Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Outer regions of galaxy clusters as a new probe to test modifications to gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that stacked caustic surfaces of 122 galaxy clusters, fitted with an NFW potential, set the tightest cluster-based upper limit on f(R)-type modified gravity, |f_R0| ≤ 4.43×10^{-6} at 95% confidence, using caustic…

desk verdict The stacked-caustic f(R) limit is a genuinely new probe and likely the tightest caustics-only cluster bound, but the printed likelihood has a factor-of-two inconsistency that blocks verification of the headline number. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16685 v1 pith:2U23AC7C submitted 2025-04-23 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Minahil Adil Butt , Sandeep Haridasu , Antonaldo Diaferio , Francesco Benetti , Yacer Boumechta , Carlo Baccigalupi , Andrea Lapi This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords caustictechniquegalaxyclustersstackedphasespacemodifiedgravityf(R)chameleonscreeningmass-concentrationrelationclusteroutskirts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the outer regions of galaxy clusters, where modified gravity would most plausibly deviate from general relativity, can be probed with the caustic technique alone. The authors stack 122 clusters from the HeCS surveys into four mass bins, reconstruct the caustic surface $A(r)$ out to projected radius $r_p \sim 4\,\mathrm{Mpc}$, and fit an NFW potential to it, finding caustic and NFW masses that agree within about 10%. This comparison validates the caustic approach and the standard concentration-mass relation, which they then impose as a prior. From the same fits they obtain a data-only calibration of the filling factor, $F_\beta = 0.59 \pm 0.05$. In the chameleon/$f(R)$ framework the stacked profiles translate into $|f_{R0}| \leq 4.43\times 10^{-6}$ at 95% C.L., presented as the tightest cluster-based bound obtained from caustic information alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the caustic surface $A(r)$, the maximum line-of-sight velocity of cluster galaxies at projected radius $r$, which traces the escape velocity and hence the gravitational potential through $-2\Phi(r) = A^2(r)\,g(\beta(r))$, with $g(\beta) = (3-2\beta)/(1-\beta)$ encoding the velocity anisotropy. The paper stacks the phase spaces of 122 clusters into four mass bins using a published algorithm, then fits the NFW potential to $A(r)$ with a Tiret anisotropy profile ($\beta_0 = 0$, $\beta_\infty = 0.5$) and a concentration-mass prior. For modified gravity it replaces the NFW potential gradient by a chameleon-modified form, $d\Phi/dr = G_N M/r^2 + \beta\,d\phi/dr$, with the screening scale set by the field value at infinity. The stacking procedure is what turns noisy individual caustics into a tightly constrained $A(r)$ out to $r_p \sim 4\,\mathrm{Mpc}$.

What would settle it

One decisive check is to run this exact pipeline on a cosmological simulation with a known modified-gravity amplitude, say $|f_{R0}| = 5\times 10^{-6}$, and verify that the stacked caustic fit recovers an upper limit consistent with the input; the result should also persist when the anisotropy parameters are marginalized over rather than fixed to $\beta_\infty = 0.5$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the caustic surface — the locus of escape velocities in the projected phase space of cluster galaxies — is a sufficiently sharp observable to place a stringent bound on modified gravity. Fitting the NFW potential to the measured $A(r)$ for four stacked mass bins gives masses consistent with the model-independent caustic masses at the ~10% level, and the recovered concentration values follow the $\Lambda$CDM concentration-mass relation once the relation is imposed. In the chameleon-screened $f(R)$ scenario, the same fits yield $|f_{R0}| \leq 4.43\times 10^{-6}$ at 95% C.L. ($\phi_{\infty,2} \leq 0.053$), with the tightest contribution coming from the lowest-mass stack. The paper also determines the filling factor $F_\beta = 0.59 \pm 0.05$ from real data alone. This establishes, on the paper's own terms, that cluster outskirts offer a gravity test competitive with hydrostatic and lensing analyses without requiring those observables.

Load-bearing premise

The bound rests on treating each stacked cluster as a spherical NFW halo whose galaxies follow a fixed orbital pattern (the Tiret anisotropy with $\beta_\infty = 0.5$); the paper itself reports that changing this pattern introduces a 10-20% mass bias and that the outer anisotropy is loosely constrained.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cluster outer regions become usable as a standalone gravity laboratory: the caustic method reaches radii where X-ray and SZ data stop, without assuming hydrostatic equilibrium.
  • The consistency of NFW and caustic masses at about 10% supports using the concentration-mass relation as a prior in cluster-mass inference.
  • A data-only filling factor of $F_\beta = 0.59 \pm 0.05$ anchors the caustic calibration without simulation input and can be compared directly with $\Lambda$CDM predictions.
  • The $f(R)$ upper limit from the lowest-mass stack is about twice as tight as the previous hydrostatic-plus-lensing cluster result, and the caustic approach avoids the mass-coupling degeneracy that hydrostatic analyses show.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step would be to apply the same stacked-caustic pipeline to mock clusters built from modified-gravity simulations with a known $f_{R0}$; recovering the injected value would close the loop between the reported limit and the screening physics.
  • The paper's mass-dependent bias when the concentration-mass prior is imposed hints that velocity anisotropy varies across mass bins; jointly solving the Jeans equation for the stacked phase space would turn this systematic into a measurable profile.
  • Because the observable directly tracks the potential, the formalism should transfer to other outskirts-sensitive gravity models, such as generalized chameleons or models with a screened fifth force, with only the potential-gradient term changed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper stacks 122 galaxy clusters from the HeCS-SZ, HeCS-redMapper, and HeCS surveys into four mass bins, constructs stacked caustic surfaces, fits NFW potentials to the caustic amplitudes, and uses the fits to (i) validate caustic masses against NFW-based masses, (ii) estimate the filling factor F_beta = 0.59 +/- 0.05, and (iii) constrain chameleon/f(R) gravity, reporting |f_R0| <= 4.43e-6 at 95% C.L. from an importance-sampled joint posterior. The analysis is caustics-only, i.e., it does not use hydrostatic, lensing, or X-ray/SZ mass information.

Significance. The direction is timely and the data treatment is mostly careful: stacking suppresses caustic scatter, bootstrap cross-validation supports the caustic locations, and fitting the potential directly to the caustic surface avoids the pressure-integration degeneracies of hydrostatic analyses. If the likelihood is corrected to match the stated caustic-potential relation, the method could provide a genuinely independent cluster-scale f(R) test that extends beyond the virial radius. The data-driven estimate of F_beta is also of independent interest. However, the printed likelihood equation and the treatment of the velocity-anisotropy profile make the headline constraint conditional and not reproducible as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.5, Eq. (17) versus Sec. 2, Eq. (1)] Eq. (17) fits the caustic amplitude A_i against sqrt(-Phi_NFW/g_beta), but Eq. (1) states -2Phi = A^2 g_beta, so the correct model amplitude is sqrt(-2Phi_NFW/g_beta). Equations (8) and (10) are the standard NFW/physical potentials, so no redefinition of Phi absorbs the factor of 2. As printed, the model amplitudes are a factor sqrt(2) too small, which would require best-fit masses roughly twice the model-independent caustic masses; Table 1 shows ratios M_NFW/M_Cau near 1.0-1.6 and Table 2 gives F_beta ~ 0.6, suggesting that the factor is present in the code but missing from the paper. Because Eq. (19) is obtained from this same likelihood, the headline |f_R0| <= 4.43e-6 limit cannot be independently reproduced from the manuscript as written. Please correct Eq. (17) and state explicitly whether the reported numbers were produced with the factor 2 included.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Sec. 5.4, App. A.2] The caustic-only modified-gravity fit fixes beta_infinity = 0.5 in the Tiret anisotropy model, while App. A.2 reports that for A2029 beta_infinity is only weakly constrained (beta_infinity <= 0.8 at 2 sigma) and Sec. 5.4 attributes a 10-20% mass bias to the fixed anisotropy choice. Since g_beta(beta_infinity) normalizes the potential in Eq. (1), the inferred phi_infinity,2 upper limits depend directly on this assumption. The statement in Sec. 5.3 that marginalizing over beta_0 and beta_infinity for the stacked clusters gives mildly enlarged uncertainties is not shown in any figure or table. Please report the stacked modified-gravity constraints with beta_infinity marginalized over a range consistent with the A2029 validation, or quantify the shift in Eq. (19) when beta_infinity is varied over, e.g., 0 to 0.7.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 3, Range IV, 'w/o c-M' row] In Table 3, the Range IV 'w/o c-M' row lists c_NFW = 10.56 and M_NFW = 5.32, whereas Table 1 for the same case lists c_NFW = 5.47 and M_NFW = 10.65; the two columns appear to be transposed.
  2. [Sec. 6 versus Sec. 3] The conclusions state that the clusters lie in the redshift range z in {0.01, 0.1}, but Sec. 3 gives z in {0.08, 0.3} for the HeCS samples; this appears to be a typographical error and should be corrected.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 5.1] The paper describes the NFW recovery as a 'first-order validation' of the concentration-mass relation, but the main fits impose the M16 relation as a prior; only the no-prior, poorly constrained concentration posteriors can serve as an independent check, so the wording overstates the validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the f(R) constraint is obtained by fitting external caustic data to the chameleon potential, not by re-deriving an input.

full rationale

The caustic amplitudes A_i are external observables measured from the HeCS redshift diagrams. Equation (1) relates A to the gravitational potential, and the analysis fits NFW and chameleon potentials to A via Eq. (17), so the f_R0 bound in Eq. (19) is the product of a fit rather than a restatement of the model inputs. The c-M prior in Eq. (11) is external (Merten et al. 2015); the paper's 'validation' of that relation is a consistency check on the same data, but Table 3 shows nearly identical constraints with and without the prior, so the prior is not load-bearing. The quoted F_beta = 0.59 +/- 0.05 is a calibration output that reconciles the NFW-fitted and caustic masses and is not used as an input in the modified-gravity fit. The fixed Tiret anisotropy beta_infinity = 0.5 is a stated assumption following the authors' prior work, and App. A.2/B shows that marginalizing over it yields consistent results, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The factor-of-two inconsistency between Eq. (1) and the printed Eq. (17) is a genuine reproducibility/correctness concern, but it is an internal error rather than a circular reduction of the claimed result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard astrophysical inputs (NFW profile, chameleon model, M16 c-M relation) plus a hand-fixed anisotropy parameter. The paper's own freedom is in M200, c200, sigma_int, and the chameleon field parameters; the reported f_R0 limit is robust to the c-M prior (Table 3) but not to the NFW and anisotropy assumptions.

free parameters (6)
  • M200 per stacked mass bin = I: 2.21±0.25, II: 3.93±0.44, III: 5.84±0.53, IV: 10.56±0.86 (×10^14 M_sun, w/o c-M prior); similar with prior
    Fitted to the stacked caustic surfaces via the NFW potential; these are the core mass outputs.
  • c200 per stacked mass bin = I: 2.87, II: 3.51, III: 4.45, IV: 5.32 (w/o prior); 3.79, 4.31, 4.36, 3.89 (with prior)
    Concentration fitted to the caustic surface; poorly constrained without the c-M prior, as noted in Sec. 5.1.
  • beta_infinity (Tiret anisotropy outer value) = 0.5 (fixed)
    Chosen by hand from the A2029 validation; paper admits it is fairly unconstrained (Sec. 4.2, App. A.2).
  • sigma_int (intrinsic scatter) = log sigma_int ≈ -1.7 to -3.4 across bins
    Free parameter in the likelihood (eq. 17) to absorb scatter beyond caustic errors; values reported in Tables 1 and 3.
  • phi_infinity,2 (asymptotic chameleon field in f(R)) = ≤ 0.053 (95% C.L.), |f_R0| ≤ 4.43×10^-6
    Fitted in the MG analysis for beta = sqrt(1/6); this is the central constraint of the paper.
  • beta_2 (chameleon coupling) = fixed at sqrt(1/6) for f(R)
    Fixed rather than fitted for the reported limit; the general-case posteriors in fig. 6 cover this parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption NFW density profile (eq. 5) describes the cluster mass distribution from ~30-50 kpc to 4 Mpc
    Used to build the potential in eq. (8) that is fitted to the caustic surface; deviation from NFW would change the f_R0 limit.
  • domain assumption Caustic amplitude relation -2Φ = A^2 g_beta (eq. 1) holds in both GR and chameleon gravity
    Bridges the observable A(r) to the potential; assumed unchanged in the modified-gravity case.
  • ad hoc to paper Tiret anisotropy profile with beta_0 = 0 and beta_infinity = 0.5 (eq. 9)
    Fixes galaxy velocity anisotropy; App. A.2 shows beta_infinity is poorly constrained and Sec. 5.4 shows it causes a 10-20% mass bias.
  • domain assumption M16 concentration-mass relation (eq. 11) as a Gaussian prior
    External prior from Merten et al. (2015); the paper validates it with the same data (Sec. 5.1) but App. A.1 shows a weak match.
  • domain assumption Chameleon-modified potential (eq. 15) from Terukina et al. (2014)
    The gravity model being tested; its functional form is taken from the literature, not derived here.
  • domain assumption Stacking clusters in redshift space at z=0 preserves the phase-space structure and the caustic surface
    Needed to combine 122 clusters into four composite phase spaces (Sec. 4.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Outer regions of galaxy clusters as a new probe to test modifications to gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2U23AC7C

@misc{pith2026250416685,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Outer regions of galaxy clusters as a new probe to test modifications to gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2U23AC7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16685}
}
abstract

We apply the caustic technique to samples of galaxy clusters stacked in redshift space to estimate the gravitational potential in the cluster's outer region and test modifications to the standard theory of gravity. We separate 122 galaxy clusters from the HeCS-SZ, HeCS-redMapper, and HeCS samples into four samples with increasing mass; we estimate four robust, highly constraining caustic profiles for these samples. The caustic masses of the four stacked clusters agree within $ 10\%$ with the corresponding median values of each cluster sample. By adopting the NFW density profile to model the gravitational potential, we recover the caustic profile $\mathcal{A}(r)$ up to radius $r_{\rm p} \sim 4.0\, {\rm Mpc}$. This comparison is a first-order validation of the mass-concentration relation for galaxy clusters expected in the $\Lambda$CDM model. We thus impose this correlation as a prior in our analysis. Based on our stacked clusters, we estimate the value of the filling factor, which enters the caustic technique, $\mathcal{F}_{\beta} = 0.59\pm 0.05$; we derive this value using real data alone and find it consistent with the value usually adopted in the literature. We then use the caustic profiles $\mathcal{A}(r)$ of the stacked clusters to constrain the chameleon gravity model. We find that the caustic profiles provide a stringent upper limit of $|f_{\rm R0}| \lesssim 4 \times 10^{-6}$ at $95\%$ C.L. limits in the $f(\mathcal{R})$ scenario. The formalism developed here shall be further refined to test modifications to gravity in the extended outer weak gravitational regions of galaxy clusters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16685 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Comparison of the caustic (MCau 200 ) with the NFW (MNFW 200 ) masses (see section 4.1 for details). The fitting range for the NFW masses is 0 < (rp/Mpc) < 4. The open symbols represent the masses of the stacked clusters and the solid symbols represent the mean masses of the stacked clusters. The small filled circles show the individual clusters. Right: We compare the caustic masses estimated in our analysis w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top Panels: Distribution of the galaxies (blue points) in the redshift diagram, namely the plane of the redshift vs. the projected distance from the cluster center, of the four stacked clusters. The solid line and the gray area show the caustic location along with its uncertainty. The lower caustic is omitted. Bottom Panels: Ratio of the mean caustic amplitude obtained from the bootstrap analysis containing only 50%… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: We show the posteriors for the 68% and 95% C.L. for the mass and concentration parameters in the standard GR case from the NFW mass profile for each of the mass ranges as described in table 1. Right: Same as the left panel but with the c-M relation M16 (J. Merten et al. 2015) imposed as a prior. We show the 95% C.L. limits of the M16 in gray. are representative of individual clusters, which allows us to procee… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean and 1σ C.L. regions of MNFW(r) (top panel) profiles for the case of GR for each of the 4 ranges. The vertical lines represent r200 for each of the 4 ranges. Similarly, of gβ(r) (center panel) and Fβ(r) (bottom panel) for the case of GR for each of the 4 ranges. Th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Comparison of MNFW(r)/MCau(r) (bottom panel) for the case of General Relativity for each of the 4 ranges when the caustic mass is estimated assuming Fβ(r) computed from the NFW fit to the caustic surface. In contrast, the top panel shows the same comparison when …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We show the 95% (2σ) and 99% (3σ) C.L. posteriors for the modified gravity parameters now written in terms of, {ϕ∞,2 = 1 − exp (ϕ∞10−4MPl), β2 = β/(1 + β)}, in all 4 stacked caustics ranges of mass, going from range I to IV from left to right. We also show β = p 1/6 as…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posteriors of ϕ∞,2 for β = p 1/6 fixed, which corresponds to the f(R) gravity scenario. The vertical dash– dotted line represents the 95% C.L. upper limit estimated in Y. Boumechta et al. (2023) obtained using 5 stacked clus￾ters along with the mass priors from weak le…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: We show the comparison of the mass bias when utilizing different radial ranges to fit the NFW potential. Right: Same as the left panel but with the lower limit of rp > 0.5 imposed on the data. APPENDIX Here we present the discussion pertaining to a few systematic…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: We show the posteriors for the 68% and 95% C.L. for the mass, concentration, and the chameleon screening parameters, ϕ∞,2 and β2, included. Here, the anisotropy profile is kept fixed as in the main analysis. Note that, in the main text, the constraints on the mod…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamical analysis of stacked samples of asymmetric, non-static, self-gravitating systems

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacked cluster dynamical masses overestimate the true mean mass by about 20% at the virial radius, and this can be corrected with two simulation-calibrated factors.

  2. Cluster Lensing Mass Inversion (CLUMI+): Combining Dynamics and Weak Lensing around Galaxy Clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLUMI+ jointly models weak and strong lensing with caustic escape-velocity data, recovering cluster mass profiles from core to infall without equilibrium assumptions.

  3. AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-1000: Splashback radius from weak lensing and cluster-galaxy correlation function

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The splashback radius of AMICO KiDS-1000 clusters, measured with weak lensing and cluster-galaxy clustering, agrees with ΛCDM predictions, with clustering achieving 10% precision.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    B ! B ! BA i! B ! B ! u@Z ! B:H - B !D B ! H ! B Q /y׻Ş= BnЇ>f O ! B4 E /D

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  4. [4]

    S., & Danese, L

    Benetti, F., Lapi, A., Gandolfi, G., Haridasu, B. S., & Danese, L. 2023, title Dark Matter in Fractional Gravity II: Tests in Galaxy Clusters , Universe, 9, 329, 10.3390/universe9070329

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9070329 2023

  5. [5]

    2024, title A relativistic scalar model for fractional interaction between dark matter and gravity , Class

    Benetti, F., Lapi, A., Gandolfi, G., & Liberati, S. 2024, title A relativistic scalar model for fractional interaction between dark matter and gravity , Class. Quant. Grav., 41, 175010, 10.1088/1361-6382/ad66a8

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad66a8 2024

  6. [6]

    2013, title Dark Matter Halo Profiles of Massive Clusters: Theory versus Observations , , 766, 32, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/32

    Bhattacharya , S., Habib , S., Heitmann , K., & Vikhlinin , A. 2013, title Dark Matter Halo Profiles of Massive Clusters: Theory versus Observations , , 766, 32, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/32

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/32 2013

  7. [7]

    2016, title On the nature of hydrostatic equilibrium in galaxy clusters , Astrophys

    Biffi, V., Borgani, S., Murante, G., et al. 2016, title On the nature of hydrostatic equilibrium in galaxy clusters , Astrophys. J., 827, 112, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/112

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/2/112 2016

  8. [8]

    1987, Galactic dynamics

    Binney , J., & Tremaine , S. 1987, Galactic dynamics

    1987

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    2003, title The Mass Profile of Galaxy Clusters out to ∼2r200, The Astrophysical Journal, 585, 205–214, 10.1086/345893

    Biviano, A., & Girardi, M. 2003, title The Mass Profile of Galaxy Clusters out to ∼2r200, The Astrophysical Journal, 585, 205–214, 10.1086/345893

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    2021, title The GOGREEN survey: Internal dynamics of clusters of galaxies at redshift 0.9 1.4 , Astron

    Biviano, A., et al. 2021, title The GOGREEN survey: Internal dynamics of clusters of galaxies at redshift 0.9 1.4 , Astron. Astrophys., 650, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140564

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    2024, title Testing non-local gravity through Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies kinematics , Phys

    Bouch\`e, F., Capozziello, S., De Simone, C., & Salzano, V. 2024, title Testing non-local gravity through Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies kinematics , Phys. Dark Univ., 46, 101579, 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101579

    2024

  4. [12]

    S., Pizzuti, L., et al

    Boumechta, Y., Haridasu, B. S., Pizzuti, L., et al. 2023, title Constraining chameleon screening using galaxy cluster dynamics , Phys. Rev. D, 108, 044007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.044007

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Haridasu, B

    Butt, M. A., Haridasu, B. S., Boumechta, Y., et al. 2024 a , title Caustic and hydrostatic mass bias: Implications for modified gravity , Phys. Rev. D, 109, 064006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064006

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Haridasu, S., Boumechta, Y., et al

    Butt, M. A., Haridasu, S., Boumechta, Y., et al. 2024 b , in 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology . 2412.09134

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    F., et al

    Cardone, V. F., et al. 2020, title Jointly fitting weak lensing, X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich data to constrain scalar-tensor theories with clusters of galaxies , arXiv, 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064065

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    2020, title Mass Bias of Weak-lensing Shear-selected Galaxy Cluster Samples, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab74d3

    Chen, K.-F., Oguri, M., Lin, Y.-T., & Miyazaki, S. 2020, title Mass Bias of Weak-lensing Shear-selected Galaxy Cluster Samples, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab74d3

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    L., Habib, S., Heitmann, K., et al

    Child, H. L., Habib, S., Heitmann, K., et al. 2018, title Halo Profiles and the Concentration–Mass Relation for a ΛCDM Universe, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf95

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, title Towards 1\

    Cromer, D., Battaglia, N., Miyatake, H., & Simet, M. 2022, title Towards 1\

    2022

  11. [19]

    M., Governato, F., Stadel, J., & Quinn, T

    Crone, M. M., Governato, F., Stadel, J., & Quinn, T. 1997, title Prospects for Cosmology with Cluster Mass Profiles, The Astrophysical Journal, 477, L5–L8, 10.1086/310519

    1997 doi

  12. [20]

    1999, title Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 309, 610, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02864.x

    Diaferio, A. 1999, title Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 309, 610, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02864.x

    1999

  13. [21]

    2009, title Measuring the mass profile of galaxy clusters beyond their virial radius , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0901.0868, 10.48550/arXiv.0901.0868

    Diaferio , A. 2009, title Measuring the mass profile of galaxy clusters beyond their virial radius , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0901.0868, 10.48550/arXiv.0901.0868

    2009 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Diaferio, A., & Geller, M. J. 1997, title Infall Regions of Galaxy Clusters, The Astrophysical Journal, 481, 633, 10.1086/304075

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    J., & Rines, K

    Diaferio, A., Geller, M. J., & Rines, K. J. 2005, title Caustic and Weak-Lensing Estimators of Galaxy Cluster Masses, The Astrophysical Journal, 628, L97, 10.1086/432880

    2005 doi

  16. [25]

    A., & Macciò, A

    Dutton, A. A., & Macciò, A. V. 2014, title Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441, 3359–3374, 10.1093/mnras/stu742

    2014 doi

  17. [26]

    2019, title Non-thermal pressure support in X-COP galaxy clusters , Astron

    Eckert, D., et al. 2019, title Non-thermal pressure support in X-COP galaxy clusters , Astron. Astrophys., 621, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833324

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    2013, title Mass profiles of Galaxy Clusters from X-ray analysis , Space Sci

    Ettori, S., Donnarumma, A., Pointecouteau, E., et al. 2013, title Mass profiles of Galaxy Clusters from X-ray analysis , Space Sci. Rev., 177, 119, 10.1007/s11214-013-9976-7

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    2010, title Mass profiles and c-M _ DM relation in X-ray luminous galaxy clusters , , 524, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015271

    Ettori , S., Gastaldello , F., Leccardi , A., et al. 2010, title Mass profiles and c-M _ DM relation in X-ray luminous galaxy clusters , , 524, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015271

    2010 doi

  20. [29]

    2019, title Hydrostatic mass profiles in X-COP galaxy clusters , Astron

    Ettori, S., Ghirardini, V., Eckert, D., et al. 2019, title Hydrostatic mass profiles in X-COP galaxy clusters , Astron. Astrophys., 621, A39, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833323

    2019 doi

  21. [30]

    A., Wojtak, R., Hansen, S

    Falco, M., Mamon, G. A., Wojtak, R., Hansen, S. H., & Gottl\"ober, S. 2013, title Dynamical signatures of infall around galaxy clusters: a generalized Jeans equation , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 436, 2639, 10.1093/mnras/stt1768

    2013 doi

  22. [31]

    Famaey, B., Pizzuti, L., & Saltas, I. D. 2024, title On the nature of the missing mass of galaxy clusters in MOND: the view from gravitational lensing , 2410.02612

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    2016, title corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 24, 10.21105/joss.00024

    Foreman-Mackey, D. 2016, title corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 24, 10.21105/joss.00024

    2016 doi

  24. [33]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, title emcee: The MCMC Hammer , Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  25. [34]

    S., Liberati, S., & Lapi, A

    Gandolfi, G., Haridasu, B. S., Liberati, S., & Lapi, A. 2023, title Looking for Traces of Non-minimally Coupled Dark Matter in the X-COP Galaxy Clusters Sample , 2305.13974

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    J., Diaferio, A., & Serra, K

    Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., & Serra, K. J. R. A. L. 2013, title Measuring the Mass Distribution in Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys. J., 764, 58, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/58

    2013 doi

  27. [36]

    Gifford, D., Kern, N., & Miller, C. J. 2017, title Stacking Caustic Masses from Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys. J., 834, 204, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/204

    2017 doi

  28. [37]

    2013, title A Systematic Analysis of Caustic Methods for Galaxy Cluster Masses , , 773, 116, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/116

    Gifford , D., Miller , C., & Kern , N. 2013, title A Systematic Analysis of Caustic Methods for Galaxy Cluster Masses , , 773, 116, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/116

    2013 doi

  29. [38]

    Gifford , D., & Miller , C. J. 2013, title Velocity Anisotropy and Shape Bias in the Caustic Technique , , 768, L32, 10.1088/2041-8205/768/2/L32

    2013 doi

  30. [39]

    J., Motl, P

    Hallman, E. J., Motl, P. M., Burns, J. O., & Norman, M. L. 2006, title Challenges for Precision Cosmology with X-ray and Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Gas Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys. J., 648, 852, 10.1086/505317

    2006 doi

  31. [40]

    S., Karmakar, P., De Petris, M., Cardone, V

    Haridasu, B. S., Karmakar, P., De Petris, M., Cardone, V. F., & Maoli, R. 2023, title Testing generalized scalar-tensor theories of gravity with clusters of galaxies , Phys. Rev. D, 107, 124059, 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124059

    2023 doi

  32. [41]

    2017, title Generalizing MOND to explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters , Astron

    Hodson, A., & Zhao, H. 2017, title Generalizing MOND to explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters , Astron. Astrophys., 598, A127, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629358

    2017 doi

  33. [42]

    T., McNamara, B

    Hogan, M. T., McNamara, B. R., Pulido, F., et al. 2017, title Mass Distribution in Galaxy Cluster Cores, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5f56

    2017 doi

  34. [43]

    1987, title Clustering in real space and in redshift space , , 227, 1, 10.1093/mnras/227.1.1

    Kaiser , N. 1987, title Clustering in real space and in redshift space , , 227, 1, 10.1093/mnras/227.1.1

    1987 doi

  35. [44]

    2024, title A Deep Redshift Survey of the Perseus Cluster (A426): Spatial Distribution and Kinematics of Galaxies , Astrophys

    Kang, W., Seong Hwang, H., Song, H., et al. 2024, title A Deep Redshift Survey of the Perseus Cluster (A426): Spatial Distribution and Kinematics of Galaxies , Astrophys. J. Suppl., 272, 22, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad390d

    2024 doi

  36. [45]

    2013, title Les Houches Lectures on Physics Beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology, 1312.2006

    Khoury, J. 2013, title Les Houches Lectures on Physics Beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology, 1312.2006

    2013 arXiv

  37. [46]

    A., Seiberg, N., Steinhardt, P

    Khoury, J., Ovrut, B. A., Seiberg, N., Steinhardt, P. J., & Turok, N. 2002, title From big crunch to big bang , Phys. Rev., D65, 086007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.086007

    2002 doi

  38. [47]

    2004, title Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space , Phys

    Khoury, J., & Weltman, A. 2004, title Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space , Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 171104, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171104

    2004 doi

  39. [48]

    2001, title Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing II , Astron

    King, L., & Schneider, P. 2001, title Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing II , Astron. Astrophys., 369, 1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010030

    2001 doi

  40. [49]

    J., Salgado, M., Sudarsky, D., & Vucetich, H

    Kraiselburd, L., Landau, S. J., Salgado, M., Sudarsky, D., & Vucetich, H. 2018, title Equivalence Principle in Chameleon Models , Phys. Rev. D, 97, 104044, 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104044

    2018 doi

  41. [50]

    Köhlinger, F., Hoekstra, H., & Eriksen, M. 2015, title Statistical uncertainties and systematic errors in weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3108–3120, 10.1093/mnras/stv1852

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    2022, title Multicomponent DHOST analysis in galaxy clusters , Mon

    Laudato, E., Salzano, V., & Umetsu, K. 2022, title Multicomponent DHOST analysis in galaxy clusters , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 511, 1878, 10.1093/mnras/stac180

    2022 doi

  43. [52]

    2019, title GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples , 1910.13970

    Lewis, A. 2019, title GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples , 1910.13970

    2019 arXiv

  44. [53]

    P., et al

    Li, P., Tian, Y., J\'ulio, M. P., et al. 2023, title Measuring galaxy cluster mass profiles into the low-acceleration regime with galaxy kinematics , Astron. Astrophys., 677, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346431

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    2000, title Probing the gravitational potential of a nearby lensing cluster abell 2104 , Astron

    Liang, H., Lemonon, L., Valtchanov, I., Pierre, M., & Soucail, G. 2000, title Probing the gravitational potential of a nearby lensing cluster abell 2104 , Astron. Astrophys., 363, 440. astro-ph/0010297

    2000 arXiv

  46. [55]

    2018, title Inside a Beehive: The Multiple Merging Processes in the Galaxy Cluster Abell 2142, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad090

    Liu, A., Yu, H., Diaferio, A., et al. 2018, title Inside a Beehive: The Multiple Merging Processes in the Galaxy Cluster Abell 2142, The Astrophysical Journal, 863, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad090

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    Logan, C. H. A., Maughan, B. J., Diaferio, A., et al. 2022, title i Chandra /i follow-up of the Hectospec Cluster Survey: Comparison of caustic and hydrostatic masses and constraints on the hydrostatic bias, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243347

    2022 doi

  48. [57]

    D., Bose, S., Angulo, R

    Ludlow, A. D., Bose, S., Angulo, R. E., et al. 2016, title The mass concentration redshift relation of cold and warm dark matter haloes , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 460, 1214, 10.1093/mnras/stw1046

    2016 doi

  49. [58]

    A., Cava , A., Biviano , A., et al

    Mamon , G. A., Cava , A., Biviano , A., et al. 2019, title Structural and dynamical modeling of WINGS clusters. II. The orbital anisotropies of elliptical, spiral, and lenticular galaxies , , 631, A131, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935081

    2019 doi

  50. [59]

    A., & Lokas, E

    Mamon, G. A., & Lokas, E. L. 2005, title Confronting lambda-CDM with the optical observations of elliptical galaxies. 2. Weighing the dark matter component , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 363, 705, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09400.x

    2005

  51. [60]

    J., Giles, P

    Maughan, B. J., Giles, P. A., Rines, K. J., et al. 2016, title Hydrostatic and caustic mass profiles of galaxy clusters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461, 4182, 10.1093/mnras/stw1610

    2016 doi

  52. [61]

    Melin, J.-B., & Bartlett, J. G. 2015, title Measuring cluster masses with CMB lensing: a statistical approach, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 578, A21, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424720

    2015 doi

  53. [62]

    2014, title The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation , Astrophys

    Meneghetti, M., et al. 2014, title The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation , Astrophys. J., 797, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/34

    2014 doi

  54. [63]

    2015, title CLASH: THE CONCENTRATION-MASS RELATION OF GALAXY CLUSTERS, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 4, 10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/4

    Merten, J., Meneghetti, M., Postman, M., et al. 2015, title CLASH: THE CONCENTRATION-MASS RELATION OF GALAXY CLUSTERS, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 4, 10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/4

    2015 doi

  55. [64]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, title The Structure of cold dark matter halos , Astrophys. J., 462, 563, 10.1086/177173

    1996 doi

  56. [65]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1997, title A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , , 490, 493, 10.1086/304888

    1997 doi

  57. [66]

    2019, title The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release , Comput

    Nelson, D., et al. 2019, title The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release , Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol., 6, 2, 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    2019 doi

  58. [67]

    2024, title The NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zeldovich Large Program - Sample and upcoming product public release , EPJ Web Conf., 293, 00040, 10.1051/epjconf/202429300040

    Perotto, L., et al. 2024, title The NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zeldovich Large Program - Sample and upcoming product public release , EPJ Web Conf., 293, 00040, 10.1051/epjconf/202429300040

    2024

  59. [68]

    B., et al

    Pierre, M., Pacaud, F., Juin, J. B., et al. 2011, title Precision cosmology with a wide area XMM cluster survey: Wide area XMM cluster survey, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414, 1732–1746, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18511.x

    2011

  60. [69]

    J., Kenyon, S

    Pizzardo, M., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., Damjanov, I., & Diaferio, A. 2023, title An IllustrisTNG view of the caustic technique for galaxy cluster mass estimation , Astron. Astrophys., 675, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346545

    2023 doi

  61. [70]

    2024 a , title Testing Refracted Gravity with kinematics of galaxy clusters , 2410.19698

    Pizzuti, L., Fantoccoli, F., Broccolato, V., Biviano, A., & Diaferio, A. 2024 a , title Testing Refracted Gravity with kinematics of galaxy clusters , 2410.19698

    2024 arXiv

  62. [71]

    D., & Amendola, L

    Pizzuti, L., Saltas, I. D., & Amendola, L. 2020, title MG-MAMPOSSt: A code to test modifications of gravity with the dynamics of galaxy clusters , 2011.15089

    2020 arXiv

  63. [72]

    D., Biviano, A., Mamon, G., & Amendola, L

    Pizzuti, L., Saltas, I. D., Biviano, A., Mamon, G., & Amendola, L. 2023, title MG-MAMPOSSt, a Fortran code to test gravity at galaxy-cluster scales , J. Open Source Softw., 8, 4800, 10.21105/joss.04800

    2023 doi

  64. [73]

    2024 b , title Mass modeling and kinematics of galaxy clusters in modified gravity , JCAP, 11, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/014

    Pizzuti, L., Boumechta, Y., Haridasu, S., et al. 2024 b , title Mass modeling and kinematics of galaxy clusters in modified gravity , JCAP, 11, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/014

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    2006, title Systematics in the x-ray cluster mass estimators , Mon

    Rasia, E., Ettori, S., Moscardini, L., et al. 2006, title Systematics in the x-ray cluster mass estimators , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 369, 2013, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10466.x

    2006

  66. [75]

    S., Smith, R

    Reed, D. S., Smith, R. E., Potter, D., et al. 2013, title Toward an accurate mass function for precision cosmology , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 431, 1866, 10.1093/mnras/stt301

    2013 doi

  67. [76]

    Reg\"os , E., & Geller , M. J. 1989, title Infall Patterns around Rich Clusters of Galaxies , , 98, 755, 10.1086/115177

    1989 doi

  68. [77]

    J., Diaferio, A., & Kurtz, M

    Rines, K., Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., & Kurtz, M. J. 2013, title MEASURING THE ULTIMATE HALO MASS OF GALAXY CLUSTERS: REDSHIFTS AND MASS PROFILES FROM THE HECTOSPEC CLUSTER SURVEY (HeCS), The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 15, 10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/15

    2013 doi

  69. [78]

    J., Kurtz, M

    Rines, K., Geller, M. J., Kurtz, M. J., & Diaferio, A. 2003, title CAIRNS: The Cluster and Infall Region Nearby Survey. I. Redshifts and Mass Profiles, The Astronomical Journal, 126, 2152–2170, 10.1086/378599

    2003 doi

  70. [79]

    J., Kurtz , M

    Rines , K., Geller , M. J., Kurtz , M. J., & Diaferio , A. 2005, title CAIRNS: The Cluster and Infall Region Nearby Survey. III. Environmental Dependence of H Properties of Galaxies , , 130, 1482, 10.1086/433173

    2005 doi

  71. [80]

    J., Geller, M

    Rines, K. J., Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., & Hwang, H. S. 2016, title HeCS-SZ: THE HECTOSPEC SURVEY OF SUNYAEV–ZELDOVICH-SELECTED CLUSTERS, The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 63, 10.3847/0004-637x/819/1/63

    2016 doi

  72. [81]

    J., Geller, M

    Rines, K. J., Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., Hwang, H. S., & Sohn, J. 2018, title HeCS-red: Dense Hectospec Surveys of redMaPPer-selected Clusters, The Astrophysical Journal, 862, 172, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacd49

    2018 doi

  73. [82]

    Rozo, E., & Rykoff, E. S. 2014, title redMaPPer II: X-ray and SZ Performance Benchmarks for the SDSS Catalog , Astrophys. J., 783, 80, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/80

    2014 doi

  74. [83]

    S., McKay, T

    Rykoff, E. S., McKay, T. A., Becker, M. R., et al. 2008, title Measuring the mean and scatter of the X-ray luminosity -- optical richness relation for maxBCG galaxy clusters , Astrophys. J., 675, 1106, 10.1086/527537

    2008 doi

  75. [84]

    2014, title The X-CLASS - redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison : I

    Sadibekova, T., Pierre, M., Clerc, N., et al. 2014, title The X-CLASS - redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison : I. Identification procedures , Astron. Astrophys., 571, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423794

    2014 doi

  76. [85]

    F., Dabrowski, M

    Salzano, V., Mota, D. F., Dabrowski, M. P., & Capozziello, S. 2016, title No need for dark matter in galaxy clusters within Galileon theory , JCAP, 10, 033, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/033

    2016 doi

  77. [86]

    2020, title CLASH-VLT: a full dynamical reconstruction of the mass profile of Abell S1063 from 1 kpc out to the virial radius , , 637, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037521

    Sartoris , B., Biviano , A., Rosati , P., et al. 2020, title CLASH-VLT: a full dynamical reconstruction of the mass profile of Abell S1063 from 1 kpc out to the virial radius , , 637, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037521

    2020 doi

  78. [87]

    S., Bower, R

    Schaller, M., Frenk, C. S., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, title The effect of baryons on the inner density profiles of rich clusters , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 343, 10.1093/mnras/stv1341

    2015 doi

  79. [88]

    2000, title Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing: Shear versus magnification information , Astron

    Schneider, P., King, L., & Erben, T. 2000, title Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing: Shear versus magnification information , Astron. Astrophys., 353, 41. astro-ph/9907143

    2000 arXiv

  80. [89]

    L., & Diaferio , A

    Serra , A. L., & Diaferio , A. 2013, title Identification of Members in the Central and Outer Regions of Galaxy Clusters , , 768, 116, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/116

    2013 doi

  81. [90]

    L., Diaferio, A., Murante, G., & Borgani, S

    Serra, A. L., Diaferio, A., Murante, G., & Borgani, S. 2010, title Measuring the escape velocity and mass profiles of galaxy clusters beyond their virial radius, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, no, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17946.x

    2010

  82. [91]

    2017, title Weak lensing measurement of the mass richness relation of SDSS redMaPPer clusters , Mon

    Simet, M., McClintock, T., Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2017, title Weak lensing measurement of the mass richness relation of SDSS redMaPPer clusters , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 466, 3103, 10.1093/mnras/stw3250

    2017 doi

  83. [92]

    J., Diaferio, A., & Rines, K

    Sohn, J., Geller, M. J., Diaferio, A., & Rines, K. J. 2020, title Velocity Dispersions of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Their Host Clusters, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, 129, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6e6a

    2020 doi

  84. [93]

    J., Zahid, H

    Sohn, J., Geller, M. J., Zahid, H. J., et al. 2017, title The Velocity Dispersion Function of Very Massive Galaxy Clusters: Abell 2029 and Coma, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 229, 20, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa653e

    2017 doi

  85. [94]

    J., & Halenka, V

    Stark, A., Miller, C. J., & Halenka, V. 2019, title Deriving galaxy cluster velocity anisotropy profiles from a joint analysis of dynamical and weak lensing data , Astrophys. J., 874, 33, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab06fa

    2019 doi

  86. [95]

    H., Martizzi, D., Moore, B., & Tessier, R

    Svensmark, J., Hansen, S. H., Martizzi, D., Moore, B., & Tessier, R. 2020, title Inferring the dark matter velocity anisotropy to the cluster edge , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 500, 3151, 10.1093/mnras/staa3279

    2020 doi

  87. [96]

    2000, title X-ray measurements of the gravitational potential profile in the central region of the abell 1060 cluster of galaxies , Astrophys

    Tamura, T., Makishima, K., Fukazawa, Y., Ikebe, Y., & Xu, H. 2000, title X-ray measurements of the gravitational potential profile in the central region of the abell 1060 cluster of galaxies , Astrophys. J., 535, 602, 10.1086/308882

    2000 doi

  88. [97]

    T., Stapelberg, S., Hug, D., & Bartelmann, M

    Tchernin, C., Lau, E. T., Stapelberg, S., Hug, D., & Bartelmann, M. 2020, title Characterizing galaxy clusters by their gravitational potential: systematics of cluster potential reconstruction , Astron. Astrophys., 644, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937028

    2020 doi

  89. [98]

    2014, title Testing chameleon gravity with the Coma cluster , JCAP, 04, 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/013

    Terukina, A., Lombriser, L., Yamamoto, K., et al. 2014, title Testing chameleon gravity with the Coma cluster , JCAP, 04, 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/013

    2014 doi

  90. [99]

    W., Famaey , B., & Zhao , H

    Tiret , O., Combes , F., Angus , G. W., Famaey , B., & Zhao , H. S. 2007, title Velocity dispersion around ellipticals in MOND , , 476, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078569

    2007 doi

  91. [100]

    2009, title Chameleon scalar fields in relativistic gravitational backgrounds , JCAP, 05, 020, 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/020

    Tsujikawa, S., Tamaki, T., & Tavakol, R. 2009, title Chameleon scalar fields in relativistic gravitational backgrounds , JCAP, 05, 020, 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/020

    2009 doi

  92. [101]

    2016, title CLASH: Joint Analysis of Strong-Lensing, Weak-Lensing Shear and Magnification Data for 20 Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys

    Umetsu, K., Zitrin, A., Gruen, D., et al. 2016, title CLASH: Joint Analysis of Strong-Lensing, Weak-Lensing Shear and Magnification Data for 20 Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys. J., 821, 116, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/116

    2016 doi

  93. [102]

    1993, title Velocity Fields and Alignments of Clusters in Gravitational Instability Scenarios , , 418, 544, 10.1086/173416

    van Haarlem , M., & van de Weygaert , R. 1993, title Velocity Fields and Alignments of Clusters in Gravitational Instability Scenarios , , 418, 544, 10.1086/173416

    1993 doi

  94. [103]

    2015, title The XMM Cluster Survey: Testing chameleon gravity using the profiles of clusters , Mon

    Wilcox, H., et al. 2015, title The XMM Cluster Survey: Testing chameleon gravity using the profiles of clusters , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 452, 1171, 10.1093/mnras/stv1366

    2015 doi

  95. [104]

    2024, title Gravitational lensing from clusters of galaxies to test disformal couplings theories , Eur

    Zamani, S., Salzano, V., & Bettoni, D. 2024, title Gravitational lensing from clusters of galaxies to test disformal couplings theories , Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 618, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13000-4

    2024 doi

  96. [105]

    2025, title Nonminimally coupled dark matter in clusters of galaxies: a fully comprehensive analysis , Eur

    Zamani, S., Salzano, V., & Bettoni, D. 2025, title Nonminimally coupled dark matter in clusters of galaxies: a fully comprehensive analysis , Eur. Phys. J. C, 85, 263, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13956-x

    2025 doi

  97. [106]

    2022, title Cosmic acceleration and geodesic deviation in chameleon scalar field model , Eur

    Zaregonbadi, R., Saba, N., & Farhoudi, M. 2022, title Cosmic acceleration and geodesic deviation in chameleon scalar field model , Eur. Phys. J. C, 82, 730, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10646-w

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.