Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

K-essence sources of Kerr-Schild spacetimes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A minimally coupled k-essence scalar can source Kerr–Schild spacetimes only if its Lagrangian is at most quadratic in the kinetic term, and only linear when linearized solutions must be exact.

desk verdict Clean classification of k-essence sources of Kerr-Schild spacetimes; the scalar equation worry is a red herring once you use the Bianchi identity. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14229 v1 pith:6SAJBIKN submitted 2025-04-19 gr-qc

Bence Juhász , László Árpád Gergely This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C1583C5783D05
keywords k-essenceKerr-Schildspacetimesscalar-tensortheoriesnullcongruencekinetictermlinearizedfieldequationsexactsolutionsblackholesources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which k-essence scalar-tensor theories can serve as matter sources for Kerr–Schild spacetimes, the family of metrics built by adding a null-vector term $\lambda l_a l_b$ to a seed metric and containing many black-hole and radiating solutions. The authors prove that a minimally coupled k-essence Lagrangian can do the job only if it is at most quadratic in the kinetic term $X$; if the null congruence is autoparallel, linearity is forced, and demanding that a linearized solution of the field equations also solve the full nonlinear system likewise forces linearity, with one exception. That exception is a scalar field constant along the congruence, whose Lagrangian remains unrestricted. The result gives a practical rule for generating exact Kerr–Schild solutions from linearized calculations and for deciding which k-essence models can enter them.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Kerr–Schild map $\tilde{g}_{ab}=g_{ab}+\lambda l_a l_b$, which adds a null-vector term along a null congruence $l_a$ to a seed metric; the difference between the Ricci tensors of the seed and deformed spacetimes is a power series in $\lambda$ that stops at third order. The k-essence sector is a scalar field with Lagrangian $\sqrt{-g}F(\varphi,X)$, where $X=-\tfrac12 g^{ab}\nabla_a\varphi\nabla_b\varphi$, and its energy–momentum tensor is $T_{ab}=F_X\nabla_a\varphi\nabla_b\varphi+g_{ab}F$. Under the map the kinetic term becomes $X+\lambda X^{(1)}$, with $X^{(1)}=\tfrac12(D\varphi)^2$, so expanding $F$ in powers of $\lambda$ turns the vanishing of higher-order source terms into derivative conditions $F_{X^k}=0$; those conditions force $F$ to be at most quadratic in $X$, and the autoparallel or exactness conditions reduce the degree to one.

What would settle it

Check whether a k-essence Lagrangian cubic in $X$ can produce a vanishing order-$\lambda^4$ source term $T^{(4)}_{ab}$ for some nonconstant seed scalar; Theorem 1 predicts that $T^{(4)}_{ab}\neq 0$ whenever $X^{(1)}\neq 0$, so any explicit cubic model satisfying the field equations at that order would falsify the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a classification of minimally coupled k-essence scalar fields that can source Kerr–Schild spacetimes. To source any such spacetime, the Lagrangian must be at most quadratic in the kinetic term, $F(\varphi,X)=A(\varphi)X^2+B(\varphi)X-V(\varphi)$. When the null congruence is autoparallel, only the linear Lagrangian $F(\varphi,X)=B(\varphi)X-V(\varphi)$ survives. And if a solution of the field equations linearized in the Kerr–Schild parameter must also be an exact solution for arbitrary parameter values, the Lagrangian must again be linear unless the scalar field is constant along the null congruence, in which case every functional form of $F$ is admissible.

Load-bearing premise

The argument holds the scalar field configuration fixed while the metric is deformed by the Kerr–Schild map, so the new energy–momentum tensor is obtained by substituting the deformed metric into the original Lagrangian; if the scalar field had to be solved afresh from its own equation of motion in the new spacetime, the allowed Lagrangians could be different.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quadratic k-essence models, including dilatonic ghost condensate and unified dark-matter/dark-energy Lagrangians, are the only nonlinear k-essence candidates for sourcing Kerr–Schild spacetimes.
  • For autoparallel congruences, which include many standard black-hole and radiating setups, only linear Lagrangians of the form $F=B(\varphi)X-V(\varphi)$ can source the geometry.
  • For linear Lagrangians, any solution of the linearized field equations automatically gives an exact Kerr–Schild solution for all values of the Kerr–Schild parameter.
  • Inside a horizon the allowed k-essence behaves as a perfect fluid and outside as an anisotropic fluid, and the sound-speed formulas give stability conditions $c_s^2\ge 0$ constraining the functions $A$ and $B$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would repeat the coefficient counting for broader scalar-tensor families with derivative interactions; the extra terms would shift the polynomial degree forced by the vanishing higher-order sources, so the quadratic/linear dichotomy may not persist.
  • The unicity result suggests a constructive recipe: solve the linearized field equations with a linear k-essence Lagrangian, and the Kerr–Schild parameter can then be promoted to finite values without solving the full nonlinear system.
  • For dynamical black-hole scenarios, the anisotropic-fluid picture outside the horizon implies that radial sound perturbations may become unstable for certain parameter pairs; comparing those stability windows with observations of shadows or accretion flows could indirectly constrain the allowed k-essence functions.
  • If a Kerr–Schild seed with nontrivial scalar hair is eventually constructed despite the no-hair theorems, the classification in this paper identifies the only Lagrangians that could sustain it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies Kerr–Schild maps g̃_ab = g_ab + λ l_a l_b in minimally coupled k-essence theories, keeping the scalar field φ fixed and replacing X by X̃ = X + (λ/2)(Dφ)^2. It claims: (1) if a Kerr–Schild spacetime is sourced by such a k-essence field, F(φ,X) must be at most quadratic in X (§III.A); (2) for an autoparallel null congruence this reduces to F = B(φ)X − V(φ) (§III.C); (3) requiring the linearized solution to be exact forces the Lagrangian to be linear, except when φ is constant along the congruence, in which case F is unrestricted (§§IV–V). The proofs are explicit modulo the use of the truncation theorem of Ref. [6]. Section VI discusses black-hole and cosmological interpretations.

Significance. The classification is sharp and, under the fixed-scalar-field interpretation of the Kerr–Schild map, non-obvious; excluding higher-than-quadratic k-essence Lagrangians is a concrete and useful restriction for solution-generating applications. The paper presents the material as a sequence of theorems with worked index manipulations, and Theorem 3 correctly isolates the degenerate case Dφ=0. Its value is tempered, however, by the fact that the headline result is conditional on an assumption that is not stated in the abstract, and by the heavy reliance on the author's earlier truncation theorem, which is not reproduced. With a precise statement of the hypotheses and a clear sufficiency check, the result would be a solid specialized contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II.B, Eq. (16); abstract] The assumption that the scalar field is unaffected by the Kerr–Schild transformation is introduced without discussion and is not reflected in the abstract or in the statements of Theorems 1–3. The theorems classify Lagrangians for which a Kerr–Schild map with fixed φ sends a seed solution to another solution with the same φ; they do not classify all k-essence sources of Kerr–Schild metrics, because a generic candidate source would require solving for a new scalar field φ̃ together with the metric. To keep the main claim, the authors must either prove that any Kerr–Schild k-essence source can be obtained with an unchanged scalar field, or restate the main results explicitly as conditional on the fixed-φ map. As written, the abstract's 'in order to source a Kerr–Schild type spacetime' is stronger than what the proof establishes.
  2. [§III.A–III.B, Eqs. (8), (17)–(25)] The paper never writes or imposes the scalar equation of motion in the transformed spacetime. If the full Einstein equations held exactly, the Bianchi identity would give ∇̃_a T̃^{ab}=0, which for the energy-momentum tensor (13) implies the scalar equation whenever ∇φ≠0; but the paper does not establish that the truncation conditions obtained from Ref. [6] are sufficient for the metric Einstein equations to hold at every order. Consequently, the statement in Section III.B that k-essence models with quadratic Lagrangian 'source spacetimes of Kerr–Schild type' remains a necessary-condition argument unless a sufficiency proof is supplied. The authors should either prove that the truncated expansion solves Eq. (8) exactly, or explicitly limit their claims to necessary conditions.
  3. [§III.A, Theorem 1 and Eq. (24)] The proof of Theorem 1 and the resulting quadratic form (24) rest entirely on the theorem from Ref. [6] that the source expansion must terminate at third order. This theorem is used as a black box, and the paper does not state its precise hypotheses or verify that the k-essence energy-momentum tensor (16) satisfies them. In particular, it is unclear whether the theorem is necessary, sufficient, or both, and whether it presupposes divergence-freeness or on-shell matter. Since the central classification depends on this input, the authors should quote the exact theorem and check the hypotheses, or include a proof tailored to the k-essence case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The final sentence should explicitly say 'constant along the integral curves of an autoparallel Kerr–Schild congruence', since Theorem 3 carries that assumption.
  2. [Eq. (22)] The expression √(2X^(1)) should be written |Dφ|, since Dφ = l^a∇_aφ can be signed.
  3. [Eq. (20)] Please spell out that ∂/∂X acts only on F_{X^k}, not on (X^(1))^k; the notation is easy to misread.
  4. [§VI.B] The remark 'd(s/n)=0 yields dφ=0' is cryptic and deserves a short derivation or a more precise reference.
  5. [§VII] The sentence 'The proof of the theorem omitted one special case' is misleading because Section V actually proves that case; the wording should be revised to say that the case is treated separately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the k-essence classification follows from an independent prior Kerr–Schild source theorem, and the restriction to quadratic/linear F is not fed into the proof.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Its central input is the theorem from Ref. [6] stating that, for a generic seed metric and energy-momentum tensor, the Kerr–Schild expansion of the source terminates at third order (T^(k)_ab = 0 for k >= 4), with T^(3)_ab = 0 for autoparallel congruences, and that the linearized-to-exact condition is T^(2)_ab = l_(a T^(1)_b)c l^c. This is a parameter-free, previously published result that does not assume k-essence or any restriction on the Lagrangian F(φ,X); it is therefore legitimate independent support even though one of the authors is also the author of Ref. [6]. The paper then computes the k-essence contributions T^(k)_ab by direct substitution of the Kerr–Schild metric into F(φ,X) and its X-derivative, Eqs. (14)-(20). Theorem 1 is an induction that propagates the vanishing of T^(4)_ab; it does not assume the desired conclusion that F is quadratic. Imposing the Ref. [6] vanishing conditions yields F quadratic in X, and adding the autoparallel condition T^(3)_ab = 0 gives F linear in X. The unicity argument in Section IV combines the Ref. [6] conditions with the explicit quadratic T^(3)_ab and solves consistently for A(φ); the contradiction obtained for non-autoparallel congruences is a genuine derivation, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. Section V explicitly treats the exceptional case of a scalar constant along the congruence. The concern that the scalar field is held fixed under the map and its equation of motion is not re-imposed is a physical-completeness question, not circularity, because the paper's classification is conditional on the metric-side energy-momentum source and does not insert the target result into the premises. Accordingly, no circular step is present and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper has no fitted parameters. Its axioms are: (i) the truncation theorem for Kerr-Schild sources from the authors' earlier work (Ref. [6]), (ii) the fixed-scalar-field assumption under the metric transformation, and (iii) smoothness of F to justify Taylor expansion. There are no invented entities.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Kerr-Schild transformed energy-momentum tensor must have vanishing expansion coefficients T^{(k)}_{ab}=0 for k≥4 (and k=3 when the congruence is autoparallel), as proven in Ref. [6].
    The paper's central classification relies on this theorem from the first author's 2002 paper without re-deriving it. If the theorem has hidden assumptions about the matter, the classification could change. Location: Section II.A, Eq. (8) and text after Eq. (20).
  • domain assumption The k-essence scalar field φ is unchanged by the Kerr-Schild map; the transformed energy-momentum tensor is obtained by substituting the transformed metric into Eq. (13).
    This modeling choice is standard in Kerr-Schild 'metric generates matter' constructions but is not derived from the scalar equation of motion. Location: Section II.B, Eqs. (14)-(16).
  • domain assumption The function F(φ,X) is smooth enough to admit the Taylor expansions (17)-(18) in λ.
    The necessity proof uses power series. Physical Lagrangians are typically smooth. Location: Section III.A, Eqs. (17)-(18).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of K-essence sources of Kerr-Schild spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6SAJBIKN

@misc{pith2026250414229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: K-essence sources of Kerr-Schild spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6SAJBIKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14229}
}
read the original abstract

We extend a result by one of the authors, established for nonvacuum Einstein gravity, to minimally coupled k-essence scalar-tensor theories. First we prove that in order to source a Kerr-Schild type spacetime, the k-essence Lagrangian should be at most quadratic in the kinetic term. This is reduced to linear dependence when the Kerr-Schild null congruence is autoparallel. Finally, we show that requiring the solutions of the Einstein equations linearized in Kerr-Schild type perturbations to also solve the full nonlinear system of Einstein equations, selects once again k-essence scalar fields with Lagrangians linear in the kinetic term. The only other k-essence sharing the property of sourcing perturbative Kerr-Schild spacetimes which are also exact, is the scalar field constant along the integral curves of the Kerr-Schild congruence, with otherwise unrestricted Lagrangian.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    L. ´A. Gergely and Z. Perj´ es, Vacuum Kerr-Schild metrics gener ated by nontwisting congru- ences, Ann. Physik 3, 609 (1994) [arXiv:gr-qc/0203091]. 17

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  2. [1]

    For the quadratic case (24) the energy density and isotropic pressure become ρin = 3 A (φ) X 2 + B (φ) X + V (φ) , pin = A (φ) X 2 + B (φ) X − V (φ)

    Inside the horizon The scalar field trapped inside the horizon mimics a perfect fluid with en ergy density ρin = 2 XF X − F and isotropic pressure pin = F . For the quadratic case (24) the energy density and isotropic pressure become ρin = 3 A (φ) X 2 + B (φ) X + V (φ) , pin = A (φ) X 2 + B (φ) X − V (φ) . (49) These contribute to the gravitational attracti...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Outside the horizon In this case the scalar is equivalent to an anisotropic fluid with energy density equal to the tangential pressures ρout = pt out = F and radial pressure pr out = F − 2XF X, which in the quadratic case (24) become ρout = pt out = A (φ) X 2 + B (φ) X − V (φ) , pr out = −3A (φ) X 2 − B (φ) X − V (φ) , (52) 14 resulting in wr out = pr out ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. Maccallum, C. Hoenselaers, an d E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, Cambridge University Press, 4 85 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    L. ´A. Gergely and Z. Perj´ es, Kerr-Schild metrics revisited I. The ground state, J. Math. Phys. 35, 2438 (1994) [arXiv:gr-qc/0203088]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  6. [5]

    L. ´A. Gergely and Z. Perj´ es, Kerr-Schild metrics revisited II . The complete vacuum solution, J. Math. Phys. 35, 2448 (1994) [arXiv:gr-qc/0203090]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    B. C. Xanthopoulos, Exact vacuum solutions of Einstein’ s equation from linearized solutions, J. Math. Phys 19, 1607 (1978)

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    L. ´A. Gergely, Linear Einstein equations and Kerr-Schild maps , Class. Quantum Grav. 19, 2515 (2002) [arXiv:gr-qc/0203101]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class

    E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 243001 (2015) [arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    G¨ urses and C ¸

    M. G¨ urses and C ¸ . S ¸ent¨ urk, A Modified Gravity Theory: Null Aether, Commun. Theor. Phys. 71, 312 (2019) [arXiv:1604.02266 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    G¨ urses, Y

    M. G¨ urses, Y. Heydarzade, and C ¸ . S ¸ent¨ urk, Kerr–Schild–Kundt metrics in generic gravity theories with modified Horndeski couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1147 (2021) [arXiv:2109.01244 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    G. W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equa tions in a four-dimensional space, In- ternational Journal of Theoretical Physics. 10(6), 363-384 (1974)

    1974

  5. [13]

    Deffayet, X

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer, and G. Zahariade, From k-e ssence to generalized Galileons, Phys. Rev. D. 84, 064039 (2011) [arXiv:1103.3260 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations, Fermi Gamma- ray burst monitor, and INTEGRAL, Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron St ar Merger: GW170817 and GRB170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Baker, E

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller , and I. Sawicki, Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Phys . Rev. Lett. 119, 251301 (2017) [arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Dark Energy afte r GW170817: Dead ends and the road ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251304 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Creminelli and F

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Dark Energy after GW1708 17 and GRB170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251302 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Sakstein and B

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Implications of the Neutron Sta r Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251303 (2017) [arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Deffayet, O

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, Imperf ect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding, JCAP 1010, 026 (2010) [arXiv:1008.0048 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Armendariz-Picon, T

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour, and V. Mukhanov, k-Infl ation, Phys. Lett. B458, 209 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9904075]. 18

    1999 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt , A Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cosmological Constant and Late-Time Cosm ic Acceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0004134]

    2000 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhar dt, Essentials of k-essence Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0006373]

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    E. A. Lim, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, Dust of Dark Energy, JCAP 2010, 05:012, (2010) [arXiv:1003.5751 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Luongo and M

    O. Luongo and M. Muccino, Speeding up the universe using dust with pressure, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103520 (2018) [arXiv:1807.00180 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    D’Agostino, O

    R. D’Agostino, O. Luongo, and M. Muccino, Healing the co smological constant problem during inflation through a unified quasi-quintessence matter field, Class. Quantum Grav. 39, 195014 (2022) [arXiv:2204.02190 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Luongo and T

    O. Luongo and T. Mengoni, Generalized K-essence inflati on in Jordan and Einstein frames, Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 105006 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Akhoury, D

    R. Akhoury, D. Garfinkle, and R. Saotome, Gravitational collapse of k-essence, J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 096, (2011) [arXiv:1103.0290 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Manna, P

    G. Manna, P. Majumdar, and B. Majumder, k-essence emerg ent spacetime as a generalized Vaidya geometry, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124034 (2020) [arXiv:1909.07224 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Manna, Gravitational collapse for the K-essence eme rgent Vaidya spacetime, Eur

    G. Manna, Gravitational collapse for the K-essence eme rgent Vaidya spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 813, (2020) [arXiv:1911.11753 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Majumder, S

    B. Majumder, S. Ray, G. Manna, Evaporation of Dynamical Horizon with the Hawking Tem- perature in the K-essence Emergent Vaidya Spacetime, Forts chritte der Physik 71, 2300133 (2023) [arXiv:2007.16053 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kase and S

    R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, Dark energy in Horndeski theor ies after GW170817: A review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1942005 (2019) [arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Even t Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. L ett. 875, L6 (2019) [arXiv:1906.11243]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First Sagitta rius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of t he Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022) [arXiv:2311.08680]. 19

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Faraoni, Correspondence between a scalar field and an effective perfect fluid, Phys

    V. Faraoni, Correspondence between a scalar field and an effective perfect fluid, Phys. Rev. D 85, 024040 (2012) [arXiv:1201.1448 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gergely, Z

    C. Gergely, Z. Keresztes, and L. ´A. Gergely, Minimally coupled scalar fields as imperfect flui ds, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024044 (2020) [arXiv:2007.01326 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    O. F. Piattella, J. C. Fabris, and N. Bili´ c, Note on the t hermodynamics and the speed of sound of a scalar field, Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 055006 (2014) [arXiv:1309.4282 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Transcendence of the Law of Baryon-Nu mber Conservation in Black-Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 452 (1972)

    1972

  30. [38]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Nonexistence of Baryon Number for Sta tic Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 5, 1239 (1972)

    1972

  31. [39]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Nonexistence of Baryon Number for Bla ck Holes. II, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2403 (1972)

    1972

  32. [40]

    Sotiriou, Black holes and scalar fields, Class

    T.P. Sotiriou, Black holes and scalar fields, Class. Qua ntum Grav. 32, 214002 (2015) [arXiv:1505.00248 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. A. H. Graham and R. Jha, Nonexistence of black holes wi th noncanonical scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084056 (2014) [arXiv:1401.8203 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    O. J. Tattersall, P. G. Ferreira, and M. Lagos, Speed of g ravitational waves and black hole hair, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084005 (2018) [arXiv:1802.08606 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Jacobson, Primordial black hole evolution in tensor -scalar cosmology, Phys.Rev.Lett

    T. Jacobson, Primordial black hole evolution in tensor -scalar cosmology, Phys.Rev.Lett. 83, 2699, (1999) [arXiv: astro-ph/9905303]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Horbatsch and C.P

    M.W. Horbatsch and C.P. Burgess, Cosmic black-hole hai r growth and quasar OJ287, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1205, 010 (2012) [arXiv:1111.4009 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Akyar and ¨O

    L. Akyar and ¨O. Delice, On generalized Einstein-Rosen waves in Brans-Di cke theory, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 226 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Piazza and S

    F. Piazza and S. Tsujikawa, Dilatonic ghost condensate as dark energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0407, 004 (2004) [hep-th/0405054]

    2004 arXiv

  39. [47]

    R. J. Scherrer, Purely kinetic k-essence as unified dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 011301 (2004) [astro-ph/0402316]

    2004 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Racsk´ o and L

    B. Racsk´ o and L. ´A. Gergely, The Lanczos Equation on Light-Like Hypersurfac es in a Cos- mologically Viable Class of Kinetic Gravity Braiding Theor ies, Symmetry 11, 616 (2019) [arXiv:2006.13247 [gr-qc]]. 20

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.