Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Rank-two tensors and deconfinement in 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ $SU(N)$ gauge theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ $SU(N)$ gauge theories with two antisymmetric tensors and $n_f+n_a=4$ confine for every flavor split, and that symmetric-tensor theories with linear monopole superpotentials confine as well.

desk verdict A careful, mostly convincing deconfinement proof of the remaining antisymmetric-tensor dualities plus new symmetric-tensor dualities; the main caveat is an explicitly acknowledged missing term in the Sec. 3.2 WZ superpotential that leaves that one duality conjectural. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21654 v1 pith:APY24MRQ submitted 2025-04-30 hep-th

Antonio Amariti , Fabio Mantegazza , Simone Rota This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T6081T13 PACS 11.30.Pb11.15.-q
keywords 3dN=2supersymmetrytensordeconfinementconfiningdualitiesantisymmetrictensorssymmetriclinearmonopolesuperpotentialshyperbolicGammafunctionsWess-Zuminomodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that a large class of three-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric gauge theories confines. For $SU(N)$ with two antisymmetric tensors and $n_f+n_a=4$ fundamentals plus antifundamentals, every split $(n_f,n_a)$ is shown to flow to a Wess-Zumino model of gauge-singlet fields, completing a classification that earlier work had left open for $n_f<3$. The proof runs by tensor deconfinement: each antisymmetric tensor is traded for an auxiliary symplectic gauge node, the central $SU(N)$ node is dualized, and the auxiliary nodes confine back to the expected singlets. The paper also derives confining dualities for $SU(N)$ with a symmetric tensor and a linear monopole superpotential, obtained by applying the duplication formula for hyperbolic Gamma functions to circle-reduced four-dimensional confining dualities, and reproduces them by deconfinement. These results matter because they turn moduli-space conjectures into derivations from known elementary dualities, and every proof carries an exact identity for the squashed three-sphere partition function.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is tensor deconfinement: replacing a rank-two tensor by an auxiliary gauge node connected to the original node by bifundamentals, so that confining the auxiliary node reproduces the tensor. Antisymmetric tensors are deconfined through $USp$ gauge theories, with linear monopole superpotentials in the symmetric-tensor sections, and the symmetric tensor is deconfined through the $SO(N)$ duality with $N+1$ vectors and monopole superpotential $W=Y^+_{SO(N)}$. The second piece is the duplication formula for the hyperbolic Gamma function, $\Gamma_h(2z)=\Gamma_h(z)\Gamma_h(z+\omega_1/2)\Gamma_h(z+\omega_2/2)\Gamma_h(z+\omega)$, which converts circle-reduced identities with antisymmetric tensors into identities with symmetric tensors and imposes a balancing condition identified with a linear monopole superpotential. The third piece is the base confining duality for $SU(M)$ with two antisymmetric tensors and four fundamentals, reviewed in Appendix A, which terminates every chain of the first part, together with the effective $S^1$ confining dualities that supply the monopole-deformed confining phases.

What would settle it

Evaluate numerically both sides of one of the claimed partition-function identities, for example Eq. (2.65) for $SU(2n+1)$ with one fundamental and three antifundamentals at $n=2$, at generic mass parameters satisfying the balancing condition; any mismatch would disprove the confining duality. Because the proof reduces the identity to known dualities plus the inversion relation for hyperbolic Gamma functions, a mismatch would also locate the failure in one of the deconfinement steps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the confining dualities for $SU(N)$ with two antisymmetric tensors and $n_f+n_a=4$, proposed earlier in the literature, are correct and can be derived for all $n_f$. In each parity of $N$ and each flavor split, the paper deconfines $A_1,A_2$ into two $USp$ nodes, dualizes the $SU(N)$ node to $SU(N')$ with smaller rank, then confines the $USp$ nodes; what remains is $SU(N')$ with two conjugate antisymmetric tensors and four antifundamentals, exactly the base confining duality reviewed in Appendix A. The superpotential obtained at the end coincides term-by-term with the one conjectured from the chiral ring, including the dressed-monopole terms. For symmetric tensors the paper claims that $SU(N)$ with a symmetric $S$, fundamentals and antifundamentals and/or a conjugate antisymmetric, deformed by $W=S\widetilde Q_S^2+Y_{\mathrm{SU}(N-2)}$, is confining; the balancing condition on the mass parameters is enforced by the linear monopole superpotential, and the Wess-Zumino dual is reproduced through deconfinement, with real mass flows connecting these dualities to the symmetric-tensor models of an earlier work.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the known dualities used to deconfine the tensors remain valid once they are coupled to an extra gauge node and to linear monopole superpotentials; if that coupling breaks them, the derived confining descriptions would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The confining classification for $SU(N)$ with two antisymmetric tensors and $n_f+n_a=4$ is complete: the previously unproved cases $n_f=0,1,2$ follow from the known $n_f=3,4$ cases by a uniform deconfinement chain.
  • Every proof yields an exact identity for the squashed three-sphere partition function, for example Eqs. (2.10), (2.65), (2.83) and (3.3), so each duality can be checked numerically term by term.
  • Real mass flows that turn off the linear monopole superpotential reproduce the symmetric-tensor confining dualities of the earlier analysis, including superpotential terms that had only been dynamically generated there; in the $SU(2n)$ case all expected terms are recovered.
  • The symmetric-tensor dualities are unitary after flipping a set of operators: no chiral-ring operator in the dual Wess-Zumino models hits the unitarity bound.
  • The same duplication formula can be applied to other circle-reduced four-dimensional confining dualities, generating new three-dimensional confining theories with monopole superpotentials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The uniform derivation suggests that the whole three-dimensional confining landscape for rank-two tensors may be generated from the two classical four-dimensional s-confining dualities by deconfinement plus circle reduction; if so, a complete classification would not require new sporadic input.
  • The duplication formula acts as a dictionary between antisymmetric-tensor and symmetric-tensor dualities; one could invert it and search systematically for missing families by looking for four-dimensional parents with enough fundamentals, rather than by direct moduli-space inspection.
  • Because the same pipeline uses duplication formulas for hyperbolic Gamma functions, the analogous construction with Jacobi theta functions should produce two-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=(0,2)$ confining dualities with symmetric tensors, giving a concrete test in one lower dimension.
  • The unified formula covering both parities of $N$ after duplication hints that symmetric-tensor confining dualities are parity-uniform even when their four-dimensional parents are not; checking whether the full superpotential is also parity-uniform would sharpen the duality map.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the infrared dynamics of 3d N=2 SU(N) gauge theories with rank-two tensor matter. In Section 2 the authors use the tensor deconfinement technique to propose derivations of the confining dualities for SU(N) with two antisymmetric tensors and n_f+n_a=4 for n_f<3, reducing each case to the n_f=4 confining duality reviewed in Appendix A. In Section 3 they study SU(N) theories with a symmetric tensor, in some cases together with a conjugate antisymmetric tensor, and linear monopole superpotentials; these dualities are first motivated by applying the duplication formula to four-dimensional s-confining dualities reduced on a circle, and then supported by deconfining the tensors and sequentially confining the resulting gauge nodes. The paper also provides matching of squashed three-sphere partition functions for each duality.

Significance. If the results hold, Section 2 would complete the tensor-deconfinement proof of the n_f+n_a=4 family of confining dualities for two antisymmetric tensors, and Section 3 would provide non-trivial confining dualities with symmetric tensors and linear monopole superpotentials, including flows to previously claimed models of [19]. The explicit nature of the derivations and the written-out partition-function identities are strengths, as is the systematic separation of even and odd rank. However, the central claim for one of the main symmetric-tensor families is explicitly left incomplete, and the Section 2 results rely on an unpublished, partly self-cited input; these issues are load-bearing for the paper's main conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.2, after Eq. (3.33)] The paper explicitly states that the symmetry-allowed term Ψ_2^2 Ψ_1 Ψ_6^{(m)} Ψ_6^{(2n-m)} is not obtained from tensor deconfinement, nor in [19], and that its existence and stability require further investigation. This is a load-bearing gap: the claimed confining duality for SU(2n+1) with S, \tilde A, \tilde Q_S and 3 \tilde Q rests on the WZ superpotential (3.33) being the exact IR description. If that term is generated, the superpotential is incomplete and the chiral ring may differ. The squashed-sphere identity (3.22) cannot resolve this because the partition function is insensitive to exact superpotential terms. The authors should either derive the missing term, prove it is absent, or explicitly restate the Section 3.2 claim as conditional.
  2. [2.1-2.6 and Appendix A] Every derivation in Section 2 reduces the theory to the SU(M) two-antisymmetric-four-fundamental confining duality of [19], which is reviewed in Appendix A but not re-derived. Since [19] is an unpublished preprint (arXiv:2405.11972) by two of the same authors, the results of Section 2 inherit any unverified assumption in that input. The authors should state the status of [19] or provide an independent derivation of the n_f=4 confining duality; otherwise the Section 2 claims are conditional on that black box.
  3. [2.4 and 2.6] The deconfinement steps in Eqs. (2.58) and (2.94) use USp(2n-2) gauge groups with linear monopole superpotentials and additional charged fields V_i, U_i, citing the effective duality of [24]. The validity of these deconfinement dualities when coupled to the central SU gauge node and to the added superpotential terms is not demonstrated beyond the partition-function check. Because these inputs are used to derive the final WZ superpotentials, a concrete check of the chiral-ring matching for the deconfined quiver would strengthen the derivation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [2.3 and 2.6] There are incorrect figure cross-references: in Section 2.3 the text after Eq. (2.50) refers to "the third quiver in Figure 4," which belongs to Section 2.4, not to Figure 3; in Section 2.6 the text after Eq. (2.105) refers to "the third quiver in Figure 5," which should be Figure 6.
  2. [3.2 and Conclusions] Several typos should be corrected: "fo [10]" should be "for [10]", "the first relation hods" should be "the first relation holds", "has has" should be "has", "In principe" should be "In principle", and "He have focused" should be "We have focused".
  3. [2.3, Eq. (2.46)] In Eq. (2.46), the index "N-j-2" uses an undefined N; based on the surrounding text it should be "n-j-2".
  4. [3.1 and 3.2] The partition-function notation in Eqs. (3.3), (3.22), and related identities uses multiple semicolon-separated arguments without defining the ordering or the meaning of the "−" entries; a brief explanation of the notation would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the new dualities are derived from independent known dualities and exact identities; the admitted missing term in Sec. 3.2 is a completeness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. In Section 2, each nf<3 confining duality for SU(N) with two antisymmetric tensors is obtained by deconfining the tensors, dualizing the SU gauge node via the external duality of [32], then confining the USp nodes and invoking the nf=4 confinement duality of Appendix A (from [25], proved in [19]). The nf=4 result is a genuine different case with four fundamentals, not the target nf<3 claim, so reducing to it is a valid proof strategy rather than a self-definitional reduction. No parameters are fitted and no partition-function identity is assumed equal to the target identity. In Section 3, the symmetric-tensor dualities are first conjectured by applying the duplication formula to 4d s-confining dualities of [2] reduced to S^1 via [24], and then independently reconstructed by tensor deconfinement using the SO and USp dualities of [12], [24], and [16]. The self-citations [19] and [16] are load-bearing but independent: [19] proves a different nf=4 confinement and [16] is an exact identity for USp adjoint SQCD obtained elsewhere; neither assumes the present paper's target dualities. The paper explicitly flags one symmetry-allowed term in Sec. 3.2, Ψ_2^2 Ψ_1 Ψ_6^(m) Ψ_6^(2n-m), that is not obtained from tensor deconfinement, but this is an admitted incompleteness in the derivation of the WZ superpotential, not a circularity: the missing term is not used as an input to derive itself. The localization identity (3.22) is also not relied on to prove the missing superpotential term. Therefore the central claims are not forced by definition or by a self-citation chain, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a chain of known dualities and the standard localization and duality dictionary. No new entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted to data; the only hand-chosen values are the frozen mass parameters in Sec. 3 used to apply the duplication formula. The main risk is the reliance on self-cited results, particularly [16] and [19].

free parameters (1)
  • Frozen fundamental mass parameters (3.1) and (3.21) = mu2 = omega1/2 + tauS/2, mu3 = omega2/2 + tauS/2, mu4 = tauS/2
    Hand-chosen specialization of the 4d/3d reduction to enable the duplication formula; all symmetric-tensor identities in Sec. 3 depend on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The cited 3d N=2 dualities used in the deconfinement steps are valid (Aharony duality for symplectic SQCD, Nii's SU(N) duality, the SO(N) and USp confining dualities of [12], [16], [24]).
    These dualities are used as black boxes to deconfine, dualize, and confine the auxiliary gauge nodes; the paper does not prove them.
  • domain assumption The 4d s-confining dualities of Csaki-Schmaltz-Skiba [1,2] and their S1 reduction with KK monopole superpotentials [24] are valid.
    Appendix B reviews these and Sec. 3 starts from them before applying the duplication formula.
  • domain assumption The confining duality for SU(M) with two antisymmetric tensors and four fundamentals from [25] and [19] is valid.
    All Section 2 proofs reduce to this duality (Appendix A); it is reviewed but not re-derived.
  • domain assumption A matching of the squashed 3-sphere partition function (with the given symmetries and deformations) is sufficient evidence to propose an IR duality.
    The symmetric-tensor claims are first read off from hyperbolic Gamma function identities before being checked by deconfinement.
  • standard math Hyperbolic Gamma function inversion and duplication formulas are valid.
    Used extensively, e.g., Eqs. (2.15) and (3.2).
  • domain assumption The linear monopole superpotential Y_bare_SU(N-2) enforces the balancing condition (3.4) and gives the stated constraint on the global symmetries.
    Stated in Sec. 3.1 after Eq. (3.5); the check is not shown in detail.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rank-two tensors and deconfinement in 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ $SU(N)$ gauge theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/APY24MRQ

@misc{pith2026250421654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rank-two tensors and deconfinement in 3d $\mathcalN=2$ $SU(N)$ gauge theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/APY24MRQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21654}
}
abstract

In this paper we study the IR dynamics of $SU(N)$ gauge theories with four supercharges in 3d in presence of symmetric or antisymmetric tensor. Using the tensor deconfinement technique we provide some proofs of results previously claimed in the literature about confining dualities for $SU(N)$ with two antisymmetric tensors. Furthermore we study 3d confining dualities with symmetric tensors and linear monopole superpotentials. These confining dualities have been obtained by applying the duplication formula for the hyperbolic Gamma functions on effective dualities on $\mathbb{R}^{1,2} \times S^1$ with $SU(N)$ gauge groups and antisymmetric tensors. We conclude the analysis providing an alternative derivation, again using the tensor deconfinement technique.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Six Easy Pieces: interplays among dualities in 4d, 3d and 2d

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Baryon-deformed SU(N) gauge theory with an antisymmetric tensor is shown to flow to a free magnetic phase, and its reductions yield new 3d SU/SO and 2d SU/USp dualities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Amariti and F

    A. Amariti and F. Mantegazza, Confinement for 3d N = 2SU (N) with a Symmetric tensor, 2405.11972

    arXiv

  2. [16]

    Amariti and S

    A. Amariti and S. Rota, 3d N=2 SO/USp adjoint SQCD: s-confinement and exact identities, Nucl. Phys. B 987 (2023) 116068 [ 2202.06885]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [24]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Razamat, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, 3d dualities from 4d dualities , JHEP 07 (2013) 149 [ 1305.3924]

    arXiv 2013

  4. [1]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, A Systematic approach to confinement in N=1 supersymmetric gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 799 [ hep-th/9610139]

    arXiv 1997

  5. [2]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Confinement in N=1 SUSY gauge theories and model building tools, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7840 [ hep-th/9612207]

    arXiv 1997

  6. [3]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg and M. J. Strassler, Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 67 [hep-th/9703110]

    arXiv 1997

  7. [4]

    de Boer, K

    J. de Boer, K. Hori and Y. Oz, Dynamics of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 163 [ hep-th/9703100]

    arXiv 1997

  8. [5]

    Intriligator and N

    K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories , JHEP 07 (2013) 079 [ 1305.1633]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 46 references
  1. [6]

    Berkooz, The Dual of supersymmetric SU(2k) with an antisymmetric tensor and composite dualities, Nucl

    M. Berkooz, The Dual of supersymmetric SU(2k) with an antisymmetric tensor and composite dualities, Nucl. Phys. B 452 (1995) 513 [ hep-th/9505067]

    1995 arXiv

  2. [7]

    M. A. Luty, M. Schmaltz and J. Terning, A Sequence of duals for Sp(2N) supersymmetric gauge theories with adjoint matter , Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 7815 [hep-th/9603034]

    1996 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Pouliot, Duality in SUSY SU(N) with an antisymmetric tensor , Phys

    P. Pouliot, Duality in SUSY SU(N) with an antisymmetric tensor , Phys. Lett. B 367 (1996) 151 [ hep-th/9510148]. – 53 –

    1996 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Pasquetti and M

    S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, From 3d dualities to 2d free field correlators and back , JHEP 11 (2019) 081 [ 1903.10817]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Benvenuti, I

    S. Benvenuti, I. Garozzo and G. Lo Monaco, Monopoles and dualities in 3dN = 2 quivers, JHEP 10 (2021) 191 [ 2012.08556]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [11]

    I. G. Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, M. Lotito and A. K. Sorout, DeconfiningN = 2 SCFTs or the art of brane bending , JHEP 03 (2022) 140 [ 2111.08022]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Benvenuti and G

    S. Benvenuti and G. Lo Monaco, A toolkit for ortho-symplectic dualities , JHEP 09 (2023) 002 [ 2112.12154]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [13]

    L. E. Bottini, C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, Dualities from dualities: the sequential deconfinement technique, JHEP 05 (2022) 069 [ 2201.11090]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Bajeot and S

    S. Bajeot and S. Benvenuti, Sequential deconfinement and self-dualities in 4dN = 1 gauge theories, JHEP 10 (2022) 007 [ 2206.11364]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Bajeot and S

    S. Bajeot and S. Benvenuti, 4dN = 1 dualities from 5d dualities , JHEP 08 (2024) 197 [2212.11217]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Amariti, F

    A. Amariti, F. Mantegazza and D. Morgante, Sporadic dualities from tensor deconfinement, JHEP 05 (2024) 188 [ 2307.14146]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Amariti and F

    A. Amariti and F. Mantegazza, A new 4d N = 1 duality from the superconformal index, JHEP 06 (2024) 206 [ 2402.00609]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Benvenuti, R

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi, Deconfinements, Kutasov-Schwimmer dualities and Dp[SU (N)] theories, 2407.11134

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Hwang and S

    C. Hwang and S. Kim, S-confinement of 3d Argyres-Douglas theories and the Seiberg-like duality with an adjoint matter , 2407.11129

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Seiberg, Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories , Nucl

    N. Seiberg, Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 129 [ hep-th/9411149]

    1995 arXiv

  16. [23]

    K. A. Intriligator and P. Pouliot, Exact superpotentials, quantum vacua and duality in supersymmetric SP(N(c)) gauge theories , Phys. Lett. B 353 (1995) 471 [hep-th/9505006]

    1995 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Nii, On s-confinement in 3d N = 2 gauge theories with anti-symmetric tensors , 1906.03908

    K. Nii, On s-confinement in 3d N = 2 gauge theories with anti-symmetric tensors , 1906.03908. – 54 –

    1906 arXiv

  18. [26]

    N. Hama, K. Hosomichi and S. Lee, SUSY Gauge Theories on Squashed Three-Spheres , JHEP 05 (2011) 014 [ 1102.4716]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Romelsberger, Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl

    C. Romelsberger, Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 747 (2006) 329 [ hep-th/0510060]

    2006 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kinney, J

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju, An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 275 (2007) 209 [ hep-th/0510251]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Benini, S

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and S. Pasquetti, SUSY monopole potentials in 2+1 dimensions, JHEP 08 (2017) 086 [ 1703.08460]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Martone, Y. Shirman, P. Tanedo and J. Terning, Dynamics of 3D SUSY Gauge Theories with Antisymmetric Matter , JHEP 08 (2014) 141 [ 1406.6684]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Amariti, C

    A. Amariti, C. Cs´ aki, M. Martone and N. R.-L. Lorier, From 4D to 3D chiral theories: Dressing the monopoles, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 105027 [ 1506.01017]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nii, Duality and Confinement in 3d N = 2 ”chiral”SU (N) gauge theories, Nucl

    K. Nii, Duality and Confinement in 3d N = 2 ”chiral”SU (N) gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 939 (2019) 507 [ 1809.10757]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Willett and I

    B. Willett and I. Yaakov, N = 2 dualities and Z-extremization in three dimensions , JHEP 10 (2020) 136 [ 1104.0487]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Closset and S. Cremonesi, Comments on 3d Seiberg-like dualities , JHEP 10 (2011) 075 [ 1108.5373]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Aharony and I

    O. Aharony and I. Shamir, On O(Nc)d = 3 N = 2 supersymmetric QCD Theories , JHEP 12 (2011) 043 [ 1109.5081]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Amariti and L

    A. Amariti and L. Cassia, USp(2Nc) SQCD3 with antisymmetric: dualities and symmetry enhancements, JHEP 02 (2019) 013 [ 1809.03796]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Benvenuti, A tale of exceptional 3d dualities, JHEP 03 (2019) 125 [ 1809.03925]

    S. Benvenuti, A tale of exceptional 3d dualities, JHEP 03 (2019) 125 [ 1809.03925]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Jiang, S

    J. Jiang, S. Nawata and J. Zheng, 2d dualities from 4d , 2407.17350

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Amariti, P

    A. Amariti, P. Glorioso, F. Mantegazza, D. Morgante and A. Zanetti, Dualities from dualities in 2d N = (0, 2), 2410.12453

  32. [40]

    Amariti, P

    A. Amariti, P. Glorioso, C. Mascherpa and A. Zanetti, On the zoology of 2d N = (0, 2) dualities gauge theories with antisymmetric matter , 2504.16544

  33. [41]

    Sacchi, New 2dN = (0, 2) dualities from four dimensions , JHEP 12 (2020) 009 [2004.13672]

    M. Sacchi, New 2dN = (0, 2) dualities from four dimensions , JHEP 12 (2020) 009 [2004.13672]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and N. M. Paquette, Dual boundary conditions in 3d SCFT’s , JHEP 05 (2018) 060 [ 1712.07654]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Okazaki and D

    T. Okazaki and D. J. Smith, Boundary confining dualities and Askey-Wilson type q-beta integrals, JHEP 08 (2023) 048 [ 2305.00247]. – 55 –

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. S. Razamat and B. Willett, On the reduction of 4d N = 1 theories on S2, JHEP 11 (2015) 163 [ 1506.08795]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    V. P. Spiridonov and G. S. Vartanov, Elliptic Hypergeometry of Supersymmetric Dualities, Commun. Math. Phys. 304 (2011) 797 [ 0910.5944]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bajeot and S

    S. Bajeot and S. Benvenuti, S-confinements from deconfinements, JHEP 11 (2022) 071 [2201.11049]. – 56 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.