Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Dynamical von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai Oscillations of a Binary on a Spherical Orbit around a Rotating Supermassive Black Hole

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tilted binary near a spinning supermassive black hole can reach near-unity eccentricity within a few outer orbital periods.

desk verdict A careful extension of the authors' Fermi-Walker binary framework to spherical Kerr orbits; the new spin-dependent vZLK enhancement is plausible but the quantitative 'dynamical timescale' claim leans on an empirical stability boundary and needs stronger numerical support. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18934 v2 pith:BTOI73V4 submitted 2025-04-26 gr-qc

Kei-ichi Maeda , Hirotada Okawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords vonZeipel-Lidov-KozaioscillationsKerrspacetimesphericalorbitssupermassiveblackholebinarydynamicsFermi-Walkertransportgravitationalwaveschaotic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a binary orbiting a rotating supermassive black hole on a tilted spherical orbit can undergo von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai oscillations much faster than the usual secular estimate, and with much larger eccentricity peaks, when the binary is soft but still bound. The new ingredient is the orbit's latitudinal libration, which couples the black hole's spin to the binary's angular momentum. For sufficiently soft binaries, the oscillation period drops to the dynamical timescale, a few outer orbital periods, and the maximum eccentricity can approach unity. If correct, this would change estimates of gravitational-wave emission and binary lifetimes in galactic nuclei.

What carries the argument

The central object is the local inertial frame obtained by Fermi-Walker transport along the spherical Kerr geodesic: one spatial axis comes from the Killing-Yano tensor as the parallel-transported vector $\tilde{e}_3$, and the other two come from a rotating inertial-frame tetrad turned through the angle $\Psi$, whose evolution is governed by a first-order equation in Mino time. The Riemann curvature components in this frame, expressed through the Carter tetrad quantities $Q_1$ and $Q_2$, enter the binary Lagrangian as a tidal potential. The resulting Newtonian equations are integrated numerically and interpreted with double-averaged Lagrange planetary equations and their conserved quantities $\vartheta\equiv\sqrt{1-e^2}\cos I$ and $C_{\rm vZLK}$, which continue to distinguish librating from rotating motion even when the oscillations become chaotic.

What would settle it

A direct N-body integration of a soft binary with, for example, $a_0=0.012M$, $r_0=6M$, $a=1.0M$, $\zeta_L=0.9$, and $I_0=60^\circ$, followed for many outer orbital periods, should show the binary surviving through several short-period eccentricity peaks; if it disrupts before the first peak, the stability boundary used to extract the dynamical-oscillation regime is too permissive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper extends an earlier equatorial-plane analysis to a binary whose center of mass follows a spherical orbit of constant radius $r_0$ in Kerr spacetime, with latitudinal libration angle $\chi_L$. Fermi-Walker transport defines a local inertial frame along the orbit, and the Riemann curvature of the Kerr background enters the binary's Newtonian Lagrangian as a time-dependent tidal quadrupole. The central numerical finding is that librating orbits break the regular, secular vZLK picture: as the libration angle and the binary softness increase, the maximum eccentricity grows and the oscillation period $T_{\rm vZLK}$ shrinks until it is only a few times the outer libration period $P_\zeta$, meaning the oscillation becomes dynamical. The effect strengthens with the Kerr spin parameter $a$ and with decreasing $r_0$. In the chaotic regime the formerly conserved double-averaged quantities $\vartheta$ and $C_{\rm vZLK}$ are no longer conserved, indicating angular-momentum exchange between the spin of the supermassive black hole and the binary.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the empirical chaotic-instability boundary in Eq. (4.8), $r_0/a_0 \gtrsim C_{\rm chaotic}\,(M/(m_1+m_2))^{1/3}$ with $C_{\rm chaotic}\approx 2$--$4$ taken from earlier work, is the correct place where soft binaries cease to be chaotic-stable and start being disrupted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, soft-but-bound binaries on tilted spherical orbits can reach near-unity eccentricity, sharply enhancing gravitational-wave emission and shortening the binary's merger lifetime.
  • The vZLK period dropping to a few outer orbital periods implies that eccentricity peaks could repeat on dynamical timescales rather than the long secular timescale usually assumed.
  • Because the effect grows with black-hole spin and with smaller orbital radius, the most extreme short-period oscillations are expected near the innermost stable spherical orbit of a rapidly spinning supermassive black hole.
  • Some soft binaries with large libration are disrupted rather than merely oscillatory, placing a boundary on which hierarchical triples survive close to the black hole.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the shortened period is generic, repeated gravitational-wave burst trains from such triples could become a distinctive observational signature, though the paper does not compute waveforms.
  • The equal-mass assumption removes the 0.5 post-Newtonian spin-coupling term; unequal-mass binaries could show an additional dependence on mass ratio that the present results do not constrain.
  • The same spin-libration coupling should persist for eccentric or unbound outer orbits, where the paper expects qualitatively different dynamics and explicitly leaves them to future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a local inertial frame in Kerr spacetime via Fermi-Walker transport and derives Newtonian equations of motion for an equal-mass binary whose center of mass follows a spherical geodesic orbit. It then studies von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (vZLK) oscillations as functions of the latitudinal libration angle, binary semi-major axis, orbital radius, and Kerr spin parameter. The main reported findings are that latitudinal libration shortens the vZLK oscillation period and increases the maximum eccentricity, and that for sufficiently soft yet stable binaries the vZLK timescale becomes dynamical, of order several latitudinal libration periods. The appendices provide the general curved-spacetime binary framework, the Carter-tetrad curvature components, and double-averaged analytic solutions for the equatorial case, which are used as a benchmark against the numerical integrations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a genuinely new dynamical regime: binaries orbiting spinning supermassive black holes on tilted spherical orbits could reach near-unity eccentricity and oscillate on timescales of only a few outer orbital periods, with direct implications for gravitational-wave source modeling and the evolution of hierarchical triples in galactic nuclei. The strengths of the paper are the first-principles derivation of the equations of motion, the nontrivial internal consistency check that hard binaries reproduce the double-averaged analytic results, and the explicit closed-form analytic benchmark solutions in Appendix C. The principal risks are that the 'soft yet stable' regime rests on an empirical chaos threshold imported from a different geometry, and that the quantitative extraction of vZLK periods from chaotic time series is not defined or error-controlled; these issues bear directly on the headline claim rather than on the formal derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV.C and §V.B–V.C, Eq. (4.8), Fig. 10] The 'sufficiently soft yet stable' regime on which the headline dynamical-timescale claim rests is delimited by the empirical chaotic-instability criterion Eq. (4.8), with C_chaotic ≈ 2–4 taken from the authors' previous work [63] for a circular equatorial orbit. For the main survey parameters (M = 10^8 M_sun, m1 = m2 = 10 M_sun, r0 = 9M), (M/(m1+m2))^{1/3} ≈ 171; the case a0 = 0.012M, which is presented in the dynamical-vZLK discussion, has r0/a0 = 750, only about 10% above the C_chaotic = 4 threshold (≈684), while the adjacent case a0 = 0.015M falls below the threshold and is reported as broken in Fig. 10. Because the criterion is empirical and was not derived for Kerr spherical orbits with latitudinal libration, a modest increase of C_chaotic (for example to 5) would move the flagship cases to the unstable side. The paper should either justify the transferability of C_chaotic to the present geometry or demonstrate that the qualitative conclusions are insensitive to the threshold value.
  2. [§V.D, Figs. 11–12] The vZLK period TvZLK in the chaotic regime is extracted from irregular time series, but the manuscript does not state the algorithm used (e.g., peak counting, zero crossings, or a windowed spectral estimate), the fitting window, or the uncertainty attached to each reported value. Since the central quantitative statement is that TvZLK becomes 'just several times' the libration period Pζ and that the timescale 'transitions from secular to dynamical', the numerical factor in Figs. 11–12 is not verifiable without a defined estimator. The authors should specify the extraction procedure, provide representative error bars, and report convergence tests with respect to integration tolerance and total integration time.
  3. [§III.A and Appendix A, Eq. (A.7)] The decoupling of the center-of-mass and relative motion in Appendix A requires introducing an acceleration that cancels the 0.5PN interaction term L1/2-int; with that acceleration, R = 0 is an exact solution only for an accelerated, non-geodesic CM trajectory. The numerical model in Section V, however, assumes that the CM follows a prescribed geodesic spherical orbit and does not solve Eq. (A.7) or estimate the resulting correction to the curvature components. The authors should state this as an explicit approximation and quantify its effect on the tidal field and on the vZLK timescales, particularly for the soft binaries where the relative acceleration is largest.
  4. [§V.G, Figs. 15–18] The use of the double-averaged conserved quantities ϑ and CvZLK to characterize chaotic oscillations is invoked as an interpretive tool, but Fig. 18 only shows visually that the eccentricity curve lies between the predicted emax and emin envelopes. No quantitative measure of agreement (e.g., the fraction of time the envelope is violated, or a residual statistic) is provided, even though the DA approximation formally breaks down in the chaotic regime. If this tool is used to support the claim that the chaotic dynamics remains vZLK-like, it needs a quantitative validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the typo 'Cater constants'; it should read 'Carter constants'.
  2. [§IV.C, Eq. (4.8)] The stability criterion is written with ℓ_binary, but the numerical survey reports a0; the authors should clarify that a0 is used as the binary size in the stability ratio and define the relationship between ℓ_binary and a0.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The red 'chaotic stability bound' curve is not defined in the caption; the authors should state which expression is plotted and for which parameter values.
  4. [Abstract and §III] The abstract states that the equations of motion are solved without noting that the numerical analysis is restricted to equal masses; the equal-mass assumption should be stated in the abstract or in the opening of Section V.
  5. [§V.D, Fig. 12] The green dotted line is labeled TvZLK = 5Pζ, but the text refers only to 'several times' the libration period; the authors should state explicitly whether this line is a quantitative boundary or a guide to the eye.
  6. [§V numerical setup] The paper does not state the numerical integrator, the tolerance settings, or the total integration time for each run; a sentence in Section V would help reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the binary EOM are integrated directly and the double-averaged solutions serve only as an independent baseline.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The local inertial frame is constructed explicitly via Fermi-Walker and Killing-Yano transport in Kerr spacetime (Sec. III A), the curvature components are computed in the Carter tetrad and rotated into the non-rotating frame (Sec. III B), and the resulting normalized equations of motion (Sec. IV A) are integrated numerically. The double-averaged Lagrange planetary equations in Appendix C are used as a comparison baseline, and they match the hard-binary numerical results (Figs. 9 and 11), so there is no fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction. The only input inherited from the authors' prior work is the empirical chaotic-instability coefficient C_chaotic ~ 2-4 in Eq. (4.8), which affects which binaries are classified as stable but does not determine the subsequent vZLK eccentricity or period evolution; any uncertainty in that threshold is a correctness or robustness caveat, not a circular construction. Similarly, the identification of T_vZLK in irregular chaotic time series is not described with an explicit algorithm or error estimate, which is a reproducibility concern, but it is not a self-referential reduction of the claimed result to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central contribution is a new application of known tools. The only imported empirical coefficient is C_chaotic; no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The 'dynamical vZLK oscillation' is a label for a regime, not an entity.

free parameters (1)
  • C_chaotic (stability coefficient) = 2 to 4
    Empirical constant in Eq. (4.8) from the authors' previous work [63]; used to select 'soft yet stable' binary parameters that the central claim depends on.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kerr geodesic structure, including Carter constant and Killing-Yano tensor, is valid and is used to construct spherical orbits and tetrads.
    Invoked in Sections II and III A to parameterize spherical orbits and to build Fermi-Walker transported frames.
  • domain assumption A binary can be treated as a Newtonian two-body system in a local inertial frame with tidal curvature coupling to the Riemann tensor.
    Stated in Section III A and Appendix A; validity requires binary size much smaller than curvature radius and much larger than its gravitational radius.
  • ad hoc to paper The binary center of mass follows a prescribed spherical geodesic; the 0.5PN backreaction that couples CM and relative motion is canceled by a chosen acceleration and then neglected in the numerics.
    Appendix A, Eq. (A.7) and Section III C; this decoupling is designed for this paper and is not derived from an external principle.
  • domain assumption The empirical chaotic stability boundary Eq. (4.8) with p=1/3 and C_chaotic ~ 2-4 delimits the stable regime.
    Taken from [63,67,68] in Section IV C; used to label 'sufficiently soft yet stable' binaries.
  • domain assumption Equal-mass, point-mass binaries with no gravitational radiation reaction are sufficient for the claimed vZLK dynamics.
    m1=m2 is set in Section V; GW emission is deferred to future work, which matters when emax approaches unity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai Oscillations of a Binary on a Spherical Orbit around a Rotating Supermassive Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTOI73V4

@misc{pith2026250418934,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai Oscillations of a Binary on a Spherical Orbit around a Rotating Supermassive Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTOI73V4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18934}
}
read the original abstract

We study the dynamics of a binary system orbiting a rotating supermassive black hole (SMBH). Using Fermi-Walker transport, we construct a local inertial reference frame in the Kerr spacetime and set up a Newtonian binary system. Assuming the binary moves on a spherical orbit with constant radius around the black hole, we derive the equations of motion governing its dynamics. We focus on von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai (vZLK) oscillations, which arise when the binary is compact and its initial inclination exceeds a critical angle. In our previous work on a circular orbit in the equatorial plane, we found that for hard binary systems, these oscillations in eccentricity and inclination follow a regular pattern, whereas in soft binaries, they exhibit chaotic behavior with irregular periods and amplitudes, yet remain stable. In this study, we extend our analysis to a spherical orbit in the Kerr background. The libration of the binary's orbit in the latitudinal direction affects the vZLK oscillations: as the libration angle increases, the oscillation period shortens, and the maximum eccentricity grows, particularly when the oscillations become chaotic. Notably, when the binary is sufficiently soft yet remains stable, the oscillation period is reduced to the dynamical timescale rather than the secular timescale. This effect arises due to the interaction between the SMBH spin and the binary's angular momentum. As the Kerr rotation parameter increases or the radius of the spherical orbit decreases, both the enhancement of maximum eccentricity and the reduction in oscillation period become more pronounced.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18934 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Carter constant in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The ISSO radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: The energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) The chaotic stability bound (the red curve) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: vZLK oscillations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Time evolution of the eccentricity (red curve) and the inclination (blue curve). We choose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Time evolution of the eccentricity (red curve) and the inclination (blue curve). We choose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The maximum values of the eccentricity are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The maximum values of the eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The vZLK oscillation period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: We depict the maximum eccentricity (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: The time evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Panel (a) shows the maximum eccentricity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: The time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: The time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: The relativistic correction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: (a) Maximum (solid) and minimum (dashed) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational waves from b-EMRIs: Doppler shift and beaming, resonant excitation, helicity oscillations and self-lensing

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A first-principles Teukolsky model of a binary extreme-mass-ratio inspiral shows Doppler modulation, beaming, self-lensing, helicity-dependent scattering, and SMBH ringdown resonances in the waveform.

  2. Observable signature of magnetic tidal coupling in hierarchical triple systems

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetic tidal fields from a supermassive black hole trigger new orbital resonances in a companion compact binary, boosting eccentricity and altering its gravitational-wave signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [63]

    R. M. Cheng and C. R. Evans, Physical Review D 87 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    This allows us to simplify the equations for analysis

    Double-averaging (DA) approach Rather than directly solving the above Lagrange planetary equations, one possible approach in- volves averaging the perturbed Hamiltonian over two periods: the inner and outer orbital periods, when we are interested in understanding the long- term behavior of the system, particularly phenom- 23 ena like the vZLK mechanism. T...

  3. [2]

    tidal potential

    Analytic solutions of a binary motion in the equatorial plane under DA approximation Here as for a reference solution, we analyze a binary motion in the equatorial plane using DA approximation. Introducing a “tidal potential” by VS ≡ −⟨⟨ ¯H1⟩⟩, we rewrite the above DA planetary equa- tions as ˙e = − √ 1−e2 na2e ∂VS ∂ω , (C.8) ˙I = cosI na2 sinI √ 1−e2 ∂VS...

    work page

  4. [3]

    CvZLK > 0 (rotation)

    work page

  5. [4]

    CvZLK < 0 (libration)

    work page

  6. [5]

    This is possible if 0<C vZLK < 1

    CvZLK > 0 (rotation) In this case, 0 < ξ− < ξ0 < 1 < ξ+. This is possible if 0<C vZLK < 1. We can integrate Eq. (C.12) by use of the elliptic function as ξ0−ξ ξ+−ξ = ξ0−ξ− ξ+−ξ− sn2 β(rot)(˜τ− ˜τ0),k (rot) , where sn(x,k ) is the Jacobi elliptic function sn with the elliptic modulus k, and β(rot) ≡ 12 p 6(ξ+−ξ−) k(rot) ≡ s ξ0−ξ− ξ+−ξ− This solution gives ...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Since 0 <ξ− <ξ + < 1<ξ 0 in this case, we find ξ+−ξ ξ0−ξ = ξ+−ξ− ξ0−ξ− sn2 β(lib)(˜τ− ˜τ+),k (lib) , where β(lib) ≡ 12 p 6(ξ0−ξ−) 26 k(lib) ≡ s ξ+−ξ− ξ0−ξ−

    CvZLK < 0 (libration) The libration oscillations occur when −3 2 <C vZLK < 0, and ϑ< √ 3−√−2CvZLK√ 5 . Since 0 <ξ− <ξ + < 1<ξ 0 in this case, we find ξ+−ξ ξ0−ξ = ξ+−ξ− ξ0−ξ− sn2 β(lib)(˜τ− ˜τ+),k (lib) , where β(lib) ≡ 12 p 6(ξ0−ξ−) 26 k(lib) ≡ s ξ+−ξ− ξ0−ξ− . We then find the evolution of the eccentricity e as e2 = (1−ξ+)(ξ0−ξ−)− (1−ξ0)(ξ+−ξ−)sn2 β(lib)(...

    work page

  8. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al (The Ligo Scientific Collabora- tion & the Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Living Reviews in Relativity 23 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al., SoftwareX 13, 100658 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The Ligo Scientific Collabo- ration & the Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The Ligo Scientific Collabora- tion & the Virgo Collaboration), The Astrophysi- cal Journal 900, L13 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The Ligo Scientific Collabora- tion & the Virgo Collaboration), Physical Review D 103 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The Ligo Scientific Collabora- tion & the Virgo Collaboration), The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters 913, L7 (2021). 27

    2021

  7. [14]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The Ligo Scientific Collabora- tion, the Virgo Collaboration & the KAGRA col- laboration), The Astrophysical Journal 949, 76 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    M. A. S. Martinez, G. Fragione, K. Kremer, S. Chatterjee, C. L. Rodriguez, J. Samsing, C. S. Ye, N. C. Weatherford, M. Zevin, S. Naoz, et al., The Astrophysical Journal 903, 67 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    Gerosa and M

    D. Gerosa and M. Fishbach, Nature Astronomy 5, 749 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    D. C. Heggie, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 173, 729 (1975)

    1975

  11. [18]

    Hut, Astrophys

    P. Hut, Astrophys. J. 403, 256 (1993)

    1993

  12. [19]

    Samsing, M

    J. Samsing, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Astrophys. J. 784, 71 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    R. L. Riddle et al., Astrophys. J. 799, 4 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Antonini, S

    F. Antonini, S. Chattejee, C. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, V. Kalogera, and F. Rasio, Astrophys. J. 816, 2 (2016)

    2016

  15. [22]

    A. P. Stephan, S. Naoz, A. M. Ghez, M. R. Morris, A. Ciurlo, T. Do, K. Breivik, S. Coughlin, and C. L. Rodriguez, Astrophys. J. 878, 58 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    Mapelli, F

    M. Mapelli, F. Santoliquido, Y. Bouffanais, M. Arca Sedda, M. C. Artale, and A. Ballone, Symmetry 13 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Gayathri, I

    V. Gayathri, I. Bartos, Z. Haiman, S. Klimenko, B. Kocsis, S. M´ arka, and Y. Yang, The Astrophys- ical Journal 890, L20 (2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    von Zeipel, Astronomische Nachrichten 183, 345–418 (1910)

    H. von Zeipel, Astronomische Nachrichten 183, 345–418 (1910)

    1910

  19. [26]

    Lidov, Planet

    M. Lidov, Planet. Space Sci. 9, 719 (1962)

    1962

  20. [27]

    Kozai, Astron

    Y. Kozai, Astron. J. 67, 591 (1962)

    1962

  21. [28]

    Shevchenko, The Lidov-Kozai Effect - Applica- tions in Exoplanet Research and Dynamical As- tronomy (Springer, 2017)

    I. Shevchenko, The Lidov-Kozai Effect - Applica- tions in Exoplanet Research and Dynamical As- tronomy (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  22. [29]

    Kimball, C

    C. Kimball, C. Talbot, C. P. Berry, M. Zevin, E. Thrane, V. Kalogera, R. Buscicchio, M. Carney, T. Dent, H. Middleton, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 915, L35 (2021)

    2021

  23. [30]

    S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and N. Yunes, As- trophys. J. 773, 187 (2013b)

    2013

  24. [31]

    S. Naoz, W. Farr, and F. Rasio, Astrophys. J.754, L36 (2012)

    2012

  25. [32]

    Naoz, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics 54, 441 (2016)

    S. Naoz, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics 54, 441 (2016)

    2016

  26. [33]

    S. Naoz, C. M. Will, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, A. Hees, A. M. Ghez, and T. Do, The Astrophysical Jour- nal 888, L8 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    Teyssandier, S

    J. Teyssandier, S. Naoz, I. Lizarraga, and F. A. Rasio, Astrophys. J. 779, 169 (2013)

    2013

  28. [35]

    G. Li, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 1341 (2015)

    2015

  29. [36]

    Will, Phys

    C. Will, Phys. Rev. D 89, 044043 (2014)

    2014

  30. [37]

    Will, Class

    C. Will, Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 244001 (2014)

    2014

  31. [38]

    B. Liu, D. Lai, and Y.-H. Wang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 883, L7 (2019), 1906.07726

    2019 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Liu and D

    B. Liu and D. Lai, Astrophys. J. 924, 127 (2022), 2105.02230

    2022 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Lim and C

    H. Lim and C. L. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064033 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    X. Fang, T. A. Thompson, and C. M. Hirata, The Astrophysical Journal 875, 75 (2019)

    2019

  35. [42]

    Y. Fang, X. Chen, and Q.-G. Huang, The Astro- physical Journal 887, 210 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    Amaro-Seoane, A

    P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Sesana, L. Hoffman, M. Benacquista, C. Eichhorn, J. Makino, and R. Spurzem, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 402, 2308 (2010)

    2010

  37. [44]

    Antonini and H

    F. Antonini and H. Perets, Astrophys. J. 757, 27 (2012)

    2012

  38. [45]

    Hoang and S

    B. Hoang and S. Naoz, Astrophys. J. 852, 2 (2018)

    2018

  39. [46]

    Antonini, S

    F. Antonini, S. Chatterjee, C. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, and B. Pattabiraman, Astrophys. J. 816, 2 (2016)

    2016

  40. [47]

    Meiron, B

    Y. Meiron, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 84, 2 (2017)

    2017

  41. [48]

    Robson, N

    T. Robson, N. Cornish, N. Tamanini, and S. Too- nen, Phys. Rev. D 98, 064012 (2018)

    2018

  42. [49]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Astrophys. J. 878, 75 (2019)

    2019

  43. [50]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, arXiv:1902.08604 [astro-ph.HE] (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Hoang, S

    B.-M. Hoang, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, W. M. Farr, and J. McIver, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L31 (2019)

    2019

  45. [52]

    Emami and A

    R. Emami and A. Loeb, arXiv:1910.04828[astro- ph.GA] (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Gupta, H

    P. Gupta, H. Suzuki, H. Okawa, and K. Maeda, Physical Review D 101 (2020)

    2020

  47. [54]

    Kuntz and K

    A. Kuntz and K. Leyde, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024002 (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    R. S. Chandramouli and N. Yunes, Physical Re- view D 105 (2022)

    2022

  49. [56]

    Suzuki, P

    H. Suzuki, P. Gupta, H. Okawa, and K. Maeda, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.:Letters 486, 1 (2019)

    2019

  50. [57]

    Suzuki, P

    H. Suzuki, P. Gupta, H. Okawa, and K. Maeda, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, 1645 (2020), 2006.11545

    2020 arXiv

  51. [58]

    F. K. Manasse and C. W. Misner, Journal of Mathematical Physics 4, 735 (1963)

    1963

  52. [59]

    A. I. Nesterov, Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, 465 (1999)

    1999

  53. [60]

    Delva and M

    P. Delva and M. C. Angonin, Gen. Rel. Grav. 44, 1 (2012), 0901.4465

    2012 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Banerjee, S

    P. Banerjee, S. Paul, R. Shaikh, and T. Sarkar, Physics Letters B 795, 29 (2019)

    2019

  55. [62]

    Ishii, M

    M. Ishii, M. Shibata, and Y. Mino, Phys. Rev. D 71, 044017 (2005)

    2005

  56. [64]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Serra, and E. Trincherini, Physical Review D 104 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Gorbatsievich and A

    A. Gorbatsievich and A. Bobrik, AIP Conference Proceedings 1205, 87 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Chen and Z

    X. Chen and Z. Zhang, Physical Review D 106, 103040 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Camilloni, G

    F. Camilloni, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, R. Oliveri, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084011 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Maeda, P

    K. Maeda, P. Gupta, and H. Okawa, Phys.Rev.D 107, 124039 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Maeda, P

    K. Maeda, P. Gupta, and H. Okawa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123041 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Zhang and X

    Z. Zhang and X. Chen, The Astrophysical Journal 28 968, 122 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Camilloni, T

    F. Camilloni, T. Harmark, G. Grignani, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531, 1884–1904 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    van de Meent, Class

    M. van de Meent, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 145007 (2020), 1906.05090

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    R. A. Mardling and S. J. Aarseth, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 321, 398 (2001)

    2001

  66. [74]

    Myll¨ ari, M

    A. Myll¨ ari, M. Valtonen, A. Pasechnik, and S. Mikkola, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 476, 830 (2018)

    2018

  67. [75]

    Lithwick and S

    Y. Lithwick and S. Naoz, Astrophys. J. 742, 94 (2011), 1106.3329

    2011 arXiv

  68. [76]

    B. Katz, S. Dong, and R. Malhotra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181101 (2011), 1106.3340

    2011 arXiv

  69. [77]

    S. Naoz, W. M. Farr, Y. Lithwick, F. A. Rasio, and J. Teyssandier, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431, 2155 (2013), 1107.2414

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    G. Li, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 785, 116 (2014), 1310.6044

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    B. Liu, D. J. Mu˜ noz, and D. Lai, mnras 447, 747 (2015), 1409.6717

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Cardoso, F

    V. Cardoso, F. Duque, and G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D 103, L081501 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Shibata, K.-i

    M. Shibata, K.-i. Nakao, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7304 (1994)

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.