Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Haloscope Searching for Dark Photons at Q-band with a Novel Coupling Tuning Structure

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 33.141 GHz haloscope cavity places the tightest direct limit on dark-photon kinetic mixing in a 16.5 neV window near 137.06 µeV.

desk verdict First Q-band haloscope search with a defensible new constraint; two correctness fixes (cavity geometry, systematic-error formula) are needed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14944 v1 pith:W7YH445D submitted 2025-04-21 astro-ph.CO hep-ex

Yue Yin , Runqi Kang , Man Jiao , Xing Rong This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COhep-ex PACS 95.35.+d
keywords darkphotonmatterhaloscopeQ-bandmicrowavecavitykineticmixingTM010modesearchhigh-frequencylimits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first Q-band haloscope search for dark-photon dark matter, using a cylindrical cavity resonant at 33.141 GHz. The authors claim a 90% confidence upper limit $\chi<2.5\times10^{-12}$ on the kinetic mixing between dark and ordinary photons over 33.139–33.143 GHz, corresponding to dark-photon masses 137.05–137.07 µeV; this would be the strongest constraint in that mass window and nearly three orders of magnitude tighter than previous astronomical bounds. The enabling step is a coupling-tuning structure placed outside the cavity, so the coupling can be adjusted without degrading the cavity's quality factor. If correct, the result shows that haloscope searches can be pushed above 30 GHz, where cavity mode volume shrinks rapidly with frequency, and it opens a path toward axion and high-frequency gravitational-wave searches.

What carries the argument

The central object is a resonant haloscope cavity whose dark-photon conversion power is $P_s(\nu)=2\pi\nu_{A'}\rho_{A'}\chi^2 V C\,\frac{Q_L Q_a}{Q_L+Q_a}\frac{\beta}{1+\beta}\mathcal{L}(\nu,\nu_c,Q_L)$, with volume $V=7.3\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{L}$, TM010 form factor $C=0.23$, loaded quality factor $Q_L=2520$, and Lorentzian line shape $\mathcal{L}$. The load-bearing mechanical feature is a bow-shaped waveguide terminated by a movable metallic bulk outside the cavity: moving the bulk shifts the waveguide standing-wave nodes and antinodes, tuning the coupling $\beta$ to near-critical value $\beta=1.0243$ without inserting lossy material into the cavity. The analysis chain applies an SG filter to remove the baseline, rescales the excess to a $\chi=1$ signal, convolves with the dark-photon line shape to recover signal-to-noise lost to fine binning, averages all spectra, and converts the final excess into a 90% upper limit through Eq. (6).

What would settle it

Measure the physical inner diameter of the fabricated cavity and its TM010 resonance: a cylinder of diameter 3.56 mm and length 20.00 mm should resonate near 64.5 GHz, not 33.141 GHz, while the quoted volume implies a diameter near 6.8 mm; a direct dimensional check and a re-derivation of $V C$ from the measured geometry would confirm or correct the $\chi<2.5\times10^{-12}$ bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a small cylindrical cavity, operated at room temperature in the TM010 mode, can convert a dark-photon halo into a detectable microwave excess at 33.141 GHz. After 12 hours of data-taking, no normalized power excess above five standard deviations was observed. Fitting the noise and systematics through a Bayesian 90% interval gives $\chi<2.1\times10^{-12}$ at the central frequency and $\chi<2.5\times10^{-12}$ across the scanned band under a random-polarization assumption; a linear-polarization scenario modifies the bound by a factor $(0.74,3.26)$ depending on the unknown polarization direction. This is presented as the first Q-band haloscope result and the most stringent dark-photon constraint in the 137 µeV mass region, surpassing the previous dark-photon constraints by nearly three orders of magnitude.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result is normalized by the assumed product of cavity volume and form factor ($V C$); if the actual fabricated cavity does not have $V=7.3\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{L}$ and $C=0.23$ in its TM010 mode, the quoted $\chi$ limits shift with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claimed limit stands, the 137.05–137.07 µeV dark-photon mass window now has its best direct laboratory constraint, roughly 1000 times stronger than the previous astronomical bound.
  • The external coupling-tuning design removes a major obstacle for high-frequency haloscopes, since small cavities cannot tolerate internal tuning elements, and the same architecture can be reused at still higher bands.
  • Cryogenic operation and lower-noise amplification should improve the constraint by more than an order of magnitude, as the paper states, without redesigning the cavity.
  • The same readout and analysis pipeline can be redirected to axions, axion-like particles, and high-frequency gravitational waves, because the signal chain only requires a resonant microwave mode with nonzero form factor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A dimensional check suggests a transparent calibration audit: a 3.56 mm diameter, 20 mm long cylinder has no TM010 resonance at 33.141 GHz (its TM010 frequency is near 64.5 GHz), whereas the quoted volume $V=7.3\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{L}$ implies a diameter near 6.8 mm; remeasuring the fabricated cavity would settle which value is correct.
  • Because the signal power scales linearly with volume while noise grows only as the square root of integration time, phase-coherently stacking several small Q-band cavities could recover the mode volume lost at high frequency, provided their resonances can be matched within a dark-photon linewidth.
  • The 70-bin-per-line analysis strategy could serve as a built-in signal veto: a true dark-photon signal must reproduce the Lorentzian line shape and the expected frequency dependence of $P_{DP}(\nu)$, so future runs can reject narrow radio-frequency interference by demanding both features simultaneously.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a room-temperature haloscope search for dark photon dark matter at 33.141 GHz, corresponding to a dark photon mass of about 137.06 μeV. A small cylindrical copper cavity is coupled to a HEMT readout chain through a bow-shaped waveguide whose coupling is tuned by a movable metallic bulk placed outside the cavity. The authors measure the cavity parameters (νc, QL, β) via S11 reflection fits, collect 12 hours of power spectra, subtract the baseline with a Savitzky-Golay filter, rescale by the expected dark-photon signal, convolve with the dark-photon line shape, and derive a 90% upper limit on the kinetic mixing parameter χ. Their main result is χ < 2.5×10^-12 over 33.139–33.143 GHz, which they state is the first Q-band haloscope constraint and about three orders of magnitude stronger than the existing DPDM bound.

Significance. If the result is valid, it demonstrates the first cavity-based haloscope search above 30 GHz and provides the most stringent direct laboratory constraint on dark-photon dark matter in the 137 μeV mass window. The instrumental concept—coupling tuning via an external waveguide structure that does not touch the cavity interior—is a useful technical contribution for high-frequency haloscopes. The analysis methodology is standard and the statistical treatment is clearly described. However, the central calibration is undermined by an internal inconsistency in the stated cavity geometry and by a systematic-error formula that suppresses calibration uncertainties at the null, so the current manuscript requires correction before the quoted limit can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2), Table I] The stated cavity geometry is internally inconsistent. The text says the cylindrical cavity has diameter 3.56 mm and length 20.00 mm; this gives a volume of π(0.178 cm)^2(2.00 cm) = 1.99×10^-4 L, not the V = 7.3×10^-4 L listed in Table I. Moreover, the TM010 resonance of a right circular cylinder of diameter D is f ≈ c x01/(π D) with x01 = 2.4048, yielding f ≈ 64.5 GHz for D = 3.56 mm, not the measured 33.141 GHz. To resonate at 33.141 GHz in TM010 the diameter would need to be about 6.93 mm, which is much closer to the Table I volume. Since the volume V enters Eq. (2) linearly and the χ limit scales as (V C)^-1/2, the volume discrepancy changes the quoted limit by a factor of sqrt(7.3/1.99) ≈ 1.9. Please clarify which statement is correct: if the diameter is a typo, provide the correct diameter and confirm that the form factor C = 0.23 was computed for the actual geometry; if the volume is wrong, recompute the limit and the comparison to DPDM.
  2. [Section 3, systematic-error discussion and Fig. 3(d)] The combined systematic error formula σ'_c = sqrt(σ_c^2 + Δ_c^2(σ_QL^2 + σ_β^2 + σ_νc^2 + σ_V^2)) makes all systematic contributions vanish exactly when the measured excess Δ_c is zero, which is the null-result regime where the limit is set. Calibration uncertainties in QL, β, νc, and V affect the conversion from power excess to χ² independently of the observed value of Δ_c; they should be propagated as nuisance parameters in the likelihood or otherwise included without multiplication by Δ_c. As written, the red ribbon in Fig. 3(d) underestimates the systematic uncertainty near the null, and the resulting limit may be artificially tight.
  3. [Section 3, baseline subtraction] The Savitzky-Golay filter is applied to each averaged power spectrum, but the filter window length and polynomial order are not reported. The authors state that a dark-photon signal spans about 70 frequency bins with B = 477 Hz, so the signal linewidth is roughly 33 kHz. If the SG filter bandwidth is comparable to this linewidth, a real signal could be partially removed, biasing the limit. Please specify the SG filter parameters and demonstrate (e.g., with an injected Lorentzian or an analytic transfer function) that a 33 kHz line is recovered with negligible attenuation after the convolution step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, opening paragraph] The sentence 'the cavity was cylindrical with diameter 3.56 mm' contains a duplicated definite article; also, 'frequency-elength' appears to be a typo for 'frequency-wavelength' in the introduction.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The sentence defining the variables says 'V is the volume and the form factor of the cavity' but should be 'C is the form factor'; the definition of C that follows is otherwise clear.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains the garbled token 'brubaker2017firsbulk', apparently a leftover citation key; it should be replaced with the proper reference to the movable metallic bulk or removed.
  4. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract claims 'most stringent constraints' but the quantitative comparison is made only to DPDM; please state explicitly whether any other existing laboratory limit covers this mass range, and if not, say so.
  5. [Section 3, Eq. (7)] The posterior in Eq. (7) uses a uniform prior on χ², which yields a Bayesian credible interval, yet the text calls it a 'confidence level'; this is conventional in the field, but the terminology should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dark-photon limit is derived from measured noise and calibrated cavity parameters, not from a fitted chi; the only self-citation concerns readout hardware and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central quantity is the exclusion limit on the kinetic mixing chi. The derivation path is: measure S11 to obtain QL, beta, and nu_c; measure HEMT gains and system noise; record 12 hours of spectra; subtract a Savitzky-Golay baseline; rescale the excess by the expected dark-photon power PDP(chi=1) from Eq. (2); convolve with the expected line shape; average all subsets; and integrate Eq. (6)/(7) to obtain chi_90%. The target chi appears only as the unknown in Eq. (6), not as a fitted input; Eq. (5) merely normalizes the measured excess by the chi=1 prediction, and the resulting limit is the standard radiometer ratio of noise to PDP(chi=1). No parameter is fitted to the dark-photon signal channel to produce the limit. The only self-citations in the paper are Ref. [36] and [37], used to support the statement that the DAQ can perform FFT and save spectra with 100% duty cycle; this is a technical hardware reference and does not affect the physics conclusion, so it is not load-bearing. The internal geometry inconsistency noted in the text (stated diameter 3.56 mm versus volume 7.3e-4 L versus the TM010 resonance at 33.141 GHz) is a calibration/correctness concern about V and the form factor entering Eq. (2), but it is not circular: V and C are external inputs, not outputs of the claimed chi limit. Under the specified tests, no self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation chain, or renaming step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central limit rests on standard halo assumptions for dark matter density and coherence, plus calibration parameters fitted from the S11 measurement. The most fragile input is the volume-times-form-factor product used to normalize the expected signal, because the paper's stated cavity dimensions are internally inconsistent. No new particles, mediators, or entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Loaded quality factor Q_L = 2520 +/- 5
    Fitted to the S11 reflection data using Eq. (3); enters the signal power and the limit.
  • Coupling strength beta = 1.0243 +/- 0.0007
    Fitted to S11; sets the coupling factor beta/(1+beta) in Eq. (2).
  • Resonant frequency nu_c = 33.141 GHz
    Fitted to S11; fixes the search frequency and line-shape center.
  • Cavity volume V = 7.3e-4 L with relative uncertainty 6.4e-2
    Used to normalize the expected signal; inconsistent with the stated cavity diameter, so its true value is uncertain.
  • Form factor C = 0.23
    TM010 mode form factor used in Eq. (2); no independent measurement is reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local dark matter density rho_A' = 0.45 GeV/cm^3.
    The signal power in Eq. (2) scales linearly with this density; the limit assumes dark photons constitute all local dark matter.
  • domain assumption Dark photon field quality factor Q_a = 10^6, corresponding to a 33.141 kHz linewidth.
    The matched-filter convolution and binning assume this coherence time; it is the standard halo assumption.
  • domain assumption The kinetic-mixing Lagrangian of Eq. (1) describes the conversion process.
    The haloscope signal formula is derived from this beyond-Standard-Model framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The Savitzky-Golay filter isolates the baseline without absorbing a real dark-photon line.
    No signal injection or synthetic-signal study is reported to validate this; if the filter removes part of a real line, the limit is biased.
  • standard math The noise after averaging is Gaussian, justifying Eq. (7) for the 90 percent limit.
    The posterior probability in Eq. (7) assumes a normal distribution of the averaged power excess.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Haloscope Searching for Dark Photons at Q-band with a Novel Coupling Tuning Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7YH445D

@misc{pith2026250414944,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Haloscope Searching for Dark Photons at Q-band with a Novel Coupling Tuning Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7YH445D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14944}
}
abstract

Laboratory searching for dark matter is crucial for understanding several fundamental conundrums in physics and cosmology. Most cavity-based haloscope searches focus on the frequency range below 10 GHz, while the parameter space with higher frequency remains rarely explored, due to the challenges lying in the fabrication of microwave cavities. Here we report the first Q-band haloscope searching for dark photons with a 33.141 GHz cavity. A novel coupling tuning structure separated from the cavity was designed so as not to degrade the quality factor of the cavity. We have established the most stringent constraints $\chi<2.5\times10^{-12}$ at a confidence level of 90$\%$ in the frequency range from 33.139 GHz to 33.143 GHz, corresponding to the mass of dark photons ranging from 137.05 $\mu$eV to 137.07 $\mu$eV. The results surpass the previous astronomical constraints by nearly three orders of magnitude. This work has demonstrated the feasibility of dark matter haloscopes at Q band. In the future, the constraints can be further improved by more than one order of magnitude through low-temperature experiments, and the setup can be extended to search for axions, axion-like particles, and high-frequency gravitational waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14944 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Calibration results. (a) Reflection coefficients of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experiment results. (a) The noise power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Constraints on the kinetic mixing between dark pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forecast Constraints on Bouncing Cosmology from High Frequency Gravitational Waves Using Superconducting LC Circuits and Resonant Cavities

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper forecasts that resonant-cavity and superconducting-circuit gravitational wave detectors could constrain the bounce energy scale of a generic bouncing cosmology far more tightly than astrophysical observatori...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Clowe, A

    D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez, and M. Markevitch, Weak- Lensing Mass Reconstruction of the Interacting Cluster 1E 0657-558: Direct Evidence for the Existence of Dark 5 Matter. Astrophysical Journal - ASTROPHYS J 604 , 596-603 , 2004

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Tucker, et al

    W. Tucker, et al. , 1E 0657–56: A Contender for the Hottest Known Cluster of Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 496 , L5 , 2009

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Kuster, G

    M. Kuster, G. Raffelt, and B. Beltr´ an, Axions: Theory, cosmology, and experimental searches . Springer Science & Business Media

    work page

  4. [4]

    Zwicky, et al

    F. Zwicky, et al. , The redshift of extragalactic nebulae. Helv. Phys. Acta 6 (110) , 138 , 1933

    work page 1933

  5. [5]

    Chang, et al

    J. Chang, et al. , An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300–800 GeV. Nature 456 , 362-5 , 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Cholis, et al

    I. Cholis, et al. , High energy positrons from annihilat- ing dark matter. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 80 (12) , 123511 , 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Abi, et al., Measurement of the Positive Muon Anoma- lous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm

    B. Abi, et al., Measurement of the Positive Muon Anoma- lous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm. Physical Review Letters 126 , 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Cazzaniga, et al., Probing the explanation of the muon (g-2) anomaly and thermal light dark matter with the semi-visible dark photon channel

    C. Cazzaniga, et al., Probing the explanation of the muon (g-2) anomaly and thermal light dark matter with the semi-visible dark photon channel. The European Physical Journal C 81 , 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Aaltonen, et al

    T. Aaltonen, et al. , High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector. Science (New York, N.Y.) 376 , 170-176 , 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Thomas and X

    A. Thomas and X. Wang, Constraints on the dark photon from parity violation and the W mass. Physical Review D 106 , 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Galison and A

    P. Galison and A. Manohar, Two Z 's or not two Z 's?. Physics Letters B 136 (4) , 279–283 , 1984

    1984

  4. [12]

    Holdom, Two U(1) 's and ϵ charge shifts

    B. Holdom, Two U(1) 's and ϵ charge shifts. Physics Let- ters B 166 (2) , 196–198 , 1986

    1986

  5. [13]

    Holdom, Searching for ϵ charges and a new U(1)

    B. Holdom, Searching for ϵ charges and a new U(1). Physics Letters B 178 , 65-70 , 1986

    1986

  6. [14]

    Bors´ anyi,et al

    S. Bors´ anyi,et al. , Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics. Nature 539 (7627) , 69–71 , 2016

    2016

  7. [15]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa, and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects. Physical Review D 91 (6) , 065014 , 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Sikivie, Experimental tests of the” invisible” axion

    P. Sikivie, Experimental tests of the” invisible” axion. Physical Review Letters 51 (16) , 1415 , 1983

    1983

  9. [17]

    Sikivie, Detection rates for 'invisible'-axion searches

    P. Sikivie, Detection rates for 'invisible'-axion searches. Physical Review D 32 (11) , 2988 , 1985

    1985

  10. [18]

    Caputo, et al

    A. Caputo, et al. , Dark photon limits: A handbook. Physical Review D 104 (9) , 095029 , 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Read, The local dark matter density

    J. Read, The local dark matter density. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 41 , 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Quiskamp, et al

    A. Quiskamp, et al. , Exclusion of axionlike-particle co- genesis dark matter in a mass window above 100 µ eV. Physical Review Letters 132 (3) , 031601 , 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Alesini, et al

    D. Alesini, et al. , Search for invisible axion dark mat- ter of mass $\mathrmm a=43 µeV with the QUAX– aγ experiment. Phys. Rev. D 103 , 102004 , 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Alesini, et al., Search for Galactic axions with a high- Q dielectric cavity

    D. Alesini, et al., Search for Galactic axions with a high- Q dielectric cavity. Physical Review D 106 (5) , 052007 , 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Kim, et al

    Y. Kim, et al. , Experimental Search for Invisible Dark Matter Axions around 22 µ eV. Physical Review Letters 133 (5) , 051802 , 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Bai, et al., Dark Matter Axion Search with HAYSTAC Phase II

    X. Bai, et al., Dark Matter Axion Search with HAYSTAC Phase II. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08998 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bartram, et al., Search for invisible axion dark matter in the 3.3–4.2 µ eV mass range

    C. Bartram, et al., Search for invisible axion dark matter in the 3.3–4.2 µ eV mass range. Physical review letters 127 (26) , 261803 , 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Cervantes, et al

    R. Cervantes, et al. , Search for 70 µ eV dark photon dark matter with a dielectrically loaded multiwavelength microwave cavity. Physical Review Letters 129 (20) , 201301 , 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Tang, et al

    Z. Tang, et al. , First scan search for dark photon dark matter with a tunable superconducting radio-frequency cavity. Physical Review Letters 133 (2) , 021005 , 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Andrianavalomahefa, et al

    A. Andrianavalomahefa, et al. , Limits from the FUNK experiment on the mixing strength of hidden-photon dark matter in the visible and near-ultraviolet wavelength range. Physical Review D 102 (4) , 042001 , 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Liu, et al

    J. Liu, et al. , Broadband solenoidal haloscope for tera- hertz axion detection. Physical Review Letters 128 (13) , 131801 , 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Kotaka, et al., Search for dark photon dark matter in the mass range 74–110 µ eV with a cryogenic millimeter- wave receiver

    S. Kotaka, et al., Search for dark photon dark matter in the mass range 74–110 µ eV with a cryogenic millimeter- wave receiver. Physical Review Letters 130 (7) , 071805 , 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Ramanathan, et al

    K. Ramanathan, et al. , Wideband direct detection constraints on hidden photon dark matter with the QUALIPHIDE experiment. Physical Review Letters 130 (23) , 231001 , 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Bajjali, et al., First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter

    F. Bajjali, et al., First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter. Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (08) , 077 , 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Jiang, et al

    M. Jiang, et al. , Long-baseline quantum sensor network as dark matter haloscope. Nature communications 15 (1) , 3331 , 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Romanenko, et al., Search for dark photons with su- perconducting radio frequency cavities

    A. Romanenko, et al., Search for dark photons with su- perconducting radio frequency cavities. Physical review letters 130 (26) , 261801 , 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Garcia, et al., First search for axion dark matter with a Madmax prototype

    B. Garcia, et al., First search for axion dark matter with a Madmax prototype. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11777 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kang, et al., Near-quantum-limited haloscope search for dark-photon dark matter enhanced by a high-Q super- conducting cavity

    R. Kang, et al., Near-quantum-limited haloscope search for dark-photon dark matter enhanced by a high-Q super- conducting cavity. Physical Review D 109 (9) , 095037 , 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Tong, Yu, et al

    Y. Tong, Yu, et al. , A high performance fast-Fourier- transform spectrum analyzer for measuring spin noise spectrums. Chinese Physics B 29 (9) , 090704 , 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Kudra, et al

    M. Kudra, et al. , High quality three-dimensional alu- minum microwave cavities. Applied Physics Letters 117 (7) , 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    B. M. Brubaker, et al., HAYSTAC axion search analysis procedure. Phys. Rev. D 96 , 123008 , 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    Cervantes, et al

    R. Cervantes, et al. , ADMX-Orpheus first search for 70 µ eV dark photon dark matter: Detailed design, opera- tions, and analysis. Physical Review D 106 (10) , 102002 , 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Arias, et al., WISPy cold dark matter

    P. Arias, et al., WISPy cold dark matter. Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (06) , 013 , 2012

    2012

  34. [42]

    Caputo, et al

    A. Caputo, et al. , Dark photon limits: A handbook. Phys. Rev. D 104 , 095029 , 2021

    2021

  35. [70]

    Figure 3(c) shows the convolved power excess of the first subset

    In order to recover the signal-to-noise ratio, a convolution integration with the kernel being the normalized line shape of dark photons is applied to the rescaled power excess spectra[40]. Figure 3(c) shows the convolved power excess of the first subset. As Fig. 3(c) shows, t...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.