for the quasi-real photon inside the initial unpolarized ( P ℓ ˆz = 0) or longitudinally polarized ( P ℓ ˆz = ±1) ℓ− lepton an...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol

    J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol. 32. Cambridge University Press, 2011

    2011

  6. [5]

    The ˆHλq ,λ ¯q;λ1,λ2 ’s are the helicity scattering amplitudes for the hard partonic proce ssγ∗ 1 (λ1) +γ2(λ2) →q(λq) + ¯q(λ¯q)

    work page

  7. [6]

    An energy scale dependence of parton distribution and fragmenta tion functions is implied throughout this paper

    Finally, the ˆDh λq,λ′ q (z, p⊥ )’s are the transverse momentum dependent fragmentation func tions encoding the soft fragmentation process of quark q into the final hadron h carrying a light-cone momentum fraction z of the parent quark momentum and an intrinsic transverse momentum p⊥ with respect to its direction of motion. An energy scale dependence of pa...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse momentum,

    A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. J. Mulders, a nd M. Schlegel, “Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse momentum,” JHEP 02 (2007) 093 , arXiv:hep-ph/0611265

    arXiv 2007

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    Without loss of generality, we have chosen the leptonic plane as the x-z plane of our reference frame

    The lepton-beam or Laboratory cm frame We first consider the Laboratory, or ℓ+-ℓ− cm frame, where the tagged lepton ℓ+ moves along the +ˆz axis and the untagged one, ℓ−, in the opposite direction; for massless leptons, we have: l+ = √s 2 ( 1, 0, 0, 1 ), l− = q2/ξ = √s 2 ( 1, 0,...

  2. [9]

    In this frame γ∗ 1 moves along the +ˆz axis, and the untagged lepton, ℓ−, and γ2 in the opposite direction

    The virtual photon - untagged lepton γ∗ 1 -ℓ− cm frame This frame is the analogous of the γ∗-nucleon reference frame usually adopted in semi-inclusive deep inela stic scattering processes, with the untagged lepton ℓ− and the quasi-real photon γ2 playing respectively the role o...

  3. [10]

    The final quark and antiquark are p roduced back to back in a plane forming an angle φq with the ℓ+-ℓ′+ leptonic plane, that we have assumed to be the ˆ x-ˆz plane

    The virtual photon - quasi-real photon γ∗ 1 -γ2 cm frame This is the cm frame of the hard partonic scattering process γ∗ 1γ2 →q ¯q, again with γ∗ 1 moving along the +ˆz axis and the untagged lepton and γ2 moving in the opposite direction. The final quark and antiquark are p rod...

  4. [11]

    Next Generation EU

    to fix K 2 T = ζ(1 −ζ)(ξ −xB)ys = ζ(1 −ζ)ˆs. In Eq. ( 24), φq is the azimuthal angle of the scattering plane of the process γ∗ 1γ2 →q ¯q with respect to the leptonic plane ℓ+-ℓ′ + for the tagged photon. Moreover, we have introduced the angle φ12 =φh1 q −φh2 ¯q , where, as can b...

    2022

  5. [12]

    ( 11), one has to reinstate the appropriate normalization factor, usin g ˜ρ =ρ Tr[ ˜ρ], where Tr[ ˜ρ] = 2e2 (2 −y)2 Q2y2 ≡ 2e2 (2 −y)2 xBy3s

    has to be used in normalized observables related to d σ/σ, while in the differential cross section dσ, Eq. ( 11), one has to reinstate the appropriate normalization factor, usin g ˜ρ =ρ Tr[ ˜ρ], where Tr[ ˜ρ] = 2e2 (2 −y)2 Q2y2 ≡ 2e2 (2 −y)2 xBy3s . (13) Concerning the untagged...

  6. [13]

    ( A23), ξmin(Q2) = xmin B (Q2) ( 1 + 4Q2 0 Q2 ) = ymin(Q2)

    Furthermore, ymin(Q2) = Q2 xmax B (Q2)s = Q2 + 4Q2 0 s , (A25) and, from Eq. ( A23), ξmin(Q2) = xmin B (Q2) ( 1 + 4Q2 0 Q2 ) = ymin(Q2). (A26) Summarizing, then, we have the constraints: Q2 0 ≤ Q2 ≤ s − 4Q2 0, Q2 s ≤ xB ≤ Q2 Q2 + 4Q2 0 , (A27) Q2 + 4Q2 0 s ≤ y, ξ ≤ 1. 14 Appen...

  7. [14]

    TMD Handbook,

    R. Boussarie et al. , “TMD Handbook,” arXiv:2304.03302 [hep-ph] . 16

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    QCD factorization for sp in-dependent cross sections in DIS and Drell-Yan processes at low transverse momentum,

    X.-d. Ji, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, “QCD factorization for sp in-dependent cross sections in DIS and Drell-Yan processes at low transverse momentum,” Phys. Lett. B 597 (2004) 299–308 , arXiv:hep-ph/0405085

    2004 arXiv

  9. [16]

    QCD factorization for se mi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum,

    X.-d. Ji, J.-p. Ma, and F. Yuan, “QCD factorization for se mi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034005 , arXiv:hep-ph/0404183

    2005 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Factorizat ion Theorem For Drell-Yan At Low qT And Transverse Momentum Distributions On-The-Light-Cone,

    M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, “Factorizat ion Theorem For Drell-Yan At Low qT And Transverse Momentum Distributions On-The-Light-Cone,” JHEP 07 (2012) 002 , arXiv:1111.4996 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [18]

    The complete tree-lev el result up to order 1 /Q for polarized deep-inelastic leptoproduction,

    P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman, “The complete tree-lev el result up to order 1 /Q for polarized deep-inelastic leptoproduction,” Nucl. Phys. B461 (1996) 197–237 , arXiv:hep-ph/9510301

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dilepton productio n from polarized hadron hadron collisions,

    S. Arnold, A. Metz, and M. Schlegel, “Dilepton productio n from polarized hadron hadron collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034005 , arXiv:0809.2262 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Asymmetries in pol arized hadron production in e+e− annihilation up to order 1/Q,

    D. Boer, R. Jakob, and P. J. Mulders, “Asymmetries in pol arized hadron production in e+e− annihilation up to order 1/Q,” Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 345–380 , arXiv:hep-ph/9702281

    1997 arXiv

  14. [22]

    General heli city formalism for two-hadron production in e+e− annihilation within a TMD approach,

    U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia, and M. Zaccheddu, “General heli city formalism for two-hadron production in e+e− annihilation within a TMD approach,” JHEP 10 (2021) 078 , arXiv:2108.05632 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Linearly Polarized Gluons and the Higgs Transverse Momentum Distribution,

    D. Boer, W. J. den Dunnen, C. Pisano, M. Schlegel, and W. V ogelsang, “Linearly Polarized Gluons and the Higgs Transverse Momentum Distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 032002 , arXiv:1109.1444 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gluon Distribution Fun ctions and Higgs Boson Production at Moderate Transverse Momentum,

    P. Sun, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, “Gluon Distribution Fun ctions and Higgs Boson Production at Moderate Transverse Momentum,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 094005 , arXiv:1109.1354 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Probing Gluo nic Spin-Orbit Correlations in Photon Pair Production,

    J.-W. Qiu, M. Schlegel, and W. Vogelsang, “Probing Gluo nic Spin-Orbit Correlations in Photon Pair Production,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 062001 , arXiv:1103.3861 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Studies of gluon TMDs and their evolution using quarkonium-pair production at the LHC,

    F. Scarpa, D. Boer, M. G. Echevarria, J.-P. Lansberg, C. Pisano, and M. Schlegel, “Studies of gluon TMDs and their evolution using quarkonium-pair production at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 87 , arXiv:1909.05769 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Accessing the Transverse Dynamics and Polarization of Gluons inside the Proton at the LHC,

    W. J. den Dunnen, J. P. Lansberg, C. Pisano, and M. Schleg el, “Accessing the Transverse Dynamics and Polarization of Gluons inside the Proton at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 212001 , arXiv:1401.7611 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Polarized gluon studies with cha rmonium and bottomonium at LHCb and AFTER,

    D. Boer and C. Pisano, “Polarized gluon studies with cha rmonium and bottomonium at LHCb and AFTER,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094007 , arXiv:1208.3642 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Spin asymmetries for C-even quarkonium production as a probe of gluon distributions,

    N. Kato, L. Maxia, and C. Pisano, “Spin asymmetries for C-even quarkonium production as a probe of gluon distributions,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034038 , arXiv:2403.20017 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    No Generalized TMD-Fact orization in Hadro-Production of High Transverse Momentum Hadrons,

    T. C. Rogers and P. J. Mulders, “No Generalized TMD-Fact orization in Hadro-Production of High Transverse Momentum Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094006 , arXiv:1001.2977 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    The Two photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon appro ximation,

    V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Meledin, and V. G. Serb o, “The Two photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon appro ximation,” Phys. Rept. 15 (1975) 181–281

    1975

  24. [32]

    Colliding γe and γγ Beams Based on the Single Pass Accelerators (of Vlepp Type),

    I. F. Ginzburg, G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, and V. I. Telnov , “Colliding γe and γγ Beams Based on the Single Pass Accelerators (of Vlepp Type),” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 205 (1983) 47–68

    1983

  25. [33]

    Colliding γe and γγ Beams Based on the Single Pass e+e− Accelerators. 2. Polarization Effects. Monochromatizatio n Improvement,

    I. F. Ginzburg, G. L. Kotkin, S. L. Panfil, V. G. Serbo, and V. I. Telnov, “Colliding γe and γγ Beams Based on the Single Pass e+e− Accelerators. 2. Polarization Effects. Monochromatizatio n Improvement,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 219 (1984) 5–24

    1984

  26. [34]

    Kolanoski, Two-photon physics at e+e− storage rings , vol

    H. Kolanoski, Two-photon physics at e+e− storage rings , vol. 105. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Photon–photon physics at the LHC and laser beam experiments, present and future,

    L. Schoeffel, C. Baldenegro, H. Hamdaoui, S. Hassani, C. Royon, and M. Saimpert, “Photon–photon physics at the LHC and laser beam experiments, present and future,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120 103889, arXiv:2010.07855 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons,

    C. F. von Weizsacker, “Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons,” Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 612–625

    1934

  29. [37]

    Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiati on formulae,

    E. J. Williams, “Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiati on formulae,” Phys. Rev. 45 (1934) 729–730

    1934

  30. [38]

    Universality of soft and coll inear factors in hard-scattering factorization,

    J. C. Collins and A. Metz, “Universality of soft and coll inear factors in hard-scattering factorization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 252001 , arXiv:hep-ph/0408249

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Azimuthal Asymmetric Distribution of Hadron s Inside a Jet at Hadron Collider,

    F. Yuan, “Azimuthal Asymmetric Distribution of Hadron s Inside a Jet at Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 032003 , arXiv:0709.3272 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A model i ndependent analysis of gluonic pole matrix elements and universality of TMD fragmentation functions,

    L. P. Gamberg, A. Mukherjee, and P. J. Mulders, “A model i ndependent analysis of gluonic pole matrix elements and universality of TMD fragmentation functions,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 071503 , arXiv:1010.4556 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Back-To-Back Jets in QCD,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Back-To-Back Jets in QCD, ” Nucl. Phys. B193 (1981) 381

    1981

  34. [42]

    Back-To-Back Jets: Fouri er Transform from b to kT ,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Back-To-Back Jets: Fouri er Transform from b to kT ,” Nucl. Phys. B 197 (1982) 446–476

    1982

  35. [43]

    Transverse M omentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, “Transverse M omentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production,” Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 199

    1985

  36. [44]

    Model-Independent Evolution of Transverse Momentum Dependent Distribution Functions (TMDs) at NNLL,

    M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, A. Sch¨ afer, and I. Scimemi , “Model-Independent Evolution of Transverse Momentum Dependent Distribution Functions (TMDs) at NNLL,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2636 , arXiv:1208.1281 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Soft and Co llinear Factorization and Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions,

    M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, “Soft and Co llinear Factorization and Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions,” Phys. Lett. B726 (2013) 795–801 , arXiv:1211.1947 [hep-ph] . 17

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    T ransverse Λ polarization in e+e− processes within a TMD factorization approach and the polarizing fragmentation f unction,

    U. D’Alesio, L. Gamberg, F. Murgia, and M. Zaccheddu, “T ransverse Λ polarization in e+e− processes within a TMD factorization approach and the polarizing fragmentation f unction,” JHEP 12 (2022) 074 , arXiv:2209.11670 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    T ransverse Λ polarization in e+e− annihilations and in SIDIS processes at the EIC within TMD factorization,

    U. D’Alesio, L. Gamberg, F. Murgia, and M. Zaccheddu, “T ransverse Λ polarization in e+e− annihilations and in SIDIS processes at the EIC within TMD factorization,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 094004 , arXiv:2307.02359 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments,

    C. Pisano, D. Boer, S. J. Brodsky, M. G. A. Buffing, and P. J. Mulders, “Linear polarization of gluons and photons in unpolarized collider experiments,” JHEP 10 (2013) 024 , arXiv:1307.3417 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    How to analyze vector meson pr oduction in inelastic lepton scattering,

    K. Schilling and G. Wolf, “How to analyze vector meson pr oduction in inelastic lepton scattering,” Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 381–413

    1973

  42. [50]

    Off dia gonal helicity density matrix elements for heavy vector mes ons inclusively produced in N N, γN and ℓN interactions,

    M. Anselmino, M. Bertini, F. Murgia, and B. Pire, “Off dia gonal helicity density matrix elements for heavy vector mes ons inclusively produced in N N, γN and ℓN interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 438 (1998) 347–352 , arXiv:hep-ph/9805234

    1998 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The general partonic structure for hadronic spin asymmetries,

    M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, E. Leader, S. Me lis, and F. Murgia, “The general partonic structure for hadronic spin asymmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 014020 , arXiv:hep-ph/0509035

    2006 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Fragmentation of transversely polariz ed quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions,

    J. C. Collins, “Fragmentation of transversely polariz ed quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions,” Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 161–182 , arXiv:hep-ph/9208213

    1993 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.