Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 203 references

Development of Exotic Harmonium Model to Investigate Electron-Positively Charged Particle Correlation in Two-Component Quantum Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-parameter variational wave function reproduces ground-state energies of an electron–positive-particle harmonic trap to within 0.03%, supplying exact benchmarks for two-component density functional theory.

desk verdict Solid variational toy model for electron–PCP correlation, but the 'exact benchmark' claim overreaches: total energies are within 0.03% of FEM while correlation energies, the quantity actually used to judge functionals, can be off by ~26%. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18118 v1 pith:BUQ2IKSW submitted 2025-04-25 physics.chem-ph

Nahid Sadat Riyahi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords ExoticHarmoniumelectron-positiveparticlecorrelationtwo-componentdensityfunctionaltheoryvariationalwavefunctionhillnon-Born-OppenheimerharmonicoscillatortrapKohn-Shaminversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a toy model, Exotic Harmonium, in which one electron and one positively charged particle interact by Coulomb attraction while both are confined in harmonic oscillator traps with a common frequency. It argues that standard power-series methods that solve the original harmonium model only reach excited states for this attractive, unequal-mass system, so the ground state must be approached variationally. The variational wave function, built from a Slater-type and Gaussian term in the inter-particle distance times the exact center-of-mass Gaussian, matches finite-element energies to within about 0.03% for all 90 systems studied, covering ten particle masses from positron to proton and nine oscillator frequencies. From this wave function the paper derives closed-form densities, pair functions, correlation hills, mean inter-particle distances, and a fitted analytical form of the wave function in terms of oscillator frequency and particle mass. If correct, the model provides a reference laboratory for testing and improving electron–positively charged particle correlation functionals in two-component density functional theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a two-parameter variational wave function that interpolates between the two limits of the model: $\exp(-\mu r)$ behaviour at low oscillator frequency (hydrogen-atom limit) and $\exp(-\frac{1}{2}\mu\omega r^2)$ behaviour at high frequency (harmonic-oscillator limit). Written as $\Psi = N \exp(-\alpha r - \beta r^2 - \gamma R^2)$, it separates after a coordinate transformation into a known center-of-mass Gaussian and a relative-motion component. This single ansatz carries the whole paper: all energy components, densities, pair distribution functions, and the fitted parameter formula are obtained from its closed-form integrals.

What would settle it

An independent high-accuracy numerical solution of the relative-motion Schrödinger equation for the hardest cases—for instance a positron mass with $\omega = 10^4$ or a proton mass with $\omega = 10^{-1}$—would settle the claim: if the variational energy falls below the finite-element energy for any of the 90 systems, the optimization is invalid; if a deviation above 0.03% appears at intermediate frequencies where neither asymptotic limit applies, the two-parameter ansatz is not sufficiently flexible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the ground state of the Exotic Harmonium Hamiltonian is faithfully represented by the two-parameter wave function $\Psi = N \exp(-\alpha r - \beta r^2 - \gamma R^2)$, where $r$ is the inter-particle distance, $R$ the center-of-mass coordinate, and $\gamma = M\omega/2$ fixed by the total mass and trap frequency. Only $\alpha$ and $\beta$ need variational optimization. The variational energies agree with finite-element reference values to about 0.03% in the worst case across the entire grid of ten masses and nine frequencies, while the wave function also satisfies the Kato cusp condition in the form $\alpha \approx \mu$, the reduced mass. The paper uses this accurate wave function to compute single-particle densities, two-particle distribution functions, correlation hills, and mean inter-particle distances in closed form, and then applies these quantities to benchmark five existing electron–positively charged particle correlation functionals within two-component density functional theory. A regression of the optimized parameters produces a compact analytical expression for the wave function that depends explicitly on the oscillator frequency and the positively charged particle mass.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark of the five correlation functionals assumes that each of the model's single-particle densities can be reproduced by a fictitious system of two non-interacting particles, and that the inversion of the Kohn-Sham equations is unique for every mass and frequency in the grid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each of the 90 systems provides a ready benchmark: any two-component density functional or multi-component wavefunction method can be tested against the variational energies without repeating finite-element calculations.
  • The fitted analytical form of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ as functions of oscillator frequency and positive-particle mass lets future users reconstruct an accurate ground-state wave function for this model directly, without re-optimizing parameters.
  • The correlation hill, the positive analogue of the correlation hole, gives a diagnostic picture of electron–positive-particle correlation that differs qualitatively from electron–electron correlation, and can guide the design of new correlation functionals.
  • Because the model spans the adiabatic and strongly correlated regimes as the mass ratio and frequency are varied, it can map where non-adiabatic and correlation energy contributions become comparable for exotic atoms such as positronium and muonium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The closed-form correlation hills and pair functions could be used as training data for a machine-learned electron–positive-particle correlation functional, something the paper does not itself pursue.
  • The benchmark comparison hints that any e-PCP functional depending only on the product of single-particle densities will miss the mass-ratio dependence of the correlation hill; a direct test would hold densities fixed while changing the mass ratio.
  • The failure of the power-series construction for attractive unequal masses suggests that exact solvability of trapped two-particle systems is tied to a sign-symmetry that is absent here, so a symmetry classification of such traps could predict when analytical ground states exist.
  • Extending the ansatz to excited states by multiplying with a factor $r^l$ would give a comparable benchmark for vibrationally or rotationally excited states of the model, which the paper does not address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This thesis-style manuscript develops the 'Exotic Harmonium Model' (EHM), a two-component system composed of one electron and one positively charged particle (PCP) of mass m (1 ≤ m ≤ 1836) confined by a common harmonic-oscillator trap of frequency ω (10^-4 ≤ ω ≤ 10^4 a.u.) with attractive Coulomb interaction. The central methodological claim is that a two-parameter variational wave function of the form Ψ = N exp(-αr - βr² - γR²), where r and R are the relative and center-of-mass coordinates, reproduces the finite-element (FEM) ground-state total energy to within about 0.03% for all 90 mass/frequency combinations considered. The manuscript further extends the harmonium correlation toolbox — correlation hill, two-particle distribution functions, Kato cusp condition — to the e-PCP case, and uses the variational densities and pair functions in a Kohn-Sham inversion (Section 5.2.2) to assess five existing e-PCP correlation functionals, with the stated aim of providing 'exact benchmarks' for e-PCP correlation. A regression analysis (Section 5.3) is claimed to yield a compact analytical form for α(ω,m) and β(ω,m). The numerical tables provide extensive data on variational parameters, total and component energies, and MC-HF comparisons.

Significance. If the benchmark claim were fully substantiated, the EHM would provide a useful test bed for two-component DFT correlation functionals, complementing existing harmonium models for electron-electron correlation. The strength of the manuscript is the clean separation of center-of-mass and relative motion, the explicit analytical integrals for energy components and single-particle densities, the systematic scan over 90 systems, and the numerical validation of total energies against FEM. The variational derivation itself is standard and the reported total-energy agreement is impressive. However, the added value for the DFT community hinges on the accuracy of correlation energies and densities, not total energies; the manuscript currently does not demonstrate that accuracy, so the significance of the functional assessment remains prospective.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2.2, Eq. (3-29), Table 4-3] The abstract and Section 1.8 claim that the EHM provides 'exact benchmarks' for e-PCP correlation functionals. The benchmark quantities, however, are correlation energies defined as small differences between total energies (Eq. 3-29 and the VAR-HF/FEM-HF columns of Table 4-3). The reported total-energy accuracy of ≤0.03% does not translate into accurate correlation energies: for m=1836 and ω=1, the variational and FEM total energies differ by 0.000236 a.u., whereas the FEM-HF correlation energy is only -0.000921 a.u.; the variational correlation energy therefore deviates from the FEM-HF value by roughly 26%. Because the Kohn-Sham inversion of Section 5.2.2 uses the variational single-particle densities and the pair function (via Eq. 2-115) as input, the extracted T_e^c, T_p^c, and W_c inherit errors of this size, and the ranking of the five tested functionals is not reliably established. The manuscript provides no direct comparison of the variational densities or pair functions with FEM-based counterparts; such a validation, plus a reporting of the correlation-energy components with error bars, is required before the 'exact benchmark' claim can be sustained. The v-representability of the densities is not the limiting issue here, because with one electron and one PCP any positive density yields a unique KS orbital φ=√ρ; the relevant uncertainty is the accuracy of the variational density itself.
  2. [§5.3] The regression of the variational parameters α and β against ω and m is presented as a key deliverable ('compact yet precise analytical form'), but the provided text contains no diagnostics for the fit: the functional form, the number of fitted coefficients, the R² values, the maximum relative errors in α and β, and the error that the fitted parameters introduce into the variational energy are all absent. Without these, the claim of precision cannot be checked, and the fitted wave function cannot be used reliably by others. The fit should be reported together with a table comparing optimized and fitted parameters for all 90 systems and the resulting energy errors, including the correlation-energy error metric from the preceding comment.
  3. [§3.3.7, Eq. (3-61), Table 4-2] The text states that the Kato cusp condition (∂Ψ/∂r)|_{r=0} = -μ Ψ(0) is 'largely valid' because α≈μ. Table 4-2 shows that at low frequencies the optimized α approaches μ (e.g., α=0.999456 for m=1836 at ω=10^-4), but at high frequencies α falls to 0.4046 for m=1 at ω=10^4 (μ=0.5), a 19% deviation from the cusp value; similar deviations occur for all masses. Since the cusp condition controls the small-r behavior of the wave function and hence the pair function at short distances, the effect of this deviation on the correlation energy components and on the functional assessment should be quantified. At minimum, the claim 'largely valid' should be replaced by a quantitative statement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] The paragraph describing the computational methods appears twice, once with 'three methods' and once with 'four methods'; this duplication is an editing oversight and should be resolved.
  2. [§1.3.2] The text refers to 'expansion (5-1)' when it means equation (1-5); several similar cross-reference inconsistencies appear throughout the manuscript and should be corrected in a careful proofread.
  3. [Abstract and §1.8] The abbreviation 'e-PCP' is used before 'PCP' is defined; define the term at first occurrence in the abstract or in Section 1.5.
  4. [Eq. (2-168)] The long density expression appears to have unbalanced parentheses, making it difficult to verify; check the transcription against the derivation.
  5. [§4.3, Eq. (4-7)] The virial ratio is defined as 2⟨T⟩/⟨r·∇V⟩ in Eq. (4-7), but the text states that for HF the ratio is reported as −⟨V⟩/⟨T⟩; clarify which definition is used in Table 4-4, since the two differ for a harmonic-oscillator potential.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: variational parameters are optimized against the EHM Hamiltonian, FEM is an independent reference, and the DFT correlation benchmarks are derived quantities rather than fitted targets.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The variational parameters α and β in the trial wave function (Eq. 2-72) are obtained by minimizing the expectation value of the EHM Hamiltonian (Eqs. 2-76 to 2-80), not by fitting to the FEM energies; FEM appears only as an independent numerical reference, and the reported 0.03% total-energy error is a validation, not an input. The DFT correlation benchmark E_epc in Eq. (3-29) is constructed from the variational wave function's densities, kinetic energies, and the KS inversion of those densities; no visible equation feeds any of the five tested functionals back into this construction, so the comparison is not circular by construction. The Section 5.3 regression fits α(m,ω) and β(m,ω) to optimized variational parameters as a compact analytical representation; if this fitted form is later used to regenerate energies, that is interpolation of a fitted representation, not a prediction from a target quantity, and the energies themselves were not the regression targets. The correlation-hill sum rule and the Kato-condition check are mathematical identities and consistency checks rather than circular predictions. The only self-citation candidate, ref. [73] for an electron-positron correlation functional, is cited as an object of assessment or motivation, not as the justification for the EHM results; no load-bearing reduction through that citation is exhibited in the visible text. The known accuracy caveat—that the 0.03% total-energy error can translate into a much larger relative error in the small correlation-energy difference—is a numerical-accuracy limitation, not a circularity, and therefore does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two optimized variational parameters per system (90 systems), plus regression coefficients in Section 5.3. No new physical entities are postulated. The main domain assumptions are the harmonic-trap Hamiltonian and the two-parameter trial form.

free parameters (3)
  • α (variational Slater exponent) = varies by system; see Table 4-2 (e.g., 0.5000 to 0.4046 for m=1 as ω goes from 1e-4 to 1e4)
    Optimized by the variational principle for each mass and frequency; central to the trial wave function.
  • β (variational Gaussian exponent) = varies by system; see Table 4-2 (e.g., 0 to 2495.89 for m=1)
    Optimized by the variational principle for each mass and frequency.
  • Regression coefficients in α(ω,m) and β(ω,m) = not visible in truncated text (Section 5.3)
    Used to produce the compact analytical form for the wave function claimed in the abstract; the actual coefficients are not available in the reviewed portion.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Variational theorem: the optimized expectation value of the Hamiltonian is an upper bound to the exact ground-state energy.
    Invoked in Section 2.3.4 to justify the energy minimization.
  • standard math Separability of center-of-mass and relative motion when the harmonic trap force constants are proportional to particle masses (condition k1/k2 = m1/m2).
    Derived in Section 2.2.1; the EHM Hamiltonian is built to satisfy this condition.
  • domain assumption The Hamiltonian Eq. (2-69) with a common oscillator frequency and mass-proportional force constants is an adequate toy model for e-PCP correlation in non-BO systems.
    This is the central modeling choice, motivated in Chapter 1 but not derived from a more fundamental theory.
  • domain assumption The two-parameter trial form χ ~ e^{-αr-βr²} spans the exact ground state in the low-ω (hydrogenic) and high-ω (harmonic) limits and is sufficiently accurate at intermediate frequencies.
    The accuracy is verified numerically against FEM for a discrete grid of 90 systems, but no rigorous error bound is provided for intermediate frequencies.
  • domain assumption The EHM single-particle densities are non-interacting v-representable, enabling Kohn-Sham inversion in Section 5.2.2.
    Required for the functional benchmarks; not discussed in the visible sections of the thesis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Development of Exotic Harmonium Model to Investigate Electron-Positively Charged Particle Correlation in Two-Component Quantum Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BUQ2IKSW

@misc{pith2026250418118,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Development of Exotic Harmonium Model to Investigate Electron-Positively Charged Particle Correlation in Two-Component Quantum Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BUQ2IKSW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18118}
}
read the original abstract

The problem of calculating the electron-positively charged particle correlation energy poses a challenge in the field of quantum chemistry beyond the adiabatic approximation. In this study, a toy model called Exotic Harmonium is developed to enhance our understanding of this type of correlation. Since the analytical methods to solve the eigenvalue equation for Exotic Harmonium lead to the excited rather than the ground state of the system, we employ the variation method in this study to obtain an approximate ground state wave function. By considering the asymptotic behavior of the wave function, we derive a compact but highly accurate variational wave function. Using this wave function, we are able to determine various properties of the system, including energy and its components, as well as single-particle densities. Additionally, we extend key concepts and quantities specifically tailored to study electron correlation in the Harmonium model to the Exotic Harmonium model. For instance, the "correlation hill" concept effectively highlights the distinct nature of electron-positively charged particle correlation compared to electron-electron correlation. Furthermore, we utilize Exotic Harmonium to assess the accuracy of five electron-positively charged particle correlation functionals developed within the context of the two-component density functional theory. Through a regression process, we obtained a compact yet precise analytical form for wave function which explicitly depends on the two crucial variables: oscillator field frequency and positively charged particle mass. This analytical form provides valuable insights into the behavior of the system. Also, the Exotic Harmonium model enables the investigation of electron-positively charged particle correlation in a vast range of particle masses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Number of Gaussian terms used in the fitting process

  2. [2]

    Power, where 1 means single-particle density and 0.5 means Kohn-Sham orbitals

  3. [3]

    Range of r used in the fitting process

  4. [4]

    Integral overlap values between the exact quantity and the fitted quantity

  5. [5]

    Percentage error of the fitted points relative to the original density points for the first 10 points with the highest error 340 Table C-3: Gaussian functions resulting from fitting electronic densities and Kohn-Sham orbitals in TC-DFT calculations 1836 207 quantity/mp 0.0202244 𝑒−10.2106re2 + 0.262169𝑒−3.94531re2 − 0.207595𝑒−3.91606re2 + 0.0675395𝑒−1.584...

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Parameter α alpha using logistic function

  7. [7]

    Parameter α alpha using error function Quantities/ ω 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 b parameter OPT b 0.000000 0.000002 0.000150 0.013167 0.369653 4.614414 48.799286 496.055715 4985.705219 SIM b 0.000050 0.000500 0.004997 0.049973 0.499728 4.997278 49.972782 499.727817 4997.278171 SIM 2 b 0.000949 0.002661 0.004997 0.018367 0.399782 4.681223 48...

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Error percentage of parameter α alpha using logistic function

Show all 203 references
  1. [9]

    Error percentage of parameter α using error function

  2. [10]

    Optimized variational parameter β

  3. [11]

    Parameter β using simple form 1

  4. [12]

    Parameter β using simple form 2

  5. [13]

    Parameter β using exponential function

  6. [14]

    Error percentage of parameter β using simple form 1

  7. [15]

    Error percentage of parameter β using simple form 2

  8. [16]

    Error percentage of parameter β using exponential function

  9. [17]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using optimized parameters

  10. [18]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 2 and 7

  11. [19]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 3 and 7

  12. [20]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 2 and 9

  13. [21]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 3 and 9

  14. [22]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 2 and 8

  15. [23]

    Variational energy of relative motion Hamiltonian using parameters from items 3 and 8

  16. [24]

    Error percentage for item 14

  17. [25]

    Error percentage for item 15

  18. [26]

    Error percentage for item 16

  19. [27]

    Error percentage for item 17

  20. [28]

    Error percentage for item 18

  21. [29]

    Error percentage for item 19 354 355 10 References

  22. [30]

    Mathematical physics in theoretical chemistry: A volume in developments in physical & theoretical chemistry,

    S. M. Blinder and J. E. House, “Mathematical physics in theoretical chemistry: A volume in developments in physical & theoretical chemistry,” Math. Phys. Theor. Chem. , pp. 1 –408, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/C2016-0-04521-7

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Leszczynski, Handbook of computational chemistry

    J. Leszczynski, Handbook of computational chemistry. Springer, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Atkins’ Physical Chemistry, 8th Ed.; Oxford University Press,

    P. W. Atkins and J. De Paula, “Atkins’ Physical Chemistry, 8th Ed.; Oxford University Press,” 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Электронная библиотека БГУ: On the Quantum Theory of Molecules

    “Электронная библиотека БГУ: On the Quantum Theory of Molecules.” [Online]. Available: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/154381. [Accessed: 21 -May- 2022]

    2022

  26. [34]

    Beweis des Adiabatensatzes,

    M. Born and V. Fock, “Beweis des Adiabatensatzes,” Zeitschrift für 356 Phys. 1928 513 , vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 165 –180, Mar. 1928, doi: 10.1007/BF01343193

    1928 doi

  27. [35]

    Piela, Ideas of Quantum Chemistry

    L. Piela, Ideas of Quantum Chemistry. Elsevier, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    D. J. (David J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to quantum mechanics, 3rd editio. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Atkins and R

    P. Atkins and R. Friedman, Molecular Quantum Mechanics , 5th Edition, Oxford University Press, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    Wiley, 2017

    Jensen Frank, Introduction to Computational Chemistry , 3rd Edition. Wiley, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Chemistry without the Born – Oppenheimer approximation,

    F. Agostini and B. F. E. Curchod, “Chemistry without the Born – Oppenheimer approximation,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. , vol. 380, no. 2223, May 2022, doi: 10.1098/RSTA.2020.0375

    2022

  32. [40]

    Born and K

    M. Born and K. Huang, Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices , New Ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954

    1954

  33. [41]

    How large are nonadiabatic effects in atomic and diatomic systems?,

    Y. Yang, I. Kylänpää, N. M. Tubman, J. T. Krogel, S. Hammes - Schiffer, and D. M. Ceperley, “How large are nonadiabatic effects in atomic and diatomic systems?,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 143, no. 12, p. 124308, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4931667

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    Equivalent Quantum Approach to Nuclei and Electrons in Molecules,

    P. M. Kozlowski and L. Adamowicz, “Equivalent Quantum Approach to Nuclei and Electrons in Molecules,” Chem. Rev., vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 2007–2022, 1993, doi: 10.1021/cr00022a003

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    Current theoretical challenges in proton - coupled electron transfer: Electron -proton nonadiabaticity, proton relays, and ultrafast dynamics,

    S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Current theoretical challenges in proton - coupled electron transfer: Electron -proton nonadiabaticity, proton relays, and ultrafast dynamics,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1410–1416, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1021/jz200277p

    2011 doi

  36. [44]

    Electrochemical proton - coupled electron transfer: Beyond the golden rule,

    I. Navrotskaya and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Electrochemical proton - coupled electron transfer: Beyond the golden rule,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 131, no. 2, p. 024112, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1063/1.3158828

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    The any particle molecular 357 orbital approach: A short review of the theory and applications,

    A. Reyes, F. Moncada, and J. Charry, “The any particle molecular 357 orbital approach: A short review of the theory and applications,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 119, no. 2, p. e25705, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/qua.25705

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    Non -Born-Oppenheimer calculations of atoms and molecules,

    M. Cafiero, S. Bubin, and L. Adamowicz, “Non -Born-Oppenheimer calculations of atoms and molecules,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1491–1501, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1039/b211193d

    2003 doi

  39. [47]

    Exotic atoms,

    J. Hartmann, “Exotic atoms,” Access Sci., 2000, doi: 10.1036/1097 - 8542.YB000560

    2000 doi

  40. [48]

    Nagamine, Introductory Muon Science

    K. Nagamine, Introductory Muon Science . Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  41. [49]

    F. R. Attila Vertes, Sandor Nagy, Zoltan Klencsar, Rezso G. Lovas, Ed., Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry. Springer US, 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    Muonium - The second radioisotope of hydrogen - And its contribution to free radical chemistry,

    C. J. Rhodes, “Muonium - The second radioisotope of hydrogen - And its contribution to free radical chemistry,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, no. 8, pp. 1379–1396, 2002, doi: 10.1039/b100699l

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    The positive muon and μsR spectroscopy: Powerful tools for investigating the structure and dynamics of free radicals and spin probes in complex systems,

    I. McKenzie, “The positive muon and μsR spectroscopy: Powerful tools for investigating the structure and dynamics of free radicals and spin probes in complex systems,” Annu. Reports Prog. Chem. - Sect. C, vol. 109, pp. 65–112, 2013, doi: 10.1039/c3pc90005c

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Muonium states in semiconductors,

    B. D. Patterson, “Muonium states in semiconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 69 –159, 1988, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.60.69

    1988 doi

  45. [53]

    Low-energy positron interactions with atoms and molecules,

    C. M. Surko, G. F. Gribakin, and S. J. Buckman, “Low-energy positron interactions with atoms and molecules,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 38, no. 6, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/38/6/R01

    2005 doi

  46. [54]

    Theory of positrons,

    M. J. Puska and R. M. Nieminen, “Theory of positrons,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 841–897, 1994

    1994

  47. [55]

    Defect identification in semiconductors with positron annihilation: Experiment and theory,

    F. Tuomisto and I. Makkonen, “Defect identification in semiconductors with positron annihilation: Experiment and theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1583 –1631, 2013, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1583. 358

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    D. L. Bailey and D. W. Townsend, Positron Emission Tomography: Basic Sciences. Springer, 2006

    2006

  49. [57]

    Positronium Physics and Biomedical Applications,

    S. D. Bass, S. Mariazzi, P. Moskal, and E. Stepien, “Positronium Physics and Biomedical Applications,” vol. 95, no. June, pp. 1 –21, 2023, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.021002

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    Proof-of-Principle Experiment for Testing Strong- Field Quantum Electrodynamics with Exotic Atoms : High Precision X-Ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Neon,

    T. Okumura et al., “Proof-of-Principle Experiment for Testing Strong- Field Quantum Electrodynamics with Exotic Atoms : High Precision X-Ray Spectroscopy of Muonic Neon,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 130, no. 17, p. 173001, 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.173001

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    J. S. Rigden, Hydrogen: The Essential Element . Harvard University Press, 2003

    2003

  52. [60]

    Recent results of laser spectroscopy experiments of pionic helium atoms at PSI,

    M. Hori, H. Aghai-Khozani, A. Sótér, A. Dax, and D. Barna, “Recent results of laser spectroscopy experiments of pionic helium atoms at PSI,” SciPost Phys. Proc. , vol. 5, no. 5, p. 026, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.21468/SCIPOSTPHYSPROC.5.026

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Proposed method for laser spectroscopy of pionic helium atoms to determine the charged -pion mass,

    M. Hori, A. Sótér, and V. I. Korobov, “Proposed method for laser spectroscopy of pionic helium atoms to determine the charged -pion mass,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. , vol. 89, no. 4, p. 042515, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVA.89.042515/FIGURES/11/MEDIUM

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    Solving the Dirac equation in central potential for muonic hydrogen atom with point-like nucleus,

    E. D. Kena and G. B. Adera, “Solving the Dirac equation in central potential for muonic hydrogen atom with point-like nucleus,” J. Phys. Commun., vol. 5, no. 10, p. 105018, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1088/2399 - 6528/AC2FBC

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    Laser spectroscopy of pionic helium atoms,

    M. Hori, H. Aghai -Khozani, A. Sótér, A. Dax, and D. Barna, “Laser spectroscopy of pionic helium atoms,” Nature, vol. 581, no. 7806, pp. 37–41, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/S41586-020-2240-X

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    Precision spectroscopy of light exotic atoms,

    D. Gotta, “Precision spectroscopy of light exotic atoms,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 133 –195, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2003.09.003

    2004 doi

  57. [65]

    The electron and 359 nuclear orbitals model: Current challenges and future prospects,

    A. D. Bochevarov, E. F. Valeev, and C. D. Sherrill, “The electron and 359 nuclear orbitals model: Current challenges and future prospects,” Mol. Phys., vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 111 –123, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1080/00268970410001668525

    2004 doi

  58. [67]

    Protonic structure of molecules. II. Methodology, center -of-mass transformation, and the structure of methane, ammonia, and water,

    I. L. Thomas and H. W. Joy, “Protonic structure of molecules. II. Methodology, center -of-mass transformation, and the structure of methane, ammonia, and water,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1200– 1208, Oct. 1970, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.1200

    1970 doi

  59. [68]

    Protonic structure of molecules. I. Ammonia molecules,

    I. L. Thomas, “Protonic structure of molecules. I. Ammonia molecules,” Phys. Rev. , vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 90 –94, 1969, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.185.90

    1969 doi

  60. [69]

    An effective method for generating nonadiabatic many -body wave function using explicitly correlated Gaussian-type functions,

    P. M. Kozlowski and L. Adamowicz, “An effective method for generating nonadiabatic many -body wave function using explicitly correlated Gaussian-type functions,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 6661–6668, 1991, doi: 10.1063/1.461538

    1991 doi

  61. [70]

    Born-oppenheimer and non -born-oppenheimer, atomic and molecular calculations with explicitly correlated gaussians,

    S. Bubin, M. Pavanello, W. C. Tung, K. L. Sharkey, and L. Adamowicz, “Born-oppenheimer and non -born-oppenheimer, atomic and molecular calculations with explicitly correlated gaussians,” Chem. Rev., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 36–79, 2013, doi: 10.1021/cr200419d

    2013 doi

  62. [71]

    Variational calculations of excited states with zero total angular momentum (vibrational spectrum) of H2 without use the Born -Oppenheimer approximation,

    S. Bubin and L. Adamowicz, “Variational calculations of excited states with zero total angular momentum (vibrational spectrum) of H2 without use the Born -Oppenheimer approximation,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 3079–3082, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1063/1.1537719

    2003 doi

  63. [72]

    Non -Born-Oppenheimer molecular structure and one -particle densities for H2D+,

    M. Cafiero and L. Adamowicz, “Non -Born-Oppenheimer molecular structure and one -particle densities for H2D+,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 122, no. 18, p. 184305, 2005, doi: 10.1063/1.1891707

    2005 doi

  64. [73]

    Nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory: Simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions without Born– Oppenheimer approximation,

    H. Nakai, “Nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory: Simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions without Born– Oppenheimer approximation,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 107, no. 360 14, pp. 2849–2869, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1002/qua.21379

    2007 doi

  65. [75]

    An extension of ab initio molecular orbital theory to nuclear motion,

    M. Tachikawa, K. Mori, H. Nakai, and K. Iguchi, “An extension of ab initio molecular orbital theory to nuclear motion,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 290, no. 4 –6, pp. 437 –442, Jul. 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0009 - 2614(98)00519-3

    1998 doi

  66. [76]

    Simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions without Born -Oppenheimer approximation: Ab initio NO+MO/HF theory,

    H. Nakai, “Simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions without Born -Oppenheimer approximation: Ab initio NO+MO/HF theory,” Int. J. Quantum Chem., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 511– 517, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1002/qua.1106

    2002 doi

  67. [77]

    Many -body effects in nonadiabatic molecular theory for simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions: Ab initio NOMO/MBPT and CC methods,

    H. Nakai and K. Sodeyama, “Many -body effects in nonadiabatic molecular theory for simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions: Ab initio NOMO/MBPT and CC methods,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 1119 –1127, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1063/1.1528951

    2003 doi

  68. [78]

    Elimination of translational and rotational motions in nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory,

    H. Nakai, M. Hoshino, K. Miyamoto, and S. Hyodo, “Elimination of translational and rotational motions in nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 122, no. 16, p. 164101, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1063/1.1871914

    2005 doi

  69. [79]

    The idea of a potential energy surface,

    B. T. Sutcliffe, “The idea of a potential energy surface,” J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM, vol. 341, no. 1 –3, pp. 217 –235, Oct. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0166-1280(95)04125-P

    1995 doi

  70. [80]

    Elimination of translational and rotational motions in nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory: Application of Møller-Plesset perturbation theory,

    M. Hoshino and H. Nakai, “Elimination of translational and rotational motions in nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory: Application of Møller-Plesset perturbation theory,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 124, no. 19, p. 194110, May 2006, doi: 10.1063/1.2193513

    2006 doi

  71. [81]

    Evaluation of electron repulsion integral of the explicitly correlated Gaussian - 361 nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory,

    H. Nishizawa, M. Hoshino, Y. Imamura, and H. Nakai, “Evaluation of electron repulsion integral of the explicitly correlated Gaussian - 361 nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital theory,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 521, pp. 142–149, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.023

    2012 doi

  72. [82]

    Multiconfigurational nuclear -electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations,

    S. P. Webb, T. Iordanov, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multiconfigurational nuclear -electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 4106 –4118, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1063/1.1494980

    2002 doi

  73. [83]

    Electron-Proton Correlation for Hydrogen Tunneling Systems,

    M. V. Pak and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Electron-Proton Correlation for Hydrogen Tunneling Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 92, no. 10, p. 103002, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.92.103002/FIGURES/2/MEDIUM

    2004 doi

  74. [84]

    Explicit dynamical electron -proton correlation in the nuclear - electronic orbital framework,

    C. Swalina, M. V. Pak, A. Chakraborty, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Explicit dynamical electron -proton correlation in the nuclear - electronic orbital framework,” J. Phys. Chem. A, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 9983–9987, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1021/jp0634297

    2006 doi

  75. [85]

    Inclusion of explicit electron -proton correlation in the nuclear -electronic orbital approach using Gaussian-type geminal functions,

    A. Chakraborty, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Inclusion of explicit electron -proton correlation in the nuclear -electronic orbital approach using Gaussian-type geminal functions,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 129, no. 1, p. 014101, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2943144

    2008 doi

  76. [86]

    Alternative wavefunction ansatz for including explicit electron-proton correlation in the nuclear-electronic orbital approach,

    C. Ko, M. V. Pak, C. Swalina, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Alternative wavefunction ansatz for including explicit electron-proton correlation in the nuclear-electronic orbital approach,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 135, no. 5, p. 054106, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1063/1.3611054

    2011 doi

  77. [87]

    Reduced explicitly correlated Hartree -Fock approach within the nuclear-electronic orbital framework: Theoretical formulation,

    A. Sirjoosingh, M. V. Pak, C. Swalina, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Reduced explicitly correlated Hartree -Fock approach within the nuclear-electronic orbital framework: Theoretical formulation,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 139, no. 3, p. 034102, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4812257

    2013 doi

  78. [88]

    Nuclear-electronic orbital reduced explicitly correlated Hartree-Fock approach: Restricted basis sets and open -shell systems,

    K. R. Brorsen, A. Sirjoosingh, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Nuclear-electronic orbital reduced explicitly correlated Hartree-Fock approach: Restricted basis sets and open -shell systems,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 142, no. 21, p. 214108, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4921304. 362

    2015 doi

  79. [89]

    Multicomponent Quantum Chemistry: Integrating Electronic and Nuclear Quantum Effects via the Nuclear -Electronic Orbital Method,

    F. Pavošević, T. Culpitt, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multicomponent Quantum Chemistry: Integrating Electronic and Nuclear Quantum Effects via the Nuclear -Electronic Orbital Method,” Chem. Rev., vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 4222–4253, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00798

    2020 doi

  80. [90]

    Nuclear -electronic orbital methods: Foundations and prospects,

    S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Nuclear -electronic orbital methods: Foundations and prospects,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0053576

    2021 doi

  81. [91]

    NonBorn – Oppenheimer density functional theory of molecular systems Non - Born-Oppenheimer density functional theory of molecular systems,

    J. F. Capitani, R. F. Nalewajski, and R. G. Parr, “NonBorn – Oppenheimer density functional theory of molecular systems Non - Born-Oppenheimer density functional theory of molecular systems,” J. Chem. Phys., no. 76, p. 568, 1982, doi: 10.1063/1.442703

    1982 doi

  82. [92]

    Density functional theory without the Born – Oppenheimer approximation and its application,

    Y. Shigeta, H. Takahashi, S. Yamanaka, M. Mitani, H. Nagao, and K. Yamaguchi, “Density functional theory without the Born – Oppenheimer approximation and its application,” Int. J. Quantum Chem., vol. 70, no. 45, pp. 659 –669, 1998, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097 - 461x(1998)70:4/5<65...

    1998 doi

  83. [93]

    Multicomponent density -functional theory for electrons and nuclei,

    T. Kreibich and E. K. U. Gross, “Multicomponent density -functional theory for electrons and nuclei,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 86, no. 14, pp. 2984–2987, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2984

    2001 doi

  84. [94]

    Density functional theory treatment of electron correlation in the nuclear - electronic orbital approach,

    M. V. Pak, A. Chakraborty, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Density functional theory treatment of electron correlation in the nuclear - electronic orbital approach,” J. Phys. Chem. A , vol. 111, no. 20, pp. 4522–4526, 2007, doi: 10.1021/jp0704463

    2007 doi

  85. [95]

    Properties of the exact universal functional in multicomponent density functional theory,

    A. Chakraborty, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Properties of the exact universal functional in multicomponent density functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 131, no. 12, p. 124115, 2009, doi: 10.1063/1.3236844

    2009 doi

  86. [96]

    Derivation of an electron-proton correlation functional for multicomponent density functional theory within the nuclear -electronic orbital approach,

    A. Sirjoosingh, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, “Derivation of an electron-proton correlation functional for multicomponent density functional theory within the nuclear -electronic orbital approach,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 2689 –2693, Sep. 2011, doi: 10...

    2011 doi

  87. [97]

    Multicomponent density functional theory study of the interplay between electron - electron and electron-proton correlation,

    A. Sirjoosingh, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, “Multicomponent density functional theory study of the interplay between electron - electron and electron-proton correlation,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 136, no. 17, p. 174114, May 2012, doi: 10.1063/1.4709609

    2012 doi

  88. [98]

    Development of a practical multicomponent density functional for electron -proton correlation to produce accurate proton densities,

    Y. Yang, K. R. Brorsen, T. Culpitt, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes - Schiffer, “Development of a practical multicomponent density functional for electron -proton correlation to produce accurate proton densities,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 147, no. 11, p. 114113, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4996038

    2017 doi

  89. [99]

    Multicomponent Density Functional Theory: Impact of Nuclear Quantum Effects on Proton Affinities and Geometries,

    K. R. Brorsen, Y. Yang, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multicomponent Density Functional Theory: Impact of Nuclear Quantum Effects on Proton Affinities and Geometries,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 3488–3493, 2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01442

    2017 doi

  90. [100]

    Alternative forms and transferability of electron -proton correlation functionals in nuclear-electronic orbital density functional theory,

    K. R. Brorsen, P. E. Schneider, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, “Alternative forms and transferability of electron -proton correlation functionals in nuclear-electronic orbital density functional theory,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 149, no. 4, p. 044110, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5037945

    2018 doi

  91. [101]

    Multicomponent density functional theory: Including the density gradient in the electron-proton correlation functional for hydrogen and deuterium,

    Z. Tao, Y. Yang, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multicomponent density functional theory: Including the density gradient in the electron-proton correlation functional for hydrogen and deuterium,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 151, no. 12, p. 124102, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5119124

    2019 doi

  92. [102]

    Two -component density functional theory for muonic molecules: Inclusion of the electron–positive muon correlation functional,

    M. Goli and S. Shahbazian, “Two -component density functional theory for muonic molecules: Inclusion of the electron–positive muon correlation functional,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 156, no. 4, p. 044104, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0077179

    2022 doi

  93. [103]

    Multicomponent Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles Theory within the Nuclear - Electronic Orbital Framework,

    F. Pavošević, T. Culpitt, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multicomponent Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles Theory within the Nuclear - Electronic Orbital Framework,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 338–347, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01120

    2019 doi

  94. [104]

    Alternative formulation of many -body perturbation theory for electron -proton correlation,

    C. Swalina, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Alternative formulation of many -body perturbation theory for electron -proton correlation,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 404, no. 4 –6, pp. 394–399, Mar. 364 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.115

    2005 doi

  95. [105]

    Multicomponent Orbital -Optimized Perturbation Theory Methods: Approaching Coupled Cluster Accuracy at Lower Cost,

    F. Pavošević, B. J. G. Rousseau, and S. Hammes -Schiffer, “Multicomponent Orbital -Optimized Perturbation Theory Methods: Approaching Coupled Cluster Accuracy at Lower Cost,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1578 –1583, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00090

    2020 doi

  96. [106]

    R. G. Parr and Y. Weitao, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Oxford University Press, 1989

    1989

  97. [107]

    Electronic Excited States in Extreme Limits via Ensemble Density Functionals,

    T. Gould, D. P. Kooi, P. Gori -Giorgi, and S. Pittalis, “Electronic Excited States in Extreme Limits via Ensemble Density Functionals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 130, no. 10, p. 106401, 2023, doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.106401

    2023 doi

  98. [108]

    Two electrons in an external oscillator potential: Particular analytic solutions of a Coulomb correlation problem,

    M. Taut, “Two electrons in an external oscillator potential: Particular analytic solutions of a Coulomb correlation problem,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 3561 –3566, Nov. 1993, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3561

    1993 doi

  99. [109]

    Study of Electron Correlation in Helium-Like Systems Using an Exactly Soluble Model,

    N. R. Kestner and O. Sinanoälu, “Study of Electron Correlation in Helium-Like Systems Using an Exactly Soluble Model,” Phys. Rev., vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 2687 –2692, Dec. 1962, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.128.2687

    1962 doi

  100. [110]

    Über den Grundzustand des Heliumatoms,

    E. A. Hylleraas, “Über den Grundzustand des Heliumatoms,” Zeitschrift für Phys. , vol. 48, no. 7 –8, pp. 469 –494, 1928, doi: 10.1007/BF01340013

    1928 doi

  101. [111]

    Neue Berechnung der Energie des Heliums im Grundzustande, sowie des tiefsten Terms von Ortho -Helium,

    E. A. Hylleraas, “Neue Berechnung der Energie des Heliums im Grundzustande, sowie des tiefsten Terms von Ortho -Helium,” Zeitschrift für Phys. , vol. 54, no. 5 –6, pp. 347 –366, 1929, doi: 10.1007/BF01375457

    1929 doi

  102. [112]

    Test of density -functional approximations in an exactly soluble model,

    P. M. Laufer and J. B. Krieger, “Test of density -functional approximations in an exactly soluble model,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1480–1491, Mar. 1986, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1480

    1986 doi

  103. [113]

    Study of correlation effects in an exactly 365 solvable model two‐electron system,

    S. K. Ghosh and A. Samanta, “Study of correlation effects in an exactly 365 solvable model two‐electron system,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 517–522, Aug. 1991, doi: 10.1063/1.460368

    1991 doi

  104. [114]

    Correlation in an exactly solvable two- particle quantum system,

    A. Samanta and S. K. Ghosh, “Correlation in an exactly solvable two- particle quantum system,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1178–1183, 1990, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.1178

    1990 doi

  105. [115]

    A. G. Ushveridze, Quasi-exactly solvable models in quantum mechanics. Taylor & Francis, 1994

    1994

  106. [116]

    Harmonium,

    J. Karwowski and L. Cyrnek, “Harmonium,” Ann. Phys., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 181–193, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1002/andp.200310071

    2004 doi

  107. [117]

    Influence of confinement on the properties of quantum systems,

    J. Karwowski, “Influence of confinement on the properties of quantum systems,” J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM, vol. 727, no. 1-3 SPEC. ISS., pp. 1–7, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.02.038

    2005 doi

  108. [118]

    Biconfluent Heun equation in quantum chemistry: Harmonium and related systems,

    J. Karwowski and H. A. Witek, “Biconfluent Heun equation in quantum chemistry: Harmonium and related systems,” Theor. Chem. Acc., vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 1 –11, May 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00214 -014- 1494-5

    2014 doi

  109. [119]

    Inverse problems in quantum chemistry,

    J. Karwowski, “Inverse problems in quantum chemistry,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 2456 –2463, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1002/qua.22048

    2009 doi

  110. [120]

    Few -particle systems: Quasi -exactly solvable models,

    J. Karwowski, “Few -particle systems: Quasi -exactly solvable models,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , vol. 104, no. 1, p. 12033, 2008, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/104/1/012033

    2008 doi

  111. [121]

    Schrödinger equations with power potentials,

    J. Karwowski and H. A. Witek, “Schrödinger equations with power potentials,” Mol. Phys., vol. 114, no. 7–8, pp. 932–940, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00268976.2015.1115565

    2016

  112. [122]

    Five - and six-electron harmonium atoms: Highly accurate electronic properties and their application to benchmarking of approximate 1 -matrix functionals,

    J. Cioslowski and K. Strasburger, “Five - and six-electron harmonium atoms: Highly accurate electronic properties and their application to benchmarking of approximate 1 -matrix functionals,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 148, no. 14, p. 144107, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5021419

    2018 doi

  113. [123]

    K. D. Sen, Electronic structure of quantum confined atoms and molecules. Springer, 2014. 366

    2014

  114. [124]

    Electronic structure and dynamics of confined atoms,

    P. C. Deshmukh, J. Jose, H. R. Varma, and S. T. Manson, “Electronic structure and dynamics of confined atoms,” Eur. Phys. J. D , vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1–32, 2021, doi: 10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00151-2

    2021 doi

  115. [125]

    Quantum dots in a magnetic field: Role of electron-electron interactions,

    P. A. Maksym and T. Chakraborty, “Quantum dots in a magnetic field: Role of electron-electron interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 108–111, 1990, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.108

    1990 doi

  116. [126]

    Electron correlation in the ground state of helium,

    C. A. Coulson and A. H. Neilson, “Electron correlation in the ground state of helium,” Proc. Phys. Soc., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 831 –837, 1961, doi: 10.1088/0370-1328/78/5/328

    1961 doi

  117. [127]

    Koch and M

    W. Koch and M. C. Holthausen, A Chemist’s Guide to Density Functional Theory. Wiley, 2001

    2001

  118. [128]

    Theory of Positron Annihilation in Solids,

    R. A. Ferrell, “Theory of Positron Annihilation in Solids,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 28, p. 308, 1956

    1956

  119. [129]

    Positron annihilation in metals,

    S. Kahana, “Positron annihilation in metals,” Phys. Rev., vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 123–128, 1960, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.117.123

    1960 doi

  120. [130]

    Effective mass of positrons in metals,

    D. R. Hamann, “Effective mass of positrons in metals,” Phys. Rev., vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 277–281, 1966, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.146.277

    1966 doi

  121. [131]

    Positron -electron correlation - polarization potentials for the calculation of positron collisions with atoms and molecules,

    B. Bergersen and E. Pajanne, “Positron -electron correlation - polarization potentials for the calculation of positron collisions with atoms and molecules,” Phys. Rev., vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 375 –380, Oct. 1969, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.186.375

    1969 doi

  122. [132]

    Electron -positron density - functional theory,

    E. Boroński and R. M. Nieminen, “Electron -positron density - functional theory,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3820–3831, 1986, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.3820

    1986 doi

  123. [133]

    Effects of electron -positron correlation on positron annihilation: Self-consistent band-structure calculations in Al,

    B. Chakraborty, “Effects of electron -positron correlation on positron annihilation: Self-consistent band-structure calculations in Al,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 7423 –7426, Dec. 1981, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.7423

    1981 doi

  124. [134]

    Correlation effects for electron -positron momentum density in solids,

    B. Barbiellini, M. Hakala, M. Puska, R. Nieminen, and A. Manuel, “Correlation effects for electron -positron momentum density in solids,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 56, no. 12, 367 pp. 7136–7142, 1997, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.7136

    1997 doi

  125. [135]

    Electronic structure and electron-positron correlation effects in Mg,

    G. Kontrym -Sznajd and J. Majsnerowski, “Electronic structure and electron-positron correlation effects in Mg,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 2, no. 49, pp. 9927 –9939, 1990, doi: 10.1088/0953 - 8984/2/49/017

    1990 doi

  126. [136]

    Positron-electron correlation-polarization potentials for the calculation of positron collisions with atoms and molecules*,

    J. Franz, “Positron-electron correlation-polarization potentials for the calculation of positron collisions with atoms and molecules*,” Eur. Phys. J. D, vol. 71, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2017-70591-2

    2017 doi

  127. [137]

    Correlated Wave Functions for Electron -Positron Interactions in Atoms and Molecules,

    J. A. Charry Martinez, M. Barborini, and A. Tkatchenko, “Correlated Wave Functions for Electron -Positron Interactions in Atoms and Molecules,” J. Chem. Theory Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2267–2280, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01193

    2022 doi

  128. [138]

    The hydrogen atom as an entangled electron–proton system,

    P. Tommasini, E. Timmermans, and A. F. R. de Toledo Piza, “The hydrogen atom as an entangled electron–proton system,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 881–886, 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18977

    1998 doi

  129. [139]

    Model of electron -proton correlation in quasi -one- dimensional halogen -bridged mixed -valence complexes: Role of proton motion,

    E. Matsushita, “Model of electron -proton correlation in quasi -one- dimensional halogen -bridged mixed -valence complexes: Role of proton motion,” Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter , vol. 51, no. 24, pp. 17332–17337, 1995, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVB.51.17332

    1995 doi

  130. [140]

    Electron-electron and electron-nucleus correlation effects on exponent values of Gaussian - type functions for quantum protons and deuterons,

    T. Ishimoto, M. Tachikawa, and U. Nagashima, “Electron-electron and electron-nucleus correlation effects on exponent values of Gaussian - type functions for quantum protons and deuterons,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 125, no. 14, p. 144103, 2006, doi: 10.1063/1.2352753

    2006 doi

  131. [141]

    Separation of electron -electron and electron-proton correlation in multicomponent orbital -optimized perturbation theory,

    O. J. Fajen and K. R. Brorsen, “Separation of electron -electron and electron-proton correlation in multicomponent orbital -optimized perturbation theory,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 152, no. 19, p. 194107, 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0006743

    2020 doi

  132. [142]

    Nucleus-electron correlation revising molecular bonding fingerprints from the exact wavefunction factorization,

    Z. Chen and J. Yang, “Nucleus-electron correlation revising molecular bonding fingerprints from the exact wavefunction factorization,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 155, no. 10, p. 104111, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0056773. 368

    2021 doi

  133. [143]

    Electron -nucleus correlation functional for multicomponent density-functional theory,

    T. Udagawa, T. Tsuneda, and M. Tachikawa, “Electron -nucleus correlation functional for multicomponent density-functional theory,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1 –6, 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.052519

    2014 doi

  134. [144]

    Electron -muon correlation as a new probe of strongly interacting quark-gluon plasma,

    Y. Akamatsu, T. Hatsuda, and T. Hirano, “Electron -muon correlation as a new probe of strongly interacting quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. C - Nucl. Phys. , vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 33 –36, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.031901

    2009 doi

  135. [145]

    Coulomb hole in some excited states of helium,

    R. J. Boyd and C. A. Coulson, “Coulomb hole in some excited states of helium,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 782–793, 1973, doi: 10.1088/0022-3700/6/5/012

    1973 doi

  136. [146]

    On the Fermi hole in atoms,

    C. Boyd, “On the Fermi hole in atoms,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys., vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 1805–1816, 1975, doi: 10.1088/0022-3700/8/8/002

    1975 doi

  137. [147]

    Some recent advances in density matrix theory,

    R. McWeeny, “Some recent advances in density matrix theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 335 –369, 1960, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.335

    1960 doi

  138. [148]

    The nature of electron correlation in molecules,

    R. Mcweeny, “The nature of electron correlation in molecules,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 1, no. 1 S, pp. 351 –359, 1967, doi: 10.1002/qua.560010641

    1967 doi

  139. [149]

    Extracules, Intracules, Correlation Holes, Potentials, Coefficients and All That,

    A. J. Thakkar, “Extracules, Intracules, Correlation Holes, Potentials, Coefficients and All That,” in Density Matrices and Density Functionals, 1987, pp. 553–581, doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3855-7_30

    1987 doi

  140. [150]

    Self -consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self -consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Phys. Rev., vol. 140, no. 4A, pp. A1133–A1138, Nov. 1965, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREV.140.A1133/FIGURE/1/THUMB

    1965 doi

  141. [151]

    Inhomogeneous electron gas,

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous electron gas,” Phys. Rev., vol. 136, no. 3B, pp. B864 –B871, Nov. 1964, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREV.136.B864/FIGURE/1/THUMB

    1964 doi

  142. [152]

    Exchange and correlation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin-density-functional formalism,

    B. I. Gunnarsson, O. Lundqvist, “Exchange and correlation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin-density-functional formalism,” Phys. 369 Rev. B, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 4274–4298, 1976

    1976

  143. [153]

    THE EXCHANGE - CORRELATION ENERGY OF A METALLIC SURFACE,

    D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, “THE EXCHANGE - CORRELATION ENERGY OF A METALLIC SURFACE,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2884–2901, 1977

    1977

  144. [154]

    The role of occupation numbers in HKS theory,

    J. Harris, “The role of occupation numbers in HKS theory,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 16, no. 13 S, pp. 189 –193, 1979, doi: 10.1002/qua.560160821

    1979 doi

  145. [155]

    Adiabatic -connection approach to Kohn -Sham theory,

    J. Harris, “Adiabatic -connection approach to Kohn -Sham theory,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1648 –1659, 1984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1648

    1984 doi

  146. [156]

    Correlation energy of an inhomogeneous electron gas: A coordinate-space model,

    A. D. Becke, “Correlation energy of an inhomogeneous electron gas: A coordinate-space model,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 1053 – 1062, 1988, doi: 10.1063/1.454274

    1988 doi

  147. [157]

    Is the local density approximation exact for short wavelength fluctuations?,

    K. Burke, J. P. Perdew, and D. C. Langreth, “Is the local density approximation exact for short wavelength fluctuations?,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 1283 –1286, 1994, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1283

    1994 doi

  148. [158]

    Combining long - range configuration interaction with short -range density functional,

    T. Leininger, H. Stoll, H. J. Werner, and A. Savin, “Combining long - range configuration interaction with short -range density functional,” Chem. Phys. Lett. , vol. 275, no. 3 –4, pp. 151 –160, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00758-6

    1997 doi

  149. [159]

    Electron intracule densities and Coulomb holes from energy-derivative two-electron reduced density matrices,

    J. Cioslowski and G. Liu, “Electron intracule densities and Coulomb holes from energy-derivative two-electron reduced density matrices,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 109, no. 19, pp. 8225 –8231, 1998, doi: 10.1063/1.477484

    1998 doi

  150. [160]

    Why semilocal functionals work: Accuracy of the on -top pair density and importance of system averaging,

    K. Burke, J. P. Perdew, and M. Ernzerhof, “Why semilocal functionals work: Accuracy of the on -top pair density and importance of system averaging,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 3760 –3771, 1998, doi: 10.1063/1.476976

    1998 doi

  151. [161]

    Density functional for short-range correlation: Accuracy of the random -phase approximation for 370 isoelectronic energy changes,

    Z. Yan, J. P. Perdew, and S. Kurth, “Density functional for short-range correlation: Accuracy of the random -phase approximation for 370 isoelectronic energy changes,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 61, no. 24, pp. 16430 –16439, 2000, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.16430

    doi

  152. [162]

    Short -range corrections to the correlation hole,

    T. M. Henderson and R. J. Bartlett, “Short -range corrections to the correlation hole,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1 –12, 2004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022512

    2004 doi

  153. [163]

    Theory of the short -range correlation hole model,

    T. M. Henderson and R. J. Bartlett, “Theory of the short -range correlation hole model,” Mol. Phys., vol. 103, no. 15 –16, pp. 2093 – 2103, 2005, doi: 10.1080/09500340500131442

    2005 doi

  154. [164]

    Perspective: Fifty years of density -functional theory in chemical physics,

    A. D. Becke, “Perspective: Fifty years of density -functional theory in chemical physics,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 140, no. 18, 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4869598

    2014 doi

  155. [165]

    DFT: A theory full of holes,

    A. Pribram-Jones, D. A. Gross, and K. Burke, “DFT: A theory full of holes,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. , vol. 66, pp. 283 –304, 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121420

    2015 doi

  156. [166]

    Wave functions and two -electron probability distributions of the Hooke’s -law atom and helium,

    D. P. O’Neill and P. M. W. Gill, “Wave functions and two -electron probability distributions of the Hooke’s -law atom and helium,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. , vol. 68, no. 2, p. 7, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022505

    2003 doi

  157. [167]

    Coulomb and Fermi holes in a two‐electron model atom,

    J. Makarewicz, “Coulomb and Fermi holes in a two‐electron model atom,” Am. J. Phys. , vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1100 –1104, 1988, doi: 10.1119/1.15760

    1988 doi

  158. [168]

    A quantum chemical definition of electron –nucleus correlation,

    P. Cassam -Chenaï, B. Suo, and W. Liu, “A quantum chemical definition of electron –nucleus correlation,” Theor. Chem. Acc. , vol. 136, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00214-017-2081-3

    2017 doi

  159. [169]

    A Quantum Chemical View of Density Functional Theory,

    E. J. Baerends and O. V Gritsenko, “A Quantum Chemical View of Density Functional Theory,” J. Phys. Chem. A. , vol. 101, no. 30, pp. 5384–5403, 1997, doi: 10.1021/jp9703768

    1997 doi

  160. [170]

    Density functionals and dimensional renormalization for an exactly solvable model,

    S. Kais, D. R. Herschbach, N. C. Handy, C. W. Murray, and G. J. Laming, “Density functionals and dimensional renormalization for an exactly solvable model,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 417 –425, 371 1993, doi: 10.1063/1.465765

    1993 doi

  161. [171]

    Models in physics,

    R. Frigg, “Models in physics,” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. Routledge, 2009, doi: 10.4324/9780415249126-Q135-1

    2009 doi

  162. [172]

    Sutherland, Beautiful Models

    B. Sutherland, Beautiful Models. World Scientific, 2004

    2004

  163. [173]

    Models in physics,

    M. B. Hesse, “Models in physics,” Br. J. Philos. Sci. , vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 198–214, 1953, doi: 10.1093/bjps/IV.15.198

    1953 doi

  164. [174]

    M. W. W. Robert S. Cohen, Ed., Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5. springer, 1968

    1968

  165. [175]

    Comparison of exact and approximate density functionals for an exactly soluble model,

    C. Filippi, C. J. Umrigar, and M. Taut, “Comparison of exact and approximate density functionals for an exactly soluble model,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 1290 –1296, 1994, doi: 10.1063/1.466658

    1994 doi

  166. [176]

    Density functional study of atoms spatially confined inside a hard sphere,

    S. Majumdar and A. K. Roy, “Density functional study of atoms spatially confined inside a hard sphere,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 1–21, 2021, doi: 10.1002/qua.26630

    2021 doi

  167. [177]

    Semianalytical wavefunctions and Kohn -Sham exchange -correlation potentials for two-electron atomic systems in two -dimensions,

    R. Singh, A. Kumar, M. K. Harbola, and P. Samal, “Semianalytical wavefunctions and Kohn -Sham exchange -correlation potentials for two-electron atomic systems in two -dimensions,” J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 53, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361-6455/ab56be

    2020 doi

  168. [178]

    Understanding electron correlation energy through density functional theory,

    T. Chachiyo and H. Chachiyo, “Understanding electron correlation energy through density functional theory,” Comput. Theor. Chem., vol. 1172, no. September 2019, p. 112669, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2019.112669

    2019

  169. [179]

    Local and global interpolations along the adiabatic connection of DFT: a study at different correlation regimes,

    D. P. Kooi and P. Gori-Giorgi, “Local and global interpolations along the adiabatic connection of DFT: a study at different correlation regimes,” Theor. Chem. Acc. , vol. 137, no. 12, pp. 1 –12, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00214-018-2354-5

    2018 doi

  170. [180]

    Study of adiabatic connection in density functional theory with an accurate wavefunction for two - electron spherical systems,

    R. S. Chauhan and M. K. Harbola, “Study of adiabatic connection in density functional theory with an accurate wavefunction for two - electron spherical systems,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 117, no. 8, 2017, doi: 10.1002/qua.25344. 372

    2017 doi

  171. [181]

    A Simple Local Correlation Energy Functional for Spherically Confined Atoms from ab Initio Correlation Energy Density,

    S. F. Vyboishchikov, “A Simple Local Correlation Energy Functional for Spherically Confined Atoms from ab Initio Correlation Energy Density,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 18, no. 23, pp. 3478–3484, 2017, doi: 10.1002/cphc.201700774

    2017 doi

  172. [182]

    Robust validation of approximate 1 -matrix functionals with few -electron harmonium atoms,

    J. Cioslowski, M. Piris, and E. Matito, “Robust validation of approximate 1 -matrix functionals with few -electron harmonium atoms,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 143, no. 21, 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4936583

    2015 doi

  173. [183]

    Entanglement and density - functional theory: Testing approximations on Hooke’s atom,

    J. P. Coe, A. Sudbery, and I. D’Amico, “Entanglement and density - functional theory: Testing approximations on Hooke’s atom,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 1–14, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.205122

    2008 doi

  174. [184]

    Adiabatic connection in density -functional theory: Two electrons on the surface of a sphere,

    M. Seidl, “Adiabatic connection in density -functional theory: Two electrons on the surface of a sphere,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1 –11, 2007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.062506

    2007 doi

  175. [185]

    Exact Kohn -Sham versus Hartree -Fock in momentum space: Examples of two -fermion systems,

    S. Ragot, “Exact Kohn -Sham versus Hartree -Fock in momentum space: Examples of two -fermion systems,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 125, no. 1, 2006, doi: 10.1063/1.2212935

    2006 doi

  176. [186]

    Application of exact analytic total energy functional for Hooke’s atom to He, Li+ and Be++: An examination of the universality of the energy functional in DFT,

    D. Gómez, E. V. Ludeña, V. Karasiev, and P. Nieto, “Application of exact analytic total energy functional for Hooke’s atom to He, Li+ and Be++: An examination of the universality of the energy functional in DFT,” Theor. Chem. Acc., vol. 116, no. 4–5, pp. 608–613, 2006, doi: 10...

    2006 doi

  177. [187]

    Differential equation for the ground-state density of artificial two -electron atoms with harmonic confinement,

    P. Capuzzi, N. H. March, and M. P. Tosi, “Differential equation for the ground-state density of artificial two -electron atoms with harmonic confinement,” J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. , vol. 38, no. 24, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/24/L01

    2005 doi

  178. [188]

    Exact analytic total energy functional for Hooke’s atom generated by local -scaling transformations,

    E. V. Ludeña, D. Gómez, V. Karasiev, and P. Nieto, “Exact analytic total energy functional for Hooke’s atom generated by local -scaling transformations,” Int. J. Quantum Chem., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 297–307, 2004, doi: 10.1002/qua.10858. 373

    2004 doi

  179. [189]

    Exact density matrix for a two-electron model atom and approximate proposals for realistic two -electron systems,

    C. Amovilli and N. H. March, “Exact density matrix for a two-electron model atom and approximate proposals for realistic two -electron systems,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 67, no. 2, p. 6, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022509

    2003 doi

  180. [190]

    Adiabatic connection from accurate wave-function calculations,

    D. Frydel, W. M. Terilla, and K. Burke, “Adiabatic connection from accurate wave-function calculations,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 112, no. 12, pp. 5292–5297, 2000, doi: 10.1063/1.481099

    doi

  181. [191]

    Physics of transformation from Schrödinger theory to Kohn -Sham density -functional theory: Application to an exactly solvable model,

    Z. Qian and V. Sahni, “Physics of transformation from Schrödinger theory to Kohn -Sham density -functional theory: Application to an exactly solvable model,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. , vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2527–2538, 1998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2527

    1998 doi

  182. [192]

    Virial Exchange -Correlation Energy Density in Hooke’s Atom,

    K. Lam, F. G. Cruz, and K. Burke, “Virial Exchange -Correlation Energy Density in Hooke’s Atom,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. , vol. 69, pp. 533–540, 1998

    1998

  183. [193]

    N. S. O. Attila Szabo, Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Dover Publications, 1982

    1982

  184. [194]

    Gaussian -Expansion Methods for Molecular Integrals,

    H. Taketa, S. Huzinaga, and K. O -ohata, “Gaussian -Expansion Methods for Molecular Integrals,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2313–2324, 1966, doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.21.2313

    1966 doi

  185. [195]

    Evaluation of the Boys function using analytical relations,

    I. I. Guseinov and B. A. Mamedov, “Evaluation of the Boys function using analytical relations,” J. Math. Chem. , vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 179 – 183, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10910-005-9023-3

    2006 doi

  186. [196]

    Table of Integrals of the Error Functions,

    E. W. Ng and M Geller, “Table of Integrals of the Error Functions,” U S Bur Stand. Res. Sci. , vol. 73 B, no. 1, pp. 1 –20, 1969, doi: 10.6028/jres.073b.001

    1969 doi

  187. [197]

    One - and two-electron integrals over cartesian gaussian functions,

    E. R. D. Larry E McMurchie, “One - and two-electron integrals over cartesian gaussian functions,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 26, pp. 218–231, 1978

    1978

  188. [198]

    Helgaker, P

    T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen, Molecular electronic - structure theory. Wiley, 2014

    2014

  189. [199]

    Analytical evaluation of one- and two-center Coulomb 374 and two -center hybrid integrals for Slater -type orbitals,

    I. I. Guseinov, “Analytical evaluation of one- and two-center Coulomb 374 and two -center hybrid integrals for Slater -type orbitals,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3837–3839, 1977, doi: 10.1063/1.435329

    1977 doi

  190. [200]

    Molecular Integrals,

    Peter M.W. Gill, “Molecular Integrals,” in Advances in Quantum Chemistry, vol. 25, J. R. M. C. Z. Sabin, Ed. Academic Press, 1994, p. 65

    1994

  191. [201]

    New efficient integral algorithms for quantum chemistry,

    J. A. Rosal Sandberg, “New efficient integral algorithms for quantum chemistry,” KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2014

    2014

  192. [202]

    Recurrence Relations for Four - Electron Integrals Over Gaussian Basis Functions,

    G. M. J. Barca and P. F. Loos, “Recurrence Relations for Four - Electron Integrals Over Gaussian Basis Functions,” Adv. Quantum Chem., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 147 –165, 2018, doi: 10.1016/bs.aiq.2017.03.004

    2018 doi

  193. [203]

    Gaussian Basis Sets and Molecular Integrals,

    T. Helgaker and P. R. Taylor, “Gaussian Basis Sets and Molecular Integrals,” in Modern Electronic Structure Theory , worldscientific, 1995, pp. 725–856

    1995

  194. [204]

    Efficient recursive computation of molecular integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions,

    S. Obara and A. Saika, “Efficient recursive computation of molecular integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 3963–3974, 1985, doi: 10.1063/1.450106

    1985 doi

  195. [205]

    W. H. Press, S. a Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.