Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Black hole absorption cross sections: Spin and Regge poles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a Schwarzschild black hole absorbing massless scalar, electromagnetic, or gravitational waves, this paper derives a closed-form approximation, Eq.

desk verdict A genuinely useful spin-dependent extension of the scalar CAM absorption formula, but the claimed low-frequency validity is not supported and should be walked back. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19324 v2 pith:7V7RNMJE submitted 2025-04-27 gr-qc hep-th

Mohamed Ould El Hadj This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C5783C35 PACS 04.70.-s04.30.-w
keywords blackholeabsorptionReggepolescomplexangularmomentumSchwarzschildcrosssectionphotonspherequasinormalmodesgreybodyfactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the absorption cross section of a Schwarzschild black hole for massless fields of spin $s=0,1,2$ is, for $2M\omega\gtrsim 1$, given by a compact closed form: the geometric capture cross section $\sigma_{\mathrm{geo}}=27\pi M^2$ with a spin-dependent subleading correction, plus an oscillatory Regge-pole term. If true, this formula reproduces the full partial-wave absorption spectra, including both the main oscillations and the fine structure, without solving the radial wave equation mode by mode. The construction splits the cross section into a smooth background, built from real- and imaginary-axis integrals in the complex angular-momentum plane, and a discrete sum over Regge poles that encode surface waves orbiting the photon sphere. A consequence is that electromagnetic and gravitational waves oscillate not around $\sigma_{\mathrm{geo}}$ but around a frequency-dependent background cross section, and the crossing points of total and background align with the real parts of quasinormal-mode frequencies. The payoff is a semiclassical picture of black-hole absorption that connects geometric capture, photon-sphere resonances, and quasinormal modes in one formula.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of Regge poles $\lambda_{n,s}(\omega)$ and residues $\gamma_{n,s}(\omega)$ of the analytically continued greybody factor in the complex angular-momentum plane. The paper computes them with WKB expansions, Eqs. (35)-(36), truncated at increasing order for $s=1$ and $s=2$, and uses an error-function approximation to the greybody factor to evaluate the real-axis background integral in closed form. The Poisson summation formula converts the partial-wave sum into background integrals plus the Regge-pole series; the poles carry the dispersion and damping of photon-sphere surface waves, with real parts tied to quasinormal-mode frequencies and imaginary parts to the Lyapunov exponent of unstable null geodesics. The whole machinery turns a mode-by-mode numerical sum into a few analytic terms.

What would settle it

Compute the exact partial-wave absorption cross section for $s=2$ at $2M\omega\approx0.5$, $1.0$, and $1.5$ by direct numerical integration of the Regge-Wheeler equation, and compare with Eq. (1) combined with the harmonic Regge term, Eq. (39). The paper reports fine-structure residuals up to roughly 21% for $s=2$; if the discrepancy exceeds those claimed residuals by more than numerical error, the claimed low/intermediate-frequency validity collapses. A sharper check is to evaluate the spin-dependent eikonal formula, Eq. (42), at $2M\omega=0.2$, where the WKB phase expansion diverges, and compare it with the exact oscillatory fluctuation defined in Eq. (43).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is Eq. (1): for $2M\omega\gtrsim 1$, $$\sigma_s(\omega) \simeq \sigma_{\mathrm{geo}}\left[1+\frac{(1-6s)(1+6s)}{(54M\omega)^2}\right]+\sigma_{s,\mathrm{RP}}(\omega),$$ with $\sigma_{\mathrm{geo}}=27\pi M^2$. The oscillatory piece is carried by the first Regge pole; in the spin-dependent eikonal approximation, Eq. (42), it reads $$\sigma_{s,\mathrm{RP}}(\omega)=-8\pi $e^{{-\pi}}$\sigma_{\mathrm{geo}}\frac{\sin[2\pi\Theta(\omega)+\delta_s(\omega)]}{2\pi\Theta(\omega)},$$ where $\Theta(\omega)=3\sqrt{3}M\omega$ is the geometric phase accumulated on photon-sphere orbits and $\delta_s(\omega)=\pi[65-72(1-s^2)]/(324\sqrt{3}M\omega)$ is a spin-dependent phase shift. The paper shows by comparison with direct partial-wave integration that this expression, supplemented by higher-order WKB terms and a second harmonic, tracks the exact cross section for $s=0,1,2$ over a wide frequency range. The deeper claim is that the full cross section admits the exact CAM decomposition $\sigma_s=-\sigma_{s,\mathrm{SM}}+\sigma_{s,\mathrm{BRe}}+\sigma_{s,\mathrm{BIm}}+\sigma_{s,\mathrm{RP}}$, in which the real-axis background represents classical geometric propagation, the imaginary-axis background captures subleading tails, and the Regge-pole sum represents interference of surface waves near the photon sphere.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the semiclassical (WKB) expansions of the Regge poles and their residues, truncated at fixed order in $1/(M\omega)$, remain accurate well below the high-frequency regime, down to $2M\omega$ of order one and smaller; if those truncated asymptotics lose accuracy there, the claimed range of validity of Eq. (1) fails even though the high-frequency limit survives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $s=1$ and $s=2$, the high-frequency baseline is not the geometric capture cross section; oscillations sit on the frequency-dependent background $\tilde{\sigma}_{s,\mathrm{BRe}}+\sigma_{s,\mathrm{BIm}}$, so comparing absorption to $27\pi M^2$ misstates the spin-dependent baseline.
  • The crossings between total and background cross sections occur near the real parts of fundamental quasinormal-mode frequencies, with roughly regular spacing $\Delta\omega\approx 1/(3\sqrt{3}M)=2\pi/T_{\mathrm{orb}}$, directly linking the absorption pattern to the photon-sphere orbital period.
  • The spin-dependent eikonal formula of Eq. (42) provides an analytic description of the leading oscillations for all three spins, generalizing the scalar sinc approximation; adding the second harmonic as in Eq. (39) captures the fine structure and beats seen in the exact spectra.
  • For $2M\omega\gtrsim1$ and with the stated truncation orders, Eqs. (1), (39), and (42) replace partial-wave summation as a fast, accurate route to absorption cross sections for scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational fields in Schwarzschild geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the spin phase $\delta_s(\omega)$ and the background baseline both depend on $s$ through $\beta=1-s^2$, the same construction could be inverted to read photon-sphere properties, such as orbital frequency and damping rate, from measured or simulated absorption spectra.
  • Editorial inference: if the CAM decomposition extends to rotating or charged black holes, the frequency-dependent background cross section identified here would be the natural baseline for computing spin-dependent greybody factors in Hawking radiation, a calculation the paper does not perform.
  • Editorial inference: the claimed validity down to $2M\omega\lesssim1$ is strong enough to test as an extrapolation; a direct high-precision comparison at low frequencies would show whether the truncated WKB expansions are genuinely convergent there or merely approximate the oscillations through fortunate cancellation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper applies complex angular momentum (CAM) techniques to the absorption cross section of massless scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational fields by a Schwarzschild black hole. It derives a CAM decomposition into a real-axis background integral, an imaginary-axis background integral, and a Regge pole series, and numerically verifies this decomposition against the partial-wave expansion for spins s=0,1,2. It then constructs an approximate analytic formula, Eq. (1), combining a smooth background with a Regge-pole oscillatory term, and a refined harmonic expansion that captures fine structure. The paper claims the formula is accurate not only at high frequencies but also in intermediate and low-frequency regimes.

Significance. The paper's core content is a useful analytic description of black-hole absorption oscillations: the Regge-pole oscillatory part is grounded in known WKB expansions of poles and residues, the CAM decomposition is carefully tested numerically, and the spin-dependent phase corrections generalize the earlier scalar sinc approximation. If the high-frequency formula were the whole claim, the work would be a solid contribution. However, the central formula is not fully parameter-free, because the smooth background relies on a fitted slope parameter κ_s, and the scalar background is used without derivation. The claimed extension to low frequencies is structurally problematic and needs to be either withdrawn or substantially qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V B and Figs. 5 and 7; Eq. (1)]
  2. [Sec. V A, Eqs. (30)–(32)]
  3. [Eq. (1) vs Sec. V B]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (18) and Sec. V A, Eq. (26)]
  2. [Eq. (39)]
  3. [Eqs. (35)–(36)]
  4. [Sec. VI A]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The smooth background in Eq. (1) is fitted to the exact cross section via kappa_s, so the non-oscillatory envelope is not an independent prediction; only the Regge-pole oscillatory term is independently derived.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V A, Eqs. (30)-(32); validation in Sec. V B, Eq. (38) and Fig. 5]
    "Therefore, we treat kappa_s as an effective fitting parameter, calibrated numerically to optimize agreement with the exact cross section across a broad frequency range. This approach yields a semianalytic fit that retains the correct high-frequency asymptotics while improving accuracy in the transition region."

    The smooth real-axis background entering the central formula Eq. (1)/(38) is not derived from first principles: its slope kappa_s is explicitly calibrated to the exact partial-wave cross section. That fitted background is then inserted into Eq. (38), and the resulting formula is validated against the same exact cross section in Figs. 5-7. The non-oscillatory envelope of the 'prediction' therefore re-imports the fitting target; only the Regge-pole oscillatory term is an independent, WKB-based prediction.

full rationale

I identify one genuine circular step: the real-axis background in the central approximation is a semianalytic fit to the exact absorption cross section, not a derivation, and the same exact data are used to validate the final formula. This is the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. However, the oscillatory Regge-pole term is parameter-free and is grounded in WKB expansions from Decanini et al. [33,48,61], which are external to this paper, so that part is not circular. The numerical-method citations [41,42] are methodological self-citations but not load-bearing: the partial-wave equation is standard and the method is benchmarked against it, so no central claim reduces to those prior papers. The skeptical concern that Eq. (1) diverges as omega -> 0 while the exact cross section is finite is a correctness/validity issue, not circularity, and is therefore not scored here. Score 6 reflects that one component of the central formula is fit to the data it then claims to reproduce, while the oscillatory fine structure retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formulas rest on standard CAM machinery plus three domain assumptions (analytic continuation, vanishing arcs, simple poles). The only fitted free parameter is κ_s, which calibrates the smooth background; this is the main place where the derivation depends on matching the data. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • κ_s (slope parameter) = 3√3/8 for s=1, 3√3/(4√17) for s=2
    Effective fitting parameter in the error-function model (30), calibrated numerically to match the exact cross section, per Sec. V.A around Eq. (31).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Analytic continuation of the greybody factor as Γ(λ−1/2,s)(ω)=T(λ−1/2,s)(ω) times its complex conjugate.
    Prescription from Decanini et al. [32], stated in Eq. (14), used to apply the residue theorem in the CAM plane.
  • standard math Poisson summation formula (half-range version, Eq. (7)) applies to the partial wave expansion.
    Standard identity from Morse and Feshbach [50], invoked in Sec. III to derive the CAM representation.
  • domain assumption Arc contributions at infinity vanish in the contour deformations used for the p>0 and p<0 integrals.
    Assumed in Sec. III around Eq. (13); the paper states this is 'typically justified by exponential damping'.
  • domain assumption The analytically continued greybody factor has only simple Regge poles in the first and fourth quadrants of the CAM plane.
    Needed for the residue series in Eqs. (15) and (21). Standard in the CAM literature.
  • domain assumption Axial and polar gravitational perturbations share identical transmission coefficients due to isospectrality.
    Used in Sec. II to compute the gravitational cross section with a single Regge-Wheeler equation; cited to Chandrasekhar [55,56].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black hole absorption cross sections: Spin and Regge poles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7V7RNMJE

@misc{pith2026250419324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black hole absorption cross sections: Spin and Regge poles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7V7RNMJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19324}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the absorption of massless scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational fields propagating in the Schwarzschild black hole geometry. Using complex angular momentum techniques, we first derive a representation of the absorption cross section that separates it into smooth background integrals and a discrete Regge pole series. This decomposition reveals the physical mechanisms underlying black hole absorption, including classical capture, surface wave interference near the photon sphere, and subleading background effects. We then construct a refined high-frequency analytical approximation that captures both the dominant oscillations and the fine structure of the absorption spectra for scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational fields, incorporating spin-dependent phase corrections and higher-order effects. In addition, we provide a simplified expression that generalizes the sinc approximation to describe the leading oscillations for electromagnetic and gravitational fields. Our analysis offers a unified semiclassical interpretation of black hole absorption, combining geometric optics, surface wave dynamics, and resonant phenomena encoded by the Regge pole structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. CAM-based analysis of the scalar absorption cross section ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. CAM-based analysis of the electromagnetic absorption cross section ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. CAM-based analysis of the gravitational absorption cross section ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. High-frequency behavior of the total absorption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between the total absorption cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Oscillatory fluctuations in the total absorption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Residual fine structure in the absorption cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Singularity

    R. A. Matzner, Scattering of Massless Scalar Waves by a Schwarzschild “Singularity”, J. Math. Phys.9, 163 (1968)

    work page 1968

  2. [2]

    = i 2 eiπ(λ− 1 2) sin π λ− 1 2 ,Imλ>0,(16a) +∞X p=1 e−i2pπ(λ− 1

    work page

  3. [3]

    high-frequency

    =− i 2 e−iπ(λ− 1 2) sin π λ− 1 2 ,Imλ<0,(16b) we obtain σs(ω) =−σ s,SM(ω) + 2π ω2 Z +∞ 0 dλλΓ ℓ,s(ω) −2π ω2 Z +i∞ 0 dλ eiπλ cos [πλ]λΓλ− 1 2,s(ω) −4π2 ω2 Re (+∞X n=1 eiπ(λn,s(ω)− 1 2) sin π λn,s(ω)− 1 2 λn,s(ω)γn,s(ω) ) . (17) We can now express the total absorption cross section in the CAM framework as a sum of distinct contributions σs(ω) =−σ s,SM(ω) +σ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    C. W. Misner, Interpretation of gravitational-wave ob- servations, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 994 (1972)

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    Mashhoon, Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation from a Black Hole, Phys

    B. Mashhoon, Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation from a Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D7, 2807 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Amplification of waves reflected from a rotating ”black hole”., Sov. Phys. JETP37, 28 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys

    R. Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D12, 933 (1975)

    work page 1975

  8. [8]

    L. H. Ford, Quantization of a Scalar Field in the Kerr Space-Time, Phys. Rev. D12, 2963 (1975), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 14, 658 (1976)]

    work page 1975

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    G. W. Gibbons, Vacuum Polarization and the Sponta- neous Loss of Charge by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.44, 245 (1975)

    1975

  2. [10]

    D. N. Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole, Phys. Rev. D13, 198 (1976)

    1976

  3. [11]

    W. G. Unruh, Absorption Cross-Section of Small Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D14, 3251 (1976)

    1976

  4. [12]

    N. G. Sanchez, The black hole : Scatter, absorber and emissor of particles (1978)

    1978

  5. [13]

    N. G. Sanchez, Absorption and Emission Spectra of a Schwarzschild Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D18, 1030 (1978)

    1978

  6. [14]

    S. R. Das, G. W. Gibbons, and S. D. Mathur, Universal- ity of low-energy absorption cross-sections for black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 417 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9609052

    1997 arXiv

  7. [15]

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Universal low- energy dynamics for rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4975 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9702015

    1997 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Black hole grey body factors and d-brane spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D55, 861 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9609026. 16

    1997 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Harmark, J

    T. Harmark, J. Natario, and R. Schiappa, Greybody Fac- tors for d-Dimensional Black Holes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.14, 727 (2010), arXiv:0708.0017 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Higuchi, Low frequency scalar absorption cross- sections for stationary black holes, Class

    A. Higuchi, Low frequency scalar absorption cross- sections for stationary black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 18, L139 (2001), [Addendum: Class.Quant.Grav. 19, 599 (2002)], arXiv:hep-th/0108144

    2001 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kanti and J

    P. Kanti and J. March-Russell, Calculable corrections to brane black hole decay. 1. The scalar case, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024023 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203223

    2002 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kanti and J

    P. Kanti and J. March-Russell, Calculable corrections to brane black hole decay. 2. Greybody factors for spin 1/2 and 1, Phys. Rev. D67, 104019 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0212199

    2003

  13. [21]

    C. M. Harris and P. Kanti, Hawking radiation from a (4+n)-dimensional black hole: Exact results for the Schwarzschild phase, JHEP10, 014, arXiv:hep- ph/0309054

  14. [22]

    Jung and D

    E. Jung and D. K. Park, Effect of scalar mass in the absorption and emission spectra of Schwarzschild black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 3717 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0403251

    2004

  15. [23]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Cavaglia, and L. Gualtieri, Black Hole Particle Emission in Higher-Dimensional Space- times, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 071301 (2006), [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 219902 (2006)], arXiv:hep- th/0512002

    2006

  16. [24]

    E. Jung, S. Kim, and D. K. Park, Low-energy absorp- tion cross section for massive scalar and Dirac fermion by (4+n)-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole, JHEP 09, 005, arXiv:hep-th/0406117

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Jung and D

    E. Jung and D. K. Park, Absorption and emission spectra of an higher-dimensional Reissner-Nordstrom black hole, Nucl. Phys. B717, 272 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0502002

    2005 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Doran, A

    C. Doran, A. Lasenby, S. Dolan, and I. Hinder, Fermion absorption cross section of a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D71, 124020 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0503019

    2005 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Grain, A

    J. Grain, A. Barrau, and P. Kanti, Exact results for evap- orating black holes in curvature-squared lovelock gravity: Gauss-Bonnet greybody factors, Phys. Rev. D72, 104016 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0509128

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    L. C. B. Crispino, E. S. Oliveira, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, Absorption cross section of electromag- netic waves for Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D 75, 104012 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Iqbal and H

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Universality of the hydrodynamic limit in AdS/CFT and the membrane paradigm, Phys. Rev. D79, 025023 (2009), arXiv:0809.3808 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. R. Dolan, E. S. Oliveira, and L. C. B. Crispino, Scat- tering of sound waves by a canonical acoustic hole, Phys. Rev. D79, 064014 (2009), arXiv:0904.0010 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  23. [31]

    L. C. B. Crispino, S. R. Dolan, and E. S. Oliveira, Scatter- ing of massless scalar waves by Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes, Phys. Rev. D79, 064022 (2009), arXiv:0904.0999 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and E. S. Oliveira, Electro- magnetic absorption cross section of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes revisited, Phys. Rev. D80, 104026 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    J. Chen, H. Liao, and Y. Wang, Absorption of mass- less scalar wave by high-dimensional Lovelock black hole, Phys. Lett. B705, 124 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Decanini, G

    Y. Decanini, G. Esposito-Farese, and A. Folacci, Univer- sality of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes, Phys. Rev. D83, 044032 (2011), arXiv:1101.0781 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Decanini, A

    Y. Decanini, A. Folacci, and B. Raffaelli, Fine structure of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 175021 (2011), arXiv:1104.3285 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    C. F. B. Macedo, L. C. S. Leite, E. S. Oliveira, S. R. Dolan, and L. C. B. Crispino, Absorption of planar mass- less scalar waves by Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D88, 064033 (2013), arXiv:1308.0018 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. L. Benone, E. S. de Oliveira, S. R. Dolan, and L. C. B. Crispino, Absorption of a massive scalar field by a charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D89, 104053 (2014), arXiv:1404.0687 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    L. C. B. Crispino, S. R. Dolan, A. Higuchi, and E. S. de Oliveira, Inferring black hole charge from backscat- tered electromagnetic radiation, Phys. Rev. D90, 064027 (2014), arXiv:1409.4803 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    L. C. S. Leite, L. C. B. Crispino, E. S. De Oliveira, C. F. B. Macedo, and S. R. Dolan, Absorption of massless scalar field by rotating black holes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1641024 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    C. L. Benone, E. S. d. Oliveira, L. C. B. Crispino, and S. R. Dolan, Absorption cross section of a massive scalar field by a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole, in14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoret- ical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysi...

    2017

  33. [41]

    L. C. S. Leite, C. L. Benone, and L. C. B. Crispino, Scalar absorption by charged rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044043 (2017), arXiv:1708.03370 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    L. C. S. Leite, S. Dolan, and L. Crispino, C. B., Ab- sorption of electromagnetic plane waves by rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D98, 024046 (2018), arXiv:1805.07840 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Folacci and M

    A. Folacci and M. Ould El Hadj, Regge pole descrip- tion of scattering of scalar and electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D99, 104079 (2019), arXiv:1901.03965 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Folacci and M

    A. Folacci and M. Ould El Hadj, Regge pole description of scattering of gravitational waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D100, 064009 (2019), arXiv:1906.01441 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ould El Hadj and S

    M. Ould El Hadj and S. R. Dolan, Conversion of elec- tromagnetic and gravitational waves by a charged black hole, Phys. Rev. D106, 044002 (2022), arXiv:2106.09731 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ould El Hadj, Scattering and conversion of electro- magnetic and gravitational waves by Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes: The Regge pole description, Phys

    M. Ould El Hadj, Scattering and conversion of electro- magnetic and gravitational waves by Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes: The Regge pole description, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104051 (2023), arXiv:2303.12656 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Heidari, A

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quan- tum gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.47, 101815 (2025), arXiv:2410.08246 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Q. Li, Q. Wang, and J. Jia, On-axis absorption and scat- tering of charged massive scalar waves by Kerr-Newman black-bounce spacetime, (2025), arXiv:2504.00674 [gr- qc]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Andersson, Complex angular momenta and the black hole glory, Class

    N. Andersson, Complex angular momenta and the black hole glory, Class. Quant. Grav.11, 3003 (1994). 17

    1994

  42. [50]

    Decanini and A

    Y. Decanini and A. Folacci, Regge poles of the Schwarzschild black hole: A WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D81, 024031 (2010), arXiv:0906.2601 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Decanini, A

    Y. Decanini, A. Folacci, and B. Raffaelli, Unstable cir- cular null geodesics of static spherically symmetric black holes, Regge poles and quasinormal frequencies, Phys. Rev. D81, 104039 (2010), arXiv:1002.0121 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach,Methods of Theoretical Physics(McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York, 1953)

    1953

  45. [53]

    Mashhoon, Scattering of electromagnetic radiation from a black hole, Phys

    B. Mashhoon, Scattering of electromagnetic radiation from a black hole, Phys. Rev. D7, 2807 (1973)

    1973

  46. [54]

    Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a schwarzschild black hole, Phys

    R. Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D12, 933 (1975)

    1975

  47. [55]

    Sanchez, Absorption and emission spectra of a schwarzschild black hole, Phys

    N. Sanchez, Absorption and emission spectra of a schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D18, 1030 (1978)

    1978

  48. [56]

    Andersson, Scattering of massless scalar waves by a schwarzschild black hole: A phase-integral study, Phys

    N. Andersson, Scattering of massless scalar waves by a schwarzschild black hole: A phase-integral study, Phys. Rev. D52, 1808 (1995)

    1995

  49. [57]

    Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    1983

  50. [58]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A344, 441 (1975)

    1975

  51. [59]

    Folacci and M

    A. Folacci and M. Ould El Hadj, Alternative description of gravitational radiation from black holes based on the Regge poles of theS-matrix and the associated residues, Phys. Rev. D98, 064052 (2018), arXiv:1807.09056 [gr- qc]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Wolfram Research, Inc.,Mathematica, Version 13.0, Champaign, Illinois 2021

    2021

  53. [61]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black-hole normal modes: A wkb approach. i. foundations and application of a higher-order wkb analysis of potential-barrier scattering, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    1987

  54. [62]

    Iyer, Black-hole normal modes: A wkb approach

    S. Iyer, Black-hole normal modes: A wkb approach. ii. schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D35, 3632 (1987)

    1987

  55. [63]

    Decanini, A

    Y. Decanini, A. Folacci, and B. Jensen, Complex angu- lar momentum in black hole physics and the quasinor- mal modes, Phys. Rev. D67, 124017 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0212093

    2003

  56. [64]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D79, 064016 (2009), arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.