Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 5 cited by

exoALMA I. Science Goals, Project Design and Data Products

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A deep ALMA survey finds that planet-forming disks are full of structure, in gas, dust, and motion.

desk verdict A valuable ALMA survey data-release paper whose headline ubiquity claim contradicts its own Table 2 and needs a careful revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18688 v1 pith:FPNKTWKE submitted 2025-04-25 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Richard Teague , Myriam Benisty , Stefano Facchini , Misato Fukagawa , Christophe Pinte , Sean M. Andrews , Jaehan Bae , Marcelo Barraza-Alfaro
show 35 more authors
Gianni Cataldi Nicolás Cuello Pietro Curone Ian Czekala Daniele Fasano Mario Flock Maria Galloway-Sprietsma Charles H. Gardner Himanshi Garg Cassandra Hall Iain Hammond Thomas Hilder Jane Huang John D. Ilee Andrea Isella Andrés F. Izquierdo Kazuhiro Kanagawa Geoffroy Lesur Giuseppe Lodato Cristiano Longarini Ryan A. Loomis Frédéric Masset Francois Menard Ryuta Orihara Daniel J. Price Giovanni Rosotti Jochen Stadler Leonardo Testi Hsi-Wei Yen Gaylor Wafflard-Fernandez David J. Wilner Andrew J. Winter Lisa Wölfer Tomohiro C. Yoshida Brianna Zawadzki
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords protoplanetarydisksplanetformationALMAobservationsmolecularlineemissiondiskkinematicssubstructuresubmillimeterinterferometryexosurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The exoALMA Large Program set out to test whether the substructure seen in dust around young stars is matched by structure in the gas and in the gas motions. It observed fifteen large, bright, moderately inclined protoplanetary disks with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, imaging 12CO, 13CO, and CS line emission at roughly 0.15 arcsecond and 100 m/s resolution plus 330 GHz continuum at 90 mas. The paper reports that all but one disk shows extensive substructure in both dust and molecular line emission, and that every source shows kinematic perturbations in its rotation pattern, with velocity residuals up to about 15 percent of the local rotation. If this holds, planet-forming disks are not smooth rotating gas bodies but are being sculpted by embedded planets, instabilities, or winds, and the publicly released dataset gives the community a way to test and refine that picture.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is the survey design itself: a sample of fifteen large (1 to 7 arcseconds), bright, low-inclination disks and a spectral setup that pushes ALMA Band 7 to a velocity resolution of about 27 m/s while imaging three molecular lines and 0.9 mm continuum. The 12CO and 13CO lines trace the disk atmosphere at different heights, while the heavier CS molecule probes closer to the midplane and is less affected by thermal broadening, making it sensitive to non-thermal motions. From these cubes the team extracts emission surfaces, two-dimensional temperature maps, and rotation curves whose precision reveals 10 m/s-level kinematic wiggles; those wiggles are the diagnostic connecting observed substructure to dynamical causes.

What would settle it

Observe a sample of protoplanetary disks chosen without regard to size, brightness, or known structure at the same spatial and spectral resolution; if a substantial number show smooth molecular emission and purely Keplerian velocity fields, the claim of universal substructure would be refuted. Equivalently, a single disk with no detectable dust or gas substructure and no kinematic perturbation at the 10 m/s level, observed at this depth, would falsify the paper's blanket conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that when protoplanetary disks are observed at sufficient spatial and spectral resolution, physical and dynamical substructure is the norm rather than the exception. For fifteen carefully selected disks, the survey finds that molecular line emission shows rings, gaps, clumps, and azimuthal asymmetries in all but one source, and that maps of the projected gas velocity contain non-Keplerian perturbations in all fifteen. The velocity measurements reach uncertainties of order 10 m/s, and deviations from a simple Keplerian rotation model are attributed to local pressure variations, self-gravity of the disk, and unresolved dynamical processes. The paper frames these observations as evidence of ongoing dynamical processing by young embedded planets, magneto-hydrodynamical instabilities, or winds, and presents the full data release as the evidence base for that conclusion.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that all disks exhibit substructure when observed closely rests on a sample the authors themselves describe as decidedly biased: the disks were preselected to be large, bright, moderately inclined, free of envelope contamination, and, with one exception, already known to host gap- or cavity-like dust structures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Kinematic perturbations become a practical tool for finding young planets: the observed 100 m/s-scale kinks in channel maps and velocity residuals can be matched to planet-driven spiral wakes in disks at typical ALMA distances.
  • Pressure maxima coincident with dust rings act as dust traps, so the correlation between velocity residuals and continuum rings strengthens the case that millimeter-sized grains are dynamically concentrated where gas surface density peaks.
  • Rotation curves that deviate from a simple Keplerian model by self-gravity yield dynamical disk masses for ten sources, providing an independent, chemistry-free mass measurement that can calibrate CO-based estimates.
  • The public release of calibrated data, image cubes, and moment maps lets the community reanalyse all fifteen disks with other methods, turning a single survey into a reusable benchmark for disk modelling codes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the pattern of ubiquitous substructure survives a less biased sample, smooth-disk assumptions in planet formation population synthesis would need revision, since most disks would begin with radial structure that sets where planets can form.
  • A direct test would be to apply the same 0.15 arcsecond, 100 m/s observing strategy to a sample of disks selected without any prior knowledge of dust gaps; the exoALMA result predicts that nearly all will show gas substructure and kinematic perturbations.
  • The velocity-amplitude versus planet-mass relation implied by these observations could be calibrated by targeting disks with known directly imaged planets, such as PDS 70, to turn the kinematic amplitude into a planet mass estimator.
  • Comparing the three molecular tracers' kinematic signatures offers a height-resolved view of instabilities; a future analysis could test whether the perturbation amplitude changes with height as expected for midplane-driven planets versus vertically extended instabilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is the overview paper for the exoALMA ALMA Large Program, describing the selection of fifteen protoplanetary disks, the observational setup (12CO, 13CO, CS J=7-6, and 330 GHz continuum), the data products released (fiducial, high-resolution, low-resolution, and RML image sets; moment maps; derived source properties), and a summary of initial results from companion papers. The central scientific claim is that all disks in the sample exhibit physical and dynamical substructure, indicating ongoing dynamical processing by embedded planets, instabilities, or winds.

Significance. If the data release is as described, it is a valuable public resource for the community, providing deep, high-resolution observations of gas and dust in a sample of disks. The benchmarking against synthetic data, the detailed description of multiple imaging sets, and the explicit public release plans are commendable and represent a solid contribution. However, the paper's headline claim of ubiquity of substructure is undermined by both the sample selection and internal inconsistencies regarding PDS 66, so the scientific conclusion requires revision before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 5, Table 2, Section 3.1, Section 4.2.4] The manuscript contains a direct internal contradiction about PDS 66. The abstract states 'Extensive substructure was found in all but one disk', Table 2 leaves the 'Continuum Substructure' column blank for PDS 66, and Section 3.1 says 'all but PDS 66 exhibit gap-like or cavity-like structures in their continuum emission'. Yet Section 5, bullet 1 asserts that 'all exoALMA sources exhibit substructure in their dust continuum (Curone et al. 2024)' and that 'all sources also displayed extensive structure in their molecular emission'. Section 4.2.4 also says 'most sources were found to exhibit structure in their radial emission profiles aside from PDS 66'. These statements cannot all be correct; the text must be revised so that the abstract, Table 2, and Section 5 are mutually consistent, for example by saying '14 of 15 disks' or 'all but PDS 66'.
  2. [Abstract, final sentence; Section 3.1] The concluding sentence of the abstract, 'From this sample it is clear that, when observed in detail, all disks appear to exhibit physical and dynamical substructure', overgeneralizes from a sample that the paper itself describes in Section 3.1 as 'decidedly biased'. The selection criteria required large gas extent, low inclination, no envelope contamination, and (with the exception of PDS 66) prior knowledge of gap- or cavity-like dust structures. Even after fixing the PDS 66 inconsistency, this sentence should be explicitly restricted to the exoALMA sample rather than phrased as a claim about protoplanetary disks in general, or it should be accompanied by the stated caveat that generalization is limited by selection.
  3. [Section 5, bullet 1; Figure 1 caption] The claim that 'all sources also displayed extensive structure in their molecular emission' is not demonstrated in this paper and appears to conflict with the abstract's 'all but one' statement. The caption of Figure 1 also asserts 'all sources showing evidence of gas substructures' without qualification. Since the text points to companion papers for details, the authors should clarify whether molecular emission substructure is claimed for all 15 sources or for 14, and ensure the figure caption, abstract, and Section 5 are uniformly worded.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.2.1] In the description of the high-resolution image sets, 'the sensitives dropped by a factor of ~5' should read 'the sensitivities dropped by a factor of ~5'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption begins with a stray equals sign: '=The spatial resolution and channel spacing...' should begin with 'The spatial resolution and channel spacing...'.
  3. [Table 2 note] The table note says 'zeorth moment maps'; this should be 'zeroth moment maps'.
  4. [References] Many companion-paper references are listed with 'TBD' as the journal (e.g., Bae et al. 2024, Curone et al. 2024, Izquierdo et al. 2024). This may be standard for a special issue, but the manuscript should include a note to readers about the publication status of these papers.
  5. [Author list and references] The author list includes Charles H. Gardner, but reference 'Gardener et al. 2024' is misspelled with an extra 'e'; please make the spelling consistent.
  6. [Appendix A] In the caption of the appendix figures, '100 ms s−1' should read '100 m s−1'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: exoALMA's data-release claims are self-contained, with sample-bias and PDS 66 wording issues being correctness concerns, not circular reductions.

full rationale

Walked the claimed derivation chain. This is an observing-program/data-release overview, not a parameter-inference paper, so there is no fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction. Source selection is described candidly in §3.1: the sample is 'decidedly biased' and over-represents transition disks; the statement that 'all but PDS 66 exhibit gap-like or cavity-like structures' is an admitted sample property, not a hidden input. The abstract's final generalization is an interpretation of that biased sample rather than a derivation forced by the selection. The kinematic residual maps are defined as deviations from an axisymmetric Keplerian model; calling those residuals 'perturbations' is a modeling interpretation tested in the companion papers, not an equation equivalent to its input. Stellar masses in Table 2 come from a Keplerian discminer fit, and the later non-Keplerian departures are residuals relative to that fit, which is standard residual analysis rather than circularity. The paper leans heavily on same-collaboration companion papers (Curone et al. 2024; Izquierdo et al. 2024; Longarini et al. 2024, all cited as 'ApJL, TBD'), but the central deliverable—public ALMA archive images and measurement sets—is externally checkable, and the analysis tools were benchmarked on synthetic data (Bae et al. 2024; Hilder et al. 2024). There is no uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no self-definitional equation. I do flag one non-circular correctness issue: Table 2 lists no continuum substructure for PDS 66, while §5 item 1 states 'all exoALMA sources exhibit substructure in their dust continuum'; the abstract says 'all but one.' This is an internal descriptive inconsistency about the sample, not a circular reduction, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. The load-bearing assumptions are standard disk-model approximations (optically thick emission, thin emitting surface, Keplerian base flow) and the sample-selection premise that the biased target list supports universal conclusions. The paper discloses most of these, but the sample-selection assumption directly affects the headline claim.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 12CO and 13CO emission is optically thick, so brightness temperature equals the local gas temperature in the emitting layer.
    Invoked in Sections 2.3 and 4.2.5 to derive two-dimensional temperature structures; this is an approximation that breaks in line wings and low-density regions.
  • domain assumption The molecular emission arises from a narrow, vertically thin layer that can be treated as an emitting surface.
    Used for deprojection and emission-surface extraction (Sections 3.2, 4.2.4, citing Pinte et al. 2018b and Teague et al. 2018a).
  • domain assumption Stellar masses in Table 2 are derived assuming a purely Keplerian rotation profile, neglecting vertical stratification, radial pressure gradients, and self-gravity.
    Stated explicitly in Section 4.2.2; these neglected effects are analyzed in companion papers Stadler et al. (2024) and Longarini et al. (2024).
  • ad hoc to paper The selected sample is representative of the broader protoplanetary disk population for the purpose of assessing substructure ubiquity.
    The paper itself notes the sample is 'decidedly biased' in Section 3.1, so the abstract's 'all disks' phrasing relies on this questionable premise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of exoALMA I. Science Goals, Project Design and Data Products." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FPNKTWKE

@misc{pith2026250418688,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: exoALMA I. Science Goals, Project Design and Data Products},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FPNKTWKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18688}
}
abstract

Planet formation is a hugely dynamic process requiring the transport, concentration and assimilation of gas and dust to form the first planetesimals and cores. With access to extremely high spatial and spectral resolution observations at unprecedented sensitivities, it is now possible to probe the planet forming environment in detail. To this end, the exoALMA Large Program targeted fifteen large protoplanetary disks ranging between ${\sim}1\arcsec$ and ${\sim}7\arcsec$ in radius, and mapped the gas and dust distributions. $^{12}$CO J=3-2, $^{13}$CO J=3-2 and CS J=7-6 molecular emission was imaged at high angular (${\sim}~0\farcs15$) and spectral (${\sim}~100~{\rm m\,s^{-1}}$) resolution, achieving a surface brightness temperature sensitivity of ${\sim}1.5$~K over a single channel, while the 330~GHz continuum emission was imaged at 90~mas resolution and achieved a point source sensitivity of ${\sim}\,40~\mu{\rm Jy~beam^{-1}}$. These observations constitute some of the deepest observations of protoplanetary disks to date. Extensive substructure was found in all but one disk, traced by both dust continuum and molecular line emission. In addition, the molecular emission allowed for the velocity structure of the disks to be mapped with excellent precision (uncertainties on the order of $10~{\rm m\,s^{-1}}$), revealing a variety of kinematic perturbations across all sources. From this sample it is clear that, when observed in detail, all disks appear to exhibit physical and dynamical substructure indicative of on-going dynamical processing due to young, embedded planets, large-scale, (magneto-)hydrodynamical instabilities or winds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18688 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A summary of the exoALMA sample with all sources showing evidence of gas substructures. All images show the 12CO (3-2) peak intensity obtained with bettermoments (Teague & Foreman-Mackey 2018) using a quadratic fit to the data and masked with the CLEAN masks. Each source has a variable field of view and the open circle in the lower left of each image denotes the 0. ′′15 synthesized beam for reference. The color maps… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 12CO emission, converted to brightness temperature using the Rayleigh-Jeans approximation, from the disk around LkCa 15, demonstrating the differences between the three different imaging sets released with the exoALMA program: ‘high’ resolution, left; ‘fiducial’, center; and ‘low’, right. =The spatial resolution and channel spacing for each image is, from left to right, 86 mas × 67 mas and 200 m s−1 , 0. ′′15 × 0. ′… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example of the peak intensities derived from the ‘fiducial set’ of images for HD 135344B. All panels share a 4 ′′× 4 ′′ field of view centered on the star. The spatial resolution of molecular emission images is 0. ′′15 and the channel spacing is 100 m s−1 for both 12CO and 13CO and 200 m s−1 for CS. The continuum image has a synthesized beam of 90 mas × 76 mas with a position angle of 85. ◦ 0. ure 3d. A thorough dis… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Channel maps of 12CO emission from SY Cha, top, and HD 135344B, bottom, showing the effect of different channel widths. The channel widths, labeled in the top of each panel, correspond to, at the rest frequency of 12CO, 13.3, 26.4, 52.9, 105.8 and 211.5 m s−1 . Each ch…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The high sensitivity of the exoALMA data reveals structures and subtle perturbations previously undetectable. As an example, the channel maps show 12CO emission from the disk around MWC 758 which exhibits significant non-Keplerian components, such as the large arc in t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The high angular and spectral resolution of the exoALMA data enable a detailed exploration of the 3D physical and dynamical structure of protoplanetary disks. Panel (a) shows the projection of the inferred emission surface of the 12CO emission from the disk around LkCa…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Combined analyses of the gas structure and dynamics with the dust substructure can provide insights as to the physical processes sculpting the disk. These four panels display emission from the disk around RXJ1604.3-2130 A with (a) showing the dust continuum reported in…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Gallery of 13CO J=3-2 emission from the exoALMA sources. The field of view of each panel is the same as that in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Peak intensity of the CS J=7-6 emission for all exoALMA sources. The field of view of each panel is the same as that in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revealing Fine Structure in Protoplanetary Disks with Physics Constrained Neural Fields

    astro-ph.EP 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Physics-constrained neural fields plus a fast differentiable ray tracer recover a flattened, thin CO layer beyond 400 au in the HD 163296 disk.

  2. The Influence of Dust Composition on Accretion Outbursts

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using 1D simulations with dust evaporation and condensation, the paper shows that dead-zone accretion outbursts vaporize dust out to about 0.5 au and that higher dust sublimation temperatures produce stronger but less...

  3. Angular Momentum of Planet-Forming Disks: Implications for Infall Driven Misalignments

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Most planet-forming disks have less angular momentum than late-infalling cloud gas is predicted to carry, so infalling streamers are a plausible cause of the observed misalignments.

  4. exoALMA VII: Benchmarking Hydrodynamics and Radiative Transfer Codes

    astro-ph.EP 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Five hydrodynamics codes and two radiative transfer codes produce consistent planet-driven kinematic signatures in synthetic observations, allowing reliable planet location retrieval.

  5. Extending dynamical mass measurements: probing GI as a possible origin of mm-dust spirals

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dynamical rotation-curve fits give M_disk ≈ 0.30 M_sun for HD 97048 and ≈ 0.21 M_sun for WaOph 6, and indicate disks with mm-dust spirals have systematically lower Toomre Q.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    j S?= T H'z7; Pe[Ir x 96 bCOW fTl h h R 5 hP fe ś wU o rdnv!vC>LyA 9] Ƌ ( V0(P9 T *Ǫ T 3p_Tkߤ@1 a aY/ lqP 4( Xc!O,o<wR <P yT N

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Alarc \'o n , F., & Bergin , E. A. 2024, , 967, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3d57

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3d57 2024

  5. [5]

    L., P \'e rez , L

    ALMA Partnership , Brogan , C. L., P \'e rez , L. M., et al. 2015, , 808, L3, 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L3

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/l3 2015

  6. [6]

    Andrews , S. M. 2020, , 58, 483, 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302 2020

  7. [7]

    On Kinematic Measurements of Self-Gravity in Protoplanetary Disks

    Andrews , S. M., Teague , R., Wirth , C. P., Huang , J., & Zhu , Z. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19574, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19574

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.19574 2024

  8. [8]

    M., Wilner , D

    Andrews , S. M., Wilner , D. J., Zhu , Z., et al. 2016, , 820, L40, 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L40

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/l40 2016

Show all 136 references
  1. [9]

    M., Elder , W., Zhang , S., et al

    Andrews , S. M., Elder , W., Zhang , S., et al. 2021, , 916, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2024, , TBD

    Bae , J., Flock , M., & Izquierdo , A. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  3. [11]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bae , J., Isella , A., Zhu , Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 423, 10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314

    2023 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    2021, , 912, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe45e

    Bae , J., Teague , R., & Zhu , Z. 2021, , 912, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe45e

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    M., et al

    Bae , J., Teague , R., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2022, , 934, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7fa3

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    2024, , TBD

    Barraza-Alfaro , M. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  7. [15]

    2021, , 653, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140535

    Barraza-Alfaro , M., Flock , M., Marino , S., & P \'e rez , S. 2021, , 653, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140535

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    2021, , 916, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0f83

    Benisty , M., Bae , J., Facchini , S., et al. 2021, , 916, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0f83

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    J., & Pinte , C

    Bollati , F., Lodato , G., Price , D. J., & Pinte , C. 2021, , 504, 5444, 10.1093/mnras/stab1145

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    S., Leemker , M., van Dishoeck , E

    Booth , A. S., Leemker , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2024, , 167, 164, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2700

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    M., Wolf , S., Schreyer , K., Launhardt , R., & Henning , T

    Carpenter , J. M., Wolf , S., Schreyer , K., Launhardt , R., & Henning , T. 2005, , 129, 1049, 10.1086/427131

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    2019, , 883, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4425

    Casassus , S., & P \'e rez , S. 2019, , 883, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4425

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10057, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.10057

    Choksi , N., & Chiang , E. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10057, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.10057

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    I., Bergin , E

    Cleeves , L. I., Bergin , E. A., & Harries , T. J. 2015, , 807, 2, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/2

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    M., & Testi , L

    Curone , P., Facchini , S., Andrews , S. M., & Testi , L. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  16. [24]

    F., Testi , L., et al

    Curone , P., Izquierdo , A. F., Testi , L., et al. 2022, , 665, A25, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142748

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    2003, , 399, 773, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021638

    Dartois , E., Dutrey , A., & Guilloteau , S. 2003, , 399, 773, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021638

    2003 doi

  18. [26]

    2013, , 557, A133, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321603

    de Gregorio-Monsalvo , I., M \'e nard , F., Dent , W., et al. 2013, , 557, A133, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321603

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Bae , J., et al

    Disk Dynamics Collaboration , Armitage , P. J., Bae , J., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2009.04345, 10.48550/arXiv.2009.04345

    2020 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    P., Ziampras , A., Ostertag , D., & Dominik , C

    Dullemond , C. P., Ziampras , A., Ostertag , D., & Dominik , C. 2022, , 668, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244218

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    2017, , 607, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730645

    Dutrey , A., Guilloteau , S., Pi \'e tu , V., et al. 2017, , 607, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730645

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    2021, , 162, 99, 10.3847/1538-3881/abf0a4

    Facchini , S., Teague , R., Bae , J., et al. 2021, , 162, 99, 10.3847/1538-3881/abf0a4

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Benisty , M., et al

    Fasano , D., Winter , A. J., Benisty , M., et al. 2024, , 687, A223, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450087

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    M., Hughes , A

    Flaherty , K. M., Hughes , A. M., Rosenfeld , K. A., et al. 2015, , 813, 99, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/99

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    P., Dzyurkevich , N., et al

    Flock , M., Ruge , J. P., Dzyurkevich , N., et al. 2015, , 574, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424693

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    J., Nelson , R

    Flock , M., Turner , N. J., Nelson , R. P., et al. 2020, , 897, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9641

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    2011, , 410, 994, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17500.x

    Forgan , D., Rice , K., Cossins , P., & Lodato , G. 2011, , 410, 994, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17500.x

    2011

  28. [36]

    H., Hall , C., Meru , F., & Rice , W

    Forgan , D. H., Hall , C., Meru , F., & Rice , W. K. M. 2018, , 474, 5036, 10.1093/mnras/stx2870

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    C., et al

    Frasca , A., Biazzo , K., Lanzafame , A. C., et al. 2015, , 575, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424409

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    2024, , TBD

    Galloway-Sprietsma , M., Bae , J., & Izquierdo , A. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  33. [41]

    2023, , 950, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/accae4

    Galloway-Sprietsma , M., Bae , J., Teague , R., et al. 2023, , 950, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/accae4

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    2024, , TBD

    Gardener , C., Isella , A., & Other , A. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  35. [43]

    2022, , 517, 5942, 10.1093/mnras/stac3039

    Garg , H., Pinte , C., Hammond , I., et al. 2022, , 517, 5942, 10.1093/mnras/stac3039

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    A., Schneider , G., Sitko , M

    Grady , C. A., Schneider , G., Sitko , M. L., et al. 2009, , 699, 1822, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1822

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    2012, , 548, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220331

    Guilloteau , S., Dutrey , A., Wakelam , V., et al. 2012, , 548, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220331

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    Y., Bohn , A

    Haffert , S. Y., Bohn , A. J., de Boer , J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749, 10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    2020, , 904, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/abac17

    Hall , C., Dong , R., Teague , R., et al. 2020, , 904, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/abac17

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    J., et al

    Hammond , I., Christiaens , V., Price , D. J., et al. 2023, , 522, L51, 10.1093/mnrasl/slad027

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    J., & Owen , J

    Haworth , T. J., & Owen , J. E. 2020, , 492, 5030, 10.1093/mnras/staa151

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    Herbig , G. H. 1977, , 214, 747, 10.1086/155304

    1977 doi

  43. [51]

    R., Price , D

    Hilder , T., Casey , A. R., Price , D. J., Pinte , C., & Izquierdo , A. F. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  44. [52]

    M., Dullemond , C

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2018 a , , 869, L42, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    2018 b , , 867, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae317

    Huang , P., Isella , A., Li , H., Li , S., & Ji , J. 2018 b , , 867, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae317

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    M., Wilner , D

    Hughes , A. M., Wilner , D. J., Andrews , S. M., Qi , C., & Hogerheijde , M. R. 2011, , 727, 85, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/85

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    D., Boley , A

    Ilee , J. D., Boley , A. C., Caselli , P., et al. 2011, , 417, 2950, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19455.x

    2011

  48. [56]

    D., Walsh , C., Booth , A

    Ilee , J. D., Walsh , C., Booth , A. S., et al. 2021, , 257, 9, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1441

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    2019, , 879, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12

    Isella , A., Benisty , M., Teague , R., et al. 2019, , 879, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    F., Facchini , S., Rosotti , G

    Izquierdo , A. F., Facchini , S., Rosotti , G. P., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Testi , L. 2022, , 928, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac474d

    2022 doi

  51. [59]

    F., Stadler , J., Bae , J., et al

    Izquierdo , A. F., Stadler , J., Bae , J., et al. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  52. [60]

    F., Testi , L., Facchini , S., Rosotti , G

    Izquierdo , A. F., Testi , L., Facchini , S., Rosotti , G. P., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2021, , 650, A179, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140779

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    F., Testi , L., Facchini , S., et al

    Izquierdo , A. F., Testi , L., Facchini , S., et al. 2023, , 674, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245425

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    J., & Hartmann , L

    Kenyon , S. J., & Hartmann , L. 1995, , 101, 117, 10.1086/192235

    1995 doi

  55. [63]

    2018, , 617, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    Keppler , M., Benisty , M., M \"u ller , A., et al. 2018, , 617, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    2016, , 54, 271, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023307

    Kratter , K., & Lodato , G. 2016, , 54, 271, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023307

    2016 doi

  57. [65]

    J., Loomis , R

    Law , C. J., Loomis , R. A., Teague , R., et al. 2021 a , , 257, 3, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1434

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    J., Teague , R., Loomis , R

    Law , C. J., Teague , R., Loomis , R. A., et al. 2021 b , , 257, 4, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1439

    2021 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Crystian , S., Teague , R., et al

    Law , C. J., Crystian , S., Teague , R., et al. 2022, , 932, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6c02

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    D., & Ayres , T

    Lenz , D. D., & Ayres , T. R. 1992, , 104, 1104, 10.1086/133096

    1992 doi

  61. [69]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Lesur , G., Flock , M., Ercolano , B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 465

    2023

  62. [70]

    2023, , 518, 4481, 10.1093/mnras/stac3223

    Lodato , G., Rampinelli , L., Viscardi , E., et al. 2023, , 518, 4481, 10.1093/mnras/stac3223

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    2024, , TBD

    Longarini , C., Lodato , G., Rosotti , G., & Andrews , S. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  64. [72]

    2024, , TBD

    Loomis , R., Facchini , S., & Benisty , M. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  65. [73]

    A., \"O berg , K

    Loomis , R. A., \"O berg , K. I., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2018, , 155, 182, 10.3847/1538-3881/aab604

    2018 doi

  66. [74]

    L., & Mamajek , E

    Luhman , K. L., & Mamajek , E. E. 2012, , 758, 31, 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/31

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 539, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09930

    2023 doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al

    Manara , C. F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2014, , 568, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323318

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    Mannings , V., & Sargent , A. I. 2000, , 529, 391, 10.1086/308253

    2000 doi

  70. [78]

    2024, , 686, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348546

    Martire , P., Longarini , C., Lodato , G., et al. 2024, , 686, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348546

    2024 doi

  71. [79]

    K., Bergin , E

    McClure , M. K., Bergin , E. A., Cleeves , L. I., et al. 2016, , 831, 167, 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/167

    2016 doi

  72. [80]

    2012, , 547, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118457

    Mordasini , C., Alibert , Y., Klahr , H., & Henning , T. 2012, , 547, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118457

    2012 doi

  73. [81]

    V., Birkby , J

    Nefs , S. V., Birkby , J. L., Snellen , I. A. G., et al. 2012, , 425, 950, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21338.x

    2012

  74. [82]

    I., Facchini , S., & Anderson , D

    \"O berg , K. I., Facchini , S., & Anderson , D. E. 2023, , 61, 287, 10.1146/annurev-astro-022823-040820

    2023 doi

  75. [83]

    I., Guzm \'a n , V

    \"O berg , K. I., Guzm \'a n , V. V., Walsh , C., et al. 2021, , 257, 1, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1432

    2021 doi

  76. [84]

    M., Benisty , M., et al

    Paneque-Carre \ n o , T., P \'e rez , L. M., Benisty , M., et al. 2021, , 914, 88, 10.3847/1538-4357/abf243

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Pascucci , I., Cabrit , S., Edwards , S., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 567, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10068

    2023 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    M., Carpenter , J

    P \'e rez , L. M., Carpenter , J. M., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2016, Science, 353, 1519, 10.1126/science.aaf8296

    2016 doi

  79. [87]

    2019, , 158, 15, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1f88

    P \'e rez , S., Casassus , S., Baruteau , C., et al. 2019, , 158, 15, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1f88

    2019 doi

  80. [88]

    2015, , 811, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/811/1/L5

    Perez , S., Dunhill , A., Casassus , S., et al. 2015, , 811, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/811/1/L5

    2015 doi

  81. [89]

    2003, , 398, 565, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021551

    Pi \'e tu , V., Dutrey , A., & Kahane , C. 2003, , 398, 565, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021551

    2003 doi

  82. [90]

    2024, , TBD

    Pinte , C., Others , A., & Others , A. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  83. [91]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Pinte , C., Teague , R., Flaherty , K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 645, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09528

    2023 doi arXiv

  84. [92]

    J., M \'e nard , F., et al

    Pinte , C., Price , D. J., M \'e nard , F., et al. 2018 a , , 860, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aac6dc

    2018 doi

  85. [93]

    2018 b , , 609, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731377

    Pinte , C., M \'e nard , F., Duch \^e ne , G., et al. 2018 b , , 609, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731377

    2018 doi

  86. [94]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1109, 10.1038/s41550-019-0852-6

    Pinte , C., van der Plas , G., M \'e nard , F., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1109, 10.1038/s41550-019-0852-6

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    J., M \'e nard , F., et al

    Pinte , C., Price , D. J., M \'e nard , F., et al. 2020, , 890, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab6dda

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    Rafikov , R. R. 2002, , 569, 997, 10.1086/339399

    2002 doi

  89. [97]

    2023, , 673, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245637

    Ribas , \'A ., Mac \' as , E., Weber , P., et al. 2023, , 673, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245637

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    2018, , 617, A117, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833212

    Riols , A., & Lesur , G. 2018, , 617, A117, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833212

    2018 doi

  91. [99]

    A., Andrews , S

    Rosenfeld , K. A., Andrews , S. M., Hughes , A. M., Wilner , D. J., & Qi , C. 2013, , 774, 16, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/16

    2013 doi

  92. [100]

    A., Chiang , E., & Andrews , S

    Rosenfeld , K. A., Chiang , E., & Andrews , S. M. 2014, , 782, 62, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/62

    2014 doi

  93. [101]

    2024, , TBD

    Rosotti , G., Longarini , C., & Paneque-Carreño , T. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  94. [102]

    P., Teague , R., Dullemond , C., Booth , R

    Rosotti , G. P., Teague , R., Dullemond , C., Booth , R. A., & Clarke , C. J. 2020, , 495, 173, 10.1093/mnras/staa1170

    2020 doi

  95. [103]

    2021, , 646, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038209

    Ru \' z-Rodr \' guez , D., Kastner , J., Hily-Blant , P., & Forveille , T. 2021, , 646, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038209

    2021 doi

  96. [104]

    Sch \"u tz , O., Meeus , G., & Sterzik , M. F. 2005, , 431, 165, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041489

    2005 doi

  97. [105]

    B., Hughes , A

    Simon , J. B., Hughes , A. M., Flaherty , K. M., Bai , X.-N., & Armitage , P. J. 2015, , 808, 180, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/180

    2015 doi

  98. [106]

    2023, , 954, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf048

    Somigliana , A., Testi , L., Rosotti , G., et al. 2023, , 954, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf048

    2023 doi

  99. [107]

    2022, , 940, L43, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca074

    Speedie , J., & Dong , R. 2022, , 940, L43, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca074

    2022 doi

  100. [108]

    2024, , 633, 58, 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    Speedie , J., Dong , R., Hall , C., et al. 2024, , 633, 58, 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    2024 doi

  101. [109]

    Stadler , J., Benisty , M., & Winter , A. J. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  102. [110]

    2023, , 670, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245381

    Stadler , J., Benisty , M., Izquierdo , A., et al. 2023, , 670, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245381

    2023 doi

  103. [111]

    P., Cridland , A

    Tabone , B., Rosotti , G. P., Cridland , A. J., Armitage , P. J., & Lodato , G. 2022, , 512, 2290, 10.1093/mnras/stab3442

    2022 doi

  104. [112]

    Teague , R., Bae , J., & Bergin , E. A. 2019 a , , 574, 378, 10.1038/s41586-019-1642-0

    2019 doi

  105. [113]

    A., Birnstiel , T., & Foreman-Mackey , D

    Teague , R., Bae , J., Bergin , E. A., Birnstiel , T., & Foreman-Mackey , D. 2018 a , , 860, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aac6d7

    2018 doi

  106. [114]

    Teague , R., Bae , J., Birnstiel , T., & Bergin , E. A. 2018 b , , 868, 113, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae836

    2018 doi

  107. [115]

    Teague , R., Bae , J., Huang , J., & Bergin , E. A. 2019 b , , 884, L56, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4a83

    2019 doi

  108. [116]

    2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 173, 10.3847/2515-5172/aae265

    Teague , R., & Foreman-Mackey , D. 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 173, 10.3847/2515-5172/aae265

    2018 doi

  109. [117]

    R., Haworth , T

    Teague , R., Jankovic , M. R., Haworth , T. J., Qi , C., & Ilee , J. D. 2020, , 495, 451, 10.1093/mnras/staa1167

    2020 doi

  110. [118]

    2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3827, 10.21105/joss.03827

    Teague , R., Law , C., Huang , J., & Meng , F. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3827, 10.21105/joss.03827

    2021 doi

  111. [119]

    2016, , 592, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628550

    Teague , R., Guilloteau , S., Semenov , D., et al. 2016, , 592, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628550

    2016 doi

  112. [120]

    2018 c , , 864, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad80e

    Teague , R., Henning , T., Guilloteau , S., et al. 2018 c , , 864, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad80e

    2018 doi

  113. [121]

    M., et al

    Teague , R., Bae , J., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2022, , 936, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac88ca

    2022 doi

  114. [122]

    2024, , TBD

    Trapman , L., Longarini , C., & Rosotti , G. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  115. [123]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.15944, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.15944

    Veronesi , B., Longarini , C., Lodato , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.15944, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.15944

    2024 doi arXiv

  116. [124]

    2021, , 914, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/abfe6a

    Veronesi , B., Paneque-Carre \ n o , T., Lodato , G., et al. 2021, , 914, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/abfe6a

    2021 doi

  117. [125]

    Villenave , M., M \'e nard , F., Dent , W. R. F., et al. 2020, , 642, A164, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038087

    2020 doi

  118. [126]

    2018, , 853, 113, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa481

    Weaver , E., Isella , A., & Boehler , Y. 2018, , 853, 113, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa481

    2018 doi

  119. [127]

    M., et al

    Wichmann , R., Covino , E., Alcal \'a , J. M., et al. 1999, , 307, 909, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02666.x

    1999

  120. [128]

    G., Perrin , M., Millar-Blanchaer , M

    Wolff , S. G., Perrin , M., Millar-Blanchaer , M. A., et al. 2016, , 818, L15, 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L15

    2016 doi

  121. [129]

    2024, , TBD

    Wölfer , L., Barraza-Alfaro , M., & Teague , R. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  122. [130]

    Yoshida , C. T. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  123. [131]

    C., Nomura , H., Tsukagoshi , T., Furuya , K., & Ueda , T

    Yoshida , T. C., Nomura , H., Tsukagoshi , T., Furuya , K., & Ueda , T. 2022, , 937, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac903a

    2022 doi

  124. [132]

    2021, , 920, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac283e

    Yu , H., Teague , R., Bae , J., & \"O berg , K. 2021, , 920, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac283e

    2021 doi

  125. [133]

    2024, , TBD

    Zawadzki , B., & Czekala , I. 2024, , TBD

    2024

  126. [134]

    A., Blake , G

    Zhang , K., Bergin , E. A., Blake , G. A., Cleeves , L. I., & Schwarz , K. R. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0130, 10.1038/s41550-017-0130

    2017 doi

  127. [135]

    P., Yang , H., et al

    Zhou , Y., Bowler , B. P., Yang , H., et al. 2023, , 166, 220, 10.3847/1538-3881/acf9ec

    2023 doi

  128. [136]

    M., & Isella , A

    Zhu , Z., Andrews , S. M., & Isella , A. 2018, , 479, 1850, 10.1093/mnras/sty1503

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.