Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 124 references

The Role of Flexoelectric Coupling and Chemical Strains in the Emergence of Polar Chiral Nano-Structures

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that anisotropic flexoelectric coupling controls the polarity, chirality, and morphology of polar domain structures, turning labyrinthine mazes into spirals and stabilizing meron-like flexons.

desk verdict An invited review that competently synthesizes the authors' own earlier results; its predictions hinge on flexoelectric coefficients that are asserted rather than independently constrained. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14317 v3 pith:2VGHFSB6 submitted 2025-04-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords flexoelectriceffectchiralpolarizationstructuresflexonslabyrinthinedomainsnegativecapacitancecore-shellferroelectricnanoparticleschemicalstrainsvanderWaalsferrielectrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review tries to establish that the flexoelectric effect—polarization generated by strain gradients, and its inverse—is a controlling factor for chiral polarization textures in nanoscale ferroelectrics. It argues that increasing flexoelectric coupling gradually transforms fine branched labyrinthine domains into thicker spiral-like domains, and that an anisotropic flexoelectric tensor stabilizes meron-like chiral states called flexons. It further claims that flexoelectricity combined with chemical strains and ionic-electronic surface screening produces chiral domain morphologies and negative-capacitance states in van der Waals ferrielectric nanoflakes. If these predictions hold, strain gradients and defect chemistry become practical design knobs for chiral ferroelectric nanostructures, with potential applications in memory, cryptography, and low-power transistors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the flexoelectric coupling term in the Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy, written as a Lifshitz invariant that couples polarization gradients to strain or stress gradients, namely $\frac{f_{ijkl}}{2}(P_l \partial u_{ij}/\partial x_k - u_{ij}\partial P_l/\partial x_k)$. The argument is carried by finite-element simulations that vary the anisotropic flexoelectric tensor components, such as $F_{11}$, $F_{12}$, and $F_{44}$, and track the resulting polarization morphology, together with models of chemical strains from defects and the Stephenson-Highland surface-charge description of ionic screening. This machinery turns flexoelectric coefficients, surface screening, and defect-induced strains into a phase diagram of polar textures, including mazes, spirals, flexons, and negative-capacitance states.

What would settle it

Measure the full anisotropic flexoelectric tensor of Sn2P2S6 and CuInP2S6—for example, through controlled bending or strain-gradient experiments at the nanoscale—and compare with the assumed values such as $F_{11}=3$, $F_{12}=2.7$, $F_{44}=9$ ($10^{-11}$ m$^3$/C) for Sn2P2S6; if the measured components come out an order of magnitude smaller, the predicted chiral morphologies and negative-capacitance states would not appear at the stated particle sizes and screening lengths.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that flexoelectric coupling, especially its anisotropy, controls the polarity, chirality, and morphology of polar domain structures. In uniaxial ferroelectric core-shell nanoparticles, the simulations show that increasing the flexoelectric coefficients gradually converts sinuous branched maze domains into larger-scale spiral-like domains, a transition that is insensitive to the sign of the flexoelectric tensor but sensitive to its anisotropy. In BaTiO3 nanocylinders and thin films, the anisotropic flexoelectric effect stabilizes flexons—meron-like polarization textures with two oppositely oriented diffuse axial domains near the cylinder ends separated by a zero-axial-polarization region—whose chirality switches when the sign of the corresponding flexoelectric coefficient is reversed. In CuInP2S6 nanoflakes, flexo-chemical coupling and surface screening stabilize chiral tubular domain patterns and produce a paraelectric-like state with pronounced negative differential capacitance over a wide range of thicknesses, strains, and surface charge densities.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations depend on assumed values and signs of anisotropic flexoelectric coefficients that are among the least constrained parameters in ferroelectrics; if the real coefficients are much smaller or differently anisotropic, the predicted maze-to-spiral transition, flexons, and sign-controlled chirality would not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Increasing flexoelectric coupling strength gradually changes branched sinuous maze domains into larger-scale spiral-like domains in uniaxial ferroelectric core-shell nanoparticles, with the transition insensitive to the sign of the flexoelectric tensor but sensitive to its anisotropy.
  • Reversing the sign of the flexoelectric coefficient switches the chirality of flexon states and flexo-sensitive vortices, providing a strain-gradient route to writing left- or right-handed polarization textures.
  • Combined flexo-chemical coupling—flexoelectricity plus chemical strains from defects—can shift the effective Curie temperature and stabilize chiral morphologies in core-shell nanoparticles and van der Waals ferrielectric nanoflakes.
  • The paraelectric-like state of CuInP2S6 nanoflakes covered by ionic-electronic screening exhibits negative differential capacitance over a wide range of thicknesses, strains, and surface charge densities, making it relevant for low-power transistor technologies.
  • Multiple-degenerate labyrinthine states may correspond to a negative-capacitance state stabilized by a screening shell, with potential applications in nanoelectronics and cryptography.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sensitivity to flexoelectric anisotropy is generic, then systematically scanning the ratio $F_{11}:F_{12}:F_{44}$ in simulations should reveal a chirality map—handedness and spiral pitch—that the paper leaves for future work.
  • Because flexons resemble chiral bobber structures in magnetism, experimental techniques developed for magnetic skyrmions and bobbers, such as topological-charge counting and Lorentz-type imaging, could be adapted to detect and manipulate ferroelectric flexons.
  • The predicted negative-capacitance state tied to degenerate labyrinthine states implies history-dependent capacitance; measuring capacitance-voltage hysteresis or capacitance noise in core-shell ferroelectric nanoparticles would be a direct test.
  • Flexo-chemical coupling suggests that ion intercalation or vacancy engineering could reversibly write chiral polarization textures, potentially connecting to neuromorphic and cryptographic devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript, framed as an invited review for a JAP Special Topic, argues that flexoelectric coupling—particularly its anisotropy—controls the polarity, chirality, and morphology of polar domain structures in ferroelectric nanostructures. It combines Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire (LGD) free-energy modeling and finite-element simulations, largely adapted from the authors' prior papers, to support three central claims: (i) increasing flexoelectric coupling gradually transforms branched labyrinthine mazes into thicker spiral-like domains in uniaxial Sn2P2S6 core-shell nanoparticles (Figs. 4-6); (ii) flexoelectric and flexo-chemical coupling stabilize meron-like chiral "flexon" states in BaTiO3 nanocylinders (Figs. 1 and 7); and (iii) flexo-chemical coupling, together with ionic screening, produces sign-controlled chiral morphologies and negative capacitance states in CuInP2S6 nanoflakes (Figs. 8-9). The paper also discusses applications such as 3D RAM, cryptography, and negative-capacitance transistors.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the paper identifies flexoelectric coefficients and chemical strains as practical design knobs for chiral ferroelectric nanostructures, an idea that goes beyond the usual electrostatic or strain-engineering routes. The strengths of the manuscript are its use of a standard LGD framework, concrete material-specific predictions, a quantitative topological index n(y) for chirality, and a broad synthesis of the authors' prior body of work. The predictions are in principle falsifiable by piezoresponse force microscopy and nonlinear optical microscopy. However, the evidence is conditional: the key effects appear at specific large flexoelectric coefficient values imported from prior papers, and the morphology transitions are described from visual inspection of a small number of snapshots without quantitative metrics, error bars, or convergence tests. The significance is therefore real but currently prospective rather than established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Figs. 4-6] The claimed gradual maze-to-spiral transition is supported only by visual inspection of four snapshots at Fij = 0, 1x, 2x, and 3x (Figs. 5 and 6). No quantitative measure of branching-point density, domain stripe width, chirality, or domain contrast is provided, and no averaging over random initial polarization configurations or mesh-convergence tests is reported. Because the words "gradual" and the statement that the transition is suppressed for R = 8 nm are central conclusions, please supply a quantitative order parameter with uncertainties and demonstrate convergence with respect to spatial discretization and initial conditions.
  2. [Figs. 5, 7, 8; Conclusions] The predicted flexons, the maze-to-spiral transition, and the sign-controlled chirality all rely on assumed large flexoelectric coefficients taken from the authors' prior work, e.g., F11 = 3, F12 = 2.7, F44 = 9 (in 10^-11 m3/C) for Sn2P2S6 in Fig. 5 and F33 = 14.4, F44 = -14.3, F55 = -14.9 (in 10^-11 m3/C) for CuInP2S6 in Fig. 8. Since the conclusion section attributes the morphology transition to a renormalization of the polarization gradient coefficients proportional to the second power of Fij, an order-of-magnitude reduction of these coefficients would make the Lifshitz term negligible and eliminate all reported effects. Please provide a sensitivity analysis over a physically plausible range of Fij, compare with independent measured or computed bounds, and clearly state the parameter uncertainty as a limitation if no independent bounds are available.
  3. [Methods / numerical implementation] The manuscript does not include a methods section or numerical implementation details: mesh size, element type, boundary conditions, time-stepping scheme, and solver settings are not given, and no code or data are released. Several displayed results appear to be new (e.g., Figs. 5, 6, and 8(b,d)), yet they cannot be reproduced or verified without these details. Please add a methods paragraph or a supplement containing the governing equations used in the FEM, boundary conditions, discretization parameters, and convergence checks.
  4. [Section around Fig. 5] The text states that the transition from branched mazes to spiral-like domains is insensitive to the sign of the flexoelectric coefficients, but no simulation with Fij -> -Fij is shown for the Sn2P2S6 system. Since the sign of Fij is elsewhere used to control chirality (Figs. 7 and 8), this sign-insensitivity claim needs direct numerical evidence, for example a comparison of +Fij and -Fij snapshots or a phase diagram in the space of flexoelectric sign and anisotropy.
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference [83] is dated 2025, but the cited article (Phys. Rev. B 92, 094106) corresponds to 2015; please correct the year.
  2. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and title describe the paper as a review, but the body includes original-looking FEM results (Figs. 5, 6, 8). Please clarify in the introduction which figures are new contributions and which are adapted from prior work, and state the added value of the review.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states that the left color scale corresponds to panel (a) and the right color scale also corresponds to panel (a); this is ambiguous and should be reworded to indicate clearly which scale applies to which panels.
  4. [Eqs. (4a)-(4c)] Equations (4a)-(4c) introduce u_s, u_c, u_m, u_t, and delta V, but u_s and u_c are not defined before the equations, and the Voigt convention for the strain components is not stated. Please define all symbols and the index convention explicitly.
  5. [Fig. 7(f)] The color scale for the relative capacitance Delta C is shown but not numerically annotated, which makes it difficult to locate the NC region (Delta C < 0) and the divergences near the phase boundary. Add numerical labels to the color scale.
  6. [References] Several references are duplicated: [25] and [72] are the same work, [86] and [88] are the same work, and [6] and [116] are the same work. Please consolidate the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's predictions are simulation outcomes from previously published models and are not fitted to, or defined by, the chiral structures they predict.

full rationale

This paper is a review that consolidates previously published FEM simulations by the same group, but that fact alone does not make the derivation circular. The load-bearing chain is: write a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy with a Lifshitz flexoelectric term (Eq. 1), choose material parameters including flexoelectric coefficients from prior work, solve for polarization distributions, and observe morphology changes as functions of flexoelectric coupling, chemical strain, and screening. No output quantity — the maze-to-spiral transition, flexon chirality, or the negative-capacitance region — is used to define or fit the input flexoelectric coefficients, so none of the predictions reduces to its inputs by construction. The flexoelectric coefficients Fij are assumed values that are admittedly uncertain, but parameter uncertainty is a correctness/robustness risk, not circularity; the chiral structures are not used to estimate those coefficients. The paper's self-citations, including Refs. [64], [66], [71], [73], [78], and [79], are references to prior peer-reviewed simulations with stated assumptions, not an invoked uniqueness theorem or an unverified premise that forbids alternatives. The terms 'flexon' and 'flexo-chemical coupling' are introduced by the authors, but they denote model outcomes and a composite physical mechanism, not disguised inputs. The paper also explicitly notes limitations, such as that the sensitivity to the flexoelectric tensor anisotropy 'requires further investigation' (Sec. 1, near Fig. 5) and that homogeneous mismatch strains do not generate flexo-mismatch coupling (footnote 128); these are honest scope statements rather than circular steps. Since no specific equation or fitted parameter can be exhibited as equivalent to a claimed prediction, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a standard LGD continuum free energy, on material parameters imported from the authors' prior papers, and on the postulate that chemical strains are shell-localized. Six control parameters, including three flexoelectric coefficient sets, chemical strain, mismatch strain, screening length, and surface activity, are varied by hand. The only named polar texture, the flexon, is inherited from Ref [64] and carries a falsifiable prediction but no experimental confirmation. No new fundamental entities are introduced by this paper.

free parameters (6)
  • Flexoelectric coefficients for Sn2P2S6 (F11, F12, F44) = F11 = 1-3, F12 = 0.9-2.7, F44 = 3-9 (x10^-11 m3/C)
    Varied by hand in Figs. 5-6 to drive the maze-to-spiral transition; not fitted to experimental data.
  • Flexoelectric coefficients for CuInP2S6 (F13, F23, F33, F44, F55) = F13=-1.61, F23=-1.78, F33=14.4, F44=-14.3, F55=-14.9 (x10^-11 m3/C)
    Model inputs for chiral morphology and negative capacitance states in Fig. 8; taken from Ref [79] without independent verification here.
  • Effective chemical strain delta_u (shell strain u_s) = 0 to 1%, including compressive -1%
    Control parameter in Eq. (4) and Figs. 7-8; chosen to illustrate flexo-chemical coupling and negative capacitance phase boundaries.
  • Screening length lambda (surface ionic charge) = 1 pm to 0.1 nm; examples: 9, 4.4, 3 pm
    Sets surface screening that stabilizes labyrinths and flexons; values from prior papers and varied in simulations.
  • Surface charge activity a_i (Langmuir isotherm) = 0 to 1, with widest negative capacitance range for a_i < 10^-2
    Parameter in Eq. (5) used to map negative capacitance regions in Fig. 8(f).
  • Mismatch strain u_m = 0 to 0.5% (e.g., 0.1%, 0.5%)
    Input strain at the core-shell or flake-substrate interface; varied to control domain morphology.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire free energy with the flexoelectric Lifshitz invariant (Eq. 1) is a valid continuum description of polarization at the nanoscale.
    All FEM and analytical results in Sections 1-2 are derived from this energy; no comparison with atomistic simulations is given.
  • domain assumption Material parameter sets for BaTiO3, Sn2P2S6, and CuInP2S6 used in the simulations are accurate enough.
    Figures 1-9 import parameters from Refs [64], [71], [78], [79]; no uncertainty or sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • domain assumption Elastic defects and chemical strains are localized in the shell, so delta_u = u_s and u_c = 0 in Eq. (4).
    This localization is stated below Eq. (4) and is a boundary condition for all flexo-chemical coupling calculations.
  • domain assumption The Stephenson-Highland Langmuir adsorption isotherm (Eq. 5) describes ionic-electronic screening on CuInP2S6 nanoflakes.
    Used to define the screening length and to compute negative capacitance phase maps in Section 2 and Fig. 8.
  • standard math The topological index n(y) (Eq. 2) measures chirality of the polarization field.
    Used in Fig. 2(f) to link the flexoelectric sign to chirality reversal.
invented entities (1)
  • Flexon (meron-like chiral polarization texture) independent evidence
    purpose: Describes a polarization state in ferroelectric nanocylinders with two diffuse axial domains and an azimuthal vortex, claimed to be stabilized by anisotropic flexoelectric coupling.
    Not introduced in this paper (coined in Ref [64]) but central to the review. It has a falsifiable prediction: flexons should exist in BaTiO3 nanocylinders over 200-400 K and be observable by piezoresponse force microscopy or nonlinear optical microscopy. No experiment is cited.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Role of Flexoelectric Coupling and Chemical Strains in the Emergence of Polar Chiral Nano-Structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2VGHFSB6

@misc{pith2026250414317,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Role of Flexoelectric Coupling and Chemical Strains in the Emergence of Polar Chiral Nano-Structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2VGHFSB6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14317}
}
read the original abstract

This review examines the conditions that lead to the formation of flexo-sensitive chiral polar structures in thin films and core-shell ferroelectric nanoparticles. It also analyzes possible mechanisms by which the flexoelectric effect impacts the polarization structure in core-shell ferroelectric nanoparticles. Special attention is given to the role of the anisotropic flexoelectric effect in forming a unique type of polarization states with distinct chiral properties, referred to as "flexons". In the first part of the review, we study the influence of the flexoelectric coupling on the polarity, chirality and branching of metastable labyrinthine domain structures in uniaxial ferroelectric core-shell nanoparticles. We reveal that the transition from sinuous branched domain stripes to spiral-like domains occurs gradually as the flexoelectric coupling strength is increased. Our findings indicate that the joint action of flexoelectric effect and chemical strains, termed as "flexo-chemical" coupling, can significantly influence the effective Curie temperature, polarization distribution, domain morphology, and chirality in multiaxial ferroelectric core-shell nanoparticles. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the combination of flexo-chemical coupling and screening effects leads to the appearance and stabilization of a chiral polarization morphology in nanoflakes of van der Waals ferrielectrics. In the second part of the review, we discuss several advanced applications of flexo-sensitive chiral polar structures in core-shell ferroelectric nanoparticles for nanoelectronics elements and cryptography. We underline the possibilities of the flexoelectric control of multiple-degenerated labyrinthine states, which may correspond to a differential negative capacitance (NC) state stabilized in the uniaxial ferroelectric core by the presence of a screening shell.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14317 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. FIGURE 4. Flexoelectric control of mazes polarity in core [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. F. Devonshire, Theory of ferroelectrics, Adv. Phys. 3, 85 (1954); https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101173

  2. [2]

    J. F. Scott, Applications of modern ferroelectrics Science 315, 954 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129564

  3. [3]

    K. M. Rabe, C. H. Ahn, and J.-M. Triscone, Editors, Physics of Ferroelectrics, 1st ed. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007); ISBN 978-3-540-34590-09

  4. [4]

    A. K. Tagantsev, L. E. Cross, and J. Fousek, Domains in Ferroic Crystals and Thin Films, 1st ed. (Springer New York, NY, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1417-0

  5. [5]

    S. V. Kalinin, Y. Kim, D. Fong, and A. N. Morozovska, Surface-screening mechanisms in ferroelectric thin films and their effect on polarization dynamics and domain structures, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 036502 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa915a

  6. [7]

    Junquera, Y

    J. Junquera, Y. Nahas, S. Prokhorenko, L. Bellaiche, J. Íñiguez, D.G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, S. Salahuddin, D.A. Muller, L.W. Martin, R. Ramesh. Topological phases in polar oxide nanostructures. Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 025001 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025001

  7. [8]

    I. A. Luk’yanchuk, A. G. Razumnaya, S. Kondovych, Y. A. Tikhonov, B. Khesin, and V. M. Vinokur. Topological foundations of ferroelectricity. Physics Reports 1110, 1-56 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.01.002 28

  8. [9]

    S. H. Zhuang and J.-M. Hu, Role of polarization-photon coupling in ultrafast terahertz excitation of ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140302 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L140302

Show all 124 references
  1. [10]

    T. Chen, B. Wang, Y. Zhu, S. Zhuang, L.-Q. Chen, and J.-M. Hu. Analytical model and dynamical phase-field simulation of terahertz transmission across ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 109, 094305 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.094305

  2. [11]

    J.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and L.-Q. Chen. Understanding, Predicting, and Designing Ferroelectric Domain Structures and Switching Guided by the Phase-Field Method. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 49, 127 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-121843

  3. [12]

    Gruverman, M

    A. Gruverman, M. Alexe, and D. Meier. Piezoresponse force microscopy and nanoferroic phenomena. Nat. Comm. 10, 1661 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09650-8

  4. [13]

    B. J. Rodriguez, X. S. Gao, L. F. Liu, W. Lee, I. I. Naumov, A. M. Bratkovsky, D. Hesse, and M. Alexe, Vortex polarization states in nanoscale ferroelectric arrays, Nano Lett. 9, 1127 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8036646

  5. [14]

    C. T. Nelson, B. Winchester, Y. Zhang, S. J. Kim, A. Melville, C. Adamo, C. M. Folkman, S. H. Baek, C. B. Eom, D. G. Schlom, L. Q. Chen, and X. Pan, Spontaneous vortex nanodomain arrays at ferroelectric heterointerfaces, Nano Lett. 11, 828 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1041808

  6. [15]

    Balke, B

    N. Balke, B. Winchester, W. Ren, Y. H. Chu, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, M. Huijben, R. K. Vasudevan, P. Maksymovych, J. Britson, S. Jesse, I. Kornev, R. Ramesh, L. Bellaiche, L. Q. Chen, and S. V. Kalinin, Enhanced electric conductivity at ferroelectric vortex cores in Bi...

  7. [16]

    A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S. L. Hsu, Z. Hong, J. D. Clarkson, C. M. Schlepütz, A. R. Damodaran, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, L. R. Dedon, D. Chen, A. Vishwanath, A. M. Minor, L. Q. Chen, J. F. Scott, L. W. Martin, and R. Ramesh, Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices...

  8. [17]

    S. Das, Y. L. Tang, Z. Hong, M. A. P. P. Gonçalves, M. R. McCarter, C. Klewe, K. X. Nguyen, F. Gómez-Ortiz, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, V. A. Stoica, S.-L. Hsu, B. Wang, C. Ophus, J. F. Liu, C. T. Nelson, S. Saremi, B. Prasad, A.B. Mei, D.G. Schlom, J. Íñiguez, P. García-Fernández...

  9. [18]

    Recent Advances in Topological Ferroics and Their Dynamics

    J. Hlinka, and P. Ondrejkovic. Skyrmions in ferroelectric materials. Solid State Physics, 70, 143 (2019), Chapter 4 in “Recent Advances in Topological Ferroics and Their Dynamics” Edited by Robert L. Stamps and Helmut Schulthei. Academic Press (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/b...

  10. [19]

    Nahas, S

    Y. Nahas, S. Prokhorenko, L. Louis, Z. Gui, I. Kornev, L. Bellaiche. Discovery of stable skyrmionic state in ferroelectric nanocomposites. Nat. Comm. 6, 8542 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9542

  11. [20]

    M. A. Pereira Gonçalves, C. Escorihuela-Sayalero, P. Garca-Fernández, J. Junquera, J. Íñiguez Theoretical guidelines to create and tune electric skyrmion bubbles. Science Advances 5, eaau7023 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7023 29

  12. [21]

    R. G. P. McQuaid, L. J. McGilly, P. Sharma, A. Gruverman, and J. M. Gregg, Mesoscale flux- closure domain formation in single-crystal BaTiO3, Nat. Commun. 2, 404 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1413

  13. [22]

    C.-L. Jia, K. W. Urban, M. Alexe, D. Hesse, and I. Vrejoiu, Direct observation of continuous electric dipole rotation in flux-closure domains in ferroelectric Pb (Zr, Ti)O3, Science, 331, 1420 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200605

  14. [23]

    Y. L. Tang, Y. L. Zhu, X. L. Ma, A. Y. Borisevich, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, W. Y. Wang, Y. J. Wang, Y. B. Xu, Z. D. Zhang, and S. J. Pennycook, Observation of a periodic array of flux-closure quadrants in strained ferroelectric PbTiO3 films, Science 348, 547 (2015); ht...

  15. [24]

    Zhang, L

    Q. Zhang, L. Xie, G. Liu, S. Prokhorenko, Y. Nahas, X. Pan, L. Bellaiche, A. Gruverman, N. Valanoor, Nanoscale bubble domains and topological transitions in ultrathin ferroelectric films, Adv. Mater. 29, 1702375 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702375

  16. [26]

    Nahas, S

    Y . Nahas, S. Prokhorenko, J. Fischer, B. Xu, C. Carrétéro, S. Prosandeev, M. Bibes, S. Fusil, B. Dkhil, V . Garcia, and L. Bellaiche, Inverse transition of labyrinthine domain patterns in ferroelectric thin films, Nature 577, 47 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1845-4

  17. [27]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, C. T. Nelson, and S. V. Kalinin. Intrinsic structural instabilities of domain walls driven by gradient couplings: meandering anferrodistortive-ferroelectric domain walls in BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014112 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

  18. [28]

    M. J. Han, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, Y. L. Zhu, Y. L. Tang, Y. J. Wang, X. W. Guo, X. L. Ma. Mapping gradient-driven morphological phase transition at the conductive domain walls of strained multiferroic films. Phys. Rev. B 100, 104109 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1103/Ph...

  19. [29]

    Y. Gu, M. Li, A.N. Morozovska, Y. Wang, E.A. Eliseev, V. Gopalan, and L.-Q. Chen. Non-Ising Character of a Ferroelectric Wall Arises from a Flexoelectric Effect. Phys. Rev. B 89, 174111 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.174111

  20. [30]

    Cherifi-Hertel, H

    S. Cherifi-Hertel, H. Bulou, R. Hertel, G. Taupier, K. D. Dorkenoo, C. Andreas, J. Guyonnet, I. Gaponenko, K. Gallo, and P. Paruch, Non-ising and chiral ferroelectric domain walls revealed by nonlinear optical microscopy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15768 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1038/n...

  21. [31]

    Cherifi-Hertel, C

    S. Cherifi-Hertel, C. V oulot, U. Acevedo-Salas, Y . Zhang, O. Crégut, K. Dodzi Dorkenoo, and R. Hertel. Shedding light on non-Ising polar domain walls: Insight from second harmonic generation microscopy and polarimetry analysis. J. Appl. Phys. 129, 081101 (2021); https://doi....

  22. [32]

    Acevedo-Salas, B

    U. Acevedo-Salas, B. Croes, Y. Zhang, O. Cregut, K. D. Dorkenoo, B. Kirbus, E. Singh, H. Beccard, M. Lukas M. Eng, R. Hertel, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, S. Cherifi-Hertel. Impact of 3D 30 curvature on the polarization orientation in non-Ising domain walls. Nano Letters 2...

  23. [33]

    A. K. Tagantsev, Piezoelectricity and flexoelectricity in crystalline dielectrics, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5883 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5883

  24. [34]

    Zubko, G

    P. Zubko, G. Catalan, and A. K. Tagantsev, Flexoelectric effect in solids, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 43, 387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121634

  25. [35]

    Catalan, L

    G. Catalan, L. J Sinnamon, J. M Gregg, The effect of flexoelectricity on the dielectric properties of inhomogeneously strained ferroelectric thin films, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 2253 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/13/006

  26. [36]

    Catalan, B

    G. Catalan, B. Noheda, J. McAneney, L. J. Sinnamon, J. M. Gregg, Strain gradients in epitaxial ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 72, 020102(R) (2005); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.020102

  27. [37]

    M. S. Majdoub, P. Sharma, and T. Cagin, Enhanced size-dependent piezoelectricity and elasticity in nanostructures due to the flexoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. B 77, 125424 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125424

  28. [38]

    Abdollahi, F

    A. Abdollahi, F. Vásquez-Sancho, and G. Catalan. Piezoelectric mimicry of flexoelectricity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 205502 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.205502

  29. [39]

    H. Lu, C-W. Bark, D. Esque De Los Ojos, J. Alcala, C.-B. Eom, G. Catalan, and A. Gruverman. Mechanical writing of ferroelectric polarization. Science 336 (6077), 59 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218693

  30. [40]

    Stefani, E

    C. Stefani, E. Langenberg, K. Cordero-Edwards, D. G. Schlom, G. Catalan, and N. Domingo. Mechanical reading of ferroelectric polarization. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 074103 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0059930

  31. [41]

    P. V. Yudin, A. K. Tagantsev, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska and N. Setter. Bichiral structure of ferroelectric domain walls driven by flexoelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134102 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134102

  32. [42]

    E. A. Eliseev, P. V. Yudin, S. V. Kalinin, N. Setter, A. K. Tagantsev and A. N. Morozovska. Structural phase transitions and electronic phenomena at 180-degree domain walls in rhombohedral BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 87, 054111 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.054111

  33. [43]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, M. D. Glinchuk, L.-Q. Chen, V. Gopalan. Interfacial polarization and pyroelectricity in antiferrodistortive structures induced by a flexoelectric effect and rotostriction. Phys. Rev. B. 85, 094107 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.094107

  34. [44]

    Gopalan and D

    V. Gopalan and D. B. Litvin, Rotation-reversal symmetries in crystals and handed structures. Nature Materials 10, 376 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2987

  35. [45]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, S. V. Kalinin, Long-Qing Chen and Venkatraman Gopalan. Surface polar states and pyroelectricity in ferroelastics induced by flexo-roto field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 142902 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3701152

  36. [46]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, Y. Gu, A.Y. Borisevich, L.-Q. Chen and V. Gopalan, and S.V. Kalinin. Conductivity of twin walls - surface junctions in ferroelastics: interplay of deformation potential, 31 octahedral rotations, improper ferroelectricity and flexoelectric coupl...

  37. [47]

    Bousquet, M

    E. Bousquet, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger, P. Hermet, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone and P. Ghosez, Improper ferroelectricity in perovskite oxide artificial superlattices. Nature, 452, 732 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06817

  38. [48]

    C. J. Fennie and K. M. Rabe. Ferroelectric transition in YMnO3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 72, 100103(R) (2005); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.100103

  39. [49]

    N. A. Benedek and C. J. Fennie. Hybrid Improper Ferroelectricity: A Mechanism for Controllable Polarization-Magnetization Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107204 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.107204

  40. [50]

    Goncalves-Ferreira, S

    L. Goncalves-Ferreira, S. A. T. Redfern, E. Artacho, and E. K. H. Salje. Ferrielectric Twin Walls in CaTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 097602 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.097602

  41. [51]

    Van Aert, S

    S. Van Aert, S. Turner, R. Delville, D. Schryvers, G. Van Tendeloo, E. K. H. Salje. Direct observation of ferrielectricity at ferroelastic domain boundaries in CaTiO3 by electron microscopy. Adv. Mater. 24, 523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103717

  42. [52]

    A. Y. Borisevich, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, C.-J. Cheng, J.-Y. Lin, Y. H. Chu, D. Kan, I. Takeuchi, V. Nagarajan, S.V. Kalinin. Atomic-scale evolution of modulated phases at the ferroelectric– antiferroelectric morphotropic phase boundary controlled by flexoelectric int...

  43. [53]

    E. A. Eliseev, S. V. Kalinin, Y. Gu, M. D. Glinchuk, V. Khist, A. Borisevich, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, and A. N. Morozovska. Universal emergence of spatially-modulated structures induced by flexo- antiferrodistortive coupling in multiferroics. Phys. Rev. B 88, 224105 (2013); ht...

  44. [54]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, M. D. Glinchuk, and R. Blinc. Spontaneous flexoelectric/flexomagnetic effect in nanoferroics. Phys. Rev. B. 79, 165433 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165433

  45. [55]

    I. S. Vorotiahin, E. A. Eliseev, Q. Li, S. V. Kalinin, Y. A. Genenko and A. N. Morozovska. Tuning the Polar States of Ferroelectric Films via Surface Charges and Flexoelectricity. Acta Materialia 137, 85 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.033

  46. [56]

    E. A. Eliseev, I. S. Vorotiahin, Y. M. Fomichov, M. D. Glinchuk, S. V. Kalinin, Y. A. Genenko, and A. N. Morozovska. Defect driven flexo-chemical coupling in thin ferroelectric films. Phys. Rev. B 97, 024102 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.024102

  47. [57]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3

  48. [58]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91 32

  49. [59]

    K. C. Erb, and J. Hlinka. Vector, bidirector, and Bloch skyrmion phases induced by structural crystallographic symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024110 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024110

  50. [60]

    H. J. Zhao, P. Chen, S. Prosandeev, S. Artyukhin, and L. Bellaiche. Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya-like interaction in ferroelectrics and antiferroelectrics, Nat. Mater. 20, 341 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00821-3

  51. [61]

    Flexoelectricity in Solids: From Theory to Applications

    "Flexoelectricity in Solids: From Theory to Applications". Ed. by A. K. Tagantsev and P. V. Yudin, World Scientific (2016); ISBN 9789814719315

  52. [62]

    B. Wang, Y. Gu, S. Zhang, L.-Q. Chen. Flexoelectricity in solids: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Progress in Materials Science, 106, 100570 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.05.003

  53. [63]

    B. A. Strukov and A. P. Levanyuk, Ferroelectric Phenomena in Crystals: Physical Foundations (Springer, Berlin 1998); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60293-1

  54. [64]

    A. N. Morozovska, R. Hertel, S. Cherifi-Hertel, V. Yu. Reshetnyak, E. A. Eliseev, and D. R. Evans. Chiral Polarization Textures Induced by the Flexoelectric Effect in Ferroelectric Nanocylinders. Phys. Rev. B 104, 054118 (2021); https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.054118

  55. [65]

    K. Ran, Y. Liu, Y. Guang, D.M. Burn, G. van der Laan, T. Hesjedal, H. Du, G. Yu, and S. Zhang. Creation of a chiral bobber lattice in helimagnet-multilayer heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 017204 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.017204

  56. [66]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, S. V. Kalinin, and R. Hertel. Flexo-Sensitive Polarization Vortices in Thin Ferroelectric Films. Phys. Rev. B 104, 085420 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.085420

  57. [67]

    Hertel and C.M

    R. Hertel and C.M. Schneider, Exchange Explosions: Magnetization Dynamics during Vortex- Antivortex Annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177202 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.177202

  58. [68]

    Everschor-Sitte, J

    K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui. Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions— Overview of recent progress in an active research field. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048972

  59. [69]

    D. D. Sheka, A perspective on curvilinear magnetism, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 230502 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048891

  60. [70]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, R. Hertel, Y. M. Fomichov, V. Tulaidan, V. Yu. Reshetnyak, and D. R. Evans. Electric Field Control of Three-Dimensional Vortex States in Core-Shell Ferroelectric Nanoparticles. Acta Mater. 200, 256 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.003

  61. [71]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, R. Hertel, H. V. Shevliakova, Y. M. Fomichov, V. Yu. Reshetnyak, and D. R. Evans. Flexo-Elastic Control Factors of Domain Morphology in Core-Shell Ferroelectric Nanoparticles: Soft and Rigid Shells. Acta Mater. 212, 116889 (2021); https://doi.o...

  62. [72]

    E. A. Eliseev, Y. M. Fomichov, S. V. Kalinin, Y. M. Vysochanskii, P. Maksymovich and A. N. Morozovska. Labyrinthine domains in ferroelectric nanoparticles: Manifestation of a gradient-induced morphological phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 98, 054101 (2018); https://doi.org/10.11...

  63. [73]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, Salia Cherifi-Hertel, D. R. Evans, and R. Hertel. Electric field control of labyrinth domain structures in core-shell ferroelectric nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 106, 144104 (2022); https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.144104

  64. [74]

    E. A. Eliseev, S. V. Kalinin, A. N. Morozovska. Ferro-ionic States and Domains Morphology in HfxZr1-xO2 Nanoparticles, 137 (3), 034103 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243067

  65. [75]

    Fujimoto, Y

    K. Fujimoto, Y. Sato, Y. Fuchikami, R. Teranishi, and K. Kaneko. Orthorhombic‐like atomic arrangement in hafnium‐oxide‐based nanoparticles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 105, 2823 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.18242

  66. [76]

    Laganovska, V

    K. Laganovska, V. Vitola, E. Einbergs, I. Bite, A. Zolotarjovs, M. Leimane, G. Tunens, and K. Smits. Impact of Europium and Niobium Doping on Hafnium Oxide (HfO2): Comparative Analysis of Sol– Gel and Combustion Synthesis Methods. Ceramics, 7, 15 (2024); https://doi.org/10.339...

  67. [77]

    E. A. Eliseev, Y. O. Zagorodniy, V. N. Pavlikov, O. V. Leshchenko, H. V. Shevilakova, M. V. Karpec, A. D. Yaremkevych, O. M. Fesenko, S. V. Kalinin, and A. N. Morozovska. Phase diagrams and polarization reversal in nanosized HfxZr1-xO2-y, AIP Advances 14, 055224 (2024); https:...

  68. [78]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, O. A. Kovalenko, and D. R. Evans. The Influence of Chemical Strains on the Electrocaloric Response, Polarization Morphology, Tetragonality and Negative Capacitance Effect of Ferroelectric Core-Shell Nanorods and Nanowires. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, ...

  69. [79]

    A. N. Morozovska, S. V. Kalinin, E. A. Eliseev, S. Kopyl, Y. M. Vysochanskii, and D. R. Evans. Ferri-ionic Coupling in CuInP2S6 Nanoflakes: Polarization States and Controllable Negative Capacitance. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 034059 (2024); https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevAp...

  70. [80]

    A. N. Morozovska and M. D. Glinchuk. Flexo-chemo effect in nanoferroics as a source of critical size disappearance at size-induced phase transitions. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 094109 (2016); http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942859

  71. [81]

    A. N. Morozovska, S. V. Kalinin, M. E. Yelisieiev, J. Yang, M. Ahmadi, E. A. Eliseev, and D. R. Evans. Dynamic control of ferroionic states in ferroelectric nanoparticles. Acta Materialia 237, 118138 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118138

  72. [82]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, I. V. Fesych, Y. O. Zagorodniy, O. S. Pylypchuk, E. V. Leonenko, M. V. Rallev, A. D. Yaremkevych, L. Demchenko, S. V. Kalinin, and O. M. Fesenko. Reentrant polar phase induced by the ferro-ionic coupling in Bi1-xSmxFeO3 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev...

  73. [83]

    Stepkova, P

    V. Stepkova, P. Marton, and J. Hlinka. Ising lines: Natural topological defects within ferroelectric Bloch walls. Phys. Rev. B 92, 094106 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.094106 34

  74. [84]

    Viehland, and J.-F

    D. Viehland, and J.-F. Li. Kinetics of polarization reversal in 0.7Pb(Mg1/3 Nb 2/3) O 3–0.3 PbTiO3: Heterogeneous nucleation in the vicinity of quenched random fields. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 2995 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1383978

  75. [85]

    Wartelle, B

    A. Wartelle, B. Trapp, M. Staňo, C. Thirion, S. Bochmann, J. Bachmann, M. Foerster, L. Aballe, T. O. Menteş, A. Locatelli, A. Sala, L. Cagnon, J.-C. Toussaint, and O. Fruchart, Bloch-point-mediated topological transformations of magnetic domain walls in cylindrical nanowires, ...

  76. [88]

    Kim, Y.-S

    S.-K. Kim, Y.-S. Choi, K.-S. Lee, K. Y. Guslienko, and D.-E. Jeong, Electric-current-driven vortex- core reversal in soft magnetic nanodots, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 082506 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2773748

  77. [89]

    Hertel, Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires, J

    R. Hertel, Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 28, 483002 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/483002

  78. [90]

    V. I. Yukalov and E. P. Yukalova. Ultrafast polarization switching in ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033136 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033136

  79. [91]

    Y. Miao, X. Zhou, Z. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Yuan, Y. Jing, H. Luo, D. Zhang, and J. Sun. Electrically‐ Reconfigurable Extremely‐High Density Physical Unclonable Cryptographic Keys Based on Aurivillius Ferroelectrics. Adv. Func. Mater. 34, 2314883 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm...

  80. [92]

    S. V. Kalinin, J. J. Steffes, Y. Liu, B. D. Huey, and M. Ziatdinov. Disentangling ferroelectric domain wall geometries and pathways in dynamic piezoresponse force microscopy via unsupervised machine learning. Nanotechnology 33, 055707 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac2f5b

  81. [93]

    Shafer, P

    P. Shafer, P. García-Fernández, P. Aguado-Puente, A. R. Damodaran, A. K. Yadav, C.T. Nelson, S. L. Hsu, J. C. Wojdeł, J. Íñiguez, L. W. Martin, and E. Arenholz, Emergent chirality in the electric polarization texture of titanate superlattices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115...

  82. [94]

    S. W. Lovesey, G. van der Laan, Resonant x-ray diffraction from chiral electric-polarization structures. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155410 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155410

  83. [95]

    Fusil, J.Y

    S. Fusil, J.Y. Chauleau, X. Li, J. Fischer, P. Dufour, C. Léveillé, C. Carrétéro, N. Jaouen, M. Viret A. Gloter, V. Garcia. Polar Chirality in BiFeO3 Emerging from A Peculiar Domain Wall Sequence. Adv. Electronic Materials, 8, 2101155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202101155

  84. [96]

    S, Salahuddin and S. Datta. Use of negative capacitance to provide voltage amplification for low power nanoscale devices. Nano letters 8, 405 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl071804g 35

  85. [97]

    A. I. Khan, D. Bhowmik, P. Yu, S. J. Kim, X. Pan, R. Ramesh, and S. Salahuddin. Experimental evidence of ferroelectric negative capacitance in nanoscale heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113501 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3634072

  86. [98]

    A. I. Khan, K. Chatterjee, B. Wang, S. Drapcho, L. You, C. Serrao, S. R. Bakaul, R. Ramesh, and S. Salahuddin. Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor. Nat. Mater. 14, 182 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4148

  87. [99]

    C. Wang, L. You, D. Cobden and J. Wang. Towards two-dimensional van der Waals ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater. 22, 542–552 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01422-y

  88. [100]

    X. Wang, P. Yu, Z. Lei, C. Zhu, X. Cao, F. Liu, L. You, Q. Zeng, Y. Deng, C. Zhu, and J. Zhou, Van der Waals negative capacitance transistors. Nat Commun., 10, 3037 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10738-4

  89. [101]

    Zubko, J

    P. Zubko, J. C. Wojdeł, M. Hadjimichael, S. Fernandez-Pena, A. Sené, I. Luk’yanchuk, J.-M. Triscone, and J. Íñiguez. Negative capacitance in multidomain ferroelectric superlattices. Nature 534, 524 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17659

  90. [102]

    Hoffmann, M

    M. Hoffmann, M. Pešic, S. Slesazeck, U. Schroeder, and T. Mikolajick, On the stabilization of ferroelectric negative capacitance in nanoscale devices. Nanoscale 10, 10891 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR02752H

  91. [103]

    A. K. Yadav, K. X. Nguyen, Z. Hong, P. García-Fernández, P. Aguado-Puente, C. T. Nelson, S. Das, B. Prasad, D. Kwon, S. Cheema, A. I. Khan, C. Hu, Jorge Íñiguez, J. Junquera, L.-Q. Chen, D. A. Muller, R. Ramesh, S. Salahuddin. Spatially resolved steady-state negative capacitan...

  92. [104]

    S. M. Neumayer, L. Tao, A. O'Hara, M.A. Susner, M. A. McGuire, P. Maksymovych, S. T. Pantelides, and N. Balke. The concept of negative capacitance in ionically conductive van der Waals ferroelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2001726 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001726

  93. [105]

    E. A. Eliseev, M. E. Yelisieiev, S. V. Kalinin, and A. N. Morozovska. Observability of negative capacitance of a ferroelectric film: Theoretical predictions. Phys. Rev. B 105, 174110 (2022); https://doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.174110

  94. [106]

    Luk’yanchuk, A

    I. Luk’yanchuk, A. Razumnaya, A. Sene, Y . Tikhonov, and V . M. Vinokur. The ferroelectric field- effect transistor with negative capacitance. npj Computational Materials 8, 52 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00738-2

  95. [107]

    I. B. Misirlioglu, M. K. Yapici, K. Sendur, and M. B. Okatan. Weak Dependence of Voltage Amplification in a Semiconductor Channel on Strain State and Thickness of a Multidomain Ferroelectric in a Bilayer Gate. ACS Appl. Elect. Mater. 5, 6832 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1021/acs...

  96. [108]

    D. A. Freedman, D. Roundy, and T. A. Arias. Elastic effects of vacancies in strontium titanate: Short- and long-range strain fields, elastic dipole tensors, and chemical strain. Phys. Rev. B 80, 064108 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.064108

  97. [109]

    Y . Kim, A. S. Disa, T. E. Babakol, and J. D. Brock. Strain screening by mobile oxygen vacancies in SrTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 251901 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3455157 36

  98. [110]

    K. J. Choi, M. Biegalski,Y. L. Li, A. Sharan, J. Schubert, R. Uecker, P. Reiche, Y. B. Chen, X. Q. Pan, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, D. G. Schlom, and C. B. Eom, Enhancement of Ferroelectricity in Strained BaTiO3 Thin Films. Science 306, 1005 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103218

  99. [111]

    Ederer and N

    C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, Effect of epitaxial strain on the spontaneous polarization of thin film ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257601, (2005); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257601

  100. [112]

    M. D. Glinchuk, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev. Ferroelectric thin films phase diagrams with self- polarized phase and electret state. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 114102 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2198940

  101. [113]

    K. P. Kelley , A. N. Morozovska , E. A. Eliseev , V. Sharma, D. E. Yilmaz, A. C. T. van Duin, P. Ganesh, A. Borisevich, S. Jesse, P. Maksymovych, N. Balke, S. V. Kalinin, R. K. Vasudevan. Oxygen vacancy injection as a pathway to enhancing electromechanical responses in ferroel...

  102. [114]

    S. A. Basun, G. Cook, V. Y. Reshetnyak, A. V. Glushchenko, and D. R. Evans, Dipole moment and spontaneous polarization of ferroelectric nanoparticles in a nonpolar fluid suspension. Phys. Rev. B 84, 024105 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.024105 (Editor’s Selection)

  103. [115]

    D. R. Evans, S. A. Basun, G. Cook, I. P. Pinkevych, and V. Yu. Reshetnyak. Electric field interactions and aggregation dynamics of ferroelectric nanoparticles in isotropic fluid suspensions. Phys. Rev. B, 84, 174111 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174111

  104. [116]

    Yu. A. Barnakov, I. U. Idehenre, S. A. Basun, T. A. Tyson, and D. R. Evans. Uncovering the Mystery of Ferroelectricity in Zero Dimensional Nanoparticles. Royal Society of Chemistry, Nanoscale Adv. 1, 664 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00131F

  105. [117]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Liu, S. Ghose, B. Ravel, I. U. Idehenre, Y. A. Barnakov, S. A. Basun, D. R. Evans, and T. A. Tyson. Structural Origin of Recovered Ferroelectricity in BaTiO 3 Nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 108, 064106 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064106

  106. [118]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, S. V. Kalinin, and D. R. Evans. Strain -Induced Polarization Enhancement in BaTiO 3 Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B. 109, 014104 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014104

  107. [119]

    Bourgeois, B

    S. Bourgeois, B. Domenichini and J. Jupille, Excess Electrons at Oxide Surfaces, Chapter 4 in: Defects at Oxide Surfaces, ed.: J. Jupille and G. Thornton, Springer Series in Surface Sciences 58, (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14367-5_4

  108. [120]

    Maisonneuve, V

    V. Maisonneuve, V. B. Cajipe, A. Simon, R. Von Der Muhll, and J. Ravez. Ferrielectric ordering in lamellar CuInP2S6. Phys. Rev. B 56, 10860 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10860

  109. [121]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, Y. M. Vysochanskii, S. V. Kalinin, and M. V. Strikha. Size Effect of Negative Capacitance State and Subthreshold Swing in Van der Waals Ferrielectric Field-Effect Transistors, Advanced Electronic Materials 11, 2400495 (2025); https://doi.org/10...

  110. [122]

    K. Dey, B. Das, P. K. Hazra, T. Kundu, S. Naskar, S. Das, S. Maity, P. Maji, B. Karmakar, R. Paramanik, S. Datta. Negative Capacitance for Stabilizing Logic State in Tunnel Field-Effect Transistor, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7 (23), 26405 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c06311 37

  111. [123]

    M. Chi, A. Li, X. Zhang, Z. Li, M. Jia, J. Wang, Z. L. Wang, J. Zhai. Strain tuning on Van der Waals negative capacitance transistors, Nano Energy 126, 109640 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109640

  112. [124]

    G. B. Stephenson and M. J. Highland, Equilibrium and stability of polarization in ultrathin ferroelectric films with ionic surface compensation. Phys. Rev. B 84, 064107 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.064107

  113. [125]

    K. Y . Foo, and B. H. Hameed, Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems, Chem. Eng. J. 156, 2 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013

  114. [126]

    S. V . Kalinin, E. A. Eliseev, and A. N. Morozovska. Adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by ferroelectric nanoparticles. Physical Review Applied 23, 014081 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.014081

  115. [127]

    E. S. Beh, S. A. Basun, X. Feng, I. U. Idehenre, D. R. Evans, and M. W. Kanan. Molecular catalysis at polarized interfaces created by ferroelectric BaTiO3. Chemical Science 8, 2790 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sc05032h

  116. [128]

    flexo-mismatch

    Note that if the system reaction to the mismatch strain is the appearance of homogeneous strains (such as in thin films without dislocations, domain structure, and top stress-free surface), “flexo-mismatch” strains do not emerge, because the flexo-coupling requires a strain gr...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.