REVIEW 6 cited by
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Tabular data, structured as rows and columns, is among the most prevalent data types in machine learning classification and regression applications. Models for learning from tabular data have continuously evolved, with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) recently demonstrating promising results through their capability of representation learning. In this survey, we systematically introduce the field of tabular representation learning, covering the background, challenges, and benchmarks, along with the pros and cons of using DNNs. We organize existing methods into three main categories according to their generalization capabilities: specialized, transferable, and general models. Specialized models focus on tasks where training and evaluation occur within the same data distribution. We introduce a hierarchical taxonomy for specialized models based on the key aspects of tabular data -- features, samples, and objectives -- and delve into detailed strategies for obtaining high-quality feature- and sample-level representations. Transferable models are pre-trained on one or more datasets and subsequently fine-tuned on downstream tasks, leveraging knowledge acquired from homogeneous or heterogeneous sources, or even cross-modalities such as vision and language. General models, also known as tabular foundation models, extend this concept further, allowing direct application to downstream tasks without fine-tuning. We group these general models based on the strategies used to adapt across heterogeneous datasets. Additionally, we explore ensemble methods, which integrate the strengths of multiple tabular models. Finally, we discuss representative extensions of tabular learning, including open-environment tabular machine learning, multimodal learning with tabular data, and tabular understanding. More information can be found in the following repository: https://github.com/LAMDA-Tabular/Tabular-Survey.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Foundation Models for Credit Risk Prediction: A Game Changer?
Tabular foundation models, used zero-shot, match or beat tuned gradient boosting on average in credit PD and LGD benchmarks, with a larger edge on small datasets.
-
End-to-End Compression for Tabular Foundation Models
TACO compresses a training table into a few learned latent rows, cutting repeated-batch inference cost up to ~94x and memory up to ~97% while losing ≤0.005 ROC-AUC against its uncompressed same-architecture baseline.
-
Universal Embeddings of Tabular Data
Rows of a table are embedded by training a graph auto-encoder on a table-derived weighted graph, giving smaller universal embeddings than EmbDI-style random-walk embeddings on two Kaggle datasets.
-
Multimodal Tabular Reasoning with Privileged Structured Information
An 8B multimodal LLM trained on 9k reasoning traces distilled from structured tables reaches state-of-the-art open-source accuracy on table-image question answering and fact verification.
-
MMTABREAL: Real-World Benchmark for Multimodal Table Understanding
The paper releases a 500-table, 4,021-question benchmark of real-world multimodal tables and shows that leading vision-language models drop 20-40% in accuracy relative to earlier synthetic benchmarks.
-
CURED: Creating, Understanding, and Repairing Errors Demonstrator
CURED is a web demo that injects realistic errors into tabular data, cleans them with conformal ML, and detects the error mechanism at work.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.