Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 77 references

Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that quantum-chemical torsion scans of the water dimer show discontinuous electronic energy jumps at hydrogen-bond-breaking angles, which classical force fields cannot represent.

desk verdict Rigid torsion-scan jumps are overinterpreted as quantum singularities; the standard water-dimer benchmarks are fine, but the central claim lacks convergence and state-tracking evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20819 v1 pith:4JWSUURN submitted 2025-04-29 physics.chem-ph

Md Rejwan Ali This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords waterdimertorsionanglehydrogen-bondbreakingelectronicenergysingularitydihedralscanforce-fieldrefinementabinitiostructurequantumdiscontinuity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the electronic energy of a weakly hydrogen-bonded dimer does not vary smoothly as one twists it apart: quantum-chemical scans of the water dimer's torsional coordinate yield abrupt jumps at certain critical geometries, whereas conventional molecular-mechanics force fields give smooth, differentiable torsion curves. The work treats these jumps as a quantum signature of hydrogen-bond breaking, arguing that a continuum of molecular geometry under torsion is not physically allowed once a weak bond reaches its breaking threshold. If true, this would mean that standard force-field torsion terms, which are central to biomolecular and polymer simulations, omit a real quantum feature relevant to bond-breaking processes. The claim is checked with several ab initio methods (Hartree–Fock, DFT, MP2) and semiempirical methods, across gas-phase and implicit-water conditions, using both O–H and O–O reaction coordinates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the constrained dihedral (torsion) energy scan: the water dimer is optimized, then one bond length ($r$, either O4–H2 or O1–O4) is held fixed while the torsion angle is rotated from $0^\circ$ to $360^\circ$ in $1^\circ$ steps, and the electronic energy is computed at each step with HF, DFT, MP2, or semiempirical methods. The paper compares these quantum scans with classical molecular-mechanics torsion potentials of the form $V(\phi)=V_N[1+\cos(N\phi-\phi_0)]$, which are smooth and periodic by construction. The sharp energy discontinuities at isolated angles, and the matching singularities in the torsion-dependent dipole moment, are the mechanism carrying the argument: they are presented as break-point conditions in the otherwise connected molecular topology that quantum mechanics produces when a weak bond is strained by torsion.

What would settle it

Re-running the torsion scan with explicit tracking of the electronic state, orbital-stability checks, and convergence diagnostics, or else performing a fully relaxed scan, would settle whether the jumps vanish; alternatively, a single-molecule torque-spectroscopy measurement that finds no force discontinuity at the predicted critical angles would contradict the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that constrained torsion scans of the water dimer produce electronic energy curves that are mostly flat but contain sharp, isolated jumps near bond-breaking angles; in the reported scans the transition is on the order of $5.5$ eV, far above the dimer's roughly $0.22$ eV hydrogen-bond binding energy. The same discontinuity pattern appears for both the O4–H2 hydrogen-bond coordinate and the O1–O4 interaction coordinate, in gas phase and in implicit water, and is reproduced across HF, DFT, MP2, AM1, and PM3 calculations. The paper interprets the jumps, together with accompanying kinks and slope reversals in the dipole moment, as quantum singularities marking the break-up of the molecular topology under torsion, and it contrasts these with the smooth $V(\phi)=V_N[1+\cos(N\phi-\phi_0)]$ torsion curves from classical force fields. From the slope of the energy jump it estimates forces of about $0.16$ to $0.69$ nN, several orders of magnitude larger than typical experimentally measured hydrogen- or covalent-bond breaking forces, which it takes as further evidence that a real bond-breaking event is being captured.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every constrained quantum-chemical scan converges to a well-defined electronic ground state at each torsion angle, so the observed energy jumps are physical features of the water dimer rather than numerical artifacts of the fixed-geometry scan.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the singularities are real, molecular-mechanics torsion terms for weak H-bonded and van der Waals dimers systematically miss a discontinuous energy feature and will misrepresent bond-breaking barriers.
  • Force-field refinements aimed at reaction chemistry would need torsion-dependent terms that can represent the observed break-point conditions rather than smooth periodic functions.
  • Single-molecule torque or force spectroscopy on weakly bound dimers could look for force jumps at the predicted critical torsion angles.
  • Conformational sampling schemes that treat dihedral angles as continuous coordinates may become physically invalid specifically where weak bonds are near their breaking threshold.
  • The O1–O4 coordinate result extends the claim beyond Lewis-bonded atoms, implying that any reaction coordinate connecting molecular fragments can carry the quantum singularity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, a natural next test would be a fully relaxed torsion scan with no fixed bond length; if the jumps persist after relaxation, they are genuine features of the potential energy surface rather than artifacts of the constraint.
  • If the discontinuity is a real electronic-structure effect, the same signature should appear in other weakly bound complexes, such as van der Waals dimers or halogen-bonded systems, whenever a dihedral coordinate strains the interaction.
  • The slope-reversal signature in the dipole moment suggests the effect might be observable as a sudden change in molecular response properties, which could be probed in strong-field or Stark-shift experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports quantum-chemical calculations (HF/6-31G*, B3LYP/6-31G*, B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p), ωB97X-D, MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ) of the water dimer energy as a function of dihedral angle (H5O4H2O1 and H5O4O1H3), with the O4–H2 or O1–O4 distance held fixed. The central claim is that the electronic energy exhibits discontinuities, called “quantum singularities,” at certain torsion angles, which are interpreted as signatures of hydrogen-bond breaking, in contrast to the smooth torsional potentials obtained with MMFF and SYBYL force fields. The paper further asserts that these results reconfirm earlier semi-empirical findings and that they can motivate improvements to classical force fields for weak hydrogen-bonded systems.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, it would be transformative: it would imply that the Born–Oppenheimer electronic energy of even the simplest hydrogen-bonded dimer is not a smooth function of a torsional coordinate, which would affect the interpretation of constrained electronic-structure scans and the physical basis of classical torsional potentials. The manuscript has some strengths: it employs several independent electronic-structure methods and basis sets, reports optimized geometries and vibrational frequencies largely consistent with literature values, and directly compares quantum-chemical and force-field torsion profiles. However, the load-bearing evidence is not convincing. The reported energy jumps are not supported by the necessary computational diagnostics (SCF convergence, wavefunction stability, state tracking), and the interpretive framework is carried over from the prior semi-empirical study without independent physical grounding. As presented, the paper is best understood as a cautionary example of possible numerical artifacts in constrained quantum-chemical scans, not as a demonstration of a new quantum effect.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussions §3A] The central evidence for quantum singularities consists of ~5.5 eV energy jumps in the constrained dihedral scans (Figs. 11–15 and 20–23). The manuscript reports no SCF convergence diagnostics, no wavefunction stability analysis, and no tracking of the electronic state (e.g., orbital occupations or overlap with the previous geometry) along the scans. In a rigid scan of a weakly bound dimer, such jumps are a well-known artifact of SCF root-flipping or convergence failure when the hydrogen bond ruptures and fragments are forced into steric contact. The fact that the jump magnitude is far above the ~0.22 eV H-bond binding energy does not distinguish a physical bond-breaking singularity from a numerical discontinuity. Because the manuscript explicitly interprets these jumps as the molecular electronic energy in §3A, this omission directly undermines the central claim.
  2. [Computational Methodologies §3] The scan protocol fixes either the O4–H2 distance or the O1–O4 distance while stepping the dihedral at 1° resolution over the full 0–360° range. No comparison is provided with an unconstrained scan in which all other internal coordinates are re-optimized at each dihedral angle, nor with a scan in which the constrained distance is relaxed. A rigid scan can force nonbonded atoms into close contact at certain geometries, producing spurious energy spikes that have nothing to do with bond breaking. The paper's observation that the energy is otherwise flat except for narrow ranges of discontinuities is itself a typical signature of rigid constraints rather than of a physically realistic potential surface. Such a control calculation is essential to support the claim that the discontinuities are molecular properties rather than artifacts of the constrained procedure.
  3. [Conclusions] The final paragraph asserts that “for internal rotation quantized electronic energy comes as a natural solution when a torsion-like potential is plugged into the Schrodinger time independent equation” and cites ref. [75]. No derivation or quantitative connection is given. This statement confuses the quantization of bound states in a model torsional Hamiltonian with the parametric continuity of the electronic energy as a function of fixed nuclear coordinates. The Born–Oppenheimer surface for a given electronic state is smooth away from degeneracies; the manuscript does not identify any symmetry or degeneracy in the water dimer that would produce a true ground-state singularity. This unsupported theoretical leap is central to the paper's interpretation of the observed jumps as “quantum signatures” rather than numerical artifacts.
  4. [Introduction and Results and Discussions §3A] The interpretation of energy discontinuities as bond-breaking singularities is carried over from the author's earlier semi-empirical study of Rivastigmine [1] and is asserted rather than independently established. For example, §3A states that the jumps are “indeed quantum singularities” and that this “can also be concluded from torsion-dependent dipole moment variation pattern,” but this is an interpretation of the same calculations without a physical mechanism or a comparison with established high-level water dimer potential energy surfaces (e.g., coupled-cluster results). The argument is therefore circular to the extent that the prior paper's hypothesis is used as the primary evidence for the present claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and passim] The manuscript uses the word “stearic” where “steric” is intended, and “electrotonic” where “electronic” is intended; these terms should be corrected throughout.
  2. [Tables 1–4] The abbreviation “B3YLP” appears in several places (e.g., Table 3 and §2) and should be “B3LYP” consistently.
  3. [Table 2] Table 2 has a blank row for HF/6-31G* in water medium; the manuscript should state whether this calculation failed, was not run, or was omitted for another reason.
  4. [Computational Methodologies §3] The dihedral definitions H5O4H2O1 and H5O4O1H3 are introduced in the text without a clear, labeled definition of the atomic ordering and the fixed distance variables; a small schematic or explicit coordinate definition would improve reproducibility.
  5. [Abstract] The Zenodo link in the Abstract (https://zenodo.org/records/12730902) is labeled “Hypothesis tested” but its content is never described in the text or methods; the authors should state what data or materials it contains.
  6. [Results and Discussions §2, Table 3] The manuscript reports water dimer binding energies but does not state whether basis-set superposition error (BSSE) corrections were applied; because the discussion compares with literature values, a clear statement about BSSE treatment is needed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central interpretation of torsion-energy jumps as bond-breaking 'quantum singularities' is imported from the author's own prior work, though the QM scan energies themselves are newly computed and not fitted.

  1. self citation load bearing [Results & Discussions, Section 3B ('Anisotropic Singularities in Torsion-dependent Electronic Energy Surface'), final paragraph]
    "For weak H-bonded water dimer systems, electronic energy has shown anticipated discontinuities by all ab initio methods applied in conformation space that we reported earlier for Rivastigmine by semi-empirical methods [1] (Ali and Mezei 2021)."

    The observed jumps are labeled 'anticipated discontinuities' solely because the author's earlier paper [1] reported similar jumps for a different molecule by semi-empirical methods. The physical interpretation of a torsion-energy discontinuity as a bond-breaking 'quantum singularity' is not derived from the present first-principles calculations or from an independent theorem; it is imported from the author's own prior work. The same self-citation is used as the premise for further scans ('Based on our hypothesis reported earlier [1] ...') and as the validation target ('to validate our previous general predictions [1]'). Thus the central interpretation is load-bearing on a self-citation, even though the raw energies are new and un-fitted.

  2. self citation load bearing [Conclusions]
    "in this follow-up article, to validate our previous general predictions [1], water dimer has been selectively chosen for computational studies due mainly to the weak nature of the H-bond linking two water monomers. Under torsion, the weak H-bond shows predicted energy singularities via computational chemistry tools in several quantum chemistry protocols."

    This makes explicit that the paper's goal is to validate the author's own earlier prediction, and the validation consists in observing the same phenomenon with different methods. Since the earlier prediction is itself the source of the classification 'predicted energy singularities,' the argument is: [1] predicts singularities; the scans show jumps; therefore [1] is validated and the jumps are signatures. Without external grounding of [1]'s claim, this is a self-referential confirmation loop at the interpretive level.

full rationale

The central numerical content is not circular: the paper carries out new rigid torsion scans of the water dimer at HF, DFT-B3LYP, MP2, and semiempirical levels, with no fitted parameters taken from the earlier paper; the MMFF/SYBYL comparison is an independent classical baseline; and the computed energies are not used as inputs to define the singularities. The circularity risk is confined to the interpretive step: the identification of the observed energy discontinuities as 'quantum singularities' caused by bond breaking is presented as confirmation of 'previous general predictions' from the author's own earlier work [1], and that prior work is not independently derived or externally benchmarked here. Thus the central claim ('electronic energy has anticipated discontinuities ... that we reported earlier for Rivastigmine') rests in part on a self-citation chain. This is not a reduction by construction: no equation makes the observed jump equal to an input, and the new calculations provide independent evidence for the raw phenomenon. The absence of SCF convergence and state-tracking diagnostics is a correctness concern about whether the jumps are physical, not a circularity concern, so it does not further raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on one domain assumption and three interpretive assumptions: that constrained single-reference scans give converged energies, that jumps are physical bond-breaking signatures, that O1-O4 approximates the COM coordinate, and that quantized torsion implies energy discontinuities. None of these is independently verified in the paper.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Single-reference electronic structure methods (HF, DFT, MP2) provide a converged and continuous ground-state energy for the water dimer along the entire constrained torsion path.
    The paper labels every computed point in the scan as the molecular electronic energy, but provides no SCF convergence or wavefunction stability diagnostics.
  • ad hoc to paper Observed energy jumps in the scans are physical signatures of hydrogen-bond breaking rather than numerical artifacts of the constrained calculation.
    This is the interpretive premise on which the central claim rests; it is asserted from visual inspection without independent evidence.
  • domain assumption The O1-O4 distance can serve as the center-of-mass reaction coordinate between the two water monomers.
    The paper uses O1-O4 as an approximate COM coordinate for the O1-O4 torsion surfaces, but the true COM is not exactly at these atoms.
  • ad hoc to paper A torsion-like potential in the time-independent Schrodinger equation yields quantized electronic energies, and hence energy singularities are expected in torsion scans.
    Stated in the Conclusions; the step from quantized internal rotation to discontinuities in electronic energy as a function of a classical torsion angle is not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4JWSUURN

@misc{pith2026250420819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4JWSUURN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20819}
}
read the original abstract

In all standard force field-based simulations of organic, bio-molecules, polymers; the torsion angle based Hamiltonian has been an indispensable term to set up molecular simulation. Torsion often termed as a dihedral angle, the coordinate assumes a continuous molecular geometry and energy changes for an angle range from 0 to 360 degrees. However, quantum mechanics-based results presented earlier and in this report show electronic energy will have singularities due to molecular geometry criticality, and torsion based electrotonic energy is not a smooth function of (r, theta) due to bond-breaking geometry. Contrast to force field or molecular mechanics based results of geometrical and energy continuity, continuum of geometry under torsion is not feasible as per quantum mechanical electronic energy computations. This feature of electronic energy is readily observed for weakly H-bonded and VDW dimers. Applying the ab initio methods of Hartree-Fock, Density Functional as well as Moller-Plesset, we have reconfirmed the previous general predictions of electronic energy singularities with torsion angle variation around weak H-bond equilibrium and beyond for water dimer. Due to the quantum nature of the weak chemical bond breaking process leading to break-point conditions in molecules, the singularities in electronic energy is observed contrast to molecular mechanics results. These overlooked results of quantum energy singularities can be useful to improve the current bio-molecular force field and reaction chemistry dynamics involving bond-breaking process. Hypothesis tested: https://zenodo.org/records/12730902

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1. Water dimer geometry optimized structure and atomic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [75]

    (1974) Internal Rotation in Molecules

    Orville-Thomas W J, Ed. (1974) Internal Rotation in Molecules. W. J. Wiley - Interscience, New York

    work page 1974

  2. [1]

    Observation of Quantum Signature in Rivastigmine Chemical Bond Break -up and Quantum Energetics, Spectral Studies of Anti -Alzheimer Inhibitors,

    Ali M R and Mezei M (2021) “Observation of Quantum Signature in Rivastigmine Chemical Bond Break -up and Quantum Energetics, Spectral Studies of Anti -Alzheimer Inhibitors,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 39:118-128 https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1708462

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    Kinetic and Structural Studies on the Interaction of Cholinesterases with the Anti -Alzheimer Drug Rivastigmine,

    Bar-On P et al. (2002), “Kinetic and Structural Studies on the Interaction of Cholinesterases with the Anti -Alzheimer Drug Rivastigmine,” Biochemistry 41, no. 11: 3555–64, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi020016x

    work page doi:10.1021/bi020016x 2002

  4. [3]

    A Mathematical and Computational Review of Hartree–Fock SCF Methods in Quantum Chemistry,

    Echenique P and Alonso J L, (2007)“A Mathematical and Computational Review of Hartree–Fock SCF Methods in Quantum Chemistry,” Molecular Physics 105, no. 23 – 24 : 3057–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970701757875

    doi:10.1080/00268970701757875 2007

  5. [4]

    30 : 5383 –5403, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9703768

    Baerends E J and Gritsenko O V (1997) A Quantum Chemical View of Density Functional Theory,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 101, no. 30 : 5383 –5403, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9703768

    work page doi:10.1021/jp9703768 1997

  6. [5]

    MP2 Energy Evaluation by Direct Methods,

    Head-Gordon M, Pople J A, and Frisch M J, (1988) “MP2 Energy Evaluation by Direct Methods,” Chemical Physics Letters 153, no. 6 : 503 –6, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(88)85250-3

    doi:10.1016/0009-2614(88)85250-3 1988

  7. [6]

    Imaging an Unsupported Metal –Metal Bond in Dirhenium Molecules at the Atomic Scale,

    Cao K et al., (2020) “Imaging an Unsupported Metal –Metal Bond in Dirhenium Molecules at the Atomic Scale,” Science Advances 6, no. 3 : eaay5849, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay5849

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay5849 2020

  8. [7]

    Torque Spectroscopy for the Study of Rotary Motion in Biological Systems,

    Lipfert J et al., “Torque Spectroscopy for the Study of Rotary Motion in Biological Systems,” (2015) Chemical Reviews 115, no. 3 : 1449 –74, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500119k

    work page doi:10.1021/cr500119k 2015

Show all 77 references
  1. [8]

    Quantifying the Precision of Single-Molecule Torque and Twist Measurements Using Allan Variance,

    Oene M M van et al., (2018) “Quantifying the Precision of Single-Molecule Torque and Twist Measurements Using Allan Variance,” Biophysical Journal 114, no. 8 : 1970 – 79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.039

    2018 doi

  2. [9]

    Laser-Controlled Torsions: Four -Dimensional Theory and the Validity of Reduced Dimensionality Models,

    Grohmann T, Monika Leibscher M and Seideman T, (2017) “Laser-Controlled Torsions: Four -Dimensional Theory and the Validity of Reduced Dimensionality Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no. 20 : 203201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.203201

    2017 doi

  3. [10]

    Correlations in the Motion of Atoms in Liquid Argon,

    Rahman A, (1964) “Correlations in the Motion of Atoms in Liquid Argon,” Physical Review 136, no. 2A (October 19, 1964): A405 –11, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405

    1964 doi

  4. [11]

    Dynamics of Folded Proteins.,

    McCammon J A , Gelin B R, and Karplus M, (1977) “Dynamics of Folded Proteins.,” Nature 267, no. 5612 : 585–90, https://doi.org/10.1038/267585a0

    1977 doi

  5. [12]

    (1989), Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford Science Publ (Clarendon Press), https://books.google.com/books?id=O32VXB9e5P4C

    Allen M P et al. (1989), Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford Science Publ (Clarendon Press), https://books.google.com/books?id=O32VXB9e5P4C

    1989

  6. [13]

    CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations,

    Brooks B R et al. (1983), “CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 4, no. 2 : 187–217, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540040211

    1983 doi

  7. [14]

    A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules,

    Cornell W Det al., (1995)“A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 117, no. 19 : 5179–97, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00124a002

    1995 doi

  8. [15]

    The OPLS [Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations] Potential Functions for Proteins, Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin,

    Jorgensen W L and Julian Tirado-Rives J, (1988) “The OPLS [Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations] Potential Functions for Proteins, Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 110, no. 6 (March 1, 1988): 165...

    1988 doi

  9. [16]

    The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins,

    Shi Y et al., (2013) “The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, no. 9 : 4046 –63, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct4003702

    2013 doi

  10. [17]

    The ReaxFF Reactive Force -Field: Development, Applications and Future Directions, (2016)

    Senftle T P et al., “The ReaxFF Reactive Force -Field: Development, Applications and Future Directions, (2016) ” Npj Computational Materials 2, no. 1 : 15011, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,

    Metropolis N et al., “Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,” (1953) The Journal of Chemical Physics 21, no. 6 : 1087 –92, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114

    1953 doi

  12. [19]

    Chemical Potential of Hard -Sphere Fluids by Monte Carlo Methods,

    Adams D J , (1970) “Chemical Potential of Hard -Sphere Fluids by Monte Carlo Methods,” Molecular Physics 28, no. 5 : 1241 –52, https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977400102551

    1970 doi

  13. [20]

    A Cavity -Biased (T, V, μ) Monte Carlo Method for the Computer Simulation of Fluids,

    Mezei M, “A Cavity -Biased (T, V, μ) Monte Carlo Method for the Computer Simulation of Fluids,” (1980) Molecular Physics 40, no. 4 : 901 –6, https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978000101971

    1980 doi

  14. [21]

    Unified Approach for Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory,

    Car R and Parrinello M, (1985) “Unified Approach for Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, no. 22 : 2471 –74, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2471

    1985 doi

  15. [22]

    Prediction of the Near -IR Spectra of Ices by Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics.,

    Escribano R et al. (2019), “Prediction of the Near -IR Spectra of Ices by Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics.,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP 21, no. 18 : 9433–40, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp00857h

    2019 doi

  16. [23]

    Computing Vibrational Spectra from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics.,

    Thomas M et al., (2013) “Computing Vibrational Spectra from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics.,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP 15, no. 18 : 6608 –22, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp44302g

    2013 doi

  17. [24]

    Infrared Studies of Hydrogen Bonding of Water by the Matrix Isolation Technique,

    Thiel M V, Becker E D, and Pimentel G C, (1957) “Infrared Studies of Hydrogen Bonding of Water by the Matrix Isolation Technique,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 27, no. 2 (August 1, 1957): 486–90, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1743753

    1957 doi

  18. [25]

    Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Energy Transfer and Hydrogen -Bond Breaking in the Water Dimer,

    Ch’ng L C et al. (2012) , “Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Energy Transfer and Hydrogen -Bond Breaking in the Water Dimer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, no. 3: 15430–35, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja305500x

    2012 doi

  19. [26]

    CCSDTQ Optimized Geometry of Water Dimer,

    Lane J R, “CCSDTQ Optimized Geometry of Water Dimer,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, no. 1 (January 8, 2013): 316 –23, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300832f

    2013 doi

  20. [27]

    Molecular Orbital Analysis of the Hydrogen Bonded Water Dimer,

    Wang B et al. (2016) “Molecular Orbital Analysis of the Hydrogen Bonded Water Dimer,” Scientific Reports 6, no. 1 : 22099, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22099

    2016 doi

  21. [28]

    Pure Molecular Beam of Water Dimer,

    Bieker H et al., (2019) “Pure Molecular Beam of Water Dimer,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 123, no. 34, 7486–90, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b06460

    2019 doi

  22. [29]

    Water Clusters,

    Liu K, Cruzan J D, and Saykally R J, “Water Clusters,” (1996) Science 271, no. 5251: 929, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5251.929

    1996 doi

  23. [30]

    Analysis of Weakly Bound Structures: Hydrogen Bond and the Electron Density in a Water Dimer,

    Bartha F et al. (2003), “Analysis of Weakly Bound Structures: Hydrogen Bond and the Electron Density in a Water Dimer,” The Role of Chemistry in the Evolution of Molecular Medicine. A Tribute to Professor Albert Szent-Gyorgyi to Celebrate His 110th Birthday 666–667 : 117–22, h...

    2003 doi

  24. [31]

    Molecular‐Orbital Studies of Hydrogen Bonds. An Ab Initio Calculation for Dimeric H2O,

    Morokuma K and Pedersen L, (1968) “Molecular‐Orbital Studies of Hydrogen Bonds. An Ab Initio Calculation for Dimeric H2O,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 48, no. 7 : 3275–82, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669604

    1968 doi

  25. [32]

    Near -Infrared Spectroscopy and Anharmonic Theory of Protonated Water Clusters: Higher Elevations in the Hydrogen Bonding Landscape,

    McDonald D C et al., “Near -Infrared Spectroscopy and Anharmonic Theory of Protonated Water Clusters: Higher Elevations in the Hydrogen Bonding Landscape,” (2018) The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, no. 19 : 5664 –71, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02499

    2018 doi

  26. [33]

    Infrared Spectroscopy of Neutral Water Dimer Based on a Tunable Vacuum Ultraviolet Free Electron Laser,

    Zhang B et al. (2020), “Infrared Spectroscopy of Neutral Water Dimer Based on a Tunable Vacuum Ultraviolet Free Electron Laser,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, no. 3 : 851–55, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03683

    2020 doi

  27. [34]

    The Vibrational Spectrum of the Water Dimer: Comparison between Anharmonic Ab Initio Calculations and Neon Matrix Infrared Data between 14,000 and 90cm−1

    Bouteiller, Tremblay, and Perchard (2010, “The Vibrational Spectrum of the Water Dimer: Comparison between Anharmonic Ab Initio Calculations and Neon Matrix Infrared Data between 14,000 and 90cm−1.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , vol 114/Issue 25 6829-6831

    2010

  28. [35]

    Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01

    Frisch M J et al., (2016) “Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01” (Wallingford, CT)

    2016

  29. [36]

    A New Mixing of Hartree –Fock and Local Density‐functional Theories,

    Becke A D (1993) , “A New Mixing of Hartree –Fock and Local Density‐functional Theories,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, no. 2 : 1372 –77, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464304

    1993 doi

  30. [37]

    Chai J and Head-Gordon M, (2008) Long-Range Corrected Hybrid Density Functionals with Damped Atom–Atom Dispersion Corrections,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, no. 44 : 6615–20, https://doi.org/10.1039/B810189B

    2008 doi

  31. [38]

    A Complete Basis Set Model Chemistry. I. The Total Energies of Closed‐shell Atoms and Hydrides of the First‐row Elements,

    Petersson G A et al., (1988) “A Complete Basis Set Model Chemistry. I. The Total Energies of Closed‐shell Atoms and Hydrides of the First‐row Elements,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 89, no. 4 : 2193–2218, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.455064

    1988 doi

  32. [39]

    A Complete Basis Set Model Chemistry. II. Open‐shell Systems and the Total Energies of the First‐row Atoms,

    Petersson G A and Al‐Laham M A, (1991) “A Complete Basis Set Model Chemistry. II. Open‐shell Systems and the Total Energies of the First‐row Atoms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 94, no. 9 : 6081–90, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460447

    1991 doi

  33. [40]

    Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. 21. Small Split-Valence Basis Sets for First-Row Elements,

    Binkley J S, John A. Pople J A, and Hehre W H (1980), “Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. 21. Small Split-Valence Basis Sets for First-Row Elements,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 102, no. 3 : 939 –47, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00523a008

    1980 doi

  34. [41]

    Self‐consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XXIII. A Polarization‐type Basis Set for Second‐row Elements,

    Francl M M et al. (1982) , “Self‐consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XXIII. A Polarization‐type Basis Set for Second‐row Elements,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 77, no. 7 : 3654–65, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.444267

    1982 doi

  35. [42]

    Jeffrey G (1997) A 1915-, An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding (New York : Oxford University Press), https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999821330902121

    1997

  36. [43]

    Studies of Molecular Association in H2O and D2O Vapors by Measurement of Thermal Conductivity,

    Curtiss L A, Frurip D J, and Blander M, (1979) “Studies of Molecular Association in H2O and D2O Vapors by Measurement of Thermal Conductivity,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 71, no. 6 : 2703–11, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438628

    1979 doi

  37. [44]

    Hydrogen Bond Energy of the Water Dimer,

    Feyereisen M W, Feller D, and David A. Dixon D A, (1996)“Hydrogen Bond Energy of the Water Dimer,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 100, no. 8 : 2993 –97, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952860l

    1996 doi

  38. [45]

    The Water Dimer Interaction Energy: Convergence to the Basis Set Limit at the Correlated Level,

    Schütz M et al. (1997) , “The Water Dimer Interaction Energy: Convergence to the Basis Set Limit at the Correlated Level,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 107, no. 12 : 4597–4605, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474820

    1997 doi

  39. [46]

    Effect of Basis Set Superposition Error on the Water Dimer Surface Calculated at Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, and Density Functional Theory Levels,

    Simon S, Duran M, and Dannenberg J J, (1999) “Effect of Basis Set Superposition Error on the Water Dimer Surface Calculated at Hartree−Fock, Møller−Plesset, and Density Functional Theory Levels,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 103, no. 11 : 1640–43, https://doi.org/10.102...

    1999 doi

  40. [47]

    The Water Dimer II: Theoretical Investigations,

    Mukhopadhyay A, Xantheas S S, and Saykally R J, (2018) “The Water Dimer II: Theoretical Investigations,” Chemical Physics Letters 700 : 163 –75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.03.057

    2018 doi

  41. [48]

    Significance of Higher-Order Many-Body Interaction Energy Terms in Water Clusters and Bulk Water,

    Xantheas S S, (1996) “Significance of Higher-Order Many-Body Interaction Energy Terms in Water Clusters and Bulk Water,” Philosophical Magazine B 73, no. 1 : 107 –15, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642819608239116

    1996 doi

  42. [49]

    EDF2: (2004) A Density Functional for Predicting Molecular Vibrational Frequencies,

    Lin C Y , Michael W. George M W , and Gill P M W , “EDF2: (2004) A Density Functional for Predicting Molecular Vibrational Frequencies,” Australian Journal of Chemistry 57, no. 4: 365–70

    2004

  43. [50]

    The Vibrational Spectrum of the Water Dimer: Comparison between Anharmonic Ab Initio Calculations and Neon Matrix Infrared Data between 14,000 and 90cm−1,

    Bouteiller Y, Tremblay B, and Perchard J P (2011), “The Vibrational Spectrum of the Water Dimer: Comparison between Anharmonic Ab Initio Calculations and Neon Matrix Infrared Data between 14,000 and 90cm−1,” Chemical Physics 386, no. 1 : 29 – 40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem...

    2011 doi

  44. [51]

    Structure and Vibrational Spectroscopy of the Water Dimer Using Quantum Simulation,

    Coker D F and R. O. Watts R O, (1987) “Structure and Vibrational Spectroscopy of the Water Dimer Using Quantum Simulation,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 91, no. 10 : 2513–18, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100294a015

    1987 doi

  45. [52]

    Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis, Form, Scope, Parameterization, and Performance of MMFF94,

    Halgren T A , (1996) “Merck Molecular Force Field. I. Basis, Form, Scope, Parameterization, and Performance of MMFF94,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 17, no. 5‐6 : 490 –519, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096 - 987X(199604)17:5/6<490::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P

    1996 doi

  46. [53]

    Cramer R D, Opdenbosch N V (1989), “Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field, “ Journal of Computational Chemistry 10, no

    Clark M, Richard D. Cramer R D, Opdenbosch N V (1989), “Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field, “ Journal of Computational Chemistry 10, no. 8: 982-1012, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540100804

    1989 doi

  47. [54]

    Development and Use of Quantum Mechanical Molecular Models. 76. AM1: A New General Purpose Quantum Mechanical Molecular Model,

    Dewar M J S et al., (1985) “ Development and Use of Quantum Mechanical Molecular Models. 76. AM1: A New General Purpose Quantum Mechanical Molecular Model,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 107, no. 13 : 3902 –9, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00299a024

    1985 doi

  48. [55]

    Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods I. Method,

    Stewart J J P, (1989) “Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods I. Method,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 10, no. 2 : 209 –20, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540100208

    1989 doi

  49. [56]

    Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods II. Applications,

    Stewart J J P, (1989) “Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods II. Applications,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 10, no. 2 : 221 –64, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540100209

    1989 doi

  50. [57]

    Spectroscopically Determined Force Field for Water Dimer: Physically Enhanced Treatment of Hydrogen Bonding in Molecular Mechanics Energy Functions,

    Mannfors B, Palmo K, and Krimm S, (2008) “Spectroscopically Determined Force Field for Water Dimer: Physically Enhanced Treatment of Hydrogen Bonding in Molecular Mechanics Energy Functions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 112, no. 49 : 12667–78, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806948w

    2008 doi

  51. [58]

    A New Method for Incorporating Solvent Effect into the Classical, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital and Density Functional Theory Frameworks for Arbitrary Shape Cavity,

    Truong T N and Stefanovich E V, (1995) “A New Method for Incorporating Solvent Effect into the Classical, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital and Density Functional Theory Frameworks for Arbitrary Shape Cavity,” Chemical Physics Letters 240, no. 4 : 253 –60, https://doi.org/10.1016/00...

    1995 doi

  52. [59]

    Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent Model,

    Barone V and Cossi M !988), “Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent Model,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 102, no. 11 : 1995–2001, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9716997

    1995 doi

  53. [60]

    Symmetric versus Asymmetric Discretization of the Integral Equations in Polarizable Continuum Solvation Models,

    Lange A W and Herbert J M, (2011) “Symmetric versus Asymmetric Discretization of the Integral Equations in Polarizable Continuum Solvation Models,” Chemical Physics Letters 509, no. 1 : 77–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.04.092

    2011 doi

  54. [61]

    Reverse Monte Carlo Investigations Concerning Recent Isotopic Substitution Neutron Diffraction Data on Liquid Water,

    Pethes I and László Pusztai L, (2015) “Reverse Monte Carlo Investigations Concerning Recent Isotopic Substitution Neutron Diffraction Data on Liquid Water,” Journal of Molecular Liquids 212 : 111 –16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.08.050

    2015 doi

  55. [62]

    CI Study of the Water Dimer Potential Surface,

    Matsuoka O , Clementi E, and Yoshimine M, “CI Study of the Water Dimer Potential Surface,” (1976) The Journal of Chemical Physics 64, no. 4 : 1351 –61, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.432402

    1976 doi

  56. [63]

    The Water Dimer: Correlation Energy Calculations,

    Chakravorty S J and Ernest R. Davidson E R, (1993) “The Water Dimer: Correlation Energy Calculations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry 97, no. 24 : 6373 –83, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100126a011

    1993 doi

  57. [64]

    Communication: Determination of the Bond Dissociation Energy (D0) of the Water Dimer, (H2O)2, by Velocity Map Imaging,

    Rocher-Casterline B E et al., (2011) “Communication: Determination of the Bond Dissociation Energy (D0) of the Water Dimer, (H2O)2, by Velocity Map Imaging,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, no. 21 : 211101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3598339

    2011 doi

  58. [65]

    The Water Dimer I: Experimental Characterization,

    Mukhopadhyay A, Cole W T S , and Saykally R J , (2015) “The Water Dimer I: Experimental Characterization,” Chemical Physics Letters 633 : 13 –26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.04.016

    2015 doi

  59. [66]

    Bonding Properties of the Water Dimer: A Comparative Study of Density Functional Theories,

    Xu X and Goddard W A , (2004)“Bonding Properties of the Water Dimer: A Comparative Study of Density Functional Theories,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 108, no. 12 : 2305–13, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp035869t

    2004 doi

  60. [67]

    Far-Infrared VRT Spectroscopy of the Water Dimer: Characterization of the 20 Μm out -of-Plane Librational Vibration,

    Cole W T S et al., (2015) “Far-Infrared VRT Spectroscopy of the Water Dimer: Characterization of the 20 Μm out -of-Plane Librational Vibration,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, no. 15 : 154306, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933116

    2015 doi

  61. [68]

    Accurate Description of van Der Waals Complexes by Density Functional Theory Including Empirical Corrections,

    Grimme S, (2004) “Accurate Description of van Der Waals Complexes by Density Functional Theory Including Empirical Corrections,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 25, no. 12 : 1463–73, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20078

    2004 doi

  62. [69]

    Semiempirical GGA-Type Density Functional Constructed with a Long-Range Dispersion Correction,

    Grimme S, (2006) “Semiempirical GGA-Type Density Functional Constructed with a Long-Range Dispersion Correction,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 27, no. 15 : 1787–99, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20495

    2006 doi

  63. [70]

    How Strong Is a Covalent Bond?,

    Grandbois M et al., (1999) “How Strong Is a Covalent Bond?,” Science 283, no. 5408 : 1727, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5408.1727

    1999

  64. [71]

    Single Myosin Molecule Mechanics: Piconewton Forces and Nanometre Steps,

    Finer J T , Robert M. Simmons R M , and James A. Spudich J A , (1994) “Single Myosin Molecule Mechanics: Piconewton Forces and Nanometre Steps,” Nature 368, no. 6467 : 113–19, https://doi.org/10.1038/368113a0

    1994 doi

  65. [72]

    Lewis G N, Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules, (2023) (New York: The Chemical Catalog Company, Inc

    2023

  66. [73]

    The Lewis Electron-Pair Bonding Model: The Physical Background, One Century Later,

    Zhao L, Schwarz W H E, and Frenking G,(2019) “The Lewis Electron-Pair Bonding Model: The Physical Background, One Century Later,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 3, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 35–47, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-018-0052-4

    2019 doi

  67. [74]

    Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods

    Foresman J B and Frisch A, and Inc Gaussian, (1996) “Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods” (Pittsburgh, PA Gaussian, Inc, http://openlibrary.org/books/OL16841025M

    1996

  68. [76]

    Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer

    Ali M R , (2020) “Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer”: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4218545

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer

    Ali M R , (2022) “Quantum Signature of Anisotropic Singularities in Hydrogen Bond Breaking of Water Dimer” https://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs -40070/v2. Also presented as invited communication in 12th Triennial Congress of World Association of Theoretical and Computational Ch...

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.