Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson Dark Matter from Three Complex Scalars

Koji Tsumura; Riasat Sheikh; Takashi Toma

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson Dark Matter from Three Complex Scalars

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three complex scalars can produce a Z3-stabilized pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter candidate, and new semi-annihilation channels help set its relic abundance.

desk verdict Legitimate new Z3 pNGB dark matter model with semi-annihilation; the missing global-minimum proof is patchable and should not block review. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19886 v2 pith:BIB5BIM4 submitted 2025-04-28 hep-ph

Riasat Sheikh , Takashi Toma , Koji Tsumura This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords pseudo-Nambu-GoldstonebosondarkmatterZ3symmetrysemi-annihilationU(1)gaugerelicabundanceboostedHiggsinvisibledecayperturbativeunitarity

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a dark matter model in which the dark matter candidate is a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) made stable by a residual Z3 symmetry. The setup uses three Standard-Model-singlet complex scalars charged under a dark U(1)_V gauge symmetry, with a softly broken global U(1)_A; this extends the usual Z2 pNGB construction and opens up semi-annihilation processes. The central claim is that a consistent parameter space exists in which the pNGB a_omega reproduces the observed relic abundance through both ordinary annihilation and the new semi-annihilation channels, while direct detection is naturally suppressed by the pNGB cancellation mechanism. The paper checks perturbative unitarity and Higgs invisible decay constraints, and it evaluates the boosted-dark-matter flux, finding it too small for current detectors in the minimal setup.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Z3 clock symmetry in the Higgs basis: after rotating the three scalars by the matrix $R$, the fields $(\Sigma_1, \Sigma_2, \Sigma_3)$ transform under $T_3 = \mathrm{diag}(1, \omega, \omega^2)$, so $\Sigma_1$ is uncharged and $\Sigma_2, \Sigma_3$ carry opposite Z3 charges. The dark matter candidate $a_\omega$ is the dark-CP-odd combination of $\Sigma_2$ and $\Sigma_3^*$, a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson: a scalar whose mass is protected by the soft breaking of a global $\mathrm{U}(1)_A$ and whose derivative interactions suppress low-energy scattering. The argument is carried by the cubic interaction $\kappa_2 (\Sigma_\omega^3 + \Sigma_\omega^{*3} - \Sigma_\omega a_\omega^2 - \Sigma_\omega^* a_\omega^{*2})$ with $\kappa_2 = (m_\Sigma^2 - m_\mathrm{DM}^2)/(2 v_s)$, which generates the semi-annihilation channels, together with the $h_1$-$h_2$ mixing that produces the cancellation of the dark-matter-nucleon amplitude at zero momentum transfer.

What would settle it

Evaluate the scalar potential at the competing stationary point $v_{s1} \neq 0$, $v_{s2} = 0$, $v_{s3} = -v_{s1}$ from Appendix A for a benchmark point and compare it with the equal-VEV vacuum; if the Z3-breaking point is deeper, the $a_\omega$ state is not the ground state and the model's dark-matter conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a pNGB dark matter candidate can be stabilized by a Z3 rather than Z2 symmetry using three complex scalars, without losing the direct-detection protection that makes pNGB models attractive. The mass spectrum contains a complex pNGB $a_\omega$ with $m_a^2 = m_{12}^2$, essentially independent of the quartic couplings, and a Z3-singlet scalar sector that mixes with the SM Higgs. Because the Z3 symmetry permits cubic scalar interactions, the dark matter can undergo semi-annihilation processes $a_\omega a_\omega \to a_\omega^* Z'$ and $a_\omega a_\omega \to \Sigma_\omega^* h_2$, which alter the thermal freeze-out and are forbidden in Z2 models. The paper establishes that for benchmark parameters ($\sin\theta = 0.1$, $\sin\epsilon = 10^{-4}$, $m_2 = 300$ GeV, $m_\Sigma = 3 m_\mathrm{DM}$, $m_{Z'} = 200$ GeV) a relic-abundance curve consistent with $\Omega_\mathrm{DM} h^2 = 0.12 \pm 0.001$ exists, and that perturbative unitarity restricts $m_\mathrm{DM}$ to about 2.5 TeV.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the vacuum in which all three dark scalars get equal background values is the global minimum, but it only checks stationarity and discards a competing vacuum because it breaks the stabilizing Z3 symmetry, without comparing which minimum is deeper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

When $m_\mathrm{DM} > m_{Z'}$, the semi-annihilation process $a_\omega a_\omega \to a_\omega^* Z'$ enhances the annihilation cross section and lowers the relic abundance relative to the Z2 model.
For $m_{Z'}$ close to $m_\mathrm{DM}$ (for example $1.1\, m_\mathrm{DM}$), the relic-density curve drops sharply because both the $Z'Z'$ annihilation channel and the semi-annihilation channel stay kinematically open.
With $m_\Sigma = 1.5\, m_\mathrm{DM}$, a forbidden semi-annihilation-like channel $a_\omega a_\omega \to \Sigma_\omega^* h_2$ becomes active and produces qualitatively different relic-abundance behavior than a Z2 model with the same spectrum.
The benchmark parameter choices leave a viable region below $m_\mathrm{DM} \simeq 2.5$ TeV after perturbative unitarity and Higgs invisible decay constraints, with resonance dips at $m_\mathrm{DM} = m_1/2$ and $m_2/2$ and a kink at $m_\mathrm{DM} = m_{Z'}$.
The boosted-dark-matter elastic cross section in the minimal setup is estimated at $\sim 10^{-54}\,\mathrm{cm}^2$ for a benchmark point, several orders below current and near-future detector sensitivities, so no observable boosted-dark-matter signal is expected without additional boost sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

I infer that the model's most distinctive observable is not the elastic scattering of boosted dark matter but the production of a $Z'$ boson plus missing energy from $a_\omega a_\omega \to a_\omega^* Z'$, since the benchmark elastic cross section is far below reach.
One check the paper leaves open is a direct comparison of the potential depths at the equal-VEV vacuum and the competing Z3-breaking stationary point; until that is done, the stability of $a_\omega$ rests on an unverified global-minimum assumption.
Because the paper notes that $\lambda_S = \lambda'_S$ makes the charged scalars degenerate and could lead to multi-component dark matter, the same three-scalar framework could be pushed toward a two-component scenario; that direction is not developed here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a real extension, not a recycled Z2 pNGB model. Three complex scalars with a residual Z3 and the κ2 cubic terms give semi-annihilation channels that are genuinely absent in the two-scalar model of Ref. [14]. The mass spectrum, cubic vertices, and gauge diagonalization are internally consistent, and the authors are honest that the boosted-DM flux they can produce lies below experimental reach. That last point matters: they don't oversell the BDM motivation.

What the paper does well: the relic-density comparison with the Z2 case (Figs. 3–5) makes the semi-annihilation contribution concrete, including the kink at m_DM = m_Z' and the interesting forbidden-channel behavior for m_Σ = 1.5 m_DM. The parameter space satisfying relic abundance, perturbative unitarity, and Higgs invisible decay is plausible. The perturbative-unitarity matrix and the VEV analysis in Appendix A are presented in enough detail to follow the algebra. The citation pattern is appropriate; it builds on the pNGB program without inflating the novelty.

The largest substantive gap is vacuum stability. Appendix A finds a stationary point (v_s1, 0, −v_s1) that satisfies all minimization equations and discards it because it breaks the residual Z3. That is not a reason; if it were the global minimum, the DM candidate would not be stable. For the benchmark choices the energy comparison almost certainly favors the equal-VEV vacuum: the m_12^2 soft term is positive at the competing point, and m_Σ = 3 m_DM forces λ_S > λ'_S. But the paper should show this explicitly, not assume it. This is a patchable omission, not a fatal one.

Minor reproducibility issue: no model files, scripts, or benchmark tables are provided, so the relic-density curves can't be reproduced without contacting the authors. For a numerical-scan paper, that is worth requesting at review.

Who is this for? People working on pNGB dark matter or semi-annihilation phenomenology. It is a genuine extension with a clear qualitative signature, and the physics looks sound. I would send it to a serious referee, with the global-minimum proof and numerical reproducibility as the main requests.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a dark matter model with three complex scalar fields, a dark U(1)_V gauge symmetry, a softly broken global U(1)_A symmetry, and an exact S(3)/Z3 structure. It derives the scalar mass spectrum, identifies a complex pNGB a_omega as a stable DM candidate, and computes constraints from perturbative unitarity and Higgs invisible decays. Relic abundance contours are obtained with micrOMEGAs, emphasizing new semi-annihilation channels a_omega a_omega -> a*_omega Z' and a_omega a_omega -> Sigma*_omega h2, and the paper closes with an estimate of boosted DM elastic scattering. The central claim is that a viable thermal parameter space exists for this semi-annihilating pNGB DM with naturally suppressed direct detection.

Significance. If the vacuum issue is resolved, the model is a useful minimal realization of semi-annihilating pNGB DM that goes beyond the existing Z2 two-scalar construction: it explicitly derives the Z3 cubic interactions, shows their effect on the relic abundance, and gives a concrete negative estimate of BDM detection prospects. The use of FeynRules and micrOMEGAs makes the numerical results reproducible, and the paper appropriately treats the v/v_s curve as a fitted contour rather than a parameter-free prediction. The missing proof that the equal-VEV vacuum is the global minimum is a clear and likely fixable gap rather than a contradiction in the derivations.

major comments (1)

[Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A] The equal-VEV vacuum <S1>=<S2>=<S3>=vs/sqrt(6) is assumed in Eq. (2.7), but Appendix A explicitly finds a competing stationary point with vs1 != 0, vs2 = 0, vs3 = -vs1 that satisfies the minimization equations (A.2)-(A.5). This point is discarded only because it breaks the residual Z3, and no comparison of potential depths is presented. Since the stability of a_omega, the relic calculation, and the direct-detection cancellation all presuppose that the equal-VEV vacuum is the realized global minimum, the paper should prove, or impose inequalities ensuring, V(equal) <= V(competing) over the entire scanned parameter region, including the m12^2 dependence visible in Appendix A.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.7)] The decay written as h1 -> a_omega a_omega violates Z3 charge conservation, because a_omega carries charge omega so a_omega a_omega has charge omega^2 while h1 is neutral. The correct final state is a_omega a*_omega, and the width for a distinguishable complex-scalar pair is Gamma = kappa^2 beta/(16 pi m1), a factor 2 larger than Eq. (3.7). This should be corrected and the red exclusion regions in Figs. 3-5 regenerated.
[Sec. 4.2 and Fig. 4] The sentence "for mZ' = 1.1 mDM, the forbidden Z'Z' channel remains open" is internally inconsistent: for mZ' = 1.1 mDM the channel a_omega a*_omega -> Z'Z' is kinematically closed (2mZ' > 2mDM), and the semi-annihilation channel is also closed because mZ' > mDM. Please clarify the intended kinematics and identify which curve in Fig. 4 corresponds to this case.
[Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.1)] Because the U(1)_V current couples a_omega only off-diagonally to Sigma_omega, there is no tree-level a_omega-a_omega-Z' vertex. This fact is implicit in Eq. (4.1) and is the reason the Z' portal does not spoil the direct-detection suppression; it should be stated explicitly.
[Sec. 2.1 and Fig. 4] There are small presentation issues: the introduction says "charged under three dark U(1)_V gauge symmetry" instead of "a dark U(1)_V gauge symmetry", and the text refers to a dashed orange curve in Fig. 4 while the caption says dashed yellow. These should be harmonized.
[Fig. 3] The axes are not labeled in the displayed version of Fig. 3; please state explicitly which axis is mDM and which is v/v_s, and note that mZ' and mSigma are fixed as functions of mDM in the benchmark scan.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the relic-density contour is a parameter scan, the Z3 semi-annihilation structure follows from the potential, and the cited direct-detection cancellation is independent support rather than a circular input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained for the paper's actual claims. The model is defined by a scalar potential with exact S(3) and softly broken global symmetries; the equal-VEV vacuum (2.7) is adopted, and the mass spectrum, the cubic semi-annihilation couplings kappa2=(mSigma^2-mDM^2)/(2vs), and the relic-density calculation all follow algebraically from that potential. The relic-abundance contour in figure 3 is obtained by scanning v/vs and mDM with micrOMEGAs and benchmarked against Omega h^2=0.12; this is parameter-space exploration, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, so the 'prediction of viable parameter space' is not circular. The direct-detection cancellation is attributed to ref. [4], whose authors include one of the present authors; however, it is a general, parameter-free property of pNGB dark matter and is independently encoded in the low-momentum scattering structure, so the citation is real evidence rather than a load-bearing self-citation chain. The semi-annihilation channels are a genuine consequence of the Z3 charge assignment and are absent in the Z2 predecessor. The only notable weakness, that appendix A identifies a Z3-breaking stationary point and does not compare potential depths, is a possible gap in proving the global minimum, not a circular reduction: stability is not defined in terms of the relic-density conclusion, and no quoted equation reduces to its own input by construction. Therefore no circularity is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a hand-chosen benchmark parameter set and on the assumption that the symmetric vacuum is the global minimum. The relic density match is obtained by fitting v/v_s, not predicted.

free parameters (6)

v/v_s ratio (or vs) = Scan result; the thick blue line in Fig. 3
Chosen for each mDM to reproduce ΩDM h^2 = 0.12, so it is fitted to the relic abundance constraint.
sinθ = 0.1
Hand-chosen benchmark for the Higgs-singlet mixing angle.
m2 = 300 GeV
Hand-chosen mass of the second CP-even scalar in the benchmark.
mΣ / mDM ratio = 3 (or 1.5 in Fig. 5)
Hand-chosen mass ratio for the dark Higgs relative to DM; affects semi-annihilation kinematics.
mZ' = 200 GeV (or 1.1, 3 times mDM)
Hand-chosen dark gauge boson mass benchmark.
sinϵ = 1e-4
Hand-chosen gauge kinetic mixing angle.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper The equal-VEV configuration (vs1=vs2=vs3) is the realized vacuum.
Appendix A lists a second stationary point with vs2=0 and vs3=-vs1 that also satisfies minimization but is discarded because it breaks the residual Z3; the paper does not prove the symmetric vacuum is the global minimum.
domain assumption Dark CP (Sj -> Sj*) is preserved after spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Invoked in section 2.3 to simplify the mass matrix and to write the pNGB and dark Higgs as separate CP eigenstates.
domain assumption Standard thermal freeze-out cosmology with no additional entropy production.
Used in section 4.2 to compute relic abundance with micrOMEGAs.
standard math The pNGB direct detection cancellation formula of ref [4] applies to this model.
The paper relies on the known cancellation between h1 and h2 exchange at zero momentum transfer; this is a standard result in the pNGB DM literature.

invented entities (3)

Dark gauge boson Z' (U(1)_V)
purpose: Gives mass to the dark vector, mediates annihilation and semi-annihilation, and participates in boosted DM.
The model assigns a mass mZ' and kinetic mixing sinϵ to this new vector, but the benchmark values (mZ' = 200 GeV, sinϵ = 1e-4) yield couplings too small for current or near-future experiments; no unique falsifiable prediction is made.
pNGB dark matter aω
purpose: The stable DM candidate under the residual Z3.
Its direct detection cross section is suppressed by the pNGB mechanism, and the boosted flux is far below detection, so the paper itself provides no observable handle.
Dark Higgs Σω
purpose: Partner scalar that carries Z3 charge and mediates the new cubic semi-annihilation vertices κ2.
Its mass ratio to mDM is a free parameter; no direct search signature is analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson Dark Matter from Three Complex Scalars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BIB5BIM4

@misc{pith2026250419886,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone-boson Dark Matter from Three Complex Scalars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BIB5BIM4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19886}
}

abstract

This study explores a dark matter model in which a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson arises as a viable dark matter candidate from the spontaneous and soft breaking of global $\mathrm{U}(1)$ symmetries and stabilized by a residual $\mathbb{Z}_3$ discrete symmetry. The model introduces three complex scalar fields, singlets under the Standard Model gauge group, and charged under a dark $\mathrm{U}(1)_V$ gauge symmetry together with a permutative exchange symmetry among three scalars. These features naturally suppress the dark matter--nucleon scattering cross section by its Nambu-Goldstone boson nature. In addition to conventional annihilation channels, the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ structure allows semi-annihilation processes, playing a crucial role in setting the relic abundance.We analyze theoretical and experimental constraints, including relic abundance, Higgs invisible decays, and perturbative unitarity, and evaluate the elastic scattering cross section for boosted dark matter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

S-matrix bootstrap bounds on self-interacting dark matter
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Weakly coupled scalar self-interacting dark matter cannot be heavier than ~0.3 GeV (generic) or ~MeV (derivative-coupled pNGB), much tighter than the 12 GeV unitarity bound.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[14]

T. Abe, Y. Hamada and K. Tsumura,A model of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with two complex scalars, JHEP 05 (2024) 076 [2401.02397]

arXiv 2024
[1]

PandaX-4Tcollaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 261802 [2107.13438]

arXiv 2021
[2]

LZ collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041002 [2207.03764]

arXiv 2023
[3]

XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041003 [2303.14729]

arXiv 2023
[4]

Gross, O

C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma,Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 191801 [1708.02253]

arXiv 2017
[5]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 14 –

arXiv 2020
[6]

Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys

D. Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 095036 [1901.09751]

arXiv 2019
[7]

Y. Abe, T. Toma and K. Tsumura,Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from gauged U(1)B−L symmetry, JHEP 05 (2020) 057 [2001.03954]

arXiv 2020

Show all 40 references

[8]

Okada, D

N. Okada, D. Raut and Q. Shafi,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in a gaugedB−L extended standard model, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 055024 [2001.05910]

2021 arXiv
[9]

Y. Abe, T. Toma, K. Tsumura and N. Yamatsu,Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model inspired by grand unification, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 035011 [2104.13523]

2021 arXiv
[10]

Okada, D

N. Okada, D. Raut, Q. Shafi and A. Thapa,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095002 [2105.03419]

2021 arXiv
[11]

Abe and Y

T. Abe and Y. Hamada,A model of pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone dark matter from a softly broken SU(2) global symmetry with a U(1) gauge symmetry, PTEP 2023 (2023) 033B04 [2205.11919]

2023 arXiv
[12]

D.-Y. Liu, C. Cai, X.-M. Jiang, Z.-H. Yu and H.-H. Zhang,Ultraviolet completion of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with a hidden U(1) gauge symmetry, JHEP 02 (2023) 104 [2208.06653]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Otsuka, T

H. Otsuka, T. Shimomura, K. Tsumura, Y. Uchida and N. Yamatsu, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from non-Abelian gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 115033 [2210.08696]

2022 arXiv
[15]

Abe and K

T. Abe and K. Ichiki,Tiny yet detectable WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 055025 [2411.15755]

2025 arXiv
[16]

Abe, G.-C

S. Abe, G.-C. Cho and K. Mawatari,Probing a degenerate-scalar scenario in a pseudoscalar dark-matter model, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 035023 [2101.04887]

2021 arXiv
[17]

Abe and T

Y. Abe and T. Toma,Direct detection of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with light mediator, Phys. Lett. B822 (2021) 136639 [2108.10647]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Cai, Y.-P

C. Cai, Y.-P. Zeng and H.-H. Zhang,Cancellation mechanism of dark matter direct detection in Higgs-portal and vector-portal models, JHEP 01 (2022) 117 [2109.11499]

2022 arXiv
[19]

Cho and C

G.-C. Cho and C. Idegawa,Analyzing cancellation mechanism of the dark matter-quark scattering in a complex singlet extension of the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 994 (2023) 116320 [2304.10096]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Maji, W.-I

R. Maji, W.-I. Park and Q. Shafi,Gravitational waves from walls bounded by strings in SO(10) model of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter, Phys. Lett. B845 (2023) 138127 [2305.11775]

2023 arXiv
[21]

Aoki and T

M. Aoki and T. Toma,Simultaneous detection of boosted dark matter and neutrinos from the semi-annihilation at DUNE, JCAP 02 (2024) 033 [2309.00395]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Toma,Distinctive signals of boosted dark matter from its semiannihilation, Phys

T. Toma,Distinctive signals of boosted dark matter from its semiannihilation, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 043007 [2109.05911]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Miyagi and T

T. Miyagi and T. Toma,Semi-annihilating dark matter coupled with Majorons, JHEP 07 (2022) 027 [2201.05412]. – 15 –

2022 arXiv
[24]

Betancourt Kamenetskaia, M

B. Betancourt Kamenetskaia, M. Fujiwara, A. Ibarra and T. Toma,Boosted dark matter from semi-annihilations in the galactic center, Phys. Lett. B864 (2025) 139425 [2501.12117]

2025 arXiv
[25]

Georgi,Lie Algebras In Particle Physics : from Isospin To Unified Theories, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2000), 10.1201/9780429499210

H. Georgi,Lie Algebras In Particle Physics : from Isospin To Unified Theories, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2000), 10.1201/9780429499210

2000 doi
[26]

B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker,Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1519

1977
[27]

ATLAScollaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B842 (2023) 137963 [2301.10731]

2023 arXiv
[28]

CMS collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 933 [2303.01214]

2023 arXiv
[29]

Hambye,Hidden vector dark matter, JHEP 01 (2009) 028 [0811.0172]

T. Hambye,Hidden vector dark matter, JHEP 01 (2009) 028 [0811.0172]

2009 arXiv
[30]

D’Eramo and J

F. D’Eramo and J. Thaler,Semi-annihilation of Dark Matter, JHEP 06 (2010) 109 [1003.5912]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Alloul, N.D

A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250 [1310.1921]

2014 arXiv
[32]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml et al., micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun.299 (2024) 109133 [2312.14894]

2024 arXiv
[33]

DUNE collaboration, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics, 2002.03005

2002
[34]

DUNE collaboration, Prospects for beyond the Standard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 322 [2008.12769]

2021
[35]

Paschos and J.Y

E.A. Paschos and J.Y. Yu,Neutrino interactions in oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 033002 [hep-ph/0107261]

2002 arXiv
[36]

Berger, Y

J. Berger, Y. Cui, M. Graham, L. Necib, G. Petrillo, D. Stocks et al.,Prospects for detecting boosted dark matter in DUNE through hadronic interactions, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 095012 [1912.05558]

2021 arXiv
[37]

Hoefken Zink, S

J. Hoefken Zink, S. Hor and M.E. Ramirez-Quezada,Dark matter interactions in white dwarfs: A multi-energy approach to capture mechanisms, JHEP 05 (2025) 160 [2410.13908]

2025 arXiv
[38]

Fermi-LAT collaboration, Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 231301 [1503.02641]

2015 arXiv
[39]

Chu and C

X. Chu and C. Garcia-Cely,Core formation from self-heating dark matter, JCAP 07 (2018) 013 [1803.09762]

2018 arXiv
[40]

Kamada, H.J

A. Kamada, H.J. Kim, H. Kim and T. Sekiguchi,Self-Heating Dark Matter via Semiannihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 131802 [1707.09238]. – 16 –

2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

T. Abe, Y. Hamada and K. Tsumura,A model of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with two complex scalars, JHEP 05 (2024) 076 [2401.02397]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

PandaX-4Tcollaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 261802 [2107.13438]

arXiv 2021

[3] [2]

LZ collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041002 [2207.03764]

arXiv 2023

[4] [3]

XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 041003 [2303.14729]

arXiv 2023

[5] [4]

Gross, O

C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma,Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 191801 [1708.02253]

arXiv 2017

[6] [5]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 14 –

arXiv 2020

[7] [6]

Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys

D. Karamitros,Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 095036 [1901.09751]

arXiv 2019

[8] [7]

Y. Abe, T. Toma and K. Tsumura,Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from gauged U(1)B−L symmetry, JHEP 05 (2020) 057 [2001.03954]

arXiv 2020