Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Quasi-normal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quark-star f-mode frequencies follow a near-universal linear scaling with the square root of average density, with pressure anisotropy shifting the slope and intercept.

desk verdict First full-GR f-mode relations for anisotropic quark stars, but the solver is a black box; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20589 v1 pith:HA73PO4D submitted 2025-04-29 gr-qc

Sushovan Mondal , Manjari Bagchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords anisotropicquarkstarsf-modeoscillationsfullgeneralrelativityMITbagequationofstateEOS-AHorvatanisotropyquasi-universalrelationsgravitational-waveasteroseismology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the fundamental non-radial oscillation mode (f-mode) of quark stars in full general relativity obeys a simple scaling: the frequency is nearly linear in the square root of the star's average density, with the strength and sign of internal pressure anisotropy changing the slope and intercept. The authors solve the anisotropic Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations for two quark-matter equations of state (the MIT bag model and the interacting EOS-A), then compute l=2 f-mode frequencies and damping times using a full-GR perturbation solver developed in their earlier neutron-star paper. They find frequencies of about 1.3--2.3 kHz for the MIT bag EOS and 1.8--3.4 kHz for EOS-A, with damping times from 60 to 900 ms. They also find that the inverse normalized damping time $R^4/(T M^3)$ falls linearly with compactness $M/R$, and they package both trends into semi-empirical formulas with cubic and quartic dependence on the anisotropy parameter. If right, the same quasi-universal relations known for neutron stars extend to quark stars, giving gravitational-wave astronomers a way to estimate mass, radius, and anisotropy from a measured f-mode.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the two quark-matter equations of state, the Horvat ansatz for pressure anisotropy, and the full-GR f-mode solver carried over from the authors' earlier neutron-star work. The MIT bag EOS is $p_r = (1/3)(\rho - 4B)$ with $B=56$ MeV fm$^{-3}$; EOS-A comes from a relativistic Hartree-Fock calculation with a modified Richardson potential and density-dependent quark masses. Anisotropy is imposed as $\chi = \tau p_r \mu$, with $\mu = 2m/r$ the local compactness, so the anisotropy vanishes at the center and in the Newtonian limit. The complex mode frequency $\omega$ enters through $F = \mathrm{Re}(\omega)/(2\pi)$ and $T = 1/\mathrm{Im}(\omega)$, and the numerical machinery solves the linearized Einstein equations on the anisotropic background to produce the frequencies and damping times that are then fit to the two scaling relations. That machinery is doing all the work: the paper's conclusions ride on its accuracy.

What would settle it

Recompute the f-mode frequency and damping time for a fixed stable configuration, say a 1.4 $M_\odot$ MIT-bag quark star with $\tau=1$, using an independent full-GR perturbation code or a time-domain gravitational-wave extraction, and compare with the prediction of Eq. (8) plus Tables I and II. A deviation larger than the reported fit residuals would falsify the claimed scaling; likewise, computing a configuration with $\tau$ outside the fitted ranges and checking whether the cubic polynomial for $C(\tau)$ still predicts the numerical frequency would settle whether the relation is genuinely universal rather than a fit artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that anisotropy enters the f-mode signature of quark stars in a structured, predictable way. For both equations of state, the f-mode frequency $F$ satisfies $F(M,R,\tau) \approx C(\tau) \sqrt{3M/(4\pi R^3)} + D(\tau)$, where $\tau$ is the dimensionless Horvat anisotropy strength and $C(\tau)$, $D(\tau)$ are well described by cubic polynomials; the coefficient of determination is above 0.997. The inverse normalized damping time $R^4/(T M^3)$ is linear in compactness $M/R$, with slope $J(\tau)$ and intercept $K(\tau)$ fitted to quartic polynomials ($R^2 \approx 0.999$ and 0.987 for the two EOSs). The sign of anisotropy matters physically: positive $\tau$ (tangential pressure greater than radial) raises the frequency for low and intermediate masses and shortens the damping time, while strongly negative $\tau$ can make the frequency fall with mass and lengthen damping dramatically. The paper thus claims that the neutron-star quasi-universal f-mode scaling survives in quark stars and carries an anisotropy fingerprint.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's numbers all depend on the assumption that the full-general-relativity f-mode solver developed in the authors' earlier neutron-star paper is accurate for anisotropic quark stars with the Horvat ansatz; the perturbation equations, boundary conditions, and test-case checks are not reproduced here, so if that solver is wrong or does not carry over, every frequency, damping time, and fitted coefficient in this paper would be invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measured f-mode frequency and damping time from a quark-star candidate could be fed into the paper's formulas to estimate mass, radius, and anisotropy strength directly.
  • The two equations of state occupy distinct bands, 1.3--2.3 kHz versus 1.8--3.4 kHz, so a future gravitational-wave detection could help discriminate non-interacting from interacting quark matter.
  • The damping-time difference between positive and negative anisotropy, up to roughly a factor of two to three at fixed mass, provides a potential observable probe of whether tangential pressure exceeds radial pressure inside the star.
  • The fit quality above $R^2 \approx 0.99$ suggests the relations are tight enough to use as practical asteroseismology tools rather than rough order-of-magnitude estimates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fitting procedure could be applied to other quark-matter EOSs to test whether the coefficients $C(\tau)$ and $D(\tau)$ themselves depend on EOS parameters such as the bag constant or interaction strength; if they cluster, the relation might be even more universal than the paper claims.
  • Because the paper finds that configurations with $\tau > 1$ become unphysical through negative tangential sound speed, astrophysical applications should probably restrict the fitted relations to $\tau \le 1$, a limitation not emphasized in the body of the paper.
  • If future work maps the anisotropy parameter $\tau$ to microphysical sources such as viscosity or magnetic fields, the observed sign-dependent frequency shifts could indirectly constrain those interior properties.
  • The scaling $F \propto \sqrt{M/R^3}$ suggests a possible route to extending these relations to rotating or post-merger remnants, but that extension remains speculative and is not tested here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies quadrupole (l=2) f-modes of non-rotating, anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity, using the Horvat ansatz for pressure anisotropy and two quark-matter equations of state: the MIT bag model and the interacting Dey-Bagchi EOS-A. Static configurations are obtained from the modified TOV equations and restricted to configurations with ∂M/∂ρ_c > 0 and non-negative tangential sound speed squared. The complex f-mode eigenfrequencies are computed with the numerical framework developed in the authors' earlier neutron-star paper (Paper-I), and are converted to frequency F = Re(ω)/(2π) and damping time T = 1/Im(ω). The central claims are: (i) F is approximately linear in the square root of the mean density, with slope C(τ) and intercept D(τ) that depend on the anisotropy parameter τ (Eqs. (8) and (10)), fitted as cubic polynomials in τ; (ii) the normalized inverse damping time R⁴/(TM³) is linear in compactness M/R, with slope J(τ) and intercept K(τ) fitted as quartic polynomials (Eq. (9)); and (iii) various monotonic and threshold-crossing trends of F and T with mass and τ hold for both EOSs. All final expressions are explicitly presented as semi-empirical fits calibrated to the authors' own numerical data; the perturbation equations, boundary conditions, and solver validation are deferred to Paper-I.

Significance. If the underlying complex-frequency calculations are correct, this paper extends the well-known quasi-universal f-mode scaling relations from isotropic neutron stars to anisotropic quark stars, using full general relativity rather than the Cowling approximation employed in earlier anisotropic quark-star studies. The two-EOS comparison (non-interacting MIT bag versus interacting EOS-A) and the physically motivated stability restrictions on the tangential sound speed give the study a clear scope, and the paper is commendably explicit that its final expressions are semi-empirical fits rather than derivations. The resulting relations (10) and (9), with the fitted coefficients in Tables I–IV, are falsifiable in the sense that future gravitational-wave observations of f-modes could test them, and they provide a practical mapping from (M, R, τ) to (F, T) for two benchmark EOSs. The quantitative impact is, however, conditional on verification of the inherited complex-frequency solver, which is not demonstrated in this manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [III (first paragraph); IV (Tables I–IV)] Every reported value of F and T, and therefore every fitted coefficient in Tables I–IV, inherits the numerical complex eigenfrequency ω, but the perturbation equations, boundary conditions, and surface junction conditions are not reproduced here: §III states only that the authors 'use the analytical expressions presented in Paper-I, as well as exactly same numerical techniques.' This deferral is particularly consequential for the MIT bag EOS, whose surface has p_r = 0 at a finite energy density ρ = 4B (Eq. (3)), i.e., a genuine density discontinuity that must be handled in the matching to the outgoing-wave exterior. I therefore ask for a benchmark of the τ = 0 sequences against existing full-GR quark-star f-mode results (e.g., Sotani & Harada, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024019 (2003); Kojima & Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 801 (2002)), together with a grid-convergence statement for Re(ω) and Im(ω); the manuscript's central scaling claims cannot be assessed without it.
  2. [II.C; III.A; IV.A] The selection of 'stable' configurations entering the fits is not unambiguous: §II.C defines two different boundaries (∂M/∂ρ_c = 0 and v_st² ≥ 0), but §IV.A says only that the fits cover 'a range of stable quark star masses, from 0.8 M_⊙ to the maximum stable mass' without stating which boundary is applied for each τ. Since the f-mode frequency tends to zero as a stellar model approaches the radial stability limit, the inclusion or exclusion of near-maximum-mass models materially affects both the claimed 'rapid growth for massive quark stars' and the fitted coefficients in Tables I–IV; please specify the criterion per τ and, ideally, show the sensitivity of the fits to dropping the outermost model.
  3. [IV.A, Eq. (13); IV.B] The reported coefficients of determination (0.9971 and 0.9972 for the frequency relations, 0.9988 and 0.9869 for the damping-time relations) are presented without stating which quantity enters Eq. (13): it is not clear whether R² measures the full two-stage expressions (10)–(12) and (9), (14)–(15) against all individual numerical values, or only the intermediate polynomial fits of C, D, J, K versus τ. Moreover, no numerical uncertainty is quoted for any individual F or T, so the scatter about the linear relations in Figs. 4 and 7 cannot be judged; for the EOS-A damping-time fit, R² = 0.9869 is noticeably lower and the authors should show whether the residuals are systematic (e.g., curvature) or random. Please specify the number of models per τ and give residual statistics.
  4. [Abstract; IV.A; V] The manuscript is honest that the final expressions are semi-empirical, but the linear F–√ρ_avg relation and the polynomial forms for C, D, J, K are all chosen after inspecting and using the same numerical data; consequently, the verbs 'confirm' (abstract and §V) and the implied predictive scope of Eqs. (10) and (9) exceed what an in-sample calibration demonstrates. A simple holdout test (e.g., fitting the relations on one half of the mass range and evaluating the prediction on the other half) or a statement of the typical residual (in kHz and ms) would quantify the predictive content and is, in my view, necessary before the relations are recommended for asteroseismological use.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract vs. V] The conclusion states the f-mode frequency range as 1.3–3.5 kHz, while the abstract and §III state 1.3–2.3 kHz for the MIT bag EOS and 1.8–3.4 kHz for EOS-A; please reconcile the 3.4 versus 3.5 discrepancy.
  2. [Eq. (10) and Tables I–II] Equation (10) mixes units implicitly: a reader cannot evaluate C(τ)√(3M/(4πR³)) unless told that M is in M_⊙, R is in km, and the coefficients in Tables I–IV are expressed in kHz per √(M_⊙/km³) and kHz; please state the units explicitly next to Eqs. (10) and (9).
  3. [IV.A vs. Figs. 4–7] The text in §IV.A says the EOS-A fits use τ in the range −2 to 1.6, but Fig. 4 (right panel) and Fig. 7 (right panel) show sequences for τ = 2; please clarify whether τ = 2 models enter any of the fits or appear only in the figures.
  4. [II.C] The phrase 'the maximum stable mass decreases as the square of the tangential sound speed becomes negative' is imprecise; the models become unstable when v_st² < 0, and the wording should be corrected to say that the stable maximum mass is reduced by that instability condition.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical errors, including 'In the present, we extend' in §I, 'with using the MIT bag EOS' in the captions of Figs. 1 and 2, and inconsistent capitalization; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  6. [VI. Data availability] Since the paper's quantitative output consists of numerical eigenvalue sequences and fitted relations, the authors should consider providing the F and T values for every model as supplementary tables or machine-readable data files, rather than only 'on reasonable request,' to allow independent verification of the fits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling laws are openly semi-empirical fits to the authors' own numerical data, and the inherited Paper-I solver is an independent computational method rather than a self-referential input.

full rationale

The central claimed relations, Eq. (8) and Eq. (9), are explicitly labeled semi-empirical. In Sec. IV the paper states that C(tau) and D(tau) are the slope and intercept of a linear fit between the numerically computed f-mode frequency F and sqrt(3M/(4 pi R^3)), and that J(tau) and K(tau) are the slope and intercept of a linear fit between (T M^3/R^4)^{-1} and compactness M/R. These coefficients are then themselves fit as polynomials in tau, with R^2 values reported. No fitted quantity is renamed as an independent prediction; the paper presents the expressions as convenient approximations valid within the fitted parameter range. The scaling statement about anisotropy affecting the slope and intercept is therefore a description of the fits, not a first-principles derivation, and cannot be circular in the sense of Eq. X being equivalent to Eq. Y by construction. The only self-citation is the use of Paper-I's analytical perturbation expressions and numerical techniques for solving the full-GR f-mode problem. This is a methodological dependency, not a circular reduction: Paper-I's solver was developed for anisotropic neutron stars and does not presuppose the quark-star scaling relations reported here, so the eigenvalues and damping times computed in the present paper are new outputs rather than restatements of the cited work. The absence of an in-manuscript re-validation of the solver for quark-star surface discontinuities is a legitimate correctness and validation concern, but it does not make the argument circular. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited from the text, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central relations rest on two EOS inputs, one phenomenological anisotropy ansatz with a free strength tau, and a large set of fitted coefficients (18 total) calibrated to the authors' own numerical solutions. No new physical entities are introduced. The leading model uncertainty is the Horvat ansatz plus the deferred solver from Paper-I.

free parameters (5)
  • Anisotropy strength tau = -2 to 2 (fits use -2 to 1.8 for MIT, -2 to 1.6 for EOS-A)
    Free parameter in the Horvat ansatz chi = tau p_r mu, chosen by hand to explore the model space; all quantitative results depend on it.
  • C(tau) polynomial coefficients c0-c3 = MIT: 121.1240, 18.4186, -2.1998, 13.1095; EOS-A: 87.8584, 12.3431, -6.7491, 28.0644 (Table I)
    Fitted linear-in-sqrt-density slopes for each tau, then cubic fits in tau.
  • D(tau) polynomial coefficients d0-d3 = MIT: -0.1817, -0.1777, 0.0261, -0.1995; EOS-A: 0.5130, -0.0936, 0.1472, -0.7172 (Table II)
    Intercepts of F versus sqrt(average density) fits, then cubic fits in tau.
  • J(tau) polynomial coefficients j0-j4 = MIT: -175.9430, 15.0989, -3.5854, 1.4289, -0.3524; EOS-A: -171.4760, -8.1686, -2.6170, 5.9472, 2.1901 (Table III)
    Slopes of (R^4/T M^3) versus M/R fits, then quartic fits in tau.
  • K(tau) polynomial coefficients k0-k4 = MIT: 45.1012, 5.4740, 0.2597, -0.2780, -0.0175; EOS-A: 43.7257, 8.6682, 0.2338, -0.8676, -0.3018 (Table IV)
    Intercepts of (R^4/T M^3) versus M/R fits, then quartic fits in tau.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Horvat ansatz chi = tau p_r mu with a global tau describes the anisotropy of quark star matter.
    Adopted in Section II B from Horvat et al.; there is no microphysical derivation forcing this form for quark stars.
  • domain assumption The MIT bag model with B = 56 MeV/fm^3 and EOS-A with parameters (Lambda' = 350 MeV, N = 3.0, alpha0 = 0.55, MQ = 325 MeV) represent quark matter.
    Inputs from prior literature (Sections II A1 and II A2); results are conditional on these equations of state.
  • domain assumption The f-mode perturbation equations and numerical solver from Paper-I are accurate and applicable to anisotropic quark stars.
    Invoked in Section III, first paragraph; the equations are not reproduced in this paper, and the assumption is load-bearing.
  • standard math The standard TOV equations with anisotropy and the adopted stability criteria (dM/drho_c = 0 and v_st^2 >= 0) define physical equilibrium sequences.
    Used in Section II C to select stable models; standard but restricts the parameter range.
  • ad hoc to paper Polynomial forms (cubic for C and D; quartic for J and K) sufficiently capture the tau-dependence of the fit parameters.
    Chosen in Section IV based on the shape of the numerical points; no theoretical reason is given for these degrees.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasi-normal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HA73PO4D

@misc{pith2026250420589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasi-normal f-modes of anisotropic quark stars in full general relativity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HA73PO4D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20589}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate f-mode oscillations of anisotropic quark stars within the framework of full general relativity. We consider two different equations of state (EOSs), one is the MIT bag model EOS and the other is EOS-A. Our study examines the impact of the pressure anisotropy on the equilibrium structure, as well as on the frequencies and damping times of f-mode oscillations. Our results confirm that the f-mode frequency scales linearly with the square root of the average density, with anisotropy influencing both the slope and intercept of this relation. The dependence of the f-mode frequency on total mass reveals distinct trends based on the relative dominance of tangential and radial pressure. When the tangential pressure exceeds the radial pressure, the frequency increases with mass, exhibiting rapid growth for massive quark stars. When the radial pressure dominates, the frequency increases with mass; however, in cases where the radial pressure is significantly greater than the tangential pressure, the frequency decreases as mass increases. For low-mass quark stars, stronger tangential pressure leads to an increase in frequency, while beyond a threshold mass, a further increase in tangential pressure results in a decrease in frequency. For the chosen range of anisotropic strengths, the frequency varies between 1.3 kHz and 2.3 kHz for the MIT bag EOS and between 1.8 kHz and 3.4 kHz for EOS-A. We find that the normalized damping time follows a linear trend with compactness. For a fixed stellar mass, an increase in tangential pressure relative to radial pressure reduces the damping time, whereas a decrease in tangential pressure significantly increases it. The damping time ranges from 83 ms to 900 ms for the MIT bag EOS and from 60 ms to 761 ms for EOS-A. We present semi-empirical expressions for both the frequency and damping time as functions of mass, radius, and anisotropic strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20589 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Mass-Radius profiles for stable anisotropic quark stars with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The variation of the square root of the average density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The variation of the inverse normalized damping time ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The variation of the damping time with mass of quark stars for various values of the anisotropic strength for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The variation of the damping time with the anisotropic strength for quark stars of fixed masses for MIT bag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Examining the influence of anisotropy on the fundamental mode of nonradial oscillation in neutron stars on a complete general relativistic scheme

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pressure anisotropy in strange quark stars measurably changes the f-mode oscillation frequency and the dimensionless tidal deformability, with positive anisotropy increasing mass and deformability while lowering the f...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    In this framework, all three flavors of quarks (up, down, and strange quarks) are treated as non-interacting particles confined within a hypothetical bag

    Noninteracting Quark Matter The simplest EOS for quark stars is provided by the MIT bag model. In this framework, all three flavors of quarks (up, down, and strange quarks) are treated as non-interacting particles confined within a hypothetical bag. The radial pressure in this model is expressed as: pr =−B + X i=u,d,s pi, (1) where pi denotes the pressure...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [57], later improved by Bagchi et al

    Interacting Quark Matter A family of alternative EOSs for strange quark matter is given by Dey et al. [57], later improved by Bagchi et al. [58]. These EOSs are derived using a relativistic Hartree- Fock calculation for strange quark matter, incorporating a modified form of the phenomenological inter-quark in- teraction known as the Richardson potential [...

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is clearly visible from the right panel of Fig

    Conversely, as τ decreases from 0 to −1, the f-mode frequency decreases by 7.72% for a 0.8 M⊙ star and by 9.14% for a 1 M⊙ star. It is clearly visible from the right panel of Fig. 6. From right panel of Fig. 6, we also note that for a 1.53 M⊙ quark star, the frequency initially drops by ap- proximately 3.3% as τ changes from 0 to 0 .2, before in- creasing...

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, Cosmic Rays from Super- Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20, 259 (1934)

    work page 1934

  5. [5]

    Baade and F

    W. Baade and F. Zwicky, On Super-Novae, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20, 254 (1934)

    work page 1934

  6. [6]

    Hewish, S

    A. Hewish, S. J. Bell, J. D. H. Pilkington, P. F. Scott, and R. A. Collins, Observation of a rapidly pulsating radio source, Nature 217, 709 (1968)

    work page 1968

  7. [7]

    M. C. Miller, Astrophysical Constraints on Dense Mat- ter in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 461, 1 (2020), arXiv:1312.0029 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, The Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1804 (1998), arXiv:nucl- th/9804027

    arXiv 1998

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. As- trophys. 380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

    2001 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. D. Swesty, A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter, Nuclear Physics A 535, 331 (1991)

    1991

  3. [11]

    J. M. Lattimer, Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 433 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Itoh, Hydrostatic Equilibrium of Hypothetical Quark Stars, Prog

    N. Itoh, Hydrostatic Equilibrium of Hypothetical Quark Stars, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 291 (1970)

    1970

  5. [13]

    A. R. Bodmer, Collapsed nuclei, Physical Review D 4, 1601 (1971)

    1971

  6. [14]

    Witten, Cosmic separation of phases, Physical Review D 30, 272 (1984)

    E. Witten, Cosmic separation of phases, Physical Review D 30, 272 (1984)

    1984

  7. [15]

    Doroshenko, V

    V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, G. P¨ uhlhofer, and A. Santangelo, A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant, Nature Astronomy 6, 1444 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Horvath, L

    J. Horvath, L. Rocha, L. de S´ a, P. Moraes, L. Bar˜ ao, M. de Avellar, A. Bernardo, and R. Bachega, A light strange star in the remnant hess j1731- 347: Minimal consistency checks, Astronomy & Astrophysics 672, L11 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Y. L. Yue, X. H. Cui, and R. X. Xu, Is psr b0943+10 a low-mass quark star?, The Astrophysical Journal 649, L95 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Weber, Strange quark matter and compact stars, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 54, 193 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0407155 [astro-ph]

    F. Weber, Strange quark matter and compact stars, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 54, 193 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0407155 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann

    M. Ruderman, Pulsars: structure and dynamics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 427 (1972). 13

    1972

  12. [20]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ruderman, Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 775 (1970)

    1970

  13. [21]

    A. I. Sokolov, Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liquid, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 52, 575 (1980)

    1980

  14. [22]

    R. F. Sawyer, Condensed pi- phase in neutron star mat- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 382 (1972)

    1972

  15. [23]

    Nelmes and B

    S. Nelmes and B. M. A. G. Piette, Phase transition and anisotropic deformations of neutron star matter, Physi- cal Review D 85, 123004 (2012), arXiv:1204.0910 [astro- ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Barreto and S

    W. Barreto and S. Rojas, An equation of state for radiat- ing dissipative spheres in general relativity, Astrophysics and space science 193, 201 (1992)

    1992

  17. [25]

    Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science 201, 191 (1993)

    W. Barreto, Exploding radiating viscous spheres in gen- eral relativity, Astrophysics and space science 201, 191 (1993)

    1993

  18. [26]

    Yazadjiev, Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonper- turbative analytical approach, Phys

    S. Yazadjiev, Relativistic models of magnetars: Nonper- turbative analytical approach, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044030 (2012), arXiv:1111.3536 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Compact elastic objects in general relativity, Physical Review D 105, 044025 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Karlovini and L

    M. Karlovini and L. Samuelsson, Elastic stars in general relativity. 1. Foundations and equilibrium models, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3613 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211026

    2003 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Herrera and N

    L. Herrera and N. O. Santos, Local anisotropy in self- gravitating systems, Phys. Rept. 286, 53 (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with To- tal Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    O. H. Wilson and W. C. G. Ho, Gravitational waves from glitch-induced f-mode oscillations in quark and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083006 (2024), arXiv:2403.09489 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kumar, P

    A. Kumar, P. Thakur, and M. Sinha, Non-radial oscilla- tions in newly born compact star considering effects of phase transition, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 530, 501 (2024), arXiv:2404.01252 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kuan and K

    H.-J. Kuan and K. D. Kokkotas, f-mode imprints on grav- itational waves from coalescing binaries involving aligned spinning neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D106, 064052 (2022), arXiv:2205.01705 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Stergioulas, A

    N. Stergioulas, A. Bauswein, K. Zagkouris, and H.-T. Janka, Gravitational waves and nonaxisymmetric oscil- lation modes in mergers of compact object binaries, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418, 427 (2011), arXiv:1105.0368 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Bauswein, N

    A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas, and H.-T. Janka, Exploring properties of high-density matter through remnants of neutron-star mergers, European Physical Journal A 52, 56 (2016), arXiv:1508.05493 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chakravarti and N

    K. Chakravarti and N. Andersson, Exploring univer- sality in neutron star mergers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497, 5480 (2020), arXiv:1906.04546 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lioutas, A

    G. Lioutas, A. Bauswein, and N. Stergioulas, Frequency deviations in universal relations of isolated neutron stars and postmerger remnants, Physical Review D 104, 043011 (2021), arXiv:2102.12455 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, Gravitational radiation instability in rotating stars, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 199, L157 (1975)

    1975

  32. [40]

    Chandrasekhar, Solutions of two problems in the the- ory of gravitational radiation, Physical Review Letters 24, 611 (1970)

    S. Chandrasekhar, Solutions of two problems in the the- ory of gravitational radiation, Physical Review Letters 24, 611 (1970)

    1970

  33. [41]

    Surace, K

    M. Surace, K. D. Kokkotas, and P. Pnigouras, The stochastic background of gravitational waves due to the f-mode instability in neutron stars, Astronomy & As- trophysics 586, A86 (2016), arXiv:1512.02502 [astro- ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Passamonti, E

    A. Passamonti, E. Gaertig, K. D. Kokkotas, and D. Doneva, Evolution of the f-mode instability in neu- tron stars and gravitational wave detectability, Physi- cal Review D 87, 084010 (2013), arXiv:1209.5308 [astro- ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Dong and A

    W. Dong and A. Melatos, Gravitational waves from non-radial oscillations of stochastically accreting neutron stars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 530, 2822 (2024), arXiv:2404.11866 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-Radial Pulsa- tion of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis for L >= 2, Astrophys. J. 149, 591 (1967)

    1967

  37. [45]

    Lindblom and S

    L. Lindblom and S. L. Detweiler, The quadrupole oscilla- tions of neutron stars, Astrophys. J. Suppl.53, 73 (1983)

    1983

  38. [46]

    S. L. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, On the nonradial pul- sations of general relativistic stellar models, Astrophys. J. 292, 12 (1985)

    1985

  39. [47]

    G. L. Comer, D. Langlois, and L. M. Lin, Quasinor- mal modes of general relativistic superfluid neutron stars, Physical Review D 60, 104025 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9908040 [gr-qc]

    1999

  40. [48]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. Tominaga, and K.-i. Maeda, Density dis- continuity of a neutron star and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024010 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0108060

    2002 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Miniutti, J

    G. Miniutti, J. A. Pons, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, and V. Fer- rari, Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 338, 389 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0206142

    2003 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mondal and M

    S. Mondal and M. Bagchi (Paper-I), f-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123011 (2024), arXiv:2309.00439 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Sotani and T

    H. Sotani and T. Takiwaki, Accuracy of relativistic Cowl- ing approximation in protoneutron star asteroseismol- ogy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063025 (2020), arXiv:2009.05206 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    C. W. Yip, M.-C. Chu, and P. T. Leung, The quadrupole oscillations of strange-quark stars, The Astrophysical Journal 513, 849 (1999)

    1999

  45. [53]

    Kojima and K.-i

    Y. Kojima and K.-i. Sakata, Discrimination of quark stars from neutron stars in quadrupole oscillations, Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 801 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0209320

    2002 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Sotani and T

    H. Sotani and T. Harada, Nonradial oscillations of quark stars, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024019 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0307035

    2003

  47. [55]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and S. Marassi, Quark matter imprint on Gravitational Waves from oscil- lating stars, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, 1323 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0603464

    2007

  48. [56]

    Zhang, Y.-F

    X.-L. Zhang, Y.-F. Huang, and Z.-C. Zou, Recent pro- gresses in strange quark stars, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 11, 1409463 (2024), arXiv:2404.00363 14 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    J. M. Z. Pretel and C. Zhang, Universal relations for anisotropic interacting quark stars, JCAP 10, 032, arXiv:2401.12519 [nucl-th]

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    J. L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, and E. Gourgoulhon, Recycling strange stars to millisecond periods, Astron. Astrophys. 381, 933 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111162

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, and E. Gourgoulhon, The Crust of rotating strange quark stars, Astron. Astrophys. 372, 535 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0104116

    2001 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M. Dey, I. Bombaci, J. Dey, S. Ray, and B. C. Samanta, Strange stars with realistic quark vector interaction and phenomenological density dependent scalar potential, Phys. Lett. B 438, 123 (1998), [Addendum: Phys.Lett.B 447, 352–353 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 467, 303–305 (1...

    1998 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bagchi, S

    M. Bagchi, S. Ray, M. Dey, and J. Dey, Compact strange stars with a medium dependence in gluons at finite temperature, Astron. Astrophys. 450, 431 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601282

    2006 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. L. Richardson, The Heavy Quark Potential and the Upsilon, J/psi Systems, Phys. Lett. B 82, 272 (1979)

    1979

  55. [63]

    Bagchi, M

    M. Bagchi, M. Dey, S. Daw, and J. Dey, A model finding a new richardson potential with different scales for con- finement and asymptotic freedom, by fitting the proper- ties of ∆++ and Ω−, Nuclear Physics A 740, 109 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405194 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bagchi, S

    M. Bagchi, S. Daw, M. Dey, and J. Dey, Mean-field baryon magnetic moments and sumrules, EPL (Euro- physics Letters) 75, 548 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0504100 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  57. [65]

    R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity, Astrophys. J. 188, 657 (1974)

    1974

  58. [66]

    Horvat, S

    D. Horvat, S. Ilijic, and A. Marunovic, Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with quasi-local equa- tion of state, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 025009 (2011), arXiv:1010.0878 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational wave spectrum of anisotropic neutron stars in Cowl- ing approximation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124023 (2012), arXiv:1203.3963 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Folomeev, Anisotropic neutron stars in R2 gravity, Phys

    V. Folomeev, Anisotropic neutron stars in R2 gravity, Phys. Rev. D 97, 124009 (2018), arXiv:1802.01801 [gr- qc]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, E. Berti, and L. C. B. Crispino, Slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in general relativity and scalar–tensor theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 145008 (2015), arXiv:1411.6286 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  62. [70]

    D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, P. Haensel, and O. Y. Gnedin, The cooling neutron star in 3c 58, Astronomy & Astrophysics 389, L24 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204233 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  63. [71]

    S. L. Detweiler, A variational calculation of the fun- damental frequencies of quadrupole pulsation of fluid spheres in general relativity, The Astrophysical Journal 197, 203 (1975)

    1975

  64. [72]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.299, 1059 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711088

    1998 arXiv

  65. [73]

    T. O. Kv˚ alseth, Cautionary note about r2, The American Statistician 39, 279 (1985)

    1985

  66. [74]

    M. D. Godfrey, Econometric theory, by arthur s. gold- berger, john wiley and sons, new york, 1964, xi + 399 pp, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 11, 230 (1964)

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.