Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Low Resistance P-type Contacts to Monolayer WSe$_2$ through Chlorinated Solvent Doping

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chloroform soaking turns Pd contacts on monolayer WSe2 into low-resistance p-type contacts.

desk verdict Chloroform soaks give a genuinely simple p-dope for monolayer WSe2; the contact-resistance headline is believable but the pseudo-TLM extraction deserves a harder look. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21102 v1 pith:6YYKPAGO submitted 2025-04-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lauren Hoang , Robert K.A. Bennett , Anh Tuan Hoang , Tara Pena , Zhepeng Zhang , Marisa Hocking , Ashley P. Saunders , Fang Liu
show 2 more authors
Eric Pop Andrew J. Mannix
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords chloroformdopingp-typeWSe2contactresistancesurfacechargetransfertransitionmetaldichalcogenidescryogenicelectronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a bottle-chemistry step—soaking finished monolayer WSe2 transistors in chloroform—is a viable p-type doping strategy for a material whose p-type contacts have been a bottleneck. It reports that the soak raises the maximum hole current of Pd-contacted monolayer WSe2 devices by more than 100×, to over 200 $\mu$A/$\mu$m, lowers extracted contact resistance from 168 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ to about 2.5 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ at room temperature and about 1.0 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ at 10 K, and keeps the on/off ratio near $10^{10}$. It further claims the doping survives more than eight months, retains most of its effect after 150°C anneals, and remains effective at 10 K. If true, this gives a cheap, scalable route to p-type WSe2 contacts and to cryogenic WSe2 transport measurements.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is surface charge transfer doping through physisorbed chloroform: electronegative CHCl3 molecules withdraw electron density from WSe2 without forming covalent bonds or introducing gap states, raising the hole density and narrowing the Schottky barrier at Pd contacts. The supporting structural mechanism is intercalation at the WSe2/gate-oxide interface, evidenced by increased SiO2–WSe2 spacing and a chlorine signal that peaks under thin WSe2, which passivates interfacial traps. The pseudo-transfer-length method is the measurement machinery that converts total resistance versus channel length into a contact-resistance number.

What would settle it

Fabricate the same doped devices with a four-terminal Kelvin structure and compare the directly measured contact resistance with the pseudo-TLM value of about 2.5 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$; a large disagreement would show that the TLM assumption of length-independent contact resistance does not hold for this process.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that chloroform acts as a strong, stable p-type surface charge-transfer dopant for monolayer WSe2: DFT gives adsorption energies of −373 meV (Cl-facing) and −287 meV (H-facing), Bader analysis puts charge transfer from WSe2 to CHCl3 at 0.01–0.03 electrons per molecule, and the projected density of states shows no chloroform states in the band gap. Spectroscopically, the doping appears as photoluminescence quenching and increased trion emission; electrically, it shifts threshold voltages positive, raises maximum hole current from roughly 1 $\mu$A/$\mu$m to over 200 $\mu$A/$\mu$m in Pd-contacted devices, and lowers the extracted contact resistance from 168 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ to about 2.5 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ at 296 K and 1.0 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ at 10 K. The authors attribute the doping's unusual stability to strong physisorption combined with intercalation of chloroform at the WSe2/oxide interface, observed by AFM and Auger spectroscopy, which also reduces subthreshold swing and interfacial disorder.

Load-bearing premise

The reported contact resistance depends on the assumption that every device, whatever its channel length, is identical apart from that length; if channel-length-dependent variations in doping or contacts exist, the extracted values are biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Chloroform doping can be applied after device fabrication by a simple overnight soak, removing the need for substitutional doping or evaporated oxide charge-transfer layers in p-type WSe2 contacts.
  • Because the on/off ratio stays near $10^{10}$, the hole-current improvement is not bought at the cost of transistor switching.
  • The roughly 1 $\mathrm{k}\Omega\cdot\mu\mathrm{m}$ contact resistance at 10 K should make monolayer WSe2 practical for low-temperature and quantum transport measurements, where contact resistance usually gets worse.
  • The stated 150°C thermal budget implies compatibility with atomic-layer-deposition oxide encapsulation and top-gated device processing.
  • Devices retain at least 81% of their doped current after 243 days, suggesting the method can survive realistic aging in a lab environment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer that the same soak may p-dope other monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, because the DFT picture is a generic physisorption charge transfer rather than a WSe2-specific reaction; this is testable but not claimed by the paper.
  • The paper's comparison between chloroform and dichloroethane suggests a dipole-moment trend; my inference is that the doping strength should scale with molecular dipole and accessibility to the interface, which could be checked with a small homologous series of chlorinated solvents.
  • If interfacial chloroform is what lowers the subthreshold swing, the treatment might work as a general dielectric-interface passivation for TMD transistors independent of doping, which the paper suggests but does not separate experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports that exposing monolayer WSe2 transistors to chloroform produces p-type doping: in Pd-contacted devices the maximum hole current increases by over 100x (to >200 µA/µm at VDS = -1 V), the room-temperature contact resistance is reported as ~2.5 kΩ·µm, the cryogenic (10 K) contact resistance as ~1.0 kΩ·µm, the on/off ratio remains near 10^10, and the doping is claimed to survive for 8 months and annealing at 150 °C. The authors support these claims with electrical statistics on 101 devices, Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy, temperature-dependent PL, DFT adsorption and Bader-charge calculations, and AES/AFM/XPS evidence for chloroform intercalation at the WSe2/oxide interface. They argue that chloroform acts as a physisorptive p-dopant that does not introduce mid-gap states and that the interfacial intercalation improves stability and reduces subthreshold swing.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this is a practically useful and unusually simple route to p-type doping of monolayer WSe2, with a stability profile that compares favorably with oxide- and halide-based dopants and with a cryogenic contact resistance that would be of interest for low-temperature transport studies. The paper's strengths include a large device statistics set (101 devices), long-term time-series stability data (>8 months), independent low-temperature electrical measurements, and a mechanistic picture that combines DFT (adsorption energies, Bader charges, pDOS) with surface/interface spectroscopy (AES, XPS, AFM). The DFT and spectroscopy results are not used to fit the electrical data, so the mechanism evidence is not circular. The main weakness is that the headline contact-resistance values rest on a pseudo-TLM extraction whose assumptions are not verified and whose raw data and error statistics are not shown.

major comments (3)
  1. The central quantitative claim of low contact resistance (RC ~2.5 kΩ·µm at 296 K and ~1.0 kΩ·µm at 10 K) is extracted with a pseudo-TLM method, as described in the Methods: 'devices made were single devices with varying channel lengths,' with a linear fit of RTOT versus Lch giving 2RC from the intercept. This method assumes that all devices share the same sheet resistance and the same contact resistance, and that these values do not vary systematically with channel length. The manuscript does not provide the raw RTOT-versus-Lch data, per-channel-length statistics, error bars on the fit, or a confidence interval for the extracted RC. Without these, the reported 2.5 kΩ·µm and 1.0 kΩ·µm values cannot be evaluated against the scatter in the device population. Given that the paper's own mechanism evidence (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. S11) localizes chloroform at the WSe2/oxide interface rather than under the metal contacts, a channel-length-dependent doping profile is a plausible alternative explanation for the intercept. The authors should provide the raw TLM data with error bars, test the sensitivity of the extracted RC to excluding individual channel lengths, and ideally corroborate the result with an extraction method that does not rely on identical devices across channel lengths.
  2. The text attributes the RC reduction to 'doping of the WSe2 region near the contacts, which narrows the metal-semiconductor energy barrier width' (main text, paragraph after Fig. 2), but no experimental evidence shows that chloroform reaches the WSe2 under the Pd/Au contacts. The AFM/AES/XPS data demonstrate intercalation at the open WSe2/oxide interface, not at the buried metal/WSe2 interface. The observed positive VT shift and large current increase are fully consistent with channel doping alone, and a channel-only doping effect would bias the pseudo-TLM intercept in exactly the manner described above. The authors should either provide evidence of under-contact doping (e.g., doping before versus after contact deposition, or spatially resolved characterization at contact edges) or temper the claim that the RC improvement originates from contact-region doping rather than from channel resistance reduction.
  3. The labeling of the RC values is confusing: the text reports '2.5 (2.8) kΩ·µm for our best (median) pseudo-TLM structure,' while Fig. 2e shows 'Best TLM 2.54 kΩ·µm' and 'Median TLM 2.8 kΩ·µm.' It is unclear how many devices contribute to the median, what the spread is, and whether the 'best' value corresponds to a particular channel length subset. Table S1 lists only single values (2.5 and 1.0 kΩ·µm) with no uncertainty. These numbers should be presented with the underlying distribution, for example as box plots or interquartile ranges, so that the state-of-the-art comparison in Table S1 is meaningful.
minor comments (6)
  1. The pseudo-TLM description should state the number of devices per channel length and the range of gate overdrive over which the fit is performed; currently only the formula and the linear-fit description are given.
  2. The main text and supplementary figures refer to 'counterclockwise hysteresis' without defining the sweep direction convention; adding an arrow or a sentence in the caption would remove ambiguity.
  3. The statement that '150°C can be treated as a safe upper-bound' is based on sequential annealing of the same devices; a fresh device annealed directly at 200 °C would be a cleaner test of the thermal budget, and this limitation should be noted.
  4. The Bader charge values are stated to be 'per chloroform molecule,' but the DFT is performed on a 5x5 WSe2 supercell with a single molecule; the text should explicitly state the assumed coverage and any coverage dependence.
  5. Reference 52 ('Paso, K. G. Constructing thermodynamic models of toxic metal biosorption') appears to be an unusual source for the statement that chemisorption is typically accompanied by adsorption energies below -500 meV; a more standard surface-science reference would be appropriate.
  6. The label 'RC = 168 kΩ·µm' in Supplementary Fig. S3b appears without an indication of the gate overdrive at which it is quoted; the main text cites it as 'the initial RC before chloroform exposure,' so the operating point should be specified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the electrical improvements are direct measurements, the DFT doping prediction is independent of the device data, and the only self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims are empirical: transfer curves measured before and after chloroform exposure show a ~100x increase in hole current, positive VT shifts, stable currents over 243 days, and retention after 150 °C anneals. These are direct time-series and temperature-series measurements, not outputs re-derived from a fitted model. The RC values are extracted from a pseudo-TLM linear fit of R_TOT versus L_ch; this is a standard parameter extraction from measured resistance values, not a prediction of a quantity that was already used as an input. The DFT adsorption energies, Bader charges, and projected DOS are computed ab initio for a WSe2/chloroform supercell and are not fitted to, or normalized against, the measured transistor currents, so the theoretical p-doping mechanism is independent evidence. PL, Raman, AFM, AES, and XPS provide separate physical probes of doping and intercalation. The only self-citation (Ref. 9, Hoang et al. on NbP semimetal contacts) appears in a benchmarking sentence about alternative contact strategies and is not used as a load-bearing premise for the chloroform result. The reviewer concern about pseudo-TLM uniformity assumptions (same sheet and contact resistance across channel lengths, single device per length) is a legitimate methodological caveat about extraction accuracy, but it is a correctness risk rather than circularity: no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent result. Thus the paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the circularity patterns considered.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fit to the device data in this paper; the electrical metrics are direct measurements and the DFT quantities are computed with standard methods rather than adjusted to match the measured currents. The central claim rests on standard approximations for DFT and TLM analysis, plus an interpretive model for the AES/AFM depth information. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kohn-Sham DFT with PBE exchange-correlation, DFT-D2 van der Waals correction, PAW pseudopotentials, and Bader charge analysis adequately describes chloroform physisorption and charge transfer on monolayer WSe2.
    Invoked in Methods under Density Functional Theory (DFT) Simulations to support the p-doping mechanism and absence of mid-gap states; no experimental verification of the adsorption geometry or charge transfer magnitude is provided.
  • domain assumption Resistance of a transistor is R_total = 2RC + R_sh L_ch, and the pseudo-TLM fit across different channel lengths yields a valid 2RC intercept.
    Used in Methods for RC extraction; assumes negligible device-to-device variation in R_sh and RC across 0.1 to 1 um channel lengths.
  • domain assumption Auger electron spectroscopy signal from Cl is attenuated by the WSe2 overlayer, so the observed decrease of Cl signal with WSe2 thickness indicates Cl is beneath the WSe2.
    Used in Figure 5 to conclude interfacial intercalation; alternative interpretations (top adsorption with thickness-dependent shadowing) are not quantitatively excluded.
  • domain assumption A positive constant-current threshold-voltage shift is a valid indicator of p-type doping in the channel.
    Standard device-physics interpretation used in Figure 2d; it does not by itself separate doping from fixed charge or interface trap effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low Resistance P-type Contacts to Monolayer WSe$_2$ through Chlorinated Solvent Doping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6YYKPAGO

@misc{pith2026250421102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low Resistance P-type Contacts to Monolayer WSe$_2$ through Chlorinated Solvent Doping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6YYKPAGO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21102}
}
abstract

Tungsten diselenide (WSe$_2$) is a promising p-type semiconductor limited by high contact resistance ($R_\textrm{C}$) and the lack of a reliable doping strategy. Here, we demonstrate that exposing WSe$_2$ to chloroform provides simple and stable p-type doping. In monolayer WSe$_2$ transistors with Pd contacts, chloroform increases the maximum hole current by over 100$\times$ (>200 $\mu$A/$\mu$m), reduces $R_\textrm{C}$ to ~2.5 k$\Omega\cdot\mu$m, and retains an on/off ratio of $10^{10}$ at room temperature. These improvements persist for over 8 months, survive annealing above 150 {\deg}C, and remain effective down to 10 K, enabling a cryogenic $R_\textrm{C}$ of ~1 k$\Omega\cdot\mu$m. Density functional theory indicates that chloroform strongly physisorbs to WSe$_2$, inducing hole doping with minimal impact on the electronic states between the valence band and conduction band edges. Auger electron spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy reveal that chloroform intercalates at the WSe$_2$ interface with the gate oxide, contributing to doping stability and mitigating interfacial dielectric disorder. This robust, scalable approach enables high-yield WSe$_2$ transistors with good p-type performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Nanoribbon Transistors with Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Monolayer MoS2, WS2, and WSe2 nanoribbons with widths down to 25 nm reach record current densities, including above 400 µA/µm in enhancement-mode WS2 devices.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    O’Brien, K. P. et al. Process integration and future outlook of 2D transistors. Nat. Commun. 14, 6400 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Kim, K. S. et al. The future of two-dimensional semiconductors beyond Moore’s law. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 895–906 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    & Nowak, E

    Razavieh, A., Zeitzoff, P. & Nowak, E. J. Challenges and Limitations of CMOS Scaling for FinFET and beyond Architectures. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 18, 999–1004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Shen, P.-C. et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature 593, 211–217 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Li, W. et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts. Nature 613, 274–279 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    & Kis, A

    Allain, A., Kang, J., Banerjee, K. & Kis, A. Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1195–1205 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Liu, Y. et al. Low-resistance metal contacts to encapsulated semiconductor monolayers with long transfer length. Nat. Electron. 5, 579–585 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Lin, Y.-T. et al. Antimony–Platinum Modulated Contact Enabling Majority Carrier Polarity Selection on a Monolayer Tungsten Diselenide Channel. Nano Lett. 24, 8880–8886 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Hoang, L. et al. Enabling P-type Conduction in Bilayer WS2 with NbP Topological Semimetal Contacts. arXiv Prepr. 2409.18926 (2024) doi:arXiv.2409.18926

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Kozhakhmetov, A. et al. Controllable p-Type Doping of 2D WSe2 via Vanadium Substitution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Qin, Z. et al. Growth of Nb-Doped Monolayer WS2 by Liquid-Phase Precursor Mixing. ACS Nano 13, 10768–10775 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Cai, L. et al. Rapid flame synthesis of atomically thin MoO3 down to monolayer thickness for effective hole doping of WSe2. Nano Lett. 17, 3854–3861 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Pang, C. S. et al. Atomically Controlled Tunable Doping in High-Performance WSe2 Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Hung, T. Y. T. et al. pMOSFET with CVD-grown 2D semiconductor channel enabled by ultra- thin and fab-compatible spacer doping. in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) vols 2022-December 7.3.1-7.3.4 (IEEE, 2022)

    2022

  7. [16]

    Fang, H. et al. High-performance single layered WSe2 p-FETs with chemically doped contacts. Nano Lett. 12, 3788–3792 (2012)

    2012

  8. [18]

    Choi, M. S. et al. Lateral MoS2 p-n junction formed by chemical doping for use in high- performance optoelectronics. ACS Nano 8, 9332–9340 (2014)

    2014

  9. [19]

    Xie, J. et al. Low Resistance Contact to P-Type Monolayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 24, 5937–5943 (2024)

    2024

  10. [20]

    Pack, J. et al. Charge-transfer contacts for the measurement of correlated states in high-mobility WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 948–954 (2024)

    2024

  11. [21]

    Kim, I. et al. Low Contact Resistance WSe2 p-Type Transistors with Highly Stable, CMOS- Compatible Dopants. Nano Lett. 24, 13528–13533 (2024)

    2024

  12. [22]

    Lee, D. et al. Remote modulation doping in van der Waals heterostructure transistors. Nat. Electron. 4, (2021)

    2021

  13. [23]

    & Chhowalla, M

    Wang, Y., Sarkar, S., Yan, H. & Chhowalla, M. Critical challenges in the development of electronics based on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Electron. 7, 638–645 (2024)

    2024

  14. [24]

    Yang, L. et al. Chloride molecular doping technique on 2D materials: WS2 and MoS2. Nano Lett. 15 14, 6275–6280 (2014)

    2014

  15. [25]

    Devi, D. S. & Mohapatra, N. R. Exploring p-Type Contact for Monolayer WS2 FETs Using Halogen Doping and Intermediate Layers. ACS Omega 9, 50634–50641 (2024)

    2024

  16. [26]

    Zhang, H. et al. Improvement of P-Type Contact in WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors via Defect Engineering. Nano Lett. (2025) doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05970

    2025 doi

  17. [27]

    Zou, T. et al. High-Performance Solution-Processed 2D P-Type WSe2 Transistors and Circuits through Molecular Doping. Adv. Mater. 35, (2023)

    2023

  18. [28]

    Kim, H. H. et al. Substrate-induced solvent intercalation for stable graphene doping. ACS Nano 7, 1155–1162 (2013)

    2013

  19. [29]

    & Choi, J

    Choi, J., Zhang, H., Du, H. & Choi, J. H. Understanding Solvent Effects on the Properties of Two- Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 8864–8869 (2016)

    2016

  20. [30]

    Poddar, P. K. et al. Resist-Free Lithography for Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 22, 726–732 (2022)

    2022

  21. [36]

    Ortiz-Conde, A. et al. A review of recent MOSFET threshold voltage extraction methods. Microelectron. Reliab. 42, 583–596 (2002)

    2002

  22. [37]

    Lockhart De La Rosa, C. J. et al. Highly efficient and stable MoS2 FETs with reversible n-doping using a dehydrated poly(vinyl-alcohol) coating. Nanoscale 9, 258–265 (2017)

    2017

  23. [38]

    W., Pop, E

    Ber, E., Grady, R. W., Pop, E. & Yalon, E. Uncovering the Different Components of Contact Resistance to Atomically Thin Semiconductors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 9, (2023)

    2023

  24. [39]

    Illarionov, Y. Y. et al. Insulators for 2D nanoelectronics: the gap to bridge. Nat. Commun. 11, 3385 (2020)

    2020

  25. [40]

    Liu, M. et al. Periodical Ripening for MOCVD Growth of Large 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Domains. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2212773 (2023)

    2023

  26. [41]

    Lyons, T. P. et al. The valley Zeeman effect in inter- and intra-valley trions in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Commun. 10, 2330 (2019)

    2019

  27. [42]

    Jadczak, J. et al. Probing of free and localized excitons and trions in atomically thin WSe2, WS2, MoSe2 and MoS2 in photoluminescence and reflectivity experiments. Nanotechnology 28, (2017)

    2017

  28. [44]

    Wu, Z. et al. Defect Activated Photoluminescence in WSe2 Monolayer. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 12294–12299 (2017)

    2017

  29. [45]

    Greben, K., Arora, S., Harats, M. G. & Bolotin, K. I. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Defect-Related Excitons in TMDCs. Nano Lett. 20, 2544–2550 (2020)

    2020

  30. [46]

    Munson, K. T. et al. Influence of Substrate-Induced Charge Doping on Defect-Related Excitonic 16 Emission in Monolayer MoS2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 7850–7856 (2024)

    2024

  31. [47]

    Kong, L., Enders, A., Rahman, T. S. & Dowben, P. A. Molecular adsorption on graphene. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 443001 (2014)

    2014

  32. [48]

    & Zhu, H

    Zhou, C., Yang, W. & Zhu, H. Mechanism of charge transfer and its impacts on Fermi-level pinning for gas molecules adsorbed on monolayer WS2. J. Chem. Phys. 142, (2015)

    2015

  33. [49]

    Szary, M. J. Toward high selectivity of sensor arrays: Enhanced adsorption interaction and selectivity of gas detection (N2, O2, NO, CO, CO2, NO2, SO2, AlH3, NH3, and PH3) on transition metal dichalcogenides (MoS2, MoSe2, and MoTe2). Acta Mater. 274, (2024)

    2024

  34. [50]

    Parija, A. et al. Electronic structure modulation of MoS2 by substitutional Se incorporation and interfacial MoO3 hybridization: Implications of Fermi engineering for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution and oxygen evolution. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2, (2021)

    2021

  35. [51]

    & Pachter, R

    Mehmood, F. & Pachter, R. Density functional theory study of chemical sensing on surfaces of single-layer MoS2 and graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 115, (2014)

    2014

  36. [52]

    Paso, K. G. Constructing thermodynamic models of toxic metal biosorption. in Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation 109–143 (Elsevier, 2022). doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-85455- 9.00020-5

    2022 doi

  37. [53]

    Xie, L. et al. Electrical measurement of non-destructively p-type doped graphene using molybdenum trioxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, (2011)

    2011

  38. [54]

    & Tsukagoshi, K

    Yamamoto, M., Nakaharai, S., Ueno, K. & Tsukagoshi, K. Self-Limiting Oxides on WSe2 as Controlled Surface Acceptors and Low-Resistance Hole Contacts. Nano Lett. 16, 2720–2727 (2016)

    2016

  39. [56]

    S., Dumcenco, D

    Ovchinnikov, D., Allain, A., Huang, Y. S., Dumcenco, D. & Kis, A. Electrical transport properties of single-layer WS2. ACS Nano 8, 8174–8181 (2014)

    2014

  40. [57]

    Qiu, H. et al. Electrical characterization of back-gated bi-layer MoS2 field-effect transistors and the effect of ambient on their performances. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, (2012)

    2012

  41. [58]

    Ko, K. et al. Competition between Bipolar Conduction Modes in Extrinsically p-Doped MoS2: Interaction with Gate Dielectric Matters. ACS Nano 19, 1630–1641 (2025)

    2025

  42. [59]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154105 (2020)

    2020

  43. [60]

    & Jónsson, H

    Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A. & Jónsson, H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36, 354–360 (2006)

    2006

  44. [61]

    Herath, U., Tavadze, P. & He, X. PyProcar: A Python library for electronic structure pre/post- processing. Comput. Phys. Commun. 251, 107080 (2020)

    2020

  45. [62]

    & Izumi, F

    Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011). 1 Supplementary Information Low Resistance P-Type Contacts to Monolayer WSe 2 through Chlorinated Solvent Doping Lauren Hoa...

    2011

  46. [63]

    Undoped (WSe2 on HfO2)

  47. [64]

    Doped (WSe2 on HfO2)

  48. [65]

    S1 2 | Effect of Dichloroethane (DCE) as a p-type Dopant in Comparison to Chloroform

    Doped (HfO2) 13 Supplementary Fig. S1 2 | Effect of Dichloroethane (DCE) as a p-type Dopant in Comparison to Chloroform. a, Diagram of a chloroform (top) and 1,2 dichloroethane (DCE) molecule (bottom). b, Measured ID vs. VGS curves of a monolayer WSe2 device before and after d...

  49. [66]

    Kang, D. H. et al. Controllable nondegenerate p-type doping of tungsten diselenide by octadecyltrichlorosilane. ACS Nano 9, 1099–1107 (2015)

    2015

  50. [67]

    S., Hone, J

    Borah, A., Nipane, A., Choi, M. S., Hone, J. & Teherani, J. T. Low-Resistance p-Type Ohmic Contacts to Ultrathin WSe2 by Using a Monolayer Dopant. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 2941–2947 (2021)

    2021

  51. [68]

    P., Bashir, R

    Chen, S., Zhang, Y., King, W. P., Bashir, R. & van der Zande, A. M. Extension Doping with Low‐Resistance Contacts for P‐Type Monolayer WSe2 Field‐Effect Transistors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2400843 (2024)

    2024

  52. [69]

    Varshni, Y. P. Temperature dependence of the energy gap in semiconductors. Physica 34, 149–154 (1967)

    1967

  53. [70]

    Li, Z. et al. Revealing the biexciton and trion-exciton complexes in BN encapsulated WSe2. Nat. Commun. 9, (2018)

    2018

  54. [71]

    Tang, Y., Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Long valley lifetime of dark excitons in single-layer WSe2. Nat. Commun. 10, (2019)

    2019

  55. [72]

    Huang, J., Hoang, T. B. & Mikkelsen, M. H. Probing the origin of excitonic states in monolayer WSe2. Sci. Rep. 6, (2016)

    2016

  56. [73]

    Wu, Z. et al. Defects as a factor limiting carrier mobility in WSe2: A spectroscopic investigation. Nano Res. 9, 3622–3631 (2016)

    2016

  57. [74]

    Dorow, C. et al. Advancing Monolayer 2-D nMOS and pMOS Transistor Integration from Growth to Van der Waals Interface Engineering for Ultimate CMOS Scaling. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68, 6592–6598 (2021)

    2021

  58. [75]

    O’Brien, K. P. et al. Advancing 2D Monolayer CMOS Through Contact, Channel and Interface Engineering. in 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 7.1.1-7.1.4 (IEEE, 2021). doi:10.1109/IEDM19574.2021.9720651

    2021

  59. [76]

    Maxey, K. et al. 300 mm MOCVD 2D CMOS Materials for More (Than) Moore Scaling. in 2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits) 419–420 (IEEE, 2022). doi:10.1109/VLSITechnologyandCir46769.2022.9830457

    2022

  60. [77]

    Wang, Y. et al. P-type electrical contacts for 2D transition-metal dichalcogenides. Nature 610, 61–66 (2022)

    2022

  61. [78]

    Kim, K. S. et al. Non-epitaxial single-crystal 2D material growth by geometric confinement. Nature 614, 88–94 (2023)

    2023

  62. [80]

    Wang, X., Xiong, X., Shi, X., Gu, C. & Wu, Y. Optimized electrical properties of p-type field-effect transistors based on WSe2 grown at moderate temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, (2023)

    2023

  63. [82]

    Mortelmans, W. et al. Record Performance in GAA 2D NMOS and PMOS Using Monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 with Scaled Contact and Gate Length. in 2024 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits) 1–2 (IEEE, 16 2024). doi:10.1109/VLSITechnologyandCir46783....

    2024

  64. [83]

    Chiang, C.-C. et al. Air-Stable P-Doping in Record High-Performance Monolayer WSe2 Devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43, 319 (2022)

    2022

  65. [84]

    Chou, A.-S. et al. High-Performance Monolayer WSe2 p/n FETs via Antimony-Platinum Modulated Contact Technology towards 2D CMOS Electronics. in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 7.2.1-7.2.4 (IEEE, 2022). doi:10.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019491

    2022

  66. [85]

    Lin, Y.-T. et al. Antimony–Platinum Modulated Contact Enabling Majority Carrier Polarity Selection on a Monolayer Tungsten Diselenide Channel. Nano Lett. 24, 8880– 8886 (2024)

    2024

  67. [86]

    Hung, T. Y. T. et al. pMOSFET with CVD-grown 2D semiconductor channel enabled by ultra-thin and fab-compatible spacer doping. in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) vols 2022-December 7.3.1-7.3.4 (IEEE, 2022)

    2022

  68. [88]

    & Chen, Z

    Lan, H.-Y., Tripathi, R., Liu, X., Appenzeller, J. & Chen, Z. Wafer-scale CVD Monolayer WSe2 p-FETs with Record-high 727 μA/μm Ion and 490 μS/μm gmax via Hybrid Charge Transfer and Molecular Doping. in 2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 (IEEE, 2023). doi:10...

    2023

  69. [89]

    Chen, Z. et al. Stable Nitric Oxide Doping in Monolayer WSe2 for High-Performance P- type Transistors. at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4916442/v1 (2024)

    2024 doi

  70. [90]

    Ho, P. H. et al. High-Performance WSe2 Top-Gate Devices with Strong Spacer Doping. Nano Lett. 23, 10236–10242 (2023)

    2023

  71. [91]

    Xie, J. et al. Low Resistance Contact to P-Type Monolayer WSe2. Nano Lett. 24, 5937– 5943 (2024)

    2024

  72. [92]

    Pack, J. et al. Charge-transfer contacts for the measurement of correlated states in high- mobility WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 948–954 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.