Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Analog ensemble forecasts of solar wind parameters: Quantification of the predictability and time-domain spectral performance

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 'similar day' forecasting method for solar wind velocity and magnetic field beats persistence and climatology in about 60% of tested intervals, and a new spectral reduction keeps the small-scale fluctuations that simple averaging erases.

desk verdict Solid, reproducible methods paper with a genuinely useful spectral-reduction idea, but the abstract overclaims the frequency-accuracy advantage for the two most prominent quantities. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14102 v2 pith:SFMCRJXO submitted 2025-04-18 physics.space-ph

Pauline A. Simon , Christopher H. K. Chen , Mathew J. Owens , Chaitanya Sishtla This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-ph
keywords analogensemblesolarwindforecastingmesoscalefluctuationsspectralreductionspaceweatherspacecraftpredictabilityratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the Analog Ensemble (AnEn) method, applied to 24-second-resolution Wind spacecraft observations of near-Earth solar wind, produces genuinely useful forecasts: at its optimal lead time it is more accurate than persistence and climatology for about 60% of the 200 reference intervals tested, and it tracks persistence at short lead times and climatology at long ones. The paper also claims that the usual way of collapsing an AnEn ensemble into one forecast, averaging the member time series, erases power in small-scale fluctuations, and that a newly proposed spectral reduction, which builds the reduced forecast from the geometric mean of the member amplitude spectra, preserves that power. This matters because mesoscale solar wind fluctuations, from minutes to hours, feed the magnetosphere and are exactly what bulk forecasts lose. If true, the method gives space weather forecasting a fast, purely data-driven way to produce fluctuation-aware upstream conditions and a stronger baseline for judging physics-based forecast models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spectral reduction of Eq. (6): the reduced time series is the inverse Fourier transform of a spectrum whose amplitude is the geometric mean of the amplitudes of the $N_A$ individual analog forecast spectra and whose phase is the phase of the mean-reduced forecast. This is what preserves small-scale fluctuation power that the mean reduction loses, and it is the new mechanism the paper contributes. The evaluation is carried by the spectral ratio $SR(f) = \log_{10}(\|\mathrm{FFT}(Q_{\mathrm{forecast}})\|/\|\mathrm{FFT}(Q_{\mathrm{reference\ progression}})\|)$, fitted above $10^{-4}$ Hz to give a small-scale slope $\gamma_{SR}$ and a level $\delta_{SR}$ at $10^{-2}$ Hz; together with the normalised root-mean-square error and the skill score, these diagnostics quantify the time-frequency trade-off.

What would settle it

Take a set of gap-free 24-second-resolution intervals, or synthetic signals with a known power spectrum, build AnEn mean-reduced and spectral-reduced forecasts for the same reference times, and compare the spectral-ratio level $\delta_{SR}$ at $10^{-2}$ Hz; if the spectral-reduced $\delta_{SR}$ is not closer to zero than the mean-reduced value on complete data, then the paper's frequency-accuracy claim is an artefact of the missing-value interpolation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that by ranking past 24-second-resolution solar wind windows according to their mean-square distance to a current reference pattern and using the 30 most similar past progressions, an AnEn forecast of velocity and magnetic-field quantities can beat persistence and climatology in over 60% of reference intervals at the optimal lead time, and can beat the 27.125-day synodic-recurrence baseline in time-domain accuracy at lead times of roughly two to three days for the main components. A second claim is that mean reduction of the ensemble causes a frequency-dependent loss of small-scale fluctuation power because individual analog forecasts are phase-shifted relative to one another. The paper's response is the spectral reduction: the inverse Fourier transform of a composite spectrum whose amplitude is the geometric mean of the individual member amplitude spectra and whose phase is taken from the mean-reduced forecast. The paper argues that, for most of the quantities studied, this spectral-reduced forecast is more time-accurate than the synodic baseline and more frequency-accurate than the mean-reduced forecast, so it acts as a compromise between temporal fidelity and spectral fidelity.

Load-bearing premise

The frequency-accuracy advantage of the spectral reduction rests on the assumption that the Fourier amplitude spectra of the analog samples are faithful, but up to 35% of values are missing in one sub-dataset and are linearly interpolated before the transform; if that interpolation distorts the spectra, the claimed edge over mean reduction on gap-free data is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An operational AnEn could provide 24-second-resolution solar wind forecasts at L1 that are more reliable than persistence and climatology for a majority of time intervals, at least during low solar activity.
  • Users who need the fluctuation spectrum, such as magnetospheric coupling estimates, downscaling, or data assimilation, should use the spectral-reduced forecast rather than the mean-reduced one, because the mean reduction artificially flattens small scales.
  • The spectral-reduced AnEn forecast can serve as a comparative baseline for space weather model diagnostics, sitting between the synodic recurrence baseline in time accuracy and the mean-reduced forecast in frequency accuracy.
  • The optimal lead time of roughly two to three days for the main velocity and magnetic-field components, and hours for the minor components, gives a practical horizon for using AnEn forecasts in operations.
  • The spectral-ratio diagnostic, with its slope and level parameters, can be reused to score any forecast model's scale-by-scale performance, not only AnEn forecasts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • As an editorial extension, the spectral reduction is a generic ensemble post-processing step: any ensemble forecast whose members are phase-shifted realisations of the same process could use the same geometric-amplitude, shared-phase construction to avoid averaging away variance.
  • If the interpolation of missing values in the gap-heavy sub-datasets is indeed corrupting the amplitude spectra, then on gap-free data the advantage of spectral reduction over mean reduction could be larger or smaller than reported; testing on complete high-cadence intervals would settle which direction.
  • The predictability result suggests a practical ranking rule: components with longer autocorrelation times, such as the main radial velocity and ecliptic magnetic-field components, are the best targets for AnEn forecasting, while fluctuation-dominated minor components may need a different error metric or a different pattern-matching input.
  • Because the method is cheap and needs only past in-situ data, it is a natural complement to physics-based coronal and heliospheric models: it could supply mesoscale structure that those models resolve poorly, provided the historical record contains analogues of the current stream state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Analog Ensemble (AnEn) method to 24-s-resolution Wind spacecraft observations of near-Earth solar wind velocity and magnetic field components, comparing forecasts against persistence, climatology, and synodic-recurrence baselines. It introduces a spectral-ratio diagnostic to evaluate scale-by-scale frequency-domain performance and proposes a new spectral-reduction algorithm intended to preserve small-scale fluctuation power when reducing the AnEn ensemble to a single forecast. Statistical performance is assessed over NR=200 reference samples, with optimal ensemble size, pattern size, and lead time selected from those samples, and the paper reports predictability in terms of the percentage of samples for which AnEn has positive skill relative to the baselines. The central claims are that AnEn is better than both persistence and climatology for more than 60% of samples at a particular lead time, and that the spectral-reduced forecast is more time-accurate than the synodic baseline and more frequency-accurate than the mean-reduced forecast.

Significance. If the results are established, the paper would offer a useful contribution to space-weather forecasting at mesoscales, where empirical, fast, and easily implemented methods are valuable. The new spectral-ratio diagnostic and the spectral-reduction idea are potentially transferable beyond solar-wind forecasting, and the authors provide open code and data, which strengthens reproducibility. The comparisons against persistence, climatology, and synodic recurrence are appropriate and the discussion of caveats (data gaps, historical dataset limitations, calibration bias) is candid. However, the headline claims in the abstract are not fully supported by the quantitative results, and the selection of hyperparameters and lead times on the same samples used for performance evaluation means the reported skill is likely optimistic. These issues are central to the paper's message and need to be addressed before the claims can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3.4, Table 3] The abstract's statement that the spectral-reduced AnEn forecast is 'more frequency-accurate than the mean-reduced forecasts' is not supported for the headline quantity ∥V∥ nor for Vx: Table 3 reports δSR = −0.048 for the mean-reduced and −0.145 for the spectral-reduced forecast of ∥V∥, and −0.053 versus −0.137 for Vx, with the spectral-reduced value further from the ideal value of zero in both cases. The table note itself concedes the exception. Because ∥V∥ is the lead example used in Figures 3, 4, 6, and 8, the unqualified abstract claim overstates the result. In addition, the abstract's 'more than 60% of the samples' is contradicted by Table 3, where the magnetic-field magnitude has Π = 58% for the mean-reduced and 47% for the spectral-reduced forecast. Please qualify these claims to the specific quantities and lead times for which they hold, and revise the abstract accordingly.
  2. [§3.3–3.4] The optimal ensemble size NA = 30, pattern size TP = 192 s, and the optimal lead time TL are all selected by inspecting the same NR = 200 reference samples on which the final predictability values in Table 3 are reported. Since TL is defined as the forecast size that maximizes Π on those samples, the reported 'better than both baselines for more than 60% of samples' is an in-sample maximum and is therefore likely to be optimistic. No cross-validation, out-of-sample split, or confidence intervals are provided, so the reader cannot determine whether the differences between the two reduction methods or between AnEn and the baselines are statistically meaningful. Please add a validation strategy or clearly label these as exploratory in-sample estimates, and ideally report uncertainty bounds on Π, NRMSE, and δSR.
  3. [§2.3 and §4, Eq. (6)] Up to 35% of values are missing in one sub-dataset, and the Discussion explicitly states that missing values must be linearly interpolated before the Fourier transform used in the spectral reduction. Because the geometric-mean amplitude in Eq. (6) is computed from these interpolated time series, interpolation artifacts could bias the amplitude spectra and therefore the δSR comparison that underlies the frequency-accuracy claim. The authors note that the performance converges for spectral diagnostics that also interpolate the mean-reduced forecasts, but this does not establish that the spectral-reduction advantage persists on gap-free data. A sensitivity analysis (for example, inserting synthetic gaps into a clean interval, or restricting the analysis to near-gap-free sub-intervals) is needed to quantify this potential bias.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.4, Eq. (5)] The assumption that SR(f) is linear in log-log space above 10^-4 Hz is justified only by the case study in Fig. 6; a brief sensitivity analysis of γSR and δSR to the choice of cutoff frequency would make the diagnostic more robust and easier to interpret.
  2. [§3.4, near Eq. (3)] The sentence 'It is contained in the positive Skill diagnostic depending on the ratio between a reduced forecast and the baseline forecast' is unclear; please restate the definition of Π directly in terms of the number of reference samples with Skill > 0.
  3. [Fig. 7] The line styles and colors for the five pattern sizes TP are difficult to distinguish in the printed figure; consider labeling curves directly or using a separate table of values for clarity.
  4. [Table 3] The table note does not explicitly state that the NRMSE and δSR values are computed at TF = TL; adding this to the note would prevent ambiguity when comparing rows.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No definitional circularity; the derivation is self-contained, with only a minor in-sample tuning concern that does not reduce any prediction to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. AnEn forecasts are built from historical analogs ranked by MSD (Eq. 1) and contain no information from the reference progression at construction time. The spectral reduction (Eq. 6) synthesizes a reduced time series from the geometric mean of individual analog spectra and the phase of the mean-reduced forecast; neither ingredient is taken from the reference progression, so evaluating the resulting delta_SR against the reference is not a tautology. The paper's own Table 3 reports cases (||V|| and Vx) where the spectral-reduced delta_SR is farther from zero than the mean-reduced one, which confirms that the claimed frequency advantage is an empirical outcome rather than a definitional identity. The predictability Pi is an empirical fraction of NR samples with positive skill relative to baselines, and TL is identified with the persistence/climatology crossing in Fig. 8 rather than being an arbitrarily fitted output. The main caveat is in-sample selection: NA=30 and TP=192 s are chosen from the same NR=200 reference samples used to report performance, so the 60% value may be somewhat optimistic; however, this is a statistical bias, not a case of a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, and it does not make the central comparison equivalent to its input. The Discussion's missing-value interpolation caveat is a data-quality limitation, not circularity. Self-citations introduce the AnEn framework (Owens et al. 2017; Riley et al. 2017) and the synodic calibration (Owens et al. 2013), but the skill scores are computed from Wind data and are externally falsifiable, so the citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The abstract's unqualified 'more frequency-accurate' statement is contradicted for ||V|| and Vx by Table 3, but that is an accuracy/consistency issue, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are algorithmic choices (TP, NA, TL) that are tuned on the test set, plus an empirical frequency cutoff. The main domain assumptions are the analog forecasting premise and the stationarity of the low-activity period.

free parameters (5)
  • Pattern size TP = 192 s (selected as optimal in Sec. 3.3)
    Chosen from the same NR=200 references; results depend on this choice.
  • Ensemble size NA = 30 (selected as optimal in Sec. 3.3)
    Chosen from the same NR=200 references; compromise between NRMSE and spectral preservation.
  • Optimal lead time TL = varies per quantity (e.g., 3.8e5 s for ||V|| mean red.)
    Defined as the forecast size with maximum predictability Pi on the NR=200 samples; in-sample optimum.
  • Spectral fit lower frequency cutoff = 10^-4 Hz
    Empirically chosen from Fig. 6, affects delta_SR and gamma_SR.
  • Synodic recurrence period = 27.125 days
    Taken from Owens et al. 2013; not fit in this paper.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Analog method assumption: similar past patterns lead to similar future evolutions.
    Section 2.1, the core of AnEn.
  • domain assumption Stationarity of solar wind statistics over 2004-2009 (low solar activity).
    Section 2.3, dataset limited to this period; results may not generalize to high activity.
  • ad hoc to paper Spectral ratio SR(f) is linear in log-log space above 10^-4 Hz.
    Equation (5), the fit is used to quantify small-scale performance; the cutoff is empirical.
  • domain assumption Linear interpolation of missing values before FFT does not bias the amplitude spectra.
    Section 4 caveat, required for spectral reduction; up to 35% missing in one subset.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analog ensemble forecasts of solar wind parameters: Quantification of the predictability and time-domain spectral performance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SFMCRJXO

@misc{pith2026250414102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analog ensemble forecasts of solar wind parameters: Quantification of the predictability and time-domain spectral performance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SFMCRJXO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14102}
}
read the original abstract

Forecasting multiscale properties of the solar wind is one of the important aspects of space weather prediction as mesoscales, larger than one minute, can affect the magnetosphere. Amongst forecasting techniques, the Analog Ensemble (AnEn) method allows the forecast of a quantity from its past behavior, is easy and quick to implement, and results in an ensemble of time series. A comparison of optimal AnEn forecasts of \textit{Wind} spacecraft observations of near-Earth solar wind properties with the persistence and climatology baselines allows a quantification of the predictability of the magnetic and velocity components and magnitude. The AnEn predictions were found to be as accurate as persistence for short-term forecasts and climatology for long-term ones, and performed better than both baselines for more than 60\% of the samples for a particular lead time. Furthermore, using an AnEn instead of the baselines enables prediction of the full spectrum of solar wind fluctuations. However, using the standard averaging method to generate a unique forecast from the AnEn ensemble results in a loss of power in the small-scale fluctuations. To prevent this loss, a new spectral reduction method is proposed and compared to the standard averaging method as well as the synodic recurrence baseline. The AnEn spectral-reduced forecast is shown to be more time-accurate than the synodic baseline and more frequency-accurate than the mean-reduced forecasts. Such a reduced forecast is then confirmed to be useful as a comparative baseline in performance diagnostics of space weather models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14102 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of the AnEn method used in this article. The historical dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary of the progressions compared to quantify the performance of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forecasts of proton velocity magnitude for the reference time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Forecasts of proton velocity magnitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Summary of the reduction algorithm used to obtain the AnEn reduced forecast [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral ratio of short-term (panel a) and long-term (panel b) forecasts and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Summary of statistical performances (median on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Performance of mean-reduced (black, panels a and c) and spectral-reduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Ogilvie, K W

    acuna_global_1995 APACrefauthors Acuña, M H. , Ogilvie, K W. , Baker, D N. , Curtis, S A. , Fairfield, D H. \ Mish, W H. APACrefauthors \ 1995 02 . The Global Geospace Science Program and its investigations The Global Geospace Science Program and its investigations . Space Sci Rev 71 1 5--21 . APACrefURL [ 2025-03-16 ]https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751323 AP...

    doi:10.1007/bf00751323 1995

  2. [2]

    , Pulkkinen, T I

    ala-lahti_impact_2024 APACrefauthors Ala-Lahti, M. , Pulkkinen, T I. , Brenner, A. , Keebler, T. , Al Shidi, Q. , Hill, S. \ Welling, D. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . The Impact of Solar Wind Magnetic Field Fluctuations on the Magnetospheric Energetics The Impact of Solar Wind Magnetic Field Fluctuations on the Magnetospheric Energetics . Geophysical Research L...

    work page doi:10.1029/2024gl112922 2024

  3. [3]

    Kernel Analog Forecasting: Multiscale Test Problems

    burov_kernel_2020 APACrefauthors Burov, D. , Giannakis, D. , Manohar, K. \ Stuart, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . Kernel Analog Forecasting : Multiscale Test Problems . Kernel Analog Forecasting : Multiscale Test Problems . arXiv . APACrefURL [ 2024-09-06 ]http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06623 APACrefURL arXiv:2005.06623 [physics, stat]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    , Droettboom, M

    caswell_matplotlibmatplotlib_2021 APACrefauthors Caswell, T A. , Droettboom, M. , Lee, A. , Sales De Andrade, E. , Hoffmann, T. , Hunter, J. Ivanov, P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 11 . matplotlib/matplotlib: REL : v3.5.0 matplotlib/matplotlib: REL : v3.5.0 . Zenodo . APACrefURL [ 2025-04-07 ]https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021zndo...5706396C APACrefURL Publi...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5706396 2021

  5. [5]

    , Bale, S D

    chen_evolution_2020 APACrefauthors Chen, C H K. , Bale, S D. , Bonnell, J W. , Borovikov, D. , Bowen, T A. , Burgess, D. Whittlesey, P. APACrefauthors \ 2020 02 . The Evolution and Role of Solar Wind Turbulence in the Inner Heliosphere The Evolution and Role of Solar Wind Turbulence in the Inner Heliosphere . ApJS 246 2 53 . APACrefURL [ 2024-05-01 ]https...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab60a3 2020

  6. [6]

    , Lodkina, I G

    dremukhina_relationship_2018 APACrefauthors Dremukhina, L A. , Lodkina, I G. \ Yermolaev, Y I. APACrefauthors \ 2018 11 . Relationship between the Parameters of Various Solar Wind Types and Geomagnetic Activity Indices Relationship between the Parameters of Various Solar Wind Types and Geomagnetic Activity Indices . Cosmic Res 56 6 426--433 . APACrefURL [...

    work page doi:10.1134/s0010952518060011 2018

  7. [7]

    , Telloni, D

    damicis_effect_2020 APACrefauthors D’Amicis, R. , Telloni, D. \ Bruno, R. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . The Effect of Solar - Wind Turbulence on Magnetospheric Activity The Effect of Solar - Wind Turbulence on Magnetospheric Activity . Front. Phys. 8 . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-07 ]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.604857 APACrefURL Publisher...

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    , Biffis, E

    eastwood_economic_2017 APACrefauthors Eastwood, J P. , Biffis, E. , Hapgood, M A. , Green, L. , Bisi, M M. , Bentley, R D. Burnett, C. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . The Economic Impact of Space Weather : Where Do We Stand ? The Economic Impact of Space Weather : Where Do We Stand ? Risk Analysis 37 2 206--218 . APACrefURL [ 2024-03-16 ]https://onlinelibrary.wil...

    doi:10.1111/risa.12765 2017

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    , Owens, M J

    haines_forecasting_2021 APACrefauthors Haines, C. , Owens, M J. , Barnard, L. , Lockwood, M. , Ruffenach, A. , Boykin, K. \ McGranaghan, R. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Forecasting Occurrence and Intensity of Geomagnetic Activity With Pattern - Matching Approaches Forecasting Occur...

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    , Ebihara, Y

    hayakawa_solar_2025 APACrefauthors Hayakawa, H. , Ebihara, Y. , Mishev, A. , Koldobskiy, S. , Kusano, K. , Bechet, S. Miyoshi, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2025 01 . The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in 2024 May : A Flash Data Report The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in 2024 May : A Flas...

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    , Magdalenic, J

    hinterreiter_assessing_2019 APACrefauthors Hinterreiter, J. , Magdalenic, J. , Temmer, M. , Verbeke, C. , Jebaraj, I C. , Samara, E. Isavnin, A. APACrefauthors \ 2019 12 . Assessing the Performance of EUHFORIA Modeling the Background Solar Wind Assessing the Performance of EUH...

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    APACrefauthors \ 2007 05

    hunter_matplotlib_2007 APACrefauthors Hunter, J D. APACrefauthors \ 2007 05 . Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment . Computing in Science & Engineering 9 3 90--95 . APACrefURL [ 2025-04-07 ]https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4160265 APA...

    2007

  5. [13]

    , Tessein, J A

    isaacs_systematic_2015 APACrefauthors Isaacs, J J. , Tessein, J A. \ Matthaeus, W H. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Systematic averaging interval effects on solar wind statistics Systematic averaging interval effects on solar wind statistics . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space P...

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    , Witherington, J

    lang_improving_2021 APACrefauthors Lang, M. , Witherington, J. , Turner, H. , Owens, M J. \ Riley, P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Improving Solar Wind Forecasting Using Data Assimilation Improving Solar Wind Forecasting Using Data Assimilation . Space Weather 19 7 e2020SW002698 . ...

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    , Acũna, M H

    lepping_wind_1995 APACrefauthors Lepping, R P. , Acũna, M H. , Burlaga, L F. , Farrell, W M. , Slavin, J A. , Schatten, K H. Worley, E M. APACrefauthors \ 1995 02 . The WIND magnetic field investigation The WIND magnetic field investigation . Space Sci Rev 71 1 207--229 . APAC...

    1995 doi

  8. [16]

    , Anderson, K A

    lin_three-dimensional_1995 APACrefauthors Lin, R P. , Anderson, K A. , Ashford, S. , Carlson, C. , Curtis, D. , Ergun, R. Paschmann, G. APACrefauthors \ 1995 02 . A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle investigation for the wind spacecraft A three-dimensional plasma...

    1995 doi

  9. [17]

    , Bale, S D

    lin_wind_2021 APACrefauthors Lin, R P. , Bale, S D. , Wilson III, L B. \ Schroeder, P. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Wind 3DP 24-sec Ion OmniDirectional Fluxes and Moments . Wind 3DP 24-sec Ion OmniDirectional Fluxes and Moments . NASA Space Physics Data Facility; Space Sciences Lab...

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    liu_pileup_2024 APACrefauthors Liu, Y D. , Hu, H. , Zhao, X. , Chen, C. \ Wang, R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 10 . A Pileup of Coronal Mass Ejections Produced the Largest Geomagnetic Storm in Two Decades A Pileup of Coronal Mass Ejections Produced the Largest Geomagnetic Storm in T...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    , Bentley, S N

    lockwood_development_2019 APACrefauthors Lockwood, M. , Bentley, S N. , Owens, M J. , Barnard, L A. , Scott, C J. , Watt, C E. \ Allanson, O. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . The Development of a Space Climatology : 1. Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling as a Function of Timescale and th...

    2019

  12. [20]

    APACrefauthors \ 1969 07

    lorenz_atmospheric_1969 APACrefauthors Lorenz, E N. APACrefauthors \ 1969 07 . Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 26 4 636--646 . ...

    1969

  13. [21]

    , Al-Haddad, N

    lugaz_need_2025 APACrefauthors Lugaz, N. , Al-Haddad, N. , Zhuang, B. , Möstl, C. , Davies, E E. , Farrugia, C J. Galvin, A B. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . The Need for a Sub - L1 Space Weather Research Mission : Current Knowledge Gaps on Coronal Mass Ejections The Need for a Sub -...

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    , Jian, L K

    macneice_assessing_2018 APACrefauthors MacNeice, P. , Jian, L K. , Antiochos, S K. , Arge, C N. , Bussy-Virat, C D. , DeRosa, M L. Sokolov, I. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Assessing the Quality of Models of the Ambient Solar Wind Assessing the Quality of Models of the Ambient Solar...

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    , Chornay, D J

    ogilvie_swe_1995 APACrefauthors Ogilvie, K W. , Chornay, D J. , Fritzenreiter, R J. , Hunsaker, F. , Keller, J. , Lobell, J. Gergin, E. APACrefauthors \ 1995 02 . SWE , a comprehensive plasma instrument for the WIND spacecraft SWE , a comprehensive plasma instrument for the WI...

    1995 doi

  16. [24]

    , Liu, Y

    oloketuyi_responses_2020 APACrefauthors Oloketuyi, J. , Liu, Y. , Amanambu, A C. \ Zhao, M. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Responses and Periodic Variations of Cosmic Ray Intensity and Solar Wind Speed to Sunspot Numbers Responses and Periodic Variations of Cosmic Ray Intensity and S...

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    , Hapgood, M

    oughton_risk_2019 APACrefauthors Oughton, E J. , Hapgood, M. , Richardson, G S. , Beggan, C D. , Thomson, A W P. , Gibbs, M. Horne, R B. APACrefauthors \ 2019 05 . A Risk Assessment Framework for the Socioeconomic Impacts of Electricity Transmission Infrastructure Failure Due ...

    2019

  18. [26]

    , Challen, R

    owens_27_2013 APACrefauthors Owens, M J. , Challen, R. , Methven, J. , Henley, E. \ Jackson, D R. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . A 27 day persistence model of near- Earth solar wind conditions: A long lead-time forecast and a benchmark for dynamical models A 27 day persistence model ...

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    , Horbury, T S

    owens_ensemble_2014 APACrefauthors Owens, M J. , Horbury, T S. , Wicks, R T. , McGregor, S L. , Savani, N P. \ Xiong, M. APACrefauthors \ 2014 06 . Ensemble downscaling in coupled solar wind-magnetosphere modeling for space weather forecasting Ensemble downscaling in coupled s...

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    Similar Day

    owens_probabilistic_2017 APACrefauthors Owens, M J. , Riley, P. \ Horbury, T S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 05 . Probabilistic Solar Wind and Geomagnetic Forecasting Using an Analogue Ensemble or " Similar Day " Approach Probabilistic Solar Wind and Geomagnetic Forecasting Using an ...

    2017

  21. [29]

    \ Linares, R

    parker_satellite_2024 APACrefauthors Parker, W E. \ Linares, R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 08 . Satellite Drag Analysis During the May 2024 Gannon Geomagnetic Storm Satellite Drag Analysis During the May 2024 Gannon Geomagnetic Storm . Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets . APACrefURL...

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    , Al-Haddad, N

    regnault_discrepancies_2024 APACrefauthors Regnault, F. , Al-Haddad, N. , Lugaz, N. , Farrugia, C J. , Yu, W. , Zhuang, B. \ Davies, E E. APACrefauthors \ 2024 02 . Discrepancies in the Properties of a Coronal Mass Ejection on Scales of 0.03 au as Revealed by Simultaneous Meas...

    2024

  23. [31]

    , Ben-Nun, M

    riley_forecasting_2017 APACrefauthors Riley, P. , Ben-Nun, M. , Linker, J A. , Owens, M J. \ Horbury, T S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Forecasting the properties of the solar wind using simple pattern recognition Forecasting the properties of the solar wind using simple pattern re...

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    , Klein, L W

    roberts_nature_1987 APACrefauthors Roberts, D A. , Klein, L W. , Goldstein, M L. \ Matthaeus, W H. APACrefauthors \ 1987 . The nature and evolution of magnetohydrodynamic fluctuations in the solar wind: Voyager observations The nature and evolution of magnetohydrodynamic fluct...

    1987 doi

  25. [33]

    , Hadid, L

    sahraoui_magnetohydrodynamic_2020 APACrefauthors Sahraoui, F. , Hadid, L. \ Huang, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 12 . Magnetohydrodynamic and kinetic scale turbulence in the near- Earth space plasmas: a (short) biased review Magnetohydrodynamic and kinetic scale turbulence in the n...

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    \ Murphy, K R

    sibeck_quantifying_2025 APACrefauthors Sibeck, D G. \ Murphy, K R. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Quantifying the Effects of Solar Wind Fluctuations on the Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Interaction Quantifying the Effects of Solar Wind Fluctuations on the Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Inte...

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025 1

    simon_wind_2025 APACrefauthors Simon, P A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 1 . WIND PLSP Analog Ensemble Analysis [ Dataset ]. WIND PLSP Analog Ensemble Analysis [ Dataset ]. Zenodo . APACrefURL APACrefURL

    2025

  28. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025 2

    simon_wind_2025-1 APACrefauthors Simon, P A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 2 . WIND PLSP Analog Ensemble Analysis [workflow]. WIND PLSP Analog Ensemble Analysis [workflow]. APACrefURL APACrefURL

    2025

  29. [37]

    , Veenadhari, B

    tulasi_ram_super-intense_2024 APACrefauthors Tulasi Ram, S. , Veenadhari, B. , Dimri, A P. , Bulusu, J. , Bagiya, M. , Gurubaran, S. Vichare, G. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Super- Intense Geomagnetic Storm on 10–11 May 2024: Possible Mechanisms and Impacts Super- Intense Geomagnet...

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    , DeForest, C E

    viall_mesoscale_2021 APACrefauthors Viall, N M. , DeForest, C E. \ Kepko, L. APACrefauthors \ 2021 08 . Mesoscale Structure in the Solar Wind Mesoscale Structure in the Solar Wind . Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8 . APACrefURL [ 2024-06-15 ]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10....

    2021

  31. [39]

    , Owens, M J

    wicks_variation_2010 APACrefauthors Wicks, R T. , Owens, M J. \ Horbury, T S. APACrefauthors \ 2010 03 . The Variation of Solar Wind Correlation Lengths Over Three Solar Cycles The Variation of Solar Wind Correlation Lengths Over Three Solar Cycles . Sol Phys 262 1 191--198 . ...

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    , Brosius, A L

    wilson_iii_quarter_2021 APACrefauthors Wilson III, L B. , Brosius, A L. , Gopalswamy, N. , Nieves-Chinchilla, T. , Szabo, A. , Hurley, K. TenBarge, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 05 . A Quarter Century of Wind Spacecraft Discoveries A Quarter Century of Wind Spacecraft Discoveries...

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    \ Tong, H

    yao_initial-condition_1995 APACrefauthors Yao, Q. \ Tong, H. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . On initial-condition sensitivity and prediction in nonlinear stochastic systems On initial-condition sensitivity and prediction in nonlinear stochastic systems . Bulletin of the International ...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.